Proposed Ordinance Would Give Cops an Invitation to All the Cool Parties

Suppose you are  a police officer responding
to complaints about a noisy party, and you suspect some of the
guests are younger than 21. In addition to asking the host to turn
down the music when he answers the door, you’d like to come in and
make sure that no minors are drinking. But the host won’t let you
in, and you don’t have a warrant. Ordinarily, that would be the end
of the matter. An
ordinance
under consideration in Montville, New Jersey, would
offer you a third option: Walk in and search the place anyway, as
long as you think you have probable cause to believe teenagers are
drinking inside.

Not surprisingly, the proposal has provoked considerable
controversy, to the point that neither the mayor, the police chief,
nor members of the Montville Township Committee, the community’s
governing body,
would talk
to a local reporter about it. Presumably supporters
of the ordinance are relying on the “exigent circumstances”
exception to the usual Fourth Amendment requirement of a warrant to
search someone’s home without consent. According to a gloss by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, “exigent circumstances are
present when a reasonable person [would] believe that entry…was
necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other
persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of the
suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating
legitimate law enforcement efforts.”

If Bud Light disappearing down the gullet of an 18-year-old
counts as “destruction of relevant evidence,” Montville’s town
fathers may be on to something. Otherwise, it seems like a stretch.
And depending on how the average Montville cop interprets probable
cause in this context, the new rule may in practice be an
invitation to every party attended by teenagers (or
20-year-olds).

It’s encouraging that the local CBS station apparently was
unable to find anyone willing to speak on the record in favor of
warrantless home searches to catch adolescent imbibers. “That’s
more of a parent responsibility rather than a police
responsibility,” one parent said. A token teenager added, “It’s not
really their business to be going into people’s houses. If you want
to do that, you need to get a warrant.” For now, at least.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1r7oXYF
via IFTTT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.