“If Russia wants to get involved with Syria, that’s really up to them,” President Donald Trump said yesterday, adding that he wishes “them all a lot of luck.”
But the Kurds are “no angels,” Trump insisted, and he could understand why Turkey might want their territory. “What does that have to do with the United States of America if they’re fighting over Syria’s land?” Trump asked.
The president doesn’t seem to understand that he’s not being criticized simply for getting the U.S. out of Syria. Getting out is right, but Trump did so in a such a way that left northern Syrians—America’s allies in fighting ISIS—especially vulnerable, made it more likely that ISIS militants would escape, and left the U.S. to bomb its own military facilities for lack of time to properly clear out the ammunition and equipment there.
Trump wants people to believe his actions stem from principled opposition to endless war, that they’re part of a grander plan to reduce the U.S. presence in Syria the Middle East. But no matter how many times Trump says it, his administration’s actions say otherwise.
For one thing, plenty of U.S. troops are staying put in parts of Syria that Turkey doesn’t want to invade. Meanwhile, just last week the administration announced that thousands more U.S. troops are being sent to Saudi Arabia. And since Trump took office, “the U.S. military presence in the Middle East has not changed much at all,” reports Foreign Affairs.
Trump’s rhetoric about ending forever wars and minding our own damn business is mighty refreshing, but rhetoric is all it is—empty rhetoric.
Trump seems to have thought it would be easy to convince Turkey not to invade in the first place. In an astonishing letter that the White House has confirmed is real, Trump starts out by telling Turkish President Erdogan: “Let’s work out a good deal!” The letter concludes:
History will look upon you favorably if you get this done the right and humane way. It will look upon you forever as the devil if good things don’t happen. Don’t be a tough guy. Don’t be a fool! I will call you later.
Erdogan reportedly threw Trump’s letter in the trash.
This is insane. pic.twitter.com/ERHXoQGqUS
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) October 16, 2019
Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo are now in Turkey trying to force a resolution. “We need them to stand down, we need a cease-fire, at which point we can begin to put this all back together again,” Pompeo said on Fox Business yesterday.
It might be too late for that.
“The Trump administration is correct to limit our commitment in eastern Syria, but it is very clumsy in managing the policy and the rollout,” former U.S. ambassador to Syria Robert S. Ford told The New York Times. “At this late stage, it is not clear what the administration can hope to salvage.”
— CSPAN (@cspan) October 16, 2019
Yesterday’s House hearing on Section 230 and social-media moderation was, predictably, another clown show:
Dr. Farid claiming that content moderation only started recently. WHAT?!? How is this guy testifying before Congress when he's wholly ignorant of content moderation's history.
— Mike Masnick (@mmasnick) October 16, 2019
Amazing to watch a conservative member of Congress grill Google about too much content moderation right after Dr. Farid accused these companies of not having any motivation to moderate content. #Section230
— Patrick Hedger (@PatHedger18) October 16, 2019
— Robert Winterton (@RobPWJ) October 16, 2019
There have been some calls—from both sides of the aisle—for a Big Government to mandate or dictate free speech or ensure fairness online. These proposals are not consistent with the #FirstAmendment. pic.twitter.com/wNVnf2DJ87
— CathyMcMorrisRodgers (@cathymcmorris) October 16, 2019
"If it's illegal in real life, it should be illegal online."
Newsflash: IT ???????? IS ????????
— Taxpayers Protection Alliance (@Protectaxpayers) October 16, 2019
Summary of today's #Section230 hearing: bring together a few experts on how 230 and content moderation works, mixed with a few people who haven't the foggiest clue beyond "obviously it can be fixed" and pepper them with misleading questions prepared by anti-internet lobbyists.
— Mike Masnick (@mmasnick) October 16, 2019
For more on what Section 230 is and what’s at stake, watch this recent Reason TV video:
The U.K. is ditching plans to require porn sites to age-verify all customers.
It's almost as if this invasive idea has been untenable and unrealistic from the start. ???? https://t.co/1GZC25HS6S
— Rach ???? (@Adjective_Girl) October 16, 2019
- Rep. Elijah Cummings (D–Md.) has died.
- Over 170 people are scheduled to testify at a hearing today on a District of Columbia bill to decriminalize prostitution. (I’ll be there—check out @enbrown on Twitter for live updates.)
- Prisoners are suing to end solitary confinement in North Carolina.
- Julian Castro: “I also want people to think—the folks this week that saw those images of ISIS prisoners running free—to think about how absurd it is that this president is caging kids on the border and effectively letting ISIS prisoners run free.”
from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2MlX2Fq