Cascend: “This Is The Most Important Chart Of The 2020 Election”
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/23/2020 – 17:00
By Eric Ross, Chief Investment Strategist at Cascend.com
This is the most important chart of the 2020 election:
- Trump starts with a less-stable base
- But 216 of 535 Electoral College votes are too close to call
- Let that sink in: 40% of Electoral College votes appear too close to conclusively call as of today
- Even if we assume that states with only a 2% or greater spread are set, 66 Electoral College votes are up-for-grabs
- 2% spread is well within margins of error – it’s really a toss-up
- Sentiment analysis suggests Biden may squeak by
- But swing states are really toss-ups and targeted action can drastically change this race
This is the same data, but as the complete form which suits data scientists and investors best: our Electoral College daily probability heat map
- It is a very clear way to see the daily changes in election probabilities, particularly how major events change the probability landscape and which states cause the changes
- Each of the columns is a day (ending October 18th)
- Each row is a state, with the height of the state’s row/cells determined by the relative number of electoral votes (i.e. California’s row height is much higher than Maine)
- This gives an easy visual reading for Electoral College voting likelihood
- Blue for Biden, Red for Trump
- The color intensity is based on the win/lose spread – white is “undecided” (exactly 50/50)
- You can easily see how events in the 2020 election impact daily voter sentiment for the two candidates
- Data is based on our consumer sentiment technology
An increasing number of states are now swing states (and will decide this election)
- Florida (2.9% to Trump)
- Pennsylvania (+1.8% to Trump)
- Georgia (+0.4% to Trump)
But…
- Arizona (+0.2% to Biden)
- North Carolina (+0.1 to Biden)
- Michigan (+1.4% to Biden)
- New Hampshire (+1.6% to Biden)
- Minnesota (2.0% to Biden)
- South Carolina (2.2% to Biden)
- Nevada (2.4% to Biden)
- Maine (2.6% to Biden)
- Wisconsin (2.7% to Biden)
….it’s really a complete toss-up
Florida is trending toward Trump
Pennsylvania is trending toward Trump
Biden has a small advantage in Arizona
Georgia
Michigan
Minnesota
New Hampshire
North Carolina
Wisconsin
There is clearly an issue with the efficacy of traditional polling for U.S. Presidential elections
- The majority of polls in 2016 widely favored Hillary Clinton to win by a significant margin
- Virtually every poll also failed to predict Brexit and the UK general election
- One issue is that traditional polls generally capture “positive” support, whereas much of these elections have been driven by negative sentiment
- There were clearly many voters who were not polled, and may not be discussing their preferences openly
- We see 2020 as similar (in polling efficacy)
- Virtually every major poll out there suggests Biden is far ahead and a landslide is likely: Does our heat map or analysis above suggest a landslide win to you?
Our methodology is very different from a traditional pollster:
- We utilize our proprietary consumer demand sentiment technology to elucidate trends in specific interests, much as we would measure brand activity
- In 2016 our models suggested an 80% chance that Donald Trump would win the general election versus Hillary Clinton
- Our models currently predict a much tighter race than in 2020
- However, the spreads are tighter in key states and public opinion is far more volatile in 2020 than in 2016
via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2TkLqFn Tyler Durden