Month: August 2026

Learned Hand’s Reflections On His Professors

In 1958, the great Judge Learned Hand ended a series of lectures at Harvard Law School by reflecting on his professors when he was a law student there in the 1890s. It remains my favorite passage about law professors, and a vision for us in the profession to aspire to meet. Judge Hand wrote:

More years ago than I like now to remember I sat in this building and listened to — yes, more than that, was dissected by — men all but one of whom are now dead. What I got from them was not alone the Rule in Shelley’s case, or what was one’s duty to an invited person — as we then called him — or what law determined whether a contract has been made, or how inadequate was the common law of partnership before the advent of Cory on Accounts, or in what jurisdictions a corporation is “present.” True, I did get those so far as I was able to absorb them, but I got much more. I carried away the impress of a band of devoted scholars; patient, considerate, courteous and kindly, whom nothing could daunt and nothing could bribe. The memory of those men has been with me ever since. Again and again they have helped me when the labor seemed heavy, the task seemed trivial, and the confusion seemed indecipherable. From them I learned that it is as craftsmen that we get our satisfactions and our pay. In the universe of truth they lived by the sword; they asked no quarter of absolutes and they gave none. Go ye and do likewise.

So, so good.

My understanding is that Learned Hand had taken classes from a bunch of professors who are still well known names in the law: Christopher Columbus Langdell, James Barr Ames, John Chipman Gray, James Bradley Thayer, and Samuel Williston among them.  His former professor who was still alive at the time of Hand’s lecture was Williston, who died in 1963 at the age of 101.  Judge Hand himself passed in 1961, at the age of 89.

The post Learned Hand's Reflections On His Professors appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/Wb1ZYyo
via IFTTT

Trump Wants the FCC To Punish His Enemies

On this special edition of The Reason Roundtable, Senior Editor Robby Soave is joined by Associate Editor Liz Wolfe, reporter Reem Ibrahim, and Senior Producer Zach Weissmueller to discuss President Donald Trump’s latest threat to use the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) against Meet the Press host Kristen Welker. They debate Trump’s willingness to use government power against speech he dislikes, whether the FCC has become obsolete in the age of digital media, and what the president’s attacks on the press say about the Republican Party’s commitment to free speech.

The panel also discusses Trump’s escalating war with Iran, Meta’s $17 billion settlement over alleged harms to children and whether parents or the government should be responsible for limiting kids’ social media use, and the deportation of Milo Yiannopoulos amid his feud with Laura Loomer.

 

0:00—Trump wants the FCC to punish Welker

13:58—U.S. and Iran trade strikes in the Strait of Hormuz

23:56—Meta settles lawsuit for $17 billion

45:15—Yiannopoulos gets deported

52:08—Weekly cultural recommendations

 

Upcoming Reason Events

The Reason Roundtable’s 10th Anniversary—Live in NYC! October 7

 

Mentioned in the podcast:

“Trump Declared NBC’s Kristen Welker Will Be ‘Reported To the FCC For Rebuke or Punishment’,” by Liz Wolfe

“A Liberal Think Tank and an Air Force Major Are Trump’s Latest Targets for Speech Policing,” by Joe Lancaster

“What Craigslist and Backpage Can Tell Us About the Meta Settlement,” by Elizabeth Nolan Brown

“Haidt’s Moment,” by Liz Wolfe

“9/11 Turbocharged America’s Worst Foreign Policy Impulses—but Didn’t Change Its Direction,” by Emma Ashford

“Milo Yiannopoulos Wanted Millions Deported. He Didn’t Mean Himself,” by Billy Binion

The post Trump Wants the FCC To Punish His Enemies appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/kMoGJfp
via IFTTT

Strictly Ballroom: Justice Kavanaugh Defeats Chief Justice Roberts

I often write that my favorite writings by Chief Justice Roberts are when he’s in dissent. These are the rare instances when I think he actually believes what he is writing. But the opposite seems true in National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States. The Court, by a 5-4 vote, stayed the injunction, thus allowing construction of the East Wing ballroom/military complex. The majority opinion was per curiam, though as I’ll explain below, it is almost certainly a Kavanaugh production. Chief Justice Roberts was in dissent, joined by the Court’s three liberals. Based on my quick search, this lineup appeared only one other time in NIH v. APHA.

At this point, John Roberts is utterly unrecognizable. This was the person that George W. Bush nominated to the Supreme Court because of his robust understanding of presidential power in the national security context, yet Roberts dismissed the government’s national security concerns in a perfunctory footnote. This was the same justice who bitterly dissented in Massachusetts v. EPA, finding that the broad theory of standing would inject the judiciary into political disputes, but Roberts allowed a person walking past the White House to halt the construction of a military facility. This was a Justice who upheld the arrest of a D.C. tween who ate a single french fry on the metro, but extolled a D.C. busybody who walked past the metro as “deeply committed” to preserving the nation’s capital.

This sentence from Justice Kavanaugh’s opinion is the sort of thing that Chief Justice Roberts would mutter in his sleep:

Meanwhile, on the other side of the ledger and against these harms, the only harm the Trust claims is the offense one of its members will suffer from having to view a structure of the “scale,” “height,” and “massing” the government intends. Id., at 75a. These harms and equities are not nearly in equipoise.

At this point, the Chief Justice is a shadow of his former self. This was a case where Roberts determined that Trump should not win, so he did not win. In the end, all the Chief could do is wax about Winston Churchill in his dissent. Well, I have a far more appropriate quotation for the Chief’s tenure: “Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”

I would hope to see many more Roberts dissents next term. As I wrote, “Friends don’t let friends be the chief justice’s fifth vote.” Find a way to get to five without the Chief.

If Chief Justice Roberts is the loser here, then Justice Kavanaugh is the winner. I am fairly confident that Justice Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion. He has become the Court’s stickler for standing. I think he also wrote the jurisdictional analysis in Trump v. California.

And as I predicted, the Court rejected the D.C. Circuit’s “aesthetic” injury precedents. Justice Kavanaugh leads off with the critical line:

This Court has not found standing in circumstances like these before. To the contrary, we have repeatedly held that mere offense, disagreement, or distaste does not qualify as a concrete and particularized injury under Article III.

Even if the D.C. Circuit found standing, the Supreme Court did not. I suspect that Justice Kavanaugh labored under the D.C. Circuit’s terrible standing decisions for about two decades. He has now scaled them back. I hope the D.C. Circuit takes this ruling to heart, and realizes that offended observers do not state an Article III injury. Indeed, this ruling should spill over to the Establishment Clause context, as well as Havens Realty standing. People who object to a Ten Commandments display have nothing more than “offense, disagreement, or distaste.”

More generally, there is something satisfying about this ruling in light of Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. Those opposing abortion were denied “aesthetic” injury standing to see babies born. It only follows that architecture wonks likewise lack “aesthetic” injury standing to see buildings. Whatever the rules are, they should be applied equally.

I consider Justice Barrett to be the leading proceduralist on the Court. Again, she found that no one had standing in Murthy, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, California v. Texas, and every other case Texas brought to the Court. Barrett clerked for Justice Scalia, so likely has thought about Lujan more than anyone else on the bench. If she thinks Justice Kavanaugh has the better reading of Lujan, then I’m with Barrett. This is the key sentence:

Proceeding to reject the plaintiffs’ claim to standing, Lujan stressed that a cognizable interest is a necessary component of standing but not a sufficient one: Article III “requires more than an injury to a cognizable interest.” 504 U. S., at 563 (internal quotation marks omitted).

At bottom, the D.C. Circuit extended Lujan in improper ways, and the Supreme Court has now yelled “stop it.”

The post Strictly Ballroom: Justice Kavanaugh Defeats Chief Justice Roberts appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/O6me4np
via IFTTT

Universities Could Lose Foreign-Student Certification Over Internship Rule Violations, Trump Admin Says

Universities Could Lose Foreign-Student Certification Over Internship Rule Violations, Trump Admin Says

Authored by Kimberly Hayek via The Epoch Times,

President Donald Trump’s administration has issued a memo to universities aimed at restricting certain internship work authorizations for international students. Officials cautioned that schools failing to comply could have their certification to enroll foreign students revoked.

A student walks toward Royce Hall on the campus of University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) on March 11, 2020. Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images

The memo, which is dated Aug. 24 and issued by the Student and Exchange Visitor Program under U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), said the agency “has observed a rise in Curricular Practical Training (CPT) authorizations that appear to violate regulatory requirements which permit CPT only where the training is an integral part of an established curriculum.”

“Failure to comply with SEVP regulations may result in an institution losing certification to enroll foreign students,” the memo said.

Some schools have already stopped processing applications. The University of California, Los Angeles ceased issuing certain CPT authorizations while it reviewed the guidance.

“UCLA has paused certain Curricular Practical Training authorizations while it reviews recent federal guidance and determines next steps,” a UCLA spokesperson said.

At the University of California, Berkeley, the international office described the Aug. 24 memo as “more narrow in focus, more direct, and includes content that is more restrictive in nature.”

An earlier memo had been issued in mid-August. Berkeley said it is unlikely to process certain work authorization applications “in the near future” and told international students to plan accordingly.

The university will keep handling “degree-requirement” CPT as usual and plans to resume “Doctoral Dissertation and Master’s Thesis Research CPT.”

University officials said they would consult legal experts to align processes with the new federal requirements.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), ICE’s parent agency, said the underlying regulations have not changed.

“However, schools and employers should consider themselves on notice: under President Trump, abuse of this generous system will no longer be tolerated.”

CPT allows eligible international students to participate in internships or training when the work forms an integral part of their academic curriculum. The memo stresses that the training must connect to an established academic program.

This step fits into an overarching set of changes for foreign students. In July, DHS completed a rule ending the long-standing “duration of status” policy. That system had permitted many F, J, and I visa holders to remain in the country without a fixed departure date.

The new rule, published in the Federal Register on July 17 and effective Sept. 15, limits most stays to four years unless students apply for extensions through the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Extensions will require screening, background checks, and fraud reviews. The grace period after the conclusion of studies is reduced from 60 days to 30 days.

“For nearly half a century, the outdated ‘duration of status’ system has compromised national security and created an environment ripe for immigration fraud,” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin said at the time.

“By implementing clear, finite limits on these visas, the United States is reclaiming its ability to properly screen, vet, and monitor individuals within our borders.”

The rule is being challenged in court by a coalition of unions and advocacy groups that say the new rule makes the United States less competitive as a destination for international talent.

Earlier this year, ICE published the findings of an investigation into Optional Practical Training, a separate post-graduation work program.

Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said investigators “have identified over 10,000 foreign students who claim to be working for highly suspect employers.”

Visits turned up empty buildings, locked doors, and addresses associated with hundreds of students who were not involved in the activity they claimed, he said. Officials also found “phantom employees” who never reported to the listed sites, as well as complex international financial transactions, according to Lyons.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/31/2026 – 19:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/c1lZETN Tyler Durden

Take-Two Tumbles Most In Months As BofA Calls Grand Theft Auto Reveal “Impressive, But Unlikely To Surprise”

Take-Two Tumbles Most In Months As BofA Calls Grand Theft Auto Reveal “Impressive, But Unlikely To Surprise”

Take-Two Interactive shares plunged the most in nearly seven months on Monday as investors weighed a series of “Grand Theft Auto VI” leaks in recent weeks ahead of the Nov. 19 release. 

The leaked clips reportedly expose plot details, character scenes, and gameplay mechanics, prompting Rockstar Games (a studio owned by TTWO) to call the leaks “gut-wrenching” and warn that some of the game’s surprises may have been spoiled. 

What X users are saying:

Omar Dessouky, an equity research analyst at Bank of America focused on gaming, digital advertising, and consumer internet companies, penned a note on Monday titled “GTA 6: Impressive Gameplay Reveal, but Unlikely to Surprise.” 

Dessouky pointed out that the trailer released by Take-Two Interactive last week reduced the risk of another launch delay by showing GTA VI is already playable. 

“Some details in the footage are consistent with access to a genuine playable build. Were a distributable copy to circulate, it could weigh on sales (particularly the PC version); at this stage, however, there is no clear evidence one exists,” the analyst said. 

Dessouky added that the footage delivered few surprises. Many of the mechanics had already been disclosed, while clips released by an anonymous account called CyberLeek stripped away some of the mystery ahead of the mid-November release. 

He forecasts that GTA VI will sell 45 million units during fiscal 2027, generate $3.44 billion in combined bookings with GTA Online, and deliver $898 million in incremental net income. Take-Two’s total bookings are forecasted to jump 36% to $9.16 billion. 

Dessouky maintained his Buy rating and $368 price target. The stock dropped 6.3% late in Monday’s cash session, marking its largest decline since Feb. 12, when it fell 6.6%. 

Gamers have waited 13 years for this point. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/31/2026 – 18:50

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Gn4pbl5 Tyler Durden

FDA Authorizes Generic Ivermectin Shot To Prevent Screwworm

FDA Authorizes Generic Ivermectin Shot To Prevent Screwworm

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

Federal regulators have authorized a generic ivermectin injection for the prevention of New World screwworm in cattle.

The Food and Drug Administration on Aug. 27 granted emergency use authorization for Bimectin, the injection, for use within 24 hours of birth.

The drug can also be used when castration is performed, or when a wound appears. It cannot be used in lactating dairy cows or in calves destined for veal.

Bimectin is a generic version of Ivomec, which the FDA authorized in February. The FDA previously approved Bimectin for treating and controlling parasites in cattle. The application for Bimectin came from Bimeda Animal Health, an Ireland-based company.

Based on available evidence, FDA officials concluded that the injection may prevent screwworm in cattle, and that the known and potential benefits outweigh known and potential risks. That information includes studies carried out in Brazil and Argentina in the 1990s, and a 2019 study conducted in Brazil, which found ivermectin injection prevented screwworm infestations in cattle, according to an FDA fact sheet.

“The animal safety profile for cattle, including male and female reproducing cattle, is well-characterized, and the information provided support that the food products obtained from the treated animals are safe for human consumption when used under the conditions described in the authorization,” the fact sheet stated.

“This authorization reflects the FDA’s commitment to expanding generic drug options against New World screwworm,” Timothy Schell, director of the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine, said in a statement. “By authorizing both generic and pioneer products, the Agency is ensuring producers aren’t dependent on a single manufacturer or product to protect their herds.”

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic medication widely used in animals. The drug is also available for humans, primarily to prevent worm infections.

Screwworm, a flesh-eating pest, entered the United States from Mexico earlier in 2026 for the first time in years.

The Trump administration has since approved or authorized more than a dozen drugs for screwworm prevention and/or treatment, including an ivermectin oral solution for horses, a medication for dogs and puppies, and a generic treatment for dogs, puppies, cats, and kittens.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, in its latest update, with data current through Aug. 25, said that there have been three screwworm cases in August, all in Texas. Two of the cases were among sheep, and one was in a goat.

There were 14 cases in July and 30 in June.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/31/2026 – 18:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/gtzE2cJ Tyler Durden

Learned Hand’s Reflections On His Professors

In 1958, the great Judge Learned Hand ended a series of lectures at Harvard Law School by reflecting on his professors when he was a law student there in the 1890s. It remains my favorite passage about law professors, and a vision for us in the profession to aspire to meet. Judge Hand wrote:

More years ago than I like now to remember I sat in this building and listened to — yes, more than that, was dissected by — men all but one of whom are now dead. What I got from them was not alone the Rule in Shelley’s case, or what was one’s duty to an invited person — as we then called him — or what law determined whether a contract has been made, or how inadequate was the common law of partnership before the advent of Cory on Accounts, or in what jurisdictions a corporation is “present.” True, I did get those so far as I was able to absorb them, but I got much more. I carried away the impress of a band of devoted scholars; patient, considerate, courteous and kindly, whom nothing could daunt and nothing could bribe. The memory of those men has been with me ever since. Again and again they have helped me when the labor seemed heavy, the task seemed trivial, and the confusion seemed indecipherable. From them I learned that it is as craftsmen that we get our satisfactions and our pay. In the universe of truth they lived by the sword; they asked no quarter of absolutes and they gave none. Go ye and do likewise.

So, so good.

My understanding is that Learned Hand had taken classes from a bunch of professors who are still well known names in the law: Christopher Columbus Langdell, James Barr Ames, John Chipman Gray, James Bradley Thayer, and Samuel Williston among them.  His former professor who was still alive at the time of Hand’s lecture was Williston, who died in 1963 at the age of 101.  Judge Hand himself passed in 1961, at the age of 89.

 

The post Learned Hand's Reflections On His Professors appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/Wb1ZYyo
via IFTTT

Trump Wants the FCC To Punish His Enemies

On this special edition of The Reason Roundtable, Senior Editor Robby Soave is joined by Associate Editor Liz Wolfe, reporter Reem Ibrahim, and Senior Producer Zach Weissmueller to discuss President Donald Trump’s latest threat to use the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) against Meet the Press host Kristen Welker. They debate Trump’s willingness to use government power against speech he dislikes, whether the FCC has become obsolete in the age of digital media, and what the president’s attacks on the press say about the Republican Party’s commitment to free speech.

The panel also discusses Trump’s escalating war with Iran, Meta’s $17 billion settlement over alleged harms to children and whether parents or the government should be responsible for limiting kids’ social media use, and the deportation of Milo Yiannopoulos amid his feud with Laura Loomer.

 

0:00—Trump wants the FCC to punish Welker

13:58—U.S. and Iran trade strikes in the Strait of Hormuz

23:56—Meta settles lawsuit for $17 billion

45:15—Yiannopoulos gets deported

52:08—Weekly cultural recommendations

 

Upcoming Reason Events

The Reason Roundtable’s 10th Anniversary—Live in NYC! October 7

 

Mentioned in the podcast:

“Trump Declared NBC’s Kristen Welker Will Be ‘Reported To the FCC For Rebuke or Punishment’,” by Liz Wolfe

“A Liberal Think Tank and an Air Force Major Are Trump’s Latest Targets for Speech Policing,” by Joe Lancaster

“What Craigslist and Backpage Can Tell Us About the Meta Settlement,” by Elizabeth Nolan Brown

“Haidt’s Moment,” by Liz Wolfe

“9/11 Turbocharged America’s Worst Foreign Policy Impulses—but Didn’t Change Its Direction,” by Emma Ashford

“Milo Yiannopoulos Wanted Millions Deported. He Didn’t Mean Himself,” by Billy Binion

The post Trump Wants the FCC To Punish His Enemies appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/kMoGJfp
via IFTTT

Strictly Ballroom: Justice Kavanaugh Defeats Chief Justice Roberts

I often write that my favorite writings by Chief Justice Roberts are when he’s in dissent. These are the rare instances when I think he actually believes what he is writing. But the opposite seems true in National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States. The Court, by a 5-4 vote, stayed the injunction, thus allowing construction of the East Wing ballroom/military complex. The majority opinion was per curiam, though as I’ll explain below, it is almost certainly a Kavanaugh production. Chief Justice Roberts was in dissent, joined by the Court’s three liberals. Based on my quick search, this lineup appeared only one other time in NIH v. APHA.

At this point, John Roberts is utterly unrecognizable. This was the person that George W. Bush nominated to the Supreme Court because of his robust understanding of presidential power in the national security context, yet Roberts dismissed the government’s national security concerns in a perfunctory footnote. This was the same justice who bitterly dissented in Massachusetts v. EPA, finding that the broad theory of standing would inject the judiciary into political disputes, but Roberts allowed a person walking past the White House to halt the construction of a military facility. This was a Justice who upheld the arrest of a D.C. tween who ate a single french fry on the metro, but extolled a D.C. busybody who walked past the metro as “deeply committed” to preserving the nation’s capital.

This sentence from Justice Kavanaugh’s opinion is the sort of thing that Chief Justice Roberts would mutter in his sleep:

Meanwhile, on the other side of the ledger and against these harms, the only harm the Trust claims is the offense one of its members will suffer from having to view a structure of the “scale,” “height,” and “massing” the government intends. Id., at 75a. These harms and equities are not nearly in equipoise.

At this point, the Chief Justice is a shadow of his former self. This was a case where Roberts determined that Trump should not win, so he did not win. In the end, all the Chief could do is wax about Winston Churchill in his dissent. Well, I have a far more appropriate quotation for the Chief’s tenure: “Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”

I would hope to see many more Roberts dissents next term. As I wrote, “Friends don’t let friends be the chief justice’s fifth vote.” Find a way to get to five without the Chief.

If Chief Justice Roberts is the loser here, then Justice Kavanaugh is the winner. I am fairly confident that Justice Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion. He has become the Court’s stickler for standing. I think he also wrote the jurisdictional analysis in Trump v. California.

And as I predicted, the Court rejected the D.C. Circuit’s “aesthetic” injury precedents. Justice Kavanaugh leads off with the critical line:

This Court has not found standing in circumstances like these before. To the contrary, we have repeatedly held that mere offense, disagreement, or distaste does not qualify as a concrete and particularized injury under Article III.

Even if the D.C. Circuit found standing, the Supreme Court did not. I suspect that Justice Kavanaugh labored under the D.C. Circuit’s terrible standing decisions for about two decades. He has now scaled them back. I hope the D.C. Circuit takes this ruling to heart, and realizes that offended observers do not state an Article III injury. Indeed, this ruling should spill over to the Establishment Clause context, as well as Havens Realty standing. People who object to a Ten Commandments display have nothing more than “offense, disagreement, or distaste.”

More generally, there is something satisfying about this ruling in light of Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. Those opposing abortion were denied “aesthetic” injury standing to see babies born. It only follows that architecture wonks likewise lack “aesthetic” injury standing to see buildings. Whatever the rules are, they should be applied equally.

I consider Justice Barrett to be the leading proceduralist on the Court. Again, she found that no one had standing in Murthy, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, California v. Texas, and every other case Texas brought to the Court. Barrett clerked for Justice Scalia, so likely has thought about Lujan more than anyone else on the bench. If she thinks Justice Kavanaugh has the better reading of Lujan, then I’m with Barrett. This is the key sentence:

Proceeding to reject the plaintiffs’ claim to standing, Lujan stressed that a cognizable interest is a necessary component of standing but not a sufficient one: Article III “requires more than an injury to a cognizable interest.” 504 U. S., at 563 (internal quotation marks omitted).

At bottom, the D.C. Circuit extended Lujan in improper ways, and the Supreme Court has now yelled “stop it.”

The post Strictly Ballroom: Justice Kavanaugh Defeats Chief Justice Roberts appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/O6me4np
via IFTTT

Fauci Told Aide To Delete Email About Risky Research

Fauci Told Aide To Delete Email About Risky Research

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

Dr. Anthony Fauci said an aide should delete an email about risky research his agency was funding, according to documents released on Aug. 29 by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

“Please delete this e-mail and then delete from the deleted file,” Fauci told Dr. Clifford Lane, a senior official at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), in a missive on March 4, 2012.

Fauci, NIAID’s director at the time, was commenting on an op-ed that criticized risky research that created a more transmissible H5N1 influenza virus. The research, led by European scientist Ron Fouchier, was funded by the NIAID.

The op-ed said the virus appeared to spread easily and would be lethal to humans if it escaped confinement or was stolen by terrorists. It highlighted the government’s funding of the research.

It also noted that the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity had recommended that papers prepared by researchers such as Fouchier omit key details that might help terrorists make their own versions of risky viruses.

Fauci told Lane that “people are getting to” Phil Boffey, the writer of the op-ed, “and he is swallowing it.” He said that the board’s decision was wrong. And he wrote that if the board maintained its stance, “the field of research on influenza transmissibility and host adaptability has a very serious problem.”

Fauci and Lane did not respond to requests for comment by publication time.

Boffey could not be reached.

Fouchier had told Science magazine that his team created “probably one of the most dangerous studies you can make.”

Several weeks later, Fauci coauthored an op-ed in the Washington Post that said work by Fouchier and another group funded by the NIAID involved careful work in isolated laboratories and advanced understanding of how mutations of H5N1, sometimes known as avian influenza, worked.

“This research has allowed identification of genetic pathways by which such a virus could better adapt to transmission among people,” the op-ed, titled A flu virus risk worth taking, stated.

Fauci’s agency later funded research in China that made a modified coronavirus more pathogenic than the original version, among other gain-of-function experiments.

Fauci’s directive to Lane was one of five times he told aides to delete emails, according to documents obtained and released by Paul. The other instances took place in 2009, 2011, and 2020. Fauci left the government in late 2022.

Paul said in a statement that the documents “show years of ‘delete this email’ orders.” He has referred Fauci to the Department of Justice for prosecution after Fauci, during an appearance before the Senate panel Paul chairs, declined to answer questions. Fauci has not been charged.

Prior to leaving office, President Joe Biden gave Fauci a preemptive pardon covering conduct from Jan. 1, 2014, to Jan. 19, 2025.

It is a federal crime to destroy or attempt to destroy federal records. Dr. David Morens, one of Fauci’s former aides, recently pleaded guilty to violating that law.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 08/31/2026 – 17:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/mtRJ6Cp Tyler Durden