Review: Saint Maud

Loder-stmaud

Maud is a young Welsh woman living joylessly in a dull resort town on the north coast of England. She works as a live-in nurse, tending the terminally afflicted and carrying on an endless interior conversation with God. Maud’s current employer, a once-famous dancer named Amanda Köhl, is dying of cancer. Amanda, an atheist, seems bitterly resigned to this, but Maud, a Catholic convert, believes that some part of the woman can still be saved, and that God has chosen her as His instrument in the matter. “It takes nothing special to mop up after the decrepit and the dying,” Maud says inside her head. “But to save a soul, that’s quite something.”

Saint Maud is a first feature by the young English writer-director Rose Glass, and it entirely resists classification. Although its dark, uneasy atmosphere and sometimes gruesome imagery lean in the direction of horror—Roman Polanski’s Repulsion is an obvious influence—it is not a full-on horror film itself (apart from one wild jolt toward the end). Nor are its religious issues just gothic window dressing—Glass, a onetime Catholic schoolgirl, has no interest in simply mocking them.

We know from the opening scene that something strange is going on with Maud (Welsh actor Morfydd Clark, of The Personal History of David Copperfield), and what it is soon becomes plain: Her personality is cratering as she is pulled deeper into an ecstatic religious obsession. The physical mortifications she inflicts upon herself—kneeling to pray on pebbly corn kernels, placing tacks inside her shoes and then squashing her feet down on them—are clearly tokens of something beyond spiritual devotion. And after arriving at Amanda’s house, she is further disturbed by her employer’s determination to maintain a connection to the libertine theatrical life she once led, which now includes a carnal relationship with a woman named Carol (Lily Frazer). “Am I indecent?” Amanda asks teasingly. “No,” says Maud. “You’re lost.”

Amanda pretends to share Maud’s commitment to God. “He’s everywhere,” Maud tells her. “He sees you. He won’t let you fall.” Amanda gazes at her with a small, cruel smirk that Maud doesn’t detect. “My little savior,” Amanda says.

The story takes a sudden turn when we see Maud out on the street one night, being hailed by an old friend (Lily Knight) who calls her by another name. Soon we learn that Maud once lived a very different life, and we watch as she falls back into it with a crash. Alcohol begins to flow, and there are anonymous handjobs in a pub and oblique mention of an unspecified trauma in Maud’s past. (“What happened before, it wasn’t your fault,” says a onetime friend.) The movie swells with a surge of bloody violence toward the end, before delivering a final passage of vivid, poetic force.

The movie is only 84 minutes long, which is just right. Apart from the electric performances of its two leads, director Glass has also drawn striking work from composer Adam Janota Bzowski, whose sparse score (woozy cellos, lowing male chorales) functions as a supporting character in the film, and from Ben Fordesman, whose chiaroscuro photography provides a perfect ground for the film’s burnished interiors and soft, milky skin tones. May all of these people work together again at some point soon.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3ov2vJK
via IFTTT

Review: Saint Maud

Loder-stmaud

Maud is a young Welsh woman living joylessly in a dull resort town on the north coast of England. She works as a live-in nurse, tending the terminally afflicted and carrying on an endless interior conversation with God. Maud’s current employer, a once-famous dancer named Amanda Köhl, is dying of cancer. Amanda, an atheist, seems bitterly resigned to this, but Maud, a Catholic convert, believes that some part of the woman can still be saved, and that God has chosen her as His instrument in the matter. “It takes nothing special to mop up after the decrepit and the dying,” Maud says inside her head. “But to save a soul, that’s quite something.”

Saint Maud is a first feature by the young English writer-director Rose Glass, and it entirely resists classification. Although its dark, uneasy atmosphere and sometimes gruesome imagery lean in the direction of horror—Roman Polanski’s Repulsion is an obvious influence—it is not a full-on horror film itself (apart from one wild jolt toward the end). Nor are its religious issues just gothic window dressing—Glass, a onetime Catholic schoolgirl, has no interest in simply mocking them.

We know from the opening scene that something strange is going on with Maud (Welsh actor Morfydd Clark, of The Personal History of David Copperfield), and what it is soon becomes plain: Her personality is cratering as she is pulled deeper into an ecstatic religious obsession. The physical mortifications she inflicts upon herself—kneeling to pray on pebbly corn kernels, placing tacks inside her shoes and then squashing her feet down on them—are clearly tokens of something beyond spiritual devotion. And after arriving at Amanda’s house, she is further disturbed by her employer’s determination to maintain a connection to the libertine theatrical life she once led, which now includes a carnal relationship with a woman named Carol (Lily Frazer). “Am I indecent?” Amanda asks teasingly. “No,” says Maud. “You’re lost.”

Amanda pretends to share Maud’s commitment to God. “He’s everywhere,” Maud tells her. “He sees you. He won’t let you fall.” Amanda gazes at her with a small, cruel smirk that Maud doesn’t detect. “My little savior,” Amanda says.

The story takes a sudden turn when we see Maud out on the street one night, being hailed by an old friend (Lily Knight) who calls her by another name. Soon we learn that Maud once lived a very different life, and we watch as she falls back into it with a crash. Alcohol begins to flow, and there are anonymous handjobs in a pub and oblique mention of an unspecified trauma in Maud’s past. (“What happened before, it wasn’t your fault,” says a onetime friend.) The movie swells with a surge of bloody violence toward the end, before delivering a final passage of vivid, poetic force.

The movie is only 84 minutes long, which is just right. Apart from the electric performances of its two leads, director Glass has also drawn striking work from composer Adam Janota Bzowski, whose sparse score (woozy cellos, lowing male chorales) functions as a supporting character in the film, and from Ben Fordesman, whose chiaroscuro photography provides a perfect ground for the film’s burnished interiors and soft, milky skin tones. May all of these people work together again at some point soon.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3ov2vJK
via IFTTT

The Dakota Entrapment Tapes

minisThe-Dakota-Entrapment-TapesAMAZON

On May 1, 2014, 20-year-old Andrew Sadek disappeared from the campus of the North Dakota State College of Science in Wahpeton, where he was about to graduate after training as an electrician. Two months later, police found his body in the Red River near Breckenridge, Minnesota, dead from a gunshot wound to the head and weighed down by a backpack full of rocks.

The Dakota Entrapment Tapes, a Sundance Now documentary, recounts how Sadek’s bewildered parents and friends tried to find out what had happened to the mild-mannered student, who had good grades and no criminal record. They discovered that a federally funded anti-drug task force had tricked Sadek into parting with some pot, which he sold to two confidential informants for a total of $80. The police then pressured him into continuing the cycle of entrapment, which apparently led to his death.

Given the amount of marijuana involved, the Sadek family’s lawyer says, probation was the likely outcome. But Richland County Deputy Sheriff Jason Weber told Sadek he faced up to 40 years in prison unless he became an informant. Weber warned him not to tell anyone what had happened.

Sadek made three deals for Weber and had one to go. He vanished the same day Weber had set as a deadline.

Whether Sadek’s death was a suicide or (more likely) a homicide, it vividly illustrates the senselessness of the war on drugs. “Are you kidding me?” his mother says. “All of this for $80 worth of pot.”

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3t9Y3Ui
via IFTTT

The Dakota Entrapment Tapes

minisThe-Dakota-Entrapment-TapesAMAZON

On May 1, 2014, 20-year-old Andrew Sadek disappeared from the campus of the North Dakota State College of Science in Wahpeton, where he was about to graduate after training as an electrician. Two months later, police found his body in the Red River near Breckenridge, Minnesota, dead from a gunshot wound to the head and weighed down by a backpack full of rocks.

The Dakota Entrapment Tapes, a Sundance Now documentary, recounts how Sadek’s bewildered parents and friends tried to find out what had happened to the mild-mannered student, who had good grades and no criminal record. They discovered that a federally funded anti-drug task force had tricked Sadek into parting with some pot, which he sold to two confidential informants for a total of $80. The police then pressured him into continuing the cycle of entrapment, which apparently led to his death.

Given the amount of marijuana involved, the Sadek family’s lawyer says, probation was the likely outcome. But Richland County Deputy Sheriff Jason Weber told Sadek he faced up to 40 years in prison unless he became an informant. Weber warned him not to tell anyone what had happened.

Sadek made three deals for Weber and had one to go. He vanished the same day Weber had set as a deadline.

Whether Sadek’s death was a suicide or (more likely) a homicide, it vividly illustrates the senselessness of the war on drugs. “Are you kidding me?” his mother says. “All of this for $80 worth of pot.”

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3t9Y3Ui
via IFTTT

Brickbat: First, Do No Harm

Hospitalfootage_1161x653

David Pontone went to Humber River Hospital, a public hospital in Toronto, complaining of excruciating pain in his legs. But as soon as staff discovered he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, they began to treat him for that, not his pain, even though he told them he’d had his bipolar disorder under control for seven years with medication. Eventually, they ordered him out of the hospital. Video shows him crawling out of the hospital with a nurse walking along with him, offering no help. “The nurse kept saying, ‘You’re a big boy! You’re strong! Come on, big boy, stand up!'” said Pontone. A few days later, he saw a psychiatrist, who quickly determined his problems weren’t mental. That doctor sent him by ambulance to another hospital, where a neurologist found Pontone had Guillain-Barré Syndrome, an immune disorder. It took two years and an order by the provincial privacy commission to get the hospital to release the video of Pontone being forced to crawl out of the hospital.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3puGrjY
via IFTTT

Brickbat: First, Do No Harm

Hospitalfootage_1161x653

David Pontone went to Humber River Hospital, a public hospital in Toronto, complaining of excruciating pain in his legs. But as soon as staff discovered he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, they began to treat him for that, not his pain, even though he told them he’d had his bipolar disorder under control for seven years with medication. Eventually, they ordered him out of the hospital. Video shows him crawling out of the hospital with a nurse walking along with him, offering no help. “The nurse kept saying, ‘You’re a big boy! You’re strong! Come on, big boy, stand up!'” said Pontone. A few days later, he saw a psychiatrist, who quickly determined his problems weren’t mental. That doctor sent him by ambulance to another hospital, where a neurologist found Pontone had Guillain-Barré Syndrome, an immune disorder. It took two years and an order by the provincial privacy commission to get the hospital to release the video of Pontone being forced to crawl out of the hospital.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/3puGrjY
via IFTTT

More Judges Take Senior Status In The Week After Inauguration

Yesterday, I blogged about a handful of judge who announced they would take senior status shortly after the inauguration. Today, Law360 reports on more judges who have decided to step down from active service. Here, I will indicate when each judge became eligible for senior status, based on my calculations:

  • Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton (NDCA)—2017
  • Judge Jeffrey S. White (NDCA)—2014
  • Judge William H. Alsup (NDCA)—2012
  • Judge Catherine C. Blake (DMD)—2015
  • Judges Richard D. Bennett (DMD)—2015
  • Judge Ellen L. Hollander (DMD)—2020
  • Judge Ursula Ungaro (SDFL)—2016
  • Judge Dan Aaron Polster (NDOH)—2016
  • Judge Victoria A. Roberts (EDMI)—2016
  • Judge B. Lynn Winmill (DID)—2017
  • Judge Michael W. Mosman—He will turn 65 in December 2021
  • Vanessa D. Gilmore—Will leave the bench when she turns 65 in October 2021

Law360 offers some commentary on the rash of retirements:

“They’re just dropping like flies,” said Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond law professor who tracks judicial nominations.

Nine of the 13 retiring judges were appointed by Democrats — eight by Clinton and one by President Barack Obama. Of the four GOP appointees, three were confirmed when their states had at least one Democratic senator whose support would have been required under Senate traditions.

The flurry of transitions so soon after Biden took office suggests some judges may have been waiting out President Donald Trump: Ten of the 13 judges have been eligible for senior status since at least 2017.

In my forthcoming article, I am considering how to measure the ideology of the judge who takes senior status. The ideology cannot be measured solely on the basis of the appointing President. Because of factors like blue slips and the (former) judicial filibuster, a nominee may be quite distant from the appointing President’s ideology. For example, a George W. Bush nominee in a double-blue state (with two Democratic senators) may be closer to a Clinton nominee in a double-blue state.

Leading Democrats suggest that these judge declined to step down because they didn’t approve of the sorts of judges Trump would appoint in their stead:

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., suggested as much Monday on MSNBC.

“There will be lots of vacancies that come up,” he predicted. “I think there are a lot of judges, Democratic appointees who didn’t take senior status while Trump was president, who now will.”

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, a senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said Wednesday that he thought judges delayed retirement plans because Trump named unqualified lawyers with ideological credentials, in his view.

“I have to believe that there were some judges who looked around at the pool of Trump nominees and, setting aside their political persuasions, thought … ‘We can do better than this gong show of political clowns,'” Whitehouse said on a panel with the liberal Alliance for Justice.

Stay tuned. I will continue to track this issue.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2Mx5WTh
via IFTTT

More Judges Take Senior Status In The Week After Inauguration

Yesterday, I blogged about a handful of judge who announced they would take senior status shortly after the inauguration. Today, Law360 reports on more judges who have decided to step down from active service. Here, I will indicate when each judge became eligible for senior status, based on my calculations:

  • Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton (NDCA)—2017
  • Judge Jeffrey S. White (NDCA)—2014
  • Judge William H. Alsup (NDCA)—2012
  • Judge Catherine C. Blake (DMD)—2015
  • Judges Richard D. Bennett (DMD)—2015
  • Judge Ellen L. Hollander (DMD)—2020
  • Judge Ursula Ungaro (SDFL)—2016
  • Judge Dan Aaron Polster (NDOH)—2016
  • Judge Victoria A. Roberts (EDMI)—2016
  • Judge B. Lynn Winmill (DID)—2017
  • Judge Michael W. Mosman—He will turn 65 in December 2021
  • Vanessa D. Gilmore—Will leave the bench when she turns 65 in October 2021

Law360 offers some commentary on the rash of retirements:

“They’re just dropping like flies,” said Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond law professor who tracks judicial nominations.

Nine of the 13 retiring judges were appointed by Democrats — eight by Clinton and one by President Barack Obama. Of the four GOP appointees, three were confirmed when their states had at least one Democratic senator whose support would have been required under Senate traditions.

The flurry of transitions so soon after Biden took office suggests some judges may have been waiting out President Donald Trump: Ten of the 13 judges have been eligible for senior status since at least 2017.

In my forthcoming article, I am considering how to measure the ideology of the judge who takes senior status. The ideology cannot be measured solely on the basis of the appointing President. Because of factors like blue slips and the (former) judicial filibuster, a nominee may be quite distant from the appointing President’s ideology. For example, a George W. Bush nominee in a double-blue state (with two Democratic senators) may be closer to a Clinton nominee in a double-blue state.

Leading Democrats suggest that these judge declined to step down because they didn’t approve of the sorts of judges Trump would appoint in their stead:

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., suggested as much Monday on MSNBC.

“There will be lots of vacancies that come up,” he predicted. “I think there are a lot of judges, Democratic appointees who didn’t take senior status while Trump was president, who now will.”

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, a senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said Wednesday that he thought judges delayed retirement plans because Trump named unqualified lawyers with ideological credentials, in his view.

“I have to believe that there were some judges who looked around at the pool of Trump nominees and, setting aside their political persuasions, thought … ‘We can do better than this gong show of political clowns,'” Whitehouse said on a panel with the liberal Alliance for Justice.

Stay tuned. I will continue to track this issue.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/2Mx5WTh
via IFTTT