Are ‘Wealthy’ Americans Scrambling To Find Cash To Cover Their Tax Bill?

Every year around this time, Americans face the certainty of tax time, and that means – in general – finding the cash to pay Uncle Sam his just deserts. This scramble for cash is seasonally evident in the variable-rate tax-exempt (Muni) bond market, where the typically wealthy stash their cash, as rates rise into tax time and fall after (as flows come and go). This year however, the scale of the outflows is enormous, spiking money-market fund rates from 1bp to 29bps…

The weekly benchmark for yields in the variable-rate tax-exempt bond market, after being stuck at a record-low 0.01 percent, has surged in the past four weeks: The SIFMA Municipal Swap Index reached 0.29 percent on Wednesday, the highest since January 2011.

Chart: Bloomberg

As Bloomberg notes, while part of the climb mirrors the jump in variable-rate demand note inventory, another reason is the lead-up to the U.S. tax payment deadline of April 15, according to Vikram Rai at Citigroup Inc.

“Money market funds and especially tax-exempt money market funds witness outflows around tax-season as investors tend to sell their near cash alternatives in order to pay their tax bill,” Rai wrote in a report. “We see that the SIFMA index stays elevated about one month before and one month after the tax deadline.”

So, it appears, 2016's tax toll means wealthy Americans are more than ever scrambling for cash to make ends meet.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1MnOQQV Tyler Durden

Why “It’s Hard Being A Bear”

Submitted by Joseph Calhoun via Alhambra Investment Partners,

Global stock markets, especially in the US, have made a furious comeback from the lousy start of the year. At its worst level the S&P 500 was down 11% year to date and 15% from its peak late last spring. At that nadir the market was trading at roughly the same level as November of 2013, over two years of gains wiped out by what appeared to be a nascent bear market. Since bottoming on the 11th of February, the S&P has traded up 13% and is now positive on the year, albeit a small gain. Has the bear been vanquished? Or is he just hibernating?

Despite that rally the market still trades at about the same level as November of 2014, a year salvaged from the lows. You could have collected 10 year Treasury coupons and made about the same as collecting the S&P dividend during that time, avoided the stock market volatility and be sitting on a capital gain to boot.  Over the last two years the returns from the 10 Year Treasury and the S&P 500 are not that dissimilar. The 10 year Treasury has produced a total return of about 11.25% versus the S&P 500’s 12.4%. When one considers the volatility of the stock market versus the bond market, the clear risk adjusted winner is the bond market. So, while the rally has been nice, it hasn’t been enough – yet – to change the math of a decision to remain bearish and underweight stocks.

So, despite the title of the post, it should have been pretty easy being a bear – if you made the decision to own longer duration bonds as an alternative. Of course, not many people have done that as, paradoxically, investors have been almost more afraid of bonds than stocks. I’ve been reading articles about a bond bubble for several years now and that talk pushed investors to the short end of the curve, scared to death that rates were about to spurt higher. This fear of higher rates also pushed investors into floating rate funds, junk and corporate bond funds. And wouldn’t you know it, short term Treasuries have been the worst performing part of the Treasury curve, floating rate funds are barely floating, junk took a big hit although it has made a decent comeback and corporate bonds have offered nothing over the coupon. Beware the consensus trade.

I’ve felt pretty good about how our portfolios have been allocated. We have had more duration in our bond portfolios than most and that has certainly helped and we took profits on the longest duration positions right near the top (see here). We did have a significant portion in TIPS though which only recently started to perform as inflation expectations finally picked up. We also had gold in our portfolios and that helped although you never have enough of the things that go up and always too much of the things that go down. On the stock side we’ve been underweight which has been good but overweight EAFE versus the US which has been bad. But with the dollar weak, I still think that’s the right call.

But now we find ourselves at another crossroad. As I said, stocks are rallying and being underweight gets harder to maintain every day. The bulls are out there yapping about how this was just another correction, another dip to buy and that we better get back in, yada, yada, yada. What makes being bearish so hard is the noise of the perpetually bullish street, the lure of easy money in a market you know is overvalued but keeps going higher. And stocks move so much more quickly than boring old bonds; making the same return in stocks and bonds doesn’t feel the same.

And the economic data has been getting better recently, right? Well, maybe. As I said in last week’s economic review we have seen improvement in the regional Fed surveys and that continued this week with the big jump in the Richmond Fed survey. Unfortunately, as so often happens, the positive of that report was offset by the negative of the Chicago Fed National Activity Index which fell back into negative territory indicating growth below trend. And the CFNAI is one of those broad measures intended to give a quick overview of the entire economy rather than just one region like the Richmond or Philly Fed reports. And it is actual data rather than surveys with small sample sizes like the regional Fed surveys.

We’ve also seen some slippage in the two areas of the economy that have been unambiguously good the last couple of years, autos and housing. As I noted last week, autos are not adding anything to the growth in retail sales and the inventory to sales ratio for the industry is elevated, near the high end of its historical range, close to 3 to 1. Indeed, inventories would seem to still present a headwind for an economy already growing below trend. An economy I might add that has performed poorly enough to produce the Trump phenomenon which is, more than anything, based on the economic angst of the not 1%. Housing also seems to be struggling some with existing home sales falling back, year over year sales gains down to just 2.2% from double digits last month. Housing starts have been okay but permits have flattened out and new home sales are down over 6% from last year.

There are some other bright spots. Personal income has been growing although savings seems the more preferred disposition at the moment. The employment picture is still okay although the quality and quantity of jobs does still leave a lot to be desired; it could be better but at least it’s a positive. Unemployment claims are still near cycle lows and despite the Phillips curve rhetoric from the Fed, inflation continues to be a non-factor – for now.

Overall, as I said last week, it doesn’t seem the economic picture has changed all that much. What has changed is the value of the dollar and the expected path of monetary policy. The weaker dollar has pushed up commodity prices and the stock prices of companies in associated industries. Specifically, the rise of the market over the last five weeks has been led by energy stocks which makes sense given they were a big part of the problem on the way down. Credit spreads have narrowed along with the rising price of oil as investors get optimistic – possibly too optimistic – about the fate of the shale oil industry.

Is a rally based on a weakening dollar sustainable? If you think about what drove the market lower, one is tempted to answer yes. How many earnings reports have we seen the last year that were negatively impacted by the strong dollar? Multinational companies with a lot of non-dollar revenue have been a big part of the earnings decline, which will likely total 4 consecutive quarters when Q1 numbers are released. If the dollar pulls back, theoretically some of that should be relieved. Of course, that assumes those companies didn’t do something to mitigate the damage of a strong dollar. How many of them hedged their exposure and will now be reporting losses on those hedges? I can’t answer that but it does show how difficult it is to operate globally in a floating exchange rate world.

With US valuations still on the expensive side and earnings estimates still falling, it is hard to see the S&P 500 making new highs. The weaker dollar does take some pressure off the oil industry but it doesn’t change the fundamental picture of way too much supply and not enough growth to offset the glut. Even if the dollar weakens more I think oil prices may well have another leg lower before finding a durable bottom. If that happens, credit spreads will widen again and we’ll do this whole correction/bear market dance again. Would wider spreads and more defaults in the oil patch be enough to push us into recession? As I’ve said many times, I don’t know. I don’t think so but frankly it may be a close call.

If the dollar does stay weak and the US manages to avoid recession then the more attractive investments are probably found outside the US. A falling dollar – or put another way, a rising Euro or Yen or Real Or $A – will certainly put the wind at the back of investors in non-dollar assets. A weak dollar could also be a positive for commodities other than oil that have worked off their fundamental excesses. And gold will be likely be in demand as well if the greenback continues south.

Short and intermediate term momentum has shifted to a buy for Asia ex-Japan, Latin America and emerging markets generally. Long term indicators still favor the US market but if the dollar falls through support that may well change. Europe continues to lag but we’ve seen hints of economic improvement there recently. Certainly any improvement is merely cyclical and not secular but a cyclical upturn in Europe should allow investors to make some money.

I will continue to follow our indicators, a majority of which are still negative. Credit spreads have narrowed but not enough to reverse our defensive posture. The yield curve has steepened a bit lately which is positive but it is ever so slight and we still don’t know how to interpret the 10/2 curve in a ZIRP world. Valuations, as I said, are still rich versus historical norms. And long term momentum still favors bonds and gold over stocks, a trend that I suspect has further to go (particularly the gold trend). Unless credit spreads continue to narrow, I doubt I’ll be upping our risk allocations any time soon. What seems more likely is a continued move toward investments that benefit from a weak dollar.

It is always hard to buck the crowd, to be a bear when the market is up this much, this fast. That’s why you need to have indicators you can turn to, ones that have stood the test of time, that are not influenced by the Wall Street bullish cacophony. Like JM Keynes I change my mind when the facts change. Despite the rally, the facts – at least for now – still favor the bears.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1VJtvU7 Tyler Durden

The Cyprus Template for Bail-ins Comes to Canada, Next Up the US

Canada has joined the “bail-in” posse.

 

Canada will introduce legislation to implement a "bail-in" regime for systemically important banks that would shift some of the responsibility for propping up failing institutions to creditors.

 

The proposed plan outlined in the federal budget released on Tuesday would allow authorities to convert eligible long-term debt of a failing lender into common shares in order to recapitalize the bank, allowing it to remain operating.

           

Source: CNBC

 

The above story suggests that only bondholders would be at risk of a bail-in but we all know that is just some sugar to make what’s coming go down easier.

 

What’s coming?

 

Savings deposits being used to bail-in banks. Legislation is in the works in Canada, New Zealand, the UK, Germany, and even the US to do precisely this.

 

This whole template was laid out in Europe in 2012. Europe is ground zero for Keynesian Central Planning: a massive welfare state overseen by non-elected officials and Central Bankers who willingly break the rule of law whenever it suits them,

 

The guinea pig for the template was Cyprus.

 

The quick timeline for what happened in Cyprus is as follows:

 

·      June 25, 2012: Cyprus formally requests a bailout from the EU.

·      November 24, 2012: Cyprus announces it has reached an agreement with the EU the bailout process once Cyprus banks are examined by EU officials (ballpark estimate of capital needed is €17.5 billion).

·      February 25, 2013: Democratic Rally candidate Nicos Anastasiades wins Cypriot election defeating his opponent, an anti-austerity Communist.

·      March 16 2013: Cyprus announces the terms of its bail-in: a 6.75% confiscation of accounts under €100,000 and 9.9% for accounts larger than €100,000… a bank holiday is announced.

·      March 17 2013: emergency session of Parliament to vote on bailout/bail-in is postponed.

·      March 18 2013: Bank holiday extended until March 21 2013.

·      March 19 2013: Cyprus parliament rejects bail-in bill.

·      March 20 2013: Bank holiday extended until March 26 2013.

·      March 24 2013: Cash limits of €100 in withdrawals begin for largest banks in Cyprus.

·      March 25 2013: Bail-in deal agreed upon. Those depositors with over €100,000 either lose 40% of their money (Bank of Cyprus) or lose 60% (Laiki).

 

The most important thing we want you to focus on is how lies and propaganda were spread for months leading up to the collapse. Then in the space of a single weekend, the whole mess came unhinged and accounts were frozen.

 

One weekend. The process was not gradual. It was sudden and it was total: once it began in earnest, the banks were closed and you couldn’t get your money out.

 

Depositors lost between 40% and 60% of their savings above €100,000 as it was converted into bank equity. However, once it became equity, it could go to ZERO just like any stock.

 

That’s precisely what happened.

 

Account holders at Bank of Cyprus lost almost half their money above the €100,000 level, receiving stock in the bank as compensation. Those shares have since plummeted in value.

 

Uninsured depositors in Laiki Bank, also known as Cyprus Popular Bank, the nation’s second-largest lender, lost everything because the bank failed.

 

Source: NY TIMES.

 

As for those trying to get their money out of Cyprus, it took TWO YEARS before the final capital controls were lifted.

 

And the last remaining restrictions on transfers of money outside of Cyprus, imposed two years ago, will be lifted next month (APRIL 2015), said Chrystalla Georghadji, the governor of the country's central bank.

 

Source: NY TIMES.

 

So… depositors had 40% to 60% of their deposits above €100,000 converted into bank equity… equity which could then go to ZERO… and those who tried to get their money out of the country had restrictions in place for TWO YEARS.

 

This is the template for what’s going to be implemented globally in the coming months.  When push comes to shove, it will be taxpayers, NOT Central Banks who are on the hook for the next round of bailouts.

Indeed, we've uncovered a secret document outlining how the Feds plan to take hold of savings during the next round of the crisis to stop individuals from getting their money out.

 

We detail this paper and outline three investment strategies you can implement right now to protect your capital from this sinister plan in our Special Report

Survive the Fed's War on Cash.

 

We are making 1,000 copies available for FREE the general public.

 

To pick up yours, swing by….

http://ift.tt/1eaWvC8

 

Best Regards

Phoenix Capital Research

Our FREE e-letter: http://ift.tt/QHtIFM

Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/GainsPainsCapit

 

 

 

 

 

 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1XQ8SEn Phoenix Capital Research

Chinese Take Over Canada’s Real Estate Market, Buy One-Third Of All Vancouver Homes Sold In 2015

“Housing in Vancouver is insane — it was insane when I left and it’s more insane now.”

That’s from 33-year-old Kevin Oke, co-founder of LlamaZoo Interactive who left Vancouver for Victoria two years ago because he couldn’t afford to buy a home in his native city even while earning a generous salary as a lead designer at a video-game company whose clients included Atari and Ubisoft Entertainment SA.  

Kevin isn’t the only one leaving. Vancouver added only 884 net new people age 18-24 last year according to Statistics Canada, and many observers worry the soaring cost of housing will eventually strip the city of its burgeoning tech economy.

(a representative listing from Point Grey)

We’ve spilled quite a bit of digital ink documenting the “three-alarm fire” (to quote Bank of Montreal chief economist Doug Porter) that’s burning in British Columbia’s housing market. Here, for those who missed it, are some informative posts:

According to the Greater Vancouver Real Estate Board, residential property sales in Greater Vancouver rose 31.7% in January, 46% above the 10-year sales average for the first month of the year and the second highest January ever. The benchmark price for a detached home in Vancouver: $1,293,700. The benchmark price for an apartment: $456,600. The latest data from the Canadian Real Estate Association shows the average price of a home in Canada rose an astonishing 16% Y/Y last month to more than $500,000. Underscoring the extent to which British Columbia and Ontario are driving the market, stripping out those two provinces pulls the national average down to under $300,000

Prices in Vancouver surged 26% in February. 

So what’s behind the inexorable rise? How is it possible that “fixer uppers” like the residence shown above go for $2,500,000? It’s very simple. Chinese worried about continued market turmoil and a weaker RMB, are moving money out of the country. As CAD slid against USD, Chinese “investors” found Canadian real estate to be comparably priced vis-a-vis US real estate in USD terms. Wealthy Chinese funneled their dollars into the Canadian market, driving up prices. In short: capital flight from China has created a massive housing bubble in cities like Toronto and Vancouver. Throw in the fact that some of these locales – like Waterloo, Ontario – are becoming tech hubs, and you have the recipe for overheating markets.

Just how prevalent is Chinese buying, you ask? Well according to National Bank’s Peter Routledge who did some “back of the envelope” calculations, fully one-third of all Vancouver real estate purchased in Vancouver last year was bought by Chinese investors.

Chinese investors spent about C$12.7 billion ($9.6 billion) on real estate in the western Canadian city in 2015, or 33 percent of its C$38.5 billion in total sales,” Bloomberg writes, citing Routledge and analysts Parham Fini and Paul Poon who “extrapolated from a Financial Times survey of 77 high-end buyers and data from the U.S. National Association of Realtors.” Here’s a bit more from The Globe And Mail:

Without any Canadian-specific data on foreign investors to go on, the economists came up with their estimates by extrapolating from two international surveys of realtors and buyers.

 

One is an annual report on the level of foreign home-buyer investment by the National Association of Realtors, based on surveys of real estate agents in the United States. It estimates that Chinese investors bought $28.6-billion (U.S.) of real estate in the U.S. housing market between March, 2014, and March, 2015, a seven-fold increase from the $4.1-billion they spent in 2009.

 

The second is a multiple-choice survey by the Financial Times of 77 wealthy Chinese investors who had bought real estate outside of China. Of those, 33.5 per cent said they bought homes in United States, while 11.7 per cent invested in Vancouver and 8.3 per cent in Toronto.

 

Combining the two surveys, the economists estimate that Chinese investors spent roughly $9-billion (Canadian) on home sales in the Greater Toronto Area last year, or 14 per cent of all total sales volume in the region.

 

In the Greater Vancouver Area, they estimate Chinese investors spent $12.7-billion – or 33 per cent of total sales. That figure, they say, lines up with research from B.C. urban planner Andy Yan, who found that 66 per cent of all sales of 172 detached homes in three west-side Vancouver neighbourhoods within a six-month period were to buyers with non-Anglicized Chinese names.

 

The economists admit their survey is somewhat unscientific, but say such attempts highlight the importance of collecting better data on the influence of foreign investment, and even immigration, on housing market affordability.

“Lacking adequate Canadian data to address this issue, we revert to data produced in other countries (primarily the United States) and derive inferences or hypotheses for Canada,” Routledge explains. “The National Association of Realtors (NAR) in the U.S. produces an annual profile of international home buying activity. The NAR defines an international buyer as either (1) a non-resident foreigner, or (2) a resident foreigner – i.e., recent immigrants (in the country for less than two years) or temporary visa holders (residing in the country for at least six months).” Here’s more from the note:

As illustrated in Figure 1, the NAR estimates that buyers from China invested US$28.6 billion in U.S.-domiciled residential real estate properties over the 12 months ending March 31, 2015, up from just US$4.1 billion in 2009.

 

 

We infer from this data, therefore, that the purchase volume for buyers from China in Toronto and Vancouver in 2015 must be some proportion of the U.S. figure of US$28.6 billion. The question is: what proportion?

 

 

Figure 2, we depict the results of a multiple choice survey the Financial Times solicited from 77 high net worth and affluent individuals from China (admittedly not a statistically significant sample size). Of those who had purchased residential real estate outside China, 33.5% had done so in the United States, 11.7% in Vancouver, and 8.3% in Toronto. From this survey data, one could hypothesize that for every four high net worth investors from China who purchase a U.S. residence, one purchases a residence in Toronto; and for every three high net worth investors from China who purchase a U.S. residence, one purchases a residence in Vancouver. One can then apply these ratios to the NAR’s estimate of US$28.6 billion in U.S. residential real estate investment made by buyers from China. From this, we hypothesize that, in 2015, homebuyers from China invested ~US$9.9 billion / Cdn$12.7 billion in Vancouver residential real estate (on a total 2015 residential real estate purchase volume in greater Vancouver of Cdn$38.5 billion, according to the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver); this amounts to 33% of total purchase volume.

 

Routledge and co.’s bar napkin figure is alarming to say the least and underscores the need for Canadian officials to monitor the situation more closely before foreign investors price everyone completely out of the market. “Currently it is not possible to fully understand the role of foreign homebuyers in Canada’s housing market since a comprehensive and reliable data set on the number of homes sold to foreign homebuyers does not exist,” the country’s 2016 budget says. Canada will devote CAD500,000 to “solving” the data collection problem:

Budget 2016 proposes to address this data gap by allocating $500,000 to Statistics Canada in 2016–17 to develop methods for gathering data on purchases of Canadian housing by foreign homebuyers. This initiative could involve collaboration with the provinces, such as British Columbia, which recently announced its intention to have homebuyers disclose whether they are citizens or permanent residents of Canada or another country.

Right. CAD500,000. That should do it. “Investing only 25.7 percent of the cost of an average price of a detached home in Vancouver is, at the very least, a touch on the low side,” Routledge remarked, dryly.

It sure is. Especially considering that the need to closely monitor developments in Vancouver and other “three alarm fire” markets is only going to grow in the months and years ahead as China’s hard landing continues to necessitate an ever weaker RMB to juice flagging exports. Meanwhile, the effort to stamp out overcapacity in China’s industrial sector will invariably put enormous pressure on the country’s banking system which is laboring under a mountainous pile of NPLs, the true size of which no one fully understands. Once the bad loan burden finally becomes too much to shoulder (which it will once the half trillion in receivables on Chinese companies’ balance sheets create an intractable working capital problem), the PBoC will be forced to recap the banks at an enormous cost that, if Kyle Bass is correct, will lead to a 40% plunge in the yuan. All of that means more capital flight and more Chinese buyers for prime Canadian real estate. 

With Canadians now sitting on the highest debt-to-income ratio of any G7 country and with 50% of Canadians admitting they are within $200/month of being unable to pay their bills, it wouldn’t take much in the way of higher housing prices to put a severe strain on household balance sheets. And it’s not exactly like Stephen Poloz can cut rates much further unless he wants cucumbers to cost CAD10 each.

But don’t despair Canadian home buyers. There are bargains aplenty in Alberta…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1PtmGPc Tyler Durden

‘Caged’ Refugees Say They Will Jump In Sea If Deported

Submitted by Oscar Webb via MiddleEastEye.net,

Beko stood outside the Moria centre, trying to make sense of where to go next after a controversial plan to send migrants and refugees from Europe back to their countries came into effect earlier this week.

The 28-year-old from Baghdad, his Syrian wife and their two-month-old son are among hundreds of people who have arrived on dinghys and boats to Greece in recent days, after a deadline for the new EU-Turkey deal passed at midnight on Sunday.

For now, Beko's family and others are detained in Greek islands camps like Moria. Protests broke out here on Tuesday among an estimated 1,000 waiting to see whether Greek and European immigration authorities will allow them to apply for asylum in Greece or deport them back to Turkey when they are expected to start enforcing the plan on 4 April.

"We don’t need a rich country, we just need somewhere safe," Beko said, declining to give his last name. "We don’t need Germany even. If Greece can give me a room or something, a future, somewhere safe, we’ll stay here. If we can’t stay here, I’ll throw myself in the sea."

"Turkey is a bad country, sorry about that, but it’s a bad country," he said. "If they send us back from Turkey, Turkey will send us back to Iraq or Syria. We’ll die in Iraq, we’ll die in Syria."

As the protest erupted, recent arrivals yelled "We want papers!" and "Where are our human rights?" Greek police donned riot gear in preparation for violence, but the situation remained fairly calm. 

The agreement has sparked criticism from the UN's refugee agency, which has said the plan violates human rights, and earlier this week suspended its activities in closed reception centres on the island that it said had become detention centres.

On Tuesday, the NGO Doctors Without Borders (MSF) announced it had suspended its activities in Moria, saying it refused to be part of a system that "has no regard for the humanitarian or protection needs of asylum seekers and migrants".

"Continuing to work inside would make us complicit in a system we consider to be both unfair and inhumane," Marie Elisabeth Ingres, MSF's Head of Mission in Greece, said in a statement.

Beko said he and his wife had been temporarily let out of the camp on Tuesday to visit a dentist in Mytilini, the capital of the island 10km away, and were about to go back into the centre.

"Inside here, it’s like a disaster. It’s like a prison," he said. "We sleep in a UN shelter, without a stove or heaters, just with one blanket each and on the ground. It’s very cold but what can we do? We don’t know about our future."

In the harbour at Mytilini, ferries continue to take a small number of refugees who arrived on the island before the Sunday deadline to the Greek mainland. On Tuesday night, as another ferry launched, volunteers and activists shouted and waved goodbye.

One hundred metres away, several dozen refugees who had tried to sneak onto the ferry with fake papers, sat despondently in Frontex vans and Greek police coaches as the boat pulled away. Soon after, they were driven back to Moria to await their fate with thousands of others.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1VJhL4b Tyler Durden

The Next Critical Level For The S&P: Stay Above 2,028 Or Channel Support Is Broken

Yesterday we presented the latest note from UBS’ technical analysts, Michael Riesner and Marc Muller, who said now that the S&P had hit their near-term top target of 2,050, it was time to “sell” the “most overbought market since 2009.” We suggested that, based on their recent accurate track record, that it would be prudent to follow their advice instead of Gartmaning it. So far they have been correct.

So what are the key technicals levels from this point on, and what do the charts say now? For the answer we turn to BofA technical analyst Stephen Suttmeier who has just released a note in which he warns that “daily price & breadth momentum waning. Watch S&P 500 channel support at 2028 – a close below would be a bearish sign.” He also adds that “similar to early November, daily MACD at 1998-2000 overbought as breadth momentum shows a bearish divergence.”

In other words, the technicals are going from bad to worse, that another round of unexpected flip-flop jawboning from a Fed president may be needed to prop up the S&P 500 as it prepares to turnaround once again, putting all the central banks back in the corner once again.

Here are the details:

Late-Mar vs. early-Nov déjà vu charts

Daily momentum waning, watch SPX 2028 channel support

The S&P 500 is stalling below 2085 as daily momentum for price action and especially market breadth is waning. Similar to early November, confirmation of a near-term S&P 500 peak could come on a close below rising channel support near 2028 with daily Williams %R moving out of overbought. This would place the focus on the 200 and 100- day MAs near 2017 and 1997, respectively, which are ahead of chart support at 1969- 1947. Should the channel hold, resistances come in at 2056.60 (Tuesday’s high), 2085 (double bottom count), and 2100 (channel resistance). Note that we would continue to view a failure below 2085 as a confirmation of a bear market rally.

 

Daily MACD back at 1998-2000 overbought levels

Violent swings in the S&P 500 have pushed daily MACD to oversold extremes similar to 2011 as well as to overbought extremes similar to 1998-2000. Daily MACD is back at these overbought extremes. It took two months for daily MACD to go from oversold to overbought moving into both early November and late March. Momentum shifted from the “is the world falling apart” bearish side of the boat to the “can we break out to new highs” bullish side, but the boat has not yet tipped in either direction as the S&P 500 remains range-bound between the 1800 and 2100 areas.

 

Momentum for market breadth is breaking down

The McClellan Oscillator is market breadth momentum indicator. Similar to early November, the NYSE McClellan Oscillator has lower highs vs. higher highs on the S&P 500 and shows a negative divergence. This coincided with the November peak and was confirmed by the loss of the late August uptrend line in the McClellan Oscillator. The pattern now is eerily similar to early November as the McClellan Oscillator shows a bearish divergence and has broken below its uptrend from January.

 

Breadth: % of SPX stocks above 10dmas breaks down

Another sign of a loss of momentum for market breadth is that fewer S&P 500 stocks are above 10-day moving averages (dmas) now vs. one month ago. This is similar to early November when lower highs for the % of stocks above 10dmas coincided with higher highs on the S&P 500 and set up a bearish non-confirmation or divergence (just like the one on the NYSE McClellan Oscillator (Chart 3)). The breakdown below the  late- February and mid-March lows on the % of stocks above 10dmas may have similar bearish implications as the early-November breakdown below the late-October low.

Source: Bank of America


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1RnP7Cl Tyler Durden

The 8 Major Problems The Next President Will Face

Authored by John Mauldin of MauldinEconomics.com,

Dear Donald and Hillary:

In around ten months, one of you will wake up as Mr. or Mrs. President. After the fabulous fun of post-inaugural balls, you will walk into the Oval Office on Saturday, January 22 and launch into your first 90 days in office.

During these days, you will want to deliver on as many of your promises as possible. But instead of shadowboxing with hypothetical futures on a debate stage, you’re going to be up against cold, hard reality.

My suspicion is that six months into your presidency you will begin to wonder why you ever wanted this job, as the gulf deepens and widens between what you wanted to do and what you can do without unintended consequences.

To make your job just a little more manageable, what I would like to do is take you around the world and review some of the economic realities faced by our global partners.

For many of them, those realities are not pretty. They may be far more limited in what they can do to respond to your proposed agenda than either they or you would like.

First, let’s do a quick overflight of the economic problems you will have to deal with in various regions the world.

Problem #1: Japan

Japan has run up a debt of almost 250% of GDP, and that monumental debt is growing every year. Japan’s deficit stands at nearly 8% of GDP, the equivalent of a $1.2 trillion deficit in the US.

The country’s nominal rate of GDP growth has remained almost flat for 25 years, the result of unrelenting deflation. The Japanese 10-year bond market used to be one of the most liquid in the world.

Now, if the Bank of Japan is not in the market, there is literally no trading. If the Bank of Japan were not buying bonds, interest rates would rise precipitously; and the government of Japan would be bankrupt in short order.

In order to avoid a deflationary depression, Japan is monetizing not only its deficit, but a great deal of its outstanding debt. This move has of course pushed the Japanese yen down against the dollar—by some 40% in the past few years.

The problem is that Japan has no choice but to continue down that path.

As an aside, most mainstream US economists (the very economists you will likely turn to for advice) are telling Japan that it needs to do more quantitative easing, not less. The yen is likely to become markedly weaker on your watch; and, frankly, there is very little you can do about it without sending Japan even further into recession/depression.

Such an event in Japan would have serious impacts on global growth and trade. (We’ll get into some details below as to what your options are.)

Problem #2: China

Like Japan, China has a massive debt problem. But unlike the people of Japan, the majority of China’s citizens still live in abject poverty.

In a distortion of capitalism, China has built massive excess capacity in a number of manufacturing industries and will now be forced to lay off millions of people or plunge even deeper into the debt abyss.

There are significant outflows of Chinese currency as wealthier citizens look to get out of a currency they are worried about.

China is at the point in its evolution where it must shift to a consumer-driven economy, though that transition is nearly always tumultuous. In short, Chinese leaders have much less room to maneuver than everyone might wish.

Problem #3: Australia

As China changes course from a manufacturing powerhouse to a consumer-oriented nation, Australia is seeing its commodities industries suffer. Plus, Australia’s housing market is priced very high by global standards, and people have a large amount of debt attached to their homes.

While there are not many direct economic consequences for the United States, Australia has been a reliable ally, and the Aussie economy is going to come under pressure.

Problem #4: The Middle East

The Middle East is always a nightmare for US presidents, but you are going to inherit some especially nasty problems. The low price of oil is putting immense pressure on national budgets. Some experts expect Saudi Arabia to literally run out of money by the end of your term (read Mauldin Economics’ report on the Saudi Arabian crisis).

Yes, Saudi leaders can and probably will make adjustments, but the new economic restrictions are going to impair their ability to be part of any coalition to bring stability to the region. And the same problem affects most of our smaller but still important allies in the Muslim world.

Problem #5: Russia

Economically Russia is not as important as Japan, China, or Europe; but geopolitically it certainly is. Russia simply cannot afford to let the oil price remain below $40 or even $50. Any further downturns in the price of oil will put enormous pressure on President Putin. Russia’s developing financial crisis will continue to make that nation ever less predictable.

Problem #6: Europe

Outside of domestic concerns, Europe is going to demand your greatest focus. During your first term, it is likely that Europe will descend into a crisis that will force the EU either to break up or to mutualize and then monetize its debts—which would then trigger enormous volatility in the currency markets.

The topic of massive nonperforming loans at Italian banks (~20% of loans) will move to the forefront at the very beginning of your term if not before. This will be a debt crisis much worse than we saw in Greece.

Many small and medium-sized German banks also have severe problems. And let’s not forget France and Spain, which are teetering economically and politically. Europe’s economic problems are only going to make the fallout from its immigration crisis worse and severely limit the ability of our allies to join us in a coalition to resolve crises elsewhere in the world.

Be thankful Great Britain is not in as dire a shape as Europe is; you may well need the Brits on your side.

Problem #7: The Americas

It is distinctly possible that Canada could roll over into recession during your first term, and low-priced oil is certainly not helping Mexico, either. The peso is down 50% since the middle of 2013. Brazil is a mess. Its currency is also down 50% in less than four years, and there is no reason it couldn’t fall further. Brazil is likely heading into its deepest recession in over 100 years, which will drag down its neighbors.

Problem #8: The United States

The US economy is growing by less than 2% annually, and there are reasons to think the economy is slowing further—into the 1% range. We have already waded through the third-longest recovery period in history without a recession; and if by chance you manage to avoid a recession during your first term, the current recovery will become the longest recession-free period in American history.

A Recession is Inevitable

Given the worries I have already mentioned concerning the rest of the world and its impact on us, it is likely that you will have to deal with a recession. As part of your transition process you might want to think about what a stimulus package would look like during a recession. Monetary policy is clearly not going to be enough this time, but you can count on this Fed to give you even more monetary stimulus.

A recession will mean that the US fiscal deficit blows out, and deficit hawks are going to be very wary of fiscal stimulus after the last attempt in 2009–2010, which produced very little in the way of measurable results. You will have anti-recession options, but they are limited.

By the end of your first term, it is very possible that tax revenues will cover only entitlement spending, the defense budget, and net interest—meaning that any other parts of the budget will have to be borrowed.

To avoid that crisis, you will have to implement significant entitlement reforms or a major tax increase. Either option will be painful, needless to say; and unfortunately, the politicians who governed before you generally put off the serious issues that are going to come to the fore on your watch.

The possibility of growing our way out of the budgetary problem, which is the usual political answer, is not going to be realistic without significant tax, entitlement, and regulatory reforms, all of which are controversial.

Oh, and income inequality and the pressure on jobs will likely worsen without a serious change in course.

And you want this job why?


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1MnFV21 Tyler Durden

“Worst May Be To Come” Services PMI Signals “Softest Expansion Of New Business Since 2009”

Having blamed the weather for the Services PMI collapse into contractionary levels in February, the very modesty rebound (from 49.7 to 51.0) is a big let down: "The lack of a strong rebound in service sector activity in March is a big disappointment, as bad weather had been blamed for part of the weakness in the first two months of the year." Indeed, confidence remains subdued and as Markit warns "The US economy is going through its worst growth spell for three and a half years…and the worst may be to come as the greatest concern is the near-stalling of new business growth."

The average reading for the first three months of 2016 (51.3) revealed the slowest quarterly pace of expansion since Q3 2012.

 

Commenting on the flash PMI data, Chris Williamson, chief economist at Markit said:

“The US economy is going through its worst growth spell for three and a half years.

 

“The lack of a strong rebound in service sector activity in March is a big disappointment, as bad weather had been blamed for part of the weakness in the first two months of the year.

 

“Combined with the lacklustre performance seen in manufacturing, the subdued services survey points to the weakest quarterly expansion of the economy since the third quarter of 2012. The PMI surveys suggest the economy grew at a worryingly meagre 0.7% annualised rate in the first quarter.

 

“Worst may be to come. The greatest concern is the near-stalling of new business growth. Demand for goods and services is growing at the slowest rate seen this side of the global financial crisis. It’s not surprising therefore that companies lack pricing power, as reflected in a near-stagnation of average selling prices in recent months.

 

One positive is that the rate of hiring remained impressively resilient, signalling another month of 200,000 non-farm payroll growth in March. However, such strong hiring at a time of weak output growth suggests productivity is trending down at the fastest rate seen over the past six years.”

Sounds to us like someone is peddling some fiction…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Ptg03w Tyler Durden

Stocks Slammed Into Red For 2016; Bond Yields Plunge Most In 6 Months; Gold Bouncing Back

The last two days have seen 30Y yields plunge over 12bps (the biggest move since September’s Fed fold) to one-month lows. At the same time, thanks to The Fed’s hawkish jawboning, stocks are dumping also with The Dow joining the rest in the red for 2016. Gold is rallying back from its monkey-hammering yesterday but remains the laggard post-Fed.

 

 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1o8FYmJ Tyler Durden

The Latest Key Developments In The Brussels Terror Attacks

Two days after the tragic terrorist attacks in Brussles, the situation remains extremely fluid, with the largest concern being that more sleeper cells may be activated especially since the third man who participated at the Zaventerm airport suicide bombing is still at large. Here, courtesy of the Guardian and Politico, are the most recent key developments out of Belgium.

  • Police are still looking for one man who left a large bomb at Zaventem airport Tuesday and fled the scene. Unconfirmed reports in Belgian media Thursday said that a second man participated in the attack at Maalbeek metro, but that it isn’t known if he died or is still at large.
  • A lawyer for Salah Abdeslam, the surviving member of November’s attacks on Paris says his client didn’t know of the plans to attack Brussels. Sven Mary also said Abdeslam no longer plans to fight an extradition request and wants to return to France as soon as possible.
  • Belgium police are working to identify a man filmed in the company of metro train bomber Khalid el-Bakraoui shortly before he blew himself up. France’s Le Monde and the Belgian broadcaster RTBF said the man was carrying a big bag and was considered a potential fifth attacker.
  • Najim Laachraoui has been tentatively identified as the second airport bomber by French and Belgian media reports, but this has not been confirmed. Reports on Tuesday that he had escaped and was later arrested proved to be wrong. 
  • The identity of a third man seen at Zavantem airport has not yet been established. Officials said he is thought to have fled the scene after his own bomb failed to detonate. A manhunt is underway.
  • Turkey said it had deported Ibrahim el-Bakraoui to the Netherlands in the summer of 2015 and had warned Belgium that he was a suspected foreign fighter. An official told Reuters that Bakraoui was deported a second time in August.
  • 31 people are confirmed to have died in the two attacks, and 300 wounded. Of these, 150 are still being treated in hospitals, 61 of whom are in intensive care. Four patients remain unidentified.
  • Three people have so far been officially identified among the dead: Adelma Tapia Ruiz, Leopold Hecht and Oliver Delespesse. Two unnamed Moroccans are reported to have died, as fears grow for those missing including Briton David Dixon and Indian Raghavendran Ganesh.
  • Rob Wainwright, the head of Europol has warned that a network of at least 5,000 terrorists suspects is more dangerous than previously feared. He confirmed the connection of the Brussels bombers to November’s attacks in Paris and warned of new “aggressive” strategy by Islamic State militants to attack Europe.
  • Justice Minister Koen Geens said that he did not know about the communication from Turkey on Brahim el-Bakraoui, one of the Brussels attacks suspects. He had been arrested in Turkey last year and deported, but Belgium ignored warnings that he was a “foreign terrorist fighter,” Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdo?an said Wednesday. “It is only normal that a Justice Minister does not know what happens on embassies. We could not know this.”
  • Broadcaster VTM reports that both Belgian Interior Minister Jan Jambon and Justice Minister Koen Geens had presented their resignation to Prime Minister Charles Michel yesterday, but that Michel refused. Jambon wanted to “take responsibility” news agency Belga understands.
  • The Dutch parliament will this afternoon discuss the Brussels attacks. Turkish President Erdogan said yesterday that el-Bakraoui was arrested at the Turkish-Syrian border and deported to the Netherlands last year. There is still much confusion about the facts. Justice Minister Ard van der Steur said: “We’re just trying to get the facts right so that we can inform the parliament,” said Van der Steur. The Dutch government will meet this afternoon, followed by a debate in parliament at 17.30.
  • Travelers going to Gare Centrale and Gare du Midi have to be prepared for queues before they can enter two of Brussels’ central train stations, with military and police staff checking luggage and handbags at the sealed entrances.

Source: Politico, Guardian


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1pA2eHh Tyler Durden