Trump Says “Taking Serious Look At Policy Options” On Amazon, Unaware Of Stormy Daniels Payment

Speaking to a group of reporters while traveling back to Washington from a tax policy round table in West Virginia, Trump said he was taking a “very serious look” at policies that might impact online retailer Amazon.com.

The remarks fit what has by now become a familiar pattern. Trump threatens some action against Amazon, which of course is owned by Trump nemesis Jeff Bezos, the world’s richest man. Then, the White House communications department walks it back, saying there are no immediate plans to alter any policies that would affect Amazon.

However, today that pattern was disrupted when Larry Kudlow, Trump’s new top economic advisor, said the president’s concerns were “very reasonable.”

“You look at the sales tax situation which is going to be taken up I guess very soon, there’s going to be a decision from the Supreme Court,” Trump said. “So we’ll see what happens. The Post Office is not doing well with Amazon that I can tell you.”

“The playing field has to be level for everybody,” he said.

But Amazon wasn’t the only offhanded controversial remark made by Trump at this informal meeting with the press pool. For the perhaps the second time ever, Trump himself chimed in on the Stormy Daniels controversy, saying he was unaware of the $130,000 payment to the former adult film actress which has been characterized as a “hush payment”. He had previously spoken about it only to deny the affair.

“You have to ask Michael Cohen,” Trump said to reporters aboard Air Force One. “Michael’s my attorney and you’ll have to ask Michael.”

Trump also said that he’s supportive of EPA Chief Scott Pruitt following revelations that he accepted what appears to be a subsidized rental from the wife of a prominent lobbyist in an industry Pruitt is supposed to regulate.

After saying he would send the military to protect the Southern border until his promised wall is built, Trump clarified that he expects to send 2,000 to 4,000 national guard troops to the border.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2GGuUHJ Tyler Durden

Facebook Sent “Top Secret” Doctor To Hospitals For Patient Data Collection Scheme

Facebook sent a cardiologist to several major U.S. hospitals to pitch a scheme that would combine a patient’s medical file with user data collected by the beleaguered social media giant, in order to “figure out which patients might need special care or treatment,” reports CNBC

The program, which “never progressed passed the planning phase” according to Facebook, was put on pause after the Cambridge Analytica data harvesting scandal raised concerns over the company’s policies governing data collection and use. 

Facebook’s pitch, according to two people who heard it and one who is familiar with the project, was to combine what a health system knows about its patients (such as: person has heart disease, is age 50, takes 2 medications and made 3 trips to the hospital this year) with what Facebook knows (such as: user is age 50, married with 3 kids, English isn’t a primary language, actively engages with the community by sending a lot of messages). –CNBC

Recently as last month, however, Facebook was discussing the program with several health organizations – including Stanford Medical School and American College of Cardiology.

The company says that the shared data would have personally identifiable information obscured – such as a patient’s name, and that they were thinking of using a technique known as “hashing” to match an individual’s medical data to their social media information. 

Facebook said on Wednesday that as many as 87 million users were affected by the Cambridge Analytica scandal, and that “most” of their 2.2 billion users were exposed to potential data scraping by “malicious actors.” 

Building 8

The project to share medical-related data was led by Freddy Abnousi, an interventional cardiologist whose role is described on LinkedIn as “leading top-secret projects.” The program operated out of Facebook’s “Building 8,” an experimental projects group headed by Regina Dugan prior to her October 2017 departure. 

The collaboration between Facebook and Hospitals would figure out if a user’s combined information could improve patient care – for example, if an elderly patient doesn’t have nearby close friends or much community support, the Facebook program might decide to send a nurse over to check in after a medical procedure. 

Of course, no word on whether this data would be then sold – perhaps to insurance companies, or whether Facebook would use patient data to better “microtarget” patients with relevant advertisements for pharmaceuticals used to treat various conditions. 

Cathleen Gates, interim CEO of the American College of Cardiology, explained the benefits of the plan in a quote provided by Facebook: 

“For the first time in history, people are sharing information about themselves online in ways that may help determine how to improve their health. As part of its mission to transform cardiovascular care and improve heart health, the American College of Cardiology has been engaged in discussions with Facebook around the use of anonymized Facebook data, coupled with anonymized ACC data, to further scientific research on the ways social media can aid in the prevention and treatment of heart disease—the #1 cause of death in the world. This partnership is in the very early phases as we work on both sides to ensure privacy, transparency and scientific rigor. No data has been shared between any parties.”

Due to state and federal patient privacy laws such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), health systems are notoriously cautious about sharing patient health information. 

The “hashing” technique Facebook reportedly proposed is a common cryptographic technique which could be used to match patient data to social media information – allowing the program to operate while obscuring personally identifiable information. 

That said, the issue of patient consent didn’t come up in any of the early discussions of the program, reports an individual familiar with the program via CNBC – and Facebook has notoriously done research on users without their permission.

Notably, in 2014, Facebook manipulated hundreds of thousands of people’s news feeds to study whether certain types of content made people happier or sadder. Facebook later apologized for the study.

Health policy experts say that this health initiative would be problematic if Facebook did not think through the privacy implications. –CNBC

“Consumers wouldn’t have assumed their data would be used in this way,” said Aneesh Chopra, president of a health software company specializing in patient data called CareJourney and the former White House chief technology officer.

“If Facebook moves ahead (with its plans), I would be wary of efforts that repurpose user data without explicit consent.”

Facebook told CNBC the following about the program:

“The medical industry has long understood that there are general health benefits to having a close-knit circle of family and friends. But deeper research into this link is needed to help medical professionals develop specific treatment and intervention plans that take social connection into account.”

“With this in mind, last year Facebook began discussions with leading medical institutions, including the American College of Cardiology and the Stanford University School of Medicine, to explore whether scientific research using anonymized Facebook data could help the medical community advance our understanding in this area. This work has not progressed past the planning phase, and we have not received, shared, or analyzed anyone’s data.”

Last month we decided that we should pause these discussions so we can focus on other important work, including doing a better job of protecting people’s data and being clearer with them about how that data is used in our products and services.

No word on whether Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital has been involved in the program following the Facebook CEO’s $75 million donation.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2EnAeOm Tyler Durden

Did Trump Just Leak Friday’s “Fantastic” Job Data?

President Donald Trump traveled to West Virginia on Thursday for a tax round table in Greenbrier county where the president attacked Democratic incumbents, spoke about the number of illegal immigrants voting during the 2016 election and revealed that the military would build “some” of Trump’s planned border wall.

But the surprise was that in the wake of today’s unexpectedly soft weekly jobless claims number, which printed at 242K on expectations of a 225K print, Trump took a few moments to talk up tomorrow’s jobs report, telling the crowd “we’re gonna come out with numbers on Friday that are hopefully gonna be fantastic numbers.”

Of course, Trump has a long history of talking (and tweeting) about economic data that much of the public was probably ignorant of before he took office. And considering that the market has endured some turbulence this week as tit-for-tat trade tensions between China and the US continued to percolate, it’s not surprising that he’d want to try and reassure them.

However, somebody should probably tell the president that a strong jobs number and higher-than-expected wage inflation is precisely what the markets don’t want: after all, we saw what happened when we got such a combo back in February, which supplanted the “goldilocks” paradigm, unleashing a historic VIX surge and market plunge. Bottom line: if Trump really wants stocks higher, he wants the most unfantasticnumber possible as that would suggest the Fed might delay the pace of interest-rate hikes.

Unless, of course, Trump already knew what the payrolls number is and was so excited to leak it, that this was the outcome.

Trump then quickly moved on to other topics. At one point, the president held up what he said was a copy of his prepared remarks, and threw it away, pronouncing it “boring. “

“This was gonna be my remarks. It would have taken about 2 minutes,” he said, before tossing the paper in the air. That would have been a little boring. Little boring,” he said. “I am reading off the first paragraph and, I said, ‘This is boring.'”

Then as he often does during his regional visits, Trump dedicated some time to attacking Manchin, who Trump said “votes against everything,” including “our tax cuts.” 

Trump also said that the military might be involved in building the wall during an extended riff about immigration.

“We have to have strong borders,” the President said. “We are going to have the wall. We’ve already started building it. We have a billion six. We are building it and fixing miles and miles of wall that’s already up and fence. We’re going to have our wall, we’re going to get it very strongly, the military is going to be building some of it, but we’re going to have very strong borders and we have to change our laws and we’re working on doing that.”

He later reiterated his claim that “millions and millions” of people illegally voted during the 2016 race.

“In many places the same person in California votes many times,” said Trump, at the official White House event in West Virginia on tax cuts. “They always like to say, ‘Oh that’s a conspiracy theory.’ It’s not a conspiracy theory. Millions and millions of people and it’s very hard because the state guards their records.”

In keeping with the theme of the event, Trump tweeted that his tax cut plan had helped make America “open for business.”

Circling back to the jobs report, expect a congratulatory tweet from the president if the data comes in strong, as most expect, especially after the blowout ADP. And if the data is weak, well we are confident Trump will find something else with which to distract.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2IuG2YQ Tyler Durden

What’ll Be Zuckerberg’s Most Problematic Question From The Senate Hearings

Submitted by Mark St. Cyr

As has been reported Mark Zuckerberg will appear in front of a joint Senate panel on Tuesday of next week. The ratings for this live show may be one for the records when it comes to Gov-TV. Everyone, and I do mean just that – everyone – wants to know what they’ve been exposed to, or relieved of, when it comes to their data via Facebook et al. The stakes could not be higher for both Mark Zuckerberg and his company, but also the entire tech apparatus as it is currently known today. It will be one for the history books, that’s for sure.

So, with that said, I would like to offer up for your listening attention what I feel will be the, and by that I mean just that – the – question and responses to be on high alert for, because this is where you’ll understand just how far Mr. Zuckerberg has fallen in the eyes of his once coveted cohorts. i.e., The politicians and/or party he used to view as allies. For if this line of questioning emanates from those he (and also Ms. “Lean In” who has suddenly leaned out from all public view) once seemingly allowed full access to scrape and use whatever they wanted to their heart’s content? 

This is when he himself will find the true meaning of: It’s different this time.

Here’s the question…

Committee Member: “Mr Zuckerberg, why is it that suddenly you found the need only months before some of these revelations first began became public to not only increase your stated goal of selling your shares, but as these revelations have increased in both size and scale, so too has your selling of your shares? So much so, that over the last few months you have sold more shares (some may use the term dumped) than anyone else, at any company, in all of Wall Street!”

The response will not matter, although I’m quite secure in the feeling it’ll be another rendition, or that days version of “Oh gee golly whiz,…”

Again, all that is needed to tell you where everything is going from there will be once that question, or something very similar is put forth. For if it is (as I fully believe it will) everyone along with Mr. Zuckerberg will no doubt know – in that moment – not only are things different this time, but rather, it’s officially over and not coming back.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2q8JQYk Tyler Durden

The world’s most powerful banker sees chance of “market panic”

The most powerful banker in the world, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, just released his annual letter to shareholders.

Behind Warren Buffett’s annual missive, Dimon’s letter is probably the most read and deliberated executive report out there.

For one, Dimon is one of the most connected and respected men in finance.

And given his bank’s massive size (it earned $24.4 billion on $103.6 billion in revenue last year) and reach (it’s a giant in consumer/commercial banking, investment banking and wealth management), Dimon has incredible visibility and intel on what’s going on around the world.

This year Dimon used a large chunk of his 46-page letter to share his thoughts on government and public policy, saying it’s hard to look at the last 20 years in America “and not think that it has been getting increasingly worse.”

And if you’d like to hear how Dimon suggests we fix regulation, immigration, taxation, infrastructure, education and every other problem in America today, it’s all in there.

I’m not really interested in his political views. Dimon runs one of the biggest banks in the world, so I’m much more interested in his insights into the economy and financial markets.

Fortunately, Dimon didn’t waste all of his letter on politics.

He says the US economy seems healthy today and he’s bullish for the “next year or so.”

He sees lower unemployment, higher capital spending, wage growth, low housing supply and “relatively strong” consumer and corporate credit aiding growth.

Well, it’s easy to have rose-colored lenses when your profits come from lending money… because there’s more debt in the world today than ever before.

Both corporations and consumers are sitting on a record amount of debt. And as I pointed out earlier this week, the fastest growing bank asset last year was subprime loans… meaning that the -quality- of debt is getting worse and worse.

Then there’s the US government, whose debts just passed $21 trillion for the first time in history.

And they’re projecting adding another trillion dollars of debt each year into the foreseeable future.

Later in his letter, Dimon admits that the US is facing some serious economic headwinds today.

For one, he’s concerned the unwinding of quantitative easing (QE) could have unintended consequences.

Remember- QE is just a fancy name for the trillions of dollars that the Federal Reserve conjured out of thin air.

According to Dimon [my emphasis added]:

Since QE has never been done on this scale and we don’t completely know the myriad effects it has had on asset prices, confidence, capital expenditures and other factors, we cannot possibly know all of the effects of its reversal.

We have to deal with the possibility that at one point, the Federal Reserve and other central banks may have to take more drastic action than they currently anticipate – reacting to the markets, not guiding the markets.

To that point, the Dow dropped over 700 points intraday. Then it dropped over 500 points on Wednesday, before ending the day slightly higher.

But this extreme volatility does suggest the bull market is nearing its end… if it hasn’t ended already.

And if we see the bottom fall out in stocks, you can be sure the Fed will change course, as Dimon suggests.

While nobody has a crystal ball when it comes to the markets, Dimon seems pretty sure we’re in for more volatility and higher interest rates. Again, given his position, he knows what he’s talking about.

One scenario that would require higher rates from the Fed is higher inflation:

If growth in America is accelerating, which it seems to be, and any remaining slack in the labor markets is disappearing – and wages start going up, as do commodity prices – then it is not an unreasonable possibility that inflation could go higher than people might expect.

As a result, the Federal Reserve will also need to raise rates faster and higher than people might expect. In this case, markets will get more volatile as all asset prices adjust to a new and maybe not-so-positive environment.

Now– here’s the important part. For the past ten years, the largest buyer of US government debt was the Federal Reserve.

But now that QE has ended, the US government just lost its biggest lender.

Dimon thinks other major buyers, including foreign central banks, the Chinese, etc. could also reduce their purchases of US government debt.

That, coupled with the US government’s ongoing trade deficits (which will be funded by issuing debt), could also lead to higher rates…

So we could be going into a situation where the Fed will have to raise rates faster and/ or sell more securities, which certainly could lead to more uncertainty and market volatility. Whether this would lead to a recession or not, we don’t know.

We’ll leave you with one final point from Jamie Dimon. He acknowledges markets have a mind of their own, regardless of what the fundamentals say.

And he sees a real risk “that volatile and declining markets can lead to a market panic.”

The most powerful banker in the world believes we’ll see more volatility and higher interest rates in the future. And he sees a chance of an all-out panic.

Given that scenario, I’m happy to watch this from the sidelines. As we’ve talked about before, this is a really good time to think about increasing your cash position.

Source

from Sovereign Man https://ift.tt/2HcDvmN
via IFTTT

Rally Runs Out Of Steam As Semis Socked, Resistance Reached

Trade war or no trade war?

That is the only question algos have to answer daily, and today they decided to pick the latter, as the S&P 500 rose for a third day after even more damage control emerged from Trump’s top two trade and econ advisors.

First, Trump’s trade chief Peter Navarro said on CNBC said there’s still time to hash out a deal with Beijing while Larry Kudlow repeated that the US will get a trade deal with China “over a period of time” as the latest measures are “just proposals right now.”

And even though in early trading it appeared that the Dow Jones would have another 700 points ascent having continued yesterday’s trajectory, just around noon, the DJIA hit a key resistance line, which capped out today’s gains to just over 300 points.

 

The Nasdaq found a similar resistance at the 100DMA level.

The most shorted stocks, which ripped higher in early trading, rolled over shortly around lunch.

 

And not even the continued pressure on the VIX – which tried to break below 19 but failed – helped the bullish case.

It wasn’t just technicals, however, as the Philly Semiconductor Index was socked early on and slid all day starting at the open…

… as a result of a bearish note by the UBS analyst covering the sector, who initiated Micron at a “Sell” with a $35 price target. While normally markets don’t care about sellside research, this time the memory chipmaker – which has seen many hedge funds load up its stock in recent months – tumbled as much as 4%, dragging the entire semi space lower.

At the same time, that other tech darling, Nvidia, sank after a Citron tweet reiterated its bearish case on the company, and said Citron was pressing its short and that even without needing “to write pages”, the short interest is half of where it was a year ago, suggesting most of the shorts had covered:

Citron pressing $NVDA short expect sub $200 soon.  Mkt starting to realize that ML/DL is narrowing and hyper-scale core customers experimenting with diff prop hardware solutions, Ether spreads are dead, Auto- unknown. No need to write pages. Price action.Short Int 1/2 of a yr ago

The result was instant:

Meanwhile, after several days of downside, European equities finally caught up to the American rebound, with the Stoxx 600 surging the most since June 2016 as every sector rallied.

Elsewhere, the dollar rose all day with the BBDXY rising to 1130, while the 10-year Treasury yield popped to just shy of 2.84%, and is now up 10bps in the past 3 days.

And with all bets now off, we look forward to the next biggest macro catalyst, tomorrow’s payrolls report, where if wage inflation comes in hotter than expected, prepare for another very volatile day.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2GXQRW4 Tyler Durden

BofA’s Striking Admission: Markets Will Soon Begin To Panic About Debt Sustainabily

In the latest BofA survey of European fixed income investors (both IG and high yiled), the bank’s credit analyst Barnaby Martin writes that “after fretting about inflation at the start of the year, April’s credit survey shows that the biggest concern has reverted back to “Quantitative Failure”, driven by the recent data slowdown.”

Indeed, as the chart below shows, whereas the evolution of “biggest risks” for Euro investors indicated that strong growth at the start of the year provoked worries over rising inflation, “the recent data moderation has meant that these concerns have quickly given way to worries about a lack of inflation – and thus “Quantitative Failure”.”  And yes, it took just three months for the market to make a 180 and worry not about inflation, but deflation, and a Fed that may be pursuing too many rate hikes into 2018. As Martin notes, “the speed at which inflation concerns have flipped highlights the slim margin of error for a “goldilocks” economic backdrop in ’18.”

In retrospect, however, the sudden reversal is probably not that much of a surprise: as we showed this morning, according to the Citi G-10 Eco Surprise index, after hitting the highest level since the financial crisis, economic surprises promptly tumbled into the red just three months later, confirming how tenuous and fleeting the so-called “global coordinated economic recovery” had been all along.
 

And yet this sudden reversal puts the Fed and central banks in a major quandary. Recall that in a world with over $200 trillion in debt, amounting to well over 300% of Global GDP, the only saving grace is for the debt to get inflated as the alternative is default, either sovereign or private.

But what if inflation does not come? That is the question Martin asks, and provides the following answer: inflation is a must – the world has never had more debt.”

Investors worry about a potentially toxic combination of low European inflation at year-end just as the ECB – for political reasons – has to stop adding assets. This is the narrative of “Quantitative Failure”. As Chart 2 shows, the world has never had more debt. In fact, since the Global Financial Crisis, global debt has increased close to $50tr (~40%). Monetary largesse in the aftermath of the crisis was used to kick-start the economy, yet it has also simply added to the world’s debt pile. And how does one solve a problem of too much debt when bond restructurings and haircuts are no longer palatable? Inflation.

Which is why “without convincing signs of [inflation] soon, the risk becomes that markets pivot to feeling uneasy about the world’s debt sustainability.”

Indeed Barnaby, although Goldman is one step ahead of you there. Recall that back in February Goldman’s economists observed that “the US appears to be headed into uncharted territory—at least for US fiscal policy—regarding the relationship between interest expense and the debt level.”

As shown in Exhibit 11, interest expense considerably exceeded the current level during the late 1980s and early 1990s, though the debt level was moderate. By contrast, the debt level was slightly higher during and just after World War II than it is today, while the level of interest expense was similar. However, we project that, if Congress continues to extend existing policies, including the recently enacted tax and spending legislation, federal debt will slightly exceed 100% of GDP and interest expense will rise to around 3.5% of GDP, putting the US in a worse fiscal position than the experience of the 1940s or 1990s.

Uncharted territory… or as we put it, “banana republic” status:

But Goldman’s most startling admission, by far, is the following: “the continued growth of public debt raises eventual sustainability questions if left unchecked.”

The irony, of course, is that while one Goldman employee warned that the US is now on collision course with debt sustainability, it was another former Goldman employee – former COO Gary Cohn – who transformed this blueprint for catastrophe into reality.

Needless to say, the culmination and outcome of these processes is a fiscal – and sovereign debt – crisis… unless the Fed proceeds to monetize the deficit once again as it did in 2009-2015, sending yields plunging as the next and final episode of QE is unveiled.

Incidentally, the coming debt crisis is also why Cohn – the mastermind who greenlighted it – couldn’t wait to get the hell out of Dodge.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2GCgMDF Tyler Durden

Southern California Rattled By Magnitude 5.3 Earthquake

A magnitude 5.3 Earthquake just rattled Southern California and was felt in Los Angeles, according to the US Geological Survey.

The quake was centered off California’s coast near Oxnard. There is no tsunami threat at this time.

 

 

No injuries or damage have been reported.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2qangi5 Tyler Durden

“I Just Discovered I Owe The IRS $50,000 I Don’t Have, Because I Traded Cryptos”

A Reddit user who was “surprised” to learn he owed the IRS roughly $50,000 from his crypto-trading profits – money that he had not set aside when he cashed out his bitcoins at the height of the boom – complained in a viral post that crypto trading “ruined his life.”

The alleged trader, who uses the screenname Thoway, explained that he bought eight bitcoins for $7,200 in January 2017 then cashed them out in December for about $120,000. Here’s the catch: his altcoin investments quickly sunk, eating away most of his bitcoin profits. But unbeknownst to him, by selling his bitcoin, Thoway had inadvertently triggered a “taxable event”.

IRS

Thoway said his lawyer advised him to cash out his remaining altcoins and give whatever is left to the IRS. Thoway, who has not been identified and has apparently gone “missing” from Reddit since his post went viral, told readers that he earns $47,000 a year as an office assistant.

Thoway’s lawyer said he should be able to set up a payment plan allowing him to pay down the debt over a long-period of time, likely ten years. Still, Thoway complains that, during that period, his tax payments will likely siphon off most of what would’ve been his savings, meaning he has essentially been condemned to live paycheck to paycheck for the foreseeable future because he made a profitable trade, but ignored the tax consequences.

“I feel like I might have accidentally ruined my life because I didn’t know about the taxes,” he said.

While the original post was removed by Reddit for several violations in the comments thread, it’s extremely likely that the anonymous Reddit user isn’t alone in his predicament.

Reddit

Meanwhile, the April 15 tax deadline appears to be having a far greater impact on the crypto space.

According to Fundstart’s Tom Lee, who anticipated the parabolic runup in crypto prices late last year (and still sees Bitcoin rising to an all time high in 2018) said the April 15 income-tax filing deadline could be contributing to the recent market rout in cryptos. Bitcoin has fallen more than 40% during the past month, and suffered its worst quarter in history. 

BTC

According to Lee, similar to Thoway, investors are cashing out to pay their tax bills. According to his calculations, first reported by Bloomberg, every dollar withdrawn from crypto wipes between $20 to $25 from total crypto market value.

More amazing is Lee estimate how much Americans owe the IRS due to the recent Bitcoin price surge: he said that US households had $92 billion in taxable gains from cryptocurrencies in 2017 – roughly 20% of capital-gains tax receipts to the US Treasury.

Which means that the value of crypto-related taxes should be around $25 billion.

Lee, who is hanging on to his bold price target for bitcoin to hit $25,000 by year’s end, believes the selling pressure will soon pass.

“We still like Bitcoin and large-caps,” he said, adding that “while we believe the bear market for alt coins is largely over, we do not see upside for alts until mid-August.”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2GC60gN Tyler Durden

Stock Uptrends Bend But Don’t Break (Yet)

Via Dana Lyons’ Tumblr,

After a choppy week, key bull market trendlines are still being tested in many stock indices.

A week ago, we dedicated a blog post to the trendline developments that we posted in our weekly #TrendlineWednesday feature on Twitter. The reason for the unusual post was because of the prolific number of key trendlines being tested at the time in a wide array of indices and stocks. Well, after a volatile week that basically saw the market make little headway, up or down, there has been scant resolution among these trendline tests. Therefore, our #TrendlineWednesday feature is just as prolific as last week’s.

Here are this week’s relevant trendlines that we highlighted (among many other worthy candidates):

 

 

Will these trendlines continue to hold? Only time will tell. In our experience, the more times a trendline is tested, and the more frequently it is tested, the more likely it is to break. However, the proof is in the prices and until proven otherwise, it’s all bend but no break at this point.

*  *  *

If you’re interested in the “all-access” version of our charts and research, please check out our new site, The Lyons Share. You can follow our investment process and posture every day — including insights into what we’re looking to buy and sell and when. Thanks for reading!

via RSS https://ift.tt/2q7G0PS Tyler Durden