Why Trump Is Routing The ‘Free Traders’

Submitted by Patrick Buchanan via Buchanan.org,

In Tuesday’s indictment of free trade as virtual economic treason, The Donald has really set the cat down among the pigeons.

For, in denouncing NAFTA, the WTO, MFN for China and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, all backed by Bush I and II, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, Trump is all but calling his own party leaders dunderheads and losers.

And he seems to be winning the argument.

As he calls for the repudiation of “globalism” and a return to “Americanism,” a Republican Congress renders itself mute on whether it will even vote on the TPP this year.

On trade, Bernie Sanders is closer to Trump. Even Hillary Clinton has begun to renounce a TPP she once called the “gold standard” of trade deals.

Where have all the troubadours of free trade gone? Why do economic patriots seem ascendant? Is this like the Cold War, where the other side gets up and goes home?

Answer. As Trump pointed out in Monessen in the Mon Valley of Pennsylvania, the returns from free trade are in, and the results are rotten.

Since Bush I, we have run $12 trillion in trade deficits, $4 trillion with China. Once a Maoist dump, China has become the greatest manufacturing power on earth. Meanwhile, the U.S. has lost 50,000 factories and a third of its manufacturing jobs.

Trump is going to start a “trade war,” wail the critics.

But the damage wreaked upon U.S. industry by free traders already rivals what Arthur “Bomber” Harris did for German industry in the Ruhr.

In recent decades, every major U.S. trade partner — China, Japan, Canada, Mexico, EU — has run annual trade surpluses at our expense. How do 40 years of trade deficits in goods, run by a nation that rarely ran one for a century before, make us stronger or wealthier?

Or is what is best for the world now more important than what is best for America?

And here we come to the heart of the argument.

Washington, Hamilton, and Henry Clay, father of the “American System,” and Lincoln and every Republican president up to Eisenhower, crafted trade policies to promote manufacturing to grow the wealth of the USA.

They were patriots not globalists.

They knew that America’s political independence required economic independence of all other nations. They wanted to build an economy where Americans would cut their bonds to foreign lands and come to rely upon one another for the needs and necessities of their national life. They sought to make us independent, so that we could not be dragged by economic ties into the inevitable wars of the Old World.

And they succeeded magnificently.

Britain, which embraced free trade in the 1840s, became so reliant on imports that a few dozen German submarines almost knocked her out of World War I. Protectionist America had to come pull her chestnuts out of the fire.

Free trade ideology is not America-made. It is an alien faith, a cargo cult, smuggled in from the old continent, the work of men Edmund Burke called “sophisters, economists, and calculators.”

David Ricardo, James and John Stuart Mill, Richard Cobden, all chatterers and scribblers, none of whom ever built a great nation, declared free trade to be the new New Testament, the salvation of mankind.

These men in whose souls the old faith was dying seized on a utopian belief that world government and free trade would be the salvation of mankind. The Economist magazine was founded to preach the heresy.

Before the modern era, Americans never bought into it. But now, our elites have. And, undeniably, there are beneficiaries to free trade.

There are first the owners, operators and shareholders of companies who, to be rid of high-wage American labor, moved production to China or Mexico or where the costs are lower and regulations near nonexistent.

Transnational companies, their K Street lobbyists, and media that survive on their advertising dollars, are the biggest boosters of free trade, as they are the biggest beneficiaries.

Consumers, too, at least initially, see more products down at the mall, selling at lower prices. Cheap consumer goods are the bribes free traders proffer to patriots to sell out their country and countrymen to capitalists who have no country.

But we are not simply consumers. We are Americans. We are fellow citizens. We are neighbors. We have duties to one another.

When a factory shuts down and a town begins to die, workers are laid off. The local tax base shrinks, education and social services are cut. Folks go on unemployment and food stamps. We all pay for that.

Wives go to work and kids come home from school to empty houses, and families break up, and move away. Social disintegration follows.

“Creative destruction” is the antiseptic term free traders use to describe what they have done and are doing to the America we grew up in.

Southeast of the old Steel City, in the Mon Valley of Pennsylvania, where my mother and her six brothers and her sister grew up, folks describe what happened more poignantly and graphically.

via http://ift.tt/29yTaMb Tyler Durden

Video of the Day – CNN Anchor Embarrasses Herself in Interview with the UK’s Daniel Hannan

Screen Shot 2016-07-01 at 1.48.32 PM

“I was bribed by billionaires, I was bribed by the Americans to report…not exactly the truth.”

–  From the post: “Non-Official Cover” – Respected German Journalist Blows Whistle on How the CIA Controls the Media

If you want a perfect example of why everyone hates the media so much, take a look at this interview, I mean interrogation, of British MEP Daniel Hannan by CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour.

Her bias is so unbelievably transparent, it’s embarrassing.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/299q31x
via IFTTT

ISIS Mastermind Behind Istanbul Terrorist Attack Was A “Refugee” Protected By Europe

Following Tuesday’s horrific attack at Istanbul’s Ataturk airport which resulted in 44 death at the hands of 3 suicide bombers, Turkey was quick to blame the Islamic State for the terrorist act. And while that may be accurate, something surprising has emerged about the alleged ringleader of the group of three men who have been since identified as Russian, Uzbek and Kyrgyz nationals. As Russia’s Kommersant and Turkish media report, a Chechen national suspected of being the mastermind behind the deadly Istanbul airport terrorist attack, had previously received refugee status in Austria, which helped him to repeatedly avoid extradition to Russia on terror charges.

Ahmed Chataev

As the complete picture of the latest terrorist attack in Turkey comes together, it has emerged that the attack was allegedly organized by Ahmed Chataev, a Russian citizen of Chechen origin, who joined the Islamic State in 2015 and now fights in Syria, Turkish media report, citing police sources.

Chataev was assigned a leading role in training extremists that would then commit terrorist attacks in both Russia and Western Europe, the Deputy Chairman of the Russian Investigative Committee Andrey Przhezdomsky said, adding that, in Syria, Chataev also commands a unit consisting “primarily of immigrants from the North Caucasus.”

It has been also revealed that Chataev was long wanted by the Russian authorities for terrorism-related offenses but he fled to Europe, where he was granted asylum, and successfully managed to escape extradition to Russia. The alleged mastermind joined Islamist secessionist militants that fought against Russia in the Second Chechen War between 1999 and 2000, where he lost an arm. Later, he was considered to be a representative of Dokka Umarov, once a “terrorist ?1” in Russia, in the Western Europe.

The attack coordinator was on a wanted list in Russia since 2003 for sponsoring terrorism, recruiting extremists and membership in a terrorist group, Russian media report. However, in the same year, he received asylum in Austria. Chataev reportedly claimed that he lost his arm as he was severely tortured in Russian prison adding that he is being persecuted by Russian authorities.


He lost his arm in Russia in the early 2000s, though there are conflicting reports
as to how he lost the limb

In 2008, he was detained with some other Chechen nationals in the Swedish town of Trelleborg as police found Kalashnikov assault rifles, explosives and ammunition in his car. As a result, he spent more than a year in Swedish prison.

In 2010, Chataev was arrested in Ukraine with his mobile phone files containing a demolition technique instruction and photos of people killed in a blast. Russia requested his extradition on terrorism-related charges but the European Court for Human Rights ordered Ukraine not to hand him over to Russia with Amnesty International also urging Ukrainian authorities to halt extradition as Chataev “could face an unfair trial and would be at risk of torture and other ill-treatment.

Below is the actual statement filed by Amnesty International titled “Ukraine: Chechen risks torture if returned to Russia

Ahmed Chataev, an ethnic Chechen man, is threatened with imminent forcible return from Ukraine to Russia. If he is returned, he could face an unfair trial and would be at risk of torture and other ill-treatment in order to extract “confessions” from him. Ahmed Chataev has been granted refugee status in Austria and was visiting Ukraine with a valid visa. Ukraine is a state party to the Refugee Convention and the UN Convention against Torture, which prohibit the return of anyone to a situation where they would be at risk of torture.

 

One year later, he was again detained as he was crossing the border between Turkey and Bulgaria but he again avoided extradition because of the interference of human rights organizations that stressed Chataev had a refugee status in Austria and thus cannot be sent to Russia, Kommersant reported. Between 2012 and 2015, Chataev reportedly lived in Georgia, where he also joined some terrorist groups and served a prison sentence on terrorism-related charges.

In February 2015, he left Georgia for Syria, where he joined IS militants and soon took a high position in the Islamic State hierarchy.

Finally, in October 2015, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the US Department of the Treasury added Chataev to its terrorist list because of his alleged involvement into recruitment of extremists.

 

And just like that, in the span of 5 years, a person whose extradition to Russia was prevented by Europe and Amnesty ended up a formally recognized terrorist by the US, and ultimately his actions resulted in the death of 44 people. If only there was less political bickering between Russia and Europe, more than 40 innocent lives could have been spared.

Finally, in light of these revelations, one wonders precisely what is the function of the ubiquitous NSA in today’s world?

via http://ift.tt/29yPoT0 Tyler Durden

Who We’ve Slaughtered with Drones Is Your Holiday Weekend News Dump

Predator droneToday President Barack Obama’s administration is publicly releasing some information about the collateral damage caused by using armed drones to try to strike down terrorists in foreign countries. Whether anybody believe the figures being provided is another matter entirely.

Today the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released numbers for what it claims are combatant and non-combatant deaths for drone strikes in countries outside of formal war zones. This means countries like Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia, and Libya, but specifically not Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq.

death count

The federal government says that out of 473 drone strikes in these countries, they’ve killed between 2,372 and 2,581 actual combatants and between 64 and 116 non-combatants. This formal recognition of the number of non-combatants killed is far below what independent observers to be an accurate accounting. The New York Times notes:

In a seeming acknowledgment that the long-anticipated disclosure would be greeted with skepticism by drone critics, the administration released the numbers on a Friday afternoon before a holiday weekend. The use of a range of estimated civilian deaths underscored the fact that the government often does not know for sure the affiliations of those killed.

“They’re guessing, too,” said Bill Roggio, editor of the Long War Journal at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, who has tracked civilian deaths for more than a decade. “Theirs may be a little more educated than my guesses. But they cannot be completely accurate.”

Outsiders (depending on the group) estimate between 200 and 1,000 non-combatants have been killed by drone strikes outside of war zones.

The ODNI report predicts this criticism and says it believes its numbers are more accurate because it has better information: “The U.S. Government draws on all available information (including sensitive intelligence) to determine whether an individual is part of a belligerent party fighting against the United States in an armed conflict; taking a direct part in hostilities against the United States; or otherwise targetable in the exercise of national self-defense. Thus, the U.S. Government may have reliable information that certain individuals are combatants, but are being counted as non-combatants by nongovernmental organizations.”

Critics of America’s use of drones, though, say the government actually operates almost the opposite of what it just described. In The Assassination Complex, by Jeremy Scahill and the staff of The Intercept, sources tell them that the government frequently assumes that those it kills are enemy combatants unless it gathers evidence that says otherwise.

Regardless of how trustworthy the numbers are, it’s still a formal acknowledgment that the American government is killing innocent people in countries in which we do not have an active war. The larger question, though, is whether the American public actually cares. A Pew poll from 2015 shows that a majority of Americans—58 percent—support using drone strikes to target extremists. Republicans, Democrats, and independents alike all support using them in majority numbers, though in lower numbers among the Democrats and independents.

Read the ODNI report here.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/29yNkKV
via IFTTT

The subprime bubble grew by $1.4 trillion in just one month [video]

[Editor’s note: You can watch Simon’s video podcast of today’s notes by clicking here.]

In the late 12th century while the rest of Europe was choking on feudalism, Venice was rapidly becoming the most advanced power on the continent.

At that point Venice had already created a free society where anyone, regardless of origin or class, could work hard and prosper. It was truly the America of its day.

The Venetians were very forward thinkers. They established a very crude type of limited partnership called a commenda that formed the basis for the modern corporation.

And starting in the late 1100s, the Venetian government began issuing a unique type of sovereign debt called prestiti.

Prestiti were among the earliest form of institutionalized government bonds.

And in their incredible book A History of Interest Rates, authors Sydney Homer and Richard Sylla show these Venetian government bond yields ranged between 5% and 22% for several centuries.

This set the standard for government bonds for the next eight centuries

When the first Dutch bonds were issued in 1517, almost 500 years ago, yields were roughly 20%.

And over the last several centuries, government bond yields around the world typically stayed in a range between 5% and 15%.

That’s the real long-term average… the range that you could consider ‘normal’ for government bonds.

Yet today’s government bond yields are near zero. And in many respects, less than zero.

This essentially means that investors who buy these government bonds are absolutely guaranteed to lose money if they hold to maturity.

This is absolutely insane. If you’re guaranteed to lose money, a bond is no longer a safe haven. It’s not even an investment anymore. It’s just pure insanity.

Barely a month ago I told you how the total size of all the government bonds around the world with negative yields had reached an astounding $10.4 trillion.

That’s an enormous figure. But what was really alarming was how fast the number is growing.

In February 2015, less than 18-months ago, there were $3.6 trillion worth of government bonds around the world that had negative yields.

A year later in February 2016, it had grown to $7 trillion.

By May, $9.9 trillion. Last month, $10.4 trillion.

But just in the last 30 days, the worldwide total of government bonds with negative yields grew $1.4 trillion in just one month to $11.7 trillion.

That’s astonishing. $11.7 trillion is larger than the GDP of China!

We’ve seen this movie before. It was only eight years ago that the financial system was engaged in the same kind of insanity.

Banks had spent years making massive home loans at ultra-cheap interest rates to borrowers with pitiful credit, in many cases with absolutely no money down.

Unsurprisingly, the old adage eventually came true: if you owe the bank $100,000 can can’t pay, you have a problem. If a million people owe the banks $100,000 and can’t pay, the banks have a problem.

Well, the subprime borrowers couldn’t pay, and the banks ended up with a huge problem.

The subprime housing bubble, in fact, almost caused an all-out collapse of the financial system.

Now here’s the important part: back then, the total size of the subprime bubble was ‘only’ $1.3 trillion.

Today’s negative interest rate bubble is NINE times the size of the 2008 subprime crisis.

Now, I don’t see a whole lot of difference between 2008’s subprime home loan borrowers, versus 2016’s subprime government borrowers.

Neither borrower has the financial means to repay its debts.

Back in 2008 the banks loaned money to subprime borrowers under the false premise that ‘home prices always go up.’

Today investors buy the bonds of subprime governments based on the false premise that ‘governments always pay their debts.’

Both assumptions are completely absurd and defy even the most cursory lessons of financial history.

History, in fact, teach us that anytime financial markets engage in such reckless, irresponsible behavior, a crisis almost invariably ensues.

Ask yourself a question: does it really make sense that woefully bankrupt countries (like Japan, with its national debt exceeding 1 QUADRILLION yen) are able to borrow money and issue bonds with negative yields?

Do we really expect that this subprime government bond bubble, whose rate of expansion is accelerating, can continue to get bigger and bigger without consequence forever?

Would you take your hard-earned savings and buy some bankrupt government bond where you’re guaranteed to lose money?

If not, then ask yourself one more question:

Whose money do you think the banks are using to buy these bonds?

Why, yours, of course.

Banks don’t use their own money to buy government bonds. They use your money.

So if you’re thinking, ‘big deal, I don’t own any of these government bonds,’ guess again. If you have money tied up in the banking system, you’re exposed.

The entire financial system is exposed, just like the entire financial system was exposed to the 2008 subprime crisis.

Look, no one has a crystal ball. This bubble could continue to expand for weeks, months, or even years.

But in the face of such complete insanity, it certainly makes sense to take some basic precautions to limit the impact on your own life.

Whenever you get in your vehicle, you know there’s a bunch of crazies out on the open road.

That’s no reason to panic or live your life in fear. Instead, we take some very basic precautions. We put on a seatbelt.

It’s pretty clear there’s a bunch of crazies in the financial system as well. So put on your seatbelt.

Consider, for example, holding some physical cash instead of keeping 100% of your funds in the banking system.

Own some real assets like gold and silver.

There are plenty of options available to reduce this risk. Just don’t ignore this bubble… because the bigger it becomes, the more severe the consequences when it bursts.

from Sovereign Man http://ift.tt/29hJCsx
via IFTTT

Price Discovery – R.I.P.!

Submitted by David Stockman via Contra Corner blog,

That was quick. With practically of the Brexit loss recovered in four days and the market now up for the quarter and the year, what’s not to like?

After all, the central banks are purportedly at the ready, and, in the case of the ECB and BOE, are already swinging into action according to their shills in the MSM. MarketWatch thus noted,

Markets were boosted by reports indicating the European Central Bank is weighing changes to its bond-buying program, while “the Bank of England also said they are all in,” said Joe Saluzzi, co-head of equity trading at Themis Trading.

The European Central Bank is considering changing the rules regarding the types of bonds it can buy as part of its stimulus package to amid concerns it could run out of securities to buy under current stipulations, according to Bloomberg News. The report followed comments from Bank of England Gov. Mark Carney, who indicated the central bank is poised to further ease monetary policy to combat

Well now, by the sound of it you would think that the madman Draghi is fixing to uncork the mother of all QEs if there is a danger that the ECB will “run out of securities to buy”.

Who would have thought that the debt engorged governments of the eurozone couldn’t manufacture enough IOUs to satisfy Mario’s “buy” button? In fact, with public debt at 91% of GDP you would think that the $12.5 trillion outstanding would be more than enough to go around.

Euro Area Government Debt to GDP

It turns out, however, that the operative phrase is “under current stipulations”. In a fit of apparent prudence, the ECB determined that in buying $90 billion of government bonds and other securities per month, it would only purchase securities with a yield higher than its negative 0.4% deposit rate.

That’s right. Stumbling around in their monetary puzzle palace, the geniuses at the ECB determined that subzero rates are just fine with one condition. Namely, so long as they don’t have to pay more to own German bonds, for example, than German banks are paying to deposit excess funds at the ECB.

Stated differently, the ECB apparently determined it will not go broke in subzero land even if it is driving insurance companies, pension funds, banks and plain old savers in exactly that direction.

But then comes the catch-22. The more bonds Draghi promises to buy, the more the casino front-runners scarf-up those same bonds on 95% repo leverage—-knowing that Mario will gift them with a big fat gain on their tiny sliver of capital at risk.

That drives bond prices ever higher and yields lower, of course. At length, the stampede to buy today what Mario is buying tomorrow has driven yields below the negative 0.4% cutoff point for an increasing share of the German yield curve.

The Brexit event only compounded the absurdity. As shown below, it caused another $1.3 trillion of worldwide sovereign bonds to enter the subzero zone. This brought the global total to $11.7 trillion or 26% of all government debt outstanding on the planet, including more than $1 trillion each of German and French government debt and nearly $8 trillion of Japanese government debt.

Especially notable in the above chart is the swelling amount of longer-term debt now trading at negative yields. This means that the ECB’s insensible “scarcity” problem just got worse.

In part, that’s because the ECB’s money printing rules require its bond purchases to be allocated on roughly a pro rata basis among its member countries.

So the punters who piled into bunds in response to the Brexit event, drove even more of the German yield curve below the ECB’s negative 0.4% cut-off points. There is now a “no buy zone” out to 8-years on the German government yield curve.

Nor is that the extent of the subzero lunacy. As also indicated in the chart, the Swiss yield curve is negative all the way out to 48 years, where the bond actually traded at -0.0082%, and the JGB 40-year bond yields a scant 6 basis points.

Yes, by 2056 Japan’s retirement colony will be bigger than its labor force, and its fiscal and monetary system will have crashed long before. But no matter. Before it self-destructs, the BOJ will buy all the Japanese government debt, anyway. It already owns 426 trillion yen worth—an amount that equals fully 85% of GDP.

When it comes to government debt, therefore, it can be well and truly said that “price discovery” is dead and gone. Japan is only the leading edge, but the trend is absolutely clear. The price of  sovereign debt is where central banks peg it, not where real money savers and investors will buy it.

Needless to say, this is something new under the sun, and not in a good way. While the casino’s day traders may not have noticed that NIRP has not always been with us, this graph shows how rapidly the contagion is spreading. In less than 2-years, one-quarter of the world’s sovereign debt has slid into the nether region of NIRP.

Paying governments to borrow money makes carrying coals to Newcastle sound like a vast understatement. But in today’s unhinged casinos the gamblers care not a wit.

The culture of stimulus entitlement has become so embedded that the age-old truth that governments are inherently dangerous fiscal miscreants has been completely lost. The only thing the “market” looks at is how soon the next dollop of stimulus will be coming down the pike.

But the destruction of price discovery in the sovereign debt market is not simply an academic curiosity to be jawed about by the few remaining fiscal scolds in the world. To the contrary, it is already having massive toxic consequences in the arenas of fiscal governance and capital markets alike.

As to the former, consider the case of France and its $1 trillion of negatively yielding government debt. That amounts to nearly one-half of its relentlessly rising total, which has grown by nearly 50% just in the last nine years, and now amounts to 85% of GDP.

France General Government Debt

The fact is, France is a socialist basket case in which the state is steadily and surely devouring the entire private economy. The state share is now pushing 57% of GDP, and it has not stopped climbing toward the upper right of the graph for nearly four decades.

Yet France is now being paid to spend and borrow even more, thereby begging a self-evident question. What happens when France’s tax and dirigisme impaired economy sinks into permanent decline (its almost there now) and the ECB is finally forced to shut down its printing press?

Nor is the eventual collapse of France $2.4 trillion sovereign bond bubble necessarily a matter for the distant by-and-by.

The populist candidacy of Marine Le Pen was already well in the lead for France’s 2017 presidential election. Brexit has now given dramatic new impetus and credibility to her anti-EU platform.

Even the possibility of a Frexit win next year would trigger a relentless wave of selling by the Draghi front-runners who were today buying the 10-year bond of this terminal-ill state at a mere 7 basis point yield.

Stated differently, in theory the clueless Draghi is pegging French bond rates in the subzero zone in order to jump start inflation. In practice, he is setting up a monumental FED (financial explosive device) that could erupt at any moment owing to Frexit risk, European recession, a German revolt at the ECB or numerous other potential catalysts.

France Government Spending to GDP

The hair-trigger risk embedded in the financial insanity of sovereign ZIRP was neatly illustrated by Wolf Richter in a recent post on this topic. What he pointed out in the case of the German bund is applicable to the entire $11.7 trillion of subzero debt outstanding.

To wit, the front-runners and bond market speculators are sitting on giant capital gains that were caused by the systematic falsification of bond prices by the central banks. You don’t have to be a bond quant to understand that any serious break in confidence will cause these punters to grab their gains and dump there bonds:

What does this mean for investors that bought bonds with long maturities years ago? For example the German 4.75% Bund, issued in 2008 and due in July 2040 trades at 202.3 cents on the euro, having doubled its value over the past eight years. The sellers of those bonds are the true beneficiaries of Draghi’s monetary policies, and they can sell them right to the ECB.

This observation puts the lie to a related Wall Street delusion. The crowd which insists there is no bond bubble—– notwithstanding that fully $25 trillion of government debt is yielding 1% or less—–says its just Mr. Market discounting a weak, deflationary economy in the period ahead.

No it’s not. It’s the law of supply and demand at work.

Between the $21 trillion of debt already owned by the central banks, and the trillions more held by front-running speculators who expect them to buy more, there is a big fat thumb on the scale; and, as a consequence, there are hideously large and unearned windfalls being captured by these same speculators.

Ironically enough, when the bond bubble eventually blows, ground zero for the meltdown is likely to be among Italy’s $2.4 trillion of outstandings—–some part of which was issued during Mario Draghi’s days at the Italian treasury.

The notion that today’s yield of 1.15% on the Italian 10-year bond even remotely compensates for the risk embedded in Italy’s fiscal and economic chamber of horrors is just plain laughable. And that’s to say nothing of the risk the Brexit is just stage one, and that the EU itself will ultimately succumb to a wave of populist insurgency, including a Five Star led move to take Italy out of the euro.

Indeed, Italy is truly a case of the blind leading the blind. Its giant, bloated banking system is essentially insolvent with nearly $400 billion in NPLs (non-performing loans), but Italy’s languishing economy would be toast if it’s banks are not propped up by the state or an EU bailout.

That’s because the footings of Italy’s banking system exceed $4.4 trillion or more than 2X the size of its GDP. On a comparable scale basis, current US aggregate banking balance sheets of $15 trillion would be upwards of $40 trillion. That is to say, Italy’s massive banking sector suffuses every nook and cranny of its $2 trillion economy.

As shown below, footings have nearly tripled during the past 16 years, even as Italy’s economy remains smaller in real terms than it was in 2007.

And that’s not the half of it. In addition to the massive trove of bad loans to the private sector, embedded in the total footings shown below are nearly $400 billion of Italian government bonds.

Needless to say, these securities are vastly over-valued owing to the Draghi bond-buying spree, and they would plummet in price were the speculators who have been front-running Draghi’s QE campaign ever to loose confidence in the ECB or the ability and willingness of an Italian government to continue the giant fiscal charade now in place.

Italy Banks Balance Sheet

As it happens, that existential challenge is materializing right now. Italy’s major banks are bleeding losses, and have been subject to a massive sell-off in the stock market. Share prices are down 50% to 75% since the beginning of the year alone.

So the Renzi government has been desperately attempting to organize a bailout, but has run smack into the kind of catch-22 that’s buried everywhere in the jerry-built EU bailout regime. To wit, under the new EU banking rules which became effective in 2016, Italy cannot inject government funds into its banking system until it has first forced a trauma-inducing “bail-in” at any bank getting aid.

That not only would mean massive losses for depositors and bank debt-holders, but also the instant collapse of the Renzi government. Italy’s third largest and most insolvent bank, in fact, is virtually an auxiliary of his social democratic party.

Accordingly, Renzi attempted to get a waiver of the new rules on the grounds that the Italian banking crisis has been dramatically intensified by the Brexit shock. But Merkel shot that down at yesterday’s EU leaders meeting faster than it could be translated into German for a powerfully self-evident reason. Namely, that the new bail-in rules are designed to prevent new fiscal crisis in member states and the need for more German funded bailouts.

Now Italy faces the real possibility of a depositor run on its banks, and a  devastating liquidity crisis in its $4.4 trillion banking sector. Accordingly, it has apparently been authorized by the EU to establish a back-up liquidity line of up to $150 billion, but under EU rules it can only be used for solvent banks——of which Italy doesn’t have many.

Needless to say, that won’t solve the problem, but could force the kind of showdown with Brussels and Berlin that is the very reason why the EU’s days are numbered. As Zero Hedge observed,

Brexit will be just the scapegoat used by Renzi and Italy to circumvent any specific eurozone prohibitions. And if it fails, all Renzi has to do is hint at a referendum of his own. Then watch as Merkel scrambles to allow Italy to do whatever it wants, just to avoid the humiliation of a potential “Italeave.”

In short, either the EU opens up the floodgates to a renewed round of bailouts, which would likely result in the collapse of Merkel’s government, or it authorizes Italy to spend upwards of $50 billion to recapitalize its banks and keep the $400 billion of government debt they hold safely in their vaults.

Then again, with public debt already at 133% of GDP, why would anyone except Mario Draghi’s printing press be buying 10-year bonds at a 1.15% yield?

Once upon a time, price discovery by the bond vigilantes kept governments quasi-sober and functionally solvent. No more.

The Italian Job now underway is just the opening round in a world of failed states and broken markets.

Italy Government Debt to GDP

Needless to say, the vast falsification of sovereign debt prices has not happened in a vacuum. It has caused a massive scramble for yield among bond managers and homegamers alike, which, in turn, has distorted and deformed the corporate debt markets like never before.

The $400 billion or high yield bonds and loans now being gutted and liquidated in the shale patch are but one example. The record level of money flows into newly minted subprime auto lenders and CLO funds are another.

In the US alone, corporate bonds outstanding have risen from $3 trillion on the eve of the financial crisis to upwards of $7 trillion today. Overwhelmingly, that massive gain in outstandings have been cycled back into the casino to fund financial engineering schemes, most especially share buybacks.

In a word, without honest price discovery the debt markets of the world have been transformed into a massive doomsday machine. They are paying governments to bankrupt themselves in the subzero zone, while incentivizing the C-suite to strip-mine their balance sheets in order to goose their stock prices today, even as they fatally impair their capacity to compete and grow in the future.

As we said – price discovery, R.I. P.

 

via http://ift.tt/29hHGAb Tyler Durden

Hollywood Insiders Meet to Talk About Gun Violence Prevention, Influence of NRA

Everytown, a political anti-gun group, participated in a summit of Hollywood creatives on the lot of Fox studios, led by Modern Family co-creator and showrunner Steve Levitan, on the topic of “gun violence prevention,” as reported by The Hollywood Reporter. Also in attendance were Fox TV CEO Gary Newman and 20th Century Fox TV creative affairs president Jonathan Davis.

Levitan, who said he’s lost “a couple of friends” to gun violence, bemoaned the influence of the National Rifle Association while speaking to a room full of people that control much of what appears on network television today. I just have always felt that for a lobbying group like the NRA to have this much influence over our lawmakers is an indication that something is wrong,” Levitan said.

Levitan declared that the vacancy on the Supreme Court created by Antonin Scalia and “the likelihood of a Clinton presidency” meant there was a “real opportunity” for advancement of gun control. Levitan did not address how Clinton and Democrats’ opposition to Citizens United and unfettered political speech applied to the way they could use their roles in Hollywood to advance their preferred political speech.

The meeting, fortunately, was not the start of some kind of ill-advised campaign to purge entertainment of gun violence (the NRA has often argued portrayals of violence in popular culture are responsible for certain crimes). “Could Hollywood be a little more responsible in its portrayal of guns?” Levitan asked. “Probably. But entertainment is entertainment. I understand that and I’m not looking to come down too hard on that.” Levitan should make an effort to understand that gun ownership is a Constitutional right. “A right is a right,” you could say, and Americans shouldn’t look to “come down too hard on that.”

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/29bwSEv
via IFTTT

June 2016 Was 2nd Warmest June in Satellite Record: Global Temperature Trend Update

BestThermometerMeryllDreamstimeAlthough global temperatures fell rapidly from May to June as the El Niño Pacific Ocean warming event fades, June 2016 was nonetheless the second warmest June in the satellite temperature record, according to the press release from the University of Alabama Huntsville. June 2016 trailed June 1998 by 0.23 C, according to Dr. John Christy, director of the Earth System Science Center at UAH. Compared to seasonal norms, however, June 2016 was the 30th warmest month overall since the satellite temperature dataset began in December 1978.

June 2016 also was the second warmest on record in the Northern Hemisphere (0.51 C compared to June 1998 at 0.60 C above seasonal norms), but the eighth warmest June in the Southern Hemisphere and, despite the El Niño remnants, only the sixth warmest June in the tropics. The graphic below compares how temperature trends evolved during the big El Nino back in 1997/1998 and the current one that is now fading. If temperatures continue to decline as steeply, predictions that 2016 will be the warmest year in the satellite record will likely not come true.

UAH1998v2016

Global climate trend since Nov. 16, 1978: +0.12 C per decade

June temperatures (preliminary)

Global composite temp.: +0.34 C (about 0.61 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for June.

Northern Hemisphere: +0.51 C (about 0.92 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for June.

Southern Hemisphere: +0.17 C (about 0.79 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for June.

Tropics: +.38 C (about 0.68 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for June.

UAHJune2016

For monthly satellite temperature data go here.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/29mxELS
via IFTTT

Inside the Harsh Lives of Wild Carnivores: New at Reason

'The Hunt'Based on the approximately 1.2 zillion bugs-and-bunnies-avengers with Twitter and Facebook accounts who wanted to disembowel and eat a Minnesota hunter last year for killing Zimbabwe’s saintly Cecil the Lion last year, I’m guessing an eight-week documentary revealing that the animal kingdom is in large part composed of creatures who are neither pacifists nor vegans is going to come as a shocking and even traumatic surprise.

For misanthropes who still sport “NUKE THE WHALES” buttons from their last Fleshapoids concert, though, BBC’s The Hunt is likely to be a sublime experience. Orcas inflicting mass infanticide on humpbacks! South African falcons gorging on winged Indian termites! Ethiopian wolves ravaging giant mole rats! Nature in all its maniacal blood-drinking glory! Television critic Glenn Garvin explains more.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/298vr8P
via IFTTT

With 5 Million Unemployed, Spain Still Can’t Find Workers

With soaring youth unemployment, and close to 5 million people out of work overall, one would assume that the last problem Spain would encounter would be that it can’t find workers to fill open jobs.

However, as Bloomberg reports, Spain is facing labor shortages as employers struggle to find capable employees. “We were looking for people for two months. We managed to find one in Spain. We turned to Argentina for others” explains Samuel Pimentel, a headhunter who was searching for specialist consultants for a client.

Pimentel’s client asked for a list of candidates trained in”Agile” project management techniques for helping companies boost their productivity by using more IT systems. The client was even willing to pay $220,000 a year, almost 10 times the average salary in Spain, but Pimentel had a difficult time identifying candidates.

The main reason for this issue according to Valentin Bote, head of research at Randstad, a recruitment agency, is that the unemployed lack the skills to fill the available positions.

“It’s a paradox. The unemployment rate is too high. Yet we’re seeing some tension in the labor market because unemployed people don’t have the skills employers demand.” Bote said.

Companies are struggling to fill positions such as software developers, mathematical modelers, geriatric nurses and care workers. Although the unemployment rate is close to 20%,  Randstad estimates that companies may struggle to fill almost 2 million posts through 2020.

Spain has had seven different education laws since 1978 according to Bloomberg, but none have addressed fundamental problems that have led to a high-school dropout rate that is twice the European average. “Education and work exist in two alternative worlds that don’t really connect. While in other nations, like the US, college education is designed to get you a job, that’s not the case in Spain.” said Sandalio Gomez, a professor at the IESE Business School in Madrid.

We would argue that the US education system isn’t really designed to get students jobs per se, but we’ll save that topic for another day.

In Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy’s election manifesto, the People’s Party vowed to put more emphasis on technology in schools and get more students to learn English, but this issue has been decades in the making.

Even when senior posts are filled, Spanish companies are having to make due with lower-caliber candidates than their competitors in other European countries, and that hurts the profitability and resilience of companies the Bank of Spain said in its 2015 annual report.

Spain’s output is struggling to get back to its 2008 peak, and the skills gap is hindering the economy’s ability to get back to that level.

One thing to point out after discussing all of this is that while Spain’s youth unemployment soars, and a significant skills gap puts a drag on the economy, Spanish bond spreads are actually… tightening. Isn’t it amazing what can happen with a little bit of ECB magic to hide any fundamental issues in European economies – for now.

*  *  *

Of course, there could be another reason why they cannot fill job vacancies… no one ‘wants’ to work when the welfare state is sustaining your lifestyle (in return for your votes?)

via http://ift.tt/29hRWHJ Tyler Durden