Crude Is Crashing

As the Dollar Index surged post-manufacturing data, WTI Crude began to lose altitude from its overnight ramp. Combined with ongoing concerns over Libya’s production ramp, crude just crashed from over 55.00 to under 53.00 in minutes on heavy volume…

It seems the catalyst was the USD index breaking recent highs…

 

But as Bloomberg notes, Libya, the holder of Africa’s biggest crude reserves, is ramping up output from its biggest oil field again after two years of internal conflict, the latest reminder of just how vulnerable OPEC’s quest to clear a global crude glut might be.

The Sharara deposit in the Libya’s south west will ship almost 1.9 million barrels this month from its Zawiya port near Tripoli, according to a loading program obtained by Bloomberg. That compares with a pumping rate from the field of almost 9 million barrels a month as recently as late 2014, before internal conflict halted flows.

If maintained, the amount Libya is pumping would be about 125,000 barrels a day higher than the North African country was producing in October, thestarting point for when most other OPEC nations are supposed to limit their collective supply.

Mustafa Sanalla, the chairman of Libya’s National Oil Corp., said Dec. 21 that output would reach 900,000 barrels a day early of this year. By hitting that target, Libya would replace about one third of the supplies being cut by other OPEC nations.

via http://ift.tt/2iLwufT Tyler Durden

Trump Wins Again: Ford Cancels Plan For $1.6 Billion Mexican Plant, Expresses “Vote Of Confidence” In Trump

Trump’s recent “strong hints” to US-based automakers to keep production within the US are starting be heard loud and clear, and nowhere more so than at Ford, which just hours after observing the beat down Trump gave to competitor GM on Twitter, announced that it is scrapping plans for a new $1.6 billion plant in San Luis Potosi, Mexico after itself coming under criticism by Donald Trump for shifting small-car production south of the border, and announced it would instead invest $700m in a plant expansion in Flat Rock, Michigan.

Mark Fields, Ford’s chief executive officer, announced the plan today at a press conference at the automaker’s factory in Flat Rock, Michigan, south of Detroit. The second largest U.S. automaker builds the Mustang sports car and Lincoln Continental sedan from its Flat Rock plant, which employs more than 3,700 workers according to Bloomberg. Ford idled the factory for a week in October due to declining Mustang sales, which fell 13 percent in the first 11 months of 2016.

The automaker’s CEO Mark Fields told CNN that the move is a “vote of confidence” in President-elect Donald Trump’s pledge to create a pro-business environment. Fields emphasized, however, that he did not negotiate any special deal with Trump.

“We didn’t cut a deal with Trump,” he said. “We did it for our business.”

Trump had previously slammed Ford on the campaign trail over the automaker’s plan to invest $1.6 billion in Mexico by shifting its North American small-car production south of the border. Ford had emphasized that the move would not affect U.S. jobs because the automaker would be putting new vehicles into the Michigan plants.

But now Ford will instead build the Ford Focus at an existing plant in Mexico and invest $700 million in its plant in Flat Rock, Mich. in an effort to produce more electric and self-driving cars. The automaker has said it plans to build a fully self-driving car by 2021.

“I am thrilled that we have been able to secure additional UAW-Ford jobs for American workers,” said Jimmy Settles, United Auto Workers vice president, according to CNN.

And so, it would appear that Trump was right, and won, again.

Curiously, according to CNBC, a high level Ford source said that “Trump had nothing to do with Ford’s decision to expand its Michigan plant.”

Sure, it was just a bigly coincidence.

We look forward to his victory lap on Twitter in moments.

* * *

From the press release:

FORD ADDING ELECTRIFIED F-150, MUSTANG, TRANSIT BY 2020 IN MAJOR EV PUSH; EXPANDED U.S. PLANT TO ADD 700 JOBS TO MAKE EVS, AUTONOMOUS CARS

Ford today detailed seven of the 13 new global electrified vehicles it plans to introduce in the next five years, including hybrid versions of the iconic F-150 pickup and Mustang in the U.S., a plug-in hybrid Transit Custom van in Europe and a fully electric SUV with an expected range of at least 300 miles for customers globally.

The automaker also announced plans to invest $700 million to expand its Flat Rock Assembly Plant in Michigan into a factory that will build high-tech autonomous and electric vehicles along with the Mustang and Lincoln Continental. The expansion will create 700 direct new jobs.

The moves are part of a $4.5 billion investment in electrified vehicles by 2020, offering customers greater fuel efficiency, capability and power across Ford’s global vehicle lineup. The plans are part of the company’s expansion to be an auto and a mobility company, including leading in electrified and autonomous vehicles and providing new mobility solutions.

“As more and more consumers around the world become interested in electrified vehicles, Ford is committed to being a leader in providing consumers with a broad range of electrified vehicles, services and solutions that make people’s lives better,” said Mark Fields, Ford president and CEO. “Our investments and expanding lineup reflect our view that global offerings of electrified vehicles will exceed gasoline-powered vehicles within the next 15 years.”

Ford is focusing its EV plan on its areas of strength – electrifying its most popular, high-volume commercial vehicles, trucks, SUVs and performance vehicles to make them even more capable, productive and fun to drive.

The seven global electrified vehicles announced today include:

  • An all-new fully electric small SUV, coming by 2020, engineered to deliver an estimated range of at least 300 miles, to be built at the Flat Rock plant and sold in North America, Europe and Asia
  • A high-volume autonomous vehicle designed for commercial ride hailing or ride sharing, starting in North America. The hybrid vehicle will debut in 2021 and will be built at the Flat Rock plant
  • A hybrid version of the best-selling F-150 pickup available by 2020 and sold in North America and the Middle East. The F-150 Hybrid, built at Ford’s Dearborn Truck Plant, will offer powerful towing and payload capacity and operate as a mobile generator
  • A hybrid version of the iconic Mustang that will deliver V8 power and even more low-end torque. The Mustang Hybrid, built at the Flat Rock Plant, debuts in 2020 and will be available in the North America to start
  • A Transit Custom plug-in hybrid available in 2019 in Europe engineered to help reduce operating costs in even the most congested streets
  • Two new, pursuit-rated hybrid police vehicles. One of the two new hybrid police vehicles will be built in Chicago, and both will be upfitted with their police gear at Ford’s dedicated police vehicle modification center in Chicago
  • In addition, Ford announces that its global utility lineup will be the company’s first hybrids powered by EcoBoost® rather than naturally aspirated engines, furthering improving performance and fuel economy.

The company also plans to be as aggressive in developing global electrified vehicles services and solutions. These include EV fleet management, route planning and telematics solutions.

Building the Future

To support the new era of vehicles, Ford is adding 700 direct new U.S. jobs and investing $700 million during the next four years, creating the new Manufacturing Innovation Center at its Flat Rock Assembly Plant. Employees there will build the all-new small utility vehicle with extended battery range as well as the fully autonomous vehicle for ride-hailing or ride-sharing – along with the iconic Mustang and Lincoln Continental.

“I am thrilled that we have been able to secure additional UAW-Ford jobs for American workers,” said Jimmy Settles, UAW vice president, National Ford Department. “The men and women of Flat Rock Assembly have shown a great commitment to manufacturing quality products, and we look forward to their continued success with a new generation of high-tech vehicles.”

This incremental investment in Flat Rock Assembly Plant comes from $1.6 billion the company previously had planned to invest in a new plant in Mexico.

Ford today announced it is cancelling plans for the new plant in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. It also announced that, to improve company profitability and ensure the financial as well as commercial success of this vehicle, the next-generation Focus will be built at an existing plant in Hermosillo, Mexico. This will make way for two new iconic products at Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne, Michigan, where Focus is manufactured today – safeguarding approximately 3,500 U.S. jobs.

* * *

The Mexican peso is understandably unhappy following the news:

via http://ift.tt/2iEteWy Tyler Durden

Publicly-Funded Stadiums ‘Completely Ruled Out’ By Missouri’s Governor-Elect

I'm not paying for this.Missouri’s Governor-elect Eric Greitens told reporters yesterday that he has “completely ruled out state funding for stadiums.”

Greitens—who takes office next Monday—had recently affirmed his opposition to public funding for sports arenas, which he called “welfare for millionaires,” in a post to his Facebook page. But yesterday, Greitens made it clear that any stadium built in St. Louis for a Major League Soccer (MLS) expansion franchise will have to be built without the aid of state funds or tax credits, according to The St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

The city of St. Louis’s Board of Alderman has been considering adding a proposal seeking voter approval of $80 million in public spending on the prospective soccer stadium, which currently is estimated to cost $200 million. The Board has three more weeks to decide whether or not to put the measure on April’s municipal ballot, but without state support, the Board may not even bother with a city-wide referendum.

Current Gov. Jay Nixon (D-Mo.)—a proponent of public spending for both the soccer stadium and the disastrous St. Louis Rams football stadium deal—said in December that he supports the allocation of $40 million in state tax credits to clear and develop the inner city area around where the soccer stadium would be built, whether the stadium is built or not.

Governor-elect Greitens says he still hopes the MLS ownership group will raise the sufficient “private-sector funding to bring a soccer team to the state of Missouri,” but has been refreshingly (for a politician) skeptical of the rosy (some might say delusional) promises of economic benefit to the public put forth by by the ownership group and the Missouri Development Finance Board, which is currently stacked with Nixon appointees.

Read more Reason coverage on the folly of public funding for stadiums here.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2hNEyjF
via IFTTT

Silver Prices and the Russian Connection

Hold your real assets outside of the banking system in one of many private international facilities  –>    http://ift.tt/2cyFwvQ;

 

 

 

 

Silver Prices and the Russian Connection

Posted with permission and written by Gary Christenson (CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL)

 

 

 

Silver prices nearly reached $50.00 in April of 2011. They crashed to a low under $14 in December of 2015 and currently (December 2016) sit at about $16.

 

Silver prices, in our increasingly unreal debt based fiat currency world, streak higher and subsequently crash to unbelievable lows.

 

Option One: Silver prices are near the end of their correction and will rally substantially higher. Why? Exponential increases in debt and total currency in circulation lift the prices for nearly everything, including college tuition, cigarettes, the S&P, housing, health care, silver and gold. We have heard this before and we see the consequences of using our “fake money” every day.

 

Option Two: Silver prices reached a generational high in 2011 and will collapse even further in coming years. Why? Supposedly the crushing deflation will rule the world for several years and prices for stocks, bonds, real estate, gold and silver will crash to unbelievable lows. We have heard this before. Some prices will probably crash, but silver and gold should rise because they are real money and independent of (surging) counter-party risk.

 

The Silver to S&P 500 Ratio: This ratio shows the relative valuation of silver compared to stocks in the U.S. See the chart below for the ratio since 1990.

 

 

Silver is currently too low compared to the S&P 500 Index. We live in an exponential world – exponentially increasing debt, banker profits, silver prices, monetary nonsense and more. Examine the increase in U.S. national debt and the – more or less – parallel increase in silver prices – both on log scales.

 

 

 

Silver prices increase exponentially along with debt, currency in circulation, and consumer prices. However, if the world had cast aside economic delusions and returned to a world without central banks, fiat money, fractional reserve lending, unpayable debts … but I digress.

 

Assume that debt will continue to increase (it will as long as politicians and the Fed are “on the job”) and that the last 17 years of silver prices tell the story…

 

 

This chart uses a log scale and shows exponentially increasing prices. A green line connects highs since 2001 and another green line connects lows since 2001. The purple line is the geometric mean between the high and low boundary lines.

 

Prices are propelled higher above the purple line and then crash lower. Assume the purple line is an equilibrium line which suggests we will see the next multi-year move surge above the purple line.

 

Examine the deviation of the monthly price of silver as a percentage above or below the purple equilibrium line. Silver prices oscillate around the equilibrium line of zero on the following chart.

 

 

Silver is far below the equilibrium line and too low compared to its own exponential price history as well as compared to the S&P. The next major move should be UP!


WHY?


Ted Butler:

“The big theme, as I see it, is JPMorgan becoming more aggressive in acquiring physical silver and gold while at the same time reducing its COMEX short position in each almost as aggressively. It’s hard to imagine a more bullish backdrop for futures prices.”


Bill Holter: 


“I believe deflation will destroy financial assets and not stop until fiat currencies (including and specifically the dollar) themselves are destroyed. The coming credit event will wipe out currencies … and what is the result of grossly lower or worthless currencies? Hyperinflation.”


Currencies are created by increasing debt and are backed by nothing but hope, faith and confidence. Exponentially increasing debt is not sustainable. How long before the dollar, pound, yen and euro begin to resemble the Venezuelan and Argentinian currencies?

 

It is more sensible to own physical silver, knowing it is grossly undervalued compared to the S&P, national debt, total sovereign debt, and more.


THE RUSSIAN CONNECTION:


In accordance with the current blame-game promoted by the “fake news” diversions: We can blame Russia for HRC losing the election, releasing scandalous emails that the Democratic National Committee desperately wishes had remained private, the election of Trump, NSA spying on everyone, global terrorism, excess debt in the western world, the failure of hope and change, Federal Reserve monetary policy, unemployment, weak silver prices, strong stock markets, global bond market correction, the coming recession, derivatives disasters, slowing retail sales, Italian banking, cold weather, one brutally assassinated reindeer no longer able to pull Santa’s sleigh and a tardy delivery of goodies from the Easter Bunny next year…

 

 

Well … maybe Russia should not be blamed for all the above …

 

 

Please email with any questions about this article or precious metals HERE

 

 

 

 

Silver Prices and the Russian Connection

Posted with permission and written by Gary Christenson (CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL)

via http://ift.tt/2ivrnTk Sprott Money

Washington Post Admits Its ‘Russians Hacked A US Utility’ Story Was ‘Fake News’

Over the weekend we noted that the Washington Post was caught spreading “fake news” about an alleged attempt by “Russian hackers” to take over a Vermont Utility (see “Washington Post Caught Spreading More Fake News About ‘Russian Hackers’“).  Within hours of reporting that the “Russian hackers” had gained access to the electrical grid, the Burlington Electric Department in Vermont had to issue a statement confirming that the provocative Wapo story simply wasn’t true and that a laptop found to be infected with malware was never actually connected to the grid.  An embarrassed Wapo was subsequently forced to change it’s sensationalized headline and publish a retraction.

Now, as they often do, it appears this Wapo “fake news” rabbit holes gets even deeper.  Not only are “federal officials” now confirming that “Russian hackers” never targeted the Vermont electrical grid, but the whole mishap was derived from an employee’s attempt to check his Yahoo email account which, as Wapo reports, resulted in his computer connecting to a “suspicious IP address” that is “found elsewhere in the country suggesting the company wasn’t being targeted by Russians.

 

Moreover, not only was the malware not linked to a specific attempt of “Russian hackers” to penetrate the U.S. electrical grid, the software in question isn’t even linked to the “Grizzly Steppe” group that the Obama administration says is behind the DNC and John Podesta email hacks.  Of course, this is a direct contradiction to the opening paragraph of Wapo’s original story which directly connected the Vermont “hack” back to “Grizzly Steppe”…apparently with no evidence whatsoever.

U.S. officials are continuing to investigate the laptop. In the course of their investigation, though, they have found on the device a package of software tools commonly used by online criminals to deliver malware. The package, known as Neutrino, does not appear to be connected with Grizzly Steppe, which U.S. officials have identified as the Russian hacking operation. The FBI, which declined to comment, is continuing to investigate how the malware got onto the laptop.

Wapo goes on to point out that the “murkiness of the information” makes it difficult to relay meaningful information to the public about alleged “hackings.” 

The murkiness of the information underlines the difficulties faced by officials as they try to root out Grizzly Steppe and share with the public their findings on how the operation works. Experts say the situation was made worse by a recent government report, which they described as a genuine effort to share information with the industry but criticized as rushed and prone to causing confusion. Authorities also were leaking information about the utility without having all the facts and before law enforcement officials were able to investigate further.

Here’s an idea, how about you simply avoid reporting “murky” information until you have all the facts?  But that wouldn’t help advance your “Russian hacking” narrative now would it?

via http://ift.tt/2iLx7X4 Tyler Durden

GOOD NEWS EVERYONE: Sovereign Bond Yields Are Blowing Out Again

If this doesn’t deliver us to Dow 20,000 burger, nothing will.

What’s not to like over soaring sovereign bonds yields for some of the most indebted nations the world has ever known? Brace yourselves, inflation is coming.

Did you ever wonder how sharply higher borrowing costs for an economy with $20 trillion in debt might work out for proposed fiscal stimulus projects? We’ll soon find out!

img_5996

The euro crapping out v the dollar is a daily occurrence.

img_5997

And here’s Germany, land of the migrant. Bunds are up an astounding 10bps, a 53% move. Bankrupt Italy surging ahead too, all boolish news, apparently.

img_5998

Lastly, here a small reminder of debt/GDP ratios. Economics. It used to matter.

img_5999

Dow 20,000 here we come.

Content originally generated at iBankCoin.com

via http://ift.tt/2j0Ad8Z The_Real_Fly

Andrew Cuomo Vetoes Bill Aimed at Stopping NYPD’s Unjust ‘Gravity Knife’ Arrests

Last week New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo vetoed a bill aimed at stopping trumped-up arrests of innocent people for possessing tools that police arbitrarily identify as prohibited “gravity knives.” Cuomo acknowledges in his veto message that the current application of the state’s ban on gravity knives, which criminalizes possession of openly sold and commonly used tools, “is absurd and must be addressed.” But he argues that the revised definition in S.B. 6483A (a.k.a. A.B. 9042A) is ambiguous and would impose too heavy a burden on cops and prosecutors. Cuomo’s position is reasonable only if you think ordinary New Yorkers should bear the burden of demonstrating the legality of knives they bought at Home Depot to cut drywall, carpeting, or linoleum.

New York’s ban, which was enacted in 1958, defines a gravity knife as “any knife which has a blade which is released from the handle or sheath thereof by the force of gravity or the application of centrifugal force which, when released, is locked in place by means of a button, spring, lever or other device.” The law was meant to cover a substitute for switchblades, which New York legislators banned in 1954, that was modeled after knives carried by German paratroopers during World War II. The original gravity knife could be opened with one hand by pressing a button, trigger, or lever, relying on gravity instead of a spring, which was handy for injured paratroopers trying to free themselves from their parachutes. But New York City cops read the state’s definition of gravity knife to cover any folding knife that can be opened by flicking the wrist, even if the operation is difficult or can be accomplished only by grasping the blade and flicking the handle open.

“This interpretation of the ‘gravity knife’ has resulted in a definition that is both amorphous [and] subject to abuse and could include nearly any pocket knife,” Cuomo notes. “Under current New York law and practice, knives that are classified as ‘gravity knives’ are designed, marketed and sold as work tools for construction workers and day laborers at a variety of major retailers across the State. However, any person who goes into a store and purchases the product can be subsequently arrested and prosecuted for mere possession.” A 2007 case involved the Husky Sure-Grip Folding Knife, a top seller at Home Depot, which had sold more than 67,000 in New York state the previous fiscal year. That’s just one brand at one chain in one year. Applied consistently throughout the state, the NYPD’s wrist-flick test probably would transform hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of nonviolent knife owners into criminals. Cuomo rightly describes that situation as “an absurd contradiction [between] existing commercial and enforcement practices.”

A 2014 investigation by The Village Voice found that there had been some 60,000 cases involving gravity knife possession in New York City during the previous decade, making it one of the city’s most prosecuted crimes. Stops for allegedly illegal knives overwhelmingly target blacks and Latinos. “The vast majority of those arrested had no criminal intent and believed that the common folding knives they carried were legal,” notes the the preamble to S.B. 6483A, which was introduced by state Sen. Diane Savino, a Democrat who represents parts of Brooklyn and Staten Island. “These arrests and prosecutions do not contribute to public safety.”

In 2015 Savino proposed changing the law to allow conviction for possessing a gravity knife, which is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to a year in jail, “only if the defendant has intent to use the same unlawfully against another.” That bill died in the Senate. The 2016 version would have amended the definition of gravity knife to clarify that it “does not include a knife that has a spring, detent, or other mechanism, including but not limited to resistance to opening, designed to create a bias toward closure and that requires exertion applied to the blade by hand, wrist, or arm to overcome the bias toward closure and open the knife.”

Cuomo, whose veto was welcomed by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, worries that Savino’s revised definition “would potentially legalize all folding knives.” It is hard to see how, since a classic gravity knife does not have a bias toward closure that needs to be overcome by “exertion,” and neither does a spring-loaded switchblade. Cuomo also complains that Savino’s bill “would place the burden upon law enforcement to determine the design attributes of each given knife.” That burden seems unavoidable if New York legislators are 1) determined to ban certain kinds of knives and 2) bound by the basic due process principle that people must be given fair notice of the actions that make them subject to arrest and prosecution. When the law bans tools based on their “design attributes,” police have to be familiar with those, unless they simply arrest anyone with a pocket knife and let the courts sort it out, which is precisely the situation that Cuomo claims he wants to avoid.

Cuomo’s preferred solution is “allow[ing] crafts and tradespeople to possess these knives without penalty” while “creat[ing] an affirmative defense for those who possessed gravity knives with no intent to use it unlawfully.” The first exception would not necessarily prevent bogus arrests, since anyone carrying a folding knife that might fail the wrist-flick test would still have to show that he practiced an expiating occupation. The latter exception would not even prevent prosecution, since the “affirmative defense” could be presented only after a knife owner was arrested and hauled into court. In the name of making life easier for cops, Cuomo’s approach would leave innocent people subject to arbitrary police harassment.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2i6mEVh
via IFTTT

How Goldman Sees The S&P In 2017: First Rise, Then Fall

About 3 months ago, Goldman’s year end S&P500 target for 2016, 2017 and 2018 were 2,100; 2,200 and 2,300 respectively. Then, as readers are well aware, everything changed with the Trump election which unleashed a surge in US equities and the dollar, on expectations of reflation and fiscal stimulus. That prompted Goldman to boost its S&P price target by roughly 200 points across the board, as it merely tried to keep up with the price action.

Understandably, there was some confusion, so to address it, overnight Goldman’s chief equity strategist David Kostin released his first “weekly kickstart” report, which summarized Goldman’s latest goalseeked forecasts for the S&P500 as follows: “S&P 500 rose 9.5% for a total return of 12.0% in 2016; We forecast a 5% total return in 2017

The details:

[2016] year was a story of two halves: Cyclicals underperformed Defensives by 4 pp in the first half before reversing and outperforming by 18 pp in 2H. Energy was the best performing sector (+27%) while Health Care was the only sector with a negative full year return (-3%). Return dispersion averaged 25 pp ranking in the 43rd percentile vs. the last 30 years.

 

We expect dispersion will increase next year giving rise to better stock picking opportunities.

 

S&P 500 will rally to 2400 in 1Q 2017 alongside enthusiasm over corporate tax cuts but budget constraints will limit the magnitude of tax reform and fiscal spending and the index will fade to 2300 by year-end.

And the charts:

Finally, if anyone is still looking for absolute and risk-adjusted returns by key asset classes for 2016, here they are:

via http://ift.tt/2izlhzu Tyler Durden

Why State Colleges Shouldn’t Be Free (From a State College Grad)

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is about to announce plans to gift tuition at State University of New York (SUNY) schools to members of in-state households that make less than $125,000. That hefty income level is the same one that Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton pledged to while running for president last year.

Who makes less than $125,000 in New York state? A vast majority of households, it turns out. Out of about 7.2 million units (circa 2015), around 5 million make less than that sum. Statewide, New York households have a median income of about $61,000, which is $5,000 higher than the national average.

Tuition at four-year state schools averages about $6,470 (far below most other states in the region) and less still for community colleges (room and board at the four year schools will tack on another $10,000 or so to annual costs). The New York Times reports that the program, which adds on to existing programs, will cost somewhere around $163 million a year, though “though the administration acknowledges that estimate could be too low — or too high — depending on participation.” That’s very…comforting, as is the funding for the program: “It was not immediately clear how the program would be paid for,” writes the Times.

As it happens, New York already regularly tops most rankings of combined state and local tax burdens (the Tax Foundation figures the total bite at 12.7 percent of income while Wallethub says it’s 13.12 percent). So while there is apparently no ready money for this program, perhaps New Yorkers won’t notice or care.

So, why not make all in-state college tuition-free for kids unlucky enough to come from households making less than the 2X the median household income? I write as a SUNY-Buffalo grad (Ph.D. ’96), who also has two other degrees from state schools (Temple and Rutgers, M.A. and B.A., respectively).

I can think of at least three immediate concerns. First, as long as you’re redistributing income, that $125,000 income figure is way too high, as is plain from the income distribution to the right. There’s no question that New York, particularly the closer you get to New York city, is more expensive to live in, but there’s no rhyme or reason to naming a six-figure-plus income as the cut-off point (this is even more true in states with lower costs of living). New York doesn’t need greater tax-supported burdens that ultimately are going to help middle and upper-middle-class people the most, which is how this will inevitably shake out. The sons and daughters of more-educated, more-remunerated folks are more likely to go to college in the first place and a lot more likely to graduate in four or six years. If we believe that helping the least-advantaged among us is a good thing, then it would be far better to narrow the focus of the program to, say, students coming from the bottom 20 percent of households by income and giving them the sorts of support (intellectual and social) that might help them make it all the way through. As it stands, only about 20 percent of students from the bottom fifth of households have a college degree by age 24. That’s the same rate as in 1970. (And of course, educational reform should start at the K-12 level first and foremost, by making charter schools and vouchers more widely available to the students who would gain the most from them.) The fact is that middle-class (much less upper-class) kids do just fine, so if you’re trying to increase opportunities for the least privileged among us, it makes sense to start with people who need the most help.

Here are at two other points to consider: All students, regardless of who their parents are, should always have skin in the game. A college diploma raises average lifetime earnings by between $250,000 and $1 million (depending on many factors and assumptions) and it makes sense to ask the person who will cash that premium to pay for at least some part of it, doesn’t it? Even a small amount will also dissuade people who are not really committed to college, which is also a good thing. That leads to a larger point: Americans have been defining poverty upwards for at least a couple of decades now, all in a vain attempt to maintain the dysfunctional and unsustainable entitlement state and every loophole and carve-out for wealthier people. If you’re in a household making $125,000 a year, you’re in the top 16 percent of households and yet you need or deserve free college tuition, on top of non-means-testing of Social Security, Medicare, and whatever new entitlements will be created under a Republican government (the one, under George W. Bush, birthed Medicare prescription drugs after all)? Come on already.

If we agree that government is going to provide certain services and we also believe in limited government, it seems to me we should be narrowing the size and scope of the welfare state and the social safety net. The government should do less and cost less. Prices for everything, from education to health care to housing to retirement, would settle lower than where they are now and any assistance given to the needy would be far less-distorting than when everyone gets some level of free or heavily subsidized ride. This sort of plan obviously has little political backing at the moment, but it’s exactly the sort of revolution in thinking that needs to take place if the United States is going to stop its slide toward a sclerotic, low-growth, European-style political economy.

In 2011, Reason TV offered up 3 Reasons We Shouldn’t Bail Out Student-Loan Borrowers. Take a look:

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Like us on Facebook.
Follow us on Twitter.
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2j4Lol1
via IFTTT

USD Spikes To Highest Since Dec 2002 As EUR Tumbles

The better than expected Manufacturing data in the US has promoted further USD buying, sending the USD Index above 2016 highs back to it highest since Dec 2002.

The USD has taken out recent highs…

 

And EURUSD has plunged through 2016 lows to its weakest against the USD since 2003…

(note the spike and weakness since China adjusted its currency basket weightings)

via http://ift.tt/2hNxPWM Tyler Durden