Despite the brief media confusion this morning, at 2pm ET this afternoon, Trump unveiled his latest skill, namely the “art of exiting the deal” when he announced that he will pull the US out of the “unacceptable” Iran nuclear deal by not re-signing the sanctions waiver, while instituting the “highest level of sanctions” against Iran, even if Trump did not explicitly unveil new sanctions besides those which already existed.
There was more confusion over the timing of next steps, where as Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin announced, “Sanctions will be reimposed subject to certain 90 day and 180 day wind-down periods. At the conclusion of the wind-down periods, the applicable sanctions will come back into full effect. This includes actions under both our primary and secondary sanctions authorities.”
Adding to the complexity of the deal unwind is that the US decision was unilateral, with the rest of JCPOA signatory countries – Germany, UK, China, France and Russia – committed to remain in the deal. While we await responses from all signatories, so far the EU’s reaction has been the most vocal, with Europe vowing to uphold the Iran deal despite the US exit. How this can be implemented in practice despite Trump’s warning that any nations that transact with Iran will also be subject to sanctions, remains to be seen.
Further complicating matters is Iran’s stated desire to remain in the deal, and continue under the terms of the Nuclear Deal.
- IRAN SAYS WILL START TALKS WITH EUROPEAN NATIONS, CHINA, RUSSIA
- ROUHANI: FROM NOW ON, JCPOA IS BETWEEN IRAN AND 5 COUNTRIES
- IRAN IS COMMITTED TO ITS OWN OBLIGATIONS, U.S. IS NOT: ROUHANI
Iran’s reaction is understandable as a prompt, unilateral withdrawal from the deal risks crippling Iranian oil exports while raising the risk of an Israeli attack on its military and/or research facilities.
Still, now that the JCPOA deal in its original format no longer exists, it gives Israel a motive to launch a “preemptive” attack, as it can claim it is merely doing so now before Iran has fully developed nuclear weapons; meanwhile Iran’s new bff, Saudi Arabia, also has its eyes on Iran, which has become a proxy state for non-western forces in the region, including Russia and China, and thus is destabilizing to the existing status quo.
Yet even if it were to “remain” in the deal, Iranian oil output would likely be impaired modestly, with some estimating anywhere between 200k and 500kb/d being taken offline, and send the price of oil higher; that said, much of this has already been priced into the market. This was confirmed by WTI staying around $70 after the Trump announcement. An analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies concluded that the loss of Iranian volumes would be more likely to be replaced by US condensate and light oil barrels ‘if’ Iranian condensate/light ends are covered by the sanctions. “And even in that case, price discounts would be assumed if alternative light sources from Libya, Angola, and Nigeria were to reenter the market in volume.” Meanwhile, China might continue to import some oil from the United States to appease the president and deflect trade imbalance challenges.
The question then shifts to how Iran’s geographic neighbors may react, starting with…
Israel: as we noted earlier, PM Netanyahu wasted no time to express his pleasure with Trump’s announcement which took place just one week after the PM held an ornate and theatrical show, “proving” that Iran may have been developing nuclear powers:
- NETANYAHU CONGRATULATES TRUMP ON CORRECT DECISION
- NETANYAHU HAILS TRUMP’S ‘BRAVE’ DECISION TO LEAVE NUKE DEAL
As we discussed yesterday, the collapse of the deal in its current format may prompt Israel to launch a “preemptive” attack on Iran, which is one again “free” to develop nuclear weapons. All Israel would need is just the right provocation, or “false flag” event to frame the next middle eastern war as one of Iranian aggression.
* * *
Saudi Arabia: the Muslim country has once again found itself on the same side as Israel, amid the ongoing challenge for regional dominance and influence. Conveniently, in the upcoming proxy war between Iran/Syria on one hand and Israel/Saudi Arabia on the other, the Saudis have the backing of Trump and Europe, while Iran has the support of Russia, Turkey, Syria – of course, and most recently, China. Just like Israel, now that the deal is no more, Riyadh may also stage a false flag attack against itself (either blaming Iran or Iran-influenced Houthi rebels). Yet while such an extreme confrontation may not be especially likely, at least in the immediate future, it is guaranteed that Saudi Arabia together with Israel will do everything in their power to suppress Iran in every way possible.
* * *
Syria and Yemen: both war-torn nations are ideologically aligned with Iran, with Tehran military support and/or an Iranian-funded militia active in the two nations. The two nations are also directly and indirectly fighting Saudi Arabia and Israel, which have been arming and funding insurgent/rebel forces in the two countries. As such, it is likely that should the conflict with Iran escalate, than the regional wars involving Syria and Yemen will follow suit.
* * *
Europe: Unlike the US, Europe has expressed a desire to continue working under the parameters of the Nuclear Deal as Europe has been a happy client of Iranian oil exports which it tends to buy at below market prices. And while Iran will likely continue to export its oil to Europe (as well as Asia), it remains to be seen how strict Trump will be in his threats to crack down on any nation that engages Iran. However, one thing is certain: Iran – which will again be kicked out of SWIFT – will likely never again use US Dollars as the underlying currency in any deals or transactions.
* * *
Russia: Moscow has repeatedly warned the US not to exit the deal, and in this way Putin is aligned with Europe. Russia will continue to provide weapons to Iran/Syria in exchange not so much in exchange for commodities but to make sure that Russia preserves a critical middle eastern regional outpost and zone of influence in Iran, together with Syria.
* * *
China: for now Beijing’s intentions in the middle east remain unknown. That may change very soon as the posturing ahead of the next proxy war escalates.
via RSS https://ift.tt/2rtIwAR Tyler Durden