Parents Fight a Texas Hospital Over Their Daughter’s Life Support

|||Sudok1/Dreamstime.comTexas parents are fighting the Cook Children’s Medical Center in Fort Worth over the right to keep a nine-year-old girl on life support.

Payton Summons has cancer. A tumor, which was discovered near her heart, cut off her circulation, and on September 25 she went into cardiac arrest. She was given CPR for an hour at home before her parents took her to the hospital. Staffers there were able to revive her heartbeat, but they had to put her on a ventilator because she was unable to breathe on her own. On Thursday, the hospital declared her brain dead.

The hospital planned to take her off life support on Monday, despite her parents’ wishes. Instead, a Tarrant County judge granted Summons’ parents a 40-day temporary restraining order against the hospital.

The parents hope the restraining order will give them enough time find a facility that will help their daughter. They are in talks with a hospital in West Texas, and they’re open to options outside the state.

Justin Moore, the couple’s attorney, argues that the Texas Advance Directives Act gives the parents a right to find an alternative facility. The hospital claims that the law doesn’t apply in this case, since Summons has already been declared brain dead. Hospital attorney Laura Copeland has told a judge that it’s “traumatic for the staff to have to do things for a patient they know is dead.”

State District Judge Melody Wilkinson will reconsider the restraining order at a hearing scheduled for Friday morning.

The legal battle over Summons has some similarities with the death of British toddler Alfie Evans in April. Alder Hey Children’s Hospital told Evans’ parents that it would be “futile” and “unkind and inhumane” to keep treating the 23-month-old toddler, who suffered from a degenerative brain condition. Evans’ parents spent months contesting the decision, which they eventually appealed to the European Court of Human Rights. Evans was granted Italian citizenship, and a Vatican hospital announced that it was willing to receive the boy for treatment. Despite this, the hospital removed Evans from life support and he passed away a week later.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2Ixr9q1
via IFTTT

US Households Are Loaded Up On Stocks

Via Dana Lyons’ Tumblr,

Outside of the 2000 dotcom bubble, U.S. households have never had more of their assets invested in the stock market.

The U.S. stock market, i.e., the S&P 500, soared back to new all-time highs again today – always a welcomed development for investors. And it is especially welcomed now considering the fact that investors are loaded up with stocks at the moment. That information comes courtesy of one of our favorite investment related statistics.

From the Federal Reserve’s Z.1 release, we find that U.S. Households had a reported 34.3% of their financial assets invested in the equity market as of the 2nd quarter. Outside of a slightly higher reading in the 4th quarter of 2017, that is the highest level of stock investment in the 70-plus year history of the series, other than the 1999-2000 bubble top.

What is the upshot of this series – and its current reading? As we have discussed many times, this statistic is not necessarily an effective timing tool. It is what we call a “background” indicator in that it provides an instructive representation of the longer-term potential — and risk — of the stock market.

One thing we know about the investing public (and most investor groups for that matter) is that they are notoriously poor at timing markets. For example, they generally adopt their largest allocations at market tops. Thus, based on the current, historic level of household investment, we would determine the stock market to be carrying substantial risk – in the longer-term.

Again, this is not a great timing tool. It can, and has, remained elevated for years on end prior to any household investor comeuppance. However, just as households learned the hard way in 2000 (and 2015 and 2007 and 1972 and 1968 and 1966), don’t expect them to walk away from these extreme equity investment levels unscathed.

*  *  *

If you’re interested in the “all-access” version of our charts and research, please check out our new site, The Lyons Share. You can follow our investment process and posture every day — including insights into what we’re looking to buy and sell and when. Thanks for reading!

via RSS https://ift.tt/2Qsmvwl Tyler Durden

NYTimes Accuses Trump Of Making Hundreds Of Millions From Tax Dodges And “Outright Fraud”

In a massive, front page story, the NYT has accused President Trump of participating in “questionable” and “dubious” tax strategies “including instances of outright fraud” that greatly increased the fortune he received from his parents and allowed him to accrue millions of dollars in additional wealth from his father’s real estate empire “much of it through tax dodges in the 1990s.”

The NYT reported that Trump and his siblings set up a “sham” corporation to help disguise otherwise taxable income that came from gifts from their parents. The president also allegedly helped his father take improper tax deductions that amounted to millions of dollars, with the Internal Revenue Service reportedly providing little pushback against the Trumps’ reported tactics.

According to the Times’ investigation, “based on a vast trove of confidential tax returns and financial records” Trump received the equivalent today of at least $413 million from his father’s real estate empire, starting when he was a toddler and continuing to this day. And, in what will attract the most attention, the newspaper wrote that Trump’s behavior amounted to fraud in some cases.

The NYT reports that records indicate that Trump helped his father take improper tax deductions; he is also said to have helped formulate strategy to undervalue his parents’ real estate holdings

The Times interviewed former employees and advisers to Trump’s father and reviewed more than 100,000 pages of documents related to the Trump family business, including bank statements, financial audits and invoices.

Charles Harder, an attorney for the president, said in a statement to The New York Times that allegations of tax evasion are “100 percent false,” adding that Trump “had virtually no involvement” with the tax strategies used by his family, and instead delegated those tasks to others. Harder also implied that the newspaper could face a defamation lawsuit if it suggested Trump participated in a fraudulent tax scheme.

“The New York Times’s allegations of fraud and tax evasion are 100 percent false, and highly defamatory,” Mr. Harder said. “There was no fraud or tax evasion by anyone. The facts upon which The Times bases its false allegations are extremely inaccurate.”

The Times says that its findings “raise new questions about Mr. Trump’s refusal to release his income tax returns, breaking with decades of practice by past presidents.”

According to tax experts, it is unlikely that Mr. Trump would be vulnerable to criminal prosecution for helping his parents evade taxes, because the acts happened too long ago and are past the statute of limitations. There is no time limit, however, on civil fines for tax fraud.

Robert Trump, the president’s brother, issued a statement on behalf of the Trump family and said that all appropriate gift and estate taxes were paid after his parents passed away.

Developing.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2IzqXXi Tyler Durden

NBC “A Co-Conspirator In The Destruction Of Kavanaugh” According To Lindsey Graham

Senator Lindsey Graham, who made headlines last week after excoriating Democrats over their “unethical sham” investigation of Brett Kavanaugh, now says that NBC is a “co-conspirator” in the “destruction” of the Supreme Court nominee. 

In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Graham said: “NBC, they’ve been a co-conspirator in the destruction of Kavanaugh from my point of view,” he said. “… do you think NBC would’ve done that if this had been a Democratic male nominee? All I can say is that there the journalistic integrity has been destroyed over this case.” 

Graham, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, lambasted his Democratic colleagues for sitting on allegations of sexual assault levied against Kavanaugh by Stanford researcher Christine Blasey Ford. 

“If you wanted an FBI investigation you could have come to us. What you want to do is destroy this guy’s life, hold this seat open, and hope you win in 2020. You’ve said that, not me,” Graham seethed across the room. “This is the most unethical sham since I’ve been in politics and if you really wanted to know the truth, you certainly wouldn’t have done what you did to this guy.”

“Boy y’all want power, God I hope you never get it. I hope the American people can see through this sham, that you knew about it and you held it, you had no intention of protecting Dr. Ford, none!” he added. “I hate to say it because these have been my friends, but if you were looking for a fair process, you came to the wrong town at the wrong time.”

“I’m really upset that they knew about this in August and never told anybody,” Graham continued outside the hearing room following Ford’s Thursday testimony. “I’m really upset that [Feinstein] believed this was a credible allegation, [and] that you wouldn’t do Mr. Judge Kavanaugh the service of saying, ‘I’ve got this, what’s your side of the story.’” 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2IwiF2e Tyler Durden

“We’re Our Own Worst Enemy” – Midstream Constraints Threatens Permian Shale Boom

The US now pumps a record 11 million barrels a day in oil, surpassing both Saudi Arabia and Russia, and becoming the world’s largest oil producer. Behind this historic achievement is America’s most productive region, the Permian Basin in west Texas and New Mexico, where approximately one-third of the nation’s daily supply is extracted from the ground via hydraulic fracking.

However, the shale revolution has overwhelmed the region’s infrastructure with massive supply – driving up costs, depressing regional oil prices and slowing the pace of growth, according to Reuters.

The Trump administration has been cheering the country’s oil output rising to record levels, but some severe logistical constraints have developed – leaving many producers unable to turn a profit and encouraged some to drill elsewhere.

Consider the Permian Basin, the country’s largest oil field, which has increased production from 1.5 million barrels per day (bpd) to 3.43 million bpd, in the last three years. The influx of new supply has strained pipeline capacity for Permian Basin producers and is not expected to exceed overall oil production until late in 2019 or early 2020. Several new pipelines are expected to be operational in the next several years, but in the meantime, producers are resorting to rail and trucks in higher frequency.

Shortages of human labor, water, and even fuel used in fracking are skyrocketing the cost of production.

At the same time, Permian producers are being paid $17 a barrel below West Texas Intermediate (WTI). Sellers have to offer the discount to compensate for the higher transport costs, said Reuters.

We’re our own worst enemy,” said Ross Craft, chief executive of Approach Resources, a West Texas oil producer which last year averaged about 11,600 barrels per day. “We can drill, bring these wells on so quickly that we basically outpace the market. It is going to take a little bit of time,” for the infrastructure to catch up to producers.

Since mid-2016, the number of drilling rigs in the Permian rapidly increased, but the momentum is now slowing, in part because of the deep discount of Permian oil versus WTI.

With the shale revolution in danger, the number of uncompleted wells in the Permian jumped by 80% to 3,630 in August compared with a year earlier, according to US Energy Department data. Outside of the shale bubble, uncompleted wells are only up 10% from the same period a year ago.

ConocoPhillips and Carrizo Oil & Gas are reducing their operations in the Permian. Each has moved a Permian rig to another oilfield, and Conoco idled a second, Reuters said. Noble Energy also scaled back rigs in the region and said it is transferring resources to Colorado.

John Hopkins, a managing partner at Global Drilling Partners, said they were ready to drill at least seven wells with a Permian operator this summer, but those plans fell apart due to the lack of pipeline capacity.

“There will be a shift out of West Texas temporarily until they can solve their midstream problems,” he said. Companies are looking to boost their drilling in other fields in Texas, Colorado and Oklahoma, he said.

The deep price discount on Permian oil has damaged the equity price of some shale producers such as Parsley Energy, which operates rigs only in the Permian. Parsley delivered an eight fold-rise in profits in the second quarter versus a year earlier and boosted output by 57% over the same period. But investor still dumped the equity because of concerns that plans to increase production by another 5% by spending 17% more will deliver diminishing returns.

Wood Mackenzie, a global energy consultancy group, published a report that estimates Permian oil production in 2019 will be 200,000 bpd lower than it could be because of infrastructure constraints. Permian output will be 3.9 million bpd in 2019, Wood Mackenzie estimates, but if proper infrastructure was in place, production could have soared well above 4.1 million bpd.

“We’ve had a more significant increase in costs this year than we would have assumed,” Timothy Dove, chief executive of Pioneer Natural Resources, one of the largest Permian oil producers, said in August.

Some producers are being forced to use truck and railcar as pipeline capacity has reached its upper limits. In return, oil by truck to Gulf Coast refinery and export hubs costs $15 to $25 a barrel, compared to $8 to $12 a barrel by rail and less than $4 a barrel by pipeline, according to Reuters’ market sources.

“Truck traffic is unlike anything we’ve ever seen,” said James Walter, co-CEO of Colgate Energy, a Midland-Texas based oil producer, who adds his company has contracts to transport all of its crude and gas production via pipelines.

Reuters noted that rail capacity will not increase because oil producers are not signing long-term contracts to lease cars. They would prefer to wait for the new pipelines to be built. Meanwhile, rail companies are reluctant to purchase new oil railcars without long-term contracts.

“We do think it’s a short-term situation,” Union Pacific Executive Vice President Beth Whited said in July. “So we will not invest to support that.”

Meanwhile, Jean Laherrere at Forecast For U.S. Oil & Gas Production shows the Permian oil production peaking sometime in 2019.

And so with logistical hurdles surpassing oil price as the key extraction bottleneck, one wonders if we have finally hit peak shale?

via RSS https://ift.tt/2zNGCzz Tyler Durden

Republicans Bet On Stocks After Trump’s Win, While Democrats Bought Bonds, Study Shows

While President Trump’s upset electoral victory two years was a boon for Republicans who supported the president’s “American First” agenda, it sent many Democrats into paroxysms of outrage. And while Democrats have filtered every major policy achievement of the Trump age through a lens of cynicism, Republicans chose a more optimistic tack.

And as it turns out, Republican voters have benefited from that outlook, not just emotionally, but financially as well.

To wit, a paper published by researchers at the MIT Sloan School of Business summarized by Bloomberg revealed that Republicans upped their exposure to US stocks after Trump’s victory, while Democrats poured their money into bonds. This has led to a cavernous gap in returns, as Republicans have reaped the rewards of the Trump economic and market boom, while Democrats have been largely left behind.

According to the paper, following the 2016 election, Democratic voters reported feeling much more pessimistic about the state of the economy, while Republicans reported feeling more optimistic. This divergence in worldviews, according to the study’s authors, supports the rational-expectations theory of asset pricing, i.e. that trading activity arises as different groups of investors embrace divergent theories of how publicly available information will impact markets.

Prior to the election, differences in Republicans’ and Democrats’ portfolios were relatively minor. But after the vote, some of the changes in investing strategy could be attributed to hedging needs that arose as Republican voters tended to be employed in industries that would be positively impacted by Trump’s presidency, while Democratic voters tended to live in industries that might be negatively impacted. But after controlling for these factors, the researchers were able to show that differences in investment strategies after the election arose from biases inherent to the different groups, such as their outlook for the global economy.

Compared with Democrats, Republican investors actively increase the share of equity and market beta of their portfolios. Meanwhile Democrats increased their exposure to bonds and other “safe” investments.

Since the vote, the S&P 500 has returned more than 40%, while the PIMCO Total Return Fund, by comparison, has returned a paltry 1.6%.

Stocks

But please, tell us again about how Trump’s victory would drive American to an inevitable economic meltdown.

Read the paper below:

 

Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice by Zerohedge on Scribd

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2y8U9zr Tyler Durden

Fight Fizzles Before Police Arrive; Cops Start Tasing and Arresting People Anyway

When two of her sons got into a heated argument in August, a Texas mother thought a call to police might help the situation. But by the time the cops arrived, things had settled down. So why were three brothers arrested and one of them tased?

Sammie Anderson’s story began when two of her adult sons—23-year-old Matt Bateman and 21-year-old Grant Bible—started arguing. Afraid that words might turn into blows, Anderson tells The Dallas Morning News, she got between them and said, “Someone better call the police.”

Grant’s girlfriend, Victoria Floyd, made the call. By this point Bateman had picked up a tool, possibly a sledgehammer, which Floyd duly mentioned to the dispatcher. But Matt and Grant soon calmed down, and dash camera footage shows police arriving to a relatively quiet scene.

“There was no physical altercation, no arguing,” DeSoto Police Chief Joseph Costa tells the Morning News. But the situation wouldn’t stay calm for long. The footage shows police repeatedly ordering everyone to “get on the ground,” even after being told that “no one’s fighting.”

The full dash camera video can be seen below:

About one minute into the video, another of Anderson’s sons, 18-year-old Sam Bible, walks into view. According to the Morning News, Sam had just gotten home from work and was not involved in his brothers’ argument.

Sam appears to get down on his knees, but his body is partially out of the frame. The police keep telling him to “get down on the ground,” and his mother gets up and walks over to encourage him to listen. “He’s not resisting,” Anderson tells the officers. Then one of them tackles her to the ground. Later in the video, another officer claims she was subdued for touching him.

Two officers can then be seen drawing weapons, which Costa later said were stun guns. Soon everyone is on the ground, and police start handcuffing them.

One of Anderson’s sons apparently didn’t want to be handcuffed. The Morning News reports:

An officer approaching Grant Bible, 21, who is on the ground face down, says, “You need to calm down or you’ll be tased.” Two other officers are standing over him as they handcuff him. Someone says, “Don’t touch me.”

Over the next roughly 40 seconds, at least four officers surround Grant and hold him down as he screams. The footage doesn’t clearly show where officers were tasing him.

Grant and Sam were eventually arrested for interfering with officers. Matt, meanwhile, was taken into custody for alleged domestic violence against his girlfriend, who signed a sworn affidavit saying “he has never assaulted me.” Floyd also told police that Matt had hit his 15-year-old brother, Ty. All three brothers have pleaded not guilty.

Sam and Grant lost their jobs while they were in custody, and Anderson had to seek hospital treatment for several sprains and bruises. She ended up losing her job as well.

Anderson has filed a complaint claiming excessive use of force, but Costa insists his officers did nothing wrong. “With the information I have and relative to the video you have, our officers acted appropriately to the incident they responded to,” he tells WFAA.

The DeSoto Police Department’s internal affairs division is investigating the incident.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2y82mnw
via IFTTT

September U.S. Auto Sales Plunge, Most OEMs Miss Pessimistic Estimates

In line with the preview published here last week, auto sales numbers for September are in and, as expected, it has been an extremely ugly month for car makers. Results from Ford, Honda, Nissan, Toyota and Fiat all tell the story of an industry that had a terrible month, with few silver linings. Three of these names posted double digit percentage declines in YOY sales and three of them missed analyst estimates.

Here are the lowlights from across the industry:

  • Ford posted an 11% drop, missing analyst estimates of 9.1%. The F-Series pickup line ended a 16-month streak of sales gains. Mustang sales were down 1.3%. 
  • Nissan posted a 12.2% drop in September. Nissan and Infiniti brand car sales fell by 36%, including a 28% drop for the Altima sedan as the company prepared to start selling an all-new version this week.
  • Toyota sales were down 10.4%, far below estimates of 6.7% for the month. Combined sales for Toyota and Lexus brand cars fell 25.3%. 
  • Fiat posted the only true “beat”, as sales rose 15% versus analyst estimates of 8%. However, the Chrysler brand fell 7% to 14,683 vehicles and the Fiat brand fell 46% to 1,185 vehicles. The deficit was made up on Jeep sales, which were up 14%, as well as sales of Ram pickups and minivans.
  • Volkswagen of America car sales were down 4.8%
  • GM third quarter total sales were down 11%. The company stopped reporting monthly numbers earlier this year, with many suspecting that weakness in the production pipeline is responsible; they were right. 

Ford also posted an astounding drop in car sales, which fell 25.7% as a segment. 

As we had previously predicted, the lack of incentive outlays seemed to be the primary driver for the poor numbers

The impact of shrinking incentives was best observed in many of the “mainstay” sedan models among U.S. households, as many are switching to trucks and SUVs:

  • Honda Civic sales were lower by 30% 
  • Honda Accord sales were lower by 15% 
  • Toyota Camry sales were lower by 20%
  • Toyota Corolla sales were lower by 36%

Most manufacturers found their strongest points with trucks and SUVs. Nissan, for example, saw combined truck sales rise 6.6%. This included gains of 71% for the Frontier mid-size pickup and a 57% gain for the Titan. The Rogue SUV was down 11%. Fiat outsold Ford, 199,819 to 196,496 in cars, SUVs and light trucks. 

For Toyota, Highlander and 4Runner SUV sales rose, cauterizing Toyota’s light truck sales decrease at just 0.3%.

Vehicle ASP seems to be the “silver lining” that many optimists are trying to pull from this otherwise terrible month. Kelley Blue Book reported that the industry average price paid at dealerships was $35,742, a gain of 2%, while the average Ford buyer paid $36,040, up $1,500 from last year. According to Cox Auto, the average new vehicle price rose $687, or 2%, from September last year.

That however may be at the expense of still easy loans: the average new car loan jumped $724 year-over-year to $30,958 in Q2 2018, while used vehicle loan amounts increased $520 to reach $19,708, both records.

Many OEMs blamed the poor YOY numbers on last year’s Hurricane Harvey, which spurred more buying in its aftermath to make for tougher comps and this year’s Hurricane Florence, which is being blamed for a lack of buyers. 

Ford’s Mark LaNeve called September a “tale of two hurricanes” on this morning’s conference call. “Hurricane Florence was a big factor this month.”

Others chose to leave the past in the rearview mirror and focus on the future: Kurt McNeil, GM U.S. vice president for sales, was looking forward to Q4: “Our brands are very well-positioned for the fourth quarter when our next wave of new products start shipping in high volume.”

However, experts at AutoTrader still see headwinds for the industry as a result of rate hikes. 

Michelle Krebs, senior analyst with researcher AutoTrader, said: “It’s a very hard comparison with last year. But we do see headwinds building, with higher interest rates being the major one. We anticipated the last part of the year would be challenging and now we’re seeing that. Wages aren’t rising fast enough to keep up with inflation and that is keeping some people out of the market.”

Just days ago, we outlined that September was shaping up to be a brutal month for auto sales. At the time, estimates released by Edmunds were expecting a new vehicle sales collapse both on a monthly basis and year-over-year basis. Edmunds predicted that 1,392,434 new cars and trucks would be sold in the U.S. in September, which equals a estimated seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 17 million.

At the time, Jeremy Acevedo, Edmunds’ manager of industry analysis, stated: “Vehicle replacement demand following Hurricane Harvey bolstered auto sales last September, and Hurricane Florence has had a very limited impact on auto sales this month, which are the primary reasons why we’re seeing this year-over-year decline. With that said, a SAAR of 17 million is certainly not an unhealthy number — September is still shaping up to be a robust month for sales.”

On the other hand, with rates ticking up again since then and making auto loans and leases that much more expensive with the average new car payment hitting a record $525 per month…

… it is debatable whether the picture will get any more “robust” in October, or the rest of the year for that matter. 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2RkFx8T Tyler Durden

Trump’s Top Econ Advisor Accuses Goldman Of Slanting Research To Help Democrats

Over the weekend we reported that as increasingly more banks evaluate the worst case scenario in the ongoing US-China trade war, we highlighted that Goldman Sachs, which assigns a 60% probability the US will impose tariffs on most or all of the additional $267 billion of imports from China that are not covered by the tariffs announced to date, issued a warning that whereas so far S&P profits and margins have been able to avoid a direct hit, this may change soon:

“Tariffs threaten corporate earnings through higher costs and lower margins. Conservatively assuming no substitution or pass-through of expenses, we estimate a 25% tariff on all imports from China could lower our 2019 S&P 500 EPS estimate by roughly 7% (from $170 to $159), resulting in no EPS growth next year.”

And while Goldman did not predict a severe impact to either the market or stocks, the bank’s chief equity strategist David Kostin repeated an analysis he made three weeks ago, warning that if trade tensions spread significantly and a 10% tariff were implemented on all US imports – the highest rate since 1940s – the bank’s EPS estimate could fall by 15% to $145 in the “severe case”, resulting in a bear market for equities; a less draconian scenario of imposing 25% tariffs on all Chinese imports would wipe out all corporate profit growth in 2019.

As it turns out, Goldman’s analysis made its way all the way to the White House, and on Tuesday Kevin Hassett, the chair of President Donald Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers, took heavy aim at the Goldman Sachs research team, which he claimed was overtly political and negative toward Trump’s policies.

Asked during an interview on CNN about the conclusion of the analysis by the Goldman equity strategists – which as noted above showed that Trump’s potential tariffs could wipe out corporate profit growth in 2019 and offset all the stimulative benefits of other policies, Hassett compared the analysts to the Democratic Party.

“I haven’t read that report, but the Goldman Sachs economic team almost at times look like they are the Democratic opposition,” Hassett said, which is ironic as it was former Goldman COO, Gary Cohn, who led Trump’s economic team for over a year.

Hassett dismissed those concerns, and pointed to Goldman Sachs’ previous analysis that the GOP tax cut bill would do little to boost economic growth, which was “really, really wrong and timed in a partisan way” and served as evidence the bank’s latest analysis was flawed.

“Their analysis of the tax cuts was really, really wrong,” Hassett said. “And timed in a partisan way. So maybe they are trying to make a partisan point before the elections.”

Lastg year, ahead of the passage of the GOP tax law, Goldman economists estimated that the tax law would boost US GDP growth modestly, by only 0.3% in 2018 and 2019.

Hassett’s comments came as the Trump administration has taken aggressive steps to defend the decision to start a trade war with China. On Monday, the president hit back at critics of the tariffs during a press conference announcing the new US-Mexico-Canada trade deal: “By the way, without tariffs, we wouldn’t be talking about a deal,” Trump said. “Just for those babies out there that talk about tariffs.”

Watch the exchange below.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2P5sPJM Tyler Durden

Bezos’ Decision to Rasie Wages is Largely a Machiavellian Distraction

For the many low wage Amazon workers — both full time and temporary — set to receive a raise thanks to the just announced boost in minimum pay to $15/hour, the news is certainly a big plus. It should also be noted that had Amazon not been subject to intense scrutiny and criticism from the likes of Bernie Sanders and others, Jeff Bezos never would have responded with such an aggressive move. That said, if you think a little beyond the surface level about why he’s doing this now and what his real motives are, it becomes clear nobody should take this move at face value.

Stacy Mitchell, co-director at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, is someone whose work on Amazon I’ve cited on various occasions. She tweeted out an important thread this morning that helps you take a step back and not miss the forest for the trees.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg https://ift.tt/2zMtIBV
via IFTTT