If Greek Banks Don’t Expect Any Stress-Test Problems, Why The Need For More Liquidity?

Greek Flag

The European Central Bank is planning to release the results of its stress tests for large banks in the Eurozone next week, and this obviously goes hand in hand with the necessary unrest and nervousness on the financial markets. Approximately 130 banks in the Eurozone will be tested to see how well-capitalized they are and how they will be able to cope with a future crisis. The main intent of these tests was to increase the confidence in the Eurozone banking system again as investors still aren’t convinced of the strength of the Euro-banks.

It’s quite obvious the results of the banks of the weaker Eurozone nations such as Italy and Greece will be followed closely, and in light of these events’, it’s interesting to see the Greek minister of Finance publicly stated that he ‘does not expect any problems for the Greek banks’. That’s a bold statement, as the Greek banking sector was (and probably still is) the weakest link in the Eurozone banking system. The main banks in Greece were only kept afloat after a multi-billion euro rescue package provided by the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund, ‘sponsored’ by the European Union.

The Greek central bank has performed its own stress tests and this resulted in the main banks already having raised additional capital to strengthen their buffers. But it goes without saying that everybody expects the ECB tests to be more difficult to pass than the internal Greek stress tests, and even though the Greek minister of finance seems to be convinced ‘his’ banks will pass the test, we aren’t fully convinced yet. Granted, the economy in Greece seems to be on the right track again with a primary surplus, but let’s not forget the Greek citizens hardly notice anything of that.

To be honest, it would be a big surprise for us if none of the Greek banks would pass the test without any remarks. Even though the ‘Big 4’ in the Greek financial world (National Bank of Greece, Piraeus Bank, Alpha Bank and Eurobank) which have a market share of roughly 90% are expected to make a combined net profit of 4.5 billion Euro in the 2014-2016 era, the big question will be whether or not this will be enough to strengthen the cushions even further. It’s not unlikely Greece will have to use the remaining 11B EUR in the Hellenic Financial Stability Fund to back more capital injections in its banks.

Gikas Hardouvelis Greek Minister of Finance

The Greek Minister of Finance

Additionally, despite the confidence of the Greek minister of finance, the European Central Bank has announced it has been providing additional liquidity to the Greek banks. Through an inventive trick of reducing the discount rate of the Greek bonds which were pledged as collateral, the credit lines for the Greek banks are increasing. At this moment the banks have to take a 60% discount to the face value of the Greek bonds when they use it as collateral to get a loan from the European Central Bank. This discount will now be lowered to less than 50%, and even though some people say this is caused by an improving economic situation in Greece, it could also be a cheap trick to make sure the market knows that the Greek banks could easily tap the ECB for more funds. The general expectation is that a lower discount rate will make an additional 10-15 Billlion Euro available for Greece’s four largest lenders, which (even though this sounds like an unimpressive amount) is twice the combined net profit of the Big Four over the next three years.

Apart from Greece, we are also very cautious about the situation of the Italian banking sector. Even though most Eurozone banks were holding off on the ECB LTRO financing in September, the Italian banks were extremely interested in the cheap funding. And only the results of the stress tests will tell us whether or not the Italians are seeing opportunities to make some money with cheap loans or if there was a small liquidity crisis which had to be nipped in the bud.

On top of that, it’ll also be interesting to see how the Austrian banks will perform in the test, as both Raiffeissen Bank and Erste Group have been expanding into Eastern Europe in the past, and are exposed to troublesome regions such as Ukraine and Russia. Interesting times are ahead, and we’re looking forward to see how well the Eurozone banks are prepared for another turmoil. Be prepared for a lot of volatility in the financial sector if there would be some negative surprises

** Check out our latest Gold Report!

Sprout Money offers a fresh look at investing. We analyze long lasting cycles, coupled with a collection of strategic investments and concrete tips for different types of assets. The methods and strategies from Sprout Money are transformed into the Gold & Silver Report and the Technology Report.

Follow us on Twitter @SproutMoney




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1yldvKH Sprout Money

Harley Bassman: “The Fed Is Trying To Land A Jumbo Jet On A Football Field”

Once upon a time, one of the best sell-side analysts in the MBS space was Merrill Lynch’s “Convexity Maven” Harley Bassman: he was so good, in fact, he was quickly soaked up to the buyside, or at least the prop-trading side, when several years ago he left Merrill to join Credit Suisse as a prop trader. It was here that he provided some insightful trade ideas such as “The “Anti-Widowmaker” Trade: Get Paid To Wait For The Japanese House Of Card To Collapse” and previewed the “Inevitable ‘Taper‘” at a time when most still didn’t think the Fed was running out of paper to monetize. Then, about a year ago, Bassman disappeared again, only to reappear in a new capacity at recently-troubled bond manager Pimco. It is from here that following a year-long silences, he has just sent out his latest letter, in which he picks up on his favorite topic: implied volatility in rates, and the arbitrage opportunities it provides courtesy of epic risk mispricing in the current quote-unquote market, courtesy of the Fed’s 6 year+ centrally-planned manipulation of, well, everything. 

From Harley Bassman

Financial Market Cognitive Dissonance?

  • Presently, the financial markets are confronted with two conflicting pricing structures: a U.S. dollar yield curve that anticipates a significant increase in interest rates over the medium term, and an options market that offers “rate insurance” at the lowest prices in decades. 
  • Markets may appear confounded by cognitive dissonance, but forward-looking investors can peer through the fog: A return to a more recognizable risk/return profile, even if market returns are lower overall (as may well be the case over the secular horizon), could help investors more confidently align longer-term objectives with strategies.
?In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress or discomfort caused by holding two or more contradictory beliefs at the same time, or from receiving new information conflicting with existing beliefs, ideas or values.

Presently, the financial markets are confronted with two conflicting pricing structures: a USD yield curve that anticipates a significant increase in interest rates over the medium term, and an options market that offers “rate insurance” at a historically low cost.

An investment conundrum …

Woe to the investor who fails to heed the admonishment: “Don’t fight the Fed.”

And so it has been for the past five years that the Fed has implemented a grand scheme to increase monetary velocity via financial repression (zero interest rate policy, or ZIRP, and asset substitution) to create inflation, depreciate nominal debt and delever both the public and private economies of the United States .

Yet we have all seen this movie before; we know that the calm financial landscape the Fed has engineered will at some point become roiled. But let’s be clear, this is not a dire prediction for calamity, in our view, it is just a notification that today’s placid financial market will eventually return to a more normal risk profile.

The yield curve appears to be fully awake to the possibility that the Fed could lift the heavy hand of financial repression – at least that is one interpretation of a still-steep yield curve. While substantially flatter than its peak earlier this year, the current (as of 8 October) level of the benchmark two-year Treasury versus 10-year Treasury spread of 176 basis points (bps) is well above its 20-year average of 124 bps.

Yet this notice remains undelivered to the options market as the cost of interest rate insurance, quoted short-hand as the measure of implied volatility, is still near its “forever” low. Currently (as of 8 October) a three-month option on the 10-year swap rate sports an implied volatility of 69 bps versus its 20-year average of 105 bps. To apply some context to this statistical gibberish, an implied volatility at this level suggests a daily move of barely 4 bps. A more salient interpretation: Such a level of implied volatility creates a “break-even” range of less than +/? 16 bps for an entire month – a rather confounding number when one considers that the 10-year rate traversed 104 bps in two months during last year’s Taper Tantrum.

Some may view the shape of the yield curve and the level of implied volatility as two independent and separate observations, but in fact they are historically well-linked. While it might be easy to rely upon charts and graphs to support this notion, instead I would like to present a heuristic parable as to why the linkage between these two risk vectors may soon revert toward their more normal relationship.

In Figure 1, the eggplant line is the yield spread between the two-year swap rate and the 10-year swap rate while the avocado line is the level of implied volatility for a three-month expiry option on this same 10-year rate. While “conjoined twins” they are not, it is clear that these two risk vectors mostly have traversed a similar path over the past 20 years, at least until recently. While we might engage in a series of compounding differential equations to support this relationship, instead let’s just apply some common sense.

A forward rate is often described as the market’s “prediction” of where interest rates will be at some given time in the future. Let me please dispel you of that notion: No one paced the corner of Wall Street and Broad (or the local Newport Beach Starbucks) taking a poll. A forward is simply the mathematical discounting of the spot curve to produce an “arbitrage free” price, no more, no less. That said, I will concede that the spot curve does contain meaningful information about how market participants value risk, and as such, there is significant value to be gained by analyzing the shape of the forward surface.

In a brief digression for those who are unfamiliar with the concepts of spot and forward rates, let’s consider this hypothetical decision process. You have been entrusted with investing your mother’s retirement funds. You can buy either a one-year CD at 2% or a two-year CD at 3%: Which do you choose? The action you take depends upon where you think you can purchase another one-year CD next year to make this an apples-to-apples comparison (so both investments have a two-year horizon). You would take the former investment only if you were confident the one-year “forward” CD could be purchased at 4% (or higher). (2% for the first year plus 4% for the second year is roughly equal to 3% for both years.) In broad strokes, this is the definition of a forward rate: It is the level of rates in the future that creates indifference today.

Back to our main point: When the spot curve is flat, the forward curve will also be flat at about the same level. However, when the spot curve gains some shape, forward rates will diverge from spot rates. The steeper (or more inverted) the yield curve, the greater the distance between the spot price and the forward price.

Until Brian Greene can find a wormhole into the multi-verse, time only can travel forward and the future must become the present. With no consideration as to whether the forward grinds to the spot or a spot price heads to its forward, a larger spread reasonably implies a greater uncertainty of the outcomes. And since implied volatility tends to be a function of uncertainty (risk), option prices tend to rise in conjunction with a steeper (or more inverted) yield curve.

The current situation is nearly the dictionary definition of cognitive dissonance: the discomfort experienced when one tries to hold two contradictory beliefs at the same time.

The yield curve is presently so steeply sloped that the one-year rate is implied to double in six months and the two-year rate seems slated to triple in two years. Even the less volatile five-year rate might be over 100 bps higher as spring turns to summer in 2016. Yet despite this uncertainty embedded into the yield curve, most measures of implied volatility are near their “forever” lows.

The hemoglobin line in Figure 2 is a cousin of the well-known MOVE Index (the VIX of interest rates). Annotations show the events that locally drove volatility over the past 20 years; the current reading of 63 is extraordinarily low. Moreover, even a cursory glance would inform one that on the few times this index has breached 60, some sort of significant event has soon followed to pressure option prices higher.

While anecdotal, this evidence suggests there is a limit as to how far the shape of the yield curve can diverge from the level of volatility. The malibu line in Figure 3 charts the ratio between the difference of the two-year rate today and one-year forward (often called the “carry”) and the cost of a one-year option on the two-year rate.

A Wall Street aphorism for option traders describes the “three-to-one rule.” Here, one measures the interest rate income embedded in the yield curve (the “carry”) and compares this to the cost of an option of similar tenor. When this ratio reaches three to one, the trader should buy the option.

What is the source of this rule? Let’s skip the math and just consider this as a game. Assume one has no opinion as to whether the spot or forward price will be realized in the future. So if asked to weigh the odds of either outcome, the only rational ex ante guess is a “coin flip.” Unless you can employ a trick coin, the fair payoff for a “flip” should be two to one. As such, it is completely anomalous that one could buy an option for one dollar that will pay out three dollars if the rate structure remains unchanged (forwards accrete to spot). In essence, one is being offered a three-to-one payoff for a two-to-one risk. The option price is simply too low for the risk embedded in the yield curve. It is this notion that underpins the usually tight correlation between the yield curve and implied volatility, and why payoff ratios tend to remain below two to one.

As much as it distracts from a good story, the fact of the matter is that it is never “different this time.” Risk and return are tightly linked except for those rare periods when investor emotion overwhelms financial concentration. While one could justify the present yield curve/volatility dynamic as a manifestation of the Fed’s efforts at “guidance,” I would retort that while it may be possible to land a jumbo jet onto a football field, it is still highly unlikely.?

While we can debate when the journey to the terminal federal funds rate will begin, what may be more certain is that the divergence between the yield curve and implied volatility will dissolve. Markets may appear confounded by cognitive dissonance, but forward-looking investors can peer through the fog: A return to a more recognizable risk/return profile, even if market returns are lower overall (as may well be the case over the secular horizon), could help investors more confidently align longer-term objectives with strategies.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/12cwdtf Tyler Durden

When Is A White House Transcript Not A Transcript?

From the “most transparent and open administration ever”

*  *  *

President Obama’s unpaid bills have gone missing, as ABC reports:

What Obama said on a rare trip to Chicago:

“Because Michelle and I and the kids, we left so quickly that there’s still junk on my desk, including some unpaid bills,” he joked. “I think eventually they got paid–but they’re sort of stacked up. And messages, newspapers and all kinds of stuff.”

What The White House transcript said he said:

we left so quickly that there’s still junk on my desk, including some–newspapers and all kinds of stuff.”

According to the White House, the omission was unintentional and the result of problem with the audio recording.

*  *  *

And we are sure there is no one that is responsible or aware of it. Of course, the propogandists seem to think it would not play well for “folks” to think Obama is late paying his bills…




via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/aZ_gszJZJwA/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Wall Street Is One Sick Puppy – Thanks To Even Sicker Central Banks

Submitted by David Stockman via Contra Corner blog,

Last Wednesday the markets plunged on a vague recognition that the central bank promoted recovery story might not be on the level. But that tremor didn’t last long.

Right on cue the next day, one of the very dimmest Fed heads—James Dullard of St Louis—-mumbled incoherently about a possible QE extension, causing the robo-traders to erupt with buy orders. By the end of the day Friday, with the market off just 5% from its all-time highs, the buy-the-dips crowd was back, proclaiming that the “bottom is in”. This week the market has been energetically retracing what remains of the October correction.

And its no different anywhere else in the central bank besotted financial markets around the world. Everywhere state action, not business enterprise, is believed to be the source of wealth creation—at least the stock market’s paper wealth version and even if for just a few more hours or days.

Thus, several nights ago Japan’s stock market ripped 4% higher in the blink of an eye after the robo-traders scanned a headline suggesting that Japan’s already bankrupt government would start buying even more equities for its pension plan. And that comes on top of the massive ETF and equity purchases already being made by the BOJ.

Likewise, yesterday morning the European bourses soared on a self-evident trial balloon enabled by Reuters that the ECB might start buying corporate bonds—in addition to asset-backed commercial paper, covered mortgage bonds and targeted loan advances to commercial banks. Moreover, all this prospective asset buying with freshly minted ECB credit was supposedly a prelude to outright QE—-that is, adding sovereign debt to the ECB’s already bloated balance sheet.

The thing is, however, the last injection is never enough in today’s stimulus addicted casinos. In the case of the ECB, the market’s pandering for more monetary stimulus is especially disingenuous. The pot-bangers claim, of course, that the ECB’s current balance sheet inflation plan is just retracing old ground;  and that it simply needs to fill a $1.2 trillion “hole” to get its balance sheet back to where it was in mid-2012 when Draghi’s “whatever it takes” ukase was delivered to Europe’s roiled bond and equity markets.

Let’s see. In just the eight year period leading up the crisis of 2012, the ECB’s balance sheet had exploded by 4X. And the the truth of the matter is that the subsequent shrinkage shown below is a dangerous  pro forma illusion. The ECB’s bloated portfolio of discount loans to member banks which were collateralized by sovereign debt was not really liquidated; it has just slithered to an off-balance sheet parking lot for the interim.

What Draghi’s undeliverable pledge actually did was to incite the fast money crowd into frenetic peripheral bond buying on the usual front-running presumption that smart guys buy now what the central banks announce they will be buying later. Soon the prices of these sovereign junk credits were ripping higher, and the rest of the market piled on—- especially the very same Spanish and Italian banks which had previously retreated to the ECB discount window to fund their stranded books of own country bonds.

Stated differently, in return for three cheap words Mario Draghi was able to access  a  vast financial parking lot, which was quickly filled with the previously shunned peripheral nation bonds. Accordingly, European banks, especially in Italy and Spain, began to liquidate their LTRO borrowings and, presto, the ECB’s reported balance sheet shrunk drastically.

quick view chart

In truth, however, Draghi’s parking lot is inhabited by an assemblage of day traders who can make a bee-line for the exits as fast as they piled-on to the original “whatever it takes” trade. In fact, Draghi’s desperate jawboning and serial announcements about balance sheet expansion ploys are proof positive that the parking lot has a tenuous hold on its tenants.

That means that virtually any unexpected catalyst could start a run on the  trillions of Greek, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and Irish debt that is now insanely over-valued.  Accordingly, the European bond market is a massive conflagration waiting for an ignition. Worse still, Germany now has all the matches, and it is becoming more evident by the day that its politicians and financial statesman have finally drawn a line in the sand. There will be no outright QE, and, therefore, there is no way to keep Mario’s parking lot from experiencing an eventual stampede for the exist gates.

In that context, today Reuter’s leak was just a probe—-an attempt by the ECB apparatchiks to see whether the German resolve against “state financing” extends to corporate debt as well as outright government bonds. That this desperate ploy elicited an excited equity rally is just a measure of how sick stock markets all around the world have become.

Yet today’s headline was probably worth no more than a one-day rip, and that’s all the casino cares about. It does not discount the future of the real world economy; it only chases the concurrent emissions of central banks liquidity and word clouds.

Indeed, if the European bourse were actually discounting the real world future they would have panicked long ago. And not just because Europe is heading for a triple dip or because the German export machine is faltering owing to the swoon in its heretofore bloated and unsustainable export markets in Russian and China.

In fact, Europe is stuck in a deep rut of socialist tax and debt burdens, economic dirigisme and excessive financialization, and has been so for most of this century. Here is what has happened to the euro area economy while the ECB printing presses were running red hot.  As shown in the first panel below, total industrial production (less construction) in mid-2014 is no higher than it was 14 years ago.

quick view chart

Likewise, the euro area has had no net employment gains since 2006. Accordingly, the unemployment rate for the EU-18 as a whole had soared, notwithstanding sharp improvement in Germany and northern Europe.

 

At the same time that the private  sector has been stagnant, the public debt has continued to soar, and is now 50% higher than the already bloated levels of 2008. Moreover, with a triple dip all but certain, and virtually no growth in nominal GDP in any event, there is virtually no chance that the aggregate debt of the euro-zone nations will not soon catapult past 100% of GDP. In that context, it is plainly evident that the real agenda of the Brussels  bureaucrats and the Draghi gang in Frankfurt is to monetize the public debt, not ignite a miracle of private economic growth and rising corporate profits.

quick view chart

 

On this side of the pond, the equity market puppy is just a sick. Consider the actual gibberish uttered by Bullard last Thursday:

I also think that inflation expectations are dropping in the US. And that is something that a central bank cannot abide. We have to make sure that inflation and inflation expectations remain near our target.

 

And for that reason I think a reasonable response of the Fed in this situation would be to invoke the clause on the taper that said that the taper was data dependent. And we could go on pause on the taper at this juncture and wait until we see how the data shakes out into December…..So… continue with QE at a very low level as we have it right now. And then assess our options going forward.”

The underscored sentence says it all. Bullard has been drinking the central bank cool-aid so long that he does not even recognize that the “inflation expectations” which he cites as reason for more Fed money printing are actually authored by the FOMC itself. The chart below represents the so-called 5-year breakeven—-which is the subtraction of the inflation protected TIPS bond yield for that period from the regular treasury note. That is, its represents nothing more than trading noise—- the random differences between treasury securities being massive impacted and manipulated by the central banks and the carry trade gamblers that they enable.

So Bullard espied a wiggle in the graph below, and declared it an intolerable breach of the central banks plan for just the right amount of inflation—-that is, 2%, no more and no less. Accordingly, more bond buying was warranted.  Never mind that the Fed has pinned the money market rate at zero for 71 months and unleashed the greatest carry trade gambling spree in recorded history; or that $3.5 trillion of debt monetization during that period has deeply deformed yields and pricing in the entire fixed income market.

chart-I-5-year inflation breakevens

 

No, the job of the monetary politburo is apparently to sift noise out of the in-coming data noise—-even when it is a feedback loop from the Fed’s own manipulation and interventions. So the stock market rallies strenuously because an incoherent central banker starts randomly gumming about self-evident financial noise.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1tc3BvE Tyler Durden

Someone Didn’t Do The Math On The ECB’s Corporate Bond Purchasing “Trial Balloon”

While we understand that following the biggest market rout in years, it was all up to the central bankers to do everything in their power to restore confidence in the market’s upward trajectory in a time when there are only 2 POMOs left under the Fed’s soon ending QE3 program, which explains not only last week’s 2 QE4 hints by FOMC presidents but also yesterday’s ECB “leak” via Reuters that the central bank is contemplating launching corporate bond buying as soon as December. A leak which sent the market soaring to its best day of 2014. And while we give the European central bankers an A for effort, we can’t help but wonder if someone did a major mathematical error when calculating the “bazooka impact” of yesterday’s leak.

The reason: the same one we have cautioned about ever since 2012; the same why as we also explained in August the ECB’s ABS QE will be grossly sufficient: Europe simply does not have enough eligible, unencumbered collateral in the private sector which can be monetized by the central bank (the same issue that the Fed itself was forced to taper QE once its holdings of 10 Year equivalents hit 35% as we showed last year and the TBAC started warning about gross bond market illiquidity). This goes back to a different issue, namely that Europe historically has funded itself on a secured basis, where the loans are kept on bank balance sheets (and serve as deposit collateral) unlike the US, where the primary source of corporate debt is through unsecured borrowing directly from lenders. We have shown all this before:

Our summary from March 2012 was as follows:

What is immediately obvious here, is that unlike in the US, where these are less than 30% for corporates, in Europe, bank loans account for nearly a whopping 90% of total corporate funding! These are secured, LTV loans, made by banks, and not syndicated, which means they are kept on the banks’ balance sheets. As a result the bulk of Europe’s assets held by levered entities, are already encumbered through existing security arrangement in the debt market (recall that bond debt is for the most part unsecured, and is thus a junior piece to secured bank loans). It also explains why European banks have to scramble to find new assets which they can “pledge” to the ECB in exchange for some additional cash to plug this liquidity shortfall hole, or that.

And because we understand that few have actually done any math behind the ECB’s leak, here it is:

According to Barclays, based on the iBoxx Euro Corporate Index, there is €495bn in par value of unsecured, senior non-financial debt outstanding from euro area issuers (Market Value €563bn).

In addition there is €271bn in par value of unsecured, senior financial debt from euro area issuers outstanding (Market Value €300bn). The rating and tenor breakdown of the outstanding universe of bonds is shown below.

According to Barclays the reason why nobody else appears to have done the math, is because the ECB itself screwed up the numbers:

We note that these numbers are significantly different from the numbers reported by the ECB. The central bank reports €1.4trn of marketable corporate bonds and €2.2trn of uncovered bank bonds as eligible collateral at its operations. However, this includes MTNs, CP and guaranteed bonds. Starting from the ECB’s collateral list, instead of a broad-based index, we estimate the stock of corporate bonds at €177bn of non-financials and €321bn of financial debt (excluding Landesbank). This is much smaller than the “headline” figure, but also materially different from our index-based estimate, on the non-financial side.

Barclays’ conclusion on the stock of eligible monetizable corporate debt: “Overall, we estimate the upper-bounds of potential bonds that might be in “scope” for an ECB purchase programme at €560bn of non-financial and €320bn of financial bonds (taking the iBoxx and ECB derived estimates, respectively). This falls to €240bn and €220bn if BBB-rated bonds are excluded.

It doesn’t get any better when one looks at recent trends in net issuance to determine which way the collateral will move in coming quarters and years:

net issuance from financials has been negative in the senior unsecured €-IG space for the past four years, while net issuance from non-financials has been positive. Ex. Subordinated transactions, the average monthly net flow over the past two years has been: +€5bn from non-financials; and -€10bn from non-financials

In chart format:

Ok, so there is roughly about €750 billion in eligible (non-fin and fin, even though the ECB will almost certainly just do the former) bonds that can be bought? Why is that a problem: can’t the ECB just go out and buy them all in one massive BWIC in its holy quest to boost its balance sheet by €1 trillion (apparently the magic number that will get those record youth unemployed in Spain back in jobs).

Well no. Here is JPM with the missing link which has to do with market liquidity and how much the ECB would actually be able to buy without soaking up all bond market liquidity:

It is unlikely that the ECB would buy subordinated bonds as these are not even eligible as collateral in its refinancing operations. That leaves €750 billion of nonfinancial corporate bonds that the ECB may consider buying, around €500bn of which is issued by European corporates. Market turnover may currently be around 2.5% of outstanding (after correcting for double-counting in the turnover data) and the ECB may be able to purchase 10-20% of this turnover. In addition, the ECB could also go into the primary market, buying 10% of new deals (from a total gross issuance of almost €20 billion per month recently). Such considerations suggest that, as a rough guide, they could purchase around €50 billion over a one year period under current market conditions, and perhaps as high as €100 billion if purchases improve market conditions, raising turnover.

So… the entire mega ramp yesterday was over an ECB monetization leak that boils down to a whopping €50 billion ($60 per year) or a tiny $5 billion per month, which is $15 billion per quarter?

Keep in mind at its peak in 2013 the Fed monetized $85 billion per month, while the BOJ added another $75 billion or so in its QE. So as the Fed is about to completely pull out of the “flow injection” market (even as the BOJ still pushes on with its existing remit which as a result of soaring non-wage inflation will certainly not increase any time soon) it will be replaced by $10 billion or so in ABC/Covered bond purchases and another $5 billion per month in corporate bonds?

And this is the best Hail Mary pass that the central planners could come up with?

All of this is critical because as Citi explained over the weekend, in order to keep the market from crashing, central banks need to inject at least $200 billion per quarter:

For over a year now, central banks have quietly being reducing their support. As Figure 7 shows, much of this is down to the Fed, but the contraction in the ECB’s balance sheet has also been significant. Seen from this perspective, a negative reaction in markets was long overdue: very roughly, the charts suggest that zero stimulus would be consistent with 50bp widening in investment grade, or a little over a ten percent quarterly drop in equities. Put differently, it takes around $200bn per quarter just to keep markets from selling off.

In other words, the “mega-leak” from the ECB will hardly scratch the surface in terms of the required liquidity injections, and certainly will be insufficient if at some point in the coming year, the BOJ finds it too has run out of collateral and is forced to wind down its own QE.

So after actually doing the math we wonder: how long before the market realizes Draghi’s latest bazooka was another water pistol, and how long until Reuters is forced to go with the nuclear leak – that the ECB is now considering monetizing ETFs and, gasp, stocks.

Because that, ladies and gentlemen, is the endgame here.




via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/CPeFmnxoETM/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Saxobank CIO Warns “Another Shock Drop Is Coming.. And It’s Coming Soon”

Saxo Bank's Chief Economist Steen Jakobsen is predicting another 'shock drop' in the markets within a few weeks. With debt and low inflation continuing to create a nervous atmosphere behind most markets, Steen argues that we will hit fresh lows in mid-November. Steen takes the view that central bank policy is creating a 'fantasy land' for investors and he points out that the recent 'day dive' in markets was a closer reflection of reality. Steen outlines his suggestions for trading ahead of another dip in mid November with targets for the S&P 500 around 1810 and the Dax at 8000 – 7800. Be long fixed income as it is "a free put on the equity market.. and the economic cycle is not yet ready to adapt to a rising interest rate."

 

 

 

Source: TradingFloor




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1sPnaav Tyler Durden

Tennessee Woman Sentenced To Jail For Not Mowing Her Lawn

Submitted by Mike Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

The trend of average U.S. citizens being incarcerated by overzealous judges and prosecutors within the police state formerly known as America continues with reckless abandon. In fact, these sorts of cases are becoming so commonplace I simply cannot keep up with all of them. The following story is a perfect followup to my piece earlier today, which shows how American public school students are being arrested or harassed by police for the most minor of infractions, such as wearing too much perfume, sharing a classmates’ chicken nuggets, throwing an eraser or chewing gum.

If you are an adult American slave, you can add not mowing your lawn to the list of prison-worthy crimes in the police state.

 

From Yahoo News:

If you are a resident of Lenoir City, Tennessee, you might want to remember to mow your lawn — otherwise, you will be spending the night in jail.

 

Karen Holloway just spent six hours in a jail cell for failing to maintain her yard in accordance with the standards set by the city.

 

The saga began last summer, when Holloway was sent a citation for her overgrown grass and shrubbery. Holloway, who works a full-time job and has two children living at home, a husband in school, and one family vehicle, admits the yard needed some attention but that it just wasn’t feasible to do the work.

“The bushes and trees were overgrown. But that’s certainly not a criminal offense,” she says.

 

Last week, Judge Terry Vann handed down a five-day jail sentence to Holloway for refusing to comply with the city ordinances regarding yard maintenance, specifically the lack thereof. Holloway feels this was all just too much, saying, “It’s not right. Why would you put me in jail with child molesters and people who’ve done real crimes, because I haven’t maintained my yard.”

 

In addition to the severity of the sentencing, Holloway say she also feels that she was bullied during the process because she was never read her rights or told that she could have a lawyer present.

And you wonder why so many Americans feel the country is on the wrong track. As the Wall Street Journal noted yesterday:

The only time the public has felt worse was in October 2008, during the first, deep spasms of the recession. Then, 78% said the nation was on the wrong track, and only 12% felt good about the country’s direction. The last time “right direction” beat out “wrong track” was in January 2004 — and the last election cycle where that was the case was 2002.

For related storied about serfs being arrested for minor incidents, while the rich and powerful get away with enormous criminality, see:

Connecticut Man Arrested for “Passive Aggressive” Behavior to a Watermelon

New Jersey Threatens to Take 13-Year-Old Student From His Father Due to “Non-Conforming Behavior”

Hyper-Sensitive Illinois Mayor Orders Police Raid Over Parody Twitter Account

Charleston Man Receives $525 Federal Fine for Failing to Pay for a $0.89 Refill

The “War on Street Artists” – Puppeteer Unlawfully Arrested and Harassed in NYC Subway

Video of the Day – Thuggish Militarized Police Terrorize and SWAT Team Iowa Family




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1tbU0oC Tyler Durden

India Gold Demand Surges 450% and Bank of Russia Demand At 15 Year High

India Gold Demand Surges 450% and Bank of Russia Demand At 15 Year High

Demand for gold continues to be robust and has indeed increased significantly in recent weeks despite gold’s most recent paper driven gold weakness.

Demand in China and India surged again and gold reserve diversification by the central bank of Russia hit a new record high in September as geopolitical tensions rose. 

The seemingly insatiable appetite of the growing Indian middle class for gold is causing the government in India to again consider imposing sanctions on the importing of gold. 

Gold imports into India in September were worth $3.8 billion. This figure is almost double the $2 billion spent by Indians in August as, once again, the Indian middle class, like their Chinese counterparts, used the opportunity of a weakened gold price to increase their holdings. This was particularly the case in recent weeks and in the run up to the Diwali festival which began yesterday with Dhanteras. 

To put this figure in context it is worth noting that in August 2013 gold imports were valued at just $739 million.

Indian gold imports were up 449.7% y/y in September, which is approximately 94 tonnes, using the average gold price for September.

From the point of view of the government in India, this level of demand for the precious metal, which must be imported, is an unwelcome development. “The trade deficit worsened to an 18-month high of $14 billion in September following a 450% rise in gold imports as importers rushed to take advantage of lower prices” reports India’s Economic Times.

The government in India claims that this staggering level of demand is causing a weakening of the rupee which undermines India’s ability to import the other commodities upon which it depends. 

Exactly how the Indian government intend to deal with the problem is unclear. The previous attempt to control gold imports in 2013 was aborted due to it’s deep unpopularity and to the fact that vast quantities continued to be smuggled into India regardless, resulting in loss of revenue to the state.
In China, gold imports have surged again. 

In the world’s largest gold buyer China, premiums recovered to $2-$3 an ounce from $1-$2 overnight, showing higher demand and lending support to global prices. Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) gold withdrawals were very high this week and saw a huge rise for the week to 68.4 tonnes with most of the buying after their Golden Week holiday.

Last year alone, China imported almost 2,000 tonnes of gold as seen in the important metric that is withdrawals from the SGE.  To put that figure in context, global mining supply will be around 2,700 tonnes this year.

What we in the West need to appreciate is that – in the case of both India and China, where around one third of the population of the Earth reside, – it is masses of individuals, families and local businesses who are driving this demand.

It is being driven particularly by the burgeoning middle classes who are accumulating whatever gold they can with their disposable income. The desire to own gold as savings and financial security is culturally embedded in these ancient cultures. 

Asians experience of fiat, paper currencies has not been a good one.

As such, the demand is not speculative and a cyclical, short term blip. Rather, it would appear to be a long term, structural shift to higher demand. While the trend may dissipate it is very unlikely to reverse into a trend of mass selling and it is unlikely to reverse trend anytime soon given the fiscal and monetary challenges facing the Western and indeed the Eastern world.
Apart from massive store of wealth demand in the East, the gold reserve demand by many large, creditor nation central banks continues unabated. 

In Russia, the central bank added a very large 37.3 tonnes of the metal to it’s reserves in September – it’s largest purchase in fifteen years. 

It is an indication of the strategic importance that Vladimir Putin and his government place on gold that such a large amount was purchased at this time of international tensions. 

The rouble has been under tremendous pressure due to Western imposed sanctions and the slump in oil prices – Russia’s largest revenue source. According to the Russian Central Bank: “In the past ten days we have sold about $6 billion” to support the rouble rate, Reuters reported yesterday. And yet $1.5 billion was made available to acquire gold reserves. 

Asian people are acting like their own central bank and diversifying their wealth. 

It is safe to say that – in the event of a global monetary crisis brought on by a tsunami of insurmountable QE compounded debt – the average Indian or Chinese family will be reasonably well equipped to weather the financial and monetary storm. 

The same cannot be said, unfortunately, for their Western counterparts where ownership of tangible assets is abysmally low and only a tiny fraction of the population own gold and silver bullion.

Get Breaking News and Updates on the Gold Market Here 

GOLDCORE MARKET UPDATE
Today’s AM fix was USD 1,246.75, EUR 982.08 and GBP 777.66 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD  1,251.75, EUR 978.85 and GBP 774.17 per ounce.
    
Gold climbed $2.20 or 0.18% to $1,248.30 per ounce and silver rose $0.07 or 0.4% to $17.51 per ounce yesterday. 


Silver in U.S. Dollars – 10 Years (Thomson Reuters)

Gold in Swiss storage or for immediate delivery lost 0.2% to $1,246.08 an ounce by 1200 in Zurich.
Silver for immediate delivery lost 0.7% to $17.43 an ounce. Platinum fell 0.5% to $1,276 an ounce. Palladium was 0.4% lower at $776 an ounce.

Gold retreated from the highest in almost six weeks in dollar terms due to profit taking and renewed risk appetite which saw stocks globally bounce from their recent lows although european shares are showing weakness again this morning. Although gold continues to eke out small gains in euro, pound and other fiat currency terms.

Gold reached $1,255.34 an ounce yesterday, the highest since September 10. Demand in India, the second biggest gold buyer, surged before the Diwali festival, Indian’s Christmas.

Diwali, the festival of lights is celebrated tomorrow and Dhanteras, the biggest gold buying festival, was celebrated yesterday. Dhanteras is considered an auspicious time to buy gold coins, bars and jewellery. Researcher CPM Group estimates the holiday generates about 20% of India’s annual purchases.


Platinum in U.S. Dollars – 10 Years (Thomson Reuters)

Gold has risen 3.2% so far in October as stocks fell sharply and traders pushed back estimates for when the Federal Reserve might raise U.S. interest rates from near 0%. The IMF has cut its economic growth outlook this month and Fed policy makers said slowing foreign economies were a risk to U.S. expansion. Indeed, the U.S. economy itself looks very vulnerable to a recession. 

The Shanghai Gold Exchange is working to implement China’s first forwards and options in gold, in a race to put China as the main Asian pricing benchmark that could rival the London gold fix. 

The European Central Bank is planning to buy corporate bonds on the secondary market and may decide as soon as December with a view to begin purchases in early 2015. This is another sign of desperation on the part of central bankers who are attempting to kick start the structurally broken Eurozone economy.

A diversified portfolio of precious metal coins and bars, owned in a segregated and allocated manner in the safest jurisdictions in the world remains very prudent.

See Essential Guide to Storing Gold In Switzerland here.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ykL0wG GoldCore

The Fed’s Hands Are Tied Unless the Market Crashes

The markets have a major problem.

That problem, simply put, is that QE ends this month.

 

QE has been the driving force for the stock market since 2008. This factor, more than anything else in the world, is responsible for stocks rallying to new all-time highs surpassing even the 2007 peak.

 

To be clear QE 1 and QE 2 were widely accepted in the business community because of their context: QE 1 was a reaction to the 2008 meltdown, with QE 2 considered to be needed because QE 1 didn’t quite “get the job done.”

 

However, QE 3 and QE 4 were both game changers. The first two QE programs had fixed deadlines which emphasized notion that eventually the Fed would end its QE efforts and risk would be permitted to move back to more market-based levels.

 

However, this all changed in the period from September 2012- December 2012 when the Fed announced QE 3 and QE 4: two “open-ended” programs without fixed deadlines.

 

The message was now clear: risk would be mispriced ad infinitum until something breaks.

 

It is not coincidental that the market staged its largest, most bubblish move during these programs.

 

 

Which brings us to today. QE 3 and QE 4 are ending in a little over a week. And the Fed has made it clear than a stock market correction will not goad it into engaging another QE program anytime soon.

 

Indeed, in many ways the Fed’s hands are tied. Politically it is becoming more and more evident that the Fed will be blamed for the US economy (note the recent emphasis on income inequality in Fed speeches). Having just engaged in QE for TWO SOLID YEARS STRAIGHT the Fed would totally destroy any and all credibility in its monetary policies to engage in QE anytime within the next three to six months.

 

Which means… the markets are losing their most critical prop: the Fed’s money pumps. Sure, verbal interventions will trigger short-covering rallies like the one we’ve seen in the last week… but the money won’t be coming…

 

Prepare now, the next round of the crisis beckons.

 

If you’ve yet to take action to prepare for the second round of the financial crisis, we offer a FREE investment report Financial Crisis "Round Two" Survival Guide that outlines easy, simple to follow strategies you can use to not only protect your portfolio from a market downturn, but actually produce profits.

You can pick up a FREE copy at:

http://ift.tt/1rPiWR3

Best Regards

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1DAzuzX Phoenix Capital Research