The Health Insurance Scam – “Coverage” Doesn’t Mean Affordability or Access

Screen Shot 2016-03-23 at 11.58.21 AM

An architect of the federal healthcare law said last year that a “lack of transparency” and the “stupidity of the American voter” helped Congress approve ObamaCare.

He suggested that many lawmakers and voters didn’t know what was in the law or how its financing worked, and that this helped it win approval. 

– From the post: Video of the Day – Obamacare Architect Credits “Lack of Transparency” and “Stupidity of the American People” for Passage of Healthcare Law

Politicians, particularly those of the Democratic persuasion, love to throw around statistics about how many additional people have health coverage without ever talking about the cost of such coverage, or whether it actually translates into actual access in the real world.

While a greater number of Americans having healthcare insurance is an accomplishment when it comes to protecting against unexpected catastrophic events or extended hospital stays, it doesn’t tell you anything about two very important variables: 1) How much does it cost? 2) What kind of access does it provide? As usual, the devil is in the details.

We’ve all seen headlines about the cost of monthly premiums rising, in some cases by dramatic amounts, but that’s just the tip of iceberg. Once you’ve paid your premium, you’re far from off the hook. Another one-two punch of deductibles, copays and out of pocket maximums appear which can collectively run into the thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars for families. Meanwhile, it appears insurance companies may have recognized the politically toxic nature of higher premiums, so it seems focus has turned to deductibles as the most efficient way to suck more money from the public for no comparable increase in service.

As the Daily Caller reported earlier this month:

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1XND5UF
via IFTTT

Possessing Air Pellet Gun During Film Shoot Can Get You Many Years in Prison in Jersey

New Jersey is a terrible place to try to own or use a gun. Or even to have one on your person in a public place while shooting a movie. Even if it’s an air powered pellet gun.

This is a lesson learned by Carlo Bellario, who was caught holding a CO2 air pellet gun while portraying a bodyguard for a drug dealer while filming a small indie flick called Vendetta Games.

The 48-year-old Bellario is bravely, if possibly foolishly, not willing to plea out to any punishment for “weapons possession” for this objectively innocent act no matter the letter of that crazy state’s crazy gun laws, reports NJ.com. 

He could have plead out for three years in prison, but is opting for trial instead. (He’s got a GoFundMe going for his court costs.)

This is especially risky as he could end up with an additional ten years tacked on because of certain prior convictions the actor and comedian has on his record, including credit card theft and burglary.

The gun was, according to previous NJ.com reports from before Bellario was officially indicted for his “crime,” was a CO2 air pellet gun, which is treated like any other firearm under Jersey law. He did not fire it, merely had it in his waistband. Neighbors disturbed or alarmed by the unpermitted film shoot called the cops, who showed up and arrested him for possessing the weapon.

Superior Court Judge Alberto Rivas sternly warned Bellario that:

“you know what’s at stake here. You’re going for the long haul. You lose, (and) you’ll end up in state prison — for an extended period of time. Especially if you have a record. Flat time, three years, you’re out in less than a year — (and) you may be eligible for intensive supervision.”….

“You could be out in six months,” Rivas said alluringly. “And that’s what you are potentially rejecting today. But, it’s your call. It’s your decision. You’re the one who has to live with all the consequences for your decision.”

He continued, “He get’s to go home, he get’s to go home; you’re the only one who doesn’t know if he gets to go home. You can live with that?”

Bellario insists he thought the gun was just a prop gun, not real, and that the film director had a permit for it. Since he considers his behavior perfectly innocent, he was not inclined to just give up and put himself behind bars for it.

State Assemblyman Jon Bramnick (R-Union) told the paper that “Common sense dictates that this guy should not be facing prison.” Brannick would like to get a state law passed that would “give prosecutors more discretion with gun charges if it were determined that there was a lack of criminal intent.”

From November 2014 the saga of Brian Aitken, another innocent man falling afoul of Jersey’s insane gun laws.

And a vast collection of Reason stories of New Jersey gun law enforcement.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1U9DGlm
via IFTTT

Explosive Accusation: Belgium Had “Advance And Precise” Warning About Airport And Subway Bombings, Did Nothing

In what, if true, is the most incendiary allegation of the day, Israel’s Haaretz newspaper reports that Belgian security services and other Western intelligence agencies had “advance and precise intelligence warnings” regarding Tuesday’s bombings. According to the paper, “the security services knew, with a high degree of certainty, that attacks were planned in the very near future for the airport and, apparently, for the underground railway as well.”

Here is the full Haaretz report:

The Belgian security services, as well as other Western intelligence agencies, had advance and precise intelligence warnings regarding the terrorist attacks in Belgium on Tuesday, Haaretz has learned.

 

The security services knew, with a high degree of certainty, that attacks were planned in the very near future for the airport and, apparently, for the subway as well.

 

Despite the advance warning, the intelligence and security preparedness in Brussels, where most of the European Union agencies are located, was limited in its scope and insufficient for the severity and immediacy of the alert.

 

As far as is known, the attacks were planned by the headquarters of the Islamic State (ISIS) in Raqqa, Syria, which it has pronounced as the capital of its Islamic caliphate.

 

The terror cell responsible for the attacks in Brussels on Tuesday was closely associated with the network behind the series of attacks in Paris last November. At this stage, it appears that both were part of the same terrorist infrastructure, connected at the top by the terrorist Salah Abdeslam, who was involved in both the preparation for the Paris attacks and its implementation.

 

Abdeslam escaped from Paris after the November attacks, hid out in Brussels and was arrested last week by the Belgian authorities.

 

Abdeslam’s arrest was apparently the trigger for Tuesday’s attacks, due to the concern in ISIS that he might give information about the planned attacks under interrogation, particularly in the light of reports that he was cooperating with his captors.

 

The testimony of the detained terrorist, alongside other intelligence information, part of which concerned ISIS operations in Syria, should have resulted in much more stringent security preparedness in crowded public places in Brussels, along with a heightened search for the cell.

If this report is accurate, it leads to many unpleasant and frankly disturbing questions for both local as well as international authorities, like why in the aftermath of the Salah Abdeslam capture did Belgium not at least issue a heightened state of alert as it did in November in the aftermath of the Paris bombings, when overnight Brussels looked like an army ghost town; at least it was safe. Recall from our November report of how Brussels looks like a warzone after the Paris terrorist attack:

 

This time, however, the local police did nothing and the result was over 30 deaths and hundreds of injuries.

What’s worse as of this moment the third suspect remain at large: as Haaretz reminds us, “the search is focused on the terrorist Najim Laachraoui, who created the explosive vests used by the bombers and escaped from the airport at the last moment.”

There is concern, however, that other cells connected to ISIS in Western Europe will attempt to carry out additional attacks in the near future, either in Belgium or in other countries involved in the war against the terror organization in Syria and Iraq.

How Europe will handle the ongoing deadly fallout from the bursting of this one terrorist cell, will be closely watched, and should Tuesday’s event recur when local authorities had been warned about an upcoming terrorist attack leading to no specific action, perhaps some will finally ask if the local governments were at least partially complicit in the deaths of dozens of innocent people, for motives first hinted at in that infamous 2008 AIG Banque presentation which has so far predicted with absolute accuracy the future of the Eurozone.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1VFBXUw Tyler Durden

Assault Charges for Pregnant Drug Users Set to Stop in Tennessee

A controversial Tennessee law criminalizing mothers of newborns who test positive for narcotics is set to expire this summer, after lawmakers failed to re-authorize the law this week. Under the measure, passed in 2014, Tennessee women can be charged with assault—punishable by up to 15 years in prison—for giving birth to an infant “addicted to or harmed by” a narcotic drug. 

The law is controversial because no one wants to condone drug use by pregant women. But opponents of the law—including the American Medical Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, and those of us who covered it here at Reason—argue that criminalization isn’t the answer, as threatening drug-dependent women with jail only discourages them from seeking things like prenatal care and addiction treatment, or from giving birth in hospitals. 

What’s more, laws like this aren’t just used against those who actually cause their babies harm (despite the statutory language). In July 2014, the first woman to be charged under the new law, Mallory Loyola, was arrested after her newborn tested positive for methamphetamine. But the baby was born healthy, and according to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, there “is no syndrome or disorder that can specifically be identified for babies who were exposed in utero to methamphetamine.” Meanwhile, alcohol poses a great risk to fetuses, at least when consumed excess of a certain amount. Yet, as Jacob Sullum noted, “while an expectant mother who drinks a glass of wine in public might attract glares from busybodies, she probably will not attract attention from the police.” 

The charges against Loyola were eventually dropped after she completed a rehab program. But many more women have been arrested since her—around 100, according to the Knoxville News Sentinel.

Meanwhile, the number of Tennessee newborns who test positive for narcotics has, at least at some hospitals, only increased. And at places such as the University of Tennessee Medical Center, the incidence of deliveries outside the hospital has almost doubled, staff say. 

The Tennessee fetal assault law will expire July 1, 2016, if no further action is taken by state legislators. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1q2yYti
via IFTTT

“The Greatest Crash Of Your Life Is Just Ahead…” – Harry Dent Warns

“The Greatest Crash Of Your Life Is Just Ahead…” – Harry Dent Warns

Harry Dent, best-selling author and economist, has warned that the stock bubble in the U.S. today is the biggest in history and that the “greatest crash of your life is just ahead…”

Writing on his website EconomyandMarkets.com, Dent warned that

The story on Wall Street and CNBC continues to be that we’re in a correction and this is a buying opportunity. Even Warren Buffett joins the chorus of stock market cheerleaders for the skeptical public. Well, I agree with the skeptical public, not the experts here!

 

The bull market from early 2009 into May 2015 looks just like every bubble in history, and I’m getting one sign after the next that we did indeed peak last May.

I’ve been telling our Boom & Bust subscribers for months now that the dominant pattern in the stock is the “rounded top” pattern I show in the chart below:

SP-500-rounded-top-768x578

After trading in a steep, bubble-like channel from late 2011 into late 2014, with only 10% maximum volatility top to bottom, the market finally lost its momentum… just as the Fed finished tapering its QE. That’s because the Fed was the primary driver in this stock bubble in the first place!

But the first sign that the bubble had indeed peaked was the break of that upward channel last August. Surprise, surprise! Without the Fed’s stimulus, stocks started to sputter out!

With that sign we can point to what now looks like a series of major tops, in one major index after the next, since late 2014.

Dow Transports, November 2014. Dow Utilities, January 2015. The DAX in Germany and the FTSE in the UK: April, 2015. The Dow and S&P 500, May 2015. The Shanghai Composite in June 2015. The Nasdaq, Biotech and the Russell 2000: July 2015. And finally, the Nikkei Index in Japan that peaked in August 2015.

The Shanghai Index crashed 45% in 2.5 months, similar to the Dow in late 1929 on its first 2.5 month wave down. That one was so obvious that when I said it was about to burst, it peaked that day and rolled over the next!

Read full article here

Dent is a successful newsletter writer and has written numerous best selling books over the years, most recently ‘Spending Waves: The Scientific Key To Predicting Market Behavior for the Next 20 Years’ and ‘The Demographic Cliff – How to Survive and Prosper During the Great Deflation of 2014–2019? – detailing why we’re facing a “great deflation” after five years of stimulus — and what to do about it now.

With stock market valuations in the U.S. in particular looking stretched and U.S. stocks looking very overvalued, we agree with Dent that there is indeed a real risk of a material correction in stock markets as there was in 2000 and in 2007. In presentations to clients we have looked at and explained why we view these markets as over valued and having all the hallmarks of bubbles about to burst.

Given the risk of a new global financial crisis and the backdrop of a massively leveraged global financial system which has seen debt increase another $57 trillion in just 8 years, it would be foolhardy to dismiss Dent’s bearish prediction. Most economists, brokers, advisers and politicians would be likely to do – as they did regarding warnings we made in the 2005 to 2008 period, prior to the first global financial crisis.

Ultimately, none of us have a crystal ball and it is best to focus on what we control and always follow the three rules of investing: diversification, diversification and diversification.

Portfolios with very overweight allocations to equities and bonds are now at risk and there is a strong case for increasing allocations to cash and gold. Careful consideration should be given to who you deposit your money with and store your gold with. Counter party risk and the return of capital rather than the return on capital will assume importance once again in the coming years.

It is worth pointing out that while Harry Dent believes gold prices will fall initially in the coming deflationary spiral – perhaps as low as $700 per ounce – he clearly advises having an allocation to gold as a form of financial insurance:

“Investors might want to keep a little ‘insurance’ gold for diversification.”

Gold prices may indeed fall in the short term however as was the case in the near financial and economic deflationary collapse in 2008, we believe that gold will outperform other assets and should rise in value in the medium term and taking a view on an annual or multi year basis.

Dent’s view that gold will fall to $700 per ounce appears to be based primarily on technical analysis. It ignores the important global supply and demand fundamentals in the international gold market. The above ground, refined, investment grade, physical gold market remains a very small market vis a vis stock, bond, property, cash and derivative markets. Even a small amount of extra demand for physical bullion internationally, given the lack of extra supply should support and indeed lead to higher prices.

To consider gold prices without considering the supply, demand factors driving the market and in particular the very significant demand from China, India and globally and indeed the central bank demand of today is quiet simplistic and liable to lead to erroneous conclusions regarding future prices.

As ever with insurance, it is important to focus on the value derived by the owner rather than solely speculations regarding the price. When buying insurance – whether that be car, health, house or the financial insurance that is gold it is also important to consider the risk of not having insurance and how much it may cost not to be insured.

Real diversification and an allocation to the insurance that is physical gold remains the key to weathering the second global financial crisis.

 

Gold Prices (LBMA)

23 Mar: USD 1,232.20, EUR 1,101.76 and GBP 870.03 per ounce
22 Mar: USD 1,251.80, EUR 1,117.35 and GBP 876.96 per ounce
21 Mar: USD 1,244.25, EUR 1,104.47 and GBP 863.60 per ounce
18 Mar: USD 1,254.50, EUR 1,112.93 and GBP 868.78 per ounce
17 Mar: USD 1,269.60, EUR 1,119.40 and GBP 883.17 per ounce

Silver Prices (LBMA)

23 Mar: USD 15.58, EUR 13.92 and GBP 10.99 per ounce
22 Mar: USD 15.89, EUR 14.16 and GBP 11.12 per ounce
21 Mar: USD 15.81, EUR 14.02 and GBP 10.99 per ounce
18 Mar: USD 15.94, EUR 14.13 and GBP 11.02 per ounce
17 Mar: USD 15.78, EUR 13.86 and GBP 10.93 per ounce

Gold News and Commentary

Gold futures log gains in wake of Brussels terror attack (Marketwatch)

Global stocks recover from early selloff; safe-haven assets ease (Reuters)

Spot gold slips as dollar gains dampen safe-haven trade (Reuters)

U.S. Stocks Fluctuate After Brussels Attack as Gold, Dollar Gain (Bloomberg)

Venezuela exports $456 Mln in gold to Switzerland amid cash crisis (Reuters)

 

Gold-to-Silver Ratio May Favor Silver (Marketwatch)

Global Ponzi Collapse and Munich Re’s Pot of Gold (Max Keiser)

Greatest crash of your life is just ahead (Nasdaq)

Another damning report suggests fund managers can’t do their jobs (Money Week)

Why Goldman is wrong about gold (CNBC)

Read More Here

www.GoldCore.com 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1RzIrV6 GoldCore

Oil Hits Critical Choke Point: Why “The Market Faces A Round Of Rapid Stockbuilds”

One month ago, just as Cushing storage was rapidly approaching its operational capacity, we warned that Cushing (and increasingly all parts of PADD 2) is denying storage requests. We also said that overall PADD 2 inventories had risen to a new record high 155 million barrels…

… hinting that it was just a matter of time before excess production would be shifted to other regions, most notably the Gulf Coast, or PADD 3.

In the intervening month, this is precisely the dynamic we have observed, which culminated with today’s weekly DOE announcement which saw not only a massive inventory build, one which surpassed the estimate threefold (surpassing yesterday’s gargantuan API build in the process), but also has confirmed that oil storage is now shifting away from Cushing and PADD 2 to PADD 3 just as we expected, to wit:

  • PADD 1: East Coast +1.8
     
  • PADD 2: Midwest -0.1
     
  • PADD 3: Gulf Coast +9.0
  • PADD 4: Rocky Mount +0.1
  • PADD 5: West Coast -1.4  

This confirms that the shift away from Midwestern storage to the Gulf Coast has begun in earnest, which was to be expected for a region that is already at operational capacity, even when netting out the excess oil that is being “exported” out of the US to Europe, Asia or Latin America. In fact, as shown in the chart below, with over 533 million barrels in storage, it is only a matter of time before oil overflows into swimming pools and household buckets.

 

Unfortunately, while most of this was as expected and suggests  that the excess supply situation in the US is getting worse by the day, not even we expected the dour picture painted by some key industry participants.

According to Reuters, trading houses such as Vitol, Glencore, Gunvor and Trafigura whose most profitable business line in recent months has been oil transit and offshore storage, are betting on oil markets remaining oversupplied for at least two more years even as crude prices stage a recovery driven by early signs of falling production.

These traders are looking to extend or lock in new leases on storage tanks for crude oil and refined products in key hubs as far out as the end of 2018, sources at storage firms and trading houses say.

As we have shown repeatedly in the past by demonstrating surging contangos, storing oil in a heavily oversupplied market has been a cash cow for traders and oil companies in recent years as markets bet that future oil prices will be significantly higher than current ones.

Or, looked another way, that current prices will remain very low. Indeed, “lower for longer.”

Ian Taylor, chief executive of top oil trader Vitol, said on Tuesday that “stocks of crude and products continue to build and these will weigh upon the market.”  Like other traders, Vitol has invested in recent years in storage, and last August acquired the other half of its VTTI storage subsidiary for $830 million.

As we also showed two weeks ago, with oil prices rising substantially since mid-February to around $40 per barrel, this has led to a significant narrowing of the crude contango despite a stock overhang of 300 million barrels, which means storage plays such as Vitols are suddenly far less lucrative.

Indeed, crude oil has found more of a balance in recent weeks through supply disruptions in Iraq, Libya and Nigeria (all of which are transitory).

However, while upstream, or crude, supply may have artificially stabilized modestly, downstream products have continued to build, something we also noted one month ago in “There’s A Feeling Of Bits Of Ice Cracking All At Once” – This Is The ‘Big New Threat’ To Oil Prices” in which we showed the dramatic buildup of gasoline and distillate products. 

Reuters today also touches on this and cautions that “refined oil products have not followed suit” the broader oil rebalancing. In fact “gasoline and blending components have been quietly building, squeezing the amount of storage left in Europe. U.S. gasoline stocks, when adjusted for current consumption, are just at the top of their 10-year range.”

Krien van Beek, head of sales at RVB Tank Storage Solutions, a tank storage broker in the Netherlands, said traders are seeking storage on 12-month leases for products such as gasoline and naphtha outside key hubs in northern Europe, Singapore and the United States. “They are prepared to look at storage for the longer term because of the contango in the market but everyone is cautious about costs because we are at the top of the storage market,” van Beek said. “Since the standard storage options are taken, traders are considering less conventional and less attractive locations.”

According to RVB, global commercial tank capacity is around 900 million cubic meters across 4,400 facilities – not including “captive tanks” in refineries that are not open to commercial buyers.

In short: because the US is already on the verge of operational capacity for most liquidity commodities, soon the entire world will likewise be full to the brim with excess oil, distillates and gasoline as oil production continues to ooze into what the Saudis recently characterized as a 3MM b/d oversupplied market.


Which brings us to what Reuters describes as a key production “choke point”, one which is “forming in middle distillates – the diesel used to power trucks and generators, and the heating oil that warms homes around the world in winter.”

Typically, these stocks fall over the winter. But warm weather this year kept this from happening – all while refineries worldwide ran full steam to feed seemingly insatiable demand for gasoline in the United States, China and India.

Global distillate stocks in the developed world are close to a record high, in the thick of refinery maintenance season, and in the run-up to the time when gasoline use hits its summer high point, but interest in diesel typically fades.

“Absent run cuts, the market faces another round of rapid stockbuilds once refineries return from maintenance,” Robert Campbell of Energy Aspects said in a note.

At that point, the oversupply becomes self-fulfilling as the supply curve inverts that much more while producers scramble to find any marginal buyer in a world drowning with product, and unless some dramatic solution is found to stem the supply of the most upstream product, namely oil, whose dynamics we explained one month ago as follows…

As Paul Horsnell, global head of commodities research at Standard Chartered puts it, “There’s a feeling of various bits of ice cracking all at once” in the oil market, with both crude-oil and gasoline inventories at extremely high levels… People are worried about a short-term issue, particularly in the U.S., particularly at Cushing.

 

The good news is that we are likely very close to the worst case scenario playing out: refiners are unlikely to start buying more crude in the coming weeks. Instead, many will begin seasonal maintenance ahead of the busy summer-driving season. That could leave some oil producers scrambling to find places to store their output. Prices in some regions might have to drop sharply to justify the cost of shipping the oil to where it can be stored.

… with every passing week in which nothing changes in the fundamental supply/demand picture, the most likely outcome will be a violent inventory liquidation over the next few weeks, one which will be accompanied by a substantial plunge in oil prices resulting from wholesale dumping as producers rush to sell product to anyone who will buy it.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ZtrkUR Tyler Durden

12-Year-Old Girl Arrested for Pinching Boy’s Butt, Sent to Juvenile Detention

GirlPolice arrested a Longwood, Florida, 12-year-old girl for pinching a male classmate’s butt during school hours. Breana Evans has been charged with misdemeanor battery and was temporarily placed in juvenile detention. 

Everybody involved in this story—Breana, her father, the cops, her alleged victim—thinks the arrest is an overreaction. Everybody, except the boy’s mom, who alerted police and demanded that they prosecute. 

“I regret it because I didn’t know it would lead to this,” Breana told WPTV.com

Breana claims she didn’t know the boy. She pinched him because that’s just something her friends do. Keep in mind that she is 12. 

The school resource deputy—that’s the police officer who patrols the school—didn’t charge her with a crime because the boy didn’t want to press charges. Instead, Breana was suspended. 

But the boy’s mother insisted to police that he was the victim of battery, and so they had no choice but to arrest Breana. She was Mirandized and put in a patrol car. They took her mugshot and booked her into juvenile detention. 

The state attorney said that Breana will have to complete community service, submit to drug tests, and take classes. If she does all those things, the charges will eventually be dismissed. 

Breana’s actions were wrong. She should not have violated that boy’s personal space. It was appropriate for the school to tell her to keep her hands to herself, and even to give her some light punishment. But a suspension seems a tad overboard, unless the boy was deeply humiliated or scarred. Nothing in the story suggests that this was the case. 

Part of growing up is learning to respect other people’s boundaries, and schools should play a role in instructing kids to behave like adults. 

The police, on the other hand, have no role to play in the lives of non-violent, non-troubled kids who are making typical kid mistakes. It is ludicrous to charge Breana with a crime. She’s not a criminal, she’s a normal pre-teen. Kids push each other around. They mess with each other. Police should interfere only when such conduct is actually threatening. A kid who repeatedly punches another kid might deserve a visit to juvenile detention. A kid who pinches another kid deserves a time-out. 

But given the new obsession with child safety, and paranoia about sex crimes, I’m actually a bit surprised Breana hasn’t also been charged with sexual harassment. If Breanna were a boy and the victim a girl, perhaps the authorities would have imposed a harsher sentence. (A 13-year-old boy in Maryland who kissed a 14-year-old girl on a dare was charged with second-degree assault.) 

“Lord, lord, lord, what’s this world come to?” asked Breana’s father. “Kid can’t even be a kid.” 

And that’s exactly the problem. When we expect perfect behavior from children, we set them up for failure. If they’re not allowed to make mistakes, then they’re not allowed to grow up. Putting a kid in jail for a one-off physical encounter is cruel, it’s unnecessary, and it betrays a profound naivety about the social development of young people. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1MCFeMT
via IFTTT

“It’s No Longer A Market But A Battlefield” – Why Crispin Odey’s $11 Billion Fund Has 5% Daily Swings

In February, Cripsin Odey’s quite bearish $11 billion Odey Asset Management had a tumultuous month: it was down -10.6% as the overall market levitated relentlessly on low volume hopes of central bank stimulus and intervention ever since the February 11 lows, leading to the biggest short squeeze in history and the most overbought market ever.

 

However, as Crispin himself would go on to admit, February’s 11% drop was just an appetizer. Because what happened in March, when Crispin went on to not only fight the Fed but declare war on every single central bank, was unprecedented. In his own words “by mid-March the fund was rising and falling by over 5% per day. At which point this was no longer an investment market but a battlefield.”

Does he regret it? Not at all – Odey is convinced these desperate central bank interventions are just a confirmation that they have run out of ammo, and for the most part, he is absolutely spot on:

Central banks can ignore the CDS market, but they cannot imagine away the losses coming through the system. They cannot save the banks now, without creating a recession, with all the consequences that has for bad loans and falls in GNP. The fall in productivity is already encouraging companies to eschew capital spending in favour of buy backs, which compounds the problem of credit growing faster than the economy. Profit margins are naturally falling as wages rise faster than prices and overcapacity rules out pricing power. No wonder that central banks feel that they are nearly out of ammunition. There is not a good choice to be made.

For now their choice has been to save preserve the markets, as the next crash in stocks may well be the last before the Fed and its central planning peers have no choice but to unleash the helicopter money.

In the meantime, we eagerly look forward to observing Odey’s valiant daily fight with Yellen et al, armed with the following top 10 positions…

 

… resulting in a net exposure of just about -110% net.

 

* * *

Here are his latest monthly thoughts:

Bull markets do not die of old age. They are murdered by central banks. How far away we are from that old adage. The last six weeks have seen yet again central banks responding to further weakness in the world economy, by lowering or at least not raising interest rates and continuing to subsidise the weakest. Wherever they see any sign of distress as with the CDS market in Europe, their response is to believe that risk premiums are unfairly rising and immediately to take action to cancel the effect.

However, several years of watching central banks responding to ever falling productivity numbers by reducing interest rates have shown that they can effect asset prices with their actions, but that not only do they have almost no effect on economic activity, but they positively damage it.

The reason is simple. Banks work, like everyone else, off profit margins and the lower and longer interest rates remain close to zero, the more that net interest margins shrink and the less inclined, because profits are falling, are they to countenance new lending.

Without credit expansion there can be no strong nominal growth of GNP globally. Strangely even where there is strong credit growth, nominal incomes have responded sluggishly. For this is the good news. Over the last twelve months there have been 20% more dollars created in relation  to GNP in the USA than a year ago. In China there have been over 30% more renminbi created. This should have resulted in blow out growth of nominal incomes, but in fact GNP in the USA has grown by 4.5% and in China by just under 7%. In both instances private indebtedness has grown by multiples of that. That a 20% increase in dollars has only resulted in inflation of 2.1%, reveals that strange things are happening. It has not just been worrying us here, but also seems to have unnerved the Fed. On all our numbers such credit growth would have resulted in over 5 or 6 interest rate hikes by this time in the cycle.

What frightens them and should frighten us all is that the overcapacity built up post 2008/9 in so many industries linked with China is now coming through in a severe credit down cycle. An unwillingness to countenance closure of capacity, even as new capacity was still being added, in the face of prices that were far below fair value, have ensured these industries have ongoing losses which are still not abating. And this is where it gets interesting, because these losses are undermining the loans that these industries have. As bonds due for redemption trade below par, companies are drawing down credit lines, which would usually be the signal that bankruptcies would follow. However, because of the very weak profitability of the banking sector, these banks are not able to absorb these losses. As they wait, their loan becomes the cash to pay back the bonds and their losses expand. Banks now need rights issues but the central banks’ attention remains on trying to lower rates to reflect falling productivity. There is thus no story to attach to a rights issue for a bank. The only way that the banks would be a buy is if interest rates were to go up, repricing assets relative to deposits, but that can never be because down that route lies recession. And strangely recessions are no longer permitted. However, negative productivity rates are already telling the central banks that any growth in nominal GNP is the equivalent of eating your capital.

Central banks can ignore the CDS market, but they cannot imagine away the losses coming through the system. They cannot save the banks now, without creating a recession, with all the consequences that has for bad loans and falls in GNP. The fall in productivity is already encouraging companies to eschew capital spending in favour of buy backs, which compounds the problem of credit growing faster than the economy. Profit margins are naturally falling as wages rise faster than prices and overcapacity rules out pricing power. No wonder that central banks feel that they are nearly out of ammunition. There is not a good choice to be made.

Markets need equilibrium to prosper. When the authorities have a problem, markets have a problem. We have been hurt by this rally in China-related companies, and indeed we reduced the gross and net positioning of the fund significantly in mid-March, to help reduce the short term volatility of the fund, but we remain convinced that China is in many ways in an even greater bind over policy than the developed world. By mid-March the fund was rising and falling by over 5% per day. At which point this was no longer an investment market but a battlefield. On the day that Draghi came out with his massive market support operation, the stock markets rose 2.5% and then closed down 1.5% on their lows. Imagine how painful it was to see the markets bounce the next day and celebrate his success. At that point I reduced the short book by a third and the long book by 10%.

Despite this strong rally, there is, aside from a pickup in government spending in China, little to support growth in the world economy. Everything from rising default rates in the booming auto financing industry to new lows in LNG, dry bulk shipping prices, points to slowdown everywhere.

For equity markets, a world without credit is for now a deflationary world. The underperformance of the banking, insurance and asset management industry warn that this is when equities can de-rate as the Japanese stock market did between ’96 and ’98.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ZtkwX9 Tyler Durden

30Y Treasury Yield Tumbles, Signals Trouble Ahead For Banks

Safe haven buying is ignoring precious metals and piling into bonds today with the long-end notably outperforming (-6bps) today. This has compressed the yield curve even more, putting more and more pressure on the “rate-hike environment” hopers who bought banks like they were told…

 

 

This has compressed 2s30s below the “Dimon Bottom”

 

Fool me three times?


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1U9oowZ Tyler Durden

Belgium Ignored Warning From Turkey On Brussels Bomber, Erdogan Says

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is a man who knows something about “terrorists.” After all, he’s surrounded by them. Kurds are terrorists. Opposition lawmakers are terrorists. Journalists are terrorists. Lawyers are terrorists. Hell, even teachers are terrorists in Turkey these days.

Fortunately, Erdogan knows how to deal with the “problem.” Ideally you kill them, but if for whatever reason that’s not possible (turns out some people get all hung up over the whole “human rights” thing), you throw them in jail or you deport them. 

The other thing about Erdogan is that he’s an exceptionally benevolent man who just wants to help, which is why when he finds a militant he can’t kill and needs instead to deport, he likes to warn his “friends” in the EU that he’s sending trouble their way. On Wednesday, Erdogan claimed one of the Brussels attackers was deported to Belgium in June after Ankara determined that he was a “foreign fighter”. Here’s AP:

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said one of the Brussels attackers was caught in Turkey in June and deported to Belgium.

 

Erdogan said Wednesday that the Belgian authorities released the suspect despite Turkish warnings that he was “a foreign fighter.”

 

Erdogan did not name the attacker.

 

He said the man was detained at Turkey’s border with Syria at Gaziantep and that Turkey formally notified Belgian authorities of his deportation on July 14.

 

Erdogan said “despite our warnings that this person was a foreign terrorist fighter, Belgium could not establish any links with terrorism.

Under the EU’s new agreement with the Turks, Erdogan will effectively be responsible for vetting all Syrian refugees that enter Western Europe (that’s part of the whole one-for-one swap arrangement).

For his trouble, he’ll get as much as €6 billion from Brussels.

We suppose the above means the EU will be much safer now that Erdogan will be able to provide an early warning on potential jihadists. It’s a good thing Ankara has never been suspected of having any ties to Sunni extremist elements…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1U9oogz Tyler Durden