The Rise Of The Fatty

For all the talk about QE this, HFT that, crony capitalism, cold war 2.0, hyperinflation, hyperdeflation, social inequality, Keynesian dead end, global financial meltdown, perhaps the one more tangible threats to mankind as a whole (and to the future underfunded healthcare costs) is something fatr simpler: the rise of the fatty.


Below we present a candied look via Nature of, pardon the pun, society at large, and just why is it that those cuddly, jovial fat people, which seems to be growing exponentially in recent years, present a great danger not only to themselves, but to just as exponentially growing welfare costs in a world which already is, for all intents and purposes, insolvent (unless of course someone in charge gets a Swiftian idea to let the world’s obese deal with their own problems just the way Charles Darwin suggested they should).

They are everywhere.

 

They don’t fit on the scale.

 

A lot of their problems can be explained by the surge in cheap, hollow calories.

 

But the bottom line is they are a danger: to themselves, and to those others who will be tasked to pay for their care.

Source: Nature




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1iI0tAY Tyler Durden

Unhappy Earth Day

As the world celebrates “Earth Day” and all the wondrous beauty this planet has to offer, those investing from another world will likely be allocating away from the constant economic-growth-disappointing planet Earth. As the following chart of world growth hopes shows… it’s anything but happy…

 

 

h/t @Not_Jim_Cramer




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1nn6vKs Tyler Durden

Second US Warship Enters Black Sea To “Promote Peace And Stability”

Less than two short weeks ago, the US sent their first warship into The Black Sea to “reassure NATO allies and Black Sea partners.” Since then, thing shave escalated and then de-escalated last week with the so-called “truce deal.” So why is the US sending a second ship? The Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate USS Taylor (FFG 50), homeported in Mayport, Fla., will enter the Black Sea April 22 to “promote peace and stability in the region.” We are sure that Putin will stand idly by and watch as NATO and the US build forces on his borders, but no matter how aggressive his response, the US Navy combat dolphin and sea lion team will not accompany the mission.

 

As Navy reports,

The Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate USS Taylor (FFG 50), homeported in Mayport, Fla., will enter the Black Sea April 22 to promote peace and stability in the region.

 

 

The U.S. Navy routinely operates ships in the Black Sea consistent with the Montreux Convention and International Law. Taylor’s mission is to reassure NATO allies of the U.S. Navy’s commitment to strengthen and improve interoperability while working toward mutual goals in the region.

 

Taylor recently completed repairs at Naval Support Activity Souda Bay, Greece. After a round of sea trials that measured the vessel’s performance, general seaworthiness, speed and maneuverability, she has now resumed her operations.

 

Taylor is deployed in a multi-mission role in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations to contribute to regional maritime security, conduct bilateral and multilateral training missions, and to support NATO operations and deployments throughout the region.

We are sure Putin will simply watch and not respond in any way as this happens, but as The Guardian reports,

However ominously martial Russia’s actions toward Ukraine have become, the next combatants in the crisis will not be the US navy’s fleet of dolphins.

 

 

Yes, the navy trains and keeps dolphins, whose powerful innate echolocation abilities help sailors spot suspicious undersea objects that might be mines. The marine mammal enlistees are the aquatic equivalent of the dogs, whose sophisticated sense of smell has aided US soldiers in the hunt for homemade insurgent bombs on land.

But, contrary to reports, the dolphins are not accompanying the USS Donald Cook to the Black Sea.

Russia’s Izvestia newspaper recently asserted that a team of US dolphins had formed a maritime security perimeter around the Cook, a guided missile destroyer the US recently sent to international waters near Ukraine.

Last week, Russian fighter jets passed over the warship in a move the Pentagon considered a provocation, but it is unclear what the dolphins would have done to confront Russian airpower.

 

The question is moot, since, according to the navy, the dolphins were never alongside the Cook in the first place.

“There is no truth to this report,” said Lieutenant Commander Katie Cerezo, a navy spokeswoman.

The dolphins and sea lions are rarely deployed. In addition to worldwide demonstrations and exhibitions, the vast majority of actual naval dolphin operations are conducted in US harbors and ports, said Ed Budzyna, a spokesman for the naval marine mammal program.

 

“As far as being deployed to other regions and areas, that doesn’t really happen,” Budzyna said. “I don’t believe they were ever at the Black Sea.”




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1gPE8x8 Tyler Durden

The Political Poison of Vested Interests

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

Once vested interests take control, the only possible "solution" left is collapse.

I have long identified diminishing returns as a key dynamic in the current unraveling of the Status Quo. Why is this so? We can summarize diminishing returns as dumping more money, capital, energy and effort into a system just to keep the output from falling to zero.

But as the costs of keeping the system from imploding rise, they soon consume all the oxygen in the system, and the system implodes anyway.

The Fatal Disease of the Status Quo: Diminishing Returns (May 1, 2013)

Our Era’s Definitive Dynamic: Diminishing Returns (November 11, 2013)

Sickcare, higher education and insanely expensive weapons systems are all examples of this dynamic. The higher education cartel has raised gargantuan sums to fund its poor quality product by turning students into debt-serfs via student loans.


We must add a second definitive dynamic: protecting vested interests. There are many ways of describing powerful constituencies with an enormous stake in maintaining the Status Quo–vested or entrenched interests, for example–but the key characteristic is the enormous political pain that these groups can inflict on self-serving politicos.

Once confronted with an aroused vested interest–public union, cartel, corporatocracy, Power Elite, etc.–politicos cave in and do what is politically expedient: avoid any real reform and simply shovel more money into the gaping maw of diminishing returns.

A good example is soaring higher education costs and the decline of actual learning and the real-world value of a college diploma. The long-term study Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses concluded that "American higher education is characterized by limited or no learning for a large proportion of students."

But rather than enable (or even insist) on real reforms that dramatically lowered costs and improved results, the political Status Quo responds to the higher education cartel's screams for more money by extending more student credit and taxpayer-paid aid to the cartel.

(I address all these issues in my book The Nearly Free University and The Emerging Economy: The Revolution in Higher Education.)

Once politicos respond to the cries for more money and protection from diminishing returns from vested interests, the real problem festers, unsolved and addressed, while the politically expedient "solution" drains resources away from real reform and exacerbates the underlying problem.

You see the end-game this cycle of vested interests and political expedience creates: as the real problems go unaddressed, they further diminish returns, which triggers even more frantic calls by vested interests for more funding and more protection from the creative destruction of diminishing returns.
Meanwhile, the opportunity cost of supporting diminishing-return vested interests continually increases as scarce resources are squandered on supporting entrenched interests.

Eventually the parasitic entrenched interests have consumed all the oxygen in the system and the system collapses under its own weight.

In a political system where money buys concentrated political power, decisions that affect 100% of the populace are made to benefit the 5% most powerful entrenched interests. How can wise decisions be made when all decision-making centers around placating politically dominant interests? Answer: they can't. Decisions made to protect and favor the few at the expense of the many are intrinsically unwise, as they are blind to the consequences heaped on the voiceless 95%.

Vested interests span the entire political spectrum. The "progressive" favorites, banking, higher education, public unions and sickcare, are all able to veto any reforms that threaten their share of the swag or that demand higher returns on the ever-rising sums poured into these systems.

The "conservative" favorites, banking (every politico is beholden to financial Elites), weaponry, energy, and corporate welfare, are equally able to squelch reform that threatens their share of the swag.

Combine diminishing returns with the political dominance of vested interests and you get a system incapable of reforming itself and incapable of stopping the slide off the cliff. Vested interests have no concern for the unintended consequences of their self-aggrandizement; the entire poilitical structure is based on the faith that there is always more money to feed the insatiable hunger of entrenched interests for more funding, more protection and more power.

That there might be limits that cannot be surpassed without imploding the entire rickety, corrupt system is a danger that cannot be recognized, much less discussed in the halls of power, lest the faith that unwise decisions and spending can pile up year after year and decade after decade forever be questioned.

And so the only possible "solution" left is collapse. This is the lesson of the book The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization, which illustrates that the solution has always been collapse when corrupted, self-serving vested interests gain control of the political system and the economy.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jx2sEK Tyler Durden

Chris Christie Opposes Pot Legalization Because He Doesn’t Want New Small Businesses or Tourists in His State

Last night on his radio show, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie
wanted to make sure everyone knew he really, really
doesn’t think it’s cool to legalize marijuana
 and that not
even “casual use” is OK. After all, think of the potential
consequences! 

“Go to Colorado and see if you want to live there,” the governor
said. “See if you want to live in a major city in Colorado, where
there are headshops popping up on every corner, and people flying
into your airport just to get high.

No siree. Wouldn’t want new small businesses opening up or
tourists coming to your state. That would be terrible.

He added:

“To me, it’s not the quality of life we want to have here in the
state of New Jersey,” he added. “And here’s no tax revenue that’s
worth that.

He could have stopped before the last three words.

The governor has also said that
he’s worried about the “profit motive”
sneaking into his state
if a recent
bill
 submitted in the state legislature to legalize
possession of marijuana of up to an ounce passes. He famously
dragged his feet on much needed liberalization of medical marijuana
in the state as well, as this Reason TV video
shows
:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1fmewHH
via IFTTT

WTF Headline Of The Day: Tax-Cheating IRS Staff Got Bonuses

If you read this without saying “umm, what?” read it again… USA Today notes that a report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration shows the IRS handed out $2.8 million in bonuses to employees with disciplinary issues – including more than $1 million to employees who didn’t pay their federal taxes.

 

As USA Today continues,

The report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration said 1,146 IRS employees received bonuses within a year of substantiated federal tax compliance problems.

 

The bonuses weren’t just monetary. Employees with tax problems received a total of 10,582 hours of paid time off — valued at about $250,000 — and 69 received permanent raises through a step increase, the report said. The report looked at bonuses in 2011 and 2012.

 

Employees’ tax problems included “willful understatement of tax liabilities over multiple tax years, late payment of tax liabilities, and underreporting of income,” the report said.

 

The IRS said it has instituted a policy to take conduct into account when handing out bonuses to senior executives. Making that policy apply to all of the agency’s workers would require negotiations with the National Treasury Employees Union. The union did not respond to a request for comment.

 

“We take seriously our unique role as this nation’s tax administrator, and we will strive to implement a policy that protects the integrity of the tax administration system and the reputation of the service,” IRS chief Human Capital Officer David Krieg said in a written response to the audit.

So – if you are a non-government-employee who doesn’t pay your taxes, you get jail and accounts frozen… but if you’re an IRS employee… you get a fucking bonus!!!




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1gPzSOg Tyler Durden

There Should Be No ‘Punishment’ Phase When a Culture War Ends

Let's not with the "eye for an eye," hmm?Dozens of supporters of gay
marriage, including many noted journalists and scholars, have
signed on to a statement today calling for an end to the kind of
public outrage that haunted ex-Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich when people
discovered he once donated money to the opposing side.

The full statement is posted at Real Clear Politics,
and the signatories include many names recognizable here at
Reason:
Jonathan Rauch
, Paypal’s Peter Thiel, Eugene and Sasha Volokh
(and other contributors to The Volokh Conspiracy), Andrew
Sullivan, Charles Murray, Reason Contributing
Editor
Cathy Young
. The letter calls for advocacy and debate, but an
end to retributive responses to those who have opposed (or still
oppose) same-sex marriage recognition. In the section titled
“Disagreement Should Not Be Punished,”
they argue
:

We prefer debate that is respectful, but we cannot enforce good
manners. We must have the strength to accept that some people think
misguidedly and harmfully about us. But we must also acknowledge
that disagreement is not, itself, harm or hate.

As a viewpoint, opposition to gay marriage is not a punishable
offense. It can be expressed hatefully, but it can also be
expressed respectfully. We strongly believe that opposition to
same-sex marriage is wrong, but the consequence of holding a wrong
opinion should not be the loss of a job. Inflicting such
consequences on others is sadly ironic in light of our movement’s
hard-won victory over a social order in which LGBT people were
fired, harassed, and socially marginalized for holding unorthodox
opinions.

During the debate over whether what happened to Eich was
appropriate—and very frequently in the debate on recognizing gay
marriage itself—supporters of how the conflict ended with Eich
stepping down invoked interracial marriage. Would we have supported
Eich if he was opposed to interracial marriage? How is opposing
same-sex marriage different from opposing interracial marriage?
Indeed, the issue was immediately raised in the comment
thread after signatory Dale Carpenter
posted an excerpt
at The Volokh Conspiracy. Should a
CEO opposed to interracial marriage be immune from any sort of
consequences from such a position?

Since the laws against interracial marriage were struck down so
many years ago, it’s appropriate to respond: Who, actually, was
punished for being on the wrong side of that debate? Did people who
opposed race-mixing lose their jobs for supporting the wrong
candidates? Can anybody point to CEOs who were fired back in the
’60s or ’70s for supporting some racist candidate somewhere? I have
done a bit of a stab at trying to track down any info that such
outcomes happened, but that would seem to take a lot more time than
I have as a blogger.

To the extent that those particular civil rights battles ended,
I don’t recall there being a punishment phase afterward. The
battles were certainly punishment enough. Those people on the wrong
side—and there were millions of them—didn’t go anywhere. They
continued on with their lives under new laws and probably most of
them eventually came around on the issue, or at least kept it to
themselves. Winning a culture war isn’t like winning an actual war.
You’re not stopping an invasion (or initiating one). When the war
is over, the participants are still around and they still have to
negotiate a way to live together. That realization is why the end
of a culture war simply can’t have some sort of Nuremberg Trials.
There isn’t an equivalent. You have to live next door to people who
may have extremely different views from yours. Sometimes, those
views were actually the majority view at one point. If you try to
initiate a punishment phase, why would your opponents then agree to
stop fighting and accept your victory?

Nobody who knows the history of the gay movement in the United
States should countenance people being punished by their employers
for the way they express themselves, unless they value revenge more
than liberty (some probably do, sadly). The conclusion of the
letter notes:

LGBT Americans can and do demand to be treated fairly. But we
also recognize that absolute agreement on any issue does not exist.
Franklin Kameny, one of America’s earliest and greatest gay-rights
proponents, lost his job in 1957 because he was gay. Just as some
now celebrate Eich’s departure as simply reflecting market demands,
the government justified the firing of gay people because of “the
possible embarrassment to, and loss of public confidence in…the
Federal civil service.” Kameny devoted his life to fighting back.
He was both tireless and confrontational in his advocacy of
equality, but he never tried to silence or punish his
adversaries.

Now that we are entering a new season in the debate that Frank
Kameny helped to open, it is important to live up to the standard
he set. Like him, we place our confidence in persuasion, not
punishment. We believe it is the only truly secure path to equal
rights.

The tragedy was not that this sort of workplace treatment
happened to gays and lesbians (or that it still happens). It was
that it happened to anybody at all.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1icZHNr
via IFTTT

Police Officer Tells Parents They Could Be ‘Trespassing’ on School Property If They Oppose Standardized Testing

abba caddabaThe Finneys of Marietta, Georgia, have been
fighting their local school district over the state’s standardized
exam battery, the Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests, taken in
third, fifth, and eighth grades and used to determine promotion to
the next grade. Two of their three children were required to take
tests this month, a third grader and a fifth grader, but the
parents refused. At one point they said they thought they had a
meeting scheduled with the principal to talk about their concerns.
Instead, they were met by a cop.
Via the Marietta Daily Journal
:

The Finneys worked out a meeting with school
administrators early Wednesday morning to talk things over. But
when they arrived, they were confronted by a police officer instead
of the principal. 

According to Tracey Finney, the officer was extremely nice and
professional, but told them being on school property while actively
opposed to the test was “kind of a trespassing thing” and that
their kids weren’t allowed on the property either if they weren’t
going to take the test. The officer’s report confirms the parents
were told they and their students would be trespassing if they
stayed on the property.

The principal says the meeting was cancelled a couple of hours
after it was confirmed via email that morning. The Finneys say they
were told they could send their children to school after the tests
were administered in the morning, but the school then told them
make-up testing would take place in the afternoons. The Finneys say
they like the public school system but that they will send their
children to private school or homeschool them if their children
will be compelled to take the tests.

While the tests have been mandatory in Georgia since 2000, in a
statement
picked up
by The Daily Caller the family
linked their concern over the data-collection aspect of
standardized testing to Common Core. “People don’t realize it,” the
statement read in part. “We don’t want to sound like we’re wearing
tin-foil hats, but they want to track our kids from kindergarten
through college.”

Earlier this year, Colorado parent Sean Black reportedly
got a visit from a cop after he told a state bureaucrat that he
wanted opt his disabled child out of a test. In
Colorado, teachers
with children in public schools
are among the loudest opponents
of standardized testing, and Black, also a teacher, was eventually

allowed
to opt his child out.

The Finneys, meanwhile, deny that they’re trying to opt out of
the test. Rather, they insist what they’re doing—refusing to have
their children take it—is different. State officials say there’s
nothing in the law to allow for opting out.

This is, of course, the kind of thing that could be curbed by
replacing state and federal standardization and centralization with
a system in which funding
follows the students to the schools of their choice

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1icZGcq
via IFTTT

Ex-Morgan Stanley Chief Economist Admits “Fed Is Distorting Markets”

Stephen Roach, former Chief Economist at Morgan Stanley, has never been shy to share his opinions about the world and having left the Wall Street firm is even freer to speak uncomfortable truthiness. This brief clip, as Sovereign Man’s Simon Black notes, says it all so succinctly… “The market has been distorted by far bigger forces than flash trading. To me, the force that has rigged the market… is the Federal Reserve, not the flash traders.”

We recommend skipping to 13:05 for about 30 seconds of brilliance if you’re pressed for time:




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1nmU3uh Tyler Durden