Why Common Core Will Fail: ‘Children Are Not Standardized’

KidForbes contributor Alice Walton has
written a terrific roundup of the anti-Common Core expert
consensus. Numerous education researchers and academics have
reservations about greater classroom standardization—particularly
in the early grades, where excessive testing and homework is most
deleterious for kids.

Walton
writes
:

David Elkind, long-time child development expert at Tufts
University and author ofThe Hurried Child, says that a
related problem with the Common Core standards is that “children
are not standardized.” Between ages 4 to 7, he says, kids are
undergoing especially rapid changes in cognitive ability, but this
neurological and psychological development occurs at all different
rates. “Some children attain these abilities—which enable them to
learn verbal rules, the essence of formal instruction—at different
ages.

Some of the experts cited by Walton argued the long hours of
standardized testing that kindergartners must endure under Common
Core are wholly inappropriate:

 Diane Ravitch,
education historian at NYU and vocal criticof
the Common Core, says that in particular, “the early grades are
developmentally inappropriate. Children of 5 and 6 and 7 need time
for play, not a forced academic march. They will have 6-hour,
8-hour tests. That is nuts…. The American ideal was always a
well-rounded child prepared for citizenship and life. Now it is all
test prep.”

While others disputed the notion—vehemently asserted by Core
supporters—that the standards are internationally benchmarked:

[2013 New York High School Principal of the Year Carol Burris]
adds that exactly which countries to which the Common Core is
benchmarked remains a mystery. “What’s so fascinating is that many
of the high-performing countries children start much later. In some
countries, like Singapore, there are two years of Kindergarten. In
Finland, another high performing nation, students start much later.
In Canada, which uses provincial standards, the early years are a
time for play and exploration. No one can find to what country
these Standards are benchmarked.”

Full article
here
.

There are of course many experts who dispute the above notions
and believe that Common Core is an improvement over what is being
offered in many American schools. They may even be right; it’s
perfectly possible that Common Core is bad and what it’s replacing
is worse. This is the public school system we are talking about,
after all.

But why waste tons of time, money, and effort enacting an
across-the-board reform that makes kids miserable, relies on deeply
unsettled science, has no demonstrable benefit, and deals a death
blow to federalism (at least as far as national education policy is
concerned)?


More choice
, not less, is what will save public education. As
Elkin observed, kids don’t come standard.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/10/23/experts-attack-common-core-children-are
via IFTTT

Why Dems and Reps Both Want a Midterm Election About Nothing

Less than two weeks away, the midterm elections
seem like an episode of Seinfeld: They’re
about nothing.

I’ve got
a new Daily Beast column
up about the midterms. Here’s
a snippet:

The most riveting stories so far deal with trivial matters that
sound like deleted scenes from a George Costanza fever dream. Did
Charlie Crist break the rules by having a fan blowing on his
crotch during the Florida guberntorial debate? Is Texas’ Greg
Abbott anti-dildo and anti-interracial marriage? Did Colorado
Congressman Cory Gardner really play high school football?

Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans mustered the
strength to articulate a unified vision for the country, and
individual candidates are mostly running on a variation of the
theme that they’re not as completely contemptible as their
opponent. Sadly, but predictably, most of them are lying.

The tragicomedy of U.S. politics is that we really do get the
government we deserve. But even a nation of idiots that is
paying Social Security to Nazi war criminals deserves
better than the content-free snarkfest that will come to a pause on
November 4—before starting up again on November 5, as the
preparations for the 2016 presidential election get underway.


More here.

The short version is this: Politicians are refusing to talk
about serious issues because they can get away with it.

Read the
whole thing
to see a surprise endorsement of Hillary Clinton
and Bernie Sanders.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1yqLUaU
via IFTTT

The Biggest Threat To America

Presented with no comment…

Q: “Who is going to defend the country without the Army?”

Zappa: “From what? The biggest threat to America is its own federal government… Will the Army protect anybody from the FBI? The IRS? The CIA? The Republican Party? The Democratic Party?… The biggest dangers we face today don’t even need to sneak past our billion-dollar defense systems… they issue the contracts for them.”

 

Source: The Burning Platform




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1FKlmX8 Tyler Durden

40% Of Eurozone Banks Are In Bad Shape

Submitted by Raul Ilargi Meijer via The Automatic Earth blog,


David Myers Theatre on 9th Street. Washington, DC July 1939

Reuters has had a busy day today reporting on Europe’s banks and the stress tests the European Banking Authority is set to unveil on Sunday. And which put the EU and ECB on a see-saw like balancing act between credibility and panic.

The news bureau started off in the early morning citing a report by Spanish news agency Efe, which said 11 banks would fail the tests:

11 Banks To Fail European Stress Tests

At least 11 banks from six European countries are set to fail a region-wide financial health check this weekend, Spanish news agency Efe reported, citing several unidentified financial sources. The results of the stress tests on 130 banks by the European Central Bank are due to be unveiled on Sunday.

 

Four banks in Greece, three Italian lenders and two Austrian ones are among those that preliminary data showed had failed the tests, Efe said. It gave no details of how much capital the banks would have to raise and said this could yet change as numbers could be revised at the last minute. The euro fell on the report. Efe also identified a Cypriot bank and possibly one from Belgium and one from Portugal.

That’s right, the journalist lists 12 banks there, not 11. But anyway, that text is, miraculously, not available anymore, since at the same URL you now get the following article. Jean-Claude ‘When it gets serious, you lie’ Juncker’s first act in his first day in office as European Commission head may well have been to give Reuters a call. Make that a shout.

ECB Cools Speculation Over Bank Health Checks Ahead Of Results

The European Central Bank cautioned on Wednesday against speculation over the outcome of its stress tests after a media report said at least 11 banks had failed the landmark financial health checks, driving some banking shares lower. Austria’s Erste Group rejected the report from Spanish newswire Efe, which said that it along with banks from Italy, Belgium, Cyprus, Portugal and Greece, had failed the ECB review based on preliminary data, but it gave no details of the size of the capital holes at the banks.

 

The ECB, which will publish the test outcomes for 130 banks on Sunday, said final results had not yet been sent to the lenders involved, and it could not comment on individual institutions. “Any inferences drawn as to the final outcome of the exercise would be highly speculative until the results are final on 26 October,” said an ECB spokesman. The European Banking Authority, the EU watchdog coordinating the Europe-wide stress test, said the results would not be final until they are endorsed on Sunday just prior to publication. It had no comment on individual lenders.

 

Erste told Reuters it had no reason to believe it would fail the test. Banks have already had some feedback on the outcome of the tests through ‘supervisory dialogs’ with the ECB. They get the results on Thursday, three days ahead of the public announcement. The ECB becomes supervisor of the euro zone’s banks on Nov. 4. “Out of the supervisory dialogue we have no indication we won’t pass,” an Erste spokesman said. [..]“The bigger, more important question is not which banks have failed but which banks have achieved only a marginal pass,” said Jeremy Batstone-Carr at Charles Stanley.

 

Sources told Reuters that German public sector lender HSH Nordbank – which was not named in the Efe report – was set to pass the health checks. HSH was seen as the German lender most likely to fall short of requirements. Other than Erste, the banks listed by Efe were Italy’s Banco Popolare, Monte dei Paschi and Banca Popolare di Milano; Greece’s Alpha Bank, Piraeus Bank and Eurobank; Portugal’s Millennium BCP and Belgium’s Dexia. The agency also said a second, unnamed Austrian bank and a Cypriot bank were set to fail.

Looks like Brussels thinks it’s free of leaks to the media. Look, it’s Wednesday, and the banks will get results tomorrow. These are known, and can and will therefore be leaked. It’s 2014. Get with it.

Do note the words I bolded. Banks that only just slipped through the test are a major topic in this. If only because they’ve all had many months to shore up their capital by whatever means possible.

Those who still fail after that should probably have been long gone, while those who make it by a narrow margin are in bad shape. There are many ways to shore up your capital, including some that are temporary, just shy of being 100% legal and/or simply based on accounting tricks.

And of course many problems will remain hidden, for now, behind the veil of ultra cheap credit, either from central banks or corporate bond investors. Because that’s one of the damaging effects of ZIRP: it keeps zombies alive.

Then later in the day Reuters followed up with this interview with Pimco global banking specialist Philippe Bodereau, who says 18 banks will fail. Juncker must have thrown a hissy fit, and then lied about it.

Pimco’s Banking Expert Expects 18 Lenders To Fail ECB Stress Test

Fixed income investment firm Pimco’s global banking specialist, Philippe Bodereau, expects 18 banks will be seen to have failed the European Central Bank’s stress test of 130 regional lenders when results are published by the ECB on Sunday. Bodereau said in an interview on Wednesday the failures would likely include some German and Austrian cooperative and public sector banks, as well as weak regional lenders in the southern periphery.[..]

 

Describing the exercise as a milestone for cleaning up the banks, he said the test was “reasonably credible” when compared with previous tests and provided investors with a starting point to evaluate banks. “It’s pretty clear that not that many banks are going to fail it. A fair amount of balance sheet strengthening has taken place over the last six to nine months in anticipation of this exercise,” Bodereau told Reuters.

 

Big national champions across northern Europe and also in Southern Europe should pass quite easily, he said, although he expected almost a third of those tested to pass by a narrow margin. This group would likely include many medium-sized banks. “Probably the market will ask questions about their dividend policies, about their ability to grow balance sheet, etcetera. They will be under pressure to remain quite conservative on capital management and on deleveraging,” said Bodereau. [..]

 

Given recent market volatility, he said it was more likely there would be a positive than negative market shock after the results are released, and that share prices for the region’s biggest banks could be a market winner on Monday.

130 banks are being tested. 12-18 will fail. And on top of that, almost a third of 130, that’s over 40, will pass while still getting their feet wet. That means anywhere between 40% and 44% of Eurozone banks either fail or are in bad shape. And Bodereau suggests this will lead to a positive market shock on Monday morning. You might want to ask yourself what market position he has taken, how short he is exactly, and what book he’s talking.

If 40% of your banks are either dead in the water or barely floating, I’d say you have a major problem. ECB head Mario Draghi is undoubtedly still stuck in misplaced confidence on account of how well his ‘whatever it takes’ speech worked out, and ‘fresh’ EC head Juncker is as we speak emptying several bottles of champagne at once to celebrate his new job. He’s known to like his drinky.

And the ECB, under current conditions, seems almost entirely powerless to do anything about this, since, as Tyler Durden, using Barclay’s numbers, summarizes, it can only purchase $10 billion or so in ABC/Covered bond purchases per month, and another $5 billion per month in corporate bonds. There is simply not more eligible debt available for it to buy. Its mandate would have to be changed in drastic ways, and that doesn’t seem to be in the cards at all.

To keep markets afloat, however, as Bloomberg notes, $200 billion a quarter in QE from the central bankers is needed. The Fed is almost out, China has mostly withdrawn, Japan has too many domestic problems to look out the window, and the ECB can do just $15 billion a month. Confused? You won’t be .. after next week’s episode of .. the Eurosoap.

We all know our world, be it politics or economics, consists almost exclusively of spin these days, but in the face of these numbers I very much wonder how many people will be willing to bet their own money that Europe can get away with another round of moonsmoke and roses come Monday.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1FKfJYV Tyler Durden

New York’s First Ebola Case? Doctor Treating Ebola Patients In Guinea Rushed To Bellevue Hosptial

Just when you thought it was safe to assume that Ebola-in-America was fixed (one day into Ron Klain’s tenure as Ebola Czar), NYPost reports some rather disquieting news. A New York City doctor – who returned from treating Ebola patients in Guinea 10 days ago – has been rushed under police escort to Bellevue Hospital… He is being tested for Ebola. Market liquidity has dried up instantly!

  • *PATIENT BEING TESTED AT BELLEVUE FOR POSSIBLE EBOLA, NYC SAYS
  • *NYC HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO ISSUE STATEMENT SOON, SPOKESMAN SAYS
  • *NYC: PATIENT WITH FEVER, GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS AT BELLEVUE
  • *NYC SAYS PATIENT EBOLA TEST RESULTS EXPECTED WITHIN 12 HOURS
  • *NYC TRACING ALL OF PATIENT’S CONTACTS
  • *NYC HEALTH DEPARTMENT ALSO WORKING CLOSELY WITH HHC

Full Statement on Patient at Bellevue Hospital

Today, EMS HAZ TAC Units transferred to Bellevue Hospital a patient who presented a fever and gastrointestinal symptoms.

 

The patient is a health care worker who returned to the U.S. within the past 21 days from one of the three countries currently facing the outbreak of this virus.

 

The patient was transported by a specially trained HAZ TAC unit wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).  After consulting with the hospital and the CDC, DOHMH has decided to conduct a test for the Ebola virus because of this patient’s recent travel history, pattern of symptoms, and past work. DOHMH and HHC are also evaluating the patient for other causes of illness, as these symptoms can also be consistent with salmonella, malaria, or the stomach flu.

 

Preliminary test results are expected in the next 12 hours.

 

Bellevue Hospital is designated for the isolation, identification and treatment of potential Ebola patients by the City and State.  New York City is taking all necessary precautions to ensure the health and safety of all New Yorkers.

 

As a further precaution, beginning today, the Health Department’s team of disease detectives immediately began to actively trace all of the patient’s contacts to identify anyone who may be at potential risk. The Health Department staff has established protocols to identify, notify, and, if necessary, quarantine any contacts of Ebola cases.

 

The Health Department is also working closely with HHC leadership, Bellevue’s clinical team and the New York State Department of Health to ensure that all staff caring for the patient do so while following the utmost safety guidelines and protocols.

 

Bellevue and the New York State Department of Health to ensure that all staff caring for the patient do so while following the utmost safety guidelines and protocols.

 

The chances of the average New Yorker contracting Ebola are extremely slim. Ebola is spread by directly touching the bodily fluids of an infected person. You cannot be infected simply by being near someone who has Ebola.

*  *  *

 

As NY Post reports,

A doctor who returned to New York City from Africa 10 days ago was rushed in an ambulance with a police escort from his Harlem home to Bellevue Hospital on Thursday, sources said.

 

He was suffering from Ebola-like symptoms — a 103-degree fever and nausea, sources said.

 

While he was in Africa, the doctor had been treating Ebola patients in Guinea, sources said.

 

He’s undergoing testing at Bellevue to see if he has the deadly virus, sources said.

*  *  *

NBC reports that…

He was transported from a building on 147th Street between Broadway and Amsterdam Avenue to Bellevue, law enforcement source said.

 


*  *  *

USDJPY was first to move then stocks…

 

and VIX was well bid…

 

…and S&P futures liquidty disappeared…

And then another exchange Breaks…

  • *BATS OPTIONS HAS DECLARED SELF-HELP AGAINST ISE GEMINI




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1nAWeMx Tyler Durden

Federal Involvement Is the Problem With Common Core, Education Experts Agree

The Common Core
education standards have become increasingly controversial since
their creation in 2009. Supporters have pointed to the need for

higher, more consistent standards
; much of the opposition has
focused on the
confusing new method of teaching math
. But both of these
arguments ignore the fundamental problem with Common Core: federal
involvement.

By using heavy-handed incentives to compel states to adopt the
standards, the federal government destroyed the notion that Common
Core was a legitimately state-led effort. Washington’s actions made
it nearly impossible for education leaders to adjust the standards
to meet the needs of states and school districts, and prevented
them from testing the standards against alternatives. In short,
they created a rigid, one-size-fits-all approach to education
policy.

This problem has now been recognized by education experts across
the Common Core divide. Chris Minnich, chief executive of the
Council of Chief State School Officers and a prominent Common Core
supporter, acknowledged as much on Wednesday at a
panel discussion
 hosted by the American Enterprise
Institute (AEI), when he said:

“The federal involvement in this has just been not helpful, in
every scenario…I think it’s pretty clear that most of us, I can’t
say ‘all of us who support the standards,’ but most of us, believe
that declaring our independence [from federal involvement], making
sure it is and remains to be state-led, is critical.”

Frederick Hess, director of education policy studies at AEI,
agreed with Minnich, pointing out that that federal involvement was
not only unhelpful but also unnecessary:

“If the federal government had never waded in to this, back in
2009, I think…about 15 states probably would have gone ahead and
done the Common Core on their own. I think they would have figured
out a way to do a common assessment…and I think what we would have
seen was a truly and genuinely state-led effort, which, if it was
working and if it was being implemented well, other states would
have wanted in [on].”

Had Common Core remained a voluntary, ground-up initiative, it
would be far less controversial. States would have the freedom to
tailor its implementation according to their needs, and comparing
outcomes would offer evidence on whether the new method of teaching
math is actually worth the hassle.

This would have meant that Common Core was not a set of national
standards, but that is not a bad thing. On the contrary, having
state rather than federal standards allows for experimentation and
competition. That’s a feature of competitive federalism, and it’s
why education policy was never meant to be the federal government’s
responsibility.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/12kqWjA
via IFTTT

Ebola Took the CDC by Surprise. But They Sure Do Have Lots to Say About Why You’re So Fat and Sleepy.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/10/23/ebola-took-the-cdc-by-surprise-fat
via IFTTT

“Real” Stock Volatility In October Highest Since Lehman

While VIX pumped-and-dumped (in a manner never seen before in its history), ‘real’ volatility of the day to day moves across the major stock indices remains extremely elevated. For the Nasdaq and Dow Transports, the average true range over the last few weeks is the highest since the post-Lehman collapse

 

 

 

The Dow, S&P, and Russell 2000 are back at the highest average true range since the US downgrade in Summaer 2011..

Charts: Bloomberg

*  *  *

Reminder: The Average True Range is a measure of volatility introduced by Welles Wilder in his book: New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems.

The true range indicator is the greatest of the following:

-current high less the current low.

-the absolute value of the current high less the previous close.

-the absolute value of the current low less the previous close.

Simply put, a stock experiencing a high level of volatility will have a higher ATR, and a low volatility stock will have a lower ATR.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1oyvSLJ Tyler Durden

What’s Avant-Garde Now? Social Innovation

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

What qualifies as true avant-garde? Degrowth qualifies–and very little else.

In the 20th century, avant-garde was a term primarily reserved for the arts: fine arts, music, performance and literature. Avant garde–literally fore-guard or vanguard— challenges the conventions of Status Quo measures of beauty and departs from traditional forms and conceptions of value.

In many cases, the departure is designed to shock traditionalists by flaunting accepted norms; by traditional standards, avant-garde art is ugly or disturbing, avant-garde music is atonal and unmelodic, avant-garde theatre flouts conventional narrative structure and avant-garde social movements upend traditional morals and values.

Virtually all design and art fields have been continually disrupted by avant-garde movements, to the point that the conventional consumerist economy now depends on avant-garde (or perhaps quasi-avant-garde) to create "the new" that can be sold at a profit to differentiate the in-crowd from those (sigh–how sad) left behind.

Many forms of avant-garde disrupt "high-brow" conventions of art, music, fashion, interior design, etc. by infusing the medium with low-brow influences. Roy Lichtenstein's appropriation of comic-book art is one example. In effect, "low-brow" becomes hip until it is adopted by the mainstream, at which point high-brow is re-introduced to offer a consumerist means to separate wealthy sophisticates from the lumpen-proletariat and petite-bourgeois masses.

I suspect that this century-long cycle of outraging the conventional has reached marginal returns, and this spells the end of avant-garde in the 20th century modernist sense. Now that every convention has been flouted, there is nothing left to disrupt or shock; "the new" is now simply re-hashed "old."

Since consumerism is based on the insecurity of bourgeois aspirations (i.e. the desire to be identified as belonging to the in-crowd), there must always be something "new" to separate elites from aspirants and aspirants from the masses.

This role is filled by simulacra of avant-garde (i.e. presenting the appearance of "the new" to sell more goods). Fake avant-garde is the ultimate co-option of true innovation, as this quasi-avant-garde serves an entirely conventional purpose: reaping profits from selling consumerist sizzle.

Experience has been commoditized by the tourism industry, and as a result travel only signifies membership in the in-crowd if it is self-directed and leisurely, i.e. a form of consumption that cannot be attained by conventional workers with two weeks vacation.

The only form of travel that separates the in-crowd from the low-brow aspirational masses desperate to put foreign travel on their resume and brag about it on Facebook is travel to exotic locales well off the already-commoditized tourist paths (Oh dahling, Kathmandu is so over-run and boring. Siberia is the place to be.)

These 20th century formulas–breaking the traditional modes to be avant-garde, and using the avant-garde to market new products and experiences–have run out of oxygen. As a result, the arts, music and literature are no longer the source of avant-garde–what is truly disruptive are social innovations that disrupt the consumerist model of constantly marketing faux avant-garde as "the new."

I think this excerpt from the article Information-Commodification offers a succinct summary of how social innovation is the true avant-garde:

"Avant-gardes, on the other hand, are always interesting, but they are not really about art, whatever some silly art school textbooks might say. Avant-gardes are about media, about social relations, about property-forms, but they are only ever incidentally or tactically concerned with art. The most interesting ones around at the moment might be about pharmacology or horticulture or even ‘business models’."

What qualifies as true avant-garde? Degrowth qualifies–the rejection of consumption as a measure of growth, prosperity and advancement. The model of access not ownership is avant-garde, as is the no-middleman movement I have described in the blog.

Degrowth, Anti-Consumerism and Peak Consumption (May 9, 2013)

When Conventional Success Is No Longer Possible, Degrowth and the Black Market Beckon (February 7, 2014)

Degrowth Solutions: Half-Farmer, Half-X (July 19, 2014)

And the Next Big Thing Is … Degrowth? (April 7, 2014)

Any movement that serves to market "the new" in conventional consumerism (and collecting fine art is the ultimate high-brow consumerism) is not avant-garde. The real avant-garde disrupts the consumption and ownership as identity model of aspirational capitalism.

Anything that doesn't disrupt the consumption and ownership as identity model of aspirational capitalism is just another marketing campaign exploiting faux avant-garde.

For more on the photos accompanying this essay, please read Global Bellwether: Japan's Social Depression (September 25, 2014).




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1rnJbua Tyler Durden

The Market Says Markit Is Full Of It: Global PMIs Are Painting An Unrealistically Rosy Picture

Markit (not to be confused with the centrally-planned market) is best known for providing its monthly survey of national (seasonally-adjusted) manufacturing and service industry coincident businesses (whose results just may be released milliseconds early to select, highly paying HFT clients). Surveys which, such as today, are released after extensive adjustments and revisions, at key inflection points designed to achieve one simple thing: restore confidence in the Ponzi, usually when “hard data” indicates a collapse or recession is nigh. Such as last week:

Case in point: in today’s Chinese, European and US manufacturing, not one had underlying constituent data that could be called even remotely attractive. In fact, all the forward-looking indicators were decidedly negative and yet this led to solid headline beats in the two former regions after algos scanned the headline as quickly as they could and unleashed a spree of buying, enough to push equity futures well off the overnight lows and to set the bullish mood for today’s trading day.

But why would one even look at a self-reported survey as an indicator of coincident activity: after all isn’t it beyond obvious that every response will be full of confirmation bias and colored by the respondent’s inherent optimism about the present and the future? Apparently not, and neither is it obvious that for all business participants, hope dies last, something which always influences their responses. The problem is that in a world in which central banks have made a mockery of all other coincident signals, one has to dig very low, although as even Deutsche Bank’s Jim Reid says, “we’ve used this measure less over the last couple of years as central banks have increasingly distorted the relationship between fundamentals and valuation.”

And as Jim Reid shows in the table below, the various regional PMIs have so consistently overshot in their expectations of where the manufacturing and service sector of a given country is throughout 2014, that not even the market believes, well, Markit. To wit:

Of our 8 sample countries plus the Eurozone, seven currently see manufacturing PMIs between 48.8 (France) and 51.7 (Japan). Depending on the country and based on these numbers, our regressions suggest that these  equity markets should generally be flat to slightly higher than 12 months ago. In actuality they’re slightly lower suggesting that the market expects PMIs to edge lower or that equities are cheap if they don’t. The biggest exception is in the US where the last PMI was 56.6 which corresponds to a 18% YoY gain rather than the 11% we actually have. So the US is ‘cheap’ if the PMIs don’t decline from current levels.

In other words, with central planners having lost control of the hard data, and only the soft-data remaining for influencing, bias and data manipulation purposes, it has gotten to the point that Markit’s PMI universe is about to lose credibility too.

Just how bad is the problem? The table below shows two things: either stocks are underpriced by about 10% across the US, Germany, Spain, UK and 20% for Japan (green rectangle), or the latest PMI releases are painting such an abnormally rosy picture of various economies, their signal content no longer exists (red rectangle).

There is, however, more to it: in all of the Markit economist comments today, the one recurring theme was simple – Markit, which recently went public, was begging central bankers to inject even more stimulus (6 years after the great stimulus experiment started) into stocks, pardon, the economy. And yet, Markit was unable to really take down its numbers at this key moment in the hand off from the Fed to the “self-sustaining economy” as a series of PMI misses overnight would have crashed the market. Instead, Markit is letting off air little by little, while doing all it can to preserve the illusion.

The question is will it succeed: will central bankers get the hint and inject a few more trillion in reserves into bank balance sheets, or will they stay largely to the side, forcing the market to fend for itself. If so, watch as the 10% expected pick up in stock performance through the end of the year surges as the QEvalary never comes. In that case, Markit will find itself in a very unpleasant place, when 2-3 months from now, risk selling off, it has to finally catch down to reality.

Will the dramatic tumble in PMI indices then serve as precisely the self-fulfilling prophecy catalyst that sends the world, of which both Japan and Europe are already in a triple-dip, but most importantly the US, in the long-overdue recession which as Albert Edwards opined earlier today, will be the one event that sends markets around the globe crashing.

We should know the answer within a few months.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1wghtWX Tyler Durden