Citi Shutters Lavaflow – 5th Largest ‘Dark Pool’ In America

When the 5th largest dark pool trading venue (by volume) in America is shuttered, as Citi notes because its "capital, resources and efforts would be better redeployed elsewhere," you know there is a problem in US stock trading volumes and liquidity. Everyday we get 'glimpses' of this collapse – most recently yesterday's AAPL flash-crash – as human traders (who provide the 'fish' for the machines) disappear and HFT liquidity-providers pull liquidity in a flash. Crucially, as we hinted previously, we wonder if the large firms are exiting the dark pool business before some engineered market collapse is pinned on these opaque 'markets' who have come under increased regulatory scrutiny.

The demise of LavaFlow…

 

We recently noted that Citi's Lavaflow platform had been overtaken by the anti-HFT group IEX…

 

And after facing fines earlier in the year…

A private trading venue owned by Citigroup will pay a $5 million penalty to settle charges that it failed to protect customers' data, marking the latest case in a crackdown by U.S. regulators over alleged market rule violations.

 

The Securities and Exchange Commission said the unit, LavaFlow Inc., is settling the civil case without admitting or denying the charges.

 

The SEC said LavaFlow failed to put adequate safeguards and procedures in place to protect its subscribers' confidential trading information from March 2008 through March 2011.

 

 

The SEC's prior three cases against ATS venues were targeting a type of platform known as a "dark pool," which lets investors trade anonymously and does not publicly display quotes.

 

LavaFlow is distinct in that it is not a dark pool. Rather, it operates as an "electronic communications network," or ECN, a trading venue that displays some information about pending orders in the system.

Reuters reports, Citi is pulling the plug…

Citigroup Inc said on Tuesday it is shutting down its alternative stock trading venue LavaFlow at a time when regulatory scrutiny around broker-run trading platforms has increased, forcing banks to rethink their costs.

 

"Following a recent review of the LavaFlow ECN, we have decided that our capital, resources and efforts would be better redeployed to other areas within Citi’s Equities Division," Citi said in a statement.

*  *  *




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vd0eQa Tyler Durden

With Its Gold “Vaporized”, A Furious Ukraine Turns On Its Central Bankers

As reported two weeks ago, following to a stunning announcement by the head of Ukraine’s central bank, Valeriya Gontareva, we learned that (virtually) all of Ukraine’s gold was gone, or – in the parlance of Jon Corzine – had “vaporized.”

And as we also predicted two weeks ago, it was only a matter of time before Ukraine’s people – the vast majority of whom are innocent pawns in a vast game of realpolitik between the west and east – finally got angry and demanded some answers, if not heads. That time came earlier today when as Interfax.ua reported “a Kyiv-based court has instructed Kyiv prosecutors to bring an action against National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) Governor Valeriya Gontareva on charges of abuse of power or misuse of office to obtain illegal profit, the Vesti newspaper reported on Tuesday.”

According to Interfax, “This decision was taken by Kyiv’s Pechersk district court on December 1 after it had examined case No. 757/33660/14. It ordered the Kyiv prosecutor’s office to launch an investigation and include it in the register of pre-trial investigations,” the newspaper reported.

Gontareva is charged with abuse of power or misuse of office under Article 364 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

The plaintiff is lawyer Rostyslav Kravets, the newspaper said. He confirmed this information in his post on Facebook, saying that the decision was taken by the court at the third attempt, and in November 2014, the prosecutors declined to bring an action to meet his claim.

The charges against the chief banker involve foreign currency interventions by the Central Bank in August 2014: On August 5 the NBU bought U.S. dollars on the interbank forex market for UAH 11.93 per U.S. dollar and sold them for UAH 12.26 per U.S. dollar. During the same week, on August 8, it traded in foreign currency at a higher rate: UAH 12.45-12.6 per U.S. dollar. First it sold $69 million on the interbank forex market at a lower rate, and some days later it bought $35 million at a more favorable price.

As a result of these transactions, the NBU lost 19 kopecks per U.S. dollar, Kravets said.

Kravets claims that by acting so, Gontareva “has intentionally committed an extremely unfavorable transaction for the gold and forex reserves of Ukraine, despite the fact that under Ukraine’s Constitution it is the Central Bank that is in charge of maintaining the country’s gold reserves.”

* * *

That, and of course, there is also that as a result of central bank “transactions” the Ukraine central bank is now essentially gold-free, which per Gontareva’s recent appearance, has just 1% of total reserves in the form of the yellow metal.

And while it remains to be seen if this will be the spark that lights the counter-revolution (after all it took Egypt not less than a year to turn against the puppet regime dumped upon it by the CIA and the US State Department) others are already sensing which way the wind is blowing. As Bloomberg reported moments ago, another central banker, Olena Shcherbakova who is head of the monetary policy department at the Ukrainian central bank, said she is resigning. When reaced by phone she stated that she “has the right to step down,” without giving reason for decision.

She sure does, although we doubt even a former Goldman Sachs partner would be willing to replace her, as the realization among the Ukraine people finally seeps through that they were thoroughly betrayed by the same people who promised they would fix the country following the February presidential coup.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1yfdfP8 Tyler Durden

All About Debase: Not

Megan Trainor tells us it is “All About the Base”.  It seems like many reporters and analysts may be mistaking her lyrics as it is all about debase, as in currency wars.

The latest surge of currency war stories follow the unexpected decision by the Bank of Japan to dramatically increase its Qualitative and Quantitative Easing at the end of October.  It was  the same week that the Federal Reserve announced the end of its asset purchase operations.   Since the BOJ’s decision, the yen has depreciated by 8.3%. 

There has been little push back from the international community.  Nothing from the G20, the G7 or the US Treasury.   Even South Korean rhetoric has been fairly circumspect.  By  a unanimous decision, the central bank left rates on hold a couple weeks after the BOJ’s move.  The minutes of the South Korean central bank showed one member warning that concerns about the weak yen and deflation are exaggerated.  Another recognized that the impact of yen’s depreciation on Korea has been limited.

South Korea did cut rates in October, but this was before the Bank of Japan’s move.  After denying the need to provide broad economic support, the PBOC cut the one-year deposit rate for the first time in two years.  Although the move surprised many investors, there was little if any doubt that the PBOC was motivated by domestic issues, including softening inflation and falling house prices.

Like China, monetary policy developments in emerging Asia is driven primarily by domestic variables.  Several countries, like Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and India were in a tightening mode, but are now seen on hold.  Taiwan and Singapore have been on hold for an extended period.  When the monetary stance changes, it will be because of domestic price pressures and the growth outlook.

Some observers are worried about a repeat of the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis.  They argue that that crisis was precipitated by the depreciation of the yen.  At the time, many Asian countries had dollar liabilities and yen receivables.  This mismatch is not nearly as pronounced now.  The reason is that rise of China.  China is the largest trading partner of most of emerging Asia.  Ironically, the close link of the yuan to the US dollar serves to minimize the volatility of the region’s currency mismatch.

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, the International business editor at The Telegraph recognizes that the launch the BOJ’s aggressive monetary policy experiment did not trigger a currency war, despite many claiming otherwise because the yen was significantly over-valued.  This is not the case anymore, which is why he is worried that “Japan risks Asian currency war with fresh QE blitz”.

Indeed, the OECD’s measure of purchasing power parity shows the yen to be now under-valued by 14.5% against the US dollar.  It is the most under-valued of the major currencies.    On the eve of Abe’s election two years ago, the OECD estimated the yen was about 23% over-valued.  By the OECD’s reckoning, the yen is the most under-valued in nearly 30 years. 

This may seem to help explain why the launching of QQE in April 2012 did not spark a currency war, but it does shed light on why there has been little or no resistance to the BOJ’s latest efforts.  Could it be that Japanese exports in volume terms are roughly flat?  Could it be that Japanese businesses are not taking advantage of the weak yen to boost market share in foreign markets?

Many observers seem to confuse means with ends.  The goal is not a weaker currency to boost exports. The goal is to stimulate the economy and arrest deflation.  It is not a race to debase, but an effort to provide monetary support for an economy that has reached the zero bound, and one in which fiscal policy is largely exhausted (Japan’s debt is over 230% of GDP).  This was one of the concerns that Moody’s expressed when it cut Japan’s debt rate to A1, which is below the rating agencies assessment of China. 

Countries have to be free to pursue the monetary policy that is required by its domestic economy without being accused of starting a currency war.      Many countries face slow growth and weak price pressures.  They could seek to drive their currencies lower.   This could be a zero-sum exercise if it results in simply taking the aggregate demand from its trade partners.  Alternatively, countries can respond by stimulating their own domestic demand via monetary and fiscal policies and structural reforms that boost potential growth.

Megan Trainor had it right.  It is all about the base.  Not debase.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1ybWQas Marc To Market

Five complete lies about America’s new $18 trillion debt level

US 18 trillion debt Five complete lies about Americas new $18 trillion debt level

December 2, 2014
Santiago, Chile

On October 22, 1981, the government of the United States of America accumulated an astounding $1 TRILLION in debt.

At that point, it had taken the country 74,984 days (more than 205 years) to accumulate its first trillion in debt.

It would take less than five years to accumulate its second trillion.

And as the US government just hit $18 trillion in debt on Friday afternoon, it has taken a measly 403 days to accumulate its most recent trillion.

There’s so much misinformation and propaganda about this; let’s examine some of the biggest lies out there about the US debt:

1) “They can get it under control.”

What a massive lie. Politicians have been saying for decades that they’re going to cut spending and get the debt under control.

FACT: The last time the US debt actually decreased from one fiscal year to the next was back in 1957 during the EISENHOWER administration.

FACT: For the last several years, the US government has been spending roughly 90% of its ENTIRE tax revenue just to pay for mandatory entitlement programs and interest on the debt.

This leaves almost nothing for practically everything else we think of as government.

2) “The debt doesn’t matter because we owe it to ourselves.”

This is probably the biggest lie of all. Two of the Social Security trust funds alone (OASI and DI) own $2.72 trillion of US debt.

The federal government owes this money to current and future beneficiaries of those trust funds, i.e. EVERY SINGLE US CITIZEN ALIVE.

I fail to see the silver lining here. How is it somehow ‘better’ if the government defaults on its citizens as opposed to, say, banks?

3) “They can always ‘selectively default’ on the debt”

Another lie. People think that the US government can pick and choose who it pays.

They could make a bing stink about China, for example, and then choose to default on the $2 trillion in debt that’s owed to the Chinese.

Nice try. But this would rock global financial markets and destroy whatever tiny shred of credibility the US still has.

Others have suggested that the government could selectively default on the Federal Reserve (which owns $2.46 trillion of US debt).

Again, possible. But given that the Fed (the issuer of the US dollar) would become immediately insolvent, the resulting currency crisis would be completely disastrous.

4) “It’s the NET debt that’s important”

Analysts often pay attention to a country’s “net debt” instead of its gross debt. If you have a million bucks in debt, and a million bucks in cash, then your ‘net debt’ is zero. It washes out.

Problem is, the US government doesn’t have any cash. The Treasury Department opened its business day on Friday morning with just $71.9 billion in cash, or just 0.39% of its total debt level.

Apple has more money than that.

5) “They can fix it by raising taxes”

No they can’t. Just look at the numbers. Since the end of World War II, US government tax revenue has consistently been roughly 17% of GDP.

They can raise tax rates, but it doesn’t move the needle in terms of revenue as a percentage of GDP.

In other words, the government’s ‘slice of the pie’ is pretty consistent.

You’d think with this obvious data that, rather than try to increase tax rates (ineffective), they’d do everything they can to help make a bigger pie.

Or better yet, just leave everyone the hell alone so we’re free to bake as much as we can.

But no. They have to regulate every aspect of people’s existence: How you are allowed to educate your children. What you can/cannot put in your body. How much interest you are entitled to receive on your savings.

All of this costs time, money, and efficiency. So do never-ending wars. The bombs. The drones. The airstrikes.

This isn’t about any single person or President. The problem is with the system itself.

History shows that every leading superpower from the past almost invariably fell to the same fate.

Great powers often feel that their wealth and success entitles them to spend recklessly and wage endless, arrogant wars. The Romans. The Ottoman Empire. The British.

History may not repeat but it certainly rhymes. And the lesson here is very clear: debt weakens a nation. It weakens a society.

Generations that will not even be born for decades will inherit these debts by complete accident of birth.

And the people in charge of the system have backed themselves into a corner where there is no way out other than to default– either on their creditors (creating a global financial crisis), the central bank (creating a currency crisis), or on the citizens themselves (creating an epic social crisis).

Bottom line: this is not a consequence-free environment. And while you can’t fix the debt problem, you can certainly reduce your own exposure to what happens next.

from SOVEREIGN MAN http://ift.tt/1yfiAG1
via IFTTT

The Abenomics Devastation: Japanese Real Wages Decline For Record 16 Consecutive Months

Those seeking proof that Abenomics is working are advised to look elsewhere.

Overnight Japan released its latest, October, wage data, which showed that total cash wages rose 0.5% yoy, slightly slowing from the 0.7% growth recorded in September. As the chart below shows, Nominal wages have been slowing down from the peak in July when the figure was boosted to +2.4% on summer bonus payments. Overtime pay grew +0.4% yoy (September: +1.9%), slowing from the peak recorded in April (+6.0%) on a slowdown in economic activities. The figure contributed to overall wages by only +0.03 pp.

Some more details from Goldman: “Basic wages rose 0.4% yoy in October, unchanged from September. The effect of the shunto spring wage hike seems to be fully reflected into base wage growth and settling at a stable growth around 0.5%. However, with overtime pay near zero, the 0.4% increase in basic wages virtually determines the overall wage growth during non-bonus months. We also note that preliminary basic wages tend to be revised down at the final stage.”

Looking at nominal wages by type of employment, regular employees saw a 0.6% yoy increase, significantly slowing down from +1.1% in September. Wage for part-timers turned negative at -0.3% (September: +0.5%). Part-timers saw a sharp fall in basic working hours (-1.6% yoy) and overtime hours (-6.9% yoy).

In other words, when Japan turns to wage controls some time in 2015, a move that is now essentially assured as Japan has gone all in on central planning, it will demand that corporations boost pay to part-timers first, and then force all corporations to hike wages across the board.

But as everyone knows, for the past 2 years nominal wages are just half the story. The reason is that courtesy of the crashing Yen, everything has to be converted into real terms to adjust for soaring inflation and exploding import prices. It is here that we find that for the 16th consecutive month, real wages continued to decline heavily.

Real wages (nominal wages less the CPI inflation) continued to register a large decline of 2.8% yoy, after falling 3.0% in September. Despite high one-time bonus payments, the much lower pace of increase in basic wages (around +0.5%, conceptually close to permanent income) relative to inflation rate, and the resulting large decline in real wages at normal times, is restricting consumer behavior.

And with Japan’s snap election in less than two weeks, Abe’s reign may be yet again prematurely interrupted if the local population decides it has had enough of being on the receiving end of the most cruel Keynesian experiment in recent history. As Bloomberg notes, “With the effect of the sales tax hike, I don’t see real wages rising in the financial year through April,” said Toru Suehiro, an economist at Mizuho Securities Co. “People will be asking themselves whether they feel better off, and there probably aren’t that many who think the economy has got better.”

Which is to be expected. After all we now know that the brain trust behind the latest Japanese push into outright lunacy, is none other than Paul Krugman. Is there any doubt that Japan is now an economic basket case, with an unsustainable demographic implosion to boot?




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vcILqY Tyler Durden

The Fed’s Dudley: Higher Rates Are Coming… There is No “Fed Equity Market Put”

The Fed’s reputation is on borrowed time.

 

Much of the so called “economic recovery” that began in 2009 has been based on the Fed’s credibility as a Central Bank to rein in the collapse.

 

However, at this point even the financial media has begun to realize that the Fed has elevated asset prices (stocks, homes, etc.) and nothing else. Incomes have not moved in line with stocks nor has GDP growth nor has the employment picture.

 

Put another way, everyone now realizes that the Fed has boosted stocks and don’t little else. This has lead some to accuse the Fed of targeting the markets rather than boosting the economy (see the recent wave of legislation meant to increase Congressional oversight of the Fed being introduced in Congress).

 

The Fed isn’t doing itself any favors in terms of defending its track record.

 

Enter Bill Dudley: former Goldman Sachs bank turned NY Fed President.

 

Dudley made a speech yesterday regarding the Fed’s policies. Early on he states that when the Fed starts raising rates, it will gauge the market’s reaction closely to see how the financial system adjusts,

 

First, when lift-off occurs, the pace of monetary policy normalization will depend, in part, on how financial market conditions react to the initial and subsequent tightening moves.  If the reaction is relatively large—think of the response of financial market conditions during the so-called “taper tantrum” during the spring and summer of 2013—then this would likely prompt a slower and more cautious approach….

 

A few minutes later, he claims the Fed doesn’t care about stocks or bond yields or other items… the very same “conditions” he claimed the Fed will pay close attention to just a few moments before…

 

Let me be clear, there is no Fed equity market put.  To put it another way, we do not care about the level of equity prices, or bond yields or credit spreads per se.  Instead, we focus on how financial market conditions influence the transmission of monetary policy to the real economy

 

http://ift.tt/1z9hYjy

 

Suffice to say, Dudley is aware that the Fed is now considered to be a stock market prop and nothing else. The fact he is trying to explicitly dissuade the markets of this belief says a lot about the Fed’s thinking on this topic (read: we need to distance ourselves from the markets).

 

Between this and Fed #2 Stanley Fischer’s statement that the Fed’s primary concern is on when and how to raise interest rates, stocks are on borrowed time. Not only will rates be rising in the next 12 months, but even the biggest stock cheerleader at the Fed (Dudley) is now trying to break the belief that the Fed is an “equity market put”

 

Stocks are on borrowed time. The next round of the Financial Crisis is approaching.

 

If you’ve yet to take action to prepare for the second round of the financial crisis, we offer a FREE investment report Financial Crisis "Round Two" Survival Guide that outlines easy, simple to follow strategies you can use to not only protect your portfolio from a market downturn, but actually produce profits.

 

You can pick up a FREE copy at:

 

http://ift.tt/1rPiWR3

 

 

Best Regards

 

Graham Summers

 

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vcIIeV Phoenix Capital Research

Inflation Watch: The Fed-Driven Spike In Shale Oil Costs, In 2 Simple Numbers

Wondering where the inflationary impact of The Fed’s massive monetary policy experiment is leaking out (aside from stock prices)… Look no further…

What happens when too much cheap money chases a limited asset? Just like housing, ‘cost’ of Shale Oil wells have become about the monthly nut, not the all-in as The Fed-fueled pump focuses everyone on the short-term gains (ignorant of long-term pains). As the following chart shows, this credit-fueled exuberance has inflated basic costs for US oil producers dramatically

 

 

…and with their costs of funding exploding higher, the vicious circle of higher costs and lower revenues for these levered firms is spinning faster and faster.

 

h/t @RudyHavenstein




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/12mBsqT Tyler Durden

The Morality and Legality of Debt Jubilee, Part I

 

Jeff Nielson for Sprott Money

 

 

Our nations (Western nations) are rapidly going bankrupt. This is not a suggestion or an assertion. It is a simple fact of arithmetic, for anyone capable of operating a calculator, and who can understand the concept of “compound interest”. Indeed, the bankruptcy of these already-insolvent regimes has only been delayed via permanently (fraudulently) keeping interest rates frozen at near-zero – to minimize their already gigantic interest payments.

 

 

The economic outcome here is as obvious as it is inevitable. After the mass-bankruptcy which will occur either tomorrow, next month, next year, or (improbably) next decade; there will be a gigantic “economic reset” of Western economies, and very possibly the entire global economy.

 

debt-jubilee

This simple, inevitable conclusion should not surprise any reader. It has happened many times in our civilized history. Indeed, it has happened with such regularity/frequency that we even have a name for this economic phenomenon: Debt Jubilee. The origins of Debt Jubilee go back to (literally) Biblical times, as our societies have been bankrupting themselves, and then “resetting” for well over 2,000 years.

 

 

Having established that there must be an economic reset ahead of us, and having observed that this is a regular occurrence in our societies/civilizations; all that remains to be dealt with is how the next Debt Jubilee should be administered. As Debt Jubilee translates literally to erasing our debts; the question boils down to this: should all debt (government/corporate/individual) be wiped away, or only partially erased?

 

 

Since this is ultimately a question of law, and we are still (supposedly) societies governed by the Rule of Law; the appropriate analysis here is a legal one. The legal principle upon which any Debt Jubilee must be based is known as “the doctrine of unjust enrichment”. It is an elementary doctrine, and thus requires no legal training or expertise to understand it.

 

 

The precise legal question to be decided here is a simple one: would the Debtors here (our governments, and us) be “unjustly enriched” if all our debts were totally/permanently erased? If we answer the first question affirmatively; then the doctrine of unjust enrichment requires that we consider a second question: are the Debt-Holders entitled to any legal remedy themselves, under a separate branch of our law known (appropriately) as Equity?

 

 

Here, again, the answer to the question is governed by a simple principle. In order for any person/entity to be entitled to any equitable remedy in our legal system, they must satisfy a stringent legal test: they must demonstrate themselves to have “clean hands”. Simply, in order for anyone to be entitled to a legal remedy in Equity (in this case, the Debt-Holders) they must prove that their own conduct has been above reproach.

 

 

With the facts set out, the issues identified, and the legal principles which must decide this matter explained; we are now ready to adjudicate our coming Debt Jubilee. Considering the issues in their proper order; we begin with the question: would it be “unjust” (would we be unjustly enriched?) if our debts/our governments debts were simply erased?

 

 

Regular readers should be familiar with the recent history concerning our governments’ massive debts. The $10’s of trillions of new debt piled atop these corrupt Western regimes over the past decade are (without exception) all the direct result of serial acts of fraud/extortion by the primary debt-holder here: the One Bank (i.e. the oligarchs of the Old World Order).

 

frozen-0-interest-rate

 

With respect to the fraud; where do we begin? This banking crime syndicate began by engaging in fraudulent misrepresentation. They assured our governments back in the 1990’s (as their/our “financial experts” and the financiers of this debt) that our governments could safely increase our debt levels dramatically, meaning the bankers had (supposedly) developed the “financial engineering” to permanently suppress the amount of interest paid on those debts.

 

 

It was (as we have seen) all lies. Our debts haven’t grown in an orderly, manageable manner, as the bankers promised they would. They have exploded exponentially, to the point where all these governments are completely/obviously insolvent, and mass-bankruptcy is only delayed by (as previously mentioned) even more fraud – the illegal suppression of interest rates.

 

 

Additional fraud comes in the form of one of the banksters’ favorite tools of crime from the derivatives market — the entirely unregulated, entirely illegal $1.5 quadrillion rigged casino, operated exclusively by this financial crime syndicate – “interest rate swaps”. This form of fraud involved the banksters tricking the leaders of our governments, and the administrators of most public institutions throughout the Western world to bet against the banksters themselves.

 

 

The bets they were making (involving $trillions more in fraud) were with respect to the direction of interest rates. Let me be more specific, so that readers fully understand the magnitude of the fraud, and the monumental stupidity of all these politicians and public officials. They were betting on the direction of interest rates against the same financial cabal which is capable of completely manipulating interest rates.

 

 

It would be just as foolish as betting on tomorrow’s weather – against someone with a “weather-control machine”. How could thousands of governments and public institutions all have been swindled by this same, grossly obvious fraud? Herd mentality. “Everyone” was doing it, so it had to be not only safe, butsmart.

 

 

Then there was/is the extortion. As part of its gigantic interest-rate swindle; it was necessary for the One Bank to “crash” all of our economies (and markets): the Crash of ’08. The crash was triggered in precisely the same way that this banking cabal has been manufacturing “panics” in our economies for 150 years. In economies which (thanks to the bankers themselves) now totally run on “credit” (i.e. debt); the One Bank simply cuts off all credit – suddenly and collectively, via its Big Bank tentacles.

 

 

The result is as devastating (and predictable) as cutting off the supply of sunlight to plants, or cutting off the supply of oxygen to humans. Our economies now (literally) ‘live on’ credit. Withhold that credit, and they crash every time.

 

 

After the One Bank triggered the Crash of ’08, came the extortion against our corrupt, cowardly governments: pay this cabal $10’s of trillions in blackmail money (spread over decades), or they would finish the economic destruction of Western regimes – i.e. “call-in our debts” (which are held by the One Bank), and drive all these insolvent governments into bankruptcy.

 

 

The tip-of-the-iceberg in this extortion were the direct, cash payments to these financial extortionists: what we now know (via the propaganda of our governments and the media) as the “bail-outs” of 2008/09. However, the vast majority of these $10’s of trillions in extortion (i.e. “bail-outs”) were hidden – and are rarely mentioned by the politicians, or the equally corrupt Corporate media.

 

 

They come in primarily two forms: massive, long-term “tax breaks”, so that this crime syndicate is not even required to pay taxes on the endless $billions which are the proceeds of its various criminal enterprises. Along with that are endless $trillions of “loss guarantees”. In other words; after the various frauds of this crime syndicate have reaped their illegal harvest, and imploded (as all frauds eventually do); we are committed to indemnifying the One Bank for any/all “losses” it suffers as it perpetrates its mega-billion and mega-trillion dollar crimes against our societies.

 

 

Why were the bail-outs ever supposedly necessary, in the first place? Because some of the Big Banks were (supposedly) on the verge of bankruptcy because of debts/obligations owing to other Big Banks.

 

 

But all of these Big Banks are tentacles of the One Bank: JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Barclays Bank, Deutsche Bank, Citigroup, Bank of America, et al. The “crisis” was imaginary. It was merely a gigantic paper-fraud orchestrated by the bankers. The blackmail, however, was/is only too real. And that was only the beginning of the extortion.

 

 

This financial crime syndicate then strong-armed the pathetic cowards who call themselves our “leaders” to declare the Big Bank tentacles of this crime syndicate (permanently) “too big to fail”. In other words; these traitorous cowards were permanently committing our governments (and thus ourselves) to pay any/allfuture extortion demanded by the One Bank.

 

 

Here it must be understood that no amount of financial carnage perpetrated by this crime syndicate over the short term could possibly be as injurious as agreeing to permanently pay massive extortion payments to the most-rapacious crime syndicate in the history of our species. Rather, our cowardly leaders agreed to the extortion simply to save their own jobs (and positions of privilege).

 

 

Had the banking crime syndicate driven all our governments collectively into bankruptcy; our Traitor Leaders would (at the very least) be thrown out of office. And if their treasonous crimes were uncovered by whatever regime succeeded them; they could easily rot in prison cells for the rest of their miserable lives.

 

 

Our futures (and our children’s futures) have all been permanently mortgaged to this financial crime syndicate solely so that our selfish, cowardly, treasonous leaders can protect their own interests. There can be absolutely no doubt that any/all of the additional debt and obligations which have been piled atop our governments over this period of time (and thus piled atop all of us) are doubly fraudulent.

 

 

They are fraudulent (in one, obvious sense) because they are the simple/obvious result of acts of fraud and financial extortion – and thus legally unenforceable. They are also fraudulent in the sense that our governments (our legal representatives) have been fraudulently misrepresenting these debts to us, and all the crime upon which they are based.

 

 

However, while most of our national debts are the direct product of fraud; we also had/have large historical debts. What about the original debt-loads accumulated by our governments, over roughly the last century? If we are going to erase all government debt; that debt must be considered as well.

 

 

Part II of this series will deal with that subject. Readers will be provided with a little ‘teaser’ of what is to come, via the words/thoughts of a political leader who lived at the time that our yokes of debt were first being fastened to our throats – Republican Congressman (and former prosecutor) Charles Lindbergh Sr. (from his superb book, The Economic Pinch). This is what Lindbergh had to say back in 1923 (p.110):

 

children-of-the-future

Our future and the future of our children have been doubly mortgaged by the wonderful profiteering schemes of the last eight years [1915-22], mortgaged on a larger scale than ever before. It is simply a larger installment of the great profiteering game, growing in its burden all the time and forcing us into greater and greater debt, debt that can never be paid under the present system of finance; but, on the contrary, will increase until by its own excesses it breaks down by forcing its own repudiation [i.e. Debt Jubilee]. It cannot much longer stand the strain imposed by its own plan. [emphasis mine]

 

 

Jeff Nielson for Sprott Money




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1yeXQhO Sprott Money

‘Central Bankers’ Say The Darndest Things – Bill Dudley Edition

Via Raul Ilargi Meijer's The Automatic Earth blog,

First, in the next episode of Kids Say The Darndest Things – oh wait, that was Cosby .. -, we have New York Fed head (rhymes with methhead) Bill Dudley. Dudley’s overall message is that the US economy is doing great, but it’s not actually doing great, and therefore a rate hike would be too early. Or something. Bloomberg has the prepared text of a speech he held today, and it’s hilarious. Look:

Fed’s Dudley Says Oil Price Decline Will Strengthen US Recovery

The sharp drop in oil prices will help boost consumer spending and underpin an economy that still requires patience before interest rates are increased, Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William C. Dudley said. “It is still premature to begin to raise interest rates,” Dudley said in the prepared text of a speech today at Bernard M. Baruch College in New York.

 

“When interest rates are at the zero lower bound, the risks of tightening a bit too early are likely to be considerably greater than the risks of tightening a bit too late.” Dudley expressed confidence that, although the U.S. economic recovery has shown signs in recent years of accelerating, only to slow again, “the likelihood of another disappointment has lessened.”

How is this possible? ‘The sharp drop in oil prices will help boost consumer spending’? I don’t understand that: Dudley is talking about money that would otherwise also have been spent, only on gas. There is no additional money, so where’s the boost?

Investors’ expectations for a Fed rate increase in mid-2015 are reasonable, he said, and the pace at which the central bank tightens will depend partly on financial-market conditions and the economy’s performance. Crude oil suffered its biggest drop in three years after OPEC signaled last week it will not reduce production. Lower energy costs “will lead to a significant rise in real income growth for households and should be a strong spur to consumer spending,” Dudley said.

 

The drop will especially help lower-income households, who are more likely to spend and not save the extra real income, he said.

Extra income? Real extra income, as opposed to unreal? How silly are we planning to make it, sir? Never mind, the fun thing is that Dudley defeats his own point. By saying that lower-income households are more likely to spend and not save the ‘extra real income’, he also says that others won’t spend it, and that of course means that the net effect on consumer spending will be down, not up.

He had another zinger, that the whole finance blogosphere will have a good laugh at:

[..] He also tried to disabuse investors of the notion that the Fed would, in times of sharp equity declines, ease monetary conditions, an idea known as the “Fed put.” “The expectation of such a put is dangerous because if investors believe it exists they will view the equity market as less risky,” Dudley said. That could cause investors to push equity markets higher, contributing to a bubble, he said. “Let me be clear, there is no Fed equity market put,” he said.

That’s in the category: ‘Read my lips’, ‘Mission Accomplished’ and ‘I did not have sex with that woman.’ I remain convinced that they’ll move rates up, and patsies like Dudley are being sent out to sow the seeds of confusion. Apart from that, this is just complete and bizarre nonsense. And that comes from someone with a very high post in the American financial world. At least a bit scary.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1yeXOqc Tyler Durden

Government Construction Spending Surges Most Since 2006

After 4 months of missed expectations, US Construction Spending rose 1.1% in October, beating the 0.6% expectations, and the highest MoM since May 2014. Great news… the recovery is back, right? Scratch barely below the surface of this algo-loving headline though and the unsustainable reality peaks out. US Government construction spending spiked 19.3% in October, the most since 2006… seems like we need to dig some holes and fill them in again…

Yay! Headline construction spending rose more than expected….

 

Driven by a huge spike in government construction spending…

 

And stocks love it!!

 

Charts: Bloomberg




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1yHKyu3 Tyler Durden