Did the Media Miss the Eric Swalwell Story?


Eric Swalwell | JOSÉ LUIS VILLEGAS/TNS/Newscom

Last week, former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D–Calif.) was a high-profile member of Congress (the sort of anti-Trump #Resistance figure who appeared regularly on MSNOW) and the leading Democratic candidate to be the next governor of California. Today, he’s a disgraced ex-candidate and ex-congressman.

Swalwell has quit both jobs following numerous sexual misconduct claims reported on by the San Francisco Chronicle and also CNN. Five women have alleged varying levels of improper behavior: The most serious accusation, made by Lonna Drewes, involves rape. She says that Swalwell lured her to his hotel room and choked her while sexually assaulting her. For his part, Swalwell has tacitly confessed to infidelity but denies that he forced himself on anyone.

“These accusations of sexual assault are flat false,” he said. “I will fight them with everything I have.”

Given all this, Swalwell’s resignation seems appropriate, though I would remind everyone that it is difficult to parse the truth of sexual misconduct accusations that surface years after the fact. Alleged victims deserve to be heard and respected, not automatically believed. Numerous men in politics have been accused of long-ago misdeeds that are impossible to properly vet and therefore mostly ignored—including former President Joe Biden, whose campaign was hardly derailed by an accusation from ex-staffer Tara Reade 30 years after the fact.

Moreover, Swalwell’s exit from Congress was prompted by the fact that his colleagues had planned to expel him over the allegations. While it’s hardly a tragedy when politicians lose their jobs (I’m all in favor of throw the bums out!), I am very reluctant to endorse the idea that a congressman should be tossed over unproven accusations contrary to basic norms of fairness and due process. Swalwell’s constituents chose him to be their guy, and I generally think that it’s the voters’ responsibility to decide who represents them in Congress, not other legislators.

I say that as someone who finds Swalwell a fairly ridiculous and gullible political figure and a terrible choice for governor of California. The good news for Democrats is that they have numerous other choices: far-left billionaire Tom Steyer, former Rep. Katie Porter (who is herself accused of some nasty behavior), the comparatively moderate San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, and others. The bad news for Democrats is that currently the two highest polling candidates are both Republicans, which could actually result in the Democrats getting shut out of the general election. Additional consolidation is clearly necessary.

Which brings me to my next question, and one I’ve seen various conservatives asking on social media this week: Why now? At first blush, it does seem rather strange that the accusations against Swalwell would take so long to come out. CNN’s Brian Stelter described the Swalwell story as a “testament to the power of investigative reporting,” and there’s some truth to that. The Chronicle and CNN reporters did a great job, but still. Swalwell has been a major national Democratic figure for years. He even ran for president in 2020!

Additionally, he’s been a constant fixture on progressive and mainstream media programs. Per usual, now that the story is out there, one encounters all sorts of Democratic staffers, politicos, and media figures whispering that they had heard the gossip about him for years. It takes a lot of work for a media reporter to hit publish on a story that contains such weighty accusations, but I find it strange that no one tried back in 2020, particularly with #MeToo still being a major topic of interest for the media at the time.

That said, conservatives inclined to complain about this might consider whether their own media institutions also missed the story. After all, there was nothing stopping them from digging into it, but that means investing in real reporting talent, not just clickbait and hot takes.


This Week on Free Media

I discuss Swalwell’s exit with Amber Duke. Also, on Freed Up, Christian Britschgi challenges me to guess: death metal album or military operation? Play along!


Worth Watching

I finished Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, which I did not enjoy, and have returned to Agatha Christie’s Miss Marple series. Next up: Pocketful of Rye.

The post Did the Media Miss the Eric Swalwell Story? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/XZQ2u3g
via IFTTT

Pete Hegseth’s Pulp Fiction Prayer Isn’t the First Time He’s Used Religion To Justify Illegal War in Iran


Hegseth-Pulp-Fiction-4-16 | Illustration: Adani Samat

During a worship service at the Pentagon on Wednesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth read a prayer to bless the government’s war efforts in Iran, which “was shared to him by the lead planner” of the Combat Search and Rescue operation (CSAR) that “rescued two Air Force crew members shot down over Iran,” reports USA Today

“The path of the downed aviator is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men,” Hegseth read. “Blessed is he who, in the name of camaraderie and duty, shepherd the lost through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother’s keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to capture and destroy my brother. And you will know my call sign is Sandy One when I lay my vengeance upon thee, and amen.”

The prayer, known as CSAR 25:17, is “meant to reflect Ezekiel 25:17,” according to Hegseth. This passage foretells a “great vengeance” against ancient Israel’s enemies for taking “revenge with malice in their hearts” against the nation. While CSAR 25:17 is supposedly meant to “reflect” scripture, it reads closer to Samuel L. Jackson’s monologic prayer from Pulp Fiction. In it, Jackson’s hitman character declares that “the path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men” and “you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you,” before killing a guy who had been stealing from his boss.   

Hegseth’s Wednesday prayer was not the first time he has used scripture or the Christian faith out of context to support the administration’s illegal war. Last month, in the first Pentagon worship service since the war started, Hegseth used a mix of Bible verses and metaphors to ask God to “break the teeth” of the Iranian oppressors and give the United States success in its efforts. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has said that God supports the U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran because “God wants to see people taken care of.” Comments like these led Pope Leo XIV on Thursday to condemn “a handful of tyrants” who “manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military…and political gain.”

Indeed, the Trump world has time and again exploited the faith of the president’s supporters to further a political agenda that expands the state’s power and perpetuates civil liberties violations. In February 2025, the president signed an executive order that established a federal task force to “eradicate anti-Christian bias” in the U.S., which the Interfaith Alliance recently warned will “weaponize a narrow understanding of religious freedom to legitimize discrimination against marginalized groups,” including the LGBT community. 

After the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti at the hands of federal agents earlier this year, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) defended the administration’s deportation campaign on Facebook by citing Romans 13, where apostle Paul directs Christians to submit to “governing authorities.” The post received backlash from the faith community, including from Benjamin Cremer, a pastor who writes about the intersection of politics and Christianity, who called Johnson’s interpretation of the scripture “to sanctify a vision of government authority that demands submission while refusing accountability….not a faithful reading of the text.”

In Oklahoma, Christian nationalist politicians have tried to force their beliefs by proposing strict penalties on pornography and mandating Bibles—notably, Trump-endorsed Bibles—in classrooms. Louisiana, meanwhile, recently saw its law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in classrooms struck down in court and later allowed to temporarily proceed in some districts while the legal battle continues.

Hegseth may very well believe that the U.S. is fighting a holy war in Iran and that God is on his side. But as the Trump administration has repeatedly shown, when politicians use faith to justify expansions of the state and illiberal policies, Americans ought to be skeptical of their motivations and the movement that brought them into power.

The post Pete Hegseth's <i>Pulp Fiction</i> Prayer Isn't the First Time He's Used Religion To Justify Illegal War in Iran appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/u3WIEqH
via IFTTT

Major Advertising Agencies Settle Media Censorship Lawsuit With FTC

Major Advertising Agencies Settle Media Censorship Lawsuit With FTC

Authored by Jacki Thrapp via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and eight states secured a settlement on April 15 that will prevent three major advertising agencies from engaging in unlawful media censorship.

An American flag flies at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) headquarters in Washington on Nov. 24, 2024. Benoit Tessier/File Photo/Reuters

The defendants Dentsu US, Inc., GroupM Worldwide LLC (doing business as WPP Media), and Publicis, Inc. will no longer enter into deals that require them to restrict working with certain clients, according to the settlement.

“A coordinated group of woke, powerful individuals attempted to suppress that Constitutional right by manipulating ad agencies into sabotaging the reach, revenue, and credibility of conservative voices,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement released on April 15.

The plaintiffs – including Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia – alleged that censorship deals between ad agencies and companies had been happening in the background during the past decade, which limited rising voices in the alternative and online media space.

The lawsuit accused some of the largest ad agencies of establishing brand-safety agreements that labeled content creators as “misinformation,” making them unable to receive ad revenue.

The alleged brand-safety standards were part of a campaign to demonetize prominent figures in the conservative space such as Glenn Beck, Steve Bannon, and the late Charlie Kirk, according to court documents reviewed by the Epoch Times.

The campaign allegedly attempted to censor and suppress content from Fox News Channel and X, formerly Twitter.

This is a deeply disturbing violation of antitrust laws and our Constitution,” Paxton added.

“This was an egregious attempt to control public opinion and silence those who speak out against the liberal elites and powerful corporations. I will continue to lead the fight against viewpoint suppression and protect the speech of Americans from corrupt manipulation.”

As part of the settlement, defendants also agreed to have a court-ordered monitor to make sure agencies are sticking with the agreement and no longer censoring political viewpoints.

The defendants agreed not to enter into or enforce any deal that would limit their advertising spending on political or ideological viewpoints or DEI commitments.

The ad agencies’ brand-safety conspiracy turned competition in the market for ad-buying services on its head,” FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said in a statement on Wednesday.

​Ferguson added, “this unlawful collusion not only damaged our marketplace, but also distorted the marketplace of ideas by discriminating against speech and ideas that fell below the unlawfully agreed-upon floor.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/16/2026 – 15:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/eMCO0fc Tyler Durden

Did the Media Miss the Eric Swalwell Story?


Eric Swalwell | JOSÉ LUIS VILLEGAS/TNS/Newscom

Last week, former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D–Calif.) was a high-profile member of Congress (the sort of anti-Trump #Resistance figure who appeared regularly on MSNOW) and the leading Democratic candidate to be the next governor of California. Today, he’s a disgraced ex-candidate and ex-congressman.

Swalwell has quit both jobs following numerous sexual misconduct claims reported on by the San Francisco Chronicle and also CNN. Five women have alleged varying levels of improper behavior: The most serious accusation, made by Lonna Drewes, involves rape. She says that Swalwell lured her to his hotel room and choked her while sexually assaulting her. For his part, Swalwell has tacitly confessed to infidelity but denies that he forced himself on anyone.

“These accusations of sexual assault are flat false,” he said. “I will fight them with everything I have.”

Given all this, Swalwell’s resignation seems appropriate, though I would remind everyone that it is difficult to parse the truth of sexual misconduct accusations that surface years after the fact. Alleged victims deserve to be heard and respected, not automatically believed. Numerous men in politics have been accused of long-ago misdeeds that are impossible to properly vet and therefore mostly ignored—including former President Joe Biden, whose campaign was hardly derailed by an accusation from ex-staffer Tara Reade 30 years after the fact.

Moreover, Swalwell’s exit from Congress was prompted by the fact that his colleagues had planned to expel him over the allegations. While it’s hardly a tragedy when politicians lose their jobs (I’m all in favor of throw the bums out!), I am very reluctant to endorse the idea that a congressman should be tossed over unproven accusations contrary to basic norms of fairness and due process. Swalwell’s constituents chose him to be their guy, and I generally think that it’s the voters’ responsibility to decide who represents them in Congress, not other legislators.

I say that as someone who finds Swalwell a fairly ridiculous and gullible political figure and a terrible choice for governor of California. The good news for Democrats is that they have numerous other choices: far-left billionaire Tom Steyer, former Rep. Katie Porter (who is herself accused of some nasty behavior), the comparatively moderate San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, and others. The bad news for Democrats is that currently the two highest polling candidates are both Republicans, which could actually result in the Democrats getting shut out of the general election. Additional consolidation is clearly necessary.

Which brings me to my next question, and one I’ve seen various conservatives asking on social media this week: Why now? At first blush, it does seem rather strange that the accusations against Swalwell would take so long to come out. CNN’s Brian Stelter described the Swalwell story as a “testament to the power of investigative reporting,” and there’s some truth to that. The Chronicle and CNN reporters did a great job, but still. Swalwell has been a major national Democratic figure for years. He even ran for president in 2020!

Additionally, he’s been a constant fixture on progressive and mainstream media programs. Per usual, now that the story is out there, one encounters all sorts of Democratic staffers, politicos, and media figures whispering that they had heard the gossip about him for years. It takes a lot of work for a media reporter to hit publish on a story that contains such weighty accusations, but I find it strange that no one tried back in 2020, particularly with #MeToo still being a major topic of interest for the media at the time.

That said, conservatives inclined to complain about this might consider whether their own media institutions also missed the story. After all, there was nothing stopping them from digging into it, but that means investing in real reporting talent, not just clickbait and hot takes.


This Week on Free Media

I discuss Swalwell’s exit with Amber Duke. Also, on Freed Up, Christian Britschgi challenges me to guess: death metal album or military operation? Play along!


Worth Watching

I finished Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, which I did not enjoy, and have returned to Agatha Christie’s Miss Marple series. Next up: Pocketful of Rye.

The post Did the Media Miss the Eric Swalwell Story? appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/XZQ2u3g
via IFTTT

Pete Hegseth’s Pulp Fiction Prayer Isn’t the First Time He’s Used Religion To Justify Illegal War in Iran


Hegseth-Pulp-Fiction-4-16 | Illustration: Adani Samat

During a worship service at the Pentagon on Wednesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth read a prayer to bless the government’s war efforts in Iran, which “was shared to him by the lead planner” of the Combat Search and Rescue operation (CSAR) that “rescued two Air Force crew members shot down over Iran,” reports USA Today

“The path of the downed aviator is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men,” Hegseth read. “Blessed is he who, in the name of camaraderie and duty, shepherd the lost through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother’s keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to capture and destroy my brother. And you will know my call sign is Sandy One when I lay my vengeance upon thee, and amen.”

The prayer, known as CSAR 25:17, is “meant to reflect Ezekiel 25:17,” according to Hegseth. This passage foretells a “great vengeance” against ancient Israel’s enemies for taking “revenge with malice in their hearts” against the nation. While CSAR 25:17 is supposedly meant to “reflect” scripture, it reads closer to Samuel L. Jackson’s monologic prayer from Pulp Fiction. In it, Jackson’s hitman character declares that “the path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men” and “you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you,” before killing a guy who had been stealing from his boss.   

Hegseth’s Wednesday prayer was not the first time he has used scripture or the Christian faith out of context to support the administration’s illegal war. Last month, in the first Pentagon worship service since the war started, Hegseth used a mix of Bible verses and metaphors to ask God to “break the teeth” of the Iranian oppressors and give the United States success in its efforts. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has said that God supports the U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran because “God wants to see people taken care of.” Comments like these led Pope Leo XIV on Thursday to condemn “a handful of tyrants” who “manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military…and political gain.”

Indeed, the Trump world has time and again exploited the faith of the president’s supporters to further a political agenda that expands the state’s power and perpetuates civil liberties violations. In February 2025, the president signed an executive order that established a federal task force to “eradicate anti-Christian bias” in the U.S., which the Interfaith Alliance recently warned will “weaponize a narrow understanding of religious freedom to legitimize discrimination against marginalized groups,” including the LGBT community. 

After the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti at the hands of federal agents earlier this year, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) defended the administration’s deportation campaign on Facebook by citing Romans 13, where apostle Paul directs Christians to submit to “governing authorities.” The post received backlash from the faith community, including from Benjamin Cremer, a pastor who writes about the intersection of politics and Christianity, who called Johnson’s interpretation of the scripture “to sanctify a vision of government authority that demands submission while refusing accountability….not a faithful reading of the text.”

In Oklahoma, Christian nationalist politicians have tried to force their beliefs by proposing strict penalties on pornography and mandating Bibles—notably, Trump-endorsed Bibles—in classrooms. Louisiana, meanwhile, recently saw its law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in classrooms struck down in court and later allowed to temporarily proceed in some districts while the legal battle continues.

Hegseth may very well believe that the U.S. is fighting a holy war in Iran and that God is on his side. But as the Trump administration has repeatedly shown, when politicians use faith to justify expansions of the state and illiberal policies, Americans ought to be skeptical of their motivations and the movement that brought them into power.

The post Pete Hegseth's <i>Pulp Fiction</i> Prayer Isn't the First Time He's Used Religion To Justify Illegal War in Iran appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/u3WIEqH
via IFTTT

Taiwan Semi Slides Despite Record Results In Warning Sign For Chip Companies

Taiwan Semi Slides Despite Record Results In Warning Sign For Chip Companies

Taiwanese chip giant, Taiwan Semiconductor Manfuacturing Co, said Thursday its net profit surged to a fresh record in the first quarter, fueled by the global artificial intelligence race despite the war in the Middle East. Massive demand for AI hardware means business is booming for TSMC — the biggest contract maker of microchips used in everything from Apple phones to Nvidia processors.

TSMC’s net profit for the first three months of the year jumped 58.3% YoY to NT$572.5 billion ($18 billion), beating analyst estimates of NT$540.20 billion as governments and tech giants continue to pour huge sums into building data centers that can train and run AI tools such as chatbots, image generators and agents that can execute tasks. A weaker Taiwanese dollar had also boosted the firm’s revenues from overseas sales: the company said net revenue rose 35.1% YoY to a record NT$1.13 trillion. Gross margin was 66.2% in the first quarter, further increased from a record 62.3% last quarter.

Here is the full Q1 breakdown:

  • Sales NT$1.13 trillion, +35% y/y, estimate NT$1.12 trillion
  • Net income NT$572.5 billion, +58% y/y, estimate NT$542.38 billion
  • Gross margin 66.2% vs. 62.3% q/q, estimate 64.5%
  • Operating profit NT$658.97 billion, +62% y/y, estimate NT$623.82 billion
  • Operating margin 58.1% vs. 54% q/q, estimate 55.6%

While overall earnings were stellar, largely thanks to relentless AI chip demand, one weak point was smartphone revenue, which fell 11% compared to the previous quarter as the industry faces an ongoing memory shortage.

“The recent situation in the Middle East… brings further macroeconomic uncertainties, as such we are being prudent in our business planning,” TSMC chairman CC Wei said.  TSMC CFO Wendell Huang said the company did not expect the war to impact its supply of key chipmaking materials such as helium and hydrogen in the near term, despite mounting fears that the collapse in Qatar helium exports would wreak havoc on global chip production.

“We source from multiple suppliers in different regions, and we have prepared safety stock inventory on hand,” Huang told an earnings call, adding that energy supplies were also sufficient to continue operations as normal for now.

TSMC said its revenue for the April-June quarter will reach another record of between $39 billion and $40.2 billion, which represents 32% year-over-year growth at the midpoint. Gross margin is expected to be between 65.5% to 67.5%. Commenting on the forecast, Bloomberg said that “TSMC’s 2Q gross-margin guide above 1Q’s record suggests rising chemical and gas costs tied to Middle East disruption aren’t enough to derail the company’s structural margin reset”

That said, TSMC warned the surging price of gas and chipmaking chemicals could weigh on the company’s profitability and the global economy, while increasing component costs, including for memory chips, could affect the price-sensitive consumer market.

The results are in line with those of leading memory chipmakers, including Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix and Micron Technology, all of which have benefited from the global AI infrastructure boom. Samsung earlier this month flagged preliminary first-quarter operating profit surging 755% year on year, driven by an unprecedented memory shortage. Micron’s gross margin reached 74% in the fiscal quarter ending February 2026 and is expected to rise further to around 81% in the current quarter, underscoring the strength of demand.

A note from UBS analysts had predicted strong quarterly results for TSMC but warned that consumer demand was weakening as a result of higher prices caused by a global memory chip shortage that is a side-effect of the AI boom. “Cloud AI demand continues to strengthen, but we think supply constraints will limit meaningful upside for TSMC this year,” the UBS team said. “Middle East tensions add a layer of macro uncertainty, but AI spend should stay insulated, barring a protracted conflict.”

TSMC’s good news was bad news for  PC manufacturers, who are facing a rare double-whammy: TSMC’s foundry price hikes are converging with memory cost inflation, creating a cost squeeze that’s already forcing retail price increases. The math is straightforward-chips cost more to make, and memory modules are pricier to buy-and the result is a fundamental upward pressure on every PC built.

TSMC’s 2026 price adjustments target the advanced nodes that power premium laptops and desktops. The company notified clients that prices for sub-3nm processes will rise 3% to 10% starting January 1, 2026, with the exact increase depending on the node 3%-10% by node. TSMC currently sells 3nm wafers for approximately $20,000 each, and 2nm wafers will exceed $30,000 when mass production begins 3nm at ~$20,000, 2nm above $30,000. These are the chips that go into flagship devices, and the cost differential is material. For context, TSMC’s Arizona facility, which is now producing 4nm chips, costs 5-20% more to operate than Taiwan-based manufacturing, a factor baked into the pricing strategy Arizona operations 5-20% more expensive.

The memory side of the equation is equally aggressive. DRAM and NAND flash prices have been climbing as suppliers tighten contract terms and inventories normalize. Asus, one of the world’s largest PC vendors, responded in early January 2026 by implementing price increases of 15% to 20% on selected notebook and desktop models Asus price increases 15-20%. The company explicitly cited “RAM and storage cost pressure” as the driver, linking the shift directly to supplier pricing rather than logistics or labor Asus attributed increases to memory costs. Asus targeted specific consumer and commercial models-but the effect was immediate: Taiwan retailers began raising prices on competing brands’ systems to preserve their own margins retailers raised prices on rival brands.

* * * 

TSMC is also planning record capital spending of up to $56 billion in 2026, part of a broader push by Asia’s chip industry that could total at least $136 billion. ASE Technology Holding, the world’s largest chip-packaging and testing provider, updated its guidance and said investment this year will exceed earlier forecasts.

“We expect AI to continue fueling growth for TSMC despite weak non-AI demand,” said Mark Li, veteran semiconductor analyst with Bernstein Research. “Fortunately for TSMC, we see no impact to its business as the capacity released by non-AI customers will be quickly filled by AI customers who could not find sufficient capacity before.”

TSMC Chairman and CEO C.C. Wei also commented for the first time on Tesla and Intel’s collaboration on Terafab advanced chipmaking facilities in the U.S. and on Intel’s push into the contract chipmaking business and advanced chip packaging. Recently Elon Musk says his company is embarking on its own in-house chip business because capacity from its chip suppliers, including TSMC, Samsung and SK Hynix, is insufficient to meet its needs. 

“Actually both Intel and Tesla are TSMC customers, but they are [also] our competitors. We view Intel as a formidable competitor, and do not underestimate them,” Wei said. “But I will say that there are no shortcuts. The fundamental rule of the foundry never changes. We need technology, leadership, manufacturing excellence and customer trust, which has been mentioned by Jensen [Huang]” — Wei said, thanking the Nvidia CEO for his words. 

Wei said it takes two to three years to build a new chip plant and another one to two years to ramp it up. TSMC, he added, is also building new fabs to satisfy its customers. “The capacity is very tight and we are working hard to make sure we can meet customer demand.”

Despite TSMC’s record Q1 results, US-listed shares are down 2.3% (having risen nearly 19% off a recent low). The failure of either TSMC or European chip giant ASML (which sasnk 3% on concerns over shrinking sales to China and sky-high expectations from investors) to catch a tailwind from positive reports could be a bellwether for the wider chip industry as earnings season rolls on.

It is also the latest example of how astronomical expectations have weighed on chipmaker stocks. Last quarter, Nvidia’s blowout fourth-quarter earnings report was met with a 5% sell-off.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/16/2026 – 14:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/4MqQayi Tyler Durden

Trump Urges Extending Foreign Surveillance Program As Some Lawmakers Push For US Privacy Protections

Trump Urges Extending Foreign Surveillance Program As Some Lawmakers Push For US Privacy Protections

Via Headline USA,

Congress is set to take up the reauthorization of a divisive program that lets U.S. spy agencies pore over foreigners’ calls, texts and emails, with supporters like President Donald Trump saying it has saved lives while critics point to longstanding concerns about warrantless surveillance of Americans.

(AP Illustration/Peter Hamlin)

A key provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits the CIA, National Security Agency, FBI and other agencies to collect and analyze vast amounts of overseas communications without a warrant. It incidentally sweeps up the conversations of any Americans who interact with those foreigners targeted for surveillance.

The program expires Monday, and critics want changes, including a requirement for warrants before authorities can access the emails, phone calls or text messages of Americans. They also want limits on the government’s use of internet data brokers, who sell large volumes of personal information gleaned online, offering the government what critics say amounts to an end-run around the Constitution.

Despite bipartisan criticism, the chances of significant reforms dropped when Trump announced his support for the program’s renewal, saying it had proven its worth in supplying information vital to recent U.S. actions in Venezuela and Iran.

The fact is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our military,” Trump said on Truth Social Tuesday.

U.S. authorities say the program, known as Section 702 of the law, is vital to national security and has saved lives by uncovering terror plots. Critics question what they call a dangerous infringement on civil liberties and privacy.

In a Truth Social post, Trump said a different FISA provision was used to spy on his 2016 campaign but that he supported Section 702’s renewal despite misgivings that political adversaries could use parts of the law against him in the future. He called on lawmakers to extend the foreign surveillance program for another 18 months.

My administration has worked tirelessly to ensure these FISA reforms are being aggressively executed at every level of the Executive Branch to keep Americans safe, while protecting our sacred Civil Liberties guaranteed by our Great Constitution,” Trump wrote.

Trump is a longtime critic of the nation’s intelligence services and was once opposed to Section 702 before he reversed himself. “KILL FISA” Trump posted on social media in 2024, when the provision was last reauthorized.

Trump isn’t the only one-time critic to change their mind: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard sponsored legislation to repeal Section 702 as a Hawaii congresswoman but now supports it after being tapped to coordinate the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies.

Gabbard says new protections added since her time in Congress helped change her mind.

In addition to a requirement for a warrant to access Americans’ data, critics also want greater protections on how the FBI or other agencies can search communications and how that is reported to the public.

Journalists, foreign aid workers, people with family overseas, all could have their communications swept up in this surveillance merely because they talked to someone outside of this country,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. The longtime critic of the law is pushing for changes that he said will ensure the government isn’t violating civil rights in secret.

Several Republicans also have suggested changes, such as the warrant requirement.

“National security and civil liberties are not mutually exclusive,” said Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz. “We can give our intelligence professionals the tools they need to target foreign threats while ensuring that Americans are not subjected to unconstitutional surveillance.”

Gabbard’s office releases an annual report showing the number of foreign surveillance targets and number of searches likely to identify an American.

For 2025, the number of foreign surveillance targets increased to nearly 350,000 from almost 292,000 in 2024. Searches using terms likely to identify an American decreased slightly to 7,724 from 7,845 in 2024.

The totals are incomplete because agencies like the FBI have found ways to access the data without reporting the searches publicly, said Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University.

FBI officials repeatedly violated their own standards when searching for intelligence related to the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol and racial justice protests in 2020, according to a 2024 court order.

It’s reminiscent of J. Edgar Hoover’s tenure at the FBI,” Goitein said, referring to the FBI’s founding director who used illegal surveillance to harass and spy on Americans. “They can pretty much target anyone.”

Despite bipartisan concerns about the law and its implications for civil liberties, time is running out for Congress to make any changes before Monday’s expiration.

Trump’s support also reduces the odds that enough Republicans will break ranks and join Democrats to push for reforms.

Wyden said Section 702 votes are routinely delayed until the last minute, then lawmakers are told that national security demands they vote yes. Lawmakers are told, he said, that “if they vote for any amendments, the program will die and terrible things will happen and it will be all their fault.”

The best chance for inserting changes likely is the House, where a large number of lawmakers from both parties have expressed concerns.

But Rep. Rick Crawford, an Arkansas Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, is backing Trump’s call for an 18-month renewal.

Crawford has taken aim in the past at what he calls the weaponization of intelligence but said last month that he believes the government can empower spy agencies while also holding them accountable.

“We can walk and chew gum at the same time,” Crawford said.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/16/2026 – 13:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/jAimQ1n Tyler Durden

LIV Golf CEO Denies “Speculation” That Saudi Arabia On Cusp Of Severing Ties

LIV Golf CEO Denies “Speculation” That Saudi Arabia On Cusp Of Severing Ties

Update (1130ET)Amid reports that Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund might be on the verge of pulling its funding for the league, LIV Golf CEO Scott O’Neil told staff in an email overnight that its season will go on “as planned, uninterrupted and at full throttle.”

The email, which was obtained by ESPN, didn’t directly address reports that PIF might stop investing in the breakaway circuit after spending more than $5 billion since its inception in 2022, or whether the league will continue competitions beyond this season.

“I want to be crystal clear: Our season continues exactly as planned, uninterrupted and at full throttle,” O’Neil wrote in the email.

“While the media landscape is often filled with speculation, our reality is defined by the work we do on the grass. We are heading into the heart of our 2026 schedule with the full energy of an organization that is bigger, louder, and more influential than ever before.”

LIV Golf is scheduled to play its sixth tournament of the season starting Thursday at Club de Golf Chapultepec near Mexico City.

Its first tournament in the U.S. is scheduled for May 7-10 at Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Virginia.

*  *  *

As Middle East Eye reported earlier, Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) is on the cusp of cutting its backing for LIV Golf, as it tightens its belt amid the US-Israeli war on Iran and delayed megaprojects at home.

The Financial Times reported on Wednesday that the kingdom’s sovereign wealth fund could announce it was stepping away from the Saudi-backed golf tour, established in 2021, as early as Thursday, taking a hit on its $5bn investment in the entity.

via AFP

The report said PIF had been weighing an exit before the US-Israeli war on Iran began, but any decision would likely send a chill through the sports world and other entities seeking cash from Gulf sovereign wealth funds.

PIF is the main backer of LIV Golf, which has racked up major losses since its founding in 2021, and the move would likely spell its demise.

PIF’s bet on LIV Golf to rival the PGA Tour was one in a series of investments that were made in a bid to bolster the kingdom’s involvement in sports and entertainment, as it pushes to diversify its economy away from energy.

Even before the US-Israeli war on Iran, high-flying projects were being cancelled or massively scaled down. The kingdom’s finance minister, Mohammed al-Jadaan, said in December that it had “no ego” preventing it from reassessing projects.

Earlier this year, Saudi Arabia suspended construction of the Mukaab, a giant cube-shaped structure set to be built in downtown Riyadh. The kingdom also shelved plans to build a desert ski resort and a large dam for an artificial lake.

Because of its East-West pipeline running from the Gulf to the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia can bypass Iran’s control of the Strait of Hormuz. It is practically the only Gulf state exporting oil amid the war and is benefiting from higher oil prices.

But the conflict has also made it harder for Gulf states to present themselves as safe hubs for tourism and business.

Yasir al-Rumayyan, the governor of PIF, told Al Arabiya Business on Wednesday that the war on Iran was having an effect on PIF’s calculus, saying that “the war would add more pressure to reposition some priorities”.

Rumayyan confirmed for the first time that a 170km straight-line city envisioned to be part of the larger Neom development was no longer a priority.

“There are directives to Neom to reprioritise. Everyone thinks The ‌Line is Neom, but The Line is one project in Neom,” he said. “Is it necessary to have The Line by 2030? I think no. It’s good to have, but not a must-have,” he said.

Cutting ties with LIV Golf would align with the kingdom’s efforts to keep more of its sovereign wealth fund cash at home. PIF is estimated to be worth $1 trillion.

Rumayyan said that PIF wanted 80 percent of its investments to go to local projects while it deployed 20 percent abroad, down from a high of 30 percent in recent years.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 04/16/2026 – 13:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wnjiOD2 Tyler Durden

62-Year-Old Protester Acquitted on All Charges for Wearing Penis Costume


Jeana Renea Gamble wore the offending phallus—holding a "No Dick-Tator" sign—at a "No Kings" protest. | Adani Samat

This week, a 62-year-old Alabama woman faced a criminal trial for wearing an inflatable penis costume during a protest.

After three hours of testimony, a judge acquitted her of all charges—a welcome result for her free speech rights.

In October 2025, Jeana Renea Gamble wore the offending phallus—holding a “No Dick-Tator” sign—at a “No Kings” protest. Responding to the scene, Cpl. Andrew Babb of the Fairhope Police Department threw Gamble to the ground and arrested her for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest.

Prosecutors later added charges of disturbing the peace and giving a false name to law enforcement—the latter because when she was asked her name, Gamble replied “Aunt Tifa,” a play on antifa, the shorthand used by antifascist activists.

The case was flawed from the start: Babb’s body camera footage shows his tone was aggressive as soon as he arrived, and he threw her to the ground less than a minute after arriving, even though she was walking away from him at the time.

Besides, wearing an offensive costume is fully protected by the First Amendment.

Predictably, the prosecution faced an uphill battle. Judge Haymes Snedeker dropped the false name charge before the trial even began. And prosecutors struggled to establish why Gamble should even have been arrested in the first place, much less prosecuted.

“She was obstructing traffic and was a safety risk,” Babb testified at trial, adding that he tried to de-escalate the situation. The prosecution played “a single non-emergency phone call to police from a driver who was offended by the display,” according to Courthouse News.

But as defense attorney David Gespass noted, that wasn’t what Babb said on the scene. Bodycam footage shows that before he threw Gamble to the ground, Babb had only objected to her costume, demanding to know “how you would explain to my children what you’re supposed to be.” Even after the arrest, Babb took a phone call in which he says he told Gamble, “This is a family town….Being dressed like that is not going to be tolerated.” He never says anything about Gamble obstructing traffic.

“That’s all he talked about when he was confronting her was, ‘I am not going to put up with this in my town,'” Gespass said at trial. “Certainly, if you watch the video, he is not de-escalating anything. He approached her aggressively.”

“There is no constitutional right to wear a total erect penis on the side of the road,” said prosecuting attorney Marcus McDowell. “It was in the middle of the day, and during a [youth] baseball season.”

Imagine going to the trouble of going to law school, passing the bar, standing up in front of a judge, and being this wrong,” First Amendment attorney Adam Steinbaugh of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression responded on X, adding, “This may be the most eye-rolling invocation of ‘what about the children’ I’ve heard.”

Ultimately, the judge was unswayed. “There was probable cause for arrest, but I can’t convict and sentence someone unless I’m sure,” Snedeker said, acquitting on all charges. Gespass, Gamble’s attorney, disagreed about the probable cause and said they may sue the department for violating Gamble’s First Amendment rights.

“Free speech wins!” Gamble proclaimed after the acquittal, addressing the crowd of supporters that had gathered outside the courthouse. “We have civil rights in Fairhope!”

“We have some growing and relearning to do about the rights the citizens of this town have,” she added. “And as Alabamians, we dare defend our rights, and this fight is not over.”

The post 62-Year-Old Protester Acquitted on All Charges for Wearing Penis Costume appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/mAq6sTD
via IFTTT

Justice Ginsburg Cancer Treatment Leak Prosecution: Blame the Cat

From U.S. v. Russell, decided Tuesday by Fourth Circuit Chief Judge Albert Diaz, joined by Judges Robert King and Stephanie Thacker:

Before Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away, … [i]n January 2019, employees at George Washington University Hospital discovered a Twitter post that revealed information about Justice Ginsburg’s recent visits to the hospital. The post contained a screenshot of the hospital’s patient search screen, which highlighted Justice Ginsburg’s name and showed the dates of ten visits, along with medical services she received (which included radiology, oncology, and surgery services)….

Law enforcement later learned that before circulating on Twitter, the screenshot was posted on the anonymous message board 4Chan. It appeared on a thread titled “Politically Incorrect,” where users promoted a conspiracy theory that Justice Ginsburg had died and prominent Democrats were covering up her death.

The hospital’s Chief Information Officer, Nathan Read, investigated the leak. He obtained search logs for anyone who had used the hospital’s system to look for patients with last names starting with “Ginsb” in the relevant time frame….

Read’s … search parameters revealed that a non-hospital issued device, operating under Russell’s username, searched for “Gins” on January 7, 2019. That search was sandwiched between two others. Seconds before, the same device searched for “Barker,” and seconds after, it searched for “Ginston.” Barker was a hospital patient, but the hospital had no record of ever serving someone with the last name Ginston.

After concluding its investigation, the hospital deactivated Russell’s account, notified his employer, and gave Harlow’s and Russell’s names to law enforcement….

Federal Agents Mosi Forde and Chris Lalonde interviewed Russell at work. The CEO of Russell’s company, Lori Brigham, sat in on the interview “because she was concerned about the case and interested in the outcome.” Neither Forde nor Lalonde had asked her to attend. Brigham remained silent during the interview, except to once “wonder[ ] aloud what sensitive information could be derived from simply searching someone’s name.”

The agents told Russell that the interview was voluntary, he was free to leave at any time, and he could decline to answer any questions. According to Forde, Russell’s “affect was pleasant and measured” during the interview, and he “appeared to be under no apparent duress.”

The agents showed Russell the relevant search logs. He confirmed that the credentials used for the searches belonged to him. Russell also admitted that he’d run the search for “Barker,” who was his patient. But Russell denied searching for “Gins” and “Ginston.” {At trial, the government argued that Russell searched for “Ginston” to conceal that he was looking for Justice Ginsburg’s health records.}

When asked what “Gins” stood for, Russell said that “if he had to take a guess, it was Justice Ginsburg.” The agents hadn’t yet mentioned the Justice’s name in the interview. Russell also “guessed” that the agents were speaking with him “because someone had taken a screenshot of Justice Ginsburg’s medical record.”

Russell insisted that he didn’t know how his credentials had been used to run the “Gins” and “Ginston” searches. But he theorized that “potentially his cat had run across the keyboard and typed in those letters.” He also suggested that the searches could be typos or that a coworker may have used his login information….

Russell was prosecuted, and convicted of “destroying and altering records, and … obtaining individually identifiable health information,” and acquitted “of disclosing individually identifiable health information.” He was sentenced to 2 years in prison.

The court concluded there was enough evidence to sustain the conviction:

The jury convicted Russell under 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6(a)(2), which prohibits “obtain[ing] individually identifiable health information relating to an individual.” This includes any information that

(A) is created or received by a health care provider … and

(B) relates to the past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition of an individual, the provision of health care to an individual, or the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to an individual, and—

(i) identifies the individual; or

(ii) with respect to which there is a reasonable basis to believe that the information can be used to identify the individual.

A person violates the statute “if the information is maintained by a covered entity … and the individual obtained … such information without authorization.” Healthcare providers like George Washington University Hospital are covered entities….

Russell argues that the information about Justice Ginsburg in the screenshot doesn’t qualify as “individually identifiable health information.” Although he admits the screenshot showed that the Justice received medical care from the hospital, Russell asks us to limit the statute’s application to individuals who obtain “information about [a patient’s] specific health conditions,” such as “details about the [patient’s] particular physician and type of treatment.” In Russell’s view, because the screenshot didn’t disclose the precise nature of Justice Ginsburg’s illness or the names of her doctors, it can’t serve as the basis for his conviction.

We reject this crabbed view of the statute. The screenshot identified the Justice by name and disclosed where she was being treated, her arrival and discharge dates, and the medical services provided, which included radiology and oncology services. As a witness testified, this information revealed that Justice Ginsburg “had been receiving treatment from [the hospital] for various things related to cancer seemingly since at least 2014.”

This information falls well within the heartland of the conduct the statute is aimed at because it “relates to the past … health or condition of an individual, [and] the provision of health care to an individual.” To hold otherwise would flout the spirit of the law. At the very least, a reasonable juror could accept that the screenshot contained personal health information sufficient to support a conviction under § 1320d-6(a)(2).

And the court held that the CEO’s presence during the interview didn’t make Russell’s statements to law enforcement “involuntary” for legal purposes and thus inadmissible:

[T]he district court didn’t say that implied threats to employment can never be coercive. It simply found that there was no such threat here. Russell didn’t identify a case where “the mere presence of the employer or the CEO [in a conversation with law enforcement] could be construed as a threat, implicit or explicit.” …

The district court concluded that “there’s nothing in the record that suggests that the interaction between the agents and [Russell] involved coercive police activity, either in the words that were spoken or in their actions[,]” [because] … (1) Russell was an English-speaking adult with higher education; (2) law enforcement questioned him in a conference room with windows and at least one unlocked door; (3) the agents told Russell that he “was free to leave at any time, [and] that the interview was voluntary”; (4) the agents didn’t brandish weapons or any other indicia of force or coercion; (5) Russell “felt free to admit certain inculpatory evidence”; and (6) the agents hadn’t asked the CEO to attend the interview.

Given these findings, the CEO’s presence (without more) doesn’t rise to the level of coercive police activity. So the district court correctly denied the motion to suppress.

Lauren Nicole Beebe and Zoe Bedell represent the government.

The post Justice Ginsburg Cancer Treatment Leak Prosecution: Blame the Cat appeared first on Reason.com.

from Latest – Reason.com https://ift.tt/1uHqLOP
via IFTTT