“There’s An Odd Chill In The Air” – Dallas Fed Respondents Warn Of “Pending Doom”

“There’s An Odd Chill In The Air” – Dallas Fed Respondents Warn Of “Pending Doom”

For the 22nd straight month, The Dallas Fed’s Manufacturing Survey headline indicator was negative in February.

Despite it’s bounce from January lows, the headline remained at -11.3 (while the six-months-ahead forecast also surged to +11.8 – highest since Feb 2022)…

Source: Bloomberg

Under the hood, everything seemed positive too…

Labor market measures suggested growth in employment, Wage and input costs continued to increase this month, while selling prices remained flat. The new orders index – a key measure of demand – shot up 18 points in January to 5.2. The raw materials prices index retreated five points to 15.4, falling further below average and indicative of more modest cost growth than usual.

Source: Bloomberg

So, labor good, prices down, new orders awesome – sounds great right?

Let’s ask the business owners in the Dallas area how they feel…

There’s an odd chill in the air that we can’t determine if it’s election related, general economic malaise or fear of pending doom. It’s very strange. Things are status quo with a bit of negative undertone, which is somewhat disturbing for business owners.”

Turmoil at the federal level is impacting funding.”

“Sales were below projections for January and February; March does not look encouraging.

“The shortage of labor that was critical during the pandemic and after has turned to being merely very tight—meaning very difficult to find qualified personnel. Job jumping has ground to a halt.

“I have no idea what is going to happen.

“The economy is hurting the trucking business. The uncertainty is bothering people.

Please lower interest rates.

So, ‘the data’ is positive, but ‘the anecdotes’ are a shitshow.

We’ll let Jeff Bezos explain which to pay more attention to…

“The thing I have noticed is when the anecdotes and the data disagree, the anecdotes are usually right.

There’s something wrong with the way you are measuring it.”

One can’t help but see the glaring gap between private reality and managed data’s sense of it – makes you wonder if there’s an agenda at work.

Even Goldman recently admitted that there is vast divide between how happy we should all be based on government-supplied data versus how we actually feel…

Bidenomics!?

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 12:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/mh0Xefr Tyler Durden

“War Cycle” Will Continue To Build Into 2025 – Charles Nenner Sees “Super Bull Market In Gold & Silver”

“War Cycle” Will Continue To Build Into 2025 – Charles Nenner Sees “Super Bull Market In Gold & Silver”

Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

Renowned geopolitical and financial cycle expert Charles Nenner has been warning of a huge war and financial cycle, and it is clear both continue to build. 

The war cycle will continue to amplify until World War III breaks out.  Meanwhile, unpayable debt will continue to explode until another Great Depression hits America again. 

Standing in the gap is gold, and the wait for a bull market is about over.  Nenner explains,

“The dollar’s buying power could possibly  be cut in half…

That’s the reason why we expect a super bull market in gold and silver when the cycle bottoms.  You remember I came on and said coming, coming, but not yet? 

I say it was too early . . . but, now, we are getting very close to a bull market…

Gold could still have one more down move because the cycles are still down.”

On Bitcoin, Nenner says, “We had a high of $54,000, and we said if it hit $52,000, we would sell…

I do not believe this story that Bitcoin will hit $100,000 based on my work.  It has been proven that NASDAQ and Bitcoin go up and down together because it is based on nothing, and people are buying out of greed.  Because we think we are at a top in the NASDAQ, then we don’t think the outlook for Bitcoin is too positive.”

Nenner thinks the DOW is also topping, and he is telling clients to lighten up on the risk. Nenner sees a second Great Depression playing out again in 2026 or 2027.

Nenner thinks the “War Cycle” will continue to build in 2024, but all bets are off in 2025.

Nenner says his wealthy clients see dark days ahead for the world and have actual bunkers to go along with a bunker mentality.  Nenner think domestic terror and even war is coming to America in a big way.  Nenner is still forecasting “2 billion will die in the next global war, and the only way we get a body count that high is with nuclear weapons.”

Nenner sees an election coming in 2024 and still thinks Trump can win.  Nenner warns that problems in America are too big for any one person to actually fix.  Nenner still thinks if you know winter is coming, you cannot stop it, but you can get a winter coat.  Again, Nenner thinks “Trump is the winter coat.”

There is much more in the 32-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with renowned cycle analyst and financial expert Charles Nenner for 2.24.24.

*  *  *

To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here

There is free information and analysis on CharlesNenner.com. You can also sign up to be a subscriber for Nenner’s cutting edge cycle work with a free trial period by clicking here.  

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 12:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/sR9O8jm Tyler Durden

Even Warren Buffett’s legendary optimism is fading.

Early in the spring of 1956, only weeks after Elvis Presley released his debut studio album, and actress Norma Jean Mortenson had her name legally changed to Marilyn Monroe, a budding 25-year-old businessman from the American Midwest fatefully registered his first-ever company.

His name, of course, was Warren Buffett. And the company he founded was called Buffett Associates– which was formed with $105,000 of capital from his friends and family.

The US economy at the time was absolutely booming. Interest rates in 1956 were at historic lows. Inflation was practically zero. Economic growth was a dizzying 7%. Productivity growth was strong.

The US was no longer at war. And the national debt– which had reached a peak of 120% of GDP in the 1940s due to the costs of World War II– had been cut in half… and was falling further each year.

America was proudly capitalist, and the government actually made sound and effective investments, like the US federal highway system. Businesses reaped the benefits: corporate earnings across the S&P 500 index soared.

Yet, at the time when Buffett formed his business in 1956, stocks were still cheap… trading at less than 12x earnings (versus nearly 30x today).

It’s hard to imagine better economic or market conditions: a high growth, capitalist economy with low inflation, low debt, high productivity, and cheap stocks? Buffett could have hardly picked a better time to get started.

And, although there were plenty of ups and downs along the way, those pristine conditions lasted throughout the first several decades of his career.

Buffett is obviously one of the most talented investors to have ever lived, and he surrounded himself with other incredibly talented people.

But (and he would probably be the first to admit) his success would not have been as great without the power and dynamism of the US economy behind him.

And this is why Warren Buffett has long been one of America’s biggest economic cheerleaders.

Over the past 15+ years, Buffett has had an insider’s view of some very concerning trends. The US national debt has been rising out of control. The Federal Reserve has made a mess of the dollar. Woke fanatics have hijacked capitalism.

Yet through it all, Buffett has maintained a calm, persistent optimism in America; he routinely dismisses concerns over the debt, or the dollar, or the future of the US economy, and has seemed to believe that nothing could ever derail American progress.

But as I read through his annual letter this past weekend, it seems that even Buffett’s legendary optimism is starting to crack.

First, it’s clear that even Buffett thinks that government regulation has gone way too far.

Buffett explains, for example, that utility companies were “once regarded as among the most stable industries in America” because of their consistent profitability.

Yet he laments that the utility companies he acquired were a “severe earnings disappointment” in 2023 due to over-regulation from fanatical politicians.

Buffet complains that “the regulatory climate in a few states has raised the specter of zero profitability or even bankruptcy (an actual outcome at California’s largest utility and a current threat in Hawaii).”

“In such jurisdictions,” he writes, “it is difficult to project both earnings and asset values in what was once regarded as among the most stable industries in America.”

In the end, he tells shareholders that he “did not anticipate or even consider the adverse developments in regulatory [changes] and . . . made a costly mistake in not doing so.”

He goes on to talk about America’s dilapidated infrastructure, which is in critical need of maintenance and reinvestment. And Buffett cites the case of BNSF Railway (the largest freight rail in the US) which he acquired in 2009.

BNSF, he explains, has had to spend tens of billions of dollars to fix up its rail network “simply [to] maintain its present level of business. This reality is bad for owners. . .”

But it’s not just BNSF. And it’s not just railways. Almost ALL infrastructure in the US is in serious need of repair.

Obviously, the US government made a halfhearted attempted to address infrastructure challenges when it passed a $1 trillion investment package in 2021. But “the consequent capital expenditure” that’s truly required to fix it, Buffett writes, “will be staggering.”

One final point worth mentioning is Buffett’s comments on size. Again, when he started his first partnership in 1956, he only had $105k to invest, and he could move nimbly in and out of the market.

Today, Buffett’s company has almost $170 billion in cash, which is virtually impossible to manage efficiently. He writes that it’s “like turning a battleship”, and that the days of being quick and nimble “are long behind us; size did us in…”

Buffett, of course, is talking about his own company (Berkshire Hathaway). But the same could just as easily be said for the US government.

Think about it– if someone of Buffett’s extraordinary talent admits that he cannot efficiently deploy $170 billion, how are Joe Biden or Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg supposed to be able to invest that $1 trillion infrastructure money?

Quite poorly, I’d imagine.

Buffett does acknowledge that “America has been a terrific country for investors.” And he’s absolutely right. It still is, for the most part.

Nvidia is an easy example: it simply would not have been able to achieve the same level of success had it been based in most other countries. If Nvidia were a Chinese company, for example, it would have been taken over by the CCP long ago, and CEO Jensen Huang would have probably been disappeared.

But one of the most important caveats of investing applies to the US economy as well: “past performance does not guarantee future results.”

Warren Buffett enjoyed some of the most pristine economic conditions imaginable for the vast majority of his nearly 70-year career. And as I have written several times, it is absolutely possible that America’s best days are still ahead.

There is clearly a future scenario in which small-scale nuclear reactors generate clean, low-carbon, ultra-cheap energy which powers highly productive AI and robotic automation. Economic growth is off the charts, and tax revenue soars as a result. The national debt eventually melts away, and the US re-establishes its primacy by out-producing and out-innovating the competition.

But at the moment there are serious issues to contend with.

US productivity is anemic. So is economic growth. War, inflation, cyberattacks, border crisis, social conflict, the rise of adversary nations, decline of the US dollar’s dominance, etc. are all pervasive challenges.

(Not to mention potential near-term consequences– like the impact of Russia, China, North Korea, and terrorist groups sending so many of their operatives across the southern border.)

The government not only isn’t fixing these problems, but they seem to be making them worse by the day.

So, it’s important to take notice when even someone as optimistic as Buffett starts complaining.

Source

from Schiff Sovereign https://ift.tt/jBwI6rs
via IFTTT

Ugly 2Y Auction Tails As Size Jumps To Record $63 Billion

Ugly 2Y Auction Tails As Size Jumps To Record $63 Billion

In the first of today’s two coupon auctions, moments ago the Treasury sold 2 year paper in size…  a record $63 billion of size to be precise. This was the biggest 2Y auction in history, and – we aren’t shocking anyone here – it’s only uphill for 2Y treasury auction sizes from here.

The high yield of 4.691% was 32.6bps above last month’s and also tailed the When Issued 4.689% by 0.2bps, the first tail since November.

There was more mediocrity: the bid to cover dropped to 2.492, down from 2.571 last month and the lowest since March 2023.

The internals were less ugly: Indirects took down 65.2%, flat from last month’s 65.3% and above the six-auction average of 62.8%. And with Directs taking down 20.1%, or the most since November, Dealers were left holding 14.73%, down from 14.83% last month and the lowest since September.

Overall, this was a subpar auction which however is to be expected with the size hitting a record high, and only set to rise from here. The market reaction was quick, with yields across the curve rising, and the 10Y yield hitting session highs of 4.29% moments after the auction.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 11:53

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Ek3ZPVb Tyler Durden

Morning Wood: ARK Trims Nvidia Stake Further, Cuts TSMC Position

Morning Wood: ARK Trims Nvidia Stake Further, Cuts TSMC Position

The main question on investors minds right now is when the euphoria in AI stocks is going to lose steam. 

ARK’s Cathie Wood isn’t waiting around for an answer. The investment manager, who has been long Nvidia since it traded in single digits, continues to trim her stake in the name while at the same time lightning up on shares of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Her sales of TSMC are the first such sales she has made is more than two years, according to Bloomberg/Yahoo. Those sales are another way to trim the firm’s exposure to Nvidia, which is a key customer of TSMC, the report says. 

Wood sold 8,599 American depositary receipts of TSMC from its Ark Autonomous Technology and Robotics ETF. On the same day, the same ETF also sold 2,362 shares of Nvidia, according to Bloomberg data. 

The scaling back of ARK’s investments in major semiconductor companies comes amidst continued excitement over artificial intelligence in the market, notably after Nvidia’s significant earnings beat out just days ago.

Nvidia has seen a 59% increase this year, while TSMC’s ADRs have climbed 25%, Bloomberg notes. Ark funds acquired TSMC shares several times in 2023, holding around 221,848 shares in total.

Wood, a vocal advocate for AI’s impact as a part of her “innovation” tagline has reallocated investments from these tech giants to emerging software firms like UiPath and Twilio, moving away from the surge that elevated Nvidia’s value to nearly $2 trillion.

TSMC and Nvidia are no longer among the top 10 holdings of her autonomous ETF, which emphasizes industrial innovation.

Could Wood be timing a market top correctly?

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 11:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/yxFqgc1 Tyler Durden

Before Joe, James, & Hunter, There Was Great-Great-Grandpa Moses

Before Joe, James, & Hunter, There Was Great-Great-Grandpa Moses

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

Below is my column in new research published in the Washington Post that turned up an interesting case involving the prosecution of the great-great-grandfather of President Joe Biden.

What was interesting about the account was not the criminality, which can be found in the history of many families. Rather it was the intervention of allies and negating of the conviction of Moses Robinette that was so ironic in light of the current controversies.

Here is the column:

The Bidens have shown a legendary skill at evading legal accountability. Even in the face of overwhelming evidence, Biden family members often marshal political allies and media to kill investigations or cut sweetheart deals.

The Bidens swim in scandal with the ease and agility of a bottlenose dolphin. From his own plagiarism scandal to his brother’s role in killing a man to his son’s various federal crimes, Bidens have long been a wonder in Washington.

It turns out that it may be something of a family trait acquired through generations of natural selection.

A historian recently discovered that Joe Biden’s great-great-grandfather, Moses J. Robinette,  was accused and found guilty of attempted murder. The case followed a strikingly familiar pattern.

Fittingly, Robinette was a government contractor. He was paid to give veterinary care for the horses of the Union army during the Civil War, taking the job after his hotel was burned down.

At 42, Robinette sounded like his great-great-grandson. He was married and described as “full of fun, always lively and joking.” But the good times ended on March 21, 1864 in Beverly Ford, Va., Robinette got into a fight with another contractor, John J. Alexander, who overheard Robinette bad mouthing him to a female cook. When Alexander confronted him, Robinette pulled a knife and, in the ensuing fight, cut Alexander repeatedly.

It was an early version of President Biden’s “corn pop” story where he faced a gang member wielding a straight razor. However, in this version “the Bad Dude” was a wagon master, and it was the Biden family member wielding the knife. Robinette left Alexander bleeding from multiple cuts. His trial noted that he was intoxicated and had incited “a dangerous quarrel.” (It appears that back then it was a Biden arguing over what truly constitutes “incitement.”)

Robinette argued a lack of intent to commit murder, insisting “I had no malice towards Mr. Alexander before or since. He grabbed me and possibly might have injured me seriously had I not resorted to the means that I did.”

The argument would make Abby Lowell blush, since there was no evidence that Alexander had even been armed. Robinette was found guilty of attempted murder and sentenced to two years’ incarceration at hard labor.

That is when the case took another familiar turn. Friends of Robinette interceded with the Army and powerful political figures.

There were long delays. It took three months for the commander of the Army of the Potomac, Gen. George G. Meade, to confirm Robinette’s sentence. His friends then went to Waitman T. Willey, the senator from West Virginia, who went to bat for Biden, who pressured President Abraham Lincoln’s private secretary, John G. Nicolay, who then leaned on the judge advocate general, Joseph Holt, to send over a report and full accounting of the case.

Biden’s associates argued that, although Robinette had been the only person armed, the victim was a teamster “much his superior in strength and Size, all under the impulse of the excitement of the moment.”

They beseeched Lincoln to “think of his motherless Daughters and sons at home! … [Praying for] your interposition in behalf of the unfortunate Father…and distressed family of loved Children, Union Daughters & Union Sons.”

Their final argument was the one quintessentially Bidenesque.

They told Lincoln that he was a political ally who was “ardent, and Influential … in opposing Traitors and their schemes to destroy the Government.” (It appears, even back then, the Bidens were union men.)

It worked. Lincoln was known for leniency in pardons, and he signed a “Pardon for unexecuted part of punishment. A. Lincoln.” on Sept. 1. 1864. Robinette was a free man.

So Robinette was found guilty at trial, severely cut an unarmed man, but was freed with the help of a U.S. senator with a plea that he was a loyal political ally.

Whatever the true merits, it showed the importance of having friends in high places.

Or, as the president once put it more bluntly, “No one f**ks with a Biden.” It is family scripture that runs from Moses to James to Joseph.

Sixty years later, Moses’s great-great-grandson was found by a special counsel to have willfully retained classified material, mishandled that material for decades, and to have probably shown the classified material to a ghostwriter who lacked clearance. He was spared any criminal charge in part because he would make a sympathetic defendant due to his diminished mental faculties.

If that is not enough, political allies are rallying to his side to stop any corruption investigation while calling his detractors “traitors” and “Putin lovers.”

After charges were brought against a former FBI asset for his false claims about bribing President Biden, Democratic operatives and media figures went into full conspiracy-theory mode to end any further investigation into the Biden family.

Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) went so far as to declare that anyone now looking into the Biden corruption scandal is by definition “a knowing asset of Russian intelligence” and “acting as an agent of Vladimir Putin.”

It is, of course, perfectly absurd. The charges against Alexander Smirnov have no bearing on dozens of allegedly corrupt payments and hundreds of emails that are being investigated by Congress. Try to ask the Bidens about the millions they have pocketed from foreign sources, and you are some kind of Russian dupe.

NBC News correspondent Ken Dilanian absurdly declared that the long ago-debunked letter by intelligence officials claiming that Hunter Biden’s laptop is a fake and part of a Russian disinformation campaign must now be accepted as true. He must have missed that the laptop has been authenticated separately, irrespective of Smirnov’s lies.

Not only do Biden allies want to end any further discussion of the family corruption, but former Democratic Sen Claire McCaskill has angrily demanded that the media stop any more fact checks of Biden on any subject. She previously attacked witnesses exposing the Biden censorship system, including calling some “Putin lovers.”

It really has very little do with the Russians. This is what Bidens do best.

When Hunter previously threatened a Chinese businessman by warning that his father was “sitting next” to him and waiting for money, Hunter stressed that he should tell the head of his company that “the Bidens are the best at doing exactly what the chairman wants.”

After generations, the Bidens are still showing the same nimble qualities of great-great-granddad Moses. Indeed, they could replace the legend on their family crest with “Manus manum lavat, “one hand washes the other.”

*  *  *

N.B.: Notably, after this column ran the usual suspects are gathering around a “readers added context” that briefly appeared (before being taken down by Twitter). It suggested that I was arguing in the column that the Bidens are genetically prone to crime in discussing Biden’s great-great-grandfather’s conviction for attempted murder. (The “trait” was actually a reference to their ability to deal with scandal, not criminality itself). It takes an utter lack of sense of humor to interpret the reference to natural selection in managing legal controversies as a literal argument a genetic preposition toward crime. However, humor like reason is a stranger in an age of rage.

The column was obviously drawing ironic, not genetic, comparisons to the current allegations. In anticipation of the next spin, I also referred to the “scripture” of the Bidens but I was not suggesting that they are divine or prophets. I also compared the Bidens to bottlenose dolphins but I do not believe that they are aquatic mammals. Finally, I do not believe that there is a genetic loss of humor. The faux outrage is merely adaptive behavior in this political ecosystem.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 11:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/BZDfhVd Tyler Durden

Shutdown Week Kicks Off With Complete Chaos As Friday Deadline Approaches

Shutdown Week Kicks Off With Complete Chaos As Friday Deadline Approaches

With the Senate back in session today from the Presidents Day recess and the House returning on Wednesday, lawmakers will be racing to avoid a partial shutdown by Friday’s funding deadline.

With leadership talks breaking down over the weekend, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) blamed House Republicans for the delay. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), however, blamed “new Democrat demands” for the impasse.

“While we had hoped to have legislation ready this weekend that would give ample time for members to review the text, it is clear now that House Republicans need more time to sort themselves out,” Schumer wrote in a Sunday “Dear colleague” letter calling on Johnson to “step up to once again buck the extremists in his caucus and do the right thing.”

Johnson hit back, saying Schumer’s letter was full of “counterproductive rhetoric.”

“Leader Schumer’s letter fails to mention that many of the points still being debated come from new Democrat demands that were not previously included in the Senate bills,” Johnson said. “At a time of divided government, Senate Democrats are attempting at this late stage to spend on priorities that are farther left than what their chamber agreed upon.”

On Tuesday morning, the “big four” leaders – Johnson, Schumer, along with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, will convene at the White House with President Biden to discuss the shutdown and lobby Johnson to pass funding for Ukraine, Punchbowl News reports.

Johnson faces the same dilemma which resulted in the ouster of his predecessor, Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) – with the House Freedom Caucus insisting on spending cuts and border security, leaving Johnson with only one option: make a deal with Democrats that risks yet another ouster from the position.

Johnson’s current solution is to try and pass a series of spending bills known as a “minibus,” according to The Hill, which would, if successful, include the four due on Friday.

Punchbowl, which has an excellent track record on inside baseball in DC, suggests that while current disagreements shouldn’t be insurmountable, Johnson – with the House Freedom Caucus at his neck, may be toying with a shutdown to give himself leverage in cutting a deal with Democrats that the Freedom Caucus is willing to accept.

With both sides saying progress was being made last week, congressional leaders had hoped to release text for the first four spending bills by Sunday night. These cover the Agriculture, Energy and Water, MilCon-Va and Transportation-HUD bills, the first tranche of annual appropriations under the “laddered” continuing resolution Johnson demanded last year.

But House GOP conservatives have refused to concede on anything. When Johnson said during a Friday night conference call with members that he wanted to do the first group of bills this week on the floor — meaning he would need Democratic help to pass them under suspension — there was strong pushback from Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and other hardliners. -Punchbowl News

This is not a time for petty politics,” Johnson said, adding that “the House has worked nonstop, and is continuing to work in good faith, to reach agreement with the Senate on compromise government funding bills in advance of the deadlines.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 11:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ExHCvj0 Tyler Durden

Ukraine’s Top Spy Chief Says Navalny Died From Blood Clot, Rejects ‘Murder’ Narrative

Ukraine’s Top Spy Chief Says Navalny Died From Blood Clot, Rejects ‘Murder’ Narrative

In a very unexpected plot twist, Ukraine appears to be in agreement with the Kremlin on Alexei Navalny’s death inside a far northern Russian prison which occurred on Feb. 16 and was listed by Russian authorities as officially due to “natural causes”. The dominant Western narrative has thus far been that Putin had him “murdered”. 

Yet now Kiev sources are saying that the anti-Putin activist supported by the West died of a blood clot. Surprisingly, this explanation is being advanced among Ukraine media sources after none other than Gen. Kyrylo Budanov, chief of the Main Directorate of Intelligence (HUR), bluntly stated it to a group of journalists on Sunday. “I may disappoint you, but as far as we know, he indeed died as a result of a blood clot. And this has been more or less confirmed,” Budanov stated.

“This wasn’t sourced from the internet, but, unfortunately, natural [causes],” he added in the remarks which were also caught on video. The spy chief’s words were also picked up in The Daily Mail, though predictably US mainstream outlets have been slow to acknowledge the assessment.

Further, the NATO-friendly pundit Anton Gerashchenko, who also served as former Ukrainian Advisor to Internal Affairs Minister, has said the following:

Vladimir Osechkin, founder of Gulagu. Net, says that, according to his sources, Navalny was killed (finished off with a blow to the chest) after being tortured with frost.

Head of Ukrainian military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov said that according to his sources, “it was a blood clot.”

Over the weekend Navalny’s mother, Lyudmila Navalnaya, said her son’s body was finally released to the family. She has said Russian officials are seeking to pressure the family into doing a ‘secret funeral’ so as not to attract public demonstrations. “We do not know if the authorities will interfere to carry it out as the family wants and as Alexey deserves,” she said previously.

Navalny’s wife has laid ultimate blame on Putin for his death, while President Biden too and other Western leaders have said “Putin is responsible.”

“What has happened to Navalny is yet more proof of Putin’s brutality,” Biden had said immediately after Navalny’s death was announced by Russian prison services. Some European leaders quickly branded Putin’s government a “rogue regime” as a result, urging that Moscow “must be held accountable”. The whole situation seems akin to the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, where there was a rush to blame Moscow, but allegation which were later quieted and walked back.

Meanwhile, Russia hawks in the US are urging the administration to go beyond last Friday’s large round of new anti-Moscow sanctions…

Another stunning development and further plot twist has emerged via Bloomberg reporting on Monday. Navalny was supposedly very close to being released amid secret talks involving the US and Germany:

Alexey Navalny had been close to release in a prisoner exchange with the US and Germany shortly before his death in an Arctic prison, a top aide to the Russian opposition leader said.

“Navalny was supposed to be freed in the coming days,” Maria Pevchikh said in a video statement posted Monday. Russian President Vladimir Putin was offered an assassin imprisoned in Germany in exchange for Navalny and two US citizens, she said.

Moscow has long been seeking to gain the freedom of Vadim Krasikov, who is currently serving a life sentence in Germany for the 2019 assassination of a former Chechen rebel in a Berlin park. Krasikov is widely believed to be part of Russia’s Federal Security Service, or FSB. Washington had reportedly previously rebuffed any prisoner swap deal involving Krasikov (related to talks in the context of the Brittney Griner and Viktor Bout swap).

Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, ex-Marine Paul Whelan, and schoolteacher Marc Fogel are all still in Russian custody. Two Americans were supposed to be part of this alleged impending Navalny swap. According to more from Bloomberg, citing a Navalny family spokesperson: 

Pevchikh didn’t name the two Americans involved in the deal. “Putin was clearly told that the only way to get Krasikov is to exchange him for Navalny,” said Pevchikh. Instead, he decided to “get rid of the bargaining chip” and “offer someone else when the time comes.”

Meanwhile, news of Navalny’s funeral arrangements will likely emerge in the coming days. His family has hinted at their desire to see it happen in Moscow, which could spark anti-Kremlin protests.

As for the aforementioned blood clot narrative offered by Ukraine’s military intelligence chief and possible context helping to explain why such a top level Kiev official would essentially “side” with the Kremlin on this, what’s missed in the West is the fact that Navalny had always been a fairly hardline nationalist. From a Ukrainian perspective, he wasn’t necessarily seen as an “ally” per se, even though he was anti-Putin. For more crucial context, see the below brief segment discussing Navalny’s checkered past…

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 10:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/EDHymIk Tyler Durden

US New Home Sales Disappoint In January, Prices Hit 2 Year Lows As Supply Jumps

US New Home Sales Disappoint In January, Prices Hit 2 Year Lows As Supply Jumps

New home sales rose in January, but less than expected.

After December’s 8.0% surprise jump was revised down to +7.2% MoM, January sales rose just 1.5% MoM (half the 3.0% expected). In fact all three of the last months’ data was revised lower…

The downward revision and disappointment reduced the YoY sales growth to just 1.8%

Source: Bloomberg

The total new home sales SAAR rose from a downwardly revised 651k to 661k in January (well below the 684k expected)…

Source: Bloomberg

Interestingly, the median new home price dropped to $413,000 – the lowest since Dec 2021.

Source: Bloomberg

Mortgage rates are back on the rise, not exactly a good sign for new home sales as homebuilders margins collapse…

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, new-home supply increased to 456,000 from the prior month, the most in over a year.

Source: Bloomberg

Is reality about to set in for the US housing market? Or will Powell step in (with a banking crisis excuse) to save all that ‘wealth’?

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 10:14

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/PX6lCBp Tyler Durden

Key Events This Week: All Eyes On Core PCE Amid Deluge Of Fed Speakers

Key Events This Week: All Eyes On Core PCE Amid Deluge Of Fed Speakers

After a relatively quiet week on the data front, things start to pick up again even as earnings season comes to a close.

In terms of key events, DB’s Jim Reid writes that it’s hard to look too far beyond the latest core PCE print on Thursday after the recent strong CPI report and the strong relevant sub-components in the PPI. DB economists believe the MoM core print will be at 0.36% vs. 0.17% last time. This would make it the highest since last January. The fact that last January was 0.51% means that rolling out base effects should help the YoY rate edge down a tenth to 2.8%. However it’s the monthly print that will be all important. Staying with inflation, preliminary CPI prints are also due from Germany and France (Thursday) and for the Eurozone (Friday).

Back to the US, we have new (today) and pending (Thursday) home sales with the focus on whether higher mortgage rates and bad weather in January has had a big impact. Then we have durable goods and consumer confidence (tomorrow), the second reading of Q4 GDP on Wednesday, the personal income and spending data (Thursday), and the ISM manufacturing data as well as unit auto sales as we close out the week by welcoming in a new month on Friday.

Friday is also the day that we could see a partial government shutdown if Congress fails to pass the 2024 budget that has already been agreed to. DB’s economists think that it’s possible we get a short-term continuing resolution for an extra week which would push it past the “Super Tuesday” primaries on the 5th and coincide with the deadline for the second tranche annual funding bills.

There is also a fair degree of Fed speak which you can see in the calendar at the end as usual alongside all the other data. Chinese PMIs on Friday might be the most interesting non-US data, and should include the lunar new year holidays in the sample period, so one to watch.

Courtesy of DB, here is a day-by-day calendar of events

Monday February 26

  • Data: US January new home sales, February Dallas Fed manufacturing activity, Japan January national CPI
  • Central banks: ECB’s Stournaras and Vujcic speak, BoE’s Breeden and Pill speak
  • Earnings: Workday, Zoom
  • Auctions: US 2-y Notes ($63bn), 5-y Notes ($64bn)

Tuesday February 27

  • Data: US January durable goods orders, February Conference Board consumer confidence, Richmond Fed manufacturing index, business conditions, Dallas fed services activity, Q4 house price purchase index, December FHFA house price index, Germany March GfK consumer confidence, France February consumer confidence, Eurozone January M3
  • Central banks: Fed’s Schmid and Barr speak, BoE’s Ramsden speaks
  • Earnings: Lowe’s, American Tower, AutoZone, Ferrovial, Puma, Macy’s
  • Auctions: US 7-y Notes ($42bn)

Wednesday February 28

  • Data: US January retail inventories, advance goods trade balance, Japan January industrial production, retail sales, Italy February manufacturing confidence, economic sentiment, consumer confidence, Eurozone February services, industrial, economic confidence, Canada Q4 current account balance
  • Central banks: Fed’s Bostic, Collins and Williams speak, ECB’s Muller speaks, BoE’s Mann speaks
  • Earnings: Salesforce, Snowflake, Universal Music Group, Holcim, Baidu, Okta, SQM, Endeavor Group, Paramount Global

Thursday February 29

  • Data: US January PCE, personal income and spending, pending home sales, February MNI Chicago PMI, Kansas City Fed manufacturing activity, initial jobless claims, UK January net consumer credit, mortgage approvals, M4, February Lloyds business barometer, Japan January job-to-applicant ratio, jobless rate, housing starts, Italy December industrial sales, Germany February unemployment claims rate, CPI, France February CPI, January PPI, consumer spending, Canada Q4 GDP
  • Central banks: Fed’s Bostic, Goolsbee and Mester speak, BoJ’s Takata speaks
  • Earnings: AB InBev, Dell, Autodesk, Haleon, Leonardo, Covestro

Friday March 1

  • Data: US February ISM manufacturing index, Kansas City Fed services activity, total vehicle sales, January construction spending, China February official PMIs, Caixin manufacturing PMI, Japan February consumer confidence, Italy January unemployment rate, February CPI, manufacturing PMI, budget balance, new car registrations, 2023 GDP, Eurozone February CPI, January unemployment rate, Canada February manufacturing PMI
  • Central banks: Fed’s Williams, Waller, Bostic, Daly and Kugler speak, ECB’s Holzmann speaks, BoE’s Pill speaks

* * *

The key economic data releases this week are the durable goods report on Tuesday, the core PCE report on Thursday, and the ISM manufacturing report on Friday. There are many speaking engagements from Fed officials this week, including governors Barr, Waller, and Kugler, as well as presidents Schmid, Bostic, Collins, Williams, Goolsbee, Mester, and Daly.

Monday, February 26

  • 10:00 AM New home sales, January (GS +3.5%, consensus +3.0%, last +8.0%)
  • 10:30 AM Dallas Fed manufacturing activity, February (consensus -14.0, last -27.4)
  • 07:40 PM Kansas City Fed President Schmid (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid will give a speech on the economic and monetary policy outlook at an event in Oklahoma City, OK. Text, Q&A, and livestream are expected.

Tuesday, February 27

  • 08:30 AM Durable goods orders, January preliminary (GS -6.0%, consensus -5.0%, last flat); Durable goods orders ex-transportation, January preliminary (GS flat, consensus +0.2%, last +0.5%); Core capital goods orders, January preliminary (GS -0.1%, consensus +0.1%, last +0.2%) ;Core capital goods shipments, January preliminary (GS +0.1%, consensus +0.2%, last flat): We estimate that durable goods orders fell 6.0% in the preliminary January report (mom sa), reflecting a lull in commercial aircraft orders that more than offsets a rebound in the defense category. We forecast soft details as well, including a 0.1% decline in core capital goods orders reflecting an end-of-year lull in global manufacturing activity and scope for order cancellations at the start of the year.
  • 09:00 AM FHFA house price index, December (consensus +0.3%, last +0.3%)
  • 09:00 AM S&P Case-Shiller 20-city home price index, December (GS +0.1%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.15%)
  • 09:05 AM Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Barr speaks: Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr speaks at the Conference on Counterparty Credit Risk Management. Speech text and livestream are expected. On February 14, Barr said, “As Chair Powell indicated in his most recent press conference, my FOMC colleagues and I are confident we are on a path to 2% inflation, but we need to see continued good data before we can begin the process of reducing the federal funds rate. I fully support what he called a careful approach to considering policy normalization given current conditions…Given the limited historical experience with the growth and inflation dynamics we currently face, and no modern experience of emerging from a global pandemic, we have yet another reason to proceed carefully, as we have been doing.”
  • 10:00 AM Conference Board consumer confidence, February (GS 114.6, consensus 115.0, last 114.8)
  • 10:00 AM Richmond Fed manufacturing index, February (consensus -8, last -15)

Wednesday, February 28

  • 08:30 AM GDP, Q4 second release (GS +3.4%, consensus +3.3%, last +3.3%); Personal consumption, Q4 second release (GS +2.8%, consensus +2.7%, last +2.8%): We estimate a 0.1pp upward revision to Q4 GDP growth to +3.4% (qoq ar), reflecting upward revisions to government spending and healthcare consumption, partially offset by downward revisions to inventory investment, consumer goods spending, and recreation categories.
  • 08:30 AM Advance goods trade balance, January (GS -$86.0bn, consensus -$88.3bn, last -$87.9bn)
  • 08:30 AM Wholesale inventories, January preliminary (consensus +0.2%, last +0.4%)
  • 12:00 PM Atlanta Fed President Bostic (FOMC voter) speaks: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic will answer questions on the economic outlook and monetary policy at a fireside chat in Roswell, GA. Q&A is expected. On February 16, when discussing when to begin cutting the fed funds rate, Bostic said, “A year ago, six months ago, I was in the fourth quarter. So, we’ve seen tremendous progress, and I’m hopeful that that continues. If that continues, I’ll be willing to pull it forward even further.” He added that he could “for sure” see three cuts instead of the two he anticipated in the latest Summary of Economic Projections. On February 15, Bostic said, “The evidence from data, our surveys, and our outreach says that victory is not clearly in hand and leaves me not yet comfortable that inflation is inexorably declining to our 2% objective. That may be true for some time, even if the January CPI report turns out to be an aberration…I require more confidence before declaring victory in this fight for price stability…My expectation is that the rate of inflation will continue to decline, but more slowly than the pace implied by where the markets signal monetary policy should be…Right now, a strong labor market and macroeconomy offer the chance to execute these policy decisions without oppressive urgency.”
  • 12:15 PM Boston Fed President Collins (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Boston Fed President Susan Collins will give remarks, participate in a fireside chat, and take audience questions in an event hosted by the Center for Business, Government & Society. Speech text, Q&A, and livestream are expected. On February 7, Collins said, “Seeing sustained, broadening signs of progress should provide the necessary confidence I would need to begin a methodical adjustment to our policy stance…it will likely become appropriate to begin easing policy restraint later this year…a methodical, forward-looking strategy that eases policy gradually will provide the flexibility to manage risks, while promoting stable prices and maximum employment.”
  • 12:45 PM New York Fed President Williams (FOMC voter) speaks: New York Fed President John Williams will deliver keynote remarks at the Long Island Association Regional Economic Briefing. Speech text, Q&A with media, and livestream are expected. On February 23, Williams said, “At some point, I think it will be appropriate to pull back on restrictive monetary policy, likely later this year. But it’s really about reading that data and looking for consistent signs that inflation is not only coming down but is moving towards that 2% longer-run goal.” He added, “Rate hikes are not my base case. But clearly, if fundamentally the economic outlook changes in a material, significant way — either with inflation not showing signs of moving toward the 2% longer-run goal on a sustained basis or other indicators that monetary policy is not having the needed or desired effects in order to achieve that goal — then you have to rethink that.”

Thursday, February 29

  • 08:30 AM Personal income, January (GS +0.5%, consensus +0.4%, last +0.3%); Personal spending, January (GS -0.1%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.7%); PCE price index (mom), January (GS +0.36%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.2%); PCE price index (yoy), January (GS +2.39%, consensus +2.4%, last +2.6%); Core PCE price index (mom), January (GS +0.43%, consensus +0.4%, last +0.2%); Core PCE price index (yoy), January (GS +2.85%, consensus +2.8%, last +2.9%): We estimate that personal spending declined 0.1% and that personal income increased 0.5% in January. We estimate that the core PCE price index rose 0.43% in January, corresponding to a year-over-year rate of +2.85%. Additionally, we expect that the headline PCE price index rose 0.36%, or +2.39% from a year earlier. Our forecast is consistent with a 0.22% increase in our trimmed core PCE measure for January (vs. 0.20% in December and 0.12% in November).
  • 08:30 AM Initial jobless claims, week ended February 24 (GS 200k, consensus 210k, last 201k); Continuing jobless claims, week ended February 17 (GS 1,860k, consensus 1,874k, last 1,862k)
  • 10:00 AM Pending home sales, January (GS +1.0%, consensus +1.1%, last +8.3%)
  • 10:50 AM Atlanta Fed President Bostic (FOMC voter) speaks: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic will participate in a fireside chat at the 2024 Banking Outlook Conference on the economic outlook, monetary policy, and state of the banking industry. Q&A and Livestream are expected.
  • 11:00 AM Kansas City Fed manufacturing index, February (last -9)
  • 11:00 AM Chicago Fed President Goolsbee (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee will join a virtual event for remarks on “Monetary Policy at an Unusual Time.” Q&A and livestream are expected. On February 14, Goolsbee said, “Let’s not get amped up on one month of CPI that was higher than it was expected to be…If you see inflation go up a little bit that doesn’t mean that we’re not on the target to get to 2%. We can still be on the path even if we have some increases and some ups and downs…so let’s not get too flipped out.” On February 5, Goolsbee said, “We’ve had seven months of really quite good inflation reports, right around or even below the Fed’s target. So if we just keep getting more data like what we have gotten, I believe that we should well be on the path to normalization.”
  • 01:15 PM Cleveland Fed President Mester (FOMC voter) speaks: Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester will speak at the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs and Bank Policy Institute’s 2024 Bank Regulation Research Conference. Text and Q&A are expected. On February 6, Mester said, “It would be a mistake to move rates down too soon or too quickly without sufficient evidence that inflation was on a sustainable and timely path back to 2%. If the economy evolves as expected, I think we will gain that confidence later this year, and then we can begin moving rates down.”
  • 08:10 PM New York Fed President Williams (FOMC voter) speaks: New York Fed President John Williams will participate in a moderated discussion at an event hosted by the Citizens Budget Commission. Q&A and livestream are expected.

Friday, March 1

  • 09:45 AM S&P Global US manufacturing PMI, February final (consensus 51.5, last 51.5)
  • 10:00 AM Construction spending, January (GS +0.6%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.9%)
  • 10:00 AM University of Michigan consumer sentiment, February final (GS 79.2, consensus 79.6, last 79.6); University of Michigan 5-10-year inflation expectations, February final (GS 2.9%, consensus 2.9%, last 2.9%): We estimate the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index declined to 79.2 in the final February reading and estimate the report’s measure of long-term inflation expectations will be unrevised at 2.9%.
  • 10:00 AM ISM manufacturing index, February (GS 49.1, consensus 49.5, last 49.1): We estimate the ISM manufacturing index was unchanged at 49.1 in February, as negative residual seasonality offsets a rebound in global manufacturing activity and in other business surveys. Our GS manufacturing tracker rose 4.2pt to 50.4.
  • 10:15 AM Fed Governor Waller and Dallas Fed President Logan (FOMC non-voter) speak: Fed Governor Christopher Waller and Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan will each respond to a paper titled “Quantitative Tightening Around the Globe: What Have We Learned?” at the 2024 US Monetary Policy Forum in New York. Speech text and Q&A are expected. On February 22, Waller said, “The strength of the economy and the recent data we have received on inflation mean it is appropriate to be patient, careful, methodical, deliberative – pick your favorite synonym. Whatever word you pick, they all translate to one idea: What’s the rush?” He added, “I am going to need to see a couple more months of inflation data to be sure that January was a fluke and that we are still on track to price stability…My conjecture is that, in the absence of a major economic shock, delaying rate cuts by a few months should not have a substantial impact on the real economy in the near term. And I think I have shown that acting too soon could squander our progress in inflation and risk considerable harm to the economy.” On January 6, Logan said, “If we don’t maintain sufficiently tight financial conditions, there is a risk that inflation will pick back up and reverse the progress we’ve made…In light of the easing in financial conditions in recent months, we shouldn’t take the possibility of another rate increase off the table just yet.”
  • 12:15 PM Atlanta Fed President Bostic (FOMC voter) speaks: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic will speak in a moderated conversation on topics including the economic outlook and real estate trends at a conference in Orlando. Q&A is expected.
  • 01:30 PM San Francisco Fed President Daly (FOMC voter) speaks: San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly will participate in a panel discussion on “AI & the Labor Market” at the 2024 US Monetary Policy Forum, moderated by Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid. Text and Q&A are expected. On February 16, Daly said, “To finish the job will take fortitude. We will need to resist the temptation to act quickly when patience is needed and be prepared to respond agilely as the economy evolves…Price stability is within sight. But there is more work to do.” Daly added that three 25bps cuts to the fed funds rate was a “reasonable baseline.”
  • 03:30 PM Fed Governor Kugler speaks: Fed Governor Adriana Kugler will speak about pursuing the dual mandate at the 2024 Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Economic Summit. Speech text, Q&A, and livestream are expected. On February 7, Kugler said, “At some point, the continued cooling of inflation and labor markets may make it appropriate to reduce the target range for the federal funds rate. On the other hand, if progress on disinflation stalls, it may be appropriate to hold the target range steady at its current level for longer to ensure continued progress on our dual mandate.”
  • 05:00 PM Lightweight motor vehicle sales, February (GS 15.3mn, consensus 15.4mn, last 15.0mn)

Source: DB, BofA, Goldman

Tyler Durden
Mon, 02/26/2024 – 10:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/dXojxE8 Tyler Durden