VA Denies Removal Of Iconic WWII Kissing Photo After Rogue Woke Memo Circulates

VA Denies Removal Of Iconic WWII Kissing Photo After Rogue Woke Memo Circulates

The top official at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has denied rumors that an iconic WWII of a US Navy Sailor kissing a woman in Times Square will be removed.

“Let me be clear: This image is not banned from VA facilities – and we will keep it in VA facilities,” wrote VA Secretary Denis McDonough in a post to X.

McDonough was responding to a memo written by RimaAnn Nelson, who serves as the assistant undersecretary for health for operations at the VA’s Health Network sub-agency, who – according to the maybe real memo, directed regional officials to remove teh photo from all health facilities “to foster a more trauma-informed environment.”

A screenshot obtained by the DCNF appears to show an email sent out by the Office of the Assistant Under Secretary of Health for Operations’ communications team to an listserv of Veterans Integrated Services Networks directors announcing the policy change.

The email’s subject line is “Operational memorandum: Removal and Replacement of ‘V-J Day in Times Square’ Photographs” and the email is dated Feb. 29, 2024.

“The Office of the Assistant Under Secretary of Health for Operations is sending the attached memorandum … on behalf of the VHA, Assault and Harassment Prevention Office,” the email states, directing recipients to share the memo with leaders of their respective VA medical centers. -Daily Caller

Nelson suggested that the kiss was ‘non-consensual,’ and violates the VA’s policies toward sexual harrassment and assault, she said in the memo. “However, perspectives on historical events and their representations evolve.”

“The placement of this photograph in VA facilities was intended to celebrate and commemorate the end of World War II and the triumphant return of American soldiers,” wrote Nelson.

The photo was taken by Life magazine photographer Alfred Eisenstaedt, who captured the iconic photograph of sailer George Mendonsa kissing a nurse named Greta Zimmer Friedman on Aug. 14, 1945.

Here’s where it gets interesting – “A memo was sent out that should not have been, and it has been rescinded,” a VA official told the Daily Caller.

In short – a rogue woke sub-agency employee decreed that the photo be removed, never ran it up the flagpole, and was just shut down by leadership.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 13:10

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/C9hqiN2 Tyler Durden

Boeing, Boeing, Gone: US Factory Orders Plunge Most Since COVID Lockdowns In January

Boeing, Boeing, Gone: US Factory Orders Plunge Most Since COVID Lockdowns In January

US factory orders crashed  3.6% MoM in January, notably worse than the 2.9% MoM decline expected and worse still that December’s 0.2% MoM rise was revised to a 0.3% decline. This didappointment pulled orders down 2.0% YoY – the worst annual decline since Sept 2020…

Source: Bloomberg

And on a core (ex-transports) basis, orders also disappointed, down 0.8% MoM (vs -0.1% MoM exp), dragging the core orders down 1.6% YoY…

Source: Bloomberg

January saw the biggest plunge in non-defense aircraft & parts (Boeing) since April 2019 (but we’re building lots of boats)…

Source: Bloomberg

Interestingly January also saw a surge in metalworking machinery manufacturing while ferrous metal foundries orders crashed…

Source: Bloomberg

But we can thank the good old Military Industrial Complex for orders not being more of a shitshow as Defense spending jumped 24% MoM…

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, it’s that same old issue again… downward revisions!! In the last 21 months, US factory orders have been downwardly revised 16 times…

Source: Bloomberg

Bidenomics – make it up as you go along – continues.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 13:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/conxyZO Tyler Durden

Watch: Kirby Refuses To Explain Why Biden Has Never Spoken To Border Patrol Heads

Watch: Kirby Refuses To Explain Why Biden Has Never Spoken To Border Patrol Heads

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

White House National Security Communications director John Kirby refused Monday to provide an explanation as to why Joe Biden has never spoken to the former or current heads of the Border Patrol until last week.

During a Fox News interview, anchor Martha MacCallum repeatedly asked Kirby to address comments by former Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz who recently slammed Biden, claiming he never even picked up the phone to speak to Ortiz in the two years he was overseeing 21,000 agents.

“How is that possible?” MacCallum asked, to which Kirby responded that Biden is “engaged” with all border agents involved with the Department of Homeland Security.

Kirby attempted to shift the conversation to blaming Republicans for the border crisis before MacCallum steered him back to the topic at hand.

The host noted that Biden only spoke with the current Chief of Border Patrol, Jason Owens, for the first time on Thursday, noting “From what we can find out they have never spoken before that. How is that possible?”

“The president’s engaged with DHS, he’s engaged with leadership there —” Kirby again stated.

“But why not the Border Patrol?” MacCallum interjected.

“He’s engaged with the Border Patrol, Martha, he was just down there in Brownsville meeting and talking with those folks directly and hearing about the situation on the ground,” Kirby again said, as if he didn’t understand the question.

“But he never met with the former or current chief. The current chief he just met, he’s been president for three years, [he] just met him the other day,” MacCallum pressed.

“He, again, is engaged with everybody in DHS, including Border Patrol, down there in Brownsville talking to them on the ground, hearing from them directly about what their concerns are,” Kirby claimed.

Watch:

Incredible.

Kirby is acting completely dumb as if he doesn’t understand basic questions because there is absolutely no recourse for the inaction of the Biden administration on the border.

As we noted earlier the White House has now been forced to admit that thousands of illegal immigrants from foreign countries were directly flown into at least 43 different American airports from January through December 2023 in a secret effort to make the numbers crossing the border appear lower.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 12:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ukqDGJ1 Tyler Durden

Victoria Nuland Leaving Post While Ukraine On The Ropes, US Policy In Shambles

Victoria Nuland Leaving Post While Ukraine On The Ropes, US Policy In Shambles

Ukraine forces are in retreat and the war is going badly from NATO’s perspective, Biden’s $60+ billion for Kiev is halted in the House, and the Democratic incumbent’s reelection chances are looking grim in November. And as if confirming there’s no light at the end of the tunnel, Victoria Nuland is stepping down as Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs of the United States.

The State Department announced Tuesday morning she is retiring. The Associated Press announcement interestingly enough underscores her hawkish legacy on Russia and Ukraine. “Victoria Nuland, the third-highest ranking U.S. diplomat and frequent target of criticism for her hawkish views on Russia and its actions in Ukraine, will leave her post this month, the State Department said Tuesday,” it wrote.

Her boss Antony Blinken said something a bit ironic on the occasion of unveiling her departure: “But it’s Toria’s leadership on Ukraine that diplomats and students of foreign policy will study for years to come.”

Indeed, many already know her as Victoria-‘Fuck the EU’-Nuland and for essentially running foreign policy in Europe, stretching back through the Obama years as then Assistant Secretary of State for Europe, where many of the problems which sparked the disastrous and tragic Russia-Ukraine war were first set in motion.

According to more praise from Secretary Blinken:

“Her efforts have been indispensable to confronting Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, marshaling a global coalition to ensure his strategic failure, and helping Ukraine work toward the day when it will be able to stand strongly on its own feet – democratically, economically, and militarily.”

Of course, Blinken’s boldly declaring Russia’s “strategic failure” seems a bit forced and premature (to put it mildly), considering too that even from a propaganda angle leading NATO countries are currently very much on the defensive. Things simply aren’t going well in NATO-land, by many accounts. 

Even The Guardian is now singing a very different tune, listing off serious policy failures and disasters for the West:

Western Europe has no conceivable interest in escalating the Ukraine war through a long-range missile exchange. While it should sustain its logistical support for Ukrainian forces, it has no strategic interest in Kyiv’s desire to drive Russia out of the majority Russian-speaking areas of Crimea or Donbas. It has every interest in assiduously seeking an early settlement and starting the rebuilding of Ukraine.

As for the west’s “soft power” sanctions on Russia, they have failed miserably, disrupting the global trading economy in the process. Sanctions may be beloved of western diplomats and thinktanks. They may even hurt someone – not least Britain’s energy users – but they have not devastated the Russian economy or changed Putin’s mind. This year Russia’s growth rate is expected to exceed Britain’s.

The crass ineptitude of a quarter of a century of western military interventions should have taught us some lessons. Apparently not.

Just over a week ago, she was talking about “tightening the noose” around Putin to CNN

…But it appears she’ll never get the chance while in top State Dept office.

The Washington Post meanwhile recalls a particularly funny past moment and Russia’s reaction which centered on Nuland:

Former Secretary of State John Kerry has recalled on numerous times that when Nuland left the spokeswoman’s job during his tenure to become the top diplomat for Europe, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov congratulated him for “getting rid of that woman.” Kerry said he replied to Lavrov that he didn’t get rid of her, “I promoted her.”

Current Secretary of State Antony Blinken praised Nuland for her three and a half decades of public service and thanked her for her role in shaping U.S. policy around the world under six presidents and 10 secretaries of state.

At this point we might say she’s wisely choosing to “quit while ahead”… but the reality of her disastrous interventionist policies in Eastern Europe is something more like quitting while you’re behind.

Nuland’s temporary replacement for under secretary upon her retirement has been announced as career diplomat John Bass, a former ambassador to Afghanistan. He is currently in the position of the undersecretary of state for management.

* * *

Nuland has had a lot of “quiet part out loud” deep state admission moments over the years…

Recall too that she ran point for Obama’s regime change “democracy promotion” efforts in Ukraine. In 2014 leaked audio clip posted to YouTube caused deep embarrassment for the State Department amid accusations the US was coordinating coup efforts using the ongoing “Maidan Revolution” to oust then President Viktor Yanukovych.

In that leaked phone call Nuland told US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt “F*ck the EU” – for which she was later forced to apologize. Here’s some of the audio for a little trip down memory lane:

She had also been instrumental in her prior postings at the State Department in Obama’s disastrous Libya intervention. During her initial ‘retirement’ during the Trump years, she had been part of various think tanks, including the hawkish Brookings Institution, where she was a fierce critic of Trump’s supposed “appeasement” of Putin. She’s also long argued for deeper military intervention in Syria

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 12:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/qBU84ub Tyler Durden

“While The Market Is Not Yet In Bubble Territory, Tech May Already Be”

“While The Market Is Not Yet In Bubble Territory, Tech May Already Be”

By Simon White, Bloomberg markets live reporter and strategist

Fearlessness Is Carelessness in This Bull Market

It’s getting a bit “number go up” in US equities. Despite the incessant advance, there are still several tailwinds to keep the rally intact. But that does not mean investors should become blasé, with a number of similarities emerging between the current market and the Dotcom bust in the 2000s.

Bulls versus bears in stocks slug it out with much more intensity than in bonds or other markets (except perhaps for gold). But bull markets can be particularly inflammatory as they have a habit of persisting for much longer than many believe possible. Whether you think that’s a good thing or not, it is what it is.

Nonetheless, even the most fervent bulls should be acutely aware that they are on a frozen lake, where they could be walking on thin ice long before the surface betrays any signs of it.

The ice might be showing early signs of weakening, with several examples of market over-extension developing that investors should be mindful of. Three of the most notable are:

  • More stocks with higher P/Es than at the 2000 peak
  • The household sector is more overweight equities than it was at the Dotcom top
  • Idiosyncratic behavior in the tech sector is driving a wedge between high dispersion in the S&P and low implied volatility, similar to the late 1990s

Start with valuations. The S&P’s P/E ratio was around 30 in early 2000, versus about 25 today. But as always, weighted averages mask what is going on under the surface. If we look at the distribution of P/Es across the index, today’s market is similar to the 2000 peak, except that the current distribution has a fatter right tail, i.e. there are more stocks with P/Es higher than the average.

Valuation is about as much use as a helicopter ejector seat when it comes to timing, but as overvalued stocks become more widespread it means when the market does start to sell off it is primed to be more pronounced.

As in any bull market, there are those who are late to the party and start buying only when they can’t take the FOMO any more. That was certainly the case in the 1990s when it seemed if every man and his dog was a tech utopian and a budding Warren Buffett.

However, the household sector in the US is more invested in equities, relative to its total holdings in financial assets, than it was in 2000.

That’s not good for the market outlook. The chart below takes the household allocation to equities above and inverts it and pushes it forward by ten years, and adds the 10-year rolling return for the S&P. As can be seen, high household allocations to stocks is a portent of poor long-term returns. This highlights that even if the bull market persists for a while yet, it is unlikely to be one with especially juicy returns (even more so in real terms).

Of more concern is the growing gap between dispersion and implied volatility. Dispersion measures the difference between individual stocks’ variance and that of the index. Dispersion is high at the moment as some stocks, mainly in the tech sector, have a high variance, while the index overall does not.

When dispersion is high, selling it is attractive, i.e. selling index vol and buying vol on individual stocks. That has the effect of pinning the index, which means that as the AI-theme keeps driving tech stocks higher, the remaining stocks in the index must fall, dampening the overall correlation, and in turn keeping index vol capped.

A similar gap between dispersion and the VIX opened up in the late 1990s and early 2000s as tech was skyrocketing while the rest of the market was comparatively serene. As S&P Global puts it, dispersion captures periods where only a portion of the market bubbles or crashes.

This is not a sign of an imminent decline, but it shows that while the market is not yet in bubble territory, the tech sector may already be.

Nevertheless, there are some potent tailwinds still in play for today’s market. Most important is excess liquidity, the difference between real money growth and economic growth. That is still elevated and rising, and points to further advances in the stock market over the next 3-6 months. Excess liquidity in the time of the tech bubble, on the other hand, had begun to turn down in early 1999, more than a year before the market topped.

Much has been said about concentration risk, with a handful of stocks driving returns and accounting for a disproportionate size of the index. But that alone has not historically led to market underperformance. Further, the largest US stocks’ market cap is actually falling relative to the global total. This measure spiked to 9.5% at the market peak in 2000, but is lower at 8% today and falling.

More importantly, the largest stocks today are longer-established businesses with more solid records on revenue and earnings growth. In the late 1990s, the largest seven US stocks accounted for 7-10% of S&P 500 earnings. Today that proportion is closer to 18% and is climbing.

In the late 1990s, there were companies IPO-ing with no revenue or earnings, and which hadn’t been around long. Companies like Nvidia and Microsoft have long track records and viable businesses. Moreover, there are signs of AI-infrastructure build-out beginning to broaden the range of the firms benefiting from the new technology. The stock prices of AI firms will suffer if heightened expectations don’t match up to reality, but they are very unlikely to go to zero, as happened to many companies in the Dotcom bust.

Still, there are undoubtedly signs of excess across markets. Bitcoin is trying to re-exit the Earth’s atmosphere, now close to its all-time highs. In crypto overall, people are starting to buy and close their eyes, with the re-emergence of ever more deranged ways to suck up willing liquidity (yes you, Dogwifhat). Private credit is another area that should give any asset bull pause for concern, given its opacity and the likelihood some of the shoddiest loans are coalescing there, away from the market’s prying eyes.

Stocks are short-term overbought, yet there are few reasons to suggest they won’t keep grinding higher with excess liquidity as a support over the medium term (3-6 months). Nonetheless, there is a rising number of reasons discussed above that should unnerve bulls. Fortunately, downside hedges have been cheapening as implied vol falls, with a 5000 strike put on the S&P expiring at the end of the year costing a little more than 3%.

Fearlessness is carelessness. Bulls walking across the ice should start to watch their step more closely.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 12:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/8Xc2pfh Tyler Durden

Facebook, Instagram Hit With Outage Across US

Facebook, Instagram Hit With Outage Across US

A major outage appears to have rocked Meta’s social media platforms on Tuesday morning across the US. 

Folks report that both Instagram and Facebook display “failure to load” error pages.

According to the outage tracking website Downdetector, Facebook, Instagram, and Messenger began experiencing disruptions around 1000 ET. 

Facebook outages are being reported in New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and other major metro areas in the US. 

The status and outages of Meta business products are listed below:

*This story is developing… 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 10:59

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/NDBF23M Tyler Durden

Why gold might (weirdly) be a contrarian investment right now

It’s hard to say with a straight face that an asset hovering near its all-time high could be a “contrarian” investment. But I’m going to say it anyhow– I think gold may be a contrarian play right now.

Now, it would be easy to assume that gold is near its all-time high because everyone is buying. And normally that would be true; typically, whenever an asset soars to a record high, it’s because individual investors are piling into the market.

We’ve seen this countless times, from Bitcoin to meme stocks; once something becomes the hot thing to own, small investors– and occasionally professionally managed funds– drive the price higher.

But that’s not happening with gold. In fact, investors have been abandoning gold for years.

Publicly available data from more than 100 gold ETFs (all of which are conveniently aggregated by the World Gold Council) show that western investors have been selling off their gold ETFs for most of the past few years.

WGC data show that North American and European investors dumped over 700 metric tons of gold since May of 2022, equivalent to nearly 20% of ETF holdings.

In fact, outflows for the month of January alone (the most recent month of published data) totaled more than 50 metric tons– the second highest outflow in a year.

Most notably, however, North American, and European investors dumped 179.6 metric tons of gold September 2023 through January 2024.

This is important, because during that time period, the price of gold surged from $1820 per ounce to nearly $2100.

Strange, right? If investors were selling off substantial quantities of gold, it seems like the price should have fallen. Instead, it rose 15%. How is that possible?

Well, the reason that gold keeps going higher is because, while individual investors are selling, there’s another group that’s buying.

In fact, this group of buyers is completely price insensitive. They don’t care how much they pay per ounce. They are not even looking for a return on investment. And they have mountains of cash to spend.

The group of buyers I’m talking about is central banks and governments.

And not just the usual suspects like China and Russia either (though China did buy more than 200 metric tons in 2023). Other like Poland, India, Singapore, Czech Republic, Philippines… and even Iraq.

To me this is an obvious signal that the global financial system is probably going to change sooner rather than later. And long-time readers know we have been writing about this for years.

Reserve currencies throughout history have always come and gone.

There was a time when the Greek drachma dominated trade and commerce in the Mediterranean (due in large part to the conquests of Alexander the Great). It was displaced by the Roman denarius, then the Byzantine gold solidus, then the Venetian ducat.

Reserve currencies rise to prominence because people have confidence in the issuer, i.e. the Roman Empire, or the Republic of Venice, or the Spanish Empire.

But eventually that confidence wanes– especially as the empire debases its currency and runs up massive debts.

That’s the situation the United States is in right now.

The national debt is already $34.4 trillion. And the Congressional Budget Office expects it to rise by at least $20 trillion over the next decade.

The dollar became the global reserve currency back in 1944 when there were no other nations to rival the US.

The US was the only country that hadn’t been completely obliterated by war. It boasted the largest, freest, most productive economy. It possessed the best technology and manufacturing capacity. It had the largest pool of savings.

And it also had one of the world’s largest and most rapidly growing populations.

Yet even with such an impressive socioeconomic resume, the rest of the world wasn’t willing to blindly trust the US government with the world’s reserve currency… not without first putting some critical checks and balances in place.

First, while other nations agreed to fix their currencies to the US dollar, the US agreed to fix the dollar to gold at a rate of $35 per troy ounce.

And second, the US government had to guarantee that the dollar would be freely convertible to gold; that way, if any nation ever lost confidence in the Treasury Department or Federal Reserve, they could easily redeem their dollars for gold.

This is a pretty critical point to understand: immediately following World War II, the US was at the peak of its power. Every other developed nation on earth had been devastated by the war. Farms and factories had been destroyed. Chaos and hunger were rampant. Entire governments had been toppled.

Yet even with such a tremendous power imbalance (i.e. the US was in pristine condition compared to Europe), allied nations still weren’t willing to go all-in on the US dollar. And they demanded the gold convertibility as a guarantee.

That was 80 years ago. And it’s safe to say that the US is nowhere near the peak of its geopolitical power anymore. Adversary nations are everywhere, and the US government’s finances are an embarrassing catastrophe.

When I see central banks buying up gold at record high prices, this suggests to me that they are preparing for a new global financial system– one that is based on gold instead of the US dollar.

After all, this is the most logical scenario.

It would be naive (and deliberately ignorant of history) to believe that the dollar will go on indefinitely as the world’s dominant reserve currency, given the pitiful trend of US government finances. Even the IMF has called for a reset in the global financial system.

It’s also hard to believe that any new financial system would be centered on a Chinese currency; no one trusts the CCP, nor should they.

Gold is the most viable option to replace the dollar as the global reserve because it doesn’t require any convincing. Governments and central banks all over the world already own gold, just as they have for thousands of years.

And it’s a lot easier for everyone to have confidence in an asset class that no single nation controls.

Given the trend of their large-scale gold purchases, it appears that foreign governments and central banks may be preparing for this potential new financial system.

I’ve argued before that a gold-based financial system could send prices beyond $10,000 or more.

So, yes, even though gold is near a record high, it’s important to remember that individual investors are selling at a time when central banks are gobbling it up even more quickly.

And it’s possible they’re buying for a very deliberate reason.

Source

from Schiff Sovereign https://ift.tt/UM12lsb
via IFTTT

Far-Left “Eco-Terrorists” Attack German Power Grid, Causing Outage At Tesla’s Gigafactory

Far-Left “Eco-Terrorists” Attack German Power Grid, Causing Outage At Tesla’s Gigafactory

A far-left militant/environmental group, known as “Vulkangruppe” (Volcano Group), has claimed responsibility for an attack on Germany’s electricity infrastructure on Tuesday, paralyzing vehicle production at Tesla’s European Gigafactory near Berlin. 

Police in the state of Brandenburg said someone set fire to a nearby high-voltage tower, causing a blaze that cut off electricity to the Gigafactory and more than 60,000 people in the surrounding area. 

A Tesla spokesperson confirmed to Reuters that the attack on the grid caused a power outage at the factory, resulting in a production halt. The spokesperson added that the site was evacuated. 

“We sabotaged Tesla today. Because Tesla in Grünau eats up earth, resources, people, labor and spits out 6,000 SUVs, killing machines and monster trucks per week. Our gift for March 8th is to shut down Tesla. Because the complete destruction of the Gigafactory and with it the sawing off of “technofascists” like Elend Musk are a step on the path to liberation from patriarchy,” the eco-terrorist wrote in a 2,500-word attack on Tesla. 

On X, CEO Elon Musk responded to the incident by saying: 

“These are either the dumbest eco-terrorists on Earth or they’re puppets of those who don’t have good environmental goals. Stopping production of electric vehicles, rather than fossil fuel vehicles, ist extrem dumm.”

Tesla shares in New York were down about 2.5% in the early morning cash session. 

Meanwhile, there are environmental protesters near the Gigafactory… 

Why are eco-terrorists attacking Tesla when it’s claimed by these groups that electric vehicles will save the planet from imminent climate doom? Or is it this eco-terrorist group is being weaponized by dark money to go after Musk for his ‘free-speech’ platform X that goes against the censorship-industrial complex in the West?

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 10:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/fcG1Vbp Tyler Durden

Bitcoin Takes Out All-Time High, Briefly Topping Silver’s Market Cap

Bitcoin Takes Out All-Time High, Briefly Topping Silver’s Market Cap

And… lambos sold out until 2026…

Following yesterday’s resurgence in net inflows (+$562 million) into spot bitcoin ETFs…

Source: Bloomberg

“The excitement and hype around the ETFs has ended up being far beyond anyone’s expectations,” said Jad Comair, founder of digital asset investor Melanion Capital.

Spot bitcoin ETFs give investors the ability to gain direct exposure to the cryptocurrency without the risks associated with largely unregulated crypto exchanges.

Bitcoin prices have topped $69,000

Source: Bloomberg

Taking out November 2021’s record high…

Source: Bloomberg

However, as @AutismCapital noted on X:

Reminder that the autistic (correct) ATH adjusted for inflation is $79,000 so make sure to celebrate then as well because at that number your purchasing power will be what it was at the previous ATH.”

CoinTelegraph reports that following the new high, Bitcoin briefly became the eighth-largest asset in the world after its market capitalization briefly overtook the $1.347 trillion market capitalization of silver, the second-largest precious metal in the world, according to CompaniesMarketCap data.

“Breaking all-time highs, with the current momentum in spot ETFs as well as the upcoming halving narrative, would likely awaken true FOMO — fear of missing out — among participants currently watching markets from the sidelines,” said Stefan von Haenisch, head of trading at OSL SG Pte.

And so where from here?

As CoinTelegraph’s Zoltan Vardai reports, while Bitcoin’s pre-halving rallies are historically profitable for investors, analysts expect the biggest gains to come after the halving, with some eyeing $130,000 to $180,000 by the end of 2025.

Bitcoin’s 4-year halving cycles are widely associated with the subsequent crypto market bull runs that generally lead to new Bitcoin all-time highs. But is the much-awaited halving the right time to invest in the world’s largest cryptocurrency?

Based on historical Bitcoin price data, the halvings could be a great time to buy for investors with longer time horizons, according to Vetle Lunde, a senior analyst at K33 Research. Lunde told Cointelegraph:

“While the immediate post-halving performance has tended to be sluggish, each halving has proven to be a solid point to enter the market. 150-400 days after the halving tends to be the sweet spot where the compounding effects of subdued miner selling pressure impact BTC positively directionally.”

Bitcoin breached the $60,000 mark for the first time in over two years on Feb. 28, 47 days before the halving, and the world’s first cryptocurrency is up 30% over the past week.

The Bitcoin halving halves the rate at which new BTC are issued into circulation every four years. The network will stop producing new Bitcoin once 21 million coins are created by the year 2140, which will be the year of the last Bitcoin halving.

According to Bryan Legend, investor and CEO of Hectic Labs, the pre-halving period can be a profitable time to hold Bitcoin. He told Cointelegraph:

“The pre-Halving leading up to the actual Halving event is a great time to realize gains. The pre-Halving rally turns investor sentiment into a new bull cycle but timing the market to know when to get out at the top is extremely challenging.”

Bitcoin’s pre-halving rally to the $67,611 mark was largely assisted by record inflows in the 10 new spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States. 

According to CoinShares analyst James Butterfill, 

“Total assets under management (AuM), after recent price rises, are now very close to the all-time high at US $82.6bn, just shy of the US $86bn peak set early November.”

According to the report, Bitcoin accounted for “94% of the inflows” at $1.72 billion, as U.S.-based funds continued to dominate with net inflows totaling $1.88 billion.

Sergei Gorev, a risk manager at fintech platform YouHodler, said that Bitcoin ETF inflows are a significant part of the current rally, along with the pre-halving anticipation. He told Cointelegraph:

“Spot Bitcoin ETFs buy 10 times more Bitcoin daily than miners produce each day.”

Can Bitcoin price reach $120,000 by the end of 2024?

Bitcoin price typically rallies into the halving but sees a consolidation immediately after the halving, according to K33 Research’s Lunde. He said:

“The pre-halving rally stems from a combination of traders buying in advance and miners holding onto a larger portion of its rewards. In the direct aftermath of the halving, hashrate tends to plunge, block production stalls from 10 to 15-25 minutes, leading uncertainty to grow.”

However, Lunde only expects a brief correction, before Bitcoin resumes its price rally to new all-time highs.

“Based purely on data from past performance and the diminishing impact of halving rallies, Bitcoin could see a 130-150% rally in the year following the halving, which would lead to a peak in the range of $125,000 – $150,000 in 2025.”

All-time Bitcoin chart, incl. Halvings. Source: Bitbo

Bitcoin’s end-of-year price could reach around $80,000 to $85,000 in the worst case and $120,000 to $130,000 in the bullish case, according to Hectic Labs’ CEO, Bryan Legend. He told Cointelegraph that this will mainly depend on macroeconomic conditions:

“ [The 2025 bull market] will be dependent on the state of financial markets and the fundamental outlook on the world… If the bull market does carry through into 2025, we may indeed see higher prices with a BTC top of $180,000 – $200,000.”

Finally, we note that a big sell order hit right as Bitcoin took out the record highs…

Which prompted some mockery…

To the moon?

Not only is it best performing asset, up 62% YTD, it also has the highest sharpe ratio of any asset class…

We now have to wait with baited breath to hear what Jim Cramer thinks, but here’s JPMorgan:

“The current backdrop looks similar to the exuberant backdrop of 2021 when retail investors were driving both a crypto and equity market rally simultaneously on momentum,” said JPMorgan analyst Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, who cautioned that there was a “high risk of profit-taking” ahead of next month’s bitcoin halving event.

But, SMCI up 250% in a month is not at all like the dotcom bubble, right?

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 10:24

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/vtiKIhk Tyler Durden

US Services Surveys Signal Stagflation In Feb: Higher Prices, Slower Growth

US Services Surveys Signal Stagflation In Feb: Higher Prices, Slower Growth

After the mixed Manufacturing survey picture (ISM puked, PMI spiked), who knows what we’ll get from the Services surveys today.

  • S&P Global’s Services PMI fell from 52.5 in January to 52.3 (final) in February, but we note that is up from the 51.3 preliminary print in early Feb.

  • ISM’s Services survey also fell from 53.4 in January to 52.6 in Feb, below the 53.0 expectations.

Source: Bloomberg

Under the hood, ISM’s survey saw employment fall back into contraction at 48.0.

Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said:

“A further robust expansion of service sector activity in February follows news of faster manufacturing output growth. The goods and services producing sectors are collectively reporting the sharpest growth since last June, hinting at a further quarter of solid GDP growth.

The acceleration occurred despite a cooling of growth in financial services, linked to the recent pull-back in rate cut expectations. Demand for consumer goods and services has, however, picked up further in February amid the easing of the cost of living crisis and healthy labor market conditions, meaning consumers are once again at the forefront of the economic expansion. “

However, it’s not all rainbows and soft-landing unicorns

A concern is that alongside this faster growth, the survey has seen price pressures revive.

Although average prices are still rising at one of the slowest rates seen over the past four years, the rate of inflation picked up for goods and services alike in February to hint at some broad-based firming of price pressures that could worry policymakers about cutting interest rates too early.”

So, to summarize, slower growth in services, mixed manufacturing, and higher prices in both… paging Mr. Powell.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/05/2024 – 10:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/YcnygQT Tyler Durden