Surprise, Surprise!

Surprise, Surprise!

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

“The left’s ideas have failed and failed spectacularly, and all they have left is cheating.”

– Elizabeth Nickson

Of course, there’s no “pandemic” this time to cover for the trip that the Party of Chaos wants to lay on the country, no excuse for gross and glaring ballot fuckery, for the days of anxious uncertainty following an election. Everybody and his uncle expect a gigantic tantrum to follow November 6 if Mr. Trump somehow overcomes the tide of bogus harvested votes, illegal alien votes, phantom overseas votes, voting machine swapped votes, lost-and-found votes, last-minute rafts of votes, and other products of the Marc Elias election sabotage machine.

I am not so sure that the tantrum will materialize. Despite the orgy of Orwellian language inversions you have been subjected to in recent years, and the bending of reality it induced, you will know a real insurrection if you see it. You already know the real reason the Democratic Party went insane: its crime spree against the citizens of this land was so obvious and outrageous that a thousand Beltway bureaucrats are now going crazy in fear of prosecution.

The tantrum everyone expects them to provoke would be a real insurrection and they are liable to find themselves in even deeper trouble for resorting to it.

Crime is the whole reason for the Democrats’ desperation. There was no “policy” the past four years, only crime. The Covid operation was a mass murder. The open border was not something that just happened, like a spell of bad weather. It was a colossal racketeering operation. They worked it hard. “Joe Biden” paid dozens of NGO cut-outs to systematically jam more than ten million sketchy interlopers into the country, and then support them lavishly with cash payments when they got here.

The political prosecutions of AG Merrick Garland are gauche and lawless. The pervasive censorship by DHS and other agencies is an affront to our constitution. The transgender campaign is a malicious prank against American children (and their parents). Our CIA may be a party to the fentanyl crisis. The war in Ukraine is a failed resource-grab, unbelievably stupid in inception. “Joe Biden’s” empty treasury is writing trillions in IOUs to stealthily bail out the banks and jack-up the stock market. Everything about our government has become criminal and those responsible for it know they are bound for a reckoning now.

Will the Democrats’ Antifa street-army be allowed to terrorize the cities? I expect the remaining cops not de-funded in DC, New York, Chicago, and LA won’t hold back this time, no matter what mayors Muriel Bowser, Eric Adams, Brandon Johnson, and Karen Bass tell them to do. You will instead see the return of something that has been missing for years: a sense of duty to public safety and the common good. Won’t that be a surprise? And there will be nothing that the FBI can do about. It’s one thing to incite a riot among a mob of ordinary middle-aged folks moiling around the US Capitol. It’s another thing to try to subvert the police in carrying out their duties. New heroes will emerge and there will be no ambiguity about what happens.

Black Lives Matter had already been outed as a lowlife money-grubbing hustle. But the Democratic Party may no longer depend on its old “plantation” field-hands to stage mostly peaceful anarchy and arson if the election goes the wrong way for the masters. Forty years of pretending to be an oppositional culture hasn’t worked. It was just minstrelsy updated, when all was said and done. Too many black men are rising up to speak out in support of Donald Trump, and of one America, and of acting like men. They appear to be tired of self-stigmatizing as designated victims in the Woke-Jacobin DEI psychodrama.

A new generation of black male leaders is emerging to replace embarrassing con artists like Al Sharpton, Michael Eric Dyson, and Ibram X. Kendi. It’s been a long time coming.

Will we ever know how Kamala Harris was put over on the Democratic Convention like the sale of a used car? How the rank-and-file delegates got swindled into nominating her by acclamation without any debate, without anyone else rising to object, anyone else offering up themselves for a vote? There wasn’t even smoke-filled room this time where the bosses actually haggled over who would front for them, not a minute of suspense, no process whatsoever. Kamala Harris was just pulled out of a hat, like a rabbit. And everybody involved knew she was a dud, a slow learner, inattentive, not well-educated, lazy, possibly high a lot of the time, self-medicating due to anxiety, insecurity, purposelessness.

It took four years for slightly more than half of America to see that our country’s fate was in the hands of villains wrecking the joint. It looks like their depredations are nearly over. The USA really does not want to gurgle down the drain of history. We’re not ready to roll over and die. We’re waking up from an induced coma, starting to remember who we are. That has been the weird lesson of 2024. Surprise, surprise!

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 16:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/IpdBvQ3 Tyler Durden

Bonds & Bitcoin Dump, Dollar & Crude Jump As Leading Economic Index Hits 8 Year Lows

Bonds & Bitcoin Dump, Dollar & Crude Jump As Leading Economic Index Hits 8 Year Lows

The day started off with a slow and gentle selloff in equity futures overnight and then US Leading Economic Indicators  tumbled to their lowest since 2016 (with ironically and reflexively, only stock returns holding the index above some very ugly levels)…

Source: Bloomberg

…but interestingly, STIRs ignored it and shifted more hawkishly (with the market now pricing in just a 50% chance of a second rate-cut this year)…

Source: Bloomberg

Gold and crypto prices surged early on but ended up being dumped. Crude and bond yields moved higher together along with the dollar as prediction markets and polls pull increasingly towards Trump…

Source: Bloomberg

But, Goldman’s Chloe Garber summed up the day well: Sell everything to buy NVDA which is propping up the S&P by 60bps…

Source: Bloomberg

Coming into today, HFs had been buying equities for 6 straight sessions, that streak will end today as our desk is seeing the highest sell skew from HFs since 9/30.

Small Caps were the biggest losers (the most yield sensitive) while Nasdaq desperately clung to unchanged. The Dow lagged the S&P 500…

‘Most Shorted” stocks were monkeyhammered lower on the day…

Source: Bloomberg

Tech and Energy managed to eke out gains on the day while Real Estate stocks were clubbed like a baby seal as rates ripped higher…

Source: Bloomberg

VIX pushed back above 19 intraday…

Source: Bloomberg

Another day, another bloodbath in bond-land (with yields up 7-10bps across the curve). Non-stop selling pressure from the European open…

Source: Bloomberg

2Y yields are back above 4.00%…

Source: Bloomberg

…and 10Y yields back at 3mo highs, perfectly testing its 200DMA…

Source: Bloomberg

The dollar rallied once again to the highest since August 1st…

Source: Bloomberg

Gold surged to a new record high this morning before someone decided to pull the rug…

Source: Bloomberg

Silver continued to outperform Gold today

Source: Bloomberg

WTI rallied back above $70 today, erasing Friday’s losses…

Source: Bloomberg

Bitcoin rallied up to $69,500 before tumbling back to $67,000 today…

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, the event risk ‘lump’ is becoming more and more clear for that first week of Nov…

Source: Bloomberg

But, as Goldman Sachs Brian Garrett notes the implied move for the US presidential election stands at 2%

“This is the lowest reading since we began tracking the excess variance…

I would start to argue this is perhaps getting a little too low.”

Source: Goldman Sachs

There are ten full trading sessions left between now and election day – do you feel lucky?

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 16:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/y3EM19f Tyler Durden

The Silver Squeeze Has Officially Begun

The Silver Squeeze Has Officially Begun

Authored by Jesse Colombo via Substack,

For the past several weeks, I’ve been writing articles and creating video presentations about an imminent silver breakout that could quickly push prices to $50. During this time, I’ve observed significant investor cynicism, as many grew frustrated with silver’s sideways movement over the last five months. In that content, I encouraged investors to remain confident, as I believed silver was on the brink of a historic bull market. Sure enough, on Friday, what began as a typical day saw silver surge nearly 7%, meeting the criteria I had outlined to confirm the next phase of its bull market. In this article, I will break down the details of silver’s Friday breakout and explain why a powerful silver squeeze has now officially begun.

The key criterion I outlined to confirm the next leg of the silver rally was simple yet widely overlooked by investors and surprisingly difficult to achieve: the spot price of silver must decisively close above the $32.50 resistance level, supported by strong trading volume. The $32.50 resistance level was set at the May high, after which silver retreated and stagnated over the summer. Silver made attempts to break through this level on September 26th and October 4th, but both attempts failed, resulting in further pullbacks. Silver’s impressive $2.02 (6.38%) surge on Friday, accompanied by trading volume more than double the prior week’s average, definitively fulfills that criterion. (A caveat to consider is that if silver closes back below the $32.50 resistance level, it would invalidate Friday’s bullish signal. However, I find that scenario unlikely.)

Although Friday’s trading began like any ordinary day, volume surged in the afternoon as it became evident that silver’s breakout above the $32.50 resistance level had staying power. It’s likely that a good portion of this volume came from traders scrambling to cover their short positions—a topic I’ll explore in greater detail later in this article. The heavy trading volume serves as a crucial confirmation of silver’s breakout, signaling that major institutions or ‘smart money’ are getting on board. This significantly reduces the likelihood that this is a false breakout.

The next condition I outlined was that silver priced in euros must decisively close above the €30 resistance level, which was established at the May peak. I stated that this event would help confirm a close above $32.50, greatly reducing the chances of it being a false breakout. I find it valuable to analyze silver priced in euros, as this approach removes the impact of U.S. dollar fluctuations, offering a clearer view of silver’s intrinsic strength or weakness. Notably, silver priced in euros often respects round numbers like €26, €27, and €28, frequently establishing key support and resistance levels at these points. On Friday, silver finally broke through the €30 level with such momentum that it even closed above €31, signaling the strong potential for further gains in the coming week.

The final condition I listed is more esoteric, but I believe it will significantly reduce the likelihood of a silver breakout being a false one: an index I developed, called the Synthetic Silver Price Index, must close above its key resistance zone between 2,560 and 2,640. This index represents the average of gold and copper prices, with copper’s price adjusted by a factor of 540 to prevent gold’s higher price from disproportionately influencing the index (to learn more about this methodology, please watch the recent presentation I created). The price of copper is an often overlooked factor in silver’s performance and rivals the influence of gold. The index closely mirrors silver’s price movements, yet surprisingly, silver’s price itself isn’t even an input!

Although the Synthetic Silver Price Index didn’t break out on Friday, it still posted a solid 1.21% gain. Given the sheer strength of silver’s breakout, I’m choosing to overlook this criterion for now. I expect a breakout in the index is still forthcoming, which will further validate silver’s rally and likely provide additional momentum to its current upward trajectory. The index didn’t break out primarily due to copper’s weakness over the past few weeks. However, with a rebound in copper likely soon (as I’ll explain shortly), this should help the index break out in the near future.

Gold, a major driver of silver prices, is generating a strong tailwind for silver after breaking through two key resistance levels since September. By every measure, gold is in a confirmed uptrend, and I believe it’s on track to reach $3,000 in the near future. This momentum should continue to bolster silver’s rally. While gold reaching $3,000 might a bit far-fetched, it’s actually quite realistic, as it’s just over a 10% increase from today’s price.

The price of copper is often an underappreciated factor in silver’s performance, as I recently explained. Copper’s recent decline has weighed on silver, but there is a strong likelihood that it will find support around the $4.25 level and bounce from there. This rebound should provide an extra boost to silver’s nascent rally.

Silver mining stocks are also important to watch for confirming silver’s price movements, as they often mirror investor sentiment toward the metal. The Global X Silver Miners ETF (symbol: SIL), the most heavily traded silver mining stock ETF, had been stuck in a flat range since April. I’ve been stating that a strong, high-volume close above the $36 to $38 resistance zone would indicate that both silver and silver mining stocks are primed for a major breakout—and that’s exactly what occurred on Friday. I believe that those who were lamenting the poor performance of silver mining stocks will soon be singing a different tune!

Similarly, the Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (symbol: SILJ)—a key proxy for junior silver mining shares—broke above its $13 to $14 resistance zone:

Another key confirmation I’ve been watching for is a breakdown in the gold-to-silver ratio, a useful indicator for assessing silver’s price trajectory. As I stated, a close below the 83 to 84 support zone is valuable for confirming the start of a silver rally and its outperformance over gold—and that’s exactly what happened on Friday:

The long-term gold-to-silver ratio chart reveals that silver is currently significantly undervalued compared to gold, indicating that silver has much more room to rise in order to catch up. If the ratio were to revert to its historical average of 52.8 since 1915, even without any increase in gold’s price, silver would be valued at a respectable $51.55 per ounce.

Adjusting silver’s price for inflation further highlights how undervalued it is by historical standards. During the Hunt brothers-induced spike in 1980, silver reached an inflation-adjusted price of $143.54. In the 2011 bull market, driven by quantitative easing, it hit $68.04. Currently trading at just $33.70, silver has significant room to rise if it’s to catch up with these previous inflation-adjusted peaks.

Another way to assess whether silver is undervalued or overvalued is by comparing it to various money supply measures. The chart below shows the ratio of silver’s price to the U.S. M2 money supply, providing insight into whether silver is keeping pace with, outpacing, or lagging behind money supply growth. If silver’s price significantly outpaces money supply growth, the likelihood of a strong correction increases. Conversely, if silver lags behind money supply growth, it suggests a potential period of strength ahead. Since the mid-2010s, silver has slightly lagged behind M2 growth, which, combined with other factors discussed in this piece, position it for a strong rally.

There is a high probability that silver will quickly run to $50 in the course of this rally. I’m focusing on $50 as a relatively short-term target because it’s a significant psychological level and the peak reached during both the 1980 and 2011 rallies. One of the reasons why I’m so bullish on silver is because its monthly chart reveals a recent breakout from a massive, two-decade-long triangle pattern. This breakout confirms that silver is on the verge of a powerful bull market:

Even more exciting is the fact that silver’s logarithmic chart, dating back to the 1960s, reveals a cup-and-handle pattern, indicating the potential for silver to reach several hundred dollars per ounce during this bull market. In order to confirm this particular scenario, silver needs to close decisively above the $50 resistance level.

Earlier in this article, I mentioned that a significant portion of Friday’s silver buying volume was likely driven by short-covering. Short-covering happens when traders who have bet against an asset, like silver, through short-selling are forced to buy it back as the price rallies, in order to limit their losses. As the asset’s price rises, these traders become increasingly desperate to buy it back to close their positions, which in turn fuels the rally even further. If the buying is aggressive enough, this can lead to a short squeeze, amplifying the upward momentum.

A key condition for a short squeeze is the presence of unusually heavy short positioning in the asset. This is currently the case in COMEX silver futures, where swap dealers—mainly bullion bank trading desks—hold their largest net short position in eight years, totaling 38,832 contracts. This is equivalent to 194.43 million ounces of silver, or roughly 23% of the annual global silver productiona staggering figure.

Many analysts believe that bullion banks like JPMorgan and UBS are engaging in aggressive naked short-selling—dumping silver futures without actually holding the physical silver to back them up—in an effort to manipulate silver prices downward. There is a strong chance that these banks will end up on the wrong side of the trade as this rally continues, triggering a powerful silver short squeeze. Given the current size of their short position, bullion banks face nearly $200 million in losses for every dollar increase in the price of silver. This means they lost nearly $400 million on Friday alone! Now, just imagine what will happen as silver climbs by $5, $10, $20, and beyond from this point.

The risk of an explosive silver short squeeze is further amplified by the astonishing ratio of 408 ounces of “paper” silver—ETFs, futures, and other derivatives—for every single ounce of physical silver. In a violent short squeeze, holders of “paper” silver could be forced to scramble for the extremely scarce physical silver to fulfill their contractual obligations. This would cause the price of “paper” silver products to collapse, while physical silver prices would skyrocket to jaw-dropping levels, potentially reaching several hundred dollars per ounce (this event is what may fulfill the price target implied by the cup and handle pattern I showed earlier).

As if the technical outlook weren’t already bullish enough, silver’s fundamentals are just as compelling. Surging industrial demand, coupled with declining global mine production, has kept silver in a structural deficit for the past four years—and there’s no sign of relief on the horizon. In 2023, the deficit reached 184.3 million ounces, with an even larger shortfall of 215.3 million troy ounces projected for 2024. The silver deficit in recent years has rapidly depleted above-ground supplies, tightening supply even further. This shrinking supply will intensify the impending silver short squeeze, driving an even more dramatic price surge. For a deeper dive into silver’s bullish fundamentals, be sure to check out my article from earlier this year.

Silver’s breakout on Friday marks a pivotal moment in its ongoing bull market, confirming many of the key conditions I’ve been highlighting for weeks. With silver decisively closing above the critical $32.50 resistance level and surging on high volume, the stage is set for a powerful rally. The technical and fundamental drivers behind silver are aligning, from the breakdown in the gold-to-silver ratio to surging demand and shrinking supply. The looming threat of a short squeeze, combined with silver’s structural deficit, suggests that the price could climb significantly higher, potentially reaching levels not seen in decades. As silver continues its upward trajectory, the potential for explosive gains has never been clearer.

*  *  *

The Bubble Bubble Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support Jesse’s work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 15:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/DgexXsk Tyler Durden

Aramco CEO Says China Oil Demand “Bright Spot”  

Aramco CEO Says China Oil Demand “Bright Spot”  

Speaking on the sidelines of the Singapore International Energy Week conference, Saudi Aramco CEO Amin Nasser said he was “fairly bullish” on China’s oil demand, especially after Beijing rolled out a series of stimulus measures to revive the world’s second-largest economy.

“We see more demand for jet fuel and naphtha, especially for liquid-to-chemical projects,” Nasser said on the sidelines, adding, “A lot of it is happening in China mainly because of the growth in chemical needs. Especially for the transition, for the electric vehicles, for the solar panels, they need more chemicals. So that’s huge growth there.”

China, the world’s largest crude oil importer and second-largest oil consumer, is Aramco’s largest crude oil customer. Nasser noted that Aramco plans to increase liquids-to-chemical capacity to 4 million barrels a day, with most of the increase directed at Chinese markets. 

“China is a great market. We are investing with our partners,” he said, adding his firm has increased investments in China. 

He also noted that the demand for aviation fuel has been a “bright spot” in the country.

In markets, Brent crude prices were up nearly 2% to the mid-point of the $74 handle on mounting risks that Israel launches a counterattack on Iran. Last week, prices fell 7% as China’s slowdown dominated themes.

Nasser pointed out that Asia’s energy transition is occurring much slower than initially anticipated. He said that over decades, the Global South will increase oil demand as living standards rise—and this will eventually be followed by a long plateau.

“Most analysts agree that even when the growth in global oil demand stops at some point, no abrupt drop in overall demand is anticipated, and that stage is likely to be followed by a long plateau,” he said, adding, “Rather than an energy transition, we are really talking about energy addition.”

“If so, more than 100 million barrels per day would realistically still be required by 2050,” he said at the conference. 

“This is a stark contrast with those predicting that oil will, or must, fall to just 25 million barrels per day by then. Being short 75 million barrels every day would be devastating for energy security and affordability,” Nasser warned.

He said countries should use a mix of energy sources that push them closer to their climate ambitions, adding, “Our main focus should be on the levers available now.”

In a recent report, the IEA wrote that crude oil demand could slide by the end of the decade because of the “Age of Electricity.”

Despite forecasts of a sharp and sudden plunge in global crude oil demand, that’s not what’s happening. In fact, fossil fuels, particularly natural gas, will continue to power the global economy for decades to come.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 15:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/fEoZ41K Tyler Durden

Time To Overwhelm Them With Thought-Crimes

Time To Overwhelm Them With Thought-Crimes

Authored by Jim Quinn via The Burning Platform blog,

“Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed for ever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you”. – Orwell’s 1984

“They do not even need evidence to condemn someone they believe is guilty”. – Orwell’s 1984

Many people have joked that Orwell’s 1984 wasn’t supposed to be an instruction manual, but now it’s not a joke. Orwell’s cautionary warning about authoritarianism, mass surveillance, and the suppression of free speech through the use of propaganda, censorship, and threat of imprisonment and torture, has come to fruition, especially since the Party’s rollout of the covid plandemic in 2020. Despite virtually every student being required to read 1984 at some point in their schooling, none of Orwell’s strident warnings seem to have been grasped. Therefore, the ruling oligarchy has used virtually every totalitarian tool in the novel to their fullest extent.

I don’t believe anything the government says, reports, instructs me to fear, or demands me to hate. I have felt this way for at least the last two decades. And my mistrust has proven to be entirely warranted, as our freedoms, liberties, and rights have been trampled upon and discarded by our overlords. With the proliferation of social media platforms, which should have vastly expanded our free speech opportunities and free flow of information, we’ve seen a massive effort by “The Party”/Deep State to censor anything that deviates from the approved state narrative and career ending punishment of those willing to contradict the lies, mistruths, and disinformation.

As Ron Paul stated many years ago: “Truth is treason in an empire of lies.” And this empire of debt, destruction, delusion, and decadence is sustained only by lies and false narratives at this pivotal point in history. The bloviating neo-con authoritarian tyrants fall back on the same old tired narrative of the U.S. being the beacon of light in a dark world, when it is the failing American empire spreading death, destruction, and disarray around the globe. Hanging their hat on the most powerful military in the world and having the dominant currency in the world is a losing proposition.

We spent over $2 trillion fighting the Taliban from 2001 until 2022 and were defeated by a bunch of third world goat herders. Most powerful military in the world, my ass. Every military conflict we initiate or sponsor becomes a clusterfuck. The U.S. initiated the Ukraine war in 2014 with the CIA overthrow of the legitimately elected government and we have poured over a hundred billion into this quagmire since provoking Putin to invade. We fund all sides in the Middle East debacle, that threatens to expand into WW3. This doesn’t even count the hundreds of billions wasted in the destruction of Iraq, Libya, and Syria. But at least the military industrial complex extracted enormous profits as the empire crumbled.

The U.S. dollar is no longer king. Its demise is being signaled by the all-time highs in gold and crypto-currencies. Russia, China and their expanding coalition of BRICS countries are rapidly building a new economic paradigm that will further reduce the world’s dependence on the USD. But, these external forces are nothing compared to the death spiral initiated by our own corrupt politicians, central bankers, and government bureaucrat drones.

Your government added $500 billion to the national debt in 3 weeks, and is now adding at a rate exceeding $2 trillion per year, while paying $1.2 trillion per year in interest on the existing national debt of $35.8 trillion. For perspective, at the beginning of this century the national debt was $5.7 trillion, after 211 years as a country, and we were running small surpluses annually. Gold is always a good barometer of how well a country’s finances have been managed. It stood at $275 per ounce on January 1, 2000 and now is up by a factor of 10 at $2,736 today. The financial situation of this country is dire, but everyone continues to pretend everything is normal. It’s not normal and the crash will mark the end of this empire and possible the end of America as a country.

I’ve been committing thoughtcrime every day since I began my blog in 2009. I’ve been punished through demonetization, censorship, career damaging suppression, and the disdain of the majority of sheep in this country as nothing more than a crazy conspiracy theorist. It has been a lonely fifteen year slog, but my will to resist the government and their false narratives has never wavered or waned. My faith in the fact that the existing social order is always swept away during Fourth Turnings, keeps me fighting the good fight, day after day.

I feel the tide beginning to turn, as those in power desperately seek to retain their wealth, power and control. Their condemnations of truth tellers is losing its luster. Less and less people are believing their bullshit. The regime controlled media is now a laughingstock, as they flail about and are caught in their manipulative actions by the thoughtcrime brigade in the alt-media. With the censorship during the covid scamdemic they almost achieved Orwell’s dystopian vision, but they have failed. I know things are going to get far worse over the next several years, but they will not win. Their Newspeak strategy to eliminate our thoughtcrimes has failed. The truth will ultimately prevail.

“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it”. – Orwell’s 1984

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 15:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/RYot8Hm Tyler Durden

Seven Israelis Accused Of Giving Info To Iran On Targeted IDF Bases

Seven Israelis Accused Of Giving Info To Iran On Targeted IDF Bases

In an unexpected and somewhat bizarre new development out of Israel, government authorities say they’ve busted up a significant spy network, arresting seven Israeli citizens for gathering information on behalf of Iranian intelligence.

Israel’s internal security agency Shin Bet announced Monday that it “successfully dismantled a spy network involving seven Israeli citizens who were operating on behalf of Iranian intelligence.”

The detained have been identified as Jewish residents of Haifa and the north, even including an IDF soldier who had deserted the military. They have been named in Israeli press reports as Azis Nisanov, Alexander Sadykov, Vyacheslav Gushchin, Yevgeny Yoffe and Yigal Nissan – with the other two names not disclosed as they have been deemed minors.

Image: IDF/Middle East Eye

Shin Bet has said the group conducted hundreds of small operations on behalf of Tehran, mostly focused on photographing and monitoring sensitive military sites, even the locations of where Iron Dome battery sites are positioned.

They reportedly spied on Kirya defense headquarters in Tel Aviv and the Nevatim and Ramat David air bases, along with other bases of the Israel Defense Forces.

Some of these very sites were targeted by Iran’s Oct.1st ballistic missile attack, or else they have also been targeted by Hezbollah rockets from the north.

The tasks also allegedly involved the exchange of maps with their Iranian handlers, detailing locations of military sites. It is being called one of the “most serious cases” of Iran-related spying in memory.

“In return for their actions, the suspects were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars, some of it in cryptocurrency, investigators say,” Times of Israel writes. The report notes further that “all of them have carried out espionage activities since the start of the war.”

One of the locations that the group of alleged spies are believed to have passed information to the Iranians on is Golani Brigade training base, which just last week was hit by a Hezbollah drone. Four soldiers died and dozens were injured when a kamikaze drone slammed into a crowded mess hall as troops were dining.

In recent years there have been multiple examples of Israeli intelligence operations on Iranian soil, either for assassinations or nuclear sabotage actions, but much more rare is to hear about Iranian intelligence operations conducted inside Israel.

Meanwhile, the US is scrambling to figure out the source of a recent leak of highly classified intelligence documents related to Israel’s preparations to attack Iran…

Just last month there was a prior major alleged spying incident. At that time Israeli police identified 73-year-old Moti Maman from Ashkelon as being an Iranian intelligence asset. He reportedly expressed willingness to conduct an assassination campaign inside Israel at the behest of his Iranian handlers.

An Israeli Jew, Maman was accused of agreeing to receive one million dollars in total from Iranian intelligence if assassinations of some top Israeli officials were carried out. He’s described as having used frequent trips as a businessman in Turkey and in the region as cover.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 14:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/kBE1pfn Tyler Durden

California Continues To See Negative Net Domestic Migration

California Continues To See Negative Net Domestic Migration

Authored by Jane Yang via The Epoch Times,

How many people in the United States are moving to the Golden State and how many are moving to other states? Newly released data from the U.S. Census Bureau for 2023 provides a glimpse into these numbers.

The statistics released Oct. 17 showed that an estimated 422,000 people moved to California from other states and an estimated 690,000 moved to other states in 2023. This resulted in a net negative domestic migration of 268,000.

The top five destination states for Californians were Texas, Arizona, Nevada, Washington, and Florida, with people moving to these states making up around 39 percent of the domestic migration out of California.

The top five states people left behind when moving to California were Texas, New York, Washington, Nevada, and Oregon.

The data also showed that of the other three most populated states in the U.S., New York state also had a net loss in domestic migration, while Florida and Texas both had gains in domestic migration.

In comparison, for the year 2022, census data showed around 475,800 people moved to California from other states, while 817,700 people moved out of state, indicating that domestic migration into and out of the Golden State slowed slightly since the previous year.

In 2021, California saw 433,400 move into the state, while around 841,000 people moved to another state.

Immigration Data

The census bureau data also show that although California lost more people to other states in 2023, it had a higher number of immigrants—an estimated 315,700 people from foreign countries—moving in last year, legally or illegally.

More than a million people moved from abroad into the four states with the highest population in the U.S. in 2023, including California.

In 2022, 303,100 people moved to California from abroad, and 188,700 people moved to the state from other countries in 2021.

California leaders earlier this year pointed to immigration as an important factor in California’s population growth.

The California Department of Finance reported in April, “For the first time since 2020, California has once again experienced positive population growth in 2023,” and one reason was the rebound of “foreign legal immigration.”

California’s population grew by more than 67,000 in 2023 to 39.1 million and the rebound of foreign legal immigration brought California “a net gain of 114,200 persons in 2023 compared to 90,300 in 2022.”

The department cautioned against comparing its numbers to those of the Census Bureau, since they refer to different points in time.

The state Department of Finance also stated, “Net domestic migration no longer offsets the population gains from natural increase and international migration.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 14:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/8kepwj5 Tyler Durden

Goldman: “Keep Pressing” NatGas Shorts Amid Weakest October Demand In 61 Years

Goldman: “Keep Pressing” NatGas Shorts Amid Weakest October Demand In 61 Years

Mild weather across the Lower 48 has capped natural gas demand, keeping futures locked in a bearish sideways trend, unable to breach the $3 per million British thermal units level.

Goldman’s Thomas Evans published a note on Monday about the US NatGas market, pointing out that October’s unusually warm weather in the Lower 48 has led to the third-lowest Heating Degree Days (HDDs) for October since 1963.

“The big picture since the start of last week is that not much has changed except that we’ve rolled one week forward with warmer forecasts for start of November, and price has sold off to keep pace with the HDD shedding. 

… 

We gained some HDDs in overnight runs with a secondary trough digging into the East, but it is still really warm – we’re looking at the third lowest HDDs for October since 1963.  This warmth (in the East) could extend into the first half of November – the long range European models keep the warmer bias:

Looking at forecasts for this winter, Evans expalined to clients:

Nevertheless, as with last week, we could argue that we haven’t really learned anything new for December to March. We still don’t know anything about (proper) winter weather, and we still don’t know anything about winter production – although we seem to be asking producers not to give us more gas until at least December (and we dropped 2 gas rigs last week).

Total Demand should recover through the end of the month:

In NatGas markets, he advised clients on how to trade through December: 

Given how well the bear trend has worked for November, folks may keep pressing shorts into December – if we roll warm this will work, however CTAs look max short here and our metereologists assure us that there’s little statistical follow through from a warm Nov start into Dec (“the warmest November on record (2001) rolled into the 7th warmest December on record. However, the 2nd warmest November (2016) rolled into a colder than 30-year normal December instead – CWG”). Selling December $2.25 puts to own $3.25/$3.75 call spreads doesn’t seem crazy, especially as Z 95-75d call skew looks a little rich:

The January/April spread is now just 2c over where we expired last year, and last year we had a big November flush of production, a warm start to November, and a very warm December.  In fairness the spread was pricing weaker in mid-December ’23 before indications of SSW causing a PV intrusion started to crop up near the end of the month, lending strength to the January into expiry. Nevertheless, it still feels a little early to write off so much deliverability risk premia.

If you do think that winter is over and gas is doomed – or that any pop in weather will get flooded with production, then you’ll be worried about cash pricing next shoulder season. You might just generally worry about cash pricing in the shoulder season given continued solar and battery deployment – if so then the April/Octoberspread might be a better sell than the January/April.  We like it as a box vs the J/V 26 – we’ll need to be calling for Haynesville growth into X5H6, and JV26 might actually be tight, and if April/October25 rallies, you probably get a bit of a sympathy move in April/OctoberV26 to protect you (while being limited to the downside given you’re sat on the other side of November25/March26. Although we’ve done some of the work a little early, these boxes have tended to roll down.  Early blue maps probably hurt the trade, but there are better ways to get long gas in front of it (see above).

A separate but recent note from the Energy Information Administration and the Natural Gas Supply Association forecasted colder winter weather trends for the Lower 48. 

“We assume this winter will be colder than the last winter across much of the country, especially in the Midwest,” the EIA said.

NGSA wrote that November-March will be 7% colder than last year. Based on more frigid temperatures, the group projects around a 14% increase in residential and commercial demand and a 7% increase in industrial demand. 

NatGas futures trading in New York has been range-bound for nearly two years, primarily because of lower demand and abundant NatGas supplies. 

The latest data from Bloomberg shows that the average temperatures for the Lower 48 are sliding down the 30-year trend line. 

Winter is ahead. 

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 14:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/IYegOAN Tyler Durden

The $100 Trillion Global Debt Bomb And Financial Shock Risk

The $100 Trillion Global Debt Bomb And Financial Shock Risk

Authored by Daniel Lacalle,

This week, the IMF stated that “our forecasts point to an unforgiving combination of low growth and high debt, a difficult future,” emphasizing that “governments must work to reduce debt and rebuild buffers for the next shock, which will surely come, and maybe sooner than we expect.”

This advice comes with a warning. At the current rate of spending, the US debt to GDP will reach 198% by 2050 even without expecting a recession. The G-7 public debt to GDP is expected to soar to 188%; the global figure would rise to 122%. Only one country will reduce debt. The IMF expects Germany to reduce its debt from 63.5% to 42%. In the case of Japan, the IMF expects public debt to reach a staggering 329%. The IMF’s Fiscal Monitor informs that public debt levels will reach $100 trillion in 2024, driven by China and the US.

Very rarely do governments follow the IMF’s advice. Governments only listen when the advice is to spend more. However, when it comes to saving and cutting expenditures, governments quickly perceive the IMF as a malicious organization.

The IMF’s 2020 messages bear some responsibility for this fiscal crisis. In its Annual Report 2020, “A Year Like No Other,” they wrote: “Governments around the world have undertaken major fiscal and financial measures to provide lifelines to people and firms. Such rapid expansions in the role of the government, however, create opportunities for corruption, as past crises have shown. This means governments need to control and oversee emergency fiscal and financial measures. The IMF’s advice has been to spend whatever it takes but keep the receipts.” Which part of the IMF’s advice did governments around the world adopt? Yes, the “spend whatever it takes.” And they did. They still do. In fact, many governments have consolidated and increased the extraordinary expenditure programs of 2020, expanding their role in the economy and increasing deficit spending during a period of economic growth.

One of the fastest growing debt burdens is the United States one. Over the next five years, the IMF anticipates an annual increase in public debt to GDP of nearly three percentage points. It is important to note that the IMF does not foresee a crisis or recession, so this will happen in a growth and job-creation environment.

Governments will disregard any of these recommendations. As I said before, governments only listen to the IMF when it recommends increasing public expenditures and blame the organization when it comes to reducing debt.

No interventionist government will reduce spending, particularly when central banks are lowering interest rates. Even worse, many statistical bodies in the eurozone have massively upgraded the GDP of the past, and their policymakers have used this statistical revision to accommodate more spending, more debt, and more taxes.

The IMF explains in its blog entry, “How High Economic Uncertainty May Threaten Global Financial Stability,” that the risks of a financial shock are rising, as complacency about debt meets the risk of a significant slump in economic growth. As usual, the tone of the article is diplomatic and assumes that governments are going to be fiscally prudent and build cushions to avoid a financial shock. Unfortunately, the IMF authors are too optimistic. The pandemic paved the way for record global fiscal irresponsibility. Every government believes that they will solve their problems by increasing taxes to the wealthy and to large corporations, the oldest and most ludicrous excuse in fiscal policy.

If you believe that the wealthy and large corporations are going to pay $100 trillion in higher additional taxes in the next ten years, you have a problem with mathematics and with history.

The idea that central banks will implement aggressive easing measures when things turn ugly is familiar to governments, and they will push the limits of fiscal policy. However, governments seem indifferent to the devastation this policy is causing the middle class.

The $100 trillion fiscal timebomb means lower growth, lower real wages, financial repression, and destruction of the currencies’ purchasing power in the future. Governments will not pay attention to the IMF because they will use the next shock to increase the size of government in the economy even further under the excuse of another “emergency.”

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 13:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/wz6P8gC Tyler Durden

Where Do American Voters Stand On Immigration Policies?

Where Do American Voters Stand On Immigration Policies?

Given the historic influx of migrants in recent years, immigration stands as a central issue in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

For decades, U.S. presidents have proposed broad immigration reform, but each has failed to receive support in Congress. In fact, the last comprehensive immigration bill was passed four decades ago under President Reagan. Comprehensive immigration reform addresses border security, the status of undocumented immigrants, enforcement, and labor demand.

This graphic, via Visual Capitalist’s Dorothy Neufeld, shows how Americans view immigration policies in 2024, based on surveys from the Pew Research Center.

Harris and Trump Supporters are Mostly Divided on Immigration

Below, we show the share of registered U.S. voters that are strongly in favor or somewhat in favor of each immigration policy, based on a survey conducted August 5-11, 2024:

Currently, 88% of Trump supporters agree with mass deportations of unauthorized immigrants compared to just 27% of Harris supporters.

While Trump has vowed to make mass deportations a part of his platform, it could face legal challenges. Among the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in America, nearly 80% have resided in the country for more than 10 years.

Going further, undocumented immigrants have a right to due process, adding further pressure on the backlogged immigration court system.

When it comes to admitting immigrants to address labor shortages, roughly one in two Republicans agree with this policy compared to 89% of Democrats. In 2023, the immigrant population comprised 18.6% of the U.S. labor force, with the highest share in services, transportation, and construction and natural resources industries.

Both parties, however, find common ground on enhancing border security and admitting more high-skilled immigrants. In fact, 88% of all voters support enhancing border security, while 79% of all voters support admitting high-skilled immigrants.

To learn more about this topic from a historical perspective, check out this graphic on net immigration by president over the last three decades.

Tyler Durden
Mon, 10/21/2024 – 13:25

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/NGvDlBM Tyler Durden