Trump Says He Sent Troops To “Turn On The Water” In California

Trump Says He Sent Troops To “Turn On The Water” In California

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

President Trump issued an emergency directive to send active duty troops to California to help battle the fires that are still destroying people’s lives.

“The United States Military just entered the Great State of California and, under Emergency Powers, TURNED ON THE WATER flowing abundantly from the Pacific Northwest, and beyond,” Trump announced on Truth Social.

“The days of putting a Fake Environmental argument, over the PEOPLE, are OVER,” the President asserted, adding “Enjoy the water, California!!!”

The move comes after Trump signed an executive order Friday titled “Emergency Measures to Provide Water Resources in California and Improve Disaster Response in Certain Areas.”

“For weeks, residents of the Los Angeles area have watched raging fires consume their homes, belongings, beloved pets, and childhood memories. Almost immediately, firefighters were unable to fight the blaze due to dry hydrants, empty reservoirs, and inadequate water infrastructure,” the order reads.

It continues, “Today, at least 28 people have lost their lives and thousands more have lost everything else, with some damage estimates calculating hundreds of billions of dollars in damage.”

The order further states “it is in the Nation’s interest to ensure that California has what it needs to prevent and fight these fires and others in the future.”

It adds that “it is the policy of the United States to provide Southern California with necessary water resources, notwithstanding actively harmful State or local policies. And it is the policy of the United States to assist Americans in disaster areas through responsive policies that more effectively empower them to rebuild and regain their livelihoods.”

Meanwhile, the he California Department of Water Resources has denied that the military has yet entered California, noting that “The federal government restarted federal water pumps after they were offline for maintenance for three days. State water supplies in Southern California remain plentiful.”

The development comes after Trump eviscerated the LA mayor to her face last week, demanding that bureaucracy be put aside to help people deal with the disaster.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 10:05

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/OTSfo1y Tyler Durden

Polaris Reports “Alarming” 2025 EPS Outlook As RZR & ATV Demand Slide

Polaris Reports “Alarming” 2025 EPS Outlook As RZR & ATV Demand Slide

Polaris shares fell 6% in premarket trading after the company, known for producing ATVs, UTVs, jet skis, and snowmobiles, surprised investors with guidance for a 65% year-over-year decline in adjusted EPS for 2025, coming in far below expectations. 

Citi analyst James Hardiman told clients earlier that the downward revision was very “alarming,” warning about President Trump’s tariff battle with China could result in additional downward pressure for EPS for the full year. 

While management suggested on their 3Q call that a good starting point for 2025 EPS would be flat with 2024, which was guided to $3.25, at the time, management officially initiated 2025 adjusted EPS guidance at just $1.10,” Hardiman said, adding his team maintained a “Neutral” rating on PII shares. 

Polaris’ Yearly Forecast (courtesy of Bloomberg):

  • Sees adjusted EPS about -65% from 2024’s $3.25; estimate $3.06

  • Sees sales -1% to -4%

However, Polaris reported better-than-expected revenue in the fourth quarter, though sales fell 23% year-over-year to $1.76 billion. High interest rates deterred consumers from purchasing RZRs, Sportsman ATVs, and other offroad vehicles. 

Here’s a snapshot of the fourth quarter: 

  • Sales $1.76 billion, -23% y/y, estimate $1.68 billion (Bloomberg Consensus)

  • Off Road sales $1.44 billion, -25% y/y, estimate $1.36 billion

  • On Road sales $180.8 million, -21% y/y, estimate $209.8 million

  • Marine sales $137.4 million, -4.1% y/y, estimate $118.3 million

  • Adjusted gross profit margin 21.1% vs. 20.8% y/y, estimate 21.3%

  • Cash and cash equivalents $287.8 million, -22% y/y, estimate $397.8 million

  • Adj. EPS 92c, estimate 90c

Covid bump ended in 4Q22

Polaris’s YoY revenue growth is the worst since GFC. 

Bloomberg noted: 

  • For 2025, expects margin headwinds from negative mix, planned reductions in production leading to negative absorption in addition to the restoration of the company’s employee profit- sharing program

  • Primary factors affecting fourth-quarter sales were lower volume due to planned reductions in shipments as we actively managed dealer inventory in a subdued retail environment

Shares are back to Covid crash levels

Bottoming fishing is a dangerous game… 

Several months ago, Polaris CEO Mike Speetzen warned that “consumer confidence and retail demand remained challenging.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 09:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/Q8vc1ZJ Tyler Durden

Since 2018, Over 75,000 Canadians Died Waiting For Health Care

Since 2018, Over 75,000 Canadians Died Waiting For Health Care

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

If you think Canada has such a great nationalized health care system, you need to reconsider.

Death by Delay

SecondStreet reports 15,474 Canadians Died Waiting for Health Care in 2023-24

Today, SecondStreet.org released government data showing an additional 15,474 patients in Canada died in 2023-24 before receiving various surgeries or diagnostic scans. However, that number is incomplete, as several governments provide either partial data, or simply do not track the problem.

SecondStreet.org collected the data by filing Freedom of Information (FOI) requests across Canada. When the data collected is extrapolated across jurisdictions which did not provide data, the number actually nearly doubles, to around 28,077. These figures cover everything from cancer treatment and heart operations to cataract surgery and MRI scans.

“Canadians pay really high taxes and yet our health care system is failing when compared to better-performing universal systems in Europe,” said Harrison Fleming, Legislative and Policy Director at SecondStreet.org. “Thousands of Canadians across the country find themselves on waitlists — in some cases for several years -— with too many tragically dying before ever getting treated, or even diagnosed.”

Key Findings

  • At least 15,474 patients died in Canada while waiting for surgeries or diagnostic scans. This figure does not include Quebec, Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador and most of Manitoba. Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia only provided data on patients who died while waiting for surgeries – not diagnostic scans.

  • If one extrapolates the data provided across provinces and health regions that did not provide data, an estimated 28,077 patients died last year on health care waiting lists.

  • While some response data is vague, SecondStreet.org observed cases where patients died after waiting anywhere from less than a week for treatment to more than 14 years.

  • New data from Ontario Health suggests 378 patients died while waiting for cardiac surgery or a cardiac procedure.

  • Since April 2018, SecondStreet.org has identified a staggering 74,677 cases where Canadians died while waiting for care.

Another 15,000-Plus Euthanized

The National Review comments on Canada’s Socialized Health-Care Culture of Death

What a debacle. More than 15,000 people died in Canada in one year because they couldn’t access care in the country’s collapsing socialized health-care system.

But it gets worse. About the same number of people were euthanized in Canada in 2023. Some asked to be lethally jabbed because they couldn’t access health care in a timely fashion.

Free Stuff is Grand

Here are some comments to the National Review Article

  • Adjusting proportionally for population, that would be 239,104 deaths in the United States and would make “Unavailability of health care” the third leading cause of death in the US, after heart disease and cancer but ahead of such massive killers as accidents, COVID, and diabetes.

  • If the US adopted Canada’s approach to health care, where would Canadians go for their time-critical and technically advanced medical care? Living in the Great Satan’s shadow has its benefits!

I arrived at a similar 234,488 waiting deaths in the US if the results were similar.

Free stuff is grand, if you don’t die waiting for it.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 07:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/fxiaYT9 Tyler Durden

Trump Says Microsoft In Talks To Purchase TikTok

Trump Says Microsoft In Talks To Purchase TikTok

Late Monday night aboard Air Force One, President Donald Trump told reporters that Microsoft is in discussions with the China-based tech giant ByteDance to acquire TikTok, according to a report from Bloomberg.

“I would say yes,” Trump told reporters when asked if Microsoft would purchase the short video app used by more than 170 million Americans. 

The president continued, “A lot of interest in TikTok. There’s great interest in TikTok.”

Such a deal with Chinese owner ByteDance would avert a ban in the US. On Trump’s first day in office, he signed an executive order extending the divest-or-ban deadline by 75 days. This extension gives ByteDance sufficient time to negotiate a deal with a US company. 

Last week, Trump told reporters he was open to X’s Elon Musk or Oracle founder Larry Ellison purchasing TikTok. 

In recent days, AI startup Perplexity proposed a merger plan with TikTok, with the US government receiving half of the new company, a source told Reuters

Earlier Monday, Trump told House Republican leaders at the Trump National Doral just outside Miami that he previously pushed for a ban of the video app under national security grounds; however, he changed his mind due to pro-Trump content creators that flourished on the platform.

We’ll see what happens. We’re going to have a lot of people bidding on it, and if we can save all that voice and all the jobs, and China won’t be involved, we don’t want China involved, but we’ll see what happens,” he told lawmakers, referring to TikTok. 

Trump noted, “I like bidding wars because you make your best deal. So if there’s a bidding war, that’s a good thing.” 

And Microsoft confirmed. 

Shares of MSFT are muted in premarket trading in New York following the overnight report, as the DeepSeek AI fallout continues to overshadow the entire AI complex. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 07:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/khFrX1f Tyler Durden

Will Trump’s Coal Comments To Davos ‘Greenies’ Revive US Miners?

Will Trump’s Coal Comments To Davos ‘Greenies’ Revive US Miners?

President Donald Trump declared a national energy emergency to boost fossil fuel power generation amid surging load demands on the grid via the ‘Powering Up America‘ theme, including AI data centers, electrification of the economy, and re-shoring trends. The move by Trump underscores a massive policy shift from the Biden-Harris regime’s ‘green’ policies that only acted as a ‘throttle’ on the economy, making US companies less competitive globally. Meanwhile, China ramped up cheap energy via an explosion in coal-fired power production.

“They can fuel it with anything they want, and they may have coal as a backup — good, clean coal,” Trump said in a virtual appearance at Thursday’s annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. 

Trump said that if critical infrastructure, such as natural gas and oil pipelines, gets “blown up,” coal could be used as a critical backup energy source

He noted, “We have more coal than anybody,” adding, “We have more oil and gas than anybody.”

Trump is correct.

The US is the world’s largest producer of oil and NatGas. Although it holds the largest coal reserves globally, it ranks fourth-largest coal producer, behind China, India, and Indonesia.

With Trump pausing the war on fossil fuels, the urgent need to ramp up power production through NatGas and coal will likely become a reality. This move aims to ensure a more stable transition to a clean energy future, including nuclear, while hopefully lowering energy bills for Americans after Biden-Harris’ reckless green policies drove power prices sky-high. 

Trump’s comments on coal sent shares of Peabody Energy, the top US coal miner, surging as much as 7.6% last Thursday—the largest intraday gain since right after the November presidential election.

Will Trump’s comments produce a price floor in the low $18 handle, similar to the price action in 2023? 

Meanwhile, the Russell 3000 Coal Subsector Index climbed 4.2%.

“Trump’s support for fossil fuels is well known, but coal didn’t receive as much attention during this campaign as it did in prior elections,” Bloomberg’s Will Wade pointed out in a note. 

Meanwhile, Bloomberg Javier Blas doesn’t believe in coal’s revival: “Respectfully, I disagree. In the US we know that ultra cheap shale gas has eviscerated the economics of coal-fired power plants. In America, the biggest enemy of coal is gas.” 

With a quarter of US coal power plants set for retirement by 2040, the question arises whether Trump’s push for stable and low-cost fossil fuel power generation will include a revival of coal. Ensuring cheap power for the transition to clean nuclear power is critical for the US and maintaining competitiveness with China in global markets.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 06:55

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ryjVveo Tyler Durden

Zombie Foundations Threaten The Nation And All Of Creation

Zombie Foundations Threaten The Nation And All Of Creation

Authored by Michael Kochin via American Greatness,

As the tide of totalitarian wokeness recedes from the swamp, some of its ugliest and most toxic creatures will find refuge as employees or grantees of tax-exempt nonprofits. In our pluralist and democratic society, we must, to some degree, tolerate organizations with intolerant, inhuman, or wicked purposes, not least because we should have the intellectual humility not to judge every cause on our present knowledge. Who knows what valuable chemotherapy will come from the poison mushroom the Sierra Club is fighting to save?

True, we need, or at any rate must suffer, the plague of foundations—for fear of an unhealthy political monoculture in which our own miscues and misdeeds go unchallenged. That does not mean these foundations’ current powers and privileges should go unscrutinized. The Ford Foundation was set up in 1936 and now controls about $17 billion in assets, and long since passed out of the effective control of the Ford family. The Rockefeller Foundation controls a mere $6 billion but is so alienated from its roots in Standard Oil money that it is divesting from fossil fuels.

These foundations, and the endowed nonprofit sector more broadly, have been captured by a set of woke officers largely unsupervised by equally woke boards of trustees. They are globalist and frequently antihuman, but they benefit from tax privileges at the expense of the American people. The Ford Foundation has given hundreds of millions to Black Lives Matter and similar causes, and nothing to those whose homes and businesses were destroyed by BLM rioters. The Rockefeller Brothers Foundation pays anti-Semitic protestors on Ivy League campuses while claiming to be balanced because it funds the no less murderously intentioned astroturf organization, the Orwellian-monikered Jewish Voices for Peace.

We can’t and we shouldn’t make every rich man in America either blow his stash on drawing to inside straights and launching fast rockets or donate it to more humane causes. But we can require that all nontaxable foundations come to subserve the views of current donors, by requiring every entity in the nonprofit sector to spend down its endowment in a short period of time. At the moment, private foundations are required to spend 5% of their endowment a year. Given market performance, especially in inflationary times, that is far from sufficient to ensure that these foundations do not outlive the intentions of their donors and eat American civilization.

The Federal government should set a spending level sufficient to ensure that all nonprofits are disendowed in a reasonable amount of time. If a 20% required annual payout is not sufficient, we can try 25% or even 50%. If a foundation can’t find a way to spend that money within its alleged lawful purposes, no worries: it can just write a check to the IRS for the difference between what it managed to spend and the required payout. Our national debt is so large that Uncle Sam could swallow all the $1 trillion dollars or more assets of all the private foundations in America with barely a burp.

If the Feds want to be really cynical, the IRS can police the payouts to detect shifting of endowments through shell foundations while ignoring the looting of endowments by foundation executives. No great harm will come to the world from nonprofit vice presidents flying off to Tahiti in private jets with bags of loot and nostrils coated in white powder—we cannot say the same for the money these foundations have lawfully and conscientiously spent on the agendas they hold in good faith.

The Ford Foundation claims to have faith and fidelity to the American nation and pride in the broader American story and to serve, rather than subvert American democratic capitalism. Given its role in funding and promoting the hateful and mendacious 1619 Project, which sought to undermine our faith in America by teaching that Black slavery was the essential pillar of the American project, it is time to put that claim to the destructive test by watching it spend itself down to nonexistence.

The bloated nonprofit sector feeds off American wealth and abuses fundamental freedoms to undermine both liberty and prosperity. Time for some political chemotherapy…

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 06:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/BdkFSg7 Tyler Durden

Trump Effect: NATO Chief Pleads For Members To Quickly Step Up Defense Spending

Trump Effect: NATO Chief Pleads For Members To Quickly Step Up Defense Spending

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday spoke in Lisbon, Portugal alongside the country’s Prime Minister Luis Montenegro. The Portuguese prime minister pledge that his country will meet its 2% goal by 2029, but Rutte emphasized this “will not be enough”

Of course, Rutte primarily had Russia in mind when he spoke the following: “We know that the goal of 2%, now set a decade ago, will not be enough to meet the challenges of tomorrow.”

“To keep NATO strong, we must, however, continue to adapt and to guarantee our security in the future, we also need to ramp up our efforts now. That also means we need to spend more on our defense,” he added.

Donald Trump with Mark Rutte, via AP

It has been confirmed that Portugal, a founding member of NATO, only spent 1.5% of its GDP on its NATO commitments in 2023.

White Rutte has been sounding a similar theme and warning since replacing Stoltenberg last year, these calls to go well beyond 2% spending will only amplify now that Trump is in office in the US, and is a reflection of Trump’s own longtime insistence on much higher spending, at a bar of 5%.

The Trump effect has already borne fruit:

Lithuania and Estonia have become the first NATO members to pledge an increase in defense spending to five percent of GDP, according to a report by the Financial Times.

Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kestutis Budrys and Estonian Prime Minister Kristan Michal confirmed their countries’ commitment to strengthening defense capabilities in response to regional security concerns, the report said.

Newsweek and other publications have specifically cited pressure from Trump as well as preparation for his policies as the driving factor that made this happen.

Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kestutis Budrys acknowledged, “Of course, there’s pressure… from our main and biggest ally in NATO. We cannot ignore those messages.”

But Trump’s high bar of the 5% target is going to be a tall order for most NATO allies, so they can certainly expect to keep feeling the pressure over the next four years.

As we detailed previously, Trump recently proposed a more ambitious 5 percent goal, saying during a Jan. 7 press conference at Mar-a-Lago that “they can all afford it.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 05:45

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/EBxbid6 Tyler Durden

Green Deception: Environmental Activists Serve China’s Energy Agenda

Green Deception: Environmental Activists Serve China’s Energy Agenda

Authored by Joe Buccino via RealClearDefense,

American energy independence is under attack from a shadowy alliance that threatens the foundation of our national security and economic prosperity. On the surface, we see radical environmental activists interrupting corporate shareholder meetings, blocking traffic, and vandalizing artwork. But behind these increasingly aggressive protests lies a more insidious threat: the Chinese Communist Party, which quietly bankrolls these same activists through a complex web of foundations and activist networks. Through dark money, China exploits environmental activism to undermine America’s energy sector. This dangerous partnership between foreign adversaries and domestic extremists demands immediate Congressional action – including comprehensive investigations into Chinese funding of domestic American nonprofits and new laws protecting American energy infrastructure. The security of America’s energy future hangs in the balance, and we can no longer afford to ignore this coordinated assault on our nation’s vital interests.

The evidence of Beijing’s strategic manipulation of American environmental groups has been mounting for years, but recent investigations have exposed the actual depth of these connections. Through a sophisticated network of foundations, consulting firms, and environmental organizations, the Chinese Communist Party has established multiple channels to funnel money and influence into groups working to obstruct American energy development. Beijing’s influence becomes clear when following the money. For example, Climate Defiance is one of the most aggressive new environmental groups making headlines nationwide. More than half of their 2023 funding flowed through the Oil and Gas Action Network – an organization supported by the Energy Foundation, whose Chinese office maintains deep ties to the Chinese Communist nation and Chinese nationals with direct links to the regime. Similarly, investigations reveal several other prominent environmental groups receive substantial funding through organizations with documented connections to Beijing, including research institutes that coordinate with Chinese state entities and foundations that partner with CCP-controlled ecological agencies.

China’s financial support of American environmental groups raises a crucial question that cuts to the heart of Beijing’s strategy: Why would the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter and most prominent financier of fossil fuel projects globally invest in funding American environmental protesters? The answer reveals a calculated effort to weaken American energy independence: these radical groups are unknowingly doing China’s dirty work by targeting and disrupting America’s vital energy infrastructure projects.

The numbers tell the story of China’s true environmental priorities. China’s greenhouse gas emissions are double those of the United States, while Chinese institutions lead the world in financing new fossil fuel developments. These facts expose an obvious truth—China’s interest isn’t in saving the environment but in sabotaging America’s energy independence and economic competitiveness.

The tactical playbook of these Chinese-backed environmental groups has become increasingly aggressive and disruptive. Environmental activists have shut down a New York Times climate conference, declaring that “climate criminals should not be allowed in polite society.” They’ve disrupted major sporting events, vandalized priceless artworks, blocked highways during rush hour, and damaged construction equipment to cause massive delays at pipeline sites.

These aren’t random acts of civil disobedience – they’re part of a coordinated strategy to weaken American energy infrastructure and drive-up consumer costs. The groups behind these actions openly admit their radical aims. The Climate Emergency Fund’s executive director recently told The New Republic that movements “need to have a radical flank that is disrupting normalcy.”

Even when these protests fail to stop energy projects completely, they succeed in driving up costs and causing delays that benefit America’s competitors. Look at what happened in North Dakota, where Greenpeace-organized protests against the Dakota Access pipeline resulted in such extensive damages that the energy company is now suing for $300 million in losses.

These protests achieve China’s goal: making American energy development so costly and complicated that we become increasingly dependent on foreign sources. While American companies battle protesters and legal challenges, China continues to expand its fossil fuel infrastructure at a breakneck pace.

The evidence suggests we’re watching a sophisticated influence operation: China provides funding to U.S.-based foundations, which then channel money to radical environmental groups, who in turn deploy increasingly aggressive tactics against American energy infrastructure. Meanwhile, China races ahead with its own energy development, free from similar protests or disruptions.

The Trump administration should spur Congress to act swiftly to counter this threat. The Select Committee on the CCP must launch comprehensive investigations into the flow of Chinese money to American environmental groups. Americans deserve to know which protesters are funded by foreign adversaries. Second, Congress must pass the Safe and Secure Transportation of American Energy Act, strengthening criminal penalties for individuals who vandalize or disrupt American pipeline operations. This legislation will convey that the Trump administration will not tolerate foreign-funded attacks on critical U.S. infrastructure.

The First Amendment protects Americans’ right to protest and voice dissent. But when foreign adversaries exploit these freedoms to advance their own strategic interests at America’s expense, we must draw a line. The Chinese Communist Party has found willing – though perhaps unwitting – allies in the radical environmental movement. Their partnership threatens not just American energy independence but our national security.

As these groups escalate their disruptive tactics in the months ahead, remember who benefits from their actions.

When protesters shut down American energy projects and drive-up costs for American families, they’re not just advancing an environmental agenda – they’re advancing China’s strategic objectives at America’s expense. The choice before us is clear: We can allow foreign-funded extremists to sabotage American energy independence, or we can take decisive action to protect our critical infrastructure and ensure America’s energy future remains in American hands.

Joe Buccino is a retired U.S. Army Colonel and the CEO of Vantage + Vox.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 05:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ShgZmI9 Tyler Durden

Nissan Planning To Cut Up To 2,000 U.S. Jobs And Reduce Production By 25%

Nissan Planning To Cut Up To 2,000 U.S. Jobs And Reduce Production By 25%

Nissan plans to cut 1,500–2,000 U.S. jobs and reduce production by 25% as part of a strategic review, according to GuruFocus.

It aims to close a production line at its Smyrna, TN plant by April and another at its Canton, MS plant later in the year. The company is reviewing its EV production and investment strategy.

Spokesperson Shiro Nagai stated the reports are unofficial, and Nissan declined further comment. However, it wouldn’t be an unreasonable move for the automaker which has struggled in recent years and is in the midst of considering a merger.

Recall back in late December we wrote that the struggling automaker was considering a tie-up with Honda that would make it the world’s third largest automaker. 

Facing competition from EV leaders like Tesla and China’s BYD, Japanese automakers are uniting to cut costs and accelerate their transition to electric vehicles.

Honda’s president, Toshihiro Mibe, stated last month that the companies plan to form a joint holding company, maintaining their brands while Honda leads management. A merger agreement is targeted for June, with the holding company expected to list on the Tokyo Stock Exchange by August 2026.

There is still to study and discuss, Mibe said. He commented: “Frankly speaking, the possibility of this not being implemented is not zero.”

“We have come to the realization that in order for both parties to be leaders in this mobility transformation, it is necessary to make a more bold change than a collaboration in specific areas,” he added. 

AP writes that a potential merger between Honda, Nissan, and Mitsubishi could create an automotive giant valued at over $50 billion, helping them compete with industry leaders like Toyota and Volkswagen.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 04:15

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/3L1UY6O Tyler Durden

Trump’s 90-Day Suspension Of Foreign Aid Might Counterintuitively Bolster Washington’s Influence

Trump’s 90-Day Suspension Of Foreign Aid Might Counterintuitively Bolster Washington’s Influence

Authored by Andrew Korybko via substack,

One of the Executive Orders that Trump just signed suspends some foreign aid for 90 days, specifically “development assistance funds to foreign countries and implementing non-governmental organizations, international organizations, and contractors”, in order to assess their “efficiencies and consistency with US foreign policy”. It remains unclear at the time of writing whether the State Department’s subsequent “stop-work orders” will affect military aid to Ukraine so that possibility won’t be covered in this analysis.

Most foreign aid programs have been exploited to meddle in other countries’ affairs by funding anti-government and even in some cases anti-state movements that later orchestrate Color Revolutions. Even if they’re not taken to that extreme, they at the very least create problems for the implementation of those countries’ domestic and foreign policies by artificially manufacturing grassroots opposition to them, which manipulates perceptions of their popularity and can thus influence national elections.

Such was recently the case in Georgia, which fended off a nearly-two-year-long Western-backed but superficially “NGO”-driven campaign against the ruling party. This was officially waged in response to their FARA-inspired foreign agents law but was really punishment for them pragmatically refusing to sanction Russia and open up a “second front” against it in the South Caucasus during Ukraine’s failed summer 2023 counteroffensive. Georgia can now rest a bit easier for the time being.

The same goes for the many African countries like new BRICS partner Uganda who’ve been aggressively pressured by American-backed “NGOs” into accepting the normalization of LGBT+ in contravention of their traditional values. As put forth in Trump’s Executive Order, “The United States foreign aid industry and bureaucracy…serve to destabilize world peace by promoting ideas in foreign countries that are directly inverse to harmonious and stable relations internal to and among countries.”

Observers also shouldn’t forget about India after the US meddled in last year’s elections despite their strategic partnership. Russia gave voice to India’s concerns at the time due to the sensitivity of India calling the US out while the political process was ongoing, after which the ruling BJP accused the State Department and the “deep state” of meddling in other matters last month. While independently financed Soros still remains a problem, the US government shouldn’t be one for now, to India’s relief.

Less political meddling and socio-cultural engineering, at least for the next three months, will be much appreciated by all those countries that have been targeted by “NGO”-driven Hybrid War.

The emphasis is on less of these efforts as opposed to their complete freeze since some programs might have enough funds left to partially operate during the interim while the Secretary of State can issue waivers for specific ones at his discretion. Some might therefore continue in full but most will be adversely affected.

The end effect is that American influence might rebound in the Global South since a large part of why many of these countries started turning away from the US since the start of the century was due to it violating their sovereignty by funding “NGOs” that meddle in their affairs.

If Trump reforms the US’ international lending strategy to remove political strings on aid programs, including from those institutions that it controls like the IMF and World Bank, then this process would further accelerate.

His promised imposition of more tariffs might trouble some of these same countries, but it’s not the same as coercing them into making political and socio-cultural changes against their will in exchange for emergency financial aid, which ultimately risks destabilizing them and later advancing regime change. This potentially new approach could restore some of the attractiveness in partnering with the US by partially evening the odds vis-à-vis its competitions with China and Russia in the Global South.

In the event that this comes to pass, then those two would be compelled to offer better deals to their partners in order to prevent them from being enticed by the US into accepting whatever it proposes, thus possibly catalyzing a cycle of competition that works to those other countries’ benefit. For that to happen, the US would have to treat its partners more as equals and less as vassals, but old habits die hard so this can’t be taken for granted even if Trump appears somewhat (key qualifier) interested in it.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 01/28/2025 – 03:30

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/U57PaVX Tyler Durden