Today the Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency. Chief Justice Roberts wrote the opinion for the Court, rejecting claims that the case was non-justiciable and concluding that the EPA lacks broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act. Relying upon the “major questions” doctrine, the Chief Justice explained that Section 111 of the Clean Air Act does not allow the EPA to require generation shifting (i.e. the replacement of coal with renewable energy) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The Chief Justice’s opinion for the Court was joined by the Court’s conservatives. Justice Gorsuch has a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Alito. Justice Kagan writes the dissent on behalf of herself and the other liberal justices. Of note, Justice Kagan concedes the Court had jurisdiction to decide the case (though she makes clear she wishes the Court had not).
For quick background, my prior posts on the WVA case are indexed here.
. . . .updating . . .
The post Supreme Court Rejects Broad EPA Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gases from Power Plants (Developing) appeared first on Reason.com.
from Latest https://ift.tt/PwMIoHe
via IFTTT