WSJ Sounds The Alarm: “There’s No Getting Over” Gas At $4 A Gallon

Consumers, who are already being squeezed by rising interest rates (even as the return on their cash deposits remains anchored near zero), are facing another potential constraint on their already limited purchasing power. And that constraint is  rising gasoline prices, which, as we pointed out last month, could erode the stimulative impact of President Trump’s tax plan as rising prices sop up what little money the middle class is saving.

As prices rise and banks scramble to update their forecasts, the Wall Street Journal has become the latest publication to sound the alarm over what is, in our view, one of the biggest threats facing the US economy in the ninth year of its post-crisis expansion. 

In its story warning about $3 a gallon oil (of course, we’re already seeing $4 a gallon in parts of California and other high-tax states), WSJ cited Morgan Stanley’s latest projection that rising gas prices could wipe out about a third of the annual take-home pay generated by the tax cuts.

Rising fuel costs can also feed inflation and pressure interest rates. Even though the Federal Reserve typically looks past volatile energy prices in the short term, higher energy costs help shape consumer confidence. And with the central bank poised to be more active this year, rising energy costs pose an additional risk to the economy.

Morgan Stanley estimates that if gas averages $2.96 this year, it would take an annualized $38 billion from spending elsewhere, an upward revision from the bank’s $20 billion estimate in January. That would wipe out about a third of the additional take-home pay coming from tax cuts this year, the analysts said.

Patrick DeHaan, petroleum analyst at GasBuddy”Three dollars is like a small fence. You can get through it, you can get over it,” said Patrick DeHaan, petroleum analyst at GasBuddy, a fuel-tracking app. “But $4 is like the electric fence in Jurassic Park. There’s no getting over that.”

Of course, MS’s take appears downright pollyannaish when compared with a Brookings Center report that we highlighted last month.

The left-of-center think tank, which of course has every reason to hope that the next recession will materialize on President Trump’s watch, projected that consumers would soon spend about half of the money saved from tax cuts on fuel costs.

And in a report published in April, Deutsche Bank illustrated how rising fuel costs will disproportionately squeeze the most vulnerable among us – a cohort of consumers who already shoulder an outsize share of the country’s household debt.

DB

The FT put it another way…

FT

As the chart above shows, middle-income families – aka the engine of consumption – will be the hardest hit by rising gas prices.

Indeed, small business owners in California, where gas prices are the fifth highest in the nation thanks to taxes and stringent emissions standards, say they’ve seen their energy bills shoot higher in the past few months. Car salesmen say consumers are asking more questions about mileage, according to WSJ.

Robert Lozano, a car salesman in Los Angeles where some gas prices are already above $4, said the dealership’s gas bill has climbed from about $9,000 to about $12,000 a month recently.

Customers are inquiring more about electric vehicles, he said.

“It’s more in the consumer’s mind as to what the most efficient vehicle is.”

With oil already at $70 a barrel, early indicators imply that the summer driving season could see an unusually large spike in demand for gas…

Vacations

…As the number of Americans intending to take vacations in the next six months climbs to its highest level in decades.

Heightened vacation intentions suggest the number of vehicle miles driven will also climb (because people tend to travel greater distances when they go on vacation). As the chart below shows, fluctuations in miles driven – a close proxy for gas demand – are quickly reflected in prices at the pump.

Gas

While the US’s increasing prominence in the oil-export market could soften some of the economic blow as the energy business booms, other large business from airlines to shipping companies would feel the pinch at a time when costs are already rising.

But some economists say the growing importance of energy to the U.S. economy could blunt some of the impact from rising oil prices.

The country has become a more prominent supplier of crude oil and fuel. Domestic production has reached record weekly levels of 10.7 million barrels per day and a lot of it is being exported.

[…]

“People don’t understand how we could double crude oil production” and see higher gas prices, said Tom Kloza, global head of energy analysis at the Oil Price Information Service. “The answer lies in the balance of payment. We are an exporting power right now.”

[…]

Airlines and shipping companies will also be paying more for jet fuel and diesel – costs that may be passed along to consumers. Even companies such as Whirlpool Corp. have noted that higher oil prices have boosted the cost of materials.

Refiner Valero Energy Corp. said it wouldn’t expect consumer demand to drop off until oil prices are at $80 to $100.

But demand is only one factor driving up oil prices. Supply issues have also weighed on oil traders’ minds. Traders pushed oil prices higher as the US pulled out of the Iran deal as some worried that it could impact global supplies (though, as we’ve pointed out, there are plenty of other buyers waiting to step in and buy Iranian crude). Even if the Iranian crude trade isn’t impacted by sanctions, plummeting production capacity in Venezuela could ultimately have a bigger impact on global supply.

Conflicts in other oil producing regions could also impact supplies, pushing prices higher.

Last week, Bank of America became the first Wall Street bank to call $100/bbl for Brent crude (at the time, it was trading around $77/bbl) in 2019. That could send prices to highs not seen since 2008. Other banks have been scrambling to raise their forecasts as well. 

With the Fed changing its language in its latest policy statement to reflect rising inflation expectations, rising oil prices could also inspire the Fed to hike interest rates more quickly for fear that the economy might overheat. That could result in four – or perhaps five – rate hikes this year.

The resulting effect would be like economic kudzu strangling the buying power of consumers and possibly forcing a long-overdue debt reckoning as millennials, who are already drowning in debt, are forced to put off home ownership and family formation until they’re in their late 30s or even their 40s.

 

 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2IH9z5m Tyler Durden

For The 4th Month In A Row, “Long FAANG” Is The Most Crowded Trade

In the biggest quarterly shocker out of the Harvard Endowment, which one year ago surprised Wall Street when it revealed that its biggest investment was junk bonds, yesterday we showed that the investing fund representing the world’s most prestigious university had concluded there was no better investment than FAANG stocks, or specifically Apple, Microsoft and Google, as just these three stocks representing 72% of Harvard’s long equity portfolio.

So if the smartest guys in the room have decided that the best place to park their cash is a trio of the world’s three most valuable, and expensive, “growth” stocks, what is left for the rest of Wall Street? Clearly not much, because according to the latest monthly Fund Manager Survey conducted by BofA which polls a total of 223 panellists with $643BN in  AUM, for the 4th consecutive month the #1 “most crowded trade” is long FAANG+BAT (for 29% of respondents)…

… with #2 short Treasuries (17%), #3 short the USD (17%), followed by long corporate bonds and #long EM assets. The last one will be especially painful today.

So with all of Wall Street knowing that all of Wall Street is long the same trade – carrying with it the risk of a sharp, sudden unwind should conditions change – what is it that is keeping Wall Street in said trade? The answer is simple: the confidence that central banks will step in and bail traders out. Which is also why the top “tail risk” in May is a hawkish policy mistake by the Fed or ECB, replacing “trade war” as the top fear of the prior 2 months, and “reverting’ to the fears from late 2017.

But while fears of central banks killing the party are back to the forefront, the risk that Trump could say a word out of place remains, as Trade War is close behind in #2 spot with a new participants emerging in spot #3: “Geopolitics cause $100 Oil.

In light of this extreme positioning – and fears – what is the best contrarian trade according to BofA? Short banks and long utilities, driven by lower bond yields.

More on the latest fund manager shortly, in a detailed follow up.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2k1Hqb3 Tyler Durden

Trader: “Emerging Markets Aren’t Heavy… They’re Setting Up To Implode”

Despite yesterday’s slow drift lower off the early gains, The Dow’s 8th win a row and the “best May since 2005” was heralded as proof that all the world’s problems are behind us and it’s plain-sailing from here to new record highs.

However, as former FX trader and fund manager Richard Breslow warned “I keep visualizing oblivious fun-seekers in danger of getting way out over their skis.”

And judging by today’s price action – they were…

Stocks down, gold down, bonds down, the dollar is spiking along with VIX…

But, as Bloomberg reports, there are a lot more problems looming…

Emerging markets aren’t heavy, they’re setting up to implode…

Ten-year Treasury yields aren’t struggling with what to do around this distracting 3% level. They’ve broken back above the, this time, really “psychologically” critical barrier and are coiling for a now inevitable move higher. Do not pass go, do not collect your coupon payment.

The dollar is no longer trying to hold on to recent gains, it’s going to run everything else over. And equities are preparing for a renewed bout of illness from geopolitical risk and trade wars. The price action notwithstanding.

All or none of this could come to pass. But it is a collection of trades du jour that one needs to make sure can hang together. And whether their purveyors will be willing to stick with them, even without instant gratification, remains to be seen. It isn’t the green or red on your screens that should inform your mood. It’s actually meant to work the other way around.

The first thing I’d ask is how much is positions versus view. Both matter, but the former has taken on a significance that can have a lasting, even if not ultimately dispositive, effect on asset prices. Washouts used to take hours or maybe days to be cleared. Now they can last weeks. Or seconds. Made all the worse by the enormous and often blind accumulation of yield grabs.

How many “investors” in Turkish lira or Argentine pesos really had any business carrying this risk? Is today’s caning of the lira from President Erdogan’s latest, and not groundbreaking, comments or because the much rumored “surprise” rate hike wasn’t forthcoming? This is not meant to argue Turkey isn’t in an economic mess. But you can’t actually make an informed decision without knowing the back story.

Contagion across the asset class can have as much to do with portfolio damage control as any real causal relationship. I shudder when I think of all the inquiries about getting into frontier markets. Last week we were still being told that emerging market economies are in great shape to withstand higher global rates. Not true, but never mind. Today, there is “underlying vulnerability” galore.

But why just pick on EM? European government bonds have spent the last two days behaving exactly the same way. So many people relying on Super Mario to buy their inventory. And then along came Francois Villeroy. And yet, peripheral spreads remain bid.

In equities, that asset we all love to hate, a big leap is being made from a risk-off sentiment to the fact that they trade pretty well. Aren’t they supposed to do something bad before being sent to the penalty box? Frankly, I’d rather sell the S&P 500 on a break below 2700 than here. Especially, because the canaries are getting a bit long in the tooth. I’ll tell you what: watch the Shanghai Composite against resistance at 3200 if you want an early warning sign.

As for the dollar, just remember that we’re back to square one on the year. It neither went to zero nor has it flown. Look at it right now and forget what happened during a very trying first part of the year. It too could be back here from stale positions that no longer were working.

Maybe we’re getting closer to a point where not everyone will have the same positions and we can get back to having fun.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2jWIJIs Tyler Durden

World Health Organization Declares Global War on Trans Fats: Reason Roundup

Haven’t we heard this one before? Regularly demonized by the press and politicians just a few years ago, trans fats haven’t been getting much attention lately. But if you thought this debate was done, surprise! It’s really just getting started.

On Monday, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced a plan to eliminate industrially produced trans-fatty acids from the global food supply within five years. Because the WHO has no power of its own to accomplish this, it’s pressuring governments around the world to enact trans-fat bans.

The WHO trans-fats campaign is a first for the organization, which doesn’t usually call for global elimination of things that can trigger chronic disease, Tom Frieden, president of Resolve to Save Lives and a former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told Vox. WHO “successfully led the elimination of other infectious diseases, such as smallpox and river blindness, but never before has the world set its sights on eliminating a noncommunicable disease.”

Trans fats occur naturally in some meats and cheeses, but their biggest gateway into our bellies has been through vegetable oils, margarine, Crisco, and other manufactured foodstuffs that rely on partially hydrogenated vegetable oil. There’s strong evidence suggesting high trans fat consumption is linked to heart problems and a decrease in cognitive functioning, perhaps even serving to speed up decline in folks with early-stage dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.

As with so many studies on isolated ingredients and human disease, it’s unclear how much is too much for human consumption. In any event, mounting public fear of trans fats had U.S. food companies drastically reducing or cutting trans fats entirely from their products long before public health officials stepped in. But as governments, including ours, became increasingly fixated on “solving” obesity and chronic lifestyle diseases, they began turning with increasing animosity toward trans fats.

Denmark became the first country to ban trans fats in 2004. In 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administraiton declared trans fats to be no longer “generally recognized as safe,” a ruling that was finalized in 2015. At that time, the FDA gave U.S. companies three years to phase out trans fats “or seek food additive approval for those uses.” That means we’re in final countdown territory on trans fats now: June 2018 is the trans-fat free deadline.

Ironically, the reason trans fats wound up so prevalent in American diets in the 20th century was because of another nutrition nanny crusade, this time against lard. Convinced that saturated fat was the big trigger behind heart disease, public-health officials and groups (plus the makers of “vegetable fat” products like margarine and Crisco) convinced consumers that animal-fats were bad news and trans-fat laden hydrogenated oils a healthier alternative. The market responded by replacing products high in saturated fat—now generally recognized as much healthier than trans fatty acids—with those that relied on partially hydrogenated vegetable oils.

Now, “if the world replaces trans fats, people won’t taste the difference, food won’t cost more, but your heart will know the difference,” Frieden said.

This, of course, was basically the same pitch used last century to spur the switch from animal-fat-based products to trans-fat based ones. And as some are already noting, “the replacement fats [for trans fats] have their own problems.”

FREE MINDS

Attorneys can’t overrule a clients’ wish to maintain innocence. U.S. Supreme Court justices ruled 6-3 in favor of Robert McCoy, the Louisiana death row inmate whose lawyer said evidence of his guilt was overwhelming and entered a guilty plea on McCoy’s behalf. McCoy—accused of murdering three people in 2008—said he wished to maintain his innocence even if it meant he would surely get the death penalty instead of life in prison. (A jury ended up sentencing McCoy to death regardless of the lawyer’s plea.)

“The Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to choose the objective of his defense and to insist that his counsel refrain from admitting guilt, even when counsel’s experienced-based view is that confessing guilt offers the defendant the best chance to avoid the death penalty,” wrote Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the Court’s decision.

FREE MARKETS

Blockchain? There’s an app store for that. A new company from the former head of J.P. Morgan’s blockchain unit will function like an app store for “decentralized applications.” Called Cloyvr, the company—founded by Amber Baldet and Patrick Mylund Nielsen, another ex-J.P. Morgan employee—has had folks in the crypto world buzzing.

Cloyvr will allow “people and businesses [to] experiment with a multitude of decentralized apps and services, developer toolsets, and underlying distributed ledgers,” reports Fortune. “The cofounders envision the platform serving as a neutral ground, offering a browser-like dashboard for the blockchain-curious, through which Clovyr can provide support and other services to customers according to their needs.”

QUICK HITS

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2rHvpMf
via IFTTT

A Newly Bullish Gartman: “This Weakness Shall Not Last Long”

One of the catalyst cited by traders for yesterday’s late swoon in the market, was the unexpected news that Gartman had turned bullish again saying in his latest letter that “we’ve no choice but to err quietly bullish of shares generally.”

It probably did not take Gartman long to realize that his current trade recos are mutually conflicting: on one hand bullish stocks, on the other, pretending to still be short the 10Y, even though he was clearly stopped out on payrolls Friday when the 10Y dropped below his stop loss of 2.92%…

… a combination which as today’s market has shown means one or the other has to give – quiet simply, it is no longer possible to have stocks, yields, the dollar and oil all rising at the same time.

So one day after his latest flip-flop, what does the man who two months ago made a “watershed” call for a secular market top, think will happen next? Well, good news to the bears: he thinks that “this weakness shall not last long.”

STOCKS, IN GLOBAL TERMS, HAVE FINALLY FALLEN A BIT as seven of the ten markets comprising our International Index have fallen and as three have risen. None, however, have moved  by anywhere near 1%, save for the market in Hong Kong where shares were down 0.9%; however, after the massive run to the upside that shares in Hong Kong have enjoyed over the course of the past week and one half as the Hang Seng has risen from 29,925 on the 4th of  May to yesterday’s “closing” high of 31,515, or an increase of 5.3%, some correction… some consolidation… some profit taking it certainly to be expected.

The same… or very nearly the same… can be said of the US market where the S&P made its low of 2,630 on the 3rd  of May and made its way to 2,730 as of last evening, or an increase of 3.8%; it is become a bit overbought and some consolidation is not only to be expected, it is perhaps almost mandatory.

Finally, to “prove” the near universality of the recent global strength in the equities markets, the markets in Europe collectively made their low on the 3rd of May also and have risen 1.8% over that same interval of time. Thus, this has indeed been a “collective,” well established bullish run in broad global terms and so a reasonably broad, “collective” consolidation is almost de rigueur.

What shall be the catalyst for this correction? The fact that the yield on the US ten-year treasury security is back  above 3.00% shall be sufficient news to account for a bit of weakness. Too, the fact that commodity prices are rising and that inflationary pressures are making themselves known shall account for some of that weakness. Further, the uncertainty that a joint 5Star/Lega government installed in Rome shall account for some of the weakness in European shares. Further, still we can point to the confusion in Southeast Asia and the change in government in Malaysia as a reason for a correction, and further still, we can point to the problems in Venezuela and Argentina as yet another reason.

Finally, we note that the CNN Fear & Greed Index, which has fallen to single-digits several weeks ago marking a very serious over-sold level and which has since then risen to 54 as of last night’s close, has gone from inordinately low levels back to neutrality and is itself due for some consolidation… perhaps even a bit of correction.

In other words, there are reasons a ‘plenty from which a bit of international equity market weakness can and shall develop. Likely, this weakness shall not last long

Did the multi-decade bear market just start?

via RSS https://ift.tt/2rNVp8e Tyler Durden

Police Investigating 12 Virginia Students for Sexting, Could Charge Them With Possessing Child Porn

TextingPolice ae investigating as many as a dozen teenagers at two separate schools in Falls Church, Virginia, as part of an ever-widening sexting inquiry.

Police seized five cell phones and have recovered multiple “explicit images” that students shared with each other on Snapchat and via text messages, according to The Washington Post.

The investigation began when Mary Ellen Henderson Middle School’s school resource officer—the cop charged with keeping the peace on campus—learned that students had been filming fights and possibly circulating nude photos. One cell photo led him to another, and another, and another:

The second male student said the latter photo was of a ninth-grader at George Mason High School in Falls Church and told police he received it from a third male student at Henderson, according to the search warrant.

That led police to a third male student, who told investigators that the ninth-grader exposed her breasts during a live Instagram session and he took an image of it, the warrant says. The third male student admitted to sending that image to the second male student and another male student at Henderson.

Obviously, someone needs to talk to these kids about respecting other people’s privacy, and explain to them that pictures shared on Snapchat don’t magically disappear. To the extent that the illicit activity undermines social cohesion in school, or contributes to bullying, administrators can discipline the kids involved—though they should keep in mind that the point of punishment is to teach the kids to lead more responsible lives, not to ruin said lives.

Unfortunately, police involvement could lead to some very bad outcomes:

Under Virginia law, teens who sext can be prosecuted using the state’s child porn charge, a felony that carries a minimum five-year sentence. In practice, however, such cases more often end with a plea to a lesser charge.

Even lesser charges can have life-altering consequences for young people, making it harder for them to get into college, find jobs, or even form healthy relationships with other teens. We shouldn’t turn kids into pariahs for engaging in incredibly common, age-appropriate—if undesirable—behavior.

Virginia police have a history of pursuing teen sexting cases with misguided zealotry. In 2014, police in northern Virginia sought—and obtained—a warrant to give a teenage boy an erection so that they could photograph it and compare it with the evidence they had already gathered. One of the officers involved later committed suicide after he was accused of sexually abusing minors.

It’s well worth asking, then, whether the police should really be in the business of collecting sexually explicit images of teenagers as part of an effort to hold them criminally accountable. It doesn’t seem like the best use of the cops’ time, and it’s definitely not what’s best for the teens.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2IFwi1z
via IFTTT

US, China “Very Far Apart” On Trade, Ambassador Warns

Despite Trump apparently folding in the ongoing trade war with China by consenting to reingage Chinese telecom ZTE, the two sides remain far apart in the ongoing discussions how to shrink the US trade deficit (and Chinese surplus), and as US Ambassador to China Terry Branstad said on Tuesday, the US wants China to give a timetable on how it will open up its markets to US exports as the two countries are still “very far apart” on resolving trade frictions.

Terry Branstad, US ambassador to China

While a US delegation led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin presented China earlier this month with a list of demands to tackle allegations of intellectual property theft and other trade policies Washington considers unfair, it failed to achieve any success and the two countries failed to reach an agreement on the long list of US demands and decided to resume talks in Washington.

Branstad, who was present at the meeting, said the Chinese appeared to be “taken back” by the significance of the list, and said that “The Chinese have said ‘we want to see the specifics.’ We gave them all the specifics in terms of trade issues. So they can’t say they don’t know what we’re asking for.”

“We’re still very far apart,” Branstad said quoted by the SCMP, adding that China has not met pledges to open up its insurance and financial services area, as well as reduce car tariffs.

“There are many areas where China has promised to do but haven’t. We want to see a timetable. We want to see these things happen sooner than later,” he said at a conference in Tokyo.

Branstad also said US President Donald Trump would like to see a “dramatic increase” in food exports to China. “We’d like to see China being just as open as the United States,” he said.

As is well known, the Trump administration has drawn a hard line in trade talks with China, demanding a US$200 billion cut in the Chinese trade surplus with the United States, sharply lower tariffs and advanced technology subsidies. Trump has proposed tariffs on US$50 billion of Chinese goods under its “Section 301” probe. Those could go into effect in June following the completion of a 60-day consultation period, but activation plans have been kept vague.

Meanwhile, China warned that its own retaliatory tariffs on US goods, including soybeans and aircraft, will go into effect if the US duties are imposed.

Branstad said the United States could rescind the “Section 301” tariffs if China moved forward on opening up its agriculture and car markets.

“I think it could be adjusted,” he said. “It’s possible, depending upon how the trade talks go.” Increasing US exports of liquified natural gas could also be an area the two countries could agree on as trade talks resume in Washington this week, he said.

“The United States and China are the two biggest economies in the world. The more we can work things out, the better it’s going to be not just for US and China, but for the entire world economy,” he said.

On Tuesday morning, just as China’s Vice Premier Liu He arrives with a Chinese delegation in Washington Tuesday through Saturday to continue trade negotiations, Trump tweeted that “Trade negotiations are continuing with China. They have been making hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the U.S., for many years. Stay tuned!”

via RSS https://ift.tt/2KoG5Gx Tyler Durden

Futures Tumble As 10Y Treasury Yields Spike Near 7 Year Highs

As retail sales data printed, 10Y treasury yields spiked to their highest since 2014 (3.0465%) which seemed to spark a notable drop in US equity futures ahead of the open…

10Y Yield is within a fraction of a tick of the 1/2/14 high yield of 3.0516%…

which would take us back to July 2011…

30Y Yields are heading back into their resistance zone…

The Dollar Index is soaring (and the yield curve steepening)…

And that seemed to trigger equity futures selling…

VIX mini-flash-crashed as retail sales printed but as stocks sink, VIX is back above 13…

But, but, but… aren’t rates rising for the right reason?

via RSS https://ift.tt/2IpsnCD Tyler Durden

Retail Sales Growth Slows As Fuel Costs Rise

Following March’s surprising surge in Retail Sales – after 3 months of declines – April saw spending growth slow notably to just +0.3% from a revised-higher March 0.8% gain.

February’s initial decline was also revised to a rise…

 

Core retail sales (ex autos and gas) also slowed and missed expectations suggesting some spillover from higher gas prices…

Under the hood saw every sector see gains in spending aside from Electronics and Appliance Stores, Health and Personal Care, Sporting Goods, and Food Sevice and Drinking Places. Perhaps all feeling the pinch from higher gas prices.

Most notably, the Control Group – which adjusts out food, autos, gas, and building materials – saw YoY growth slow dramatically…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2wHVNKP Tyler Durden

Seminole County, Florida To Accept Crypto For Tax Payment

Authored by Ana Alexandre via CoinTelegraph.com,

The Seminole County, Florida, tax collector Joel M. Greenberg announced May 14 that the county will begin accepting cryptocurrency for payment for various services this summer in order to eliminate heavy fees and improve payment accuracy and efficiency.

image courtesy of CoinTelegraph

According to a press release, the county will begin accepting Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) to pay for services, including property taxes, driver license and ID card fees, as well as tags and titles. The Seminole County Tax Collector will reportedly employ blockchain payments company BitPay, which will allow the county to receive settlement the next business day directly to its bank account in US dollars. Greenberg commented on the initiative:

“We live in a world where technology has made access to services on demand, with same-day delivery and the expectation of highly efficient customer service and we should expect the same from our government. The aim of my tenure in office is to make our customer experience faster, smarter, and more efficient, and to bring government services from the 18th century into the 21st century and one way is the addition of cryptocurrency to our payment options.

With this move, the county reportedly aims to remove risks connected to credit card usage, such as fraud and identity theft. According to BitPay, Seminole county is the first government agency to use the company’s services.

Earlier this month in the state of Arizona, a bill that would have allowed state residents to pay taxes using crypto was amended, removing the provisions which obligated the state to accept crypto. Instead, the bill merely obliges the Department of Revenue to “study” whether a taxpayer may “pay the taxpayer’s income tax liability by using a payment gateway, such as BitcoinLitecoinor any other cryptocurrency.”

Also this month, the city of Berkeley, California moved forward with an initiative to apply blockchain technology to public financing for community projects. The pilot project also aims to decrease the minimum price of a municipal bond from $5,000 to $10-25, which would allow more people to invest in municipal projects they support. Vice Mayor Ben Barlett added that, should the political process allow it, the city could consider issuing a type of token which would function much like a municipal bond in providing city funding.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2jZ9JHm Tyler Durden