Frontrunning: March 30

  • Trump’s Border Wall: A Tall Order (WSJ)
  • Trump’s Hope for Rapid Reset With Russia Fades (WSJ)
  • China’s Xi to meet Trump in Florida next week (Reuters)
  • U.S. Softens Call for Shift on Nafta (WSJ)
  • ESPN Has Seen the Future of TV and They’re Not Really Into It (BBG)
  • Inside the Leadership Shakeup at Merrill Lynch (BBG)
  • States’ Next Target on Sales Taxes: Sellers on Amazon (WSJ)
  • South Africa’s Zuma considers stepping down early in deal to oust Gordhan (Reuters)
  • Zuma to Face Mass Cabinet Walkout If He Fires Gordhan (BBG)
  • U.S., Turkey Set on a Collision Course (WSJ)
  • Ackman Is ‘Profoundly’ Sorry for $4 Billion Valeant ‘Mistake’ (BBG)
  • ‘You Are All Liars’: Toshiba Shareholders Vent After Westinghouse Bankruptcy (WSJ)
  • Malaysia mistook slain Kim Jong Nam for South Korean (Reuters)
  • JPMorgan in Talks for Dublin Office That Holds 1,000 People (BBG)
  • North Carolina lawmakers reach deal to repeal transgender bathroom law (Reuters)
  • Chinese women golfers may shun LPGA event amid South Korea tensions (Reuters)
  • This Chinese Stock Soared 4,500% on the Nasdaq and No One Knows Why (BBG)
  • Amazon Wants Cheerios, Oreos and Other Brands to Bypass Wal-Mart (BBG)
  • Spain’s Mom and Pops Are Hurting (BBG)

 

Overnight Media Digest

WSJ

– The Trump administration is signaling to Congress it would seek mostly modest changes to the North American Free Trade Agreement in upcoming negotiations with Mexico and Canada, a deal President Donald Trump called a “disaster” during the campaign. http://on.wsj.com/2nBRZ7E

– Westinghouse Electric Co filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection Wednesday, setting off a showdown between the nuclear power company’s Japanese parent and a major U.S. utility, and threatening to drive a wedge between governments of two countries over the fate of industries each considers vital. http://on.wsj.com/2ni79fx

– British Prime Minister Theresa May on Wednesday began the UK’s path out of the European Union, highlighting her country’s security expertise as she started the clock on negotiations that will challenge ties between Britain and some of its closest allies. http://on.wsj.com/2ofj1j9

– Negotiations between New York real-estate developer Kushner Cos and a large Chinese company over a planned $7.5 billion tower in Manhattan collapsed amid an outcry over possible conflicts of interest involving the Trump administration. http://on.wsj.com/2nAiVED

– Federal regulators plan to reverse an Obama-era rule that prevented major television-station owners from buying stations or readily selling themselves, a move that could touch off a wave of deals among media companies. http://on.wsj.com/2nikcgj

– Two black women have filed a lawsuit against Fox News Channel, its parent company 21st Century Fox and a former senior executive at the cable network alleging racial discrimination. http://on.wsj.com/2oi0fIa

 

Canada

THE GLOBE AND MAIL

** Cenovus Energy Inc is bulking up in a C$17.7 billion ($13.3 billion) deal to more than double its production as the repatriation of Canada’s oil sands winnows control of the resource to a handful of domestic players. https://tgam.ca/2obmrX7

** Bombardier Inc said its new Global 7000 luxury jet brushed the speed of sound as it confirmed testing for the new airplane remains on track for a planned entry into service in the second half of 2018. https://tgam.ca/2obr57w

** Former Torys LLP lawyers Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick are suing the Law Society of Upper Canada for damages totalling C$22 million, alleging the regulatory body was malicious in its prosecution of them over alleged errors in their work for Hollinger Inc more than 15 years ago. https://tgam.ca/2obras5

NATIONAL POST

** Britain has officially filed for divorce from the European Union, but Canadian companies with a footprint in the UK still face a lengthy period of uncertainty as the details of the split are sorted out. http://bit.ly/2obu8gd

** TransCanada Corp lost its go-to guy on tough pipeline projects with the surprise retirement of its 51-year-old chief operating officer, Alex Pourbaix. http://bit.ly/2oboBpH

** Canadians will be able to invest in a basket of marijuana companies when the first marijuana exchange-traded fund launches next week, helping investors diversify their exposure to the volatile and frothy sector. http://bit.ly/2oblNsQ

** The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan is continuing to hunt for deals in the United Kingdom, even as concrete steps were taken Wednesday to extricate Britain from the European Union. http://bit.ly/2obpr5P

 

Britain

The Times

* Members of parliament are demanding that banks and regulators do more to crack down on security failings that mean contactless cardholders can be defrauded months after their cards are stolen or lost. http://bit.ly/2nNnFr0

* Some of the world’s biggest sovereign wealth funds will pledge 650 million pounds (about $808.66 million) in new investments for Heathrow on Thursday in what will be regarded as a significant boost after Article 50 was triggered. http://bit.ly/2oAeKWS

The Guardian

* Lloyd’s of London will announce on Thursday that it has picked Brussels as the base for its new European Union subsidiary to secure a European foothold after UK’s departure from the EU. http://bit.ly/2nN1lOo

* German Chancellor Angela Merkel has rejected one of Theresa May’s key Brexit demands, insisting negotiations on Britain’s exit from the European Union cannot run in parallel with talks on the future UK-EU relationship. http://bit.ly/2nMEEtH

The Telegraph

* Britain’s car makers have warned that Brexit poses the “biggest threat in a generation” to the car manufacturing industry. http://bit.ly/2obnWVA

* Howard Shore, the man who set up City stockbroker Shore Capital Group Ltd at the age of 24, has stepped down as the group’s chief executive after over three decades in charge. http://bit.ly/2nNvvku

Sky News

* Prime Minister Theresa May has triggered Article 50 after her letter to European Council President Donald Tusk was delivered by Ambassador Tim Barrow in Brussels. http://bit.ly/2oxRN6S

* Sky News has learnt that James Gorman, Morgan Stanley’s chairman and chief executive, told Theresa May that other cities had made compelling approaches to lure parts of its business from London during the nine months since the EU referendum. http://bit.ly/2nicdQq

The Independent

* The London attack last week was a “wake up call” for technology companies, the head of the Metropolitan Police said on Wednesday. Tech companies including Google and Facebook have come under scrutiny recently for not doing enough to stop extremist content being hosted on their networks. http://ind.pn/2njaLhl

 

via http://ift.tt/2nmZiNG Tyler Durden

Ex-Jefferies Banker Fined For Using WhatsApp To Share Confidential Data

For years, bankers and buysiders assumed that moving away from conventional messanging services like AOL or the ubiquitous Bloomberg Chat to discuss confidential information, would spare them the attention of regulators and enforcers. That, however, changed today when the UK regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority imposed a fine of £37,198 on a former Jefferies banker for sharing confidential client information over WhatsApp. “The FCA found that Mr Niehaus failed to act with due skill, care and diligence.”

According to the FCA announcement, Niehaus, who was a managing director at Jefferies, received client confidential information and, on a number of occasions between 24 January and 16 May 2016, shared that information with both a personal acquaintance and a friend, who was also a client of the firm. 

In one of the instances where Mr Niehaus shared client confidential information with his friend, who was also a client of the firm, that information was about a competitor.  Mr Niehaus used the instant messaging application WhatsApp to share this information. The information was shared by Mr Niehaus because he wanted to impress the people that he shared the information with.

 

The details of the information he shared included the identity of the client, the details relating to the client mandate and the fee Jefferies would charge for their involvement in the transaction.  Mr Niehaus also boasted about how he may be able to pay off his mortgage if one of the deals was successful.

Niehaus provided full admissions to the FCA and was given a 15% reduction to the financial penalty, the FCA announced. Niehaus also agreed to settle during the stage 1 settlement period; but for this, the FCA would have imposed a penalty of £53,140.

Now if regulators shift their attention to the Mecca of confidential banker data “sharing”, Snapchat, they would promptly refill any outstanding budget gaps.

via http://ift.tt/2njlNT7 Tyler Durden

“I Don’t Want That”: Ryan Opposes Trump Working With Democrats On Obamacare

With House Republicans said to make another push to pass Obamacare, perhaps as soon as next week according to a Bloomberg report, some have speculated whether Trump will engage democrats this time to assure at least a few votes from across the aisle. Overnight, however, House Speaker Paul Ryan poured cold water on the idea, saying he does not want President Donald Trump to work with Democrats on overhauling Obamacare.

In an interview with “CBS This Morning” that will air on Thursday and which was previewed by Reuters, Ryan said he fears the Republican Party, which failed last week to come together and agree on a healthcare overhaul, is pushing the president to the other side of the aisle so he can make good on campaign promises to redo Obamacare.

“I don’t want that to happen,” Ryan said, referring to Trump’s offer to work with Democrats.

Carrying out those reforms with Democrats is “hardly a conservative thing,” Ryan said, according to released interview excerpts. “I don’t want government running health care. The government shouldn’t tell you what you must do with your life, with your healthcare,” he said.

On Tuesday, Trump told senators attending a White House reception that he expected lawmakers to reach a deal “very quickly” on healthcare, but he did not offer specifics. “I think it’s going to happen because we’ve all been promising – Democrat, Republican – we’ve all been promising that to the American people,” he said. Trump said after the failure of the Republican plan last week that Democrats, none of whom supported the bill, would be willing to negotiate new healthcare legislation because Obamacare is destined to “explode.

Meanwhile, speaking to Bloomberg, two Republicans said that leaders are discussing holding a new Obamacare repeal vote next week. The ray of hope for Trump and Ryan is that members of the Freedom Caucus, which was instrumental in derailing the bill, have been talking with some Republican moderate holdouts in an effort to identify changes that could bring them on board with the measure. 

A renewed attempt to pass Obamacare repeal would come after President Trump and Republican leaders in Congress said they would move on to issues like a tax overhaul in the wake of last week’s drama, when the long-awaited bill was pulled 30 minutes ahead of a scheduled floor vote. Asked if the GOP health bill will come up again, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said, “Yes. As soon as we figure it out and get the votes.”

Quoted by Bloomberg, Kevin McCarthy said nothing is currently scheduled and didn’t indicate how leadership would resolve divisions between the Freedom Caucus and moderates in the so-called Tuesday Group. “Lot of people are talking,” he said. “Lot of people are working.”

For now, it is nothing but noise.

via http://ift.tt/2oeaMHk Tyler Durden

S&P Futures Fade Overnight Gains As Euro Slides; China Stumbles

Asian shares and oil are lower, European shares are little changed, and S&P futures are fractionally in the red after gaining for most of the overnight session, perhaps troubled by warnings from two Fed presidents who warned that markets and valuations appear frothy, and the Federal Reserve may have to raise rates more times than currently forecast. The latest round of Fed hawkishness helped the dollar gain further after recent losses which earlier this week pushed it to 4 month lows. That said, overnight the USDJPY appeared to fade much of yesterday’s gains, dipping back under 111 around the European open, only to see another unexplained jerk higher shortly before 6am eastern.

Summarizing some of yesterday’s key macro events, SocGen’s Kit Juckes writes that “the unnamed ECB source is back, telling Reuters that markets had over-interpreted Mario Draghi’s comments at the last meeting and that a further rise in bond yields would be problematic. Cue lower bond yields, and a slightly weaker Euro. If this morning’s preliminary March German CPI data deliver the expected base—effect-induced slip from 2.2% to 1.6%, we can look forward to this trend going a little further. I’m not sure how far we can go in the absence of a return of political concerns however. The FX market doesn’t have a significant Euro long position that can be flushed out (it probably has a small euro short, instead). And I’m not convinced that interest rate expectations can go that far.”

Juckes was right, and the EURUSD indeed slid further after a series of weak German regional CPIs, which has seen continued pressure following yesterday’s ECB rumors and hawkish Fed commentary. European traders will now look at German prices which are expected to rise 1.8% from the year before after CPI accelerated 2.2% in February.

The ECB’s dovish tone has once again established the diverging outlook between U.S. and European monetary policy, manifesting itself in some recent spread widening between German and US 10-Year yields.

Juckes had some observations on this too, and said that “in recent months, the US/German nominal yield differential has overtaken the real yield differential in terms of its correlation with EUR/USD. Both are better-correlated with the exchange rate than shorter-dated rates. The 10-year yield spread had narrowed from a wide position of 235bp in late December to as little as 196bp last week and is back above 200bp this morning. If the ECB is trying to anchor bond yields (and if they succeed in limiting how much they follow US moves), then the real driver of EUR/USD for a while will be what happens to US yields. The 2.3-2.65% range looks pretty strong and dooms EUR/USD to its current 1.04-1.09 range. That’ll change if the ECB’s view of the world changes after the French elections (which i suspect it will) and there’s a greater tolerance of higher Bund yields in particular. But for now, we’re stuck.”

Back to equities, where we find Asian shares turning mildly lower on Thursday after touching near two-year highs.  MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan was down 0.2 percent, stepping back from morning trade when it nudged close its loftiest levels since June 2015. Australian shares firmed 0.4 percent, helped by an overnight gain in oil prices. 

China stocks were headed for a fourth day of losses amid worries over property market prospects, sharp declines in newly-listed stocks, and liquidity stress as the month-end approached. The CSI300 index was down 1.0 percent, while the Shanghai Composite Index lost 1 percent.

The tightening trend in China continued, with the one-day loan rate on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, which reflects demand from non-bank financial institutions, jumping before a long weekend (China markets closed Monday and Tuesday) and as the PBOC holds off on using a liquidity tool for the fifth day in a row. The overnight repurchase rate traded on the Shanghai exchange surges as much as 21.67% points to 32%, before closing at 14.96%; in Hong Kong’s offshore market, yuan tomorrow next forward points surge as much as 44 points, the most since Jan. 25. The PBOC again skipped reverse-repurchase operations for the fifth day in a row, taking net withdrawals during the period to 290 billion yuan due to maturities. On the first two days, the PBOC cited “high liquidity,” then over the next two days it referred to “appropriate liquidity.” On Thursday the monetary authority said that there was “high liquidity” in the banking system, and that fiscal spending toward the end of the month offsets reverse repo maturities.

In Europe, the Stoxx Europe 600 Index rose 0.1% at 10:29 a.m. in London after closing Wednesday at the highest since December 2015; the Germany’s DAX continues to close in on record highs seen in 2015.

The dollar index, which tracks the U.S. currency against a basket of six major rivals, was slightly up on the day at 100.030 . It was lifted to a one-week high overnight as the euro slipped on concerns about the impact of Brexit as well as news that ECB policymakers are keen to reassure investors that their easy-money policy is far from ending.  Sterling steadied at after skidding to a one-week low of $1.2377 previously.

“Brexit, to some extent, has been covered in the market already. People went short, covered, and went short again,” said Kaneo Ogino, director at foreign exchange research firm Global-info Co in Tokyo. “As for the dollar, demand is still steady from pure commercial orders, but the Japanese fiscal year ends this week and Tokyo investors don’t want to take new positions,” Ogino said.

Despite the dollar’s gains on the day, it was far lower than levels above 115 yen hit a few weeks ago, and Japan’s Nikkei stock index shed 0.8 percent. “Investors have bought Japanese stocks mainly because of the strong dollar-yen trend. Trump’s healthcare defeat threw a wet blanket on the Japan market’s rally since last November,” said Takuya Takahashi, a strategist at Daiwa Securities.

As we observed yesterday, comments from Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren and San Francisco Fed President John Williams also backed multiple rate hikes, though those officials are non-FOMC voters.

“There’s a huge political fog around the world, in Asia, in the U.S., but underneath it, there’s actually quite a decent economic recovery. And that’s what’s driving markets more than the worries about politics,” said Sean Taylor, Asia Pacific chief investment officer at Deutsche Asset Management.  “The U.S. is continuing to do well. Europe isn’t doing as badly as it was and because of the commodity pickup last year, emerging markets are doing okay,” he said.

The commodity space saw some profit taking, with West Texas Intermediate dropping 0.3% to $49.38 a barrel, after surging 2.4% on Wednesday after a bigger-than-forecast decline in U.S. gasoline stockpiles. Gold slipped 0.2 percent to $1,250.48 an ounce.

Today, traders will look for the latest data on jobless claims and personal spending.

* * *

Bulletin Headline Summary from RanSquawk

  • German regional CPIs add pressure on the EUR which continues to remain out of favour from yesterday’s source comments
  • Away from the German data, European equities have had a slow start to the morning with little in terms of firm direction
  • Looking ahead, highlights include US GDP, Fed’s Mester, Kaplan, Dudley and Williams

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures unchanged at 2,357.00
  • STOXX Europe 600 up 0.09% to 378.87
  • MXAP down 0.5% to 148.19
  • MXAPJ down 0.2% to 482.36
  • Nikkei down 0.8% to 19,063.22
  • Topix down 0.9% to 1,527.59
  • Hang Seng Index down 0.4% to 24,301.09
  • Shanghai Composite down 1% to 3,210.24
  • Sensex up 0.1% to 29,564.01
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 up 0.4% to 5,896.23
  • Kospi down 0.1% to 2,164.64
  • German 10Y yield fell 0.9 bps to 0.335%
  • Euro down 0.2% to 1.0740 per US$
  • Brent Futures down 0.2% to $52.30/bbl
  • Italian 10Y yield fell 2.4 bps to 2.137%
  • Spanish 10Y yield fell 0.5 bps to 1.638%
  • Brent Futures down 0.2% to $52.30/bbl
  • Gold spot down 0.3% to $1,250.22
  • U.S. Dollar Index up 0.1% to 100.13

Top Overnight News

  • Trump Travel Ban Blocked for as Long as Court Battle Goes On
  • Oil Stays Above $49 as U.S. Fuel Demand Blunts Crude Supply Gain
  • Zuma Said to Face Mass Cabinet Walkout If He Fires Gordhan
  • Turkey’s TAI Renews 787 Dreamliner Parts Contract With Boeing
  • Autodesk Says It Expects Revenue Growth in Next Two Quarters
  • Hikma, Vectura Fall as Mylan Advair Generic Fails to Get Nod
  • Great Elm Capital to Start Tender Offer for Up to $10m in Shrs
  • Lazard’s Peter Kuo to Join Canyon Bridge as Founding Partner
  • GE CEO Says ‘Climate Change Is Real,’ Science ‘Well Accepted’
  • GE Renewable Energy Gets $56m Hydro Contract in China
  • Lululemon 1Q EPS View Misses Est.
  • Partners in Leviathan, Aphrodite Mull Joint Gas Pipeline: Delek
  • Ford South Africa Recall to Include Fiesta Model: Star

Asian equities traded mostly in the red after the region shrugged off the mostly positive lead from Wall Street where the energy sector outperformed following a smaller than expected build in DoEs. Nikkei 225 (-0.8%) failed to benefit from a weaker JPY amid fiscal year-end rebalancing, while ASX 200 (+0.4%) bucked the trend and was led by the strength in the commodities complex. Hang Seng (-0.3%) and Shanghai Comp. (-1.0%) were dampened despite a positive earnings report from Big 4 bank China Construction Bank, as the PBoC refrained again from conducting open market operations for the 5th consecutive day while there were also reports the Trump administration are to make preparations to keep large tariffs on Chinese goods. 10yr JGBs were lower despite the cautious risk tone with demand
dampened after the latest weekly securities transactions data showed foreign investors increased their selling of Japanese bonds by more than 3-fold, while today’s 2 year auction also failed to provide any meaningful support with the b/c and lowest accepted price below prior. PBoC refrained from open markets operations again, which resulted to a net daily drain of CNY 40bIn.

Top Asian News

  • PBOC Seen Raising Money Rates Twice This Year in Leverage Battle
  • Thailand Says National Oil Co. to Be Set Up Only When Time Right
  • Hong Kong Feb. Retail Sales Value Fall 5.7% Y/y; Est. -0.6%
  • Ajinomoto Seeks Overseas Deals With $1.8 Billion War Chest
  • Kotak Mahindra Bank Approves Issue of Up to 62m Shares
  • China’s Xi to Meet Trump Next Week at Mar-a-Lago, Xinhua Reports
  • Posco Almost Doubles Profit as Global Steel Rally Sustained

In European markets, the notable highlight of the morning has come in the form of the regional CPIs from Germany, which have generally printed lower than previous, while also coming in under the expected figure for the national reading. The softer CPI numbers have seen upside in Bunds. While periphery yields are lower in tandem this morning, with much of the attention here falling on the supply from Italy, which was relatively well digested. Away from the German data, European equities have had a slow start to the morning with little in terms of firm direction. On a sector specific basis, energy names are the significant outperformers, with this coming in tandem with WTI futures briefly retaking USD 49.50/bbl to the upside. Elsewhere H&M are firmly at the bottom of the Stoxx 600 after a downbeat sales update.

Top European News

  • Italy Finance Chief Says Le Pen Victory Would Add Permanent Risk
  • May’s Opening Brexit Bid to Tie Security to Trade Hits Wall
  • OPEC Oil-Cuts Extension Unlikely, Russian VEB Economist Says
  • SNB Will Scrap Negative Rate as Soon as Possible, Maechler Says
  • H&M 1Q Pretax Beats; New Brand to Be Launched in 2H

In currencies, the euro fell 0.3 percent to $1.0736, after declining 0.9 percent over the previous two days. The British pound was little changed. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose 0.2 percent.  Not too much to note in the FX markets other than some calm in GBP trade. Some modest weakness seen early on, but this looks to have dissipated in the wake of the Article 50 activation yesterday. All eyes on EUR/GBP to see whether the usual month end flow will impact, but the pair looks well contained in the mid 0.8600’s for now. From the EUR perspective, regional German inflation has softened in March, while the EU wide sentiment indices for business and consumers have missed on expectations, softening a tad on the month also. EUR/USD has drifted (very) steadily lower through the session, but we expect to find support around 1.0700 – if we get there – with close to 2 yards rolling off at the NY cut later today. USD/JPY has traded a very tight range around 111.00, with limited movement in UST yields to trade off. The key 10yr rate is hemmed inside 2.35-2.40%, with the recent Fed speak doing little to spark fresh movement on the curve. More to come from Mester, Kaplan, Williams and Dudley, but we see little that can change sentiment other than from Yellen herself. Hard data now counts for more – as the FOMC consistently communicate data dependency – with core PCE prices due out alongside the final reading of Q4 GDP today and the usual weekly claims data.

In commodities, the broader recovery in the global risk mood looks to have aided the rise in base metals if nothing else, with little to differentiate in terms of the latest gains seen across the board. Copper gains have pushed tentatively through USD2.65, and is struggling a little, with similar price action elsewhere. Given the recent pull-back in the USD, some would have expected a little more upside, which has also helped Oil prices to a modest degree, but the lower rise in inventory as reflected in both the DoE and APIs has largely been the driver here, further ‘supported’ by the disruptions in Libya. WTI still struggling ahead of USD50.00 however. Gold still trading on a USD1250.00 handle, as Silver is above USD18.00, with the tentative recovery in the greenback prompting cautious trade from here.

On today’s calendar, in the US this afternoon we’ll get the third and final revision to Q4 GDP (expected to be nudged up to +2.0% qoq annualized) along with core PCE. The latest weekly initial jobless claims print will also be released. It’s another busy day for Fedspeak with Mester, Kaplan, Williams and Dudley all scheduled to speak. Over at the ECB board members Praet and Nowotny are also due to speak this morning. Also worth watching today is a meeting between President Trump and head of the National Economic Council Gary Cohn where it is expected that the President will be briefed on outlines over options for tax reform.

US Event Calendar

  • 8:30am: GDP Annualized QoQ, est. 2.0%, prior 1.9%; Personal Consumption, est. 3.0%, prior 3.0%; GDP Price Index, est. 2.0%, prior 2.0%; Core PCE QoQ, est. 1.2%, prior 1.2%
  • 8:30am: Initial Jobless Claims, est. 247,000, prior 261,000; Continuing Claims, est. 2.03m, prior 1.99m
  • 9:45am: Bloomberg Consumer Comfort, prior 51.3

Central Banks

  • 9:45am: Fed’s Mester Speaks in Chicago on Payment System Improvement
  • 11am: Dallas Fed’s Kaplan Speaks in Washington
  • 11:15am: Fed’s Williams Speaks at Learning Community Event in New York
  • 4:30pm: Fed’s Dudley Speaks in Sarasota

DB’s Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

So the grind higher in markets following the AHCA vote debacle last week continues to trudge along in a fairly orderly fashion. With the S&P 500 nudging up another +0.11% yesterday the index is now up +1.68% from Monday’s low point and has barely looked back. We’ve highlighted a few times this week that we think that Trump trades had already been priced out to a large degree and so therefore the disappointment over last Friday’s news may be limited with global growth being the most important factor for now. Indeed it perhaps tells you something that yesterday was the third lowest volume day for the S&P 500 this year and the VIX declined for the fourth session in a row and is not far off the lows of the recent year to date range again. While politics will continue to be an important theme – indeed there are reports this morning suggesting that Republicans are considering a resurrection of the healthcare bill vote again next week – global data surprises are approaching six-year highs and for now it feels like this might be the more important near term driver.

The more significant moves in markets yesterday however came in bonds where yields fell across the board seemingly sparked by a Reuters story which suggested that ECB policymakers are becoming wary of making any new change to their policy message next month. This follows concerns at the ECB that the market over interpreted the message sent out at its March 9th meeting and were swift to start pricing in hikes. The article stated that the intention of the ECB was to communicate reduced tail risk but that instead the market took it as a step to the exit. The article also quoted its sources for the report saying that a previously mentioned deposit rate hike prior to the unwind of QE purchases “would be a communication nightmare” and that “if you raise rates, you can’t communicate that it’s a one-off” and that instead “the market would immediately price in a new rate path”.

As is always the case with these stories there’s always a validity question with regards to the origin of the content and in this case the report quotes ‘six sources’ without any more specifics. That said there’s no smoke without fire and bond yields were quick to move lower in the wake of the story hitting the wires. By the end of play 10y Bund yields had finished 4.5bps lower at 0.342% and are now at the lowest yield in 3 weeks. Yields in Spain, Italy and Portugal fell 4.6bps, 2.3bps and 6.0bps respectively also. Market implied pricing for a 15bp hike in the deposit rate was also pushed back from April 2018  to August 2018 midway through the day. The story also appeared to be attributed to the decent bid for Treasuries which saw the 10y yield tumble 4.1bps and hit the lowest closing yield, at 2.377%, since February 27th. That was despite a chorus of relatively hawkish Fedspeak which we’ll touch on shortly. The Euro (-0.45%) was also the second worst performing G10 currency yesterday while European Banks fell nearly -1% intraday but pared losses to a more modest -0.21% decline. Still, that was in the context of a +0.33% gain for the broader Stoxx 600 after the energy complex rose on the back of a +2.36% rise for WTI Oil and the most in two weeks.

Away from that there was also a close eye kept on UK PM Theresa May’s statement to the House of Commons yesterday as well as the official withdrawal letter following the confirmation of Article 50 being triggered. In a nutshell there wasn’t a huge amount new on the UK side of things compared to what was revealed in the government’s White Paper last month. As our economists noted the UK continues to want to reach agreement on a comprehensive new deal with the EU27 in parallel with the terms of the divorce by March 2019, an unrealistic timetable and one the EU27 opposes. From the EU27 side, EU Council President Donald Tusk responded with a statement of his own and the EU Council released an official statement. The body language from Tusk was negative. Tusk mentioned damage limitation as the primary goal. Combined with last week’s comments from Commission negotiator Barnier on the priority of divorce negotiations and recent press reports, an early assessment of the EU’s stance is that they plan to offer the UK a take-it-or-leave-it option (settlement of the divorce including the UK’s budgetary commitments, then a limited transitional deal), but are preparing for a hard outcome. So with mutually contradictory goals and significant political obstacles for compromise it looks set to be a long drawn out negotiation process with the two year clock now quietly ticking away.

It’s also worth highlighting that today the UK government will release a White Paper concerning the repeal of the EU acquis, and its translation into domestic law. Our economists highlight that this is important for negotiations as the EU27 argue the UK will have to remain under the authority of the ECJ under a transitional deal. On April 27th a special EU Council will be convened to discuss the broad framework for the negotiations. Detailed negotiations are only likely to start in June. In the next few days, it will also be worth closely monitoring rhetoric from both the UK and EU27. So a few things to watch out for.

To the latest in Asia now where bourses have slowly drifted lower over the course of the session despite there being little in the way of newsflow. The Nikkei (-0.25%), Hang Seng (-0.40%), Shanghai Comp (-0.86%) and Kospi (-0.23%) are all in the red while the ASX (+0.30%) is just about holding on to gains. It’s possible that the moves reflect some quarter end profit taking following a strong run for Asia equities so far this year. Futures in the US are little changed and in commodities Oil is holding onto yesterday’s gains while Gold is slightly lower. Back to that Fedspeak yesterday which as we briefly mentioned earlier was fairly hawkish despite limited market reaction. Boston Fed President Rosengren said that “my own view is that an increase at every other FOMC meeting over the course of this year could and should be the committee’s default”, in other words suggesting that he favours 4 hikes this year. This was a view somewhat echoed by the San Francisco Fed President Williams who said that he “would not rule out more than three increases total for this year” and also that the Fed could look to begin shrinking its balance sheet before knowing the size it ultimately should be.

Away from that the economic data was especially thin on the ground yesterday. In the US pending home sales rebounded +5.5% mom in February and more than expected. In the UK mortgage approvals nudged down to 68.3k while net consumer credit printed at £1.4bn in February which was a slowdown compared to the £1.6bn average over the prior six months.

Before we look at today’s calendar, it’s worth highlighting that yesterday our Global Economics Perspectives team published a new report in which they provide ‘quick’ answers to a list of questions they have received from clients globally in recent days. The bulk of the questions this week have been on policy (both fiscal and monetary) and the team also detail their views on US growth and inflation prospects. You can find the link to the report here https://goo.gl/AtY36U.

To the day ahead now where this morning in Europe we’ll be kicking off with the latest confidence indicators for the Euro area before we then get the March CPI report out of Germany. Over in the US this afternoon we’ll get the third and final revision to Q4 GDP (expected to be nudged up to +2.0% qoq annualized) along with core PCE. The latest weekly initial jobless claims print will also be released.

It’s another busy day for Fedspeak with Mester (1.45pm GMT), Kaplan (3.00pm GMT), Williams (3.15pm GMT) and Dudley (8.30pm GMT) all scheduled to speak. Over at the ECB board members Praet and Nowotny are also due to speak this morning. Also worth watching today is a meeting between President Trump and head of the National Economic Council Gary Cohn where it is expected that the President will be briefed on outlines over options for tax reform.

via http://ift.tt/2nyFIPE Tyler Durden

Mark Cudmore: “Why I Don’t Believe In This US Equities Bounce”

Over the past dew days, Bloomberg market commentator Mark Cudmore has been decidedly skeptical of any rebound observed in US stocks, and overnight he did not change his sentiment despite what some have said is an attempt for the reflation rally to reassert itself. In a note titled “Why I Don’t Believe in This U.S. Equities Bounce” he explains why, giving seven reasons why despite stocks seemingly poised for a third day of gains, he refuses to BTD and chase the latest rally.

From Bloomberg

Macro View: Why I Don’t Believe In This U.S. Equities Bounce

 

U.S. equity futures are headed for a third day of gains, with consensus growing that the March correction is already over and record highs will soon be hit again. I’m not so positive and here’s why:

  • The prospect of imminent Trump stimulus has been severely undermined, both in terms of size and timing, as it’s now quite clear that the U.S. president will face a struggle in everything he wants to do.
  • The hard economic numbers in the U.S. continue to disappoint even though survey data is strong.
  • While commodities are trading positively this week, most remain well below their February peaks, reflecting a lack of exceptional real demand.
  • Wednesday saw the second-lowest transaction volume of 2017 for S&P 500 stocks, which indicates a lack of conviction in the bounce.
  • With both month-end and quarter-end rebalancing flows, this week was always expected to be choppy, meaning it’s important not to read too much into every little move; what’s more relevant to note is that equities are still below their opening level from last week.
  • Also, consensus 2017 trades — long dollar, short Treasuries, short pound -– have done poorly in March, which is a blow to risk appetite.
  • The summary is that the fundamentals have shifted negatively. I’m absolutely not a structural bear on U.S. equities, but I do believe that the change in fundamental outlook warrants lower prices in the coming weeks.

That said, he echoes what RBC’s Charlie McElligott said earlier this week, when he described the market as binary, and admits that as technically the bounce is starting to look solid, “bears need the rally to fail very soon or admit defeat.” He look forward to what Dennis Gartman will say today for validation if we may be nearing a new, downward inflection point.

via http://ift.tt/2nCRrOM Tyler Durden

You Know It’s A Global Debt Bubble When…

With analysts noting that markets are "taking the Fed's tightening policy in their stride," demand for emerging-markets debt is so strong that Bloomberg reports one of Asia's poorest nations is mulling a debut dollar-bond sale… Papua New Guinea.

Source: BBC

The southwest Pacific nation plans to raise $500 million in five-year bonds, central bank governor Loi Martin Bakani said Tuesday at the Credit Suisse Asian Investment Conference in Hong Kong. The country would join Mongolia among sub-investment grade issuers in 2017. Sales of high-yield bonds total almost $15 billion so far this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

“There is strong appetite for frontier issues — and markets have taken the Federal Reserve tightening policy in their stride,” Stuart Culverhouse, chief economist at Exotix Partners LLP in London, said by phone. Issuers in the single-B tier — the second-highest in the junk rating scale — have found yields “are not prohibitively high for their financing needs,” he said.

Papua New Guinea aims to woo buyers from Asia, Europe and the U.S. for its bond sale in the second half of the year. This isn’t the country’s first attempt, after it hired banks in 2013 for an issue of dollar-denominated securities that didn’t pan out, despite the same confidence from bankers…

“Increasing signs of improvement in the global economy have made investor appetite for riskier assets resilient,” said Rees Kam, a strategist at SJS Markets Ltd., a Hong Kong-based financial services company that specializes in fixed income.

 

There’s demand from yield-seeking investors and they have to move to a lower credit rating to pick up some extra yield. Countries going to the market are trying to benefit from the rising demand for lower-credit products.”

Success this time would follow several years of current-account surpluses for the natural-resource dominated economy — though the period has seen slower growth and wider fiscal deficits.

Mongolia, which has been struggling with a shrinking economy, ballooning budget deficit and debt downgrades, benefited from a rebound in copper and the prospect of an International Monetary Fund rescue package to pull off its sale of $600 million seven-year debt earlier this month.

Sri Lanka is also planning a $1.5 billion bond sale.

The big question now is – when does North Korea come to the market? Think of all that uranium collateral?

via http://ift.tt/2odWkiF Tyler Durden

Bad Brexit Deal Better Than No Deal? Mathematical Idiocy!

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

At the top of the list of absurd Brexit advice is the notion that a bad deal is better than no deal.

But that’s what Andrew Duff at the European Policy Center says.

Drop the Clichés

 

The British side should stop pretending that ‘no deal is better than a bad deal’. It is not. In fact, there’s really nothing worse than no deal. So it’s not a clever tactic for the UK to start off negotiations by repeating a cliché that at best nobody believes and at worst sounds mildly threatening.

Mathematical Idiocy!

The position of Duff is mathematical idiocy. The EU demands as much as €60 billion in exit fees, adherence to four principles (that the EU itself does not follow), fishing rights, etc.

Giving into those demands, or most of them, is like leaving for no reason at all.

Clearly, no deal is better.

Duff is nothing more than a staunch “Remainer” who refuses to accept reality.

€60 Billion in Exit Fees

Eurointelligence takes to task the notion that €60 Billion is remotely close to a starting point for negotiations.

Werner Mussler offers the most detailed account of the financial issues we have seen so far. The €60bn have several components, the largest being a back-of-the-envelope calculation on the EU’s open positions, also known as “reste à liquider“, spending commitments made in the past that have to be paid in the future. They stood at €217bn as of end-2015, and are likely to grow to €240bn by end-2018. Britain’s part would be about €29bn. In reality, that position would be lower since many of these funds are never called.

 

The second large position regards pension payments to EU employers – not just British – as the EU does not distinguish between UK and other nationals. Locking in a British net contribution for the lifetime of these payments seems ludicrous to us, but it is fair, of course, that the UK pays at least for the pensions of EU employees who are British nationals. If the EU insists on the UK paying for the pension of non-UK nationals post-Brexit, there can be no Brexit agreement. Mussler concludes that the €60bn is a purely political number.

 

We found ourselves in rare agreement with Holger Stelzner, the FAZ’s conservative economics editor, who asks what kind of community the EU is that wants to penalize a member state for exiting. He also notes that there is no legal basis for the €60bn claim.

Surrender

Duff would pay the full bill on the absurd grounds that a “bad deal is better than no deal”. The UK may as well hoist the white flag and sue for peace in Duff’s absurd model.

Theresa May Has Things Correct

Not partial membership of the EU, associate membership of the EU, or anything that leaves us half-in, half-out. We do not seek to adopt a model already enjoyed by other countries. We do not seek to hold on to bits of membership as we leave. No deal for Britain is better than a bad deal for Britain.” Theresa May, 17 January 2017

Odds of No Deal

May’s position makes perfect sense mathematically. Nonetheless, Bloomberg writer Simon Kennedy repeats the nonsense A Bad Brexit Deal May Be Better Than No Deal After All.

Walking away with no regime for 230 billion pounds ($287 billion) of annual exports to the bloc and the 3.3 million Europeans in the U.K would be “perfectly OK,” says Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson. Not “frightening” at all, says Brexit czar David Davis.

 

But analysts are painting an entirely different picture of an outcome they view as increasingly plausible: An official in May’s government puts the chance of the talk collapsing at about 30 percent. EU negotiator Michel Barnier this week said the bloc should ready to deal with the “serious consequences” of a breakdown, such as longer queues at borders to how to handle transportation of nuclear materials.

Fearmongering

Kennedy drones on and on about all the ways the UK would lose. Here are just two examples.

For manufacturers, World Trade Organization tariffs averaging about 5 percent — and twice that for cars produced by the likes of Ford Motor Co. — would be immediately imposed on trade with the EU, the market for 44 percent of Britain’s overseas sales. Farmers could face duties of around 40 percent and most industries would suffer higher import costs if Britain imposed its own tariffs on trade from the EU.

 

Jordan Rochester, a London-based strategist at Nomura International Plc, predicts the pound would slump towards $1.15, extending its post-referendum slump to almost a quarter.

Not once did Kennedy note what the UK might lose.

Let’s assume (I suspect falsely) the pound slumps to $1.15 from $1.25. That’s would take 8% off WTO tariffs averaging 5%. The UK would hardly get hammered in such a scenario, at least from an export standpoint.

In contrast, add another 8% to EU exports to the UK. Who is the big loser here?

Nonetheless, I suspect the odds of no deal are higher than most believe. Stubborn EU nannycrats will be to blame should that happen.

Merkel Hardens Stance

The Express reports Merkel TOUGHENS Brexit stance amid concerns over EU’s future as May prepares for talks.

In an interview with the Financial Times, finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble said: “We have no interest in punishing the UK, but we also have no interest in putting European integration in danger over the UK.

 

With Germany preparing for general elections in the autumn, fears over populist campaigns in other parts of the world – including Donald Trump’s election win, Geert Wilders’ narrow loss in the recent Dutch election and the increasing prominence of Marine Le Pen in France – has led to a surge in support for pro-EU campaigns.

 

The Germany finance ministry claims: “Any Article 50 agreement will have to include the UK’s assurances that it will honor the financial commitments it undertook as an EU member state.”

 

Norbert Spinrath, Brexit spokesman for Mr. Schulz’s Social Democrats, warned: “We expect the British to do the honorable thing. If they don’t, the EU can take them to the international courts.”

No Deal Better

Telegraph writer Edgar Miller gets it correct: Don’t worry about Brexit negotiations, no deal is better than what we have now with the EU

In response to Theresa May’s view that “no deal is better than a bad deal”, Donald Tusk – subsequently joined by Pascal Lamy and Jean-Claude Juncker – made it clear they believe such a scenario would, in fact, be bad for the UK.

 

While some of this rhetoric can be seen as the first plays of a negotiating strategy, the answer to this challenge is crucial for the UK Government to understand. The answer, based on our detailed analysis at Economists for Free Trade, is actually not as complicated as many will have you believe. Our work shows that not only is the WTO option better than a bad deal, it can actually be better than the deal we have at the moment.

 

First, however, we must deal with the myths surrounding what is misleadingly called the “WTO option”. It’s a misleading term because every option for the UK in its new trading arrangement will be a “WTO option”, given that the UK will take up its full (founding) membership of the WTO and will trade under its rules once we leave the Single Market.

 

In fact, there is no other way we can leave, regardless of whether we have done a deal with the EU or not. The WTO will be merely the referee in our trading relationships, as it already is with other trading nations of the world such as the US, Japan, India, and so on.

 

We can reduce tariffs across the board (including to zero) or, for example, reduce tariffs on selected goods that we do not produce in the UK. Most importantly, if we do not reach a free trade agreement with the EU, it will be the choice of the UK to decide what level of tariffs it sets against the EU and – consequently – the rest of the world. It is that one single decision that will decide whether the UK will prosper or not in this new trading environment.

 

So what happens if we remove tariffs against the EU (and the rest of the world), even if the EU (and the rest of the world) does not reciprocate? In summary, a standard world trade model shows unilaterally removing tariffs creates a long-term GDP gain of 4 per cent, a fall of 8 per cent in consumer prices, and an increase in Treasury revenue of more than 7 percent, compared to the status quo.

 

About half of this gain comes from eliminating our tariffs on goods imported from non-EU countries, abolishing our relatively few non-trade-barriers, and eliminating the CAP and its associated levies. The other part of the gain are tariffs on manufactured goods with the EU that average about 3.5 percent on our exports to the EU; about 4.8 percent on their exports to us. If we do not implement our 4.8 per cent tariffs on the EU, then we achieve the full 4 percent gain.

 

Clearly, this will be a better situation than we have today – a massive gain for the consumer – even though the EU may have raised tariffs against us, no other country may have reciprocated our zero tariffs, and we will have “fallen off the cliff” into the dreaded WTO.

 

Of course, it is also possible to pursue free trade through a series of free trade agreements with the rest of the world. Under this approach, the UK would not unilaterally eliminate import barriers but would attempt to achieve the same objective via negotiating such agreements.

 

Finally, producers need not suffer in order that consumers benefit. Our research shows that manufacturing – aided by Sterling’s lower exchange rate (likely to last for several years) – can prosper without protection. Even without the benefit of a lower currency, a modicum of productivity improvement coupled with new opportunities to re-source supply chains at better value from both the UK and the rest of the world will allow manufacturers to compete successfully.

 

Thus, the decision is not complicated, the WTO is not be dreaded, and there are clear economic benefits to the UK of embracing free trade, irrespective of how negotiations with the EU turn out. No deal really is better than the status quo and Mr. Tusk and his colleagues would do well to remember that during the next two years.

Edgar Miller makes perfect sense.

As I have stated many times, the first nation that truly embraces free trade will be a winner regardless of what any other nation does.

Related Articles

  1. “Me First” Philosophy: G20 Waters Down Free Trade Language
  2. Reflections and Reader Comments on Free Trade: “China Doesn’t Play Fair!”
  3. Squawking Parrots vs. Mish on Free Trade
  4. Brexit Question on Free Trade
  5. Readers Question Free Trade; Does Nonreciprocal Free Trade Cost Jobs? Paul Krugman “Was” Right!
  6. Disputing Trump’s NAFTA “Catastrophe” with Pictures: What’s the True Source of Trade Imbalances?

It is a very rare treat to encounter a genuine free trade advocate.

via http://ift.tt/2oBAdPp Tyler Durden

Bezos Bursts Above Buffett To Become World’s Second Richest Man

On the heels of the melt-up in US mega-cap tech stocks, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has leapt past Amancio Ortega and Warren Buffett to become the world’s second-richest person.

 

 

As Bloomberg reports, the 53-year-old founder of Amazon.com Inc. added $1.5 billion to his net worth on Wednesday, the day after the e-commerce giant announced it will buy Dubai-based online retailer Souq.com, and has added over $7 billion since the global equities rally began following the election of Donald Trump as U.S. president on Nov. 8.

Bezos has a net worth of $75.6 billion on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. That’s $700 million more than Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s Buffett and $1.3 billion above Ortega, the founder of Inditex SA and Europe’s richest person. Buffett, who’s added $1.7 billion in 2017, has shed $4.7 billion since his fortune peaked at $79.6 billion on March 1. Ortega is up $2.1 billion year-to-date.

Bezos remains $10.4 billion behind Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, the world’s richest person with $86 billion.

If AMZN topped $1000 – while MSFT flatlined – Bezos would take Gates.

via http://ift.tt/2niR4W5 Tyler Durden

Konstantin Richter: “The Dirty Dozen” – 12 ‘Things’ That Ruined The EU

Authored by Konstantin Richter via Politico.eu,

Last weekend, European leaders gathered in Rome for the 60th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome. They discussed, not for the first time, how to get the EU back on track. And they told each other they are still committed to the Union and believe in its future. (We’ve heard that one before, too.)

But let’s just suppose that, when the European leaders sat down for lunch at the Quirinal Palace, some of them had a little too much of the pinot grigio and waxed nostalgic about the days when the idea of a united Europe was still young and promising and beautiful. And then they talked about this week and how British Prime Minister Theresa May would send her goodbye letter and they started slurring their words, saying Grexit, Brexit, Frexit, and they finally admitted to each other that something has gone horribly wrong.

When they stood up and got ready to leave, they were devastated, saying to each other: “Good God, how did it come this and, more importantly, who is to blame?” We’ve gathered a dozen suggestions.

1. Zeus

Whenever Europe is in trouble, its advocates claim the EU lacks a proper narrative. The whole idea of an “ever-closer union” is still a fine one, they argue, and the only thing that’s needed for people to understand it is a memorable story. The most memorable story about Europe, of course, is the one about Zeus. The Greek God disguised himself as a white bull in order to approach a beautiful girl called Europa. When Europa, perhaps naively, climbed on his back, the God-turned-bull abducted and ravished her. No need to take the story too literally when analyzing the EU’s current malaise (no white bulls there). But it is good to keep in mind that Europe’s founding myth doesn’t exactly bode well for its future. If negative narratives about the EU seem to resonate far more than positive ones, maybe it’s because the Greek gods loaded the dice.

2. Edith Cresson

Going straight from Zeus, ruler of Mount Olympus, to good old Edith Cresson may seem a bit of a stretch. But as a strong contender for the title of worst European commissioner ever, the Frenchwoman does have a claim to fame, too. In the early 1990s, Cresson was a French prime minister who quickly fell out of favor and was forced to resign after less than a year in office. That apparently qualified her for a high-powered job in Brussels. As commissioner for science, research and development, Cresson famously paid her dentist to be a scientific adviser. In 1999, allegations of fraud intended to target Cresson ended up bringing down the entire Commission. To put it crudely: Cresson did to the EU what Zeus did to Europa.

Christoph Blocher in Bern during a session of the Swiss National Council in 2013 | Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images

Christoph Blocher in Bern during a session of the Swiss National Council in 2013 | Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images

3. Christoph Blocher

Look at any map of the European Union and what stands out is the blank spot at its core. The holdout is Switzerland, mountainous, beautiful and immensely wealthy. The Swiss owe their status as successful non-members to a man named Christoph Blocher. Back in the early 1990s — when Geert Wilders was still a young parliamentary assistant with funny hair, Marine Le Pen just the daughter of right-wing populist Jean-Marie Le Pen, and in Germany the letters AfD stood for Allgemeiner Finanzdienst, a financial services firm that has since changed its name — the Swiss industrialist led a successful referendum campaign against the path to EU membership.

Blocher knew how to push the right buttons and arouse in the Swiss a deep fear of outsiders, be they from Brussels or the Balkans. His blend of anti-immigration and anti-EU politics would provide the blueprint for populist campaigns elsewhere. What’s more, the Alpine nation made a strong case that the economic benefits of close relations with the EU can be had without fully joining the club. (Norway provides another fine example.)

4. Brussels

Some decades ago, when the EU’s founding member countries were looking for a place to house institutions such as the European Commission and the European Council, they thought they had found something suitable. It was a city located halfway between the glamorous French capital of Paris and the not-so-glamorous West German capital of Bonn. And it was called Brussels, like the famous sprouts. The French hoped the Belgian capital would turn into a twin city of Paris, populated by sophisticated graduates of the Grand Écoles. What they got instead was the European Quarter, an architectural nightmare, more Brasilia than Paris, that is oddly isolated from the indigenous people in its vicinity. Brussels may not be the “hellhole” U.S. President Donald Trump described but, as anyone who has worked there knows, the EU capital lacks atmosphere. As a result, Europe’s de facto capital has been struggling to attract the kind of talent that would happily flock to more inspiring places, such as Paris or Amsterdam. Maybe even Bonn would have been a better choice.

François Mitterrand in 1983 at China's Great hall of the people, in Beijing | Gabriel Duval/AFP via Getty Images

François Mitterrand in 1983 at China’s Great hall of the people, in Beijing | Gabriel Duval/AFP via Getty Images

5. François Mitterand

There are quite a few people who’ve been given the moniker “Father of the euro.” (The mother of the euro wasn’t around when the currency was conceived.) Most of these fathers were economists. But Europe’s single currency was predominantly a political project, not an economic one — and blaming economists for its failings is missing the point. François Mitterand, the charismatic French president, knew a lot about the art of political intrigue and far less about monetary policy. Looking to subdue the strong Deutschmark (which he called “Germany’s force de frappe,” or nuclear weapon), he kept pushing for a single currency — and found an ally in German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, also more of a political animal than an economic one.

When the Berlin Wall fell and Kohl needed international support for Germany’s reunification, the French president, allegedly, negotiated a quid pro quo, convincing the Germans to give up the Deutschmark. But the father of the euro did not live long enough to see that things wouldn’t go according to plan. The German economy flourished in the eurozone, the French one didn’t, and the EU, as a whole, would have been better off without its wayward child.

6. Antigone Loudiadis

This list of villains would be incomplete without at least one specimen of the scheming investment banker. Our candidate goes by the name of Antigone Loudiadis. Accordingly, there’s a whiff of Greek drama to her story. Loudiadis was a whip-smart Goldman Sachs banker and worked with Costas Simitis’ government back in the early noughts, when the Greeks were desperately seeking to join the eurozone. The Anglo-Greek banker was instrumental, allegedly, in devising complex derivative trades to hide the country’s true debt level. In a Sophocles play, our heroine would have met a terrible fate, perhaps buried alive and mourned by a chorus of elderly Thebans. In contemporary Europe, she lived happily ever after, eventually founding a London-based insurance company and running it as CEO.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

7. The unnamed EU official

There are some 50,000 people working for the EU, depending on how you count. Though their names can be looked up in the organization’s vast databases, they mostly toil in anonymity, and the vast majority of EU citizens would likely not be able to name a single commissioner. In the popular imagination, Brussels has become a present-day version of Kafka’s castle, dominated by faceless paper pushers who work for opaque entities called DG something-or-other and invent regulations concerning the length of cucumbers.

That sentiment may not do justice to what unnamed EU officials actually do. But what do they do? It’s safe to say that the EU hasn’t done enough to capture the hearts and minds of the people. There’s no stylish image campaign, no employee-of-the-month program, not even a Pirelli calendar with sexy bureaucrats posing in attractive office cubicles.

Boris Johnson at St Paul's Cathedral in London | WPA pool photo by Ian Gavan/Getty Images

Boris Johnson at St Paul’s Cathedral in London | WPA pool photo by Ian Gavan/Getty Images

8. Boris Johnson

They say the flapping of a butterfly’s wings can cause a hurricane somewhere thousands of miles away. In the early 1990s, Boris Johnson (the butterfly in this case) was the Daily Telegraph’s correspondent in Brussels — and an early exponent of a literary genre called the “Euromyth.” One such Euromyth, headlined “Delors plans to rule Europe,” was read in far-away Denmark where the Danes were holding a referendum on the Maastricht Treaty. In Johnson’s telling (not to be trusted, of course), the Telegraph story mysteriously tipped the balance, triggering a Nej and leading to all kinds of repercussions that still reverberate today. What’s more, the incident sold Johnson on the fun of flapping his wings, which he did to even greater effect in early 2016 when he joined the Vote Leave campaign, eventually effecting a tornado called Brexit. If Johnson has his way, he’ll enter the history books as the only man who ruined the EU not once, but twice.

9. The Swabian housewife

Rumors that the Germans are making sacrificial offerings to a deity called the Swabian housewife are probably exaggerated. But Chancellor Angela Merkel did invoke the German goddess of austerity when the financial crisis hit, saying that, like the Swabian housewife, she thinks one shouldn’t live beyond one’s means. Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble is a believer, too, stubbornly opposing debt relief and stimulus programs. Keynesian economists countered by coining the term “Swabian-housewife fallacy.” They argue that what makes sense on an individual level, meaning personal finances, can wreak havoc in international politics, meaning the EU. (But then again, some EU governments could have used a tad of that Swabish housewifeliness in the run-up to the euro crisis.)

Belgian soccer player Jean-Marc Bosman at the European Court of Justice in December 1995 | STF/AFP via Getty Images

Belgian soccer player Jean-Marc Bosman at the European Court of Justice in December 1995 | STF/AFP via Getty Images

10. Jean-Marc Bosman

This Belgian football player didn’t have much of a career. He stopped playing in his twenties, was sentenced to jail for assault and now lives unemployed and underfunded in Liège. Nevertheless, Bosman had more of an impact on European club football than any other player around. In the early 1990s, when his contract had lapsed, he sued his Belgian club for, effectively, not letting him go. The case went to the European Court of Justice, which ruled that clubs cannot demand transfer fees when contracts have expired. The court also decided that quotas restricting the number of EU foreigners in club teams had to go.

All of that made sense from a legal perspective. But football fans only see what happened as a result: sky-high salaries and transfer fees for star players, a handful of elite clubs who came to tower above the rest, club teams composed entirely of non-nationals. The fans feel that football had been taken away from them. Most of them vent their anger against the evil forces of globalization, liberalization and commercialization. But those in the know blame Bosman — and EU law.

11. Viktor Orbán

What was Angela Merkel thinking when she opened the German borders to refugees in September 2015? Critics charged the German chancellor with failing to consult with the rest of the bloc before she made her decision, and with aggravating a refugee crisis that has threatened to tear Europe apart. What is often overlooked is that Merkel didn’t act entirely of her own volition. The Hungarian government led by Viktor Orbán put refugees on buses heading for Austria and Germany — and tricked the chancellor into taking an idealistic stand on migration. There would have been no German Willkommenskultur without Hungarian idegengyülölet, or xenophobia.

Signature of the Treaty of Rome on March 25, 1957 | AFP via Getty Images

Signature of the Treaty of Rome on March 25, 1957 | AFP via Getty Images

12. The Treaty of Rome

Rome stood at the beginning of a proliferation of treaties. Keeping track of what exactly was agreed upon in Nice, Maastricht, Lisbon and elsewhere has become increasingly difficult. There have simply been too many meetings and too many documents named after too many cities. If EU leaders keep meeting like this, we’ll eventually have the Toledo Treaty and the Clermont-Ferrand Regulations. Incidentally, Rome is also where the principle of the “ever-closer union” first popped up. Entire dissertations have been written in defense of that idea. Indeed, closer reading shows that, according to the document, only the European people were meant to engage in “ever-closer union,” not (necessarily) governments, central banks or entire armies. But somehow “ever-closer union” became a synonym for the EU’s self-aggrandizement anyway.

Now that Britain is leaving, a little more modesty wouldn’t hurt. So here’s an idea: EU leaders could meet again next weekend, have some more wine and solemnly agree that their utmost goal is to keep the European people “from drifting ever-further apart.” That sounds about right and not too fancy. All that’s needed is a suitable name. How about the Pinot Grigio Declaration?

via http://ift.tt/2oBkujm Tyler Durden

Despite Record Highs, Brexit Still A Losing Bet For Dollar Investors

One day after UK PM Theresa May officially unleashed the Article 50 letter proclaiming the beginning of the end of Britain within the EU, the UK stock market had rallied over 16% since the vote that elites said would bring armageddon. However, remove the support of a collapsed currency and things look very different for a US dollar investor.

The UK’s FTSE 100 – whose megacap members get the majority of their revenue from outside the UK – looks very different when adjusted for the depreciation of the pound.

In fact, for a dollar investor, they remain underwater since the Brexit vote, having never seen a ‘return to even’ since, thanks to the near 19% collapse in cable…

 

Even as dollar investors in Japan, Germany, and the US seem to have done uniformly well…

via http://ift.tt/2nCqjzi Tyler Durden