AAPL Tumbles After Report Of 70-80% Plunge In iPhone Chip Shipments

Apple share are tumbling (as are the entire complex of suppliers) following a report from Nikkei that Taiwan Seminconductor’s shipments of iPhone 6s, iPhone 7 chips for June-Dec. period will likely shrink 70%-80% vs year earlier. As one anayst noted, a decline of more than 20-30% is not in consensus estimates. As Bloomberg reports, of particular interest is that this cut to orders is about upcoming iPhone 7, not about the well-publicized iPhone 6 slowdown.

The timing would be right about now for early wafer starts for silicon for September launch of iPhone 7… and it seems market participants agree…

 

“No brainer” investors in AAPL have now seen no price change since April 2012…

 

However, as Bloomberg reports, for investors contemplating prospects for the smartphone market after a shaky earnings report from Apple, Asian suppliers just provided a few hints: It’s going to get worse before it gets better.

Three suppliers that seldom command much attention, working behind the scenes to make devices sold under the brands of better-known customers, put out back-to-back earnings reports Tuesday. They spell trouble ahead for smartphone makers and other companies that once thrived on mobile mania.

 

Pegatron Corp., which assembles iPhones, missed profit expectations and said April sales dived 16 percent. Minebea Co., which makes LED lights for mobiles, lagged its own forecasts for revenue and earnings. Japan Display Inc., which supplies screens to Apple and others, said profit has deteriorated so rapidly it will lose money for the fiscal year and suspend a promised dividend. Adding to the gloom, Lenovo Group Ltd. tumbled to a four-year low as analysts warned of rising competition.

 

Asian components makers are positioned early in the supply chain so they often signal what’s ahead for giants like Apple, Samsung Electronics Co. and Xiaomi Corp. The iPhone maker offered evidence of a deteriorating market with its first quarterly sales decline in 13 years. Now, some are bracing for a possible triple-whammy: sliding sales, an unfettered market-share competition and crumbling prices.

“The smartphone industry will continue to slow down this year,” said Richard Ko, a Taipei-based analyst at KGI Securities Co. “Competition will worsen and prices will likely continue to fall.”

via http://ift.tt/1UVJIWs Tyler Durden

The Frogs Are Boiling Again – Why Wall Street Stays In The Pot

Submitted by David Stockman via Contra Corner blog,

Tuesday’s spasm of machine rage begs a question. After the S&P 500 has chopped sideways for 600 days in no man’s land either side of 2060, and given the baleful headwinds now gathering from all points in the global economy, there is absolutely no reason to stay in the casino.

At that session’s closing level of 2084 there was, at best, a 2% upside back to the May 2015 high of 2130, and a momentary one at that. In the other direction stood the prospect of at least a 40% of downside to 1300 (15X current shrinking earnings of $87/share) when the third great central bank bubble of this century inexorably bursts.

Anyway, the likelihood was that the machines would take it all back at the first chance. That was Wednesday.
^SPX Chart

^SPX data by YCharts

So why do the frogs of Wall Street stay in the boiling pot?

Some do because they are perma-frogs. Not having been boiled for 7 years, they have apparently forgotten the pain.

Jeffrey Saut of Raymond James, for instance, told CNBC today that the water is actually still a tad on the cool side. Why earnings this year are projected at $118 per share and next year’s looking like $135.

So that’s a perfect 15.4X and, besides, we are not merely heading for a second half rebound from the Q1 GDP bottom. According to Saut, public policy is fixing to get more effective and supportive of the market, too.

You could wonder, of course, whether he had Hillbama or Wild Man Trump in mind as to the latter point. Or you could just say the man feels no heat because he has wetted himself in his own Cool-Aid and be done with it.

But either way, he’s not alone. Wall Street’s sell side machinery can’t seem to let loose of its perma-hockey stick or faith that Washington’s bailout squad stands at the ready. Accordingly, punters believe they have perpetual leave to stay in the pot.

In March 2014, for instance, the street consensus was for operating earnings of $137  per share in 2015. The year’s done now, and the outcome was 37% lower at $100 per share.

But never mind. In March 2015 the hockey stick for 2016 also pointed to $135 per share, including $30.91 per share in Q1. The latter’s now mostly in too, and it came 33% short at $20.70 per share. So the full year has already been marked down to $115 per share and there are still nine months to go.

Yes, Saut is right. The estimate for the LTM period ending in December 2017 is currently $134.15 per share. But then it always is—-meaning that the magic 15X doesn’t mean anything at all.

What actually explains the lack of fear is the false narrative of financialization and the absolute dominance of capital and money markets by central bankers wedded to a primitive Keynesian economic model. Along with their camp followers on Wall Street, the latter have propagated an alternative reality that is based on rank speculation, not capitalist enterprise.

For instance, there has been no meaningful growth of breadwinner jobs, real household incomes, labor inputs to the business economy or real net investment since the turn of the century, or even longer. But no matter. The BLS establishment survey says that jobs are being created at a healthy monthly rate. According to our Keynesian monetary masters that means rising incomes, spending and growth are just around the corner.

No they are not. The establishment survey is not a survey; its a cycle-adjusted model projection that is always a day late and a dollar short when it comes to macroeconomic turning points.

As elaborated in a nearby post, the “labor market conditions index” has a far better record anticipating an oncoming recession. As shown below, it has generally issued warning signals a year in advance, and is doing so now.

The next chart is a calculation of the cumulative value of LCMI (each month is the sum of all previous months). We’ve highlighted the peaks and recession starts. The cumulative value peaked anywhere from 3 to 17 months prior to the five recessions during the time frame of this indicator. The average is 9 months. We are now four months beyond the most recent post-recession peak in December 2015.

screen shot 2016-05-10 at 1.16.29 pm

 

The above shouldn’t be surprising. The domestic expansion cycle is already long in the tooth at 84 months, and it is now being battered by an unprecedented global deflation. The latter originated in China’s Red Ponzi, has cascaded through its global EM supply base where exports and output are plunging, and is leaping up on the shores of Japan and Germany-led Europe, as well.

In fact, Japan is entering its second recession since embarking on the madness of Abenomics, and German industrial production has now dropped for two months in a row. On the margin, as China’s $30 trillion credit and madcap construction bubble finally collapses, the export of high-end capital goods and luxury products to China from Europe and Japan is slumping, too.

But the global credit bubble has reached its apogee—–with total debt outstanding having exploded from $40 trillion in the mid-1990s to a growth-smothering total of $225 trillion at present. During the interim, debt grew at a rate nearly 4X faster than GDP, but now the laws of arithmetic and sound money are catching up.

That is, the world is at Peak Debt and more money pumping can have only one result. Namely, a finally blow-off of liquidity driven financial market bubbles, and a race to the currency bottom.

The desperate stop/go monetary machinations in China should be proof enough. After the lunacy of last year’s stock market bubble in which upwards of $4 trillion of market cap was created between March and June 2015, an even crazier commodity bubble has just exploded and then burst—-all within the last 45 trading days.

But then again, when you generate new debt at a rate of $4 trillion per year or 40% of GDP, as the Red suzerains of Beijing did during Q1, monumental bubbles are exactly what should be expected.

The frogs of Wall Street, of course, have no clue. Even as the water temperature rises to the boiling point, you can still hear them declaiming that the crude oil bottom is in and that commodities and the materials sector is on the mend. Load up on some Exxon and BHP!

Needless to say, the global deflation is just getting started and the US economy has not decoupled from the world in the slightest—even if Donald Trump wants to make it so.

Macy’s disastrous Q1 results, which included a 6% decline in same store sales, are as indicative as anything else. Management pointed out that US sales charged to foreign credit cards plunged by 20% and that its stores in Texas and elsewhere in the energy belt have now taken an unexpected turn for the worse. Exactly.

The fact is, domestic business sales are down by 5% from their mid-2014 peak, and inventory ratios have climbed to outright recessionary levels. Likewise, CapEx is weakening rapidly, domestic trucking and rail indices have lunged into negative territory and even subprime fueled auto sales are rolling over.

Last time the Fed’s money-pumping exercise in bubble finance ran out of steam in 2007, an unmistakable “X” appeared in the labor market data. That is, the index of labor conditions rolled over in January 2007, even as the monthly BLS job count continued to rise, adding nearly 1 million “new jobs” before peaking 12 months later in January 2008.

Alas, another year later 4.5 million of these peak “jobs” had disappeared—–on the way to an eventual plunge of 9 million.

Here’s the thing. About 90% of Q1 earnings are now in, and the S&P’s LTM EPS has posted at $87 per share. That figure, of course, is the GAAP number reported to the SEC on penalty of jail time.

Accordingly, actual profits are down by 18% from the $106 per share peak of September 2014, and that means Wall Street’s frogs are now boiling in water that has heated to 23.7X.

But don’t tell the Jeffrey Saut brigade. The abominable “X” is back, too, and even the casino empties out when recession actually hits.

But that’s not the half of it. Wall Street’s cockeyed faith that another stock market bailout is on the way rests on the idea of a post-election return to fiscal stimulus—-since even the casino punters now see that the jig is up on ZIRP, NIRP and QE.

Here’s the problem. When General (Paul) Ryan gets together in the oval office with either Hillbama or the Donald next February the budget projections will already be deep in trillion dollar deficits under current policy. Therefore what will get stimulated, if anything, is a colossal political firestorm over who bankrupted the nation.

There will not be another fiscal stimulus this go round. This time the frogs of Wall Street will be left to boil.

via http://ift.tt/24O2AK0 Tyler Durden

WTI Crude Tops $47 To 6-Month Highs After IEA Forecast

Following IEA’s report this morning which proclaimed OPEC production at record highs but forecast a drop in the global oil glut in the first half of the year (due to demand from India, as the current marginal demand driver – China’s teapot refiners – have since slowed dramatically), WTI crude prices have jumped back above $47 for the first time since November 2015.

Strength in the first quarter was driven by China, Russia and by transport fuel use in India, which is “taking over from China as the main growth market for oil.”

 

As Bloomberg reports, the global oil surplus in the first half of this year will probably be smaller than previously estimated because of robust demand in India and other emerging nations, the International Energy Agency said.

Supply will exceed demand by an average of 1.3 million barrels a day in the first six months of 2016, down from the 1.5 million projected a month ago, following surprisingly strong consumption in the first quarter, the Paris-based adviser said in a report. Still, further gains in oil prices “are likely to be limited by brimming crude and products stocks,” it predicted.

 

“Changes to the data in this month’s report confirm the direction of travel of the oil markets towards balance,” said the agency, which advises 29 of the most industrialized nations on energy policy. “The global supply surplus of oil will shrink dramatically later this year.”

 

The diminished glut indicates that OPEC’s policy, driven by de facto leader Saudi Arabia, to let lower crude prices re-balance world markets is taking effect. Oil futures closed at a six-month high above $46 a barrel in New York on Wednesday as supplies were tightened by declining U.S. drilling, wildfires in Canada and disruptions in Nigeria.

Of course, the glut remains at ‘unprecedented’ levels and any rally will be self-defeating as we already heard from various US shale producers who will come back online heavy once prices hit $50..

via http://ift.tt/1sgQE5V Tyler Durden

“Wild Scene” Outside Trump Meeting: Media, Protesters, Gawkers And Even A Bagpiper

As with any other time Trump makes a public appearance, scores of protesters, media and gawkers – including a bagpiper – gathered outside the Republican National Committee on Thursday morning hoping to catch a glimpse of Donald Trump, some protesting, some adoring, and some just curious. As the Hill puts it simply: a “wild scene.”

The presumptive GOP presidential nominee briefly waved to the crowd, giving onlookers a thumbs-up, after emerging from a caravan escorting him to meetings with House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus and other party figures.

About a dozen pro-immigrant activists staked out the entrance leading into the RNC, holding signs and chanting into a megaphone condemning Trump and the Republican Party.

One protester wore a massive paper mache Trump head, while others carried signs saying that “trump is a racist.” Several were with the protest group Code Pink, which has a regular presence on Capitol Hill.

Dozens of media outlets, including top anchors from the major networks, crowded the sidewalk with cameras pointed at the closed doors of the RNC. Capitol Hill staffers lingered on their way to work, taking in the scene.

As reported earlier, Trump has a full day of meetings on Capitol Hill as he seeks inroads among the GOP leaders who have been hesitant to embrace his candidacy.

In addition to his clutch meeting with Paul Ryan who last week said he wasn’t ready to endorse Trump, Trump will also meet on the Senate side of the Capitol with GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and other Republican senators.

Meanwhile, the full press media circus is on in full force.

via http://ift.tt/1sgQE5T Tyler Durden

Donald Trump Arrives For “Showdown” With Paul Ryan In Washington

Following today’s eagerly anticipated summit between Paul Ryan and Donald Trump, don’t expect a joint press conference or photo op. As the Hill notes, Ryan is showing no signs that he’s prepared to swiftly endorse Trump when they emerge from their huddle at Republican National Committee (RNC) headquarters on Thursday morning.

Instead, the first formal sit-down between the presumptive GOP presidential nominee and the Speaker of the House, under the watchful eye of a multitude of TV cameras and reporters, represents more of an opening bid in the relationship between a Manhattan billionaire one step from the presidency and congressional leaders trying to protect their House and Senate majorities, not to mention the GOP brand.

As a reminder, Ryan delivered a stunning blow to Trump, appearing on CNN and declaring he was “not ready” to support or endorse the real estate mogul and reality TV star. The move was surprising to many because Ryan has repeatedly insisted in interviews this year that he would unequivocally back whoever won the nomination. Ryan together with Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus will be discussing how to get out of the uncomfortable impasse at the RNC headquarters on Capitol Hill.

It’s not only Ryan (R-Wis.) who’s hesitant to get aboard the Trump train. While many rank-and-file members are pressuring the Speaker to rally behind Trump, others are still deeply disturbed by the candidate’s controversial comments and actions related to Mexicans, Muslims, women, POWs, the disabled and white supremacists. And influential conservatives are pushing the candidate to clarify his confusing positions on such issues as tax increases, raising the minimum wage and abortion.

As NBC adds,  the differences between the wonky House Speaker and the brash billionaire go far beyond personality. Ryan has staked his career on conservative policies including sweeping entitlement reforms, while Trump has thumbed his nose at much of the traditional Republican Party policy orthodoxy in favor of a more populist vision. Ryan told reporters Wednesday that he wants the meeting to focus on substantive efforts at finding common ground.

“What we are trying to do is to be as constructive as possible, to have a real unification,” he said. “To pretend we’re unified without actually unifying, then we go into the fall at half strength,” he added. “This election is too important to go into an election at half strength.” Ryan and Trump have met in person only once before in 2012, and spoke over the phone in March. Ryan has said he would step down as chair of the GOP convention in July if Trump asks him to.

Following Trump’s meeting with Ryan and Priebus, the real estate mogul will meet Republican leaders in both the House and Senate, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Ryan will also attend the House leadership meeting.

A spokesman for Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt told NBC News, “The senator will use the opportunity to remind him that what we say and how we say it matter in making it clear that our common goal is defeating Hillary Clinton and guiding America in a new direction.”

Trump said it was his goal to unite the GOP after rivals Ted Cruz and John Kasich ended their 2016 bids last week. But since becoming the party’s de facto nominee he wasted no time in engaging in the kinds of rhetoric many in his party had feared, continuing to accuse Clinton of “playing the woman card” and attacking her and her husband for the former president’s sex scandal.

He may have a tough time: many influential conservatives are pushing the candidate to clarify his confusing positions on such issues as tax increases, raising the minimum wage and abortion.

“A lot of people want to know what Mr. Trump’s policies are. I’d like to know what his policies are as well,” said Rep. Bill Flores (R-Texas), who is chairman of the 170-member Republican Study Committee (RSC) and, like Ryan, has not yet endorsed.

Asked if he were on board, Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) replied: “With our [House GOP] agenda.”

“With Donald Trump?” a reporter followed up.

“With our agenda,” said Wenstrup, whose state will play host to the Republican National Convention in July.

As the Hill adds, the stakes for the meeting, and the Republican Party, are huge.

Several polls released in the last two days have suggested a close race between Trump and likely Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Trump is seeking to unite the GOP behind his White House bid, and many Republicans are ready to get behind him with the argument that Clinton must be stopped short of the White House. Others, echoing Ryan, aren’t there yet and are worried about whether the maverick Trump will lead congressional Republicans to a landslide defeat in November.

GOP aides said there would not be a joint Trump-Ryan news conference after the meeting but that Ryan will hold his usual end-of-week news conference in the Capitol later Thursday. As for the media-hungry Trump, it’s unclear whether he will address the gaggle of reporters after the meetings. The last time he visited the RNC, he sneaked in and out through a back alleyway entrance, giving only a wave from afar.

Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-Tenn.), a Trump surrogate, is working to schedule a meeting between the candidate and the far-right House Freedom Caucus in the near future, caucus members confirmed. And Flores said Trump should make an effort to meet with the conservative RSC as well.

“I think it would be beneficial for him to reach out to as many members of Congress as he can,” Flores said in the interview. “If I were a presidential candidate, I would definitely reach out to the largest caucus in the conference.”

Meanwhile, House leaders plan to ask Trump on Thursday to meet with the entire 246-member GOP conference at a later date, as is customary for the party’s presidential nominee, said Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who will sit in on one of the several meetings with Trump. “A lot of members don’t know him,” said McCarthy, a Trump delegate from California. “And anytime you want to unify the party, you have the nominee there with the entire conference so that everybody can ask questions and get answers directly.

Then again, everone knew John Boehner who accordint to many managed to divide the GOP far more than Trump ever could.

As for Ryan’s decision not to back Trump, he’s faced some backlash, but it hasn’t been enormous — probably because Ryan has spent the past six months as Speaker reaching out to rank-and-file members, building relationships with them and giving them opportunities to shape policy decisions. That’s a marked difference from how the public now views Ryan.

A new Public Policy Polling survey showed him underwater, with 44 percent of Republicans disapproving of the way he’s doing his job and 40 percent approving. In November, nearly 70 percent of Republicans supported Ryan becoming Speaker.  “I think that Paul is a very thoughtful and responsible leader, and he’s going through that process,” said Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.), one of Trump’s first supporters on Capitol Hill.

But a handful of other Republicans aren’t exhibiting the same kind of patience.

“To me, it’s pretty clear you have two choices”: Trump or Hillary Clinton, said Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-Idaho), who first backed Cruz but now supports Trump.

Ryan “could have handled it much better. He made a pledge to support the nominee a few months ago. He should have said, ‘I’m going to keep my pledge, but I still have some questions,’ ” Labrador told The Hill. “I think that would have been the right approach.”

Rep. Dennis Ross (R-Fla.), a Jeb Bush backer who is now on board with Trump, said he’s not expecting a Trump-Ryan “group hug” on Thursday. But he does want Ryan to move it along.

“I would like to see him get to yes sooner rather than later because we need to unify the party, and he holds the key to that,” Ross told The Hill.

In an interview on Fox News on Wednesday, Trump said it will be “great” if he makes some kind of deal with Congressional leaders. “And if we don’t, we will trudge forward like I’ve been doing and winning all the time,” he said.

The GOP’s internal strife was apparent at a House Republican conference meeting on Wednesday, sources in the room told NBC News. Six GOP House members openly expressed their frustrations with Ryan for his hesitancy to support Trump. Others said they now felt pressure to choose sides — Trump or Ryan.

Today will be the day they have to make that decision.

via http://ift.tt/1NrAkZj Tyler Durden

Deustche Bank Brokers Jailed After “Prolonged, Persistent Bad Behavior” In Biggest Insider Trading Bust Ever

Two former Deutsche Bank corporate brokers have been sentenced to one of the longest prison terms possible for the crime of insider trading in the UK. As US financial market participants walk free in the streets managing their own "home office" money, Martyn Dodgson and Andrew Hind will be rotting in a Wandsworth prison cell (among the worst reputed of England's prisons) for up to four and half years for what the judge called "persistent, prolonged and deliberately dishonest behavior." As Bloomberg reports, the group, including three other defendants, formed part of the FCA’s biggest insider-trading investigation dubbed Operation Tabernula.

The FCA accused Dodgson and Harrison of passing inside information on possible deals from their jobs between 2006 and 2010 to Hind who the agency claimed gave them to Parvizi and Anderson to trade on. All of the men denied the charge. But as Bloomberg reports, the sentences are among the longest handed down in an FCA insider-dealing case

Martyn Dodgson, 44, was sentenced Thursday in London (to 4 1/2 years in jail)  alongside friend and accountant Andrew Hind, who was given a 3 1/2 year prison term for the same offense. The men were found guilty of insider dealing on Monday after a four-month trial.

 

“This was persistent, prolonged and deliberately dishonest behavior,” Judge Jeffrey Pegden said when handing down the sentence. Dodgson showed a “gross breach of trust.”

 

The sentences were another victory for the Financial Conduct Authority, which has won 30 convictions for insider trading since it started prosecuting the crime less than a decade ago. The success comes as U.S. prosecutors are struggling with a court ruling that limits their ability to tackle the offense.

 

Three other defendants in the case, former Panmure Gordon & Co. corporate broker Andrew "Grant" Harrison and day traders Benjamin Anderson and Iraj Parvizi, were acquitted. They also used nicknames including Fatty, Nobu and Fruit in an effort to disguise their identities.

 

The group formed part of the FCA’s biggest insider-trading investigation dubbed Operation Tabernula. The FCA already secured three other convictions in relation to the probe.

 

The sentences are among the longest handed down in an FCA insider-dealing case. Former Moore Capital Management LLC trader Julian Rifat, another target in Tabernula, received a 19-month prison sentence last year after pleading guilty.

Finally, we note that, Dodgson and Hind will probably start their sentences in HM Prison Wandsworth, a Victorian jail south of the Thames known for its poor conditions and violent residents.

The City regulator heralded the case as proof it can hold rule-breakers to account…

“This was an extraordinary and complex case of a type not prosecuted in this country before,” said enforcement boss Mark Steward. “The message is loud and clear, that the FCA will not tolerate sophisticated predatory criminals abusing our markets. This case demonstrates our capability and determination to root out this kind of abuse and ensure our market and the investing public are properly protected.

 

“Dodgson was an experienced and well-paid banker, well aware that what he was doing constituted a criminal offence and who conspired with Hind to abuse our market and to profit at the expense of the investing public.

 

“The FCA is committed to detecting this kind of abuse and make the perpetrators fully accountable in accordance with the law.”

via http://ift.tt/220gQh0 Tyler Durden

Two More Energy Companies Go Bankrupt: Linn Energy, Penn Virgina File Chapter 11

According to data compiled by Haynes and Boone, in just the first four months of 2016 there had already been double the amount of bankrupt energy debt than in all of 2015, with the total secured and unsecured defaults rising to $34 billion, double the $17 billion total for all of 2015.

 

We can now add two more major names succumbing to the Saudi onslaught against marginal shale producers when overnightfirst Linn Energy announced a prepackaged Chapter 11 deal, followed by Penn Virginia defaulting just hours later.

In the first case, oil and gas producer Linn Energy LLC filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy after reaching a deal with lenders to restructure its $8.3 billion debt load and obtain $2.2 billion in fresh financing. In its bankruptcy filing press release, Linn announced that the holders of more than 66% of its credit facility have agreed to the “broad terms” of a debt restructuring but didn’t provide further details. The lenders also agreed to let Linn Energy spend the cash securing their debt, known as cash collateral, and to help fund a new $2.2 billion term loan.

LinnCo LLC, a publicly traded affiliate, filed for bankruptcy alongside Linn Energy Wednesday. LinnCo was created to help Linn Energy raise additional equity capital and is taxed as a corporation, rather than as a master limited partnership like Linn Energy.

For those wondering if the bankrtupcy would prevent the company from pumping more oil, bad news: Linn Energy said access to the cash will allow it to continue normal operations without lining up new bankruptcy financing. However, the company still requires permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Victoria, Texas, to begin spending.

Having obtained creditor consents in advance as part of the prepack, we assume that once the existing equity is wiped out, the company will reemerge with a far smaller debt load. However, a problem may emerge if its partnership status with LinnCo poses a problem for investors. As the WSJ writes, partnerships, as opposed to corporations, take advantage of a structure that allows companies to avoid paying corporate income taxes. Investors’ hunger for yield fueled a boom in these partnerships, which pay out their available cash to investors. Linn Energy led a revival of this status among companies pumping oil and gas and was once the largest energy producer operating as a partnership.

Such partnerships bankrolled the shale boom, buying up the older, more predictable fields that other drillers were trying to jettison to chase new prospects in flashier shale formations. But the partnerships had to keep buying new fields to keep their output—and cash distributions—growing. Many took on heavy debt loads to fund their acquisitions.

 

Even before the price of oil began to slide in 2014, some critics raised questions about whether these companies would be able to keep their promises of steady and growing payouts. An earlier wave of partnerships went bust in 1980s when commodity prices fell. But proponents of the structure argued that more sophisticated hedging markets would allow upstream MLPs to produce reliable streams of cash.

 

In an effort to stem the hit to investors, Linn Energy completed an exchange offer last month in which holders of Linn Energy units were given the chance to swap them for stock in LinnCo. Shares in both companies are likely to be wiped out now that they are in bankruptcy, but the swap could address the tax issue for investors.

 

Following the April exchange, Linn Energy launched a second, similar exchange offer that is set to expire May 23. In its bankruptcy announcement, Linn Energy said it is going to ask the bankruptcy court to allow unit holders to continue to swap Linn Energy units for LinnCo shares.

 

The strategy is largely untested and many are watching to see whether it proves successful for Linn Energy.

The Linn bankruptcy was not a surprise: the company warned in March that a bankruptcy filing may be “unavoidable,” and said last month that it reached a settlement with bondholders on a restructuring that could take place through a chapter 11 reorganization.

* * *

In the day’s second bankruptcy, energy producer Penn Virginia also filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection Thursday.  And just like Linn, the Pennsylvania-based explorer and producer deals said it had reached a prepackaged agreement with holders of 87%, or $1.03 billion, of its total funded-debt obligations to restructure under chapter 11 protection and eliminate long-term debt by more than $1 billion.

Penn Virginia said it expects to emerge from chapter 11 by the end of the summer.

Penn Virginia’s history dates back to 1882 with its founding as a coal concern in Virginia. It shifted to oil and gas in the 1980s, and more recently has pared its natural-gas holdings in favor of oil fields.

“Like many other exploration and production companies, Penn Virginia has been significantly affected by the recent and continued dramatic decline in oil and natural gas prices,” Interim Chief Executive Edward Cloues said. “We believe using the chapter 11 process is the most efficient way to achieve our financial objectives and deleverage the Company’s balance sheet.”

As a result, now that two more energy companies are about to see their interest expense slashed drastically going forward, the only real impact on the company will be that their all in production costs will decline substantially, allowing both to pump more oil at even lower prices, and thus adding to the global supply imbalance, something that will infuriate Saudi Arabia and add even more output to a market that remains chronically oversupplied.

via http://ift.tt/1sgK2V3 Tyler Durden

Surging North American Silver Investment Pushes Domestic Supply Deficit To New Record

srsrocco icon

By the SRSrocco Report,

North American silver investment via its domestic supply suffered another large deficit in 2015.  How big was the deficit?  It was huge, surging 70% compared to 2014… and this only includes silver investment from two Official coin sales.

Let me explain.  We need to start off by showing the total Canadian Silver Maple Leaf sales for 2015.   The Royal Canadian Mint finally published their 2015 Annual Report in which they stated that sales of Silver Maples jumped 18% from 29.2 million (Moz) in 2014 to 34.3 Moz in 2015:

Canadian Silver Maple Leaf Sales

Sales of Canadian Silver Maples started off strong in Q1 2015, but declined in Q2 2015 by falling 400,000 oz compared to the same period in 2014 (7.2 Moz Q2 2014 vs 6.8 Moz Q2 2015).  However, things turned around significantly in the Q3 and Q4 2015 during the silver retail investment shortage (July-Oct).

Sales of Silver Maples were a record 18.6 Moz in the second half of 2015 versus 13.8 Moz in the second half of 2014.  If we add Canadian Silver Maple Leaf sales to U.S. Mint Silver Eagles for 2015, it jumped to a stunning 81.3 Moz compared to 73.2 Moz in 2014.

I discussed this in my THE SILVER CHART REPORT which was released in June 2015.  Here is CHART #37 of a total of 48 charts in the report:

U.S. & Canada Silver Production vs Maple & Eagle Sales

As we can see, combined U.S. and Canadian domestic silver production was 96.6 Moz in 2001 while total Silver Maple & Eagle sales were only 9.2 Moz.  Thus, the total Silver Maple & Eagle sales only accounted for 9% of the two countries silver mine supply.  This trend started to change significantly in 2008 as Silver Maple & Eagle sales consumed nearly half of U.S. and Canadian silver mine supply.

However, this trend turned into a deficit 2011 as Silver Maple & Eagle sales were 9.4 Moz higher than domestic silver mine supply (63.1 Moz Official Coins vs 53.7 Moz supply).  Even though Silver Maple & Eagle sales declined in 2012, the net investment supply deficit resumed again in 2013 and 2014.  Matter-a-fact, Silver Maple & Eagle sales were nearly 20 Moz more than U.S. and Canadian domestic silver mine supply in 2014.

Surging North American Silver Investment Pushes Domestic Supply Deficit To New Record In 2015

Well, if you think 2014 was a banner year for the silver investment domestic supply deficit, take a look at my updated chart including the data for 2015:

2015 chart above

Here we can see that total Silver Maples & Eagles of 81.3 Moz is 33.7 Moz more than domestic silver mine supply of 47.6 Moz from the U.S. and Canada.  Moreover, this only includes the manufacture of these two Official Silver Coins.  This does not include the estimated 40-50 Moz of private rounds and bars now including in the 2016 World Silver Survey.

What a difference since 2001… AYE?  Total Silver Maple & Eagle sales in 2001 were less than 10% of U.S. and Canadian Mine supply.  Thus, these two countries had plenty of silver to supply their investment needs that year.  However, the U.S. and Canada had to import 33.7 Moz in 2015 just to produce these two Official Silver coins.

While the U.S. and Canada can continue to import enough silver to meet its current needs, this may not be true in the future.

Lastly, if you haven’t checked out our new PRECIOUS METALS INVESTING page, I highly recommend you do.

Check back for new articles and updates at the SRSrocco Report

via http://ift.tt/1T8gP51 SRSrocco

Surging North American Silver Investment Pushes Domestic Supply Deficit To New Record

srsrocco icon

By the SRSrocco Report,

North American silver investment via its domestic supply suffered another large deficit in 2015.  How big was the deficit?  It was huge, surging 70% compared to 2014… and this only includes silver investment from two Official coin sales.

Let me explain.  We need to start off by showing the total Canadian Silver Maple Leaf sales for 2015.   The Royal Canadian Mint finally published their 2015 Annual Report in which they stated that sales of Silver Maples jumped 18% from 29.2 million (Moz) in 2014 to 34.3 Moz in 2015:

Canadian Silver Maple Leaf Sales

Sales of Canadian Silver Maples started off strong in Q1 2015, but declined in Q2 2015 by falling 400,000 oz compared to the same period in 2014 (7.2 Moz Q2 2014 vs 6.8 Moz Q2 2015).  However, things turned around significantly in the Q3 and Q4 2015 during the silver retail investment shortage (July-Oct).

Sales of Silver Maples were a record 18.6 Moz in the second half of 2015 versus 13.8 Moz in the second half of 2014.  If we add Canadian Silver Maple Leaf sales to U.S. Mint Silver Eagles for 2015, it jumped to a stunning 81.3 Moz compared to 73.2 Moz in 2014.

I discussed this in my THE SILVER CHART REPORT which was released in June 2015.  Here is CHART #37 of a total of 48 charts in the report:

U.S. & Canada Silver Production vs Maple & Eagle Sales

As we can see, combined U.S. and Canadian domestic silver production was 96.6 Moz in 2001 while total Silver Maple & Eagle sales were only 9.2 Moz.  Thus, the total Silver Maple & Eagle sales only accounted for 9% of the two countries silver mine supply.  This trend started to change significantly in 2008 as Silver Maple & Eagle sales consumed nearly half of U.S. and Canadian silver mine supply.

However, this trend turned into a deficit 2011 as Silver Maple & Eagle sales were 9.4 Moz higher than domestic silver mine supply (63.1 Moz Official Coins vs 53.7 Moz supply).  Even though Silver Maple & Eagle sales declined in 2012, the net investment supply deficit resumed again in 2013 and 2014.  Matter-a-fact, Silver Maple & Eagle sales were nearly 20 Moz more than U.S. and Canadian domestic silver mine supply in 2014.

Surging North American Silver Investment Pushes Domestic Supply Deficit To New Record In 2015

Well, if you think 2014 was a banner year for the silver investment domestic supply deficit, take a look at my updated chart including the data for 2015:

2015 chart above

Here we can see that total Silver Maples & Eagles of 81.3 Moz is 33.7 Moz more than domestic silver mine supply of 47.6 Moz from the U.S. and Canada.  Moreover, this only includes the manufacture of these two Official Silver Coins.  This does not include the estimated 40-50 Moz of private rounds and bars now including in the 2016 World Silver Survey.

What a difference since 2001… AYE?  Total Silver Maple & Eagle sales in 2001 were less than 10% of U.S. and Canadian Mine supply.  Thus, these two countries had plenty of silver to supply their investment needs that year.  However, the U.S. and Canada had to import 33.7 Moz in 2015 just to produce these two Official Silver coins.

While the U.S. and Canada can continue to import enough silver to meet its current needs, this may not be true in the future.

Lastly, if you haven’t checked out our new PRECIOUS METALS INVESTING page, I highly recommend you do.

Check back for new articles and updates at the SRSrocco Report

via http://ift.tt/1UVvMMc SRSrocco

US Import Prices Tumble For 21 Months In A Row As China Exports Most Deflation Since 2009

For a near record 21 months in a row, US Import Prices dropped in April compared to last year (down a worse than expected 5.7% YoY, and rising only 0.3%, less than the 0.6% expected rebound from March) with China exporting deflation at the fastest pace since 2009.

 

Looking at the breakdown, while a major culprit for the collapse in imported deflation remains sliding energy prices, it wasn’t the only reason for the slowdown as imports ex-fuel and food fell a notable 2% Y/Y in April. Additionally, industrial supplies prices rose 1.5% after rising 2.7% in March; capital goods prices fell 0.1% after falling 0.1% in March; consumer goods prices fell 0.3% after falling 0.3% in March.

As for the biggest culprit, it remains a well-known one: China. Acording to the BLS, China’s import price index dropped again, sliding from 101.4 to 101.3, the lowest print since 2010…

 

… while the annual rate of change was a -1.9%, the biggest decline since 2009.

For all the bluster about Chinese inflation picking up, it appears it is mostly in pork and domestic commodity prices. The prices of everything else continues to drop.

via http://ift.tt/1s0s9sO Tyler Durden