Halliburton Fires One Third Of Global Staff: “What We Are Experiencing Today Is Unsustainable”

In a brutally frank and painfully honest first quarter operational update, Halliburton president Jeff Miller poured freezing cold water all over the “oil is stabilizing, and everything is going to be awesome” narrative. After explaining that the firm has laid off one-third of its global employees, and pointing to the collapse in sequential revenues across every business unit, Miller exclaimed: “What we are experiencing today is far beyond headwinds; it is
unsustainable.”

Due to the deadline of its merger agreement with Baker Hughes Halliburtion has delayed its earnings conference call until May 3rd and so gave an operational update. The healdlines were horrific:

  • *HAL SEES OVER 30% DROP IN YR GLOBAL DRILLING, COMPLETION SPEND
  • *HALLIBURTON CUT ABOUT 1/3 OF STAFF GLOBALLY
  • *HALLIBURTON CUT OVER 6,000 JOBS DURING 1Q
  • *HALLIBURTON SEES ADDITIONAL 50% DECLINE IN NORTH AMERICA SPEND ’16
  • *HALLIBURTON SAYS WORLDWIDE RIG COUNT LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1999
  • *HALLIBURTON SEES PRODUCTION DECLINES IN BACK HALF OF ’16

Dave Lesar, Chairman and CEO, began the dismal update…

Life has changed in the energy industry, especially in North America, and over the past several quarters we have taken the steps to adapt to that fact.

Operators globally are under immense pressure, and many of our North America customers are fighting to maintain some value for their shareholders. Our goal is to work with those customers to get through these tough times.

Our customers have taken defensive actions to solidify their finances including significant reductions to headcount and capital spend. While these were necessary actions, it clearly will result in production declines in the back half of 2016. But even when operators feel better about the markets, they will still face issues of balance sheet repair and we believe they will be cautious in adding rigs back.”

And then President Jeff Miller unloaded…

“In North America, the industry experienced another tough quarter with the average U.S. rig count down 27% sequentially. By comparison, our revenue was down 17%, outperforming our peer group, and our completions activity was only down single digits sequentially, demonstrating our clients’ continued flight to quality.

 

What we are experiencing today is far beyond headwinds; it is unsustainable. My definition of an unsustainable market is one where all service companies are losing money in North America, which is where we are now.

 

However, our margins have continued to show resilience despite the aggressive activity and pricing declines we have seen since the peak, with decremental margins of only 22% for the quarter.”

But apart from that, he stuck to the narrative that is now becoming standard – that H2 will see some ‘stability’…

From the peak in the fourth quarter of 2014, the U.S. rig count has declined almost 80%, setting a new record low. By comparison, our North America revenue is down 62% over the same period, again outperforming our peers, and operating income has only now slipped to a quarterly loss position. The second quarter average land rig count is already down more than 20% sequentially, and setting new record lows every week. Nevertheless, we believe we will see the landing point for the U.S. rig count during the second quarter.

 

 

 

Once we see stability in the rig count, our cost cutting measures will start to catch up. Previous downturns indicate that there is typically at least a one quarter lag after the rig count flattens before we see our margins begin to improve.

via http://ift.tt/1SzKTsa Tyler Durden

The Volkswagen Car “Buy Back” Just Unleashed Havoc On The U.S. Car Market

When it comes to the US manufacturing sector which as a result of the oil sector collapse recently entered a recession, for years it was the US auto industry which was presented as a shining example of how “things can go right” and how US manufacturing workers have benefited when year after year domestic auto production rose and recently hit a record high annualized production rate.

But while recently there has been a rather steep decline in new car sales  (as a result of soaring inventories and shrinking credit) the real canary in the coalmine when it comes to consumer end demand for cars emerged in recent months when used-car prices began to leak lower slowly at first, and then very fast. In fact, as we showed recently, used-car-prices are plunging at a pace comparable to 2008, as a result of what is a record glut of used cars sitting on dealer lots, unable to find a willing buyer.

 

It all culminated with a recent RBC research report in which it asked if this is “the card that brings the whole house down” because, it added, “the reason for concern is lower used vehicle prices have a potential spillover effect to many other industry factors. If we think about volume, price, mix, credit – all have been incredibly positive and supportive of the recovery. All are also no doubt related, but that’s what makes it a bit scary.”

* * *

Fast forward to today when Volkswagen took a massive $18.28 billion charge related to the emissions-cheating scandal, forcing it to slash its 2015 dividends and post a deep loss. The largest German company announced earlier today a net loss of €1.58 billion for 2015, compared with a net profit of €10.85 billion a year earlier. The company posted an operating loss of €4.1 billion for the year.

For the current year, Volkswagen said group revenue would fall as much as 5% partly because of the emissions issue, though overall deliveries should be around the level of 2015. It expects a “sharp decline” in passenger car revenue, the company said, which is to be expected for a company that has blown through years of goodwill with one silly emissions-rigging scandal. 

But much more important than VOW’s financial results, was that as part of the company’s settlement in the U.S., it agreed to offer U.S. owners of nearly 500,000 vehicles a blend of car buybacks, repairs and compensation.

Specifically, Volkswagen has pledged to give drivers of about 480,000 2-liter diesel vehicles the option of selling the cars back to Volkswagen, or having them modified to meet emissions standards, the judge said. Those with a lease can cancel it and return the vehicle to Volkswagen. Consumers also will get “substantial compensation” on top of that, according to Judge Charles Breyer, overseeing the lawsuit against the German car-maker, who has pressured Volkswagen since February to produce a fix for the cars. He made it clear last month that if no solution was offered by this week, he would consider a request by the plaintiffs to set a summer trial the WSJ reported.

Needless to say, given the option of a hassle-free buyback leading to cash in hand, or waste weeks in some dealership, everyone will pick the former.

* * *

Which take us back to the original point: the near record glut of used cars.

Because the immediate result of Volkswagen’s settlement to placate buyers following its emissions-testing scandal, could send a shock wave across the US auto industry.

As Market Talk correctly notes, offering hundreds of thousands of buyers a chance to sell back their old VW or end their lease early (in lieu of fixing the car) will almost certainly flood the used-car market that is already on pace to hit record inventory levels in 2016.

Once the German auto maker fixes the emissions problems on those cars, it will put them back into circulation, and the the availability of repaired models will add even further pricing pressure on used-car prices “that are sagging amid a glut of gently-used vehicles being turned in after leases or as trade-ins for new car purchases.”

* * *

Volkswagen may be just the tip of the iceberg.

Following the recently disclosed scandal at Mitsubishi, the Japanese Transport Minister Keiichi Ishii said on Friday he wanted Mitsubishi Motors Corp to respond “with integrity” after revelations that it cheated on test to measure fuel economy, including by possibly buying back the cars in question, Kyodo news reported.

In other words, even more buybacks, even more fixes and even more used cars about to push the record used-car glut to never before seen levels. How long until car dealers, stick with hundreds of thousands of used cars, are forced to start dumping.

RBC may have been premature with its observation of the “card that brings the whole house down“, but what happens when there is suddenly a whole lot of cards?

via http://ift.tt/1Vr4P3V Tyler Durden

The Stunning Chart Showing Where All The Commodity Gains Have Come From

“The market is moving so quickly, yesterday felt just like the stock market in June last year before the crash,” warns one Asian trader reflecting on the chaotic rush of Chinese speculators into the industrial metals commodities market Echoing the frenzy that fueled China’s parabolic stock market rise (and subsequent collapse), Bloomberg notes one local China broker admits “we’ve seen a lot of people opening accounts for commodities futures recently,” adding rather ominously, “the great ball of China money is moving away from bonds and stocks to commodities.” The spikes in everything from rebar to iron ore, however, according to Goldman “is not driven by a sustainable shift in fundamentals.”

Industrial metals up over 50% year-to-date, amid plunging exports and domestic zombie revival

 

Since Dec 23rd 2015 when the US imposed a 256% tariff on Chinese steel imports, composite steel prices have soared almost 50% even as exports have slipped…

 

Trading in futures on everything from steel reinforcement bars and hot-rolled coils to cotton and polyvinyl chloride has soared this week, prompting exchanges in Shanghai, Dalian and Zhengzhou to boost fees or issue warnings to investors.

Deutsche Bank details the total crazinesss…

The onshore China commodity markets this week traded (conservatively) $350bn notional, a 17x increase on the $20bn notional that traded on Feb 1st 2016 i.e. a month ago (is it coincidence that the notional is about the same as at the peak of the equity frenzy?).

 

My calculations are pretty basic; I’ve trawled the screens and chosen 32 commodities in agri, metals and coke/coal and done a quick (contracts x value)/CNY for a dollar amount. I have not used the largest day’s volume either (e.g. Deformed Bar, RBTA has traded close to $100bn, but I used closer to $60bn). Cotton (VVA Comdty) has been trading $15bn, up from $500mm in Feb. In the US, the long established cotton contract (CT1 Comdty) trades $600mm. China listed Sugar (CBA Comdty) has traded $14bn versus the US listed sugar beet at $850mm.

What this looks like!!

 

How much impact is this having on global markets? At first, very little. Many of the China listed futures started to bottom and rally in Nov and Dec last year, with very little relationship to global peers. This very crude chart below is a simple aggregation of all the prices of the 32 commods that I could find, but many of the underlying constituents are exactly the same. The performance looks inversely correlated with the performance of the underlying economy (and demand) but nicely related to the injection of credit.

In recent sessions, some of the US based commods have started to squeeze higher, presumably because the dog and the tail are changing places (clearly these are not apples-for-apples, as it were, in terms of contracts).

There is no correlation between the explosion in interest in Chinese commodity futures and any Chinese economic activity (and it should be a reminder to all who gaze lovingly at the commodity charts of the last decade that credit, rather than true demand, can be the most influential factor in financial markets). Volumes have increased 17 fold in a month. The economy has not. This is simply another speculative excess that will probably (already has) run way beyond fundamentals. It is probably creating a false picture of global demand for commodity stocks of all types, which themselves have rallied far beyond their earnings potential.

Eventually, the excesses will need to be curbed and maybe that starts a new phase of risk-off within China. As Bloomberg reports,

While the underlying products may be anything but glamorous, the numbers are eye-popping: contracts on more than 223 million metric tons of rebar changed hands on Thursday, more than China’s full-year production of the material used to strengthen concrete.

 

The frenzy echoes the activity that fueled China’s stock market last year before a rout erased $5 trillion, and follows earlier bubbles in property to garlic and even certain types of tea. China’s army of investors is honing in on raw materials amid signs of a pickup in demand and as the nation’s equities fall the most among global markets and corporate bond yields head for the steepest monthly rise in more than a year.

 

Hao Hong, chief China strategist at Bocom International Holdings Co. in Hong Kong, says the improvement in fundamentals and the availability of leverage to bet on commodities is making them irresistible to traders.

 

“These guys are going nuts,” Hong said. “Leverage exaggerates the move of the way up, but also on the way down – much like what margin financing did to stocks in 2015.”

To cool activity, as we warned yesterrday, the Shanghai Futures Exchange increased transaction fees while the Dalian Commodity Exchange raised iron ore margin requirements. The bourse in Dalian also tightened rules on what it called abnormal trading, which now includes frequent submission and withdrawal of orders and self-trading. The Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange urged prudent investment on cotton futures amid “relatively large price fluctuations.”

“There’s a lot of liquidity and there are people looking for opportunity,” said Ben Kwong, a director at brokerage KGI Asia Ltd. in  Hong Kong. “Investors are just boosted by recent rebound in those commodity prices and it’s speculative behavior.

Goldman agrees, warning that “we believe that it is not yet driven by a sustainable shift in fundamentals…”

The sentiment in commodity markets has clearly shifted towards being more bullish. With steel rebar leading the charge following robust Chinese credit data and oil trading to the top end of our inflection phase trading range of $45/$25 , this leaves the most important question of whether this is the beginning of a sustainable, broad-based commodity rally that marks the end of the inflection phase. While this recent rally has the potential to run further to the upside, with the biggest risk that the Fed chooses not to hike in the coming months despite improving Chinese activity, we believe that it is not yet driven by a sustainable shift in fundamentals. In oil, we do not anticipate a sustainable shift in fundamentals until 3Q16, which creates near-term downside risks. Specifically:

 

1) The rally has been far stronger in the oil and steel complexes, commodity sectors that have seen near-term, transient, supply adjustments. While these adjustments deal with near-term surpluses through oil supply disruptions and excessive de-stocking in ferrous complex (see Exhibit 2), they do not address the longer-term supply problems of excess capacity in the oil and metals sectors, in our view. Specifically, we believe the current decline in US oil production is still insufficient to offset low-cost supply growth such as Iran, particularly should disruptions in Iraq, Nigeria and Venezuela reverse.

 

 

2) The steel complex also benefits from a high level of exposure to the credit-led pick up in Chinese infrastructure activity, which was put in place by Chinese policy makers to contain fears over systemic risks earlier this year that have passed. Outside of commodity demand exposed to Chinese infrastructure, actual demand for commodities didn’t change that much over this time period, only expectations behaved in a V-shaped manner, declining and rebounding.

 

3) The reflationary pressures from 1) and 2) were reinforced by the macro backdrop of a more dovish Fed worried about Chinese growth and commodity producers which weakened the US dollar and reinforced a stronger China and higher commodity prices. With the global economy on more solid footing, we believe the risks are that these reflationary ‘macro’ stimuli from a more dovish Fed and China are reversed in coming months (potentially flagged by the Fed as soon as next week’s FOMC meeting).

 

However, we acknowledge that the larger-than-expected China stimulus could support steel intensive infrastructure developments through the remainder of the second quarter. Further, in our view, the rise in prices engenders the risk of a premature supply response, particularly in steel, aluminum and zinc where Chinese margins have improved materially.

 

In base metals, we do not believe we have seen the lows yet in this cycle.

We leave it to Tiger Shi, a managing partner at Bands Financial Ltd in Hong Kong to conclude:

“The market is moving so quickly, yesterday felt just like the stock market in June last year before the crash… I think how it goes up, that’s how it will come down.”

Trade accordingly.

via http://ift.tt/22UnwMm Tyler Durden

Weekend Reading: It’s Probably A Trap

Submitted by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Earlier this week, I noted that due to the technical breakout of the market above the downtrend line from last May, an increase in exposure to equity risk was required. To wit:

“With the breakout of the market yesterday, and given that ‘short-term buy signals’ are in place I began adding exposure back into portfolios. This is probably the most difficult ‘buy’ I can ever remember making.

 

As I stated, buying this breakout goes against virtually everything in my bones as the fundamental underpinnings certainly doesn’t support taking on equity risk here.

  • We are moving into the seasonally weak time of year.
  • Economic data continues to remain weak
  • Earnings are only positive by not sucking as bad as estimates
  • Volume is weak
  • Longer-term technical underpinnings remain bearish.
  • It is the summer of a Presidential election year which tends to be weak.
  • The yield curve is flattening
  • Bonds aren’t “buying” the rally

While I am increasing exposure here, I do suspect that price volatility has not been eliminated entirely which is why I remain cautious. 

Furthermore, the “bullish case” is currently built primarily on “hope.”

  • Hope the economy will improve in the second half of the year.
  • Hope that earnings will improve in the second half of the year.
  • Hope that oil prices will trade higher even as supply remains elevated.
  • Hope the Fed will not raise interest rates this year.
  • Hope that global Central Banks will “keep on keepin’ on.” 
  • Hope that the US Dollar doesn’t rise
  • Hope that interest rates remain low.
  • Hope that high-yield credit markets remain stable

I am sure I forgot a few things, but you get the point. With valuations expensive, markets overbought, volatility low, and sentiment pushing back into more extreme territory, there are a lot of things that can go wrong. 

In other words, it’s probably a trap.

I highly suspect that within the next week, or so, I will be stopped out of recent positions. That is the risk of managing money.

However, given the ongoing Central Bank interventions, verbal easing by the Federal Reserve and an excessiveness of “bullish hope,” it is likely that prices could indeed more higher in the short-term.

As John Maynard Keynes once famously quipped:

“The markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” 

This weekend’s reading is the usual series of opposing views to reduce the inherent confirmation bias that exists by remaining too bullish and bearish. An honest assessment of the risks and rewards will always lead to better long-term outcomes. 


CENTRAL BANKING


THE MARKET – BULL vs BEAR


ECONOMY & OIL 


MUST READS


“Risk taking is necessary for large success, but it also necessary for failure.” – Nasim Taleb

via http://ift.tt/1SVUfeI Tyler Durden

US Stocks Hold Doha-Dud Gains As US Macro Crashes Most In 14 Months

How we suspect a few USDJPY traders (who are the most net long JPY on record) feel this evening…

After JPY’s biggest daily plunge against the USD since October 2014’s cluster of Central Bank efforts…

 

This week was the worst for US Macro data since Feb 2015…

 

This has pushed US macro data down to 2-month lows… the last time this happened, things ended badly for stocks…

 

The “W”-shaped recovery analog remains…

 

An odd day today as the shitty MSFT, GOOG earnings were largely ignored by everything other than Nasdaq…

 

Notably stocks did not get their usual boost from USDJPY’s surge…

 

Which left Nasdaq the only loser on the week – while Trannies and Small Caps were squeeze today back into the lead…

 

This is what it took to keep Dow 18,000 today – a 0.4vol point plung ein VIX!!

 

FANGs had their worst week in 2 months… (down 3 weeks in a row)

 

Spot the outlier in this week’s FX market (as The USD Index rose 0.5% or so on the week, rallying from midweek)…

 

Treasury yields rose all week, with no inflection like FX markets (though Wednesday saw the biggest damage done)… 2s30s steepened 5bps on the week

 

 

Gold ended the week practically unchanged but Silver, Crude, and Copper all surged an oddly similar 5% or so on the week…

 

After Crude started the week down almost 7%…

 

Silver outperformed Gold for the 2nd week – smashing the Gold/Silver ration down 10% in 2 weeks to its lowest since June 2015…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

via http://ift.tt/248R4sj Tyler Durden

Illegal Immigration Soars 130% At Southern U.S. Border

New Border Patrol statistics show that 32,117 family units and 27,754 unaccompanied children have been apprehended trying to come across the Southern border and into the United States this year through March. While both numbers are concerning, as both are up y/y, it’s noteworthy that the number of families that are trying to get across the border is up a staggering 131% in the first three months of 2016 compared to the same period one year ago.

 

As the Washington Times adds, as Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson added more manpower to the border two years ago, the number trying to cross the border did tick down from late 2015 and early 2015. However, as can be seen from the table above, as new relaxed rules for detaining illegal immigrants were announced last summer, the pace of attempts at crossing the border picked up significantly.

These are statistics that we’re sure The Donald will pick up and run with immediately, as its one of the key policy pieces that he is running on for President.

via http://ift.tt/1T40nBW Tyler Durden

Lithium Stocks Soar After “Epic Launch” Of Tesla Model 3

Shares of Lithium companies have surged after Tesla boosted its outlook for electric vehicles powered by batteries that use the element, sending the Solactive Global Lithium Index up by about a third since the middle of February.

 

And it does not look set to slowdown, as OilPrice.com’s James Stafford notes, the unveiling of Tesla’s Model 3 electric car was no less than the lifting of the final curtain on a game-changing energy revolution. And if we follow that revolution to its core, we arrive at lithium – our new gasoline for which the feeding frenzy has only just begun.

Unveiled just on 31 March and already with 325,000 orders, it seems that the market, too, understands that the Model 3 is more than just another electric vehicle. In one week alone, Tesla has racked up around $14 billion in implied future sales, making it the “biggest one-week launch of any product ever.” (And if you think the “implied future sales” negates the news, think again: Each order requires a $1,000 refundable deposit.)

It will change the world because it is the first hard indication that the tech-driven energy revolution is not only pending, it’s arrived. The Model 3 and its stunning one-week sales success—apparently achieved without advertising or paid endorsements–brings the electric car definitively into the mainstream, and there is no turning back now. Competitors will step up their game and the electric vehicle rush will be in full throttle—so will the war to stake out new lithium deposits.

If we reverse engineer the Model 3, we find lithium–the heart and soul of the energy revolution. While everything else is suffering from low prices and a supply glut, lithium is facing the over-charged demand, which opens a huge window of opportunity for new producers.

The Model 3, all by itself, will have a huge impact on lithium demand, which is already threatening to make supply impossible without exploration and production of new resources. At the end of the day, Tesla’s “huge step towards a better future” achieved by fast-tracking “the transition to sustainable transportation” comes down to lithium.

The lithium space is becoming a frantic game of who can get their hands on the choicest new mining acreage and who can launch new production fastest. And in North America, it’s all going down in the state of Nevada, which is the staging ground for a U.S. lithium boom that will feed the manufacturing beasts for everything from EVs, battery gigafactories, powerwalls and energy storage solutions to the long and growing list of consumer electronics that we use every day.

It is no less than a global scramble to secure new lithium supplies. Even before Tesla unveiled the Model 3 to smashing success, Goldman Sachs was predicting that for every 1% rise in EV market share, lithium demand would rise by 70,000 tons per year, and that overall, the lithium market could triple in size by 2025 just on the back of electric vehicles.

To ensure the success of its electric vehicles, Tesla is building a battery gigafactory just outside of Reno, Nevada, and it’s hoping to have enough lithium to make enough batteries to power 500,000 cars by 2020, according to Fortune magazine. Logically, it’s hoping to be able to source that lithium from Nevada as well, and all the new entrants into the lithium space are hungry to be put on Tesla’s future supplier list. But first they have to get it out of the ground.

All of this has made a previously dusty and unattractive area of Nevada—Clayton Valley—one of the most important and significant places in America. But Clayton Valley may just be the beginning.

According to Malcolm Bell, advisory board member and head of acquisitions for Nevada Energy Metals, Nevada may have a lot of fault traps outside of Clayton Valley with potential lithium deposits “hiding in plain sight”.

“The lithium business is not a flash in the plan; it is here to stay, and I am looking at it like the start of the oil boom in the U.S. when there were oil rigs and derricks nearly every 50 feet,” industry veteran Bell told Oilprice.com. And Nevada Energy Metals understands that lithium is exactly the mineral that is powering our future.

“Thanks to visionaries like Elon Musk, who has turned the transportation industry on its ear, we have a new commodity that looks like it is here to stay. I feel that a lot of people underestimate the green energy movement and the role that Lithium plays in it.”

The electric car is no longer elite. Now it’s for the masses, and the masses will need more lithium than we can currently get our hands on. It’s a wide-scale energy revolution that will end being—in hindsight—the first nail in the coffin for fossil fuels and the heralding of a new era of lithium, the “white petroleum”.

via http://ift.tt/1XNfPX2 Tyler Durden

IEA Warns “Saudis Russians To Pump As Much Oil As Possible”

While the IEA has been urgently pushing an agenda of the oil market “rebalancing” in coming months in order to validate rising oil prices, the reality is that there are two parts to the equation: demand and supply. We will have to say more on demand shortly, because as it turns out most of it may have come from none other than China where commodities are merely the latest speculative bubble while China has been furiously stockpiling oil in what is merely pulling future demand to the present, however on the far more important supply side, where the key variable has become shale production over the coming year, earlier today the head of the Oil Industry and Markets Division at the International Energy Agency, Neil Atkinson, told CNBC that he believed both producers will continue to “pump as much oil as possible.”

This is what he said:

“In the post-Doha world, when we’re still in what is essentially a free market for oil, the Russians will pump as much oil out as the market will absorb and the Saudis have said much the same thing.”

Which incidentally is also what we have been saying for weeks heading into Doha, a meeting which was doomed from the beginning and which saw record oil supply from not only Russia but also Iraq in the last few weeks. This record production is set to continue.

Neil Atkinson painted an even bleaker picture saying that “we’re back to where we were before Doha where people produce what they can, sell what they can for whatever price they can achieve and the market takes care of the surpluses in time.”

Atkinson added something else known to regular ZH readers, namely that “as far as the Russians are concerned, even in the run-up to Doha when they were going to be party to an agreement to freeze production, they were actually pumping up production anyway.”

The IEA staffer noted that Saudi Arabia had spare production capacity (of up to 2 million barrels a day) as well a couple of other Middle Eastern producers such as Kuwait and the UAE but that “apart from that there is no spare production capacity essentially anywhere in the world.”

Of course, the IEA could not leave it on a sour note and concluded that he believes that oil markets would come close to a balance in the second half of 2016 with U.S. shale oil production expected to fall further this year. However, he said there was a possibility that the U.S. could ramp up production easily again in future. “In our numbers, the U.S. by itself is going to shed something like 450,000 to 500,000 barrels a day in 2016 versus 2015,” Atkinson said, “it’s coming down before our very eyes.”

Maybe it is, but as we also wrote a month ago, as a result of not only newly reset hedges at prices which are now close to breakeven but also due to the reactivation of DUCs, or drilled but uncompleted wells, “U.S. Production Is Coming Back On Line.”

As Reuters admitted previously, “a dreaded scenario for U.S. oil bulls might just be becoming a reality” as some U.S. shale oil producers, including Oasis Petroleum and Pioneer Natural Resources Co, are activating drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs) in a reversal in strategy that threatens to bring more crude to a saturated market and dampen any sustained rebound in prices.

Ultimately it will boil down to one simple thing: is the world’s oil storage, which is rapidly approaching operational capacity in the case of Cushing and other U.S. PADD regions, and also includes over a hundred million barrels of oil held in offshore tankers, provide enough of a buffer to offset the pick up in global demand, which has yet to materialize, or will the collapsing contango force the oil held offshore to be unloaded and flood the world with all those barrels which will force wholesale dumping and liquidation.

And finally, as we were concluding this post, the following news hit the tape:

  • Libya’s eastern govt’s first oil shipment of 650k bbl crude from Messla and Sarir oilfields to leave tomorrow for Malta on tanker Distya Ameya from Hariga, Libya, National Oil Corp. chief Nagi Elmagrabi says in stmt.

Finally, keep in mind that the current oil rally is – at least so far – a replica of what happened in the summer of 2015 when oil soared for several months only to tumble to fresh lows at the end of the year. The driving catalyst back then was China. And, as we will shortly show, China will be the negative catalyst once again.

The complete interview with Atkinson below:

via http://ift.tt/1WKZqEg Tyler Durden

The SPV Loophole: Draghi Just Unleashed “QE For The Entire World”… And May Have Bailed Out US Shale

Almost exactly one year ago, we wrote “Mario Draghi, Collateral Scarcity, And Why The ECB Will Soon Buy Corporate Bonds.” 11 months later, the ECB confirmed this when for the first time ever, Mario Draghi said he would do purchase corporate bonds when he launched the ECB’s Corporate Sector Purchase Programme (CSPP), confirming that with government bond collateral evaporating and the liquidity situation getting precariously dangerous and forcing moments of historic volatility (as in the April/May 2015 Bund fiasco), he had run out of other options.

And while we have been covering this key development closely since its announcement more than a month ago, we were surprised by how little attention most of the sellside was paying to what is clearly a watershed moment in capital markets as a central banks now openly backstops corporate bond issuance (among other things pointing out a month ago Why The ECB Will Be Forced To Buy Junk Bonds Next). Ironically, the market was fully aware of what the ECB’s action meant as we showed in the “The ECB Effect: European Telecom Issues Largest Ever Junk Bond After More Than 100% Upsizing.”

Now, following the release of the full details of its corporate bond buying program, analysts are once again keenly focused on hits program who impact will be dramatic over the coming years.

First, as a reminder, here are the big picture details:

  • May buy in primary and secondary markets
  • Issue share limit of 70% per ISIN
  • Inclusion of bonds issued by insurance companies
  • Can buy bonds of companies incorporated in the euro area whose ultimate parent is not based in the euro area
  • Remaining maturity of 6 months and maximum of 30Y

What does this mean?  Deutsche Bank did a quick run through of the details:

As a quick summary assuming most have seen the details, some of the interesting or most notable points were as follows: The inclusion of non-bank financial institutions; The Eurosystem collateral framework as a basis for determining the eligibility (Non euro-area parent company bonds could be included); The Bank will be active in both the primary and secondary market; Minimum rating of BBB-; Maturity between 6 months and 30 years; Issue share limit size of 70%. It was also confirmed that the purchases will not be conducted by a third party and rather by six national central banks and are due to commence in June. 

 

So what are our thoughts? Well overall the technical parameters of the programme have exceeded our expectations in terms of the resulting size of the eligible universe. In particular this includes the criteria around incorporation, minimum rating, maturity and lack of minimum size of bond issue. As a result, the ECB should be able to do more than we previously expected, provided it is willing to. Our reading of the announcement is that they will at least try to make the CSPP a meaningful part of the extra €20bn of monthly QE purchases announced at their March meeting. We now estimate the size of the eligible universe to be about €770bn based on amount outstanding, and €865bn by market value. These amounts are 50% larger than we expected and we now estimate monthly purchases to be to the tune of about €5bn. While we appreciate that this positive announcement signals the ECB means business when it comes to corporate bond purchases, it still remains to be seen to what extent challenging liquidity conditions in the corporate bond market allow it to buy in size. We think the ECB will try to put a lot of emphasis on primary market purchases and rely on some “supply response” from eligible issuers.

Focus on the “liquidity conditions” part as that is where the next surprise to the market will emerge when there is another exogenous shock to valuations.

Or perhaps not, because as DB’s Barnaby Martin writes in a note overnight, “amid the [ECB’s] potential hubris, perhaps there has never been a greater need for credit investors to be alert to the divergence of spreads and fundamentals. For instance, Glencore and Shell bonds would appear to be eligible for the ECB to buy. But if commodity prices sour again, will spreads for these names move wider? Moreover with the inclusion of UK headquartered names on the ECB eligible list, can potential Brexit concerns ever adequately be priced into Sterling credit spreads before the Referendum?”

More to the point, Martin who notes that the ECB’s CSPP “is bullish for high-grade and also high-yield (via BBs), and expect secondary cash spreads to tighten more meaningfully in June once ECB buying starts (just as issuance is likely to have cooled down)” asks the simple question “Will the ECB QE the world”?

His answer is a tongue in cheek yes.

The reason, the ECB left a very calculated loophole in its buying parameters which allows the ECB to buy the corporate bonds of virtually any global corporation as long as it has an SPV incorporated in Europe!

We think the scope of ECB corporate bond buying could potentially be much greater than we had initially anticipated in March. The ECB stands ready to buy bonds from Euro Area issuers even when their parent companies are outside of the bloc. Already we can find a number of US, UK and Swiss headquartered names that issue out of SPVs incorporated in the Euro Area. If this trend to SPV issuance catches on, then the ECB’s policies will likely be very reflationary for all credit markets across the globe, and because of a likely refinancing wave – equity markets too.

Before we get into the specifics, here is his detailed breakdown of the CSPP and its immediate implictions.

  • The Eurosystem’s collateral framework will be the basis for determining CSPP eligibility. The list is updated daily on the ECBs website (and each National Central Bank contributes). This will be the ultimate decider of whether a bond is “in” or “out”.
  • The Eurosystem will purchase IG, Euro-denominated bonds issued by non-bank corporations, established in the Euro Area.
  • Six Eurosystem NCBs will carry out purchases (Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Italy and Finland. Note no Netherlands). While the ECB will coordinate the purchases, each NCB will be responsible for purchases from a particular part of the Euro Area.
  • For an IG rating, a bond must have a minimum first-best credit assessment of at least BBB- obtained from an external rating agency. This confirms our expectation that the ECB will partially be buying the high-yield credit market.
  •  Purchases will take place in both primary and secondary markets.
  • Bonds with a minimum remaining maturity of 6m and a maximum remaining maturity of 30yr (at purchase time) will be eligible (in line with PSPP methodology).
  • Bonds where the issuer is a corporation established in the Euro Area, defined as the location of incorporation of the issuer, will be eligible. Importantly, bonds issued by corporations incorporated in the Euro Area whose ultimate parent is not based in the Euro Area are also eligible.
  • Bonds issued by a credit institution (or where the parent is a credit institution) will not be eligible. Neither will bonds issued by a Resolution Vehicle created to facilitate financial sector restructuring (such as the FROB for instance).
  • A 70% issue share limit will be applied to securities. This is much larger than we were expecting (but is actually a similar amount to covered bonds).
  • Senior insurance bonds are eligible, where the insurer is not defined as a credit institution and does not have a parent that is a credit institution.
  • Auto bank bonds will be eligible when the parent company is not a bank (which is the case for RCI Banque and VW bank bonds). Other auto finance bonds (leasing bonds etc.) appear eligible as the ECB does not classify them as credit institutions.
  • There is no minimum issuance volume for eligible debt instruments.
  • Negative yielding corporate debt is eligible (as long as the yield is more than the deposit rate).
  • There will be weekly and monthly publishing of CSPP volumes, and holdings will be made available for securities lending by the relevant national central banks.
  • Buying will partly reflect a benchmark. The benchmark will be based on the facevalue weighted amounts of debt that are eligible under the above paramaters.

And here is why the hedge fund known as the European Central Bank has just unleashed what BofA dubs QE for the world:

In our view, the most powerful conclusion from the above is that the ECB could likely end up buying corporate bonds from all over the world. The relevant paragraph is:

 

Debt instruments will be eligible for purchase, provided….the issuer is a corporation established in the euro area, defined as the location of incorporation of the issuer. Corporate debt instruments issued by corporations incorporated in the euro area whose ultimate parent is not based in the euro area are also eligible for purchase under the CSPP, provided they fulfil all the other eligibility criteria;

 

And in the FAQ:

 

Issuers incorporated in the euro area will be eligible for CSPP purchases. In practical terms, this means that issuers must be euro area residents, as in the list of marketable assets eligible as collateral for Eurosystem liquidity-providing operations. The location of incorporation of the issuer’s ultimate parent is not taken into consideration in this eligibility criterion. Thus, corporate debt instruments issued by corporations incorporated in the euro area but whose ultimate parent is not established in the euro area are eligible for purchase under the CSPP, provided they fulfil all other eligibility criteria.

 

Looking at the “ISSUER_RESIDENCE” column of the ECB eligible assets spreadsheet, we see a list of bonds that are classified as Euro Area resident because the issuance vehicle is an SPV (while the GUARANTOR_RESIDENCE is a non-Eurozone country). Table 1 lists these names. They are a mixture of US, Swiss and UK companies (based on the domicile in our corporate bond indices) but the ECB clearly views them as having Euro Area domicile because the issuing entity is a Dutch or Irish SPV.

 

Note that Glencore Finance bonds should be eligible to buy, as will Shell bonds.

 

 

 

The conclusion from this is twofold, in our view:

 

Firstly, the credit market could (worryingly) become much less sensitive to fundamentals such as commodity prices. For instance, if commodity prices fall, debt spreads of Glencore could still tighten if the ECB remains an active buyer of their bonds.

 

Secondly, there is clear motivation for non Euro-Area companies to issue Euro debt via a Euro-Area incorporated SPV. Our understanding is that the process (and time needed) to set up such a vehicle is not too cumbersome.

 

If this is the way that the credit market in Euros develops, then the ECB could potentially be “corporate QE’ing the world”. All credit markets stand to benefit in such a scenario as the trickle-down effect looks significant to us.

 

Yet, investors will need to keep an even closer eye on the likelihood that credit spreads disconnect from fundamentals. For instance, if the ECB buys UK credits then this will exacerbate the lack of Brexit premium in the £ credit market.

And once again, here is why U.S. companies will soon be rushing to create European SPVs to take advantage of the ECB’s geneorosity:

We believe the scope of the CSPP could potentially be much larger than we had initially thought in March. Bonds of Euro Area issuers whose ultimate parent company is outside the Euro Area will also be eligible. This could mean that the ECB buys bonds from US, UK and Swiss headquartered issuers, for example, simply because they fund via Euro Area SPVs. The ramification of this is that the ECB will be helping to reflate the global credit market.

But the cherry on top is that this is ultimately a brilliant plan to also keep the Euro weaker:

If more US issuers flock to the Euro credit market for funding, then
converting the money back into US Dollars would helpfully (for the ECB)
keep the Euro weak.

Our question: how long until we see a surge of US-based near insolvent shale companies rushing to incorporate SPVs in the Netherlands or Ireland, just to get the green light to be included in the ECB’s asset purchases. We are confident that within 2-3 months of this post, we will see at least one deeply distressed US oil and gas producer suddenly announcing that henceforth its ultimate parent is a post box located somewhere in Dublin…

As for the biggest implications, they are truly troubling: the disconnect between fundamentals and prices will hit never before seen levels, pushing not only equity but corporate bond prices dramatically higher, and as in the case of European sovereign bonds, prevent any true price discovery no matter how deplorable the underlying economic situation is. It also will confirm what most know: that price discovery no longer exists, that markets are merely policy vehicles, and that central banks will be more intertwined in capital markets than ever before, meaning that any attempt at renormalization will be doomed to fail as pricing in the elimination of the expanded global “Draghi put” will lead to a collapse of all asset prices, not just equities but also corporate bonds.

via http://ift.tt/1TnwyyY Tyler Durden

USDJPY Soars Most Since QQE2 Crushing Record Shorts

A rumor of The BoJ doing something moar (helping banks with NIRP loans) was the apparent catalyst for today’s epic USDJPY spike, but the kindling was a record position among speculative futures traders that USDJPY would continue to fall.

 

Today’s 250 pips plunge in Yen relative the dollar is the largest since Oct/Nov 2014 when The Fed ended QE3 and BoJ stepped in with QQE2 (or 22).

 

For now, however, the machines have failed to get inspiration for stock buying euphoria from this usually positive carry pump…

 

It seems Central Bank omnipotence is really starting to ebb – especially The BoJ’s.

via http://ift.tt/1Nod4Lu Tyler Durden