Schizophrenic Stocks Surge By Most In 29 Months Day After Plunging

The S&P swung 44 points from low-to-high today as panic-buying lifted stocks vertically on the back of an utter VIXtermination (from over 18 to under 15). Nasdaq surged over 2.5% from its lows before FOMC Minutes – the biggest swing since May 2012 (and biggest daily gains in a year). 10Y Yields closed at 2.33% (2.3249% lows) – the lowest since June 2013. The TSY curve steepened dramatically post-FOMC with 5Y now -18bps on the week and 30Y -7bps. The Dollar fell for the 3rd day in a row (-1.6%) – its biggest such drop in 15 months. Initial weakness in commodities was wiped away post-FOMC leaving Silver +3.3% on the week (Gold +2.3%). Oil saw no bounce closing at April 2013 lows (WTI below $87.50). The S&P and Dow managed to get to green on the week in the last few minutes (only the S&P held it into close). So in summary: FOMC Minutes sent Stocks Up, Bonds Up, and Gold & Silver Up; VIX down, USD down, and Oil down.

Today's epic ramp brought to you by AUDJPY…

 

And VIX…

 

The Russell 2000 rose almost 3% off its EU-close lows today…

 

This was Nasdaq's biggest day in a year and biggest intraday low to close swing since May 2012…

 

But since the last FOMC statement, stocks remain red…

 

Post September FOMC: Treasuries are still the best performer, S&P is down (as is gold) and the USD is up 1.5%

 

On the week, it seems today's mega ramp was all about getting the S&P green…

 

Bonds and stocks entirely decoupled (30Y is 10bps lower in yield than the last time stocks were here) – as The Fed (seemingly) said Buy it all…

 

Tresasury yields collapsed post-FOMC (and bull-steepened)

 

The Dollar was punched down for the 3rd day in a row… most sellinmg pressure coming in the US session…

 

USD weakness helped commodities (except oil)…

 

Charts: Bloomberg




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1rhAkJa Tyler Durden

Name The Hedge Fund

Back in 2007, the issue of leverage in the investment banking community (which hadn’t mattered to anybody for many years) suddenly mattered to everybody and for the usual reason in such cases: people started to worry about losing money. Amazingly, having financial institutions levered 30x became something to fear seemingly overnight; and, of course, whilst things like that can go on for a long time, as soon as the fear takes hold, it’s game over…

 

NAME THIS HEDGE FUND

Its leverage is extreme to say the least…

 

And it's been building for 7 years…

 

ANSWER:

Today, in 2014, after the massive expansion of its balance sheet in the name of peacekeeping, the Fed’s leverage far exceeds what was enough to cripple the world financial system back in 2008.

*  *  *

Luckily, the people managing it have years of experience in managing massive portfolios, dealing with illiquidity, and trading markets… oh wait!

Source: Grant Williams




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1rhAmRa Tyler Durden

Second Dallas Patient Exhibiting Ebola Symptoms

Following the sad death of Thomas Duncan this morning, CBS is now reporting that a possible second case of Ebola has been discovered in a suburb of Dallas:

  • *DALLAS AREA PATIENT SHOWS EBOLA SYMPTOMS: CBS

The patient claims to have had contact with Thomas Eric Duncan, referred to as Dallas ‘patient zero.’

 

 

As CBS reports,

An afternoon news conference has been called in Frisco, a suburb of Dallas, to discuss a possible second case of Ebola.

 

The patient claims to have had contact with Thomas Eric Duncan, referred to as Dallas ‘patient zero.’

 

It is not clear how the patient had contact with Duncan or if the patient was one of the about 50 people being monitored by state and local health officials.

 

The call came in shortly after noon from Care Now, 301 Main Street, where the patient was “exhibiting signs and symptoms of Ebola.”

 

The patient is being transported to a nearby hospital by Frisco firefighter-paramedics.

 

First responders are also examining clinical staff and other patients.  It is unknown how many other people may have been exposed to the patient.

*  *  *

 

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1EvovJC Tyler Durden

The Greatest Trick Mr. Market Ever Played?

Submitted by Bill Bonner via Acting-Man blog,

The Mantra

Yesterday, gold climbed back above $1,200 an ounce. US stocks went nowhere. Meanwhile, a chill went down our spine. A sense of dread filled our frontal cortex.

We read a report that was designed to give investors courage and hope. Instead, it felt to us like a guilty verdict in a murder trial. Even with good behavior, our sentence would probably last longer than we would.

A chart told the story. It showed three bull markets over the last 20 years. In the 1990s, the S&P 500 total return was 227%. Then from 2002 to 2007, another bull market. The total return this time: 108%. And from 2009 to 2014, the S&P 500 returned another 195%.

The lesson is unmistakable. It tells you to get in stocks… and stay in. If the market has a fainting spell, don’t get dizzy. Stick with stocks!

 

1-SPX

Don’t let the occasional 50-60% crashes disturb your peace of mind! You will always win in the long run! Long term bear markets don’t exist…well, maybe except in Japan. And much of the 18th century. But other than that, nothing can go wrong – click to enlarge.

 

Buy the Dips?

“Yes, we’ve seen some weak periods,” say the wealth managers, investment counselors and stockbrokers. “But they’ve always been followed by even greater strength. Each high has led to an even higher high.”

This is the message taken on board by a generation of investors. And if you go back further, you will find the same lesson learned by their fathers… even their grandfathers.

Since the end of World War II, there have been up markets, down markets and sideways markets. But if you had just gotten in and stayed in over any substantial length of time, you would have done well.

That is true for almost all financial assets – at least over the last 35 years – and true for stocks, especially, over the last 70 years. In 1960, the S&P 500 was 59. Yesterday, it was 1,964.

The lesson is now imbedded in our race memory… in our collective unconscious… and in our brains, our culture and our muscles. Even after a stroke or Alzheimer’s… after senile dementia and adult diapers… we will recite it on our deathbeds: “Buy the dips.”

We don’t have to think about it. We may fear the next recession… or the next sell-off on Wall Street… but we are confident the darkest night will always be followed by a bright dawn – always has!

And always will. At least, until it doesn’t.

 

2-Nikkei, Long term

A picture of the “impossible” – a stock market that remains 60% below its peak value almost a full 25 years later. It frequently paid to buy the dips, but there was never a full retracement of the lost ground – click to enlarge.

 

Mr. Market’s Biggest Coup

But what if Mr. Market is about to pull his biggest coup? What if the next dark night lasts 10… 20… 30 years? What if the experience of the last 70 years was sui generis? What if it was the result of particular conditions, which have now changed… and can’t be repeated? What if we are now looking at highs that we will never again see in our lifetimes?

Of course, what we don’t know about the future is encyclopedic. But wouldn’t it be a nice trick on Mr. Market’s part?

After World War II the US had the world’s largest economy – by far – and unlike its rivals in Europe, it was still intact. The GIs came home. They got married… they had the famous baby boom children… they started businesses and careers. Credit expanded – up 50 times since then.

And now, with interest rates lower than ever before, the credit expansion must be nearing its end. World War II vets are dying at the rate of about 1,000 a day. And their children are retiring… at a rate of 10,000 every day. The boomers are no longer adding to wealth; they’re subtracting from it.

They’re no longer expanding credit by borrowing to buy new houses and new cars; now, they’re living off their investments and Social Security, counting on their own savings or the kindness of strangers to see them through the rest of their lives.

You heard about the great jobs report on Friday. Some 248,000 new jobs were created. But wait… The real story is that of the 14 million people added to the adult population of the US since 2008, only 1 million have found real jobs.

That’s the important story: Growth is slowing. We have more people… but fewer of them paying the bills. Reagan’s former budget adviser David Stockman comments:

“Going back to September 2000, for example, there were only 76 million adults not in the labor force or unemployed, and that represented just 35.8% of the adult population of 213 million.

 

This means there has been a 26 million gain in the number of adults not working – even part-time – during that 14-year period. About 10 million of that gain is accounted for by retired workers on Social Security – a figure which has risen from 28.5 million to 38.5 million during the interim.

 

But where are the other 16 million? The answer is on disability (+4.5 million), food stamps (+25 million), survivors and dependents benefits, other forms of public aid, living in parents’ basements on student loans or not, or on the streets.

 

The employment ratio has plunged; full-time breadwinner jobs have actually shrunk; total labor hours employed have been stagnant; real GDP has grown at only 1.8% annually for 14 years – compared to 4% annually between 1956 and 1970; and real net capital investment is 20% below its turn-of-the-century level.

 

This isn’t at all like the postwar period. It is a whole different ballgame. We may never again in our lifetimes see stocks so high.”

 

3-labor force participation rate

Labor force participation is in a steep downtrend since the peak of the 1990s stock market mania – click to enlarge.

 

Charts by: BigCharts, St. Louis Federal Reserve Research




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1xpUKoO Tyler Durden

My First Interaction with Texas Police

Screen Shot 2014-10-08 at 12.46.10 PMMy children’s first interaction with the police was witnessing two officers get verbally upset at my refusal to provide them with my name while standing on my own property. Overall, it was a tough day for the kids.

The story begins innocuously enough. We rented a bounce house to have some fun, but the winds were too strong that day and the bounce house was starting floating away until it was ultimately stopped by our fence. When I called to get a refund, the company who rented it to us was not only unwilling to help out, but arrived upset that the bounce house had been ripped on my fence. Wanting to make a record of it, they called the local police.

Upon the arrival of the first county Sheriff, he kindly asked me what had happened. I told him that it blew away and that it was ridiculous that the police would even respond to such a situation. He agreed, but said that the bounce house company was alleging that I ripped it because I couldn’t get a refund. At that point, I told the officer this is a civil matter and I don’t want you or anyone else on my property. The officer complied and then asked for my name, my response was “no thanks.”

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1sgbqix
via IFTTT

Panic-Buying Ensues After FOMC Minutes Unleash Weaker Dollar

If you liked King Dollar, you’ll love Dumping Dollar… Gold, Treasuries, and Stocks are surging after the release of the FOMC minutes suggested The Fed will keep rates lower longer. The USDollar is dumping – just as The Fed suggested it was worried about a strong dollar. Stocks remain negative on the week and below the levels of the last FOMC…

 

 

On the week, stocks are still red..




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1qiX4rU Tyler Durden

Hilsenrath Confirms Dovish Fed Talking Down The Dollar

Federal Reserve officials have become more concerned about weak growth overseas and the impact of a strengthening U.S. dollar on the domestic economy, warns WSJ Fed-whisperer Jon Hilsenrath, adding that, the stronger currency, by reducing the cost of imported goods and services, could hold U.S. inflation below the Fed’s 2% objective. Fed staff also reduced its projection for medium-run growth in part because of these concerns. The minutes showed more clearly than before that concerns about global growth and the disinflationary impact of a strong currency are giving officials additional pause about moving quickly on rates.

 

Via The Wall Street Journal’s Jon Hilsenrath,

Federal Reserve officials have become more concerned about weak growth overseas and the impact of a strengthening U.S. dollar on the domestic economy, according to minutes of the Fed’s September policy meeting released Wednesday.

Officials worried at the Sept. 16-17 policy meeting that disappointing growth in Europe, Japan and China could crimp U.S. exports. Meantime, the stronger currency, by reducing the cost of imported goods and services, could hold U.S. inflation below the Fed’s 2% objective. Fed staff also reduced its projection for medium-run growth in part because of these concerns.

The collective worry is added reason for the Fed to hold short-term interest rates near zero, even as the economy improves.

“Some participants expressed concern that the persistent shortfall of economic growth and inflation in the euro area could lead to a further appreciation of the dollar and have adverse effects on the U.S. external sector,” according to the minutes, which were released by the Fed with the traditional three week lag. “Several participants added that slower economic growth in China or Japan or unanticipated events in the Middle East or Ukraine might pose a similar risk.”

These worries about global growth and the economic impacts of a strong dollar represent a new twist in the Fed’s running debate about when to raise short-term interest rates. Officials spent much of the summer discussing the timing and mechanics of rate increases. Many officials expect the first rate increase by mid-2015. An improving U.S. job market led some officials to press for earlier increases.

The minutes showed more clearly than before that concerns about global growth and the disinflationary impact of a strong currency are giving officials additional pause about moving quickly on rates.

The euro is down nearly 8% against the dollar so far this year, with much of the move happening since June. The Wall Street Journal’s broad dollar index is up more than 5%.

There are plenty of benefits from a strong currency. It goes hand-in-hand with capital inflows which could spur domestic investment. It also tamps down inflation and takes pressure off the central bank to push up interest rates.

But officials have been trying to push inflation up, not down, of late because it has run below their 2% goal for more than two years.

Fed officials have started speaking out more about their concerns about the global landscape.

“The appreciation of the dollar and weakening of foreign growth prospects,” in addition to low energy prices, will collectively “damp inflation pressures,” William Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said in a speech Tuesday at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Mr. Dudley added that “the appreciation of the dollar is likely due in part to increasing confidence that growth prospects in the U.S. have improved,” and as such, is a positive vote in favor of the American economy.

While officials debated the impacts of a weakening global environment on the U.S. economy, they pressed ahead with several other issues that have been on the Fed’s agenda for weeks. Among them, when and how to change their guidance to the public about short-term interest rates.

The Fed has been saying since last March that it would keep interest rates near zero for a “considerable time” after its bond-buying program ends. With the program on track to end in October, a debate has heated up about changing the guidance.

“Several participants thought that the current forward guidance regarding the federal funds rate suggested a longer period before liftoff, and perhaps also a more gradual increase in the federal funds rate thereafter, than they believed was likely to be appropriate given economic and financial conditions,” the minutes said. “In addition, the concern was raised that the reference to ‘considerable time’ in the current forward guidance could be misunderstood as a commitment rather than as data dependent.”

The minutes emphasized that the Fed’s decision on rates was in fact dependent on how the economy performed and suggested a shift in the guidance was taking shape.

“Most participants indicated a preference for clarifying the dependence of the current forward guidance on economic data and the Committee’s assessment of progress toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2% inflation,” the minutes said. “A clarification along these lines was seen as likely to improve the public’s understanding of the (Fed’s) reaction function while allowing the Committee to retain flexibility to respond appropriately to changes in the economic outlook.”




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1v2Ll8v Tyler Durden

FOMC Talks Down Dollar, Fears Growth Slowdown, “Considerable Time” Misunderstood

With the S&P down over 3% from September’s FOMC statement, the market needed some ‘good’ news from the Fed minutes to save the ‘wealth’ that has been created…

  • *FED OFFICIALS SAW GLOBAL SLOWDOWN AMONG RISKS TO U.S. OUTLOOK (growth)
  • *FOMC SAID SOME DEVELOPMENTS COULD UNDERMINE FINANCIAL STABILITY (bubbles)
  • *FED SAW RISING DOLLAR AS RISK TO EXPORTS, GROWTH, MINUTES SHOW (jawbone USD)

So The Fed fears bubbles, fears growth slowing down, and appears to be talking down the dollar. In other word, dovish minutes confirming the dovish statement was indeed dovish.

Pre-FOMC Minutes: S&P Futs 1936.50, 10Y 2.38%, USDJPY 108.75, Gold $1206

The last FOMC Statement and Minutes day performance…

 

Some of the key sections: on bubble fears:

Bankers in one District stated that, while they had eased the terms and conditions on loans in response to competition from other lenders, they had not taken on riskier loans. Some financial developments that could undermine financial stability over time were noted, including a deterioration in leveraged lending standards, stretched stock market valuations, and compressed risk spreads.

Fears about the dollar:

Over the intermeeting period, the foreign exchange value of the dollar had appreciated, particularly against the euro, the yen, and the pound sterling. Some participants expressed concern that the persistent shortfall of economic growth and inflation in the euro area could lead to a further appreciation of the dollar and have adverse effects on the U.S. external sector. Several participants added that slower economic growth in China or Japan or unanticipated events in the Middle East or Ukraine might pose a similar risk. At the same time, a couple of participants pointed out that the appreciation of the dollar might also tend to slow the gradual increase in inflation toward the FOMC’s 2 percent goal.

On forward guidance, and the need to not change it:

In addition, some participants saw the current forward guidance as appropriate in light of risk-management considerations, which suggested that it would be prudent to err on the side of patience while awaiting further evidence of sustained progress toward the Committee’s goals. In their view, the costs of downside shocks to the economy would be larger than those of upside shocks because, in current circumstances, it would be less problematic to remove accommodation quickly, if doing so becomes necessary, than to add accommodation. A number of participants also noted that changes to the forward guidance might be misinterpreted as a signal of a fundamental shift in the stance of policy that could result in an unintended tightening of financial conditions.

On the evolution of forward guidance, which confirms that the Fed once again has no idea what is going on:

Participants also discussed how the forward-guidance language might evolve once the Committee decides that the current formulation no longer appropriately conveys its intentions about the future stance of policy. Most participants indicated a preference for clarifying the dependence of the current forward guidance on economic data and the Committee’s assessment of progress toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. A clarification along these lines was seen as likely to improve the public’s understanding of the Committee’s reaction function while allowing the Committee to retain flexibility to respond appropriately to changes in the economic outlook. One participant favored using a numerical threshold based on the inflation outlook as a form of forward guidance. A few participants, however, noted the difficulties associated with expressing forward guidance in terms of numerical thresholds for some set of economic variables. Another participant indicated a preference for reducing reliance on explicit forward guidance in the statement and conveying instead guidance regarding the future stance of monetary policy through other mechanisms, including the SEP. It was noted that providing explicit forward guidance regarding the future path of the federal funds rate might become less important once a highly accommodative stance of policy is no longer appropriate and the process of policy normalization is well under way.

The full minutes (link)




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1v2LkSd Tyler Durden

The West Is Partly Responsible for the Ebola Crisis In Africa

Everyone’s seen the stories …

Ebola has become an epidemic in Liberia and Sierra Leone because those West African countries don’t have the resources to cope with the disaster. This is largely true because both countries have been torn apart by war.

Wikipedia notes regarding Liberia … the epicenter of the Ebola crisis:

Under Taylor’s leadership, Liberia became internationally known as a pariah state due to the use of blood diamonds and illegal timber exports to fund the Revolutionary United Front in the Sierra Leone Civil War.

 

***

 

The Liberian economy began a steady decline due to economic mismanagement following the 1980 coup. This decline was accelerated by the outbreak of civil war in 1989; GDP was reduced by an estimated 90% between 1989 and 1995, one of the fastest declines in history.

 

***

 

Civil war strife ended in 2003 after destroying approximately 95% of the country’s healthcare facilities. In 2009, government expenditure on health care per capita was US$22, accounting for 10.6% of total GDP. In 2008, Liberia had only 1 doctor and 27 nurses per 100,000 people.

As to Sierra Leone, Wikipedia points out:

Government corruption and mismanagement of the country’s natural resources contributed to the Sierra Leone Civil War (1991 to 2002), which over more than a decade devastated the country. It left more than 50,000 people dead, much of the country’s infrastructure destroyed, and over two million people displaced as refugees in neighbouring countries.

But what most Westerners don’t know is that our governments are partly responsible for the war that ravaged those countries’ healthcare infrastructure.

Liberia

The Boston Globe reported in 2009:

Former Liberian president and accused war criminal Charles G. Taylor said today that his infamous prison break from the Plymouth County Correctional Facility in 1985 was aided by the US government …

Agence France-Presse noted in 2008:

A former Liberian warlord allied to Charles Taylor has told the country’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) that the United States released the strongman from jail in 1985 to engineer the overthrow of president Samuel Doe.

 

[Prince Johnson, now a Liberian senator] has already made allegations about Washington’s dubious role in the 1989 to 1997 war ….

 

Taylor and Johnson were allies in the early 1980s, but they later fell out, with Johnson forming a rival organisation to Taylor’s National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL).

So both dictator Taylor – and his rival, a current Liberian Senator – testified that the U.S. broke Taylor out of jail.

In addition, the Boston Globe reported in 2012 that U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency documents confirmed that Taylor had CIA ties. Editors later largely retracted the story. However, other sources allegedly confirm it.

Sierra Leone

Taylor was instrumental in destroying Sierra Leone, as well …

As the Daily Mail wrote last year, Taylor was sentenced to 50 years in prison for his war crimes, crimes against humanity and terrorism in Sierra Leone:

The former president of Liberia was convicted by the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) on 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including terrorism, murder, rape and using child soldiers.

 
***

 

The court’s ruling came more than a decade after Taylor helped rebels go on a murderous rampage across war-torn Sierra Leone, raping, murdering and mutilating tens of thousands of innocent victims.

 

Taylor had aided and abetted crimes committed by Revolutionary United Front and Armed Forces Revolutionary Council rebels, while knowing well the kinds of crimes they were committing.

 

Presiding Judge George Gelaga King said: ‘Their primary purpose was to spread terror. Brutal violence was purposefully unleashed against civilians with the purpose of making them afraid, afraid that there would be more violence if they continued to resist.’

 
***

 

The court found Taylor provided crucial aid to rebels in Sierra Leone during that country’s 11-year civil war, which left an estimated 50,000 people dead before its conclusion in 2002.

 

Thousands more were left mutilated in a conflict that became known for its extreme cruelty, as rival rebel groups hacked off the limbs of their victims and carved their groups’ initials into opponents.

 

The rebels developed gruesome terms for the mutilations, offering victims the choice of ‘long sleeves’ or ‘short sleeves’ – having their hands hacked off or their arms sliced off above the elbow.

And it’s not just Taylor …

The Chicago Tribune reported in 2002:

The story of the American involvement in Sierra Leone is coming out in bits and pieces, but we can already see that the Clinton administration’s unrepentant policy there has been to empower one of the cruelest torturers and mass murderers of our times. And the story is far from over.

 

Let us focus first only on events in the spring of 1999: Foday Sankoh, whose savage Revolutionary United Front movement had massacred thousands and cut off the limbs of thousands more, had been arrested by Nigerian peacekeeping troops. Finally, he was in the hands of the at least nominally decent government in Sierra Leone. The long-suffering Sierra Leoneans, whose country had been a moderately prosperous former British colony, prayed that the worst was over.

 

But instead of insisting upon justice, President Clinton placed a now-famous phone call to Sankoh and persuaded him to enter a “peace accord.” The psychopathic Sankoh was told kindly by the American president that he could soon run for president! In the meantime, he would share power in the government and, supposedly, disarm his savage and often drugged teenaged troops, many of whom were ushered into the movement by being forced to kill their parents.

 

There was more to come. While taking Sankoh out of jail, where he was to be executed, the U.S. administration also refused to seriously support the UN-sponsored Nigerian troops because they had engaged in some minor “human-rights abuses.” The administration further refused to allow mercenaries, like the South African Executive Outcomes, to defeat Sankoh’s movement.

 

Thus, the only two groups that had the effective power to settle the situation were held back by this odd Clintonesque purism, while a homicidal killer went free. Once loosed again upon his people, Sankoh broke all of his promises –and what even reasonably rational person could not have predicted that? He called his latest convulsion of killing and maiming “Operation No Living Thing.” But now he is under arrest again–and the Clinton people have still another chance!

 

So the president sent the Rev. Jesse Jackson to West Africa to “mediate.” Before he left for Sierra Leone, he compared Foday Sankoh’s murderous RUF to Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress in South Africa, which fought for and gained equality for all South Africans. Sankoh, Jackson said sagely, could play a “positive role.”

 

Jackson traveled first to Liberia, which neighbors Sierra Leone, to meet with his “friend,” the other unspeakable dictator of West Africa, Charles Taylor. Once there, Jackson praised Taylor, who is responsible both for the terrible bloodletting in his own country as well as in Sierra Leone, as someone who could play a “very positive role” (please note that his role is slightly upgraded from Sankoh’s)

Guinea

The brutality and war brought by Charles Taylor also spilled over into Guinea … the third West African country hit with Ebola. Indeed:

Combatants from Sierra Leone and Liberia inevitably attacked border communities in neighboring Guinea in 1999-2000, pushing the violence into that otherwise peaceful country.

Hundreds of thousands of refugees also flooded into Guinea to escape the wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone:

Guinea remains the primary asylum country for West Africa’s refugees. Refugee influxes during the 1990s were so overwhelming that, for several years, Guinea hosted the largest refugee population on the continent. Some 120,000 Liberian and up to 50,000 Sierra Leonean refugees continued to reside in Guinea as of July 2003.

And the destruction of infrastructure in Sierra Leone means that people with Ebola are crossing the border into Guinea.

The big picture: All of the countries which the U.S. tinkers with descend into chaos.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1qiX1fS George Washington

Zandi’s “Workforce Vitality Index” Suggests Fed Should Hike Rates Sooner

If you like your ‘disappointing’ government-sponsored wage growth data, you can keep it… but if you are an ambitious talking-head economist looking to boost confidence in the economy in the hopes of a career in the administration, then ADP has just the ‘tool’ for you. Behold, the “ADP Workforce Vitality Index” – which measures the total real wages paid to the US private sector workforce, implying that the BLS is not measuring wage growth correctly as it is actually notably higher. In Q3, the ADP data grew 0.77% which they argue “is a good sign that may lead to increased consumer spending and a boost for the economy,” and implicitly means The Fed should be hiking rates sooner as ADP warns “real wages are accelerating.” Zandi the optimistic hawk?

 

Infographic: ADP Workforce Vitality Index Shows Real Wages Accelerating

 

 

*  *  *
Thus – Fed narrative confirmed: wage growth is accelerating and this is justy the excuse The Fed needs to exit QE and start tightening policy… because they know just how impotent they will be if another recession or slowdown or market crash occurs with rates at zero and markets more dovishly positioned than actual policy.

*  *  *
In conclusion, just as the PMIs are used and abused to fit whatever narrative is necessary to maintain the status quo of easy monetary policy OR “tighter policy because the economy is rebounding so well”, we suspect ADP’s efforts here are more of the same… given enough economic indicators, even a monkey can find reasons to be dovish forever or hawkish right now.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1v2LkS3 Tyler Durden