The Inflation Genie is Out of the Bottle

The Fed is rapidly losing control.

Core inflation has already broken above 2%.

This happened when OIL was imploding.

As well as commodities in general.

Why does this matter?

Because core inflation is ABOVE 2% at a time when commodity prices were FALLING. The Government HAS TO adjust its models to account for this so that ANY RISE in commodity prices will PUSH inflation to the upside.

Speaking of which, since bottoming in February, Oil is up over 22%. Industrial metals are up 8%.

Put simply, the inflation genie is out of the bottle. Core inflation is already moving higher at a time when prices of most basic goods are at 19-year lows. Any move higher in Oil and other commodities will only PUSH core inflation higher.

The Fed is cornered. Inflation is back. And Gold and Gold-related investments will be exploding higher in the coming weeks.

We just published a Special Investment Report concerning a secret back-door play on Gold that gives you access to 25 million ounces of Gold that the market is currently valuing at just $273 per ounce.

The report is titled The Gold Mountain: How to Buy Gold at $273 Per Ounce

We are giving away just 100 copies for FREE to the public.

To pick up yours, swing by:

http://ift.tt/1TII1fq

Best Regards

Graham Summers

Chief Market Strategist

Phoenix Capital Research

 

 

 

 


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1U2d4m8 Phoenix Capital Research

All Eyes On Michigan As Trump, Hillary Edge Closer To Historic Showdown For America’s Future

Frontrunners Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton will both face fresh tests on Tuesday, in their respective quests for their party’s presidential nomination.

Trump put on a respectable, if less spectacular performance on Saturday, prevailing in Louisiana and Kentucky but falling to Ted Cruz in Kansas and Maine. As Bloomberg writes, “Trump’s victories also were narrower than polling had indicated, suggesting that attacks on his crude language and ill-defined policies from 2012 nominee Mitt Romney and others could be having an impact.”

Maybe.

Or it could simply “suggest” polling error or the simple fact that blowing the field away by 20 points in every state simply isn’t realistic – even for a tycoon juggernaut with a groundswell of popular support and a “great head of hair.” Or, as The New York Times puts it, devoid of our trademark humor, “it is not clear whether he struggled to win because he had lost ground or because anti-Trump voters had consolidated around Mr. Cruz. [because] Mr. Trump’s share of the vote on Saturday was roughly in line with what he had won on Super Tuesday.”

In any event, Trump still holds a commanding lead going into contests to be held today in Michigan, Mississippi, Idaho, and Hawaii. Here’s what the delegate count looks like currently:

As the Democrats head into contests in Mississippi and Michigan, here’s how the delegates shape up:

Make no mistake, Michigan is the biggest prize for both parties today.

A Monmouth University poll shows Trump with a commanding 36-23% lead over Cruz, who is urging GOP voters to back him as he is now the only candidate capable of derailing The Donald. “It’s easy to talk about making America great again. You can even print that on a baseball cap, but the critical question is, do you understand the principles and values that made America great in the first place?” Cruz asked last night, at a rally.

But Trump’s support among the white working class who feel left out in the cold by outsourcing and the inexorable decline of the American manufacturing sector will likely carry the day for the billionaire.

(Trump speaks in Michigan last Friday)

“Trump appeals especially to the blue-collar voters in areas such as Macomb County north of Detroit, home of automotive plants and parts supplies and mostly white, union-member voters,” Stu Sandler, a Republican consultant from Ann Arbor who is not affiliated with any of the candidates, told Bloomberg. “Donald Trump’s campaign has fixed like a laser on working-class voters, and I think it’s really paid off,” he said.

For his part, John Kasich needs to perform well. “He has staked his presidential campaign on winning his home state, and Michigan’s industrial base and working-class roots bear similarities to the Buckeye State,” Bloomberg notes. “Kasich is betting that a strong finish in Michigan, followed by a victory a week later in Ohio with its 66 delegates, will prevent Trump from getting the needed delegates and start a new phase of the campaign.”

Make no mistake folks, that’s a pipe dream.

Here’s an aggregated poll from RealClearPolitics:

On the Democratic side of the coin, Hillary is 13 points ahead of “The Bern” in Michigan. “On paper, Michigan should be a good state for Mr. Sanders,” The New York Times notes, explaining that it’s “a white, working-class state that has been ravaged by outsourcing and ought to be receptive to Mr. Sanders’s message on economic issues.”

“It is also a fairly liberal state, with big college towns like Ann Arbor and Lansing,” The Times adds. But Sanders will need a dramatic come from behind win. Clinton is once again dominate when it comes to the African American vote and the elderly in Michigan clearly aren’t “feeling The Bern” either. Here’s the breakdown from Monmouth:

Hillary Clinton currently holds a 55% to 42% lead over Bernie Sanders in the Michigan Democratic primary. Clinton enjoys a solid edge among non-white voters (68% to 27%), who make up more than one-fourth of the likely electorate. Clinton (49%) and Sanders (48%) are virtually tied among white voters. Clinton has a 57% to 40% lead among voters who earn less than $50,000 a year, and a 54% to 42% lead among those who earn $50,000 or more. Sanders holds a solid lead (58% to 39%) among voters under the age of 50, but this is offset by Clinton’s more than 2-to-1 advantage among voters age 50 and older (65% to 31%).

As far as Sanders’ attempt to tie Hillary to trade deals that have cost Michigan manufacturing jobs, the former Secretary of State has proven to be teflon. “You would think that it would be a fertile issue in Michigan,” said the publisher of Inside Michigan Politics. “But it seems that Democrats are willing to give Clinton a pass on it.”

(fear the blue pantsuit)

As an aside, it seems like Clinton “gets a pass” on quite a bit. 

In any event, Michigan polls close at 8 p.m. local time. Stay tuned here for live coverage and the results, which we suspect will show a thorough “schlogning” on the GOP side and a rather decisive “burn” for “The Bern” on the Democratic ticket.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1OYZUyn Tyler Durden

Prices Matter – Why Central Bank ‘Fiddling’ Is A Bad Idea

Authored by Michael Shuman, originally posted at BloombergView.com,

Call me old fashioned, but I still think prices matter. I vividly recall the first time I studied those simple supply-and-demand graphs as a college freshman, and today, far too many years later, their basic logic remains undeniable. When prices are right, money flows to the most productive endeavors and economies work efficiently. When prices are wrong, crazy things eventually happen, with potentially dire consequences.

That’s why we should be very worried about Japan, where things are getting crazy. On March 1, the Japanese government sold benchmark, 10-year bonds at a negative yield for the first time ever. Think about that for a minute. The investors who bought these bonds not only loaned the Japanese government their money. They're paying for the privilege of doing so.

Why would any sane person do such a thing? A government with debt equivalent to more than 240 percent of national output — the largest load in the developed world — should surely have to pay investors a tidy sum to convince them to part with their money, not the other way around. But the bond market in Japan has become so distorted that investors believe it's in their interests to lend money at a cost to themselves. The only explanation is that prices in Japan have gone horribly, horribly awry, and that has made the illogical logical.

The culprit is the Bank of Japan. The entire purpose of its unorthodox stimulus programs — quantitative easing, negative interest rates — is, in effect, to get prices wrong: to press down interest rates below where they would normally go and force banks to lend money in ways they normally wouldn’t. The BOJ, in other words, is trying to alter prices to change the incentive structure in the economy in order to engineer certain results — to increase inflation, encourage investment and spark growth.

The problem is that the BOJ hasn’t achieved any of those objectives. Inflation in January, by one commonly used measure, was a pathetic zero. Gross domestic product has contracted in two of the past three quarters.

Instead, the BOJ is creating new problems by undermining the price mechanism. The central bank is buying up so many government bonds that it has effectively stripped them of risk to the investor and cost to the borrower. Investors probably bought up the bonds with negative yields speculating that they could flip them to the BOJ. Meanwhile, since the government can now earn money while borrowing it, the BOJ is removing any urgency for Japan's politicians to control debt and reduce budget deficits.

Worse, the central bank is undercutting the very goals it's trying to achieve. By wiping out returns to investors on safe investments like government bonds — the yield curve on them is as flat as a pancake — the BOJ is straining the incomes of savers and dampening the consumption that might help the economy revive. If debt pressures finally do push the government to hike taxes again, spending will take another hit.

This seems like ample proof that the BOJ’s unconventional strategies are going too far. Yet shockingly, many economists expect the BOJ to do even more. “Additional BOJ easing … is a matter of when, not if,” HSBC economist Izumi Devalier noted in late February.

None of this should come as any surprise. Japan has experimented with getting prices wrong since the end of World War II — for both good and ill. To pull the country out of the ashes, Japanese leaders directed credit and employed other tools to prod investment. That spurred decades of hyper-charged growth, but also led to massive excess capacity.

In the 1980s, the BOJ kept money inappropriately loose in an attempt to counter the impact of a stronger yen on Japanese corporations. That helped inflate one of the greatest price distortions in modern history — Japan's gargantuan asset bubble. Since the Nikkei's crash, the central bank has repeatedly tried to manipulate prices to correct the fallout from getting them wrong in the first place.

The red flags for other countries abound. Leaders in China, which used similar price-altering tactics to fuel its economic boom and is suffering from similar problems as a result, might want to accelerate their promised pro-market reforms to help set prices right, and the economy with them. For other central banks around the world, most notably the European Central Bank, which has also adopted negative rates, Japan’s case should offer a cautionary tale of the pitfalls of twisting prices too much.

And for policymakers just about everywhere, Japan should be a warning that monetary policy has its limits and their attempts to influence prices are no substitute for real economic reform aimed at lifting potential growth. Let’s not forget, after all, those old supply-and-demand charts.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1UbNgCW Tyler Durden

Which Countries Have The Highest Default Risk: A Global CDS Heatmap

Sweden beats USA and Germany as the least likely to default on its bonds but at the other end of the global sovereign risk spectrum lie two socialist utopiasVenezuela (CDS just shy of 6000bps) and Greece (CDS around 1800bps) are the nations most likely to default.

Of course, our readers will be well aware of this: back in December, when its CDS was trading at "only" 2300 bps (or whatever points upfront equivalent it was back then) we said Venezuela CDS are going much, much wider. Little did we know that in just about 14 months they would more than double, and as of last check, Venezuela CDS are just shy of 6000bps suggesting a default is virtually guaranteed.

So aside from these two socialist utopias, who else is on the default chopping block? The CDS heatmap below lays out all the countries which according to the market, are most likely to tell their creditors the money is gone… it's all gone.

Below, in order of declining default risk, are the ten most likely to follow Venezuela and Greece into the great default unknown:

  1. Ukraine
  2. Pakistan
  3. Egypt
  4. Brazil
  5. South Africa
  6. Russia
  7. Portugal
  8. Kazakhstan
  9. Turkey
  10. Vietnam

Sovereign Credit Default Swaps (CDS) are financial contracts that measure the risk of default on sovereign debt: the higher the spread, the greater the risk of default.

Source: BofA


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1QEO2Hf Tyler Durden

Bond Bears Bewildered – The Case For US Treasuries

Via EvergreenGavekal.com,

“The areas of consensus shift unbelievably fast; the bubbles of certainty are constantly exploding.”

– REM KOOLHAS, RENOWNED DUTCH ARCHITECT AND HARVARD UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR

SUMMARY

  • While conventional wisdom suggests that US government bond yields have nowhere to go but up, we believe the economic fundamentals will continue to weigh on interest rates for the foreseeable future.
  • Given their ability to appreciate during periods of market stress, US Treasury bonds (1) continue to play a critical role in any diversified portfolio, and (2) represent an actionable opportunity as the threat of risk aversion rises around the world.
  • US Treasury bonds are one of our largest portfolio positions at Evergreen GaveKal based on the conviction that they can generate attractive capital gains in the event that the US economy slides toward recession and the global equity bear market intensifies.
  • Should investors rush toward the safe haven of US Treasuries in the middle of a bear market, as we have consistently seen in times of panic, our plan would be to start rotating into other asset classes like equities and high yield bonds as falling prices lead to more attractive valuations.

THE CASE FOR US TREASURIES

The following commentary is from the Evergreen Investment Team:

Bond Bears Bewildered. We talk a lot about recognizing bubbles here at Evergreen. It’s part of our investment DNA.

While long-term investors hope to earn a healthy return on their savings by holding assets like stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities, or real estate over time, compounding capital is never a straightforward exercise. People are naturally emotional. Markets are inherently inefficient. And prices often lie.

When asset prices boom past their fundamental values, history tells us that busts are typically right around the corner. Either the cash-flows underpinning those assets will increase or prices will decrease, but investors who buy at bubbly valuations are almost always locking-in abysmal long-term returns.

It sounds simple enough. But while conventional wisdom often leads investors astray, it’s not always a matter of euphoria. Sometimes the consensus reacts to bubbles where there are none, which can do just as much damage to poorly positioned portfolios.

US Treasuries are the perfect example.

After thirty years of rising bond prices, falling inflation, and unchecked government spending, a popular view started to emerge that interest rates had nowhere to go but up after falling from nearly 16% in 1981 to less than 3% on the 10-year maturity T-note by December 2010.

“Americans have assumed the roller coaster only goes one way,” argued bond legend Bill Gross. “It’s been a great thrill as rates descended, but now we face an extended climb.”

10 YEAR US TREASURY BOND YIELDS (1962-PRESENT)

Figure 1

For a while that outlook seemed logical, even obvious, as it grew into conventional wisdom.

Some pundits argued that political dysfunction and ratings downgrades would lead bond market vigilantes to question the full faith and credit of the US government.

Figure 2

Others simply argued that bond yields would have to rise with US economic growth and inflation primed to reaccelerate after years of ultra-low interest rates and quantitative easing.

Figure 3

Either way, few investors expected “safe haven” yields to keep grinding lower—with the Evergreen investment team among the minority, as usual. Yet that is exactly what we’ve seen over the past few years.

As you can see in the graph below, long-dated Treasury prices (as indicated by the 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) have risen by more than 40% since 2011 as yields have fallen below 2% and 3% on the 10-year and 30-year bonds, respectively.

US TREASURY BOND ETF PRICE VERSUS YIELDS

ETF_
Source: Evergreen Gavekal, Bloomberg

While interest rates have jumped periodically, they have always fallen back down to earth (some would say to lower earth). And today—even in the face of Fed tightening—the long-term downtrend remains intact.

How Low Can Interest Rates Fall?

Looking ahead, we see a number of reasons why the downtrend in US Treasury rates can continue despite the conventional wisdom that rates must explode higher.

(1) The US economy is struggling under a massive debt load with total debt now exceeding 350% of GDP.

While high debt is one of the primary sources of economic and financial market instability in the world today, it is also widely misunderstood by bond market vigilantes with overactive imaginations.
Over the course of the last century, we’ve learned that a sovereign government with an active printing press and a dominant reserve currency can carry excessive debts for decades. But carrying that growing debt burden comes at the expense of economic growth, inflation, and productivity.

While central banks can try to jump-start growth and inflation in such an environment, we’re quickly learning that you can’t fix a debt problem with more debt. Despite temporary pops in the economic data, all that debt just weighs more heavily on growth and drags the economy closer to deflation over time.

That’s the trap we’re in today and it’s why US government bond yields continue to fall. But it’s still nowhere as bad as what we’re seeing in the Eurozone (with debt over 460% of GDP) or Japan (with total debt over 660% of GDP). And, contrary to conventional “wisdom”, instead of these towering debt levels causing rates to spike, bond yields in Japan and much of Europe are far lower than in the US, as noted below.

(2) Our population is aging rapidly with a growing share of capital owners reaching retirement age.

While the long-term impact of weak demographics is still up for debate in an economy experiencing rapid technological change, we do know that aging capital owners tend to become more risk averse in retirement.

Again, the United States—which accepts roughly 1 million immigrants each year—is not going over the same sharp demographic cliff we’re seeing in places like Japan, China, or Europe. However, shifting risk tolerance is certainly adding to the downward pressures on government bond yields.

Figure_5b

(3) The introduction of negative interest rates is creating more room for government yields to fall.

With much of the European Union (EU) and Japan now operating under negative interest rate policies (and the Fed signaling that it may join them at some point in the coming years), we’re watching something shocking and new in the world of finance.

Figure 6

Investors are paying premiums (rather than demanding premiums) to get their hands on supposedly “risk free” government bonds and yield curves are going sub-zero even in at-risk government bond markets. We’re not just talking about Japan, Germany, or the Netherlands, but governments with obvious debt problems like France, Italy, and Spain.

That’s insane and it seems Janet Yellen and her colleagues at the Fed are not far from joining the party.

Figure 7

Just to keep things in perspective, it’s worth noting that the 10-Year US Treasury yield is now trading at one of the widest spreads versus 10-Year German bunds and 10-Year French OATs since the euro’s introduction in 1999. Should US rates fall to match current levels in Germany or France, we would be looking at a sub-1% US Treasury yield with 10% or greater price gains.

10 YEAR GERMAN BUND—10 YEAR US TREASURY YIELD SPREADFigure 8

Source: Evergreen Gavekal, Bloomberg

10 YEAR FRENCH OATS—10 YEAR US TREASURY YIELD SPREADFigure 9

Source: Evergreen Gavekal, Bloomberg

Not only do falling foreign bond yields and sinking yield curves around the world send a powerful message to US Treasury investors that rates can go lower with the help of central banks, but these policies are also setting the stage for a future flight to safety (as we explain below).

(4) The divergence between major central banks is already triggering serious instability in the United States and abroad.

As you’ve no doubt heard by now, the divergence between central bank policy in the United States and our massively indebted trading partners in Europe in Japan has fueled a significant rise in the US dollar over the past several years. This, in turn, has contributed to an outright collapse in commodity prices and a general deterioration in global financial conditions.

While the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank have tried to address deflation risks with additional asset purchases and negative interest rates over the past couple years, such moves have only served to drive the US dollar higher. Should they press even harder in the coming months to keep their strengthening currencies relatively weak against the dollar, it threatens to unleash a serious wave of global risk aversion by destabilizing China and a host of other emerging markets.

On the flip side, a weaker US dollar, driven by deteriorating US economic activity and a potentially dovish turn in Fed policy, could lead to sharp rises in both the yen and the euro. That may seem like a better outcome for global stability, but we cannot be so sure given the poor quality of Europe’s banks or the banana republic level of debts owed by Japan’s government. To the extent that currency strength leads to a return of outright deflation and a deterioration in economic activity, it’s easy to see how a sharp fall in the US dollar could usher in a different kind of crisis.

If the rising risk of a US recession isn’t enough to push US Treasury rates to all-time lows, a shock out of Europe, Japan, China, or the emerging markets certainly could.

All this may sound bleak, but that’s the world we live in. And until the underlying debt burdens shake out, it’s very likely these forces will continue to favor US government bonds.

Am I Diversified?

As we remind our clients on a regular basis, US Treasuries play a critical role in any diversified portfolio. While cash and corporate bonds can dampen the impact of equity losses, US government bonds are the only true safe haven capable of generating strong capital gains during periods of market stress.

For the time being, think of it as an insurance policy with a negative premium. It pays you a modest sum to protect against extreme events as long as the nominal yield (currently 1.81%) is greater than the year-over-year inflation rate (currently 0.70%). That will change if and when the Fed moves to a negative interest rate policy, but the fundamentals are clearly on your side today.

This is an important point that many retail investors have neglected over the last several years. While shoring up their portfolios against an imminent bond bear market, few investors realized that they were concentrating their portfolios into a one way bet on accelerating inflation and rising earnings in an environment where equity prices had already outstripped their own fundamentals.

That’s tantamount to cancelling your property insurance with a forest fire already burning just a few miles down the road.

Just ask yourself, am I diversified? Am I insured against a major sell-off in the equity market? If not, we suggest visiting with your financial advisor and reassessing your risk tolerance. With markets experiencing a sharp short-squeeze over the last week, this may prove an opportune time to get defensive, embrace the diversifying power of US Treasuries, and prepare for another big leg down in the equity market (Evergreen continues to see an investable rally point at around 1600 on the S&P.)

At this point in the market cycle, we believe that cash, gold, long-dated Treasury bonds, high-grade corporate bonds, and beaten-up energy/MLPs are the only asset classes deserving of large allocations, but that will change as prices fall. Should investors rush toward the safe haven of US Treasuries in the middle of a bear market as we have consistently seen in times of panic, our plan would be to start rotating into other asset classes like equities and high yield bonds as falling prices lead to more attractive valuations.

If past is any guide, prices are likely to overshoot as much on the downside as they did on the upside. And for truly long-term investors—who are willing to be greedy when others are fearful—that will be exceedingly good news.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1R46VPO Tyler Durden

The Oil Short Squeeze Explained: Why Banks Are Aggressively Propping Up Energy Stocks

Last week, during the peak of the commodity short squeeze, we pointed out how this default cycle is shaping up to be vastly different from previous one: recovery rates for both secured and unsecured debts are at record low levels. More importantly, we noted how this notable variance is impacting lender behavior, explaining that banks – aware that the next leg lower in commodities is imminent – are not only forcing the squeeze in the most trashed stocks (by pulling borrow) but are doing everything in their power to “assist” energy companies to sell equity, and use the proceeds to take out as much of the banks’ balance sheet exposure as possible, so that when the default tsunami finally arrives, banks will be as far away as possible from the carnage. All of this was predicated on prior lender conversations with the Dallas Fed and the OCC, discussions which the Dallas Fed vocally denied accusing us of lying, yet which the WSJ confirmed, confirming the Dallas Fed was openly lying.

This was the punchline:

[Record low] recovery rate explain what we discussed earlier, namely the desire of banks to force an equity short squeeze in energy stocks, so these distressed names are able to issue equity with which to repay secured loans to banks who are scrambling to get out of the capital structure of distressed E&P names. Or as MatlinPatterson’s Michael Lipsky put it: “we always assume that secured lenders would roll into the bankruptcy become the DIP lenders, emerge from bankruptcy as the new secured debt of the company. But they don’t want to be there, so you are buying the debt behind them and you could find yourself in a situation where you could lose 100% of your money.

 

And so, one by one the pieces of the puzzle fall into place: banks, well aware that they are facing paltry recoveries in bankruptcy on their secured exposure (and unsecured creditors looking at 10 cents on the dollar), have engineered an oil short squeeze via oil ETFs…

 

 

 

… to push oil prices higher, to unleash the current record equity follow-on offering spree

… to take advantage of panicked investors some of whom are desperate to cover their shorts, and others who are just as desperate to buy the new equity issued. Those proceeds, however, will not go to organic growth or even to shore liquidity but straight to the bank to refi loan facilities and let banks, currently on the hook, leave silently by the back door. Meanwhile, the new investors have no security claims and zero liens, are at the very bottom of the capital structure, and  face near certain wipe outs.

 

In short, once the current short squeeze is over, expect everyone to start paying far more attention to recovery rates and the true value of “fundamentals.”

Going back to what Lipsky said, “the banks do not want to be there.” So where do they want to be? As far away as possible from the shale carnage when it does hit.

Today, courtesy of The New York Shock Exchange, we present just the case study demonstrating how this takes place in the real world. Here the story of troubled energy company “Lower oil prices for longer” Weatherford, its secured lender JPM, the incestuous relationship between the two, and how the latter can’t wait to get as far from the former as possible, in…

Why Would JP Morgan Raise Equity For An Insolvent Company

 

I am on record saying that Weatherford International is so highly-leveraged that it needs equity to stay afloat. With debt/EBITDA at 8x and $1 billion in principal payments coming due over the next year, the oilfield services giant is in dire straits. Weatherford has been in talks with JP Morgan Chase to re-negotiate its revolving credit facility — the only thing keeping the company afloat. However, in a move that shocked the financial markets, JP Morgan led an equity offering that raised $565 million for Weatherford. Based on liquidation value Weatherford is insolvent. The question remains, why would JP Morgan risk its reputation by selling shares in an insolvent company?

 

According to the prospectus, at Q4 2015 Weatherford had cash of $467 million debt of $7.5 billion. It debt was broken down as follows: [i] revolving credit facility ($967 million), [ii] other short-term loans ($214 million), [iii] current portion of long-term debt of $401 million and [iv] long-term debt of $5.9 billion. JP Morgan is head of a banking syndicate that has the revolving credit facility.

 

Even in an optimistic scenario I estimate Weatherford’s liquidation value is about $6.7 billion less than its stated book value. The lion’s share of the mark-downs are related to inventory ($1.1B), PP&E ($1.9B), intangibles and non-current assets ($3.5B). The write-offs would reduce Weatherford’s stated book value of $4.4 billion to – $2.2 billion. After the equity offering the liquidation value would rise to -$1.6 billion.

 

JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley also happen to be lead underwriters on the equity offering. The proceeds from the offering are expected to be used to repay the revolving credit facility.

 

In effect, JP Morgan is raising equity in a company with questionable prospects and using the funds to repay debt the company owes JP Morgan. The arrangement allows JP Morgan to get its money out prior to lenders subordinated to it get their $401 million payment. That’s smart in a way. What’s the point of having a priority position if you can’t use that leverage to get cashed out first before the ship sinks? The rub is that [i] it might represent a conflict of interest and [ii] would JP Morgan think it would be a good idea to hawk shares in an insolvent company if said insolvent company didn’t owe JP Morgan money?

The answer? JP Morgan doesn’t care how it looks; JP Morgan wants out and is happy to do it while algos and momentum chasing daytraders are bidding up the stock because this time oil has finally bottomed… we promise.

So here’s the good news: as a result of this coordinated lender collusion to prop up the energy sector long enough for the affected companies to sell equity and repay secured debt, the squeeze may last a while; as for the bad news: the only reason the squeeze is taking place is because banks are looking to get as far from the shale patch and the companies on it, as possible.

We leave it up to readers to decide which “news” is more relevant to their investing strategy.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1UbC2Ox Tyler Durden

Do you remember five men being arrested by NYPD on 9-11 for filming and celebrating the attack?

disbelief
– noun – dis·be·lief \?dis-b?-?l?f\
: a feeling that you do not or cannot believe or accept that something is true or real.

 

I cringe every time I see a, “9-11 Never Forget,” bumper sticker, t-shirt, or beer coozie. I sigh and say to myself, “How can you not forget what you do not know?”

There are many conspiracy theories surrounding 9-11, but this article focuses on just one conspiracy fact. The FBI released the, “Five Dancing Israelis,” that were arrested by the NYPD on 9-11 for filming and celebrating the attacks on the WTC and driving around in a van that tested positive for explosives.  These were admitted Mossad agents working undercover in the USA.

Here is an interesting exercise that I invite all zerohedge readers to try.  The next several times that you engage someone in a conversation, preferably a politician running for office, ask the following questions.

Do you remember anything about five Middle Eastern men being arrested by the NYPD on 9-11 for filming and celebrating the attacks on the WTC and driving around Manhattan in a van that tested positive for explosives…these were admitted foreign intelligence agents working undercover in the USA? 

In asking this question dozens of times, most recently in a conversation with two rabbis at one of the five Holocaust Museums in Texas, I have personally never, not once, had a person answer yes.

However, if they do answer yes to you, then ask if they recall what nation the men were from.  I would be shocked to hear any American say, “Israel.”

If they answer no, tell them they were Israeli Mossad agents, and ask if that helps them to remember.

Again, I have never had anyone say that they knew anything about what I was talking about.  Not once, not in any city, nor in any state of the USA.  If the conversation does continue, what I do hear, almost exclusively, is utter disbelief that what I am saying is true. 

But it is true.

Now, consider that since 9-11, the USA has invaded and occupied what was once the sovereign nation of Afghanistan for almost 15 years and counting, allegedly due to the roll it played in 9-11.  We have spent billions upon billions of dollars and killed tens of thousands of people, if not hundreds of thousands, in this war effort. 

 

A girl who was burned beyond recognition by a U.S. drone in Afghanistan and left for dead in a trashcan before she had to undergo reconstructive surgery.   The chemicals in the missiles burn so hot they can light a tank on fire, but this is somehow different from the chemical warfare allegedly waged by our enemy…

 

 

Hellfire thermobaric warhead using a metal augmented explosive charge is used primarily in urban warfare, against bunkers, buildings caves and other concealed targets. This warhead is designed to inflict greater damage in multi-room structures, compared to the Hellfire’s standard or blast-fragmentation warheads. The Metal Augmented Charge or MAC (Thermobaric) Hellfire, designated AGM-114N, has completed rapid development cycle in 2002 and was deployed during OIF by US Marines Helicopters in Iraq. The new warhead contains a fluorinated aluminum powder that is layered between the warhead casing and the PBXN-112 explosive fill. When the explosive detonates, the aluminum mixture is dispersed and rapidly burns. The resultant sustained high pressure is extremely effective against enemy personnel and structures. The AGM-114N is designed for deployment from helicopters such as the AH-1W or UAVs such as the Predator drones.

 

http://ift.tt/1pdPwhD

I hear that more US soldiers serving in Afghanistan now die from suicide than are killed by the Afghanis, in what is now the longest war in American history.  We are now in our third Presidential election in the USA since 9-11 and the occupation of Afghanistan, and the candidates aren’t talking about any of this, and the Fourth Estate sure as hell isn’t asking any questions. 

Why?

Don’t you want to know how the Presidential candidates feel about the fact that the FBI released the, “Five Dancing Israelis,” that were arrested by the NYPD on 9-11 for filming and celebrating the attacks on the WTC and driving around in a van that tested positive for explosives, admitted Mossad agents working undercover in the USA?  What about your congressmen and senators?  Don’t you want to know how our nation can imprison Afghanis in Guantanamo Bay, without trial, and torture them for information regarding 9-11…for more than a decade…yet the FBI released the Five Dancing Israelis to fly back to Israel and do television interviews.

If our politicians respond with disbelief, like everyone else I have ever asked, then what does that tell us?

If nobody ever asks them these questions, then what does that tell us?

If you are afraid to engage people with this type of conversation, then please read my article: http://ift.tt/21ZZiSp…

15.  Research your two senators and
one congressman at http://ift.tt/UqgJ9B Make a list of their 10
biggest donors, and send the list to your “representative” in an email
or letter.

16.  Read War is a Racket, by Smedley D. Butler.

17.  Read On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society, by Dave Grossman.

18.  Watch the online video of the TED Talk, A radical experiment in empathy, by Sam Richards.

 

Peace!


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1RyAZU8 hedgeless_horseman

Ahead Of This Week’s Main Event, Treasury Sells 3Y Paper In Poor Auction

While there may be a massive shortage and potential short squeeze forming at both the 10Y and 30Y part of the curve, there is far less euphoria when it comes to the short end, as confirmed moments ago when the Treasury sold $24 billion in 3 Year paper at a yield of 1.039%, a 0.3bps tail to the 1.036% When Issued, and higher compared to last month’s stellar 0.844%.

The internals were likewise lackluster, with the Bid to Cover of 2.710 coming at the lowest level since July 2009. Indirects of 46.2% were slightly above last month’s 41.5%, but below the TTM average of 50%. Directs also pulled back taking down 9.1% of the auction and leaving 44.7% to Dealers, their largest allotment since December 2014.

Overall a poor auction, whose concession was largely as expected.

Now the real question is what happens during this week’s “main event” – tomorrow’s 10Y and Thursday’s 30Y auctions, both of which have been massively shorted going into the auctions, and which – should something changed materially in the next 24 hours, could see a dramatic short squeeze if and when all those shorts have to unwind their positions.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1U23v6K Tyler Durden

Citi Slumps After CFO Forecasts Huge Revenue Drop

Just two days ago, everything was awesome – oil was up, stocks were up, financials were 'winning' – and then question started about why credit risk hadn't rallied like stocks.

 

 

But today we get our slap back to reality as Citi CFO unleashes the following: CITIGROUP SEES INVESTMENT BANKING REVENUE DOWN 25%, FIXED INCOME, EQUITY TRADING REV DOWN 15% YOY. The stock is rapidly giving up its "everything's fine" gains as Citi "hopes" for more rate hikes… but does not expect them.

 

Citigroup's CFO Gerspach is speaking at the RBC Conference in NYC… (live feed here)

“In fixed income, we see spread products continuing to have pressure,” Gerspach said. “That’s been a story for the last 18 months.”

  • *CITICORP EXPECTS $400 MLN REPOSITIONING RESERVE, GERSPACH SAYS
  • *CITIGROUP SAYS OTHER THAN ENERGY SECTOR, CREDIT PERFORMING WELL
  • *CITIGROUP CFO SAYS STILL ‘HOPE’ FED WILL RAISE RATES 2X IN 2016
  • *CITIGROUP CFO SAYS MORE LIKELY ONE RATE INCREASE IN 2016 BY FED
  • *CITIGROUP CFO: WOULD BE SURPRISED IF U.S. RATES GO NEGATIVE
  • *CITIGROUP CFO: QUESTIONS WHETHER NEGATIVE RATES ARE EFFECTIVE
  • *CITIGROUP CFO SAYS BANK FEELS VERY GOOD ABOUT CHINA EXPOSURE
  • *GERSPACH SEES FURTHER BRANCH CLOSURES IN U.S., INTERNATIONALLY

So did the Japanese banks.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1UbwbZQ Tyler Durden