South Korea Unveils It’s Own Air Defense Zone, Overlapping China’s And Japan’s

As fear and nationalism rise in Japan (and Abe’s grip on the people founders amid falling approval ratings and underperforming economic indicators such as GDP tonight), so another party has joined the debacle in the East China Sea. As NHK World reports, South Korea has officially announced that it will expand its air defense identification zone, making it partially overlap those of Japan and China. The game of chicken over small islands (and submerged rocks!) in the middle of nowhere continues…

 

 

 

The ‘triangle’ of doom in the East China Sea…

 

As NHK World notes,

South Korea has officially announced that it will expand its air defense identification zone, making it partially overlap those of Japan and China.

 

South Korea’s Defense Ministry said on Sunday that the expansion will go into effect on December 15th.

 

The move comes after China established its air defense zone over a wide area of the East China Sea last month.

 

The zone includes the Senkaku Islands, which are controlled by Japan and claimed by China and Taiwan.

 

Seoul has been demanding that Beijing redraw the zone because it partially overlaps the one set by South Korea and includes a submerged rock called Ieodo claimed by both nations. The Chinese call the rock Suyan.

 

The South Korean Defense Ministry said the expanded zone will also cover 2 small islands whose airspace partially overlaps Japan’s defense zone.

 

The ministry said it briefed Japan, the United States and China on the matter beforehand and the 3 countries suggested that the expansion is in line with international rules and is not an excessive measure.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/ifV0Fk6RZKQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

On The Taper Timing, It's The WSJ vs The NYT

Just out from the NYT’s Fed watcher Appelbaum:

Fed’s Plan to Taper Stimulus Effort Not Expected Until Next Year

 

Federal Reserve officials are in no hurry to retreat from their bond-buying campaign to stimulate the economy and are likely to postpone any cuts to the program until next year, according to public statements by Fed officials and interviews with some of them.

 

Job growth has strengthened in recent months, and Fed officials expect continued improvement in the coming year. The Fed’s chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, predicted in June that the Fed would taper its purchases by the end of this year, and officials say they still could announce such a cut next week, when the Fed’s policy-making committee is scheduled to hold its final meeting of the year.

 

But influential Fed officials see little harm in postponing the decision, particularly compared with the risks of pulling back too soon…

At the same time, out from the WSJ’s Hilsenrath:

Fed Closes In On Winding Down Bond Purchasing

 

Federal Reserve officials are closer to winding down their controversial $85 billion-a-month bond-purchase program, possibly as early as December, in the wake of Friday’s encouraging jobs report.

 

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke will have to build consensus among officials about how soon to pull back on a program that has been the center of market attention for months and whose effectiveness isn’t wholly clear. Many are getting more comfortable with starting a delicate process of winding the program down, though disagreements about timing and strategy could emerge, according to public comments and interviews with officials.

 

The Fed’s next policy meeting is Dec. 17-18 and a pullback, or tapering, is on the table, though some might want to wait until January or even later to see signs the recent strength in economic growth and hiring will be sustained. On Tuesday, officials go into a “blackout” period in which they stop speaking publicly and begin behind-the-scenes negotiations about what to do at the policy gathering.

 

One important consideration: Are investors prepared for a move? Talk of pulling back earlier this year jarred stock and credit markets. On Friday they seemed to take the prospect of a pullback in stride.

Who is right? Are both right? Are both wrong? According to some, especially those who manage other people’s money, and are paid only if the multiple expansion myth continues, any news will be good news, and all bad news is priced in.

Scott Minerd, global chief investment officer for Guggenheim Partners LLC, said, “It doesn’t matter” whether the Fed makes a decision on tapering this month or in 2014. “It’s priced in,” he said.

Sure, nothing matters, and the Taper – that tiny reduction in flow by $10 billion from $85 billion to $75 billion – was priced in in May also, until the Emerging Market nearly suffered a cardiac attack and the US bond market imploded…

Then again, does anyone even care? Far more relevant is what is the Fed’s price target for the Monday and year end close.

Also, how sad is it that this is what financial journalism has devolved to: when will the economist PhD overlords decree to (minimally) reduce their central-planning of the US economy and capital markets (and yes, Stalin must be spinning in his grave…)?

All completely meaningless questions to distract the population from the fact that while the markets rise to ever higher record highs, the social fabric in the US and globally stretches ever thinner…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/7cyOtjkKuGE/story01.htm Tyler Durden

On The Taper Timing, It’s The WSJ vs The NYT

Just out from the NYT’s Fed watcher Appelbaum:

Fed’s Plan to Taper Stimulus Effort Not Expected Until Next Year

 

Federal Reserve officials are in no hurry to retreat from their bond-buying campaign to stimulate the economy and are likely to postpone any cuts to the program until next year, according to public statements by Fed officials and interviews with some of them.

 

Job growth has strengthened in recent months, and Fed officials expect continued improvement in the coming year. The Fed’s chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, predicted in June that the Fed would taper its purchases by the end of this year, and officials say they still could announce such a cut next week, when the Fed’s policy-making committee is scheduled to hold its final meeting of the year.

 

But influential Fed officials see little harm in postponing the decision, particularly compared with the risks of pulling back too soon…

At the same time, out from the WSJ’s Hilsenrath:

Fed Closes In On Winding Down Bond Purchasing

 

Federal Reserve officials are closer to winding down their controversial $85 billion-a-month bond-purchase program, possibly as early as December, in the wake of Friday’s encouraging jobs report.

 

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke will have to build consensus among officials about how soon to pull back on a program that has been the center of market attention for months and whose effectiveness isn’t wholly clear. Many are getting more comfortable with starting a delicate process of winding the program down, though disagreements about timing and strategy could emerge, according to public comments and interviews with officials.

 

The Fed’s next policy meeting is Dec. 17-18 and a pullback, or tapering, is on the table, though some might want to wait until January or even later to see signs the recent strength in economic growth and hiring will be sustained. On Tuesday, officials go into a “blackout” period in which they stop speaking publicly and begin behind-the-scenes negotiations about what to do at the policy gathering.

 

One important consideration: Are investors prepared for a move? Talk of pulling back earlier this year jarred stock and credit markets. On Friday they seemed to take the prospect of a pullback in stride.

Who is right? Are both right? Are both wrong? According to some, especially those who manage other people’s money, and are paid only if the multiple expansion myth continues, any news will be good news, and all bad news is priced in.

Scott Minerd, global chief investment officer for Guggenheim Partners LLC, said, “It doesn’t matter” whether the Fed makes a decision on tapering this month or in 2014. “It’s priced in,” he said.

Sure, nothing matters, and the Taper – that tiny reduction in flow by $10 billion from $85 billion to $75 billion – was priced in in May also, until the Emerging Market nearly suffered a cardiac attack and the US bond market imploded…

Then again, does anyone even care? Far more relevant is what is the Fed’s price target for the Monday and year end close.

Also, how sad is it that this is what financial journalism has devolved to: when will the economist PhD overlords decree to (minimally) reduce their central-planning of the US economy and capital markets (and yes, Stalin must be spinning in his grave…)?

All completely meaningless questions to distract the population from the fact that while the markets rise to ever higher record highs, the social fabric in the US and globally stretches ever thinner…


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/7cyOtjkKuGE/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Thai Prime Minister Dissolves Parliament In Response To Protests, Calls For New Elections

Moments ago news hit the tape that during a televised speech in Bangkok, Thai Prime Minister has proposed a decree to dissolve parliament and call new elections. This is likely in response to the plans of government protesters, who had planned to march on Government House this morning to pressure Yingluck to step down and hold fresh elections.

Additionally, as VOA reports, a caretaker parliament will be appointed with limited powers.

The immediate result is that the Thai Baht gains 0.1% to 32.115 against the USD, after being down as much as 0.5% earlier. However, this kneejerk reaction may not last. As VOA also reports…

Whether or not this development will be seen as bullish for the EURJPY formerly known as the S&P500, is of course a rhetorical question: if it is a flashing red headline, it is always bullish for stocks.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/maRyDPo-TSQ/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Guest Post: The Triumph Of "Ron Paul"-ism

Submitted by Jim Quinn of The Burning Platform blog,

The American people are coming to the realization that everything Ron Paul has stood for in the last 40 years is true. He has been proven right regarding the Federal Reserve, the Military Industrial Complex, and the Warfare/Welfare Surveillance State. The American people have grown weary of inflation, wars of choice and being spied upon. Ron Paul’s consistently right message is finally making headway. He is a true American patriot.

 

America's Place In The World…

 

We Are All Non-Interventionists Now!

We are witnessing the triumph of Ron Paulism in the United States. The corporate media will avoid reporting it. They try their best to ignore Ron Paul’s 30 plus year intellectual march through our institutions.

But the facts in Pew Research’s 50 year survey of US views of “America’s place in the world” do not lie: This year the highest percentage of Americans ever — 53 percent — agree with the statement that “the US should mind its own business internationally and let other countries get along the best they can on their own.” (See illustration below)

Intervention

 

This means that despite the Mephistophelian temptations of the neoconservatives, offering war, interventionism, “responsibility to protect,” and humanitarian bombs, Americans are behind Ron Paul and the peacemakers — more than ever.

There is no major political figure in the United States who has more clearly identified himself with the cause of non-interventionism both at home and abroad.

When the Georgia/Russia war broke out in 2008, arch-neocon Senator John McCain incomprehensibly said that “we are all Georgians now.” He meant that we should go to war with Russia to back up a Georgian provocation. His slogan is laughable now, particularly as the facts have come out about the war.

But we can say this with all the facts to back us up: “We are (mostly) non-interventionists now!” We are in the growing majority, but still we have to fight the powers-that-be to get our message heard. The censorship and propaganda against our message is strong. The war machine does not give up easily.

Please continue to support the Ron Paul Institute’s efforts to advance Ron Paul’s important work. Read our website, share the articles, follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and if you can please financially support our efforts. Ron Paul is winning. Let’s help him!


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/5dqGM4TlpZ0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Guest Post: The Triumph Of “Ron Paul”-ism

Submitted by Jim Quinn of The Burning Platform blog,

The American people are coming to the realization that everything Ron Paul has stood for in the last 40 years is true. He has been proven right regarding the Federal Reserve, the Military Industrial Complex, and the Warfare/Welfare Surveillance State. The American people have grown weary of inflation, wars of choice and being spied upon. Ron Paul’s consistently right message is finally making headway. He is a true American patriot.

 

America's Place In The World…

 

We Are All Non-Interventionists Now!

We are witnessing the triumph of Ron Paulism in the United States. The corporate media will avoid reporting it. They try their best to ignore Ron Paul’s 30 plus year intellectual march through our institutions.

But the facts in Pew Research’s 50 year survey of US views of “America’s place in the world” do not lie: This year the highest percentage of Americans ever — 53 percent — agree with the statement that “the US should mind its own business internationally and let other countries get along the best they can on their own.” (See illustration below)

Intervention

 

This means that despite the Mephistophelian temptations of the neoconservatives, offering war, interventionism, “responsibility to protect,” and humanitarian bombs, Americans are behind Ron Paul and the peacemakers — more than ever.

There is no major political figure in the United States who has more clearly identified himself with the cause of non-interventionism both at home and abroad.

When the Georgia/Russia war broke out in 2008, arch-neocon Senator John McCain incomprehensibly said that “we are all Georgians now.” He meant that we should go to war with Russia to back up a Georgian provocation. His slogan is laughable now, particularly as the facts have come out about the war.

But we can say this with all the facts to back us up: “We are (mostly) non-interventionists now!” We are in the growing majority, but still we have to fight the powers-that-be to get our message heard. The censorship and propaganda against our message is strong. The war machine does not give up easily.

Please continue to support the Ron Paul Institute’s efforts to advance Ron Paul’s important work. Read our website, share the articles, follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and if you can please financially support our efforts. Ron Paul is winning. Let’s help him!


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/5dqGM4TlpZ0/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Interactive Atlas Of The Leading Causes Of Premature Death

While some may think trading these manipulated capital markets has become a leading cause of death over the past year, that is not the case. At least not yet. Instead, the leading causes of early death are shown on the chart below compiled by Wired. It maps “the global cost of early mortality – some 1.7 billion years of potential human life forefited annually – sorted by cause of death.”

Not surprisingly, Wired notes that heart disease and stroke cause more than a quarter of all deaths. But since they hit mainly older people, the cost in years of life lost is relatively small. Curiously, one of the biggest net contributors to premature loss of life is Malaria, which is one of the biggest killers of children across the developing world. Also surprising: while not large (yet) in absolute terms, natural disasters are by far the fastest-growing contributor to the death toll.

The good news: the big yellow block representing infectious diseases and birth problems, is showing a rapid decline. Which means that “we’re making progress; deaths from disorders that could be avoided with basic medications, clean water and neo-natal care, are on the decline.”

Some additional perspectives are provided from the below two interactive maps by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, analyzing Disability Adjusted Life-Years (DALY) impact from various noted causes. A quick primer:

The disability-adjusted life year (DALY) is a measure of overall disease burden, expressed as the number of years lost due to ill-health, disability or early death.

 

Originally developed by Harvard University for the World Bank in 1990, the World Health Organization subsequently adopted the method in 1996 as part of the Ad hoc Committee on Health Research “Investing in Health Research & Development” report. The DALY is becoming increasingly common in the field of public health and health impact assessment (HIA). It “extends the concept of potential years of life lost due to premature death…to include equivalent years of ‘healthy’ life lost by virtue of being in states of poor health or disability.” In so doing, mortality and morbidity are combined into a single, common metric.

An interactive treemap of all causes:

 

A different perspective, this time broken down by risk factors. The far and ahead leader: “dietary risks”, which makes sense for a nation which every day roll sever further into record obesity land.

 

The best news: clicking too fast on the SPY heatmap in order to benefit from Bernanke’s “Wealth Effect” is still not a leading cause of premature death.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/8AM3Ml8mlc4/story01.htm Tyler Durden

The 9 Words Every Democratic Congressman Dreads

Following yesterday’s polls, we suspect this cartoon sums up the view of many ‘faithful’ as they head into the new year. Of course, no matter what faces change next year, the Fed will always be there…

 

“…if you like your seat, you can keep your seat…”


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/13FxaUk0jks/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Macro Myopia and Preview of the Week’s Highlights

The solid US jobs report that saw the world’s largest economy add a little more than 200k net new jobs and the unemployment rate fall three tenths of a percent to 7.0%, even with the participation rate ticking up got some chins wagging about that the Federal Reserve tapering at its next FOMC meeting on December 17-18.

 

Even the usually astute Financial Times jumped all over the story with its page three story “US jobs boost raises speculation on Fed taper”.  Not once in the article did the reporters note that US bond yields actually slipped after the jobs report or that the dollar fell.  The speculation that it refers to was not found in price, but in one economist it cited.

 

Those inclined to the Fed tapering in December seem myopic.  The employment was not the only economic report that was released before the weekend.  The US also reported that the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, the deflator for core personal consumption expenditures, which slipped to 1.1%, the slowest pace in more than 2.5 years.  The FT thought this was worth a single paragraph it is report on the prospects of tapering.

 

The Financial Times did not see fit, though, to even recognize in passing,  the fiscal uncertainty that hangs over the market. Recall that the lack of fiscal clarity influenced the Fed’s decision not to taper in September. Although December 13 is a self-imposed deadline for an agreement, the heightened tensions, especially in the aftermath of the Senate Democrats parliamentary maneuver that allows the filibuster to over ridden on presidential appointments with a simple majority, and the usual brinkmanship tactics warns that a final deal may be elusive until closer to the next legislative deadline in mid-January.

 

Nor do most observers take seriously the institutional interests of the Federal Reserve.  We have argued that the seven person Board of Governors is going to see significant changes in the months ahead.  The Fed’s forward guidance that is to replace QE as the main policy tool will be more credible if issued by the next Fed chairman not the soon-to-leave current chairman.  Yellen-led tapering will build her (and the new Fed’s) credibility and help correct perceptions that she is a super-dove.  The macro-economic impact of waiting a month or two before reducing asset purchases by $10 bln or $15 bln is minor at best.

 

More importantly, investors appear to be accepting the Fed’s argument in a way that it had not done so previously:  tapering is not tightening.  The US 2-year yield was above 50 bp in early September as many expected tapering.  It was more than halved and now is near 30 bp, despite ideas that tapering could be imminent.

 

The German 2-year yield fell to 5 bp in early November as many took seriously the possibility that the ECB could soon adopt a negative deposit rate.  As ECB officials played down the risk of deflation and the a negative deposit rate seemed remote, the German 2-year yield jumped and was near 25 bp before the weekend (settling near 22 bp).  This saw the 2-year interest rate spread, which the euro-dollar exchange rate is sensitive to, fall below 9 bp to stand near the lowest levels since last February.  

 

The 10-year interest rate differential between the US and Germany rose above 100 bp.  This is near the highest since before the crisis.  Yet, it offered the dollar little support.  The euro finished at its best level since the end of October and appears poised to re-challenge the $1.3830 2-year high set on October 25.

 

This analysis helps explain why the US dollar is not rallying on good economic news and why an uptick in retail sales, the economic highlight of the week, may not stop led the greenback much support.  Separately, the flow of funds report on Monday is likely to show a new record high household wealth; completely recouping the sharp drop triggered by the crisis.  Sharp gains in equity prices and more modest gain real estate have been experienced, but the holdings are highly concentrated.  

 

Europe reports industrial production figures.  A strong German report is possible, despite the weakness in orders data before the weekend.  Survey data suggests a re-acceleration of the German economy in Q4.  To be sure, it is not the poor growth prospects that incite the ECB to act, but the disinflationary forces, the increased volatility of short-term interest rates as excess liquidity evaporates, and small and medium sized businesses remain locked out from finance.  Separately,  the industrial dispute in a large refinery in Scotland warns of potential disappointment with the UK’s figures.    

 

Sweden reports November CPI figures and this is the last important report ahead of the Dec 17 Riksbank meeting.   Poor economic data has fanned speculation of a rate cut, though the market seems a bit divided, with some looking for the central bank to stand pat until early next year.  

The Swiss National Bank and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand meet this week.  Neither is likely to change policy.  The latter is expected to hike rates toward the end of Q1 14.  The former is likely to reaffirm its CHF1.20 floor for the euro and a 0-0.25% target for 3-month LIBOR. 

 

Japan is expected to report a current account surplus in October after a seasonally adjusted deficit in September early Monday in Tokyo.  It will also report revisions to Q3 GDP.  These revisions are likely to be to the downside and quarterly annualized growth is expected to slow to 1.6% from the initial estimate of 1.9%, and down from 3.8% in Q2.  More important will be the Oct machinery orders later in the week which will shed insight into capex in Q4.  

 

Australia reports Oct employment data in the middle of the week.  The consensus calls for a 10k increase after a 1.1k increase in September.  This understates the Sept weakness as nearly 28k full time positions were lost.   The Oct unemployment rate may tick up to 5.7% from 5.6%.  

 

China reports a host of data this week, including CPI early Monday, industrial production, new lending and retail sales.  Although there a number of factors behind the rise in Chinese bond yields, which as we noted, has become a more worrisome development for Chinese officials, can be largely accounted for by the rise in inflation.  The risk is for another rise to 3.3% from 3.2%, which would be the highest since April 2012.  

 

Over the weekend, China reported a much larger than expected trade surplus.  The $33.8 bln Nov surplus is the biggest since Jan 2009.  Exports jumped.  The 12.7% (year-over-year) increase was more than twice the rise reported in Oct.  Imports slumped.  The 5.3% increase is the smallest since June.  It compares with a 7.6% increase in Oct and consensus expectations for a 7% increase.  

 

The PBOC said recently that there was no longer a need to accumulate reserves.  Some observers took this to mean that it would no longer do so and that this was negative for US Treasuries.  We are less sanguine.  . The combination of the trade surplus coupled with severe limits on the yuan and capital flows means that it will still be accumulating reserves.  

 

Finally there were two other notable developments over the weekend.  First, after much consternation, a World Trade Agreement was struck.  Critics will complain that the agreement is not ideal, as if any agreement is.  On balance, officials will embrace it in anticipation of boosting world trade and won’t refrain from making the good an enemy of the perfect.   

 

Second South Korea has announced an expansion of its air defense identification zone, which will now overall China’s newly declared zone.  The immediate market impact may be minimal, but the escalation of tensions as the year winds down is troublesome.  The animosity between Japan and South Korea seems to be preventing a coordinated response. This absence works in China’s interest. 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/f-ivtulMjTU/story01.htm Marc To Market

Macro Myopia and Preview of the Week's Highlights

The solid US jobs report that saw the world’s largest economy add a little more than 200k net new jobs and the unemployment rate fall three tenths of a percent to 7.0%, even with the participation rate ticking up got some chins wagging about that the Federal Reserve tapering at its next FOMC meeting on December 17-18.

 

Even the usually astute Financial Times jumped all over the story with its page three story “US jobs boost raises speculation on Fed taper”.  Not once in the article did the reporters note that US bond yields actually slipped after the jobs report or that the dollar fell.  The speculation that it refers to was not found in price, but in one economist it cited.

 

Those inclined to the Fed tapering in December seem myopic.  The employment was not the only economic report that was released before the weekend.  The US also reported that the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, the deflator for core personal consumption expenditures, which slipped to 1.1%, the slowest pace in more than 2.5 years.  The FT thought this was worth a single paragraph it is report on the prospects of tapering.

 

The Financial Times did not see fit, though, to even recognize in passing,  the fiscal uncertainty that hangs over the market. Recall that the lack of fiscal clarity influenced the Fed’s decision not to taper in September. Although December 13 is a self-imposed deadline for an agreement, the heightened tensions, especially in the aftermath of the Senate Democrats parliamentary maneuver that allows the filibuster to over ridden on presidential appointments with a simple majority, and the usual brinkmanship tactics warns that a final deal may be elusive until closer to the next legislative deadline in mid-January.

 

Nor do most observers take seriously the institutional interests of the Federal Reserve.  We have argued that the seven person Board of Governors is going to see significant changes in the months ahead.  The Fed’s forward guidance that is to replace QE as the main policy tool will be more credible if issued by the next Fed chairman not the soon-to-leave current chairman.  Yellen-led tapering will build her (and the new Fed’s) credibility and help correct perceptions that she is a super-dove.  The macro-economic impact of waiting a month or two before reducing asset purchases by $10 bln or $15 bln is minor at best.

 

More importantly, investors appear to be accepting the Fed’s argument in a way that it had not done so previously:  tapering is not tightening.  The US 2-year yield was above 50 bp in early September as many expected tapering.  It was more than halved and now is near 30 bp, despite ideas that tapering could be imminent.

 

The German 2-year yield fell to 5 bp in early November as many took seriously the possibility that the ECB could soon adopt a negative deposit rate.  As ECB officials played down the risk of deflation and the a negative deposit rate seemed remote, the German 2-year yield jumped and was near 25 bp before the weekend (settling near 22 bp).  This saw the 2-year interest rate spread, which the euro-dollar exchange rate is sensitive to, fall below 9 bp to stand near the lowest levels since last February.  

 

The 10-year interest rate differential between the US and Germany rose above 100 bp.  This is near the highest since before the crisis.  Yet, it offered the dollar little support.  The euro finished at its best level since the end of October and appears poised to re-challenge the $1.3830 2-year high set on October 25.

 

This analysis helps explain why the US dollar is not rallying on good economic news and why an uptick in retail sales, the economic highlight of the week, may not stop led the greenback much support.  Separately, the flow of funds report on Monday is likely to show a new record high household wealth; completely recouping the sharp drop triggered by the crisis.  Sharp gains in equity prices and more modest gain real estate have been experienced, but the holdings are highly concentrated.  

 

Europe reports industrial production figures.  A strong German report is possible, despite the weakness in orders data before the weekend.  Survey data suggests a re-acceleration of the German economy in Q4.  To be sure, it is not the poor growth prospects that incite the ECB to act, but the disinflationary forces, the increased volatility of short-term interest rates as excess liquidity evaporates, and small and medium sized businesses remain locked out from finance.  Separately,  the industrial dispute in a large refinery in Scotland warns of potential disappointment with the UK’s figures.    

 

Sweden reports November CPI figures and this is the last important report ahead of the Dec 17 Riksbank meeting.   Poor economic data has fanned speculation of a rate cut, though the market seems a bit divided, with some looking for the central bank to stand pat until early next year.  

The Swiss National Bank and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand meet this week.  Neither is likely to change policy.  The latter is expected to hike rates toward the end of Q1 14.  The former is likely to reaffirm its CHF1.20 floor for the euro and a 0-0.25% target for 3-month LIBOR. 

 

Japan is expected to report a current account surplus in October after a seasonally adjusted deficit in September early Monday in Tokyo.  It will also report revisions to Q3 GDP.  These revisions are likely to be to the downside and quarterly annualized growth is expected to slow to 1.6% from the initial estimate of 1.9%, and down from 3.8% in Q2.  More important will be the Oct machinery orders later in the week which will shed insight into capex in Q4.  

 

Australia reports Oct employment data in the middle of the week.  The consensus calls for a 10k increase after a 1.1k increase in September.  This understates the Sept weakness as nearly 28k full time positions were lost.   The Oct unemployment rate may tick up to 5.7% from 5.6%.  

 

China reports a host of data this week, including CPI early Monday, industrial production, new lending and retail sales.  Although there a number of factors behind the rise in Chinese bond yields, which as we noted, has become a more worrisome development for Chinese officials, can be largely accounted for by the rise in inflation.  The risk is for another rise to 3.3% from 3.2%, which would be the highest since April 2012.  

 

Over the weekend, China reported a much larger than expected trade surplus.  The $33.8 bln Nov surplus is the biggest since Jan 2009.  Exports jumped.  The 12.7% (year-over-year) increase was more than twice the rise reported in Oct.  Imports slumped.  The 5.3% increase is the smallest since June.  It compares with a 7.6% increase in Oct and consensus expectations for a 7% increase.  

 

The PBOC said recently that there was no longer a need to accumulate reserves.  Some observers took this to mean that it would no longer do so and that this was negative for US Treasuries.  We are less sanguine.  . The combination of the trade surplus coupled with severe limits on the yuan and capital flows means that it will still be accumulating reserves.  

 

Finally there were two other notable developments over the weekend.  First, after much consternation, a World Trade Agreement was struck.  Critics will complain that the agreement is not ideal, as if any agreement is.  On balance, officials will embrace it in anticipation of boosting world trade and won’t refrain from making the good an enemy of the perfect.   

 

Second South Korea h
as announced an expansion of its air defense identification zone, which will now overall China’s newly declared zone.  The immediate market impact may be minimal, but the escalation of tensions as the year winds down is troublesome.  The animosity between Japan and South Korea seems to be preventing a coordinated response. This absence works in China’s interest. 


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/f-ivtulMjTU/story01.htm Marc To Market