US Equities Are Surging, Here’s Why

After tumbling yesterday, US equities are surging this morning ahead of payrolls…

 

Here’s why:

  • New anti-establishment Italian government? Check.

  • New anti-establishment, socialist Spanish government? Check.

  • Trade war between the US and Europe, Mexico, & Canada? Check.

  • Deutsche Bank (most systemically risky bank in the world at one point) downgraded to a B-handle? Check.

So all we need now is a dismal jobs or wage growth print and bad news will be really great news.

But did Trump just spoil the hopes of a bad print?

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2kJJ0z3 Tyler Durden

Trump Blasts “No Talent” Samantha Bee: “Why Aren’t They Firing Her?”

With advertisers fleeing and the left desperately defending so-called comedian Samantha Bee’s calling Ivanka Trump a “feckless c**t,” President Trump has now chimed in on the double-standards that were so obvious and previously pointed out over the Roseanne Barr debacle.

Trump asks “Why aren’t they firing no talent Samantha Bee for the horrible language used on her low ratings show?” A good question that points to a “a total double standard” in the liberal media by which any anti-Trump comment is fair but any comment by a pro-Trumper is decried. However, Trump has some soothing words, “that’s O.K., we are Winning, and will be doing so for a long time to come!”


Notably, TBS has taken down Wednesday’s “Full Frontal with Samantha Bee” episode from both its homepage and YouTube. It is also no longer for sale on Amazon, iTunes or Vudu.

And if you’re undecided on what to feel about what TBS should do, this should help…

via RSS https://ift.tt/2J28i9R Tyler Durden

Three critical lessons from Europe’s recent mini-meltdown

Trying to trace the origins of the latest political crisis in Italy is like… well… trying to trace the origins of the decline of the Roman Empire.

There simply is no good starting point.

You can’t talk about the decline of Rome without a lengthy discussion of how destructive Diocletian’s Edict on Wages and Prices was in the early 4th century.

But you’d have to go further back than that and discuss all the lunatic emperors preceding him, all the way back to Caligula.

But you can’t talk about Caligula without bringing up the effects of the civil war between Octavian and Marc Antony… which was a direct result of the previous civil war between Julius Caesar and Pompeius Magnus.

Before long you’ve gone back in time more than 500 years trying to figure out why the Roman Empire collapsed.

Modern Italy isn’t so different. After all, this is a country so unstable that it’s had 64 governments in the seven decades since the end of World War II, averaging a new government every 14 months.

That has to be some kind of world record.

And to accurately diagnose how Italy ended up in such dire financial and political turmoil, you’d have to go back a -very- long way.

But for the sake of brevity, we’ll just go back to March. Italy held elections, and the “5-Star Movement” political party won the most seats… but not a clear majority.

This required them to establish a coalition with other political parties, which took weeks of haggling and negotiating.

But finally the 5-Star Movement was able to hammer out a deal and present a formal plan to Italy’s head of state, President Sergio Mattarella.

The President of Italy is almost purely a ceremonial role, like the Queen of England. But he does have the authority to reject key government appointments, including Prime Minister and Finance Minister.

And that’s exactly what he did– specifically opposing the nominee for Finance Minister, an economist named Paolo Savona.

Savona is a huge critic of the euro, and President Mattarella thought him too dangerous for the post.

Again, while the origins are more complicated than that, this is the basic plotline behind the most recent crisis.

Late Thursday night the Italian government announced a compromise, supposedly bringing an end to the uncertainty.

But to me, none of that matters. What I find -really- important is what an enormous impact this soap opera had across the world. And I think there are three critical lessons to take away:

1) On the day that the finance minster was rejected, financial markets worldwide tanked.

Italy’s stock market plunged 5%, which is considered a major drop.

But curiously, the stock market in the US fell as well, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average shedding 400 points. Even markets in China and Japan had significant drops as a result of the Italy turmoil.

Now, it’s easy to see why Italy’s markets fell. And even the rest of Europe. But the entire world?

Granted, a lot of people made a really big deal out of this event, concluding that it signals the end of the euro.. or Europe itself… or some other such drama.

Sure, maybe. But it’s almost impossible to foretell a trend as significant as ‘the end of the euro’ based on a single event.

At face value, the rejection of a cabinet minister in Italy should have almost -zero- relevance on economies as large and diversified as the US, China, and Japan.

To me, this is another sign that we’re near the peak of the bubble… and possibly already past it.

Markets are so stretched, and investors are on such pins and needles, that even a minor, insignificant event induces panic.

And it makes me wonder: if financial markets are so tightly wound that something so irrelevant can cause such an enormous impact, how big will the plunge be when something serious happens?

2) It wasn’t just stocks either. Bond markets were also keenly impacted.

Bear in mind that stocks are volatile by nature; prices move much more wildly than other asset classes.

But bonds, on the other hand, are supposed to be safe, stable, boring assets. Especially government bonds in highly developed nations.

In Italy the carnage was obviously the worst.

Investors dumped the 2-year Italian government bond, and yields (which move opposite to prices) surged from 0.9% to 2.4% in a matter of hours.

Simply put, that’s not supposed to happen. And it hadn’t happened in at least three decades.

Again, though, even in the United States, yields on the US 10-year note dropped 16 basis points overnight, from 2.93% to 2.77% (which means US bond prices increased).

That’s considered MAJOR volatility for US government bonds.

To put it in context, the only day over the past few YEARS that saw 10-year yields move more than that was the day after Donald Trump won the US Presidential Election in 2016.

So it was a pretty big deal.

Again, this leads me to wonder: if safe, stable assets like government bonds can react so violently from such an insignificant event, how volatile will riskier assets be when there’s an actual crisis?

Just imagine what’s going to happen to all the garbage assets out there (like unprofitable, heavily indebted businesses) when a real downturn kicks in.

3) Perhaps most importantly, nobody saw this coming.

Even just six months ago, it’s doubtful anyone would have predicted that the rejection of Italy’s finance minister would cause a global financial panic.

And yet it happened.

This is one of the most critical lessons of all: whatever causes the next major downturn can be something completely obscure and unpredictable. And no one realizes it until it’s too late.

Source

from Sovereign Man https://ift.tt/2Jntp66
via IFTTT

Turkish Stocks, Lira Tumble After Erdogan Comments Prompt Capital Control Concerns

Well, that was not supposed to happen…

Turkish stocks are down most in a month and the Lira is tumbling from its dead cat bounce after Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan last night called on Turkish citizens to repatriate assets from abroad… prompting fears that this is pre-empting capital controls that he has previously promised would not occur.

Turkish stocks tumbled back to their lowest since June 2017… with the biggest weekly drop since Nov 2016 (US election)

“The market is coming to realize that the problems are structural and thus interest rate increases aren’t enough to stem the lira decline,” Burak Cetinceker, a fund manager at Strateji Portfoy in Istanbul, said by email.

“Add that elections factor, whose outcome still cannot be easily guessed; and you get a market that is all in jittery mode.”

And the bounce in Lira is fading fast for the second day, trimming the biggest weekly gain in nine months (after a desperate 300bps rate-hike)…

The lira’s slide on Thursday was due to “various speculations,” including one about a possible rating downgrade, but those losses are extending today following Erdogan’s demands that Turks “teach a lesson” to foreigners trying to shake the Turkish economy.

“Let’s teach a lesson to those who are trying to shake the economy and stability through foreign currency,” Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan says late Thursday as he calls on all Turkish citizens to bring assets from abroad and convert their FX deposits to lira, according to state-run Anadolu Agency.

Erdogan, speaking during a rally in southeastern Malatya ahead of parliamentary and presidential elections on June 24, calls on Turks to benefit from regulations easing tax on assets brought from abroad.

However, his comments have been construed as potentially signaling pre-emptive repatriation ahead of capital controls.

“The lira is not out of the woods,” analysts including Tatha Ghose at Commerzbank AG in London wrote in a note. “If the central bank were to skip a rate hike on June 7 simply because temporary calm happens to prevail at the time, that would be confirmation that, despite the assurances, the central bank’s ‘behind-the-curve’ style has not changed.”

As Bloomberg reports, data due Monday will show consumer-price increases quickened to 12.15 percent in May, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg survey, approaching a 14-year high of 13 percent reached last year. While the central bank is said to be prepared to raise interest rates again if inflation picks up pace, analysts at Capital Economics in London say it will likely to stay on hold at the next meeting on June 7.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2kFmp6s Tyler Durden

Futures, European Stocks Surge Celebrating New Spanish, Italian Governments As Payrolls Loom

New Italian government? Check. New Spanish government? Check. Trade war between the US and Europe, Mexico and Canada? Check. Deutsche Bank downgraded to a B-handle? Check. All these potentially risky events have happened in just the past few hours, yet global stock markets couldn’t care less, and together with US equity futures are a sea of green this morning, heading for a positive end to a volatile, tumultuous week in which political developments in Europe and escalating trade tensions roiled markets, only to get a happy ending, even as the all important payrolls report looms, which is expected to show payrolls rising and the unemployment rate holding at the lowest since 2000, suggesting continued tightening by the Fed.

As Bloomberg notes, the (surprisingly) strong positive reaction in European equity markets is the main focus this morning despite the sharp escalation in the global trade dispute

Instead, what traders appear more focused on is the formation of the new Italian government, whose finmin is perceived, perhaps erroneously, as a quasi technocrat despite the clearly Euroskeptic views posted on his blog. For now, however, the Italian FTSE MIB is higher by 2.8%, rallying the most since the end of February and recouping much of its losses for the week as populist parties surged to power, bringing to an end a three-month political deadlock though opening the way to a period of friction with Europe

… while BTPs have rallied in relief at formation of new govt, with the 2Y Italian yield back under 1%…

…. while the Italian-German spread is back to just above 200bps, with Italy’s bank sector rallying heavily.

On Friday, Spain also got a new government when Socialist leader Sanchez becomes PM after lawmakers voted Rajoy out of office. The vote was 180 to 169 with the passing of the vote very much expected. Prior to this Rajoy  accepted his defeat and said that Sanchez is set to be the new PM. Spanish assets rallied after Rajoy’s ouster, opening the way for Socialist leader Pedro Sanchez to take over, and sending 2Y Spanish yields sharply lower.

And yet, as Bloomberg’s Heather Burke notes, despite today’s relief rally, “traders are still bracing for long-term downside, with the cost of bearish versus bullish options based on the index’s three-month 90%/110% skew still near a one-year high.” As a result a return to the 8 1/2-year high for Italian stocks seen in May could prove tough:

Even if an outright euro exit is a low-probability risk, the prospective Italian government could run into tensions with the bloc down the road. Political developments are also still playing out in neighboring Spain, while global trade relations may be souring again. With investors still clearly jittery, there’s plenty of room for risk sentiment to pull back.

Meanwhile, over in Germany as noted earlier, Deutsche Bank stock was unimpressed by the S&P downgrade to BBB+ due to the CEO’s reassuring (repeat) report on liquidity position, with the stock rebounding from yesterday’s all time low…

… even if the CDS is far less convinced that all is well, as DB’s default risk is by far the highest of all major banks.


So as a result of all the various resolutions, even if they were not what one would call “bullish”, the Stoxx Europe 600 index is headed for its biggest gain in a month, led by banks and basic-resources stocks, while S&P equity-index futures pointed to a higher U.S. open.

The risk-on mood prevailed despite President Trump’s launch of tariffs on imports from key trading partners. According to Bloomberg, investors remain optimistic that threats of more international tariffs will not materialize into an all-out trade war between the U.S. and its key partners, while the latest developments in Italy and Spain also removed uncertainty, providing some well-needed relief within Europe

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks traded mixed amid trade war concerns following the US announcement to impose steel and aluminium tariffs on EU, Canada and Mexico, which in turn triggered threats of retaliation against the US. In addition, a slight miss on Chinese Caixin Manufacturing PMI data and looming US NFP jobs data have added to the tentative tone. ASX 200 (-0.4%) was led lower by financials with ANZ Bank pressured on cartel allegation charges related to a share sale in 2015 and as the energy sector also suffered from weakness in crude prices, while Nikkei 225 (+0.1%) shrugged off its opening losses on favourable currency moves. Hang Seng (-0.1%) and Shanghai Comp. (-0.5%) were indecisive and swung between gains and losses as participants digested a range of factors including weaker than expected Caixin Manufacturing PMI data and a firm net liquidity injection of CNY 410bln for the week, as well as the debut of China A-shares in the MSCI Emerging Market benchmark index.

Meanwhile, the TSY curve is marginally steeper as futures edge lower, tracking move in bunds, pushing the 10Y TSY yielld to 2.89% this morning. German bunds led a drop in core European debt as the flight to safety reversed, while peripheral bonds such as Italy’s and Spain’s gained.

Despite the ongoing political risks in the euroarea and the revival of trade-war fears, the currency market was just as blaze as European stocks, and is trading with its familiar pre-payrolls bias, one with relatively low volumes and tight trading ranges:

  • The dollar traded mixed versus Group-of-10 peers as the market entered a consolidation mode ahead of the U.S. data later today and with Scandinavian currencies benefiting from the improvement of market sentiment
  • The euro reversed modest gains made in Asia as Italy prepared to form a populist government while BTPs climbed for the third day, extending a relief rally
  • The yen slid against all G-10 peers and USD/JPY climbed to a high of 109.29 after a brief selloff following a cut in the Bank of Japan’s bond purchases
  • The Aussie declined amid an escalation of global trade tensions after the U.S. slapped metal tariff
  • TRY heavily offered and the Borsa Istanbul 100 Index tumbled after tanking on Thursday by the most in a month, after Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called last night on Turkish citizens to repatriate assets from abroad.

In overnight central bank news, Fed’s Bullard (Non-Voter, Dove) reiterates already at a neutral rate, adds appropriate for Fed to hedge views on rate hikes and that inflation would have surprise to the upside for rate hikes.

As reported yesterday, at the stroke of midnight, US metal tariff exemptions for EU, Canada and Mexico expired overnight which sees US’ closest allies to be subject to 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminium heading into the US. Elsewhere, there were also comments from President Trump that the US will agree to a fair NAFTA deal or no deal at all.

In geopolitics, North Korean leader Kim said their will for denuclearization of the peninsula is unchanged, consistent and fixed, while he hopes that North Korea and US ties will be solved step by step and added North Korea has agreed to a summit with Russia. North and South Korea have agreed to meet on June 14th for military talks.

In commodities, oil is up on the day heading into the weekend with both WTI and Brent up modestly on the day after touching lows in late US trade. This comes after bearish signals in products within the DoE data discounted a wider than expected crude draw. A broader risk averse tone spurred on by trade concerns is dampening prices slightly, however. Gold is lacklustre with the yellow metal essentially flat on the day with traders holding fire ahead of US jobs data. Steel has extended its climb to hit multi-month highs, with aluminium also rising slightly on the day amid the imposition and retaliation of tariffs, as well as continually declining steel stockpiles.

Bulletin Headline Summary from RanSquawk

  • Italian assets seeing significant positivity as government edges closer
  • Spanish PM Rajoy ousted as Socialist Sanchez takes power
  • Looking ahead, highlights include, US NFP, ISM mfg, Baker Hughes and Fed’s Kashkari

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures up 0.4% to 2,715.50
  • STOXX Europe 600 up 0.9% to 386.40
  • MXAP down 0.01% to 172.15
  • MXAPJ up 0.2% to 563.45
  • Nikkei down 0.1% to 22,171.35
  • Topix up 0.1% to 1,749.17
  • Hang Seng Index up 0.08% to 30,492.91
  • Shanghai Composite down 0.7% to 3,075.14
  • Sensex down 0.08% to 35,294.06
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 down 0.4% to 5,990.39
  • Kospi up 0.7% to 2,438.96
  • Brent futures up 0.4% to $77.87/bbl
  • Gold spot little changed at $1,299.28
  • U.S. Dollar Index up 0.1% to 94.08
  • German 10Y yield rose 3.4 bps to 0.375%
  • Euro down 0.04% to $1.1688
  • Italian 10Y yield fell 12.0 bps to 2.526%
  • Spanish 10Y yield fell 4.1 bps to 1.462%

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • President Donald Trump on Thursday night warned Canada that any renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement must be “a fair deal, or there will be no deal at all”
  • EU’s Mogherini: EU will defend its interests; EU response to tariffs will be reasonable and WTO compliant
  • Italy’s populist Five Star Movement and League parties prepared to sweep to power with a program for fiscal expansion that poses a challenge to European rules. Giuseppe Conte, 53, a law professor with no political experience, will be sworn in as prime minister along with his cabinet at 4 p.m. local time on Friday by President Sergio Mattarella
  • U.S.-North Korean talks over a possible summit in Singapore shift to the White House on Friday, where President Donald Trump will host a top aide to Kim Jong Un
  • European May Manufacturing PMIs: Spain 53.4 vs 54.0 est; Italy 52.7 vs 53.0 est; France 54.4 vs 55.1 est; Germany 56.9 vs 56.8 est; Eurozone 55.5 vs 55.5 est; U.K. 54.4 vs 53..5 est.
  • Spain: Rajoy concedes defeat ahead of no-confidence vote in Spanish parliament; says Sanchez will become new PM; later officially confirmed in full vote
  • Deutsche Bank downgraded one notch to BBB+ by S&P; CEO Sewing reaffirms bank’s financial strength is beyond doubt; ECB supervisors see capital and liquidity positions as good, according to people familiar: Reuters
  • BOJ cuts purchases in 5-10y bucket by 20b to 430b yen in regular rinban operation
  • Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy was ousted by a no- confidence vote on Friday. Socialist leader Pedro Sanchez is due to be sworn in as premier by King Felipe in the coming days.
  • The U.S. has opened a criminal investigation into whether traders manipulated prices in the $550 billion market for corporate bonds issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to people familiar with the matter.
  • The recent volatility in markets has sparked a rebound in trading revenue for global banks, as clients turn their attention to risks such as Italy’s political crisis and step up their hedging, a BNP Paribas SA executive said.
  • U.K. manufacturing growth unexpectedly quickened in May as firms worked through backlogs and built up their inventories; IHS Markit’s PMI for the industry rose to 54.4 in May, up from 53.9 in April and beating economists’ estimates for a drop.

Asian markets traded mixed after trade war concerns resurfaced following the US announcement to impose steel and aluminium tariffs on EU, Canada and Mexico, which in turn triggered threats of retaliation against the US. In addition, a slight miss on Chinese Caixin Manufacturing PMI data and looming US NFP jobs data have added to the tentative tone. ASX 200 (-0.4%) was led lower by financials with ANZ Bank pressured on cartel allegation charges related to a share sale in 2015 and as the energy sector also suffered from weakness in crude prices, while Nikkei 225 (+0.1%) shrugged off its opening losses on favourable currency moves. Hang Seng (-0.1%) and Shanghai Comp. (-0.5%) were indecisive and swung between gains and losses as participants digested a range of factors including weaker than expected Caixin Manufacturing PMI data and a firm net liquidity injection of CNY 410bln for the week, as well as the debut of China A-shares in the MSCI Emerging Market benchmark index. Finally, 10yr JGBs were lower after the BoJ reduced purchases of 5yr-10yr maturities in its Rinban announcement which saw a breakdown of near-term support at 150.94, while price action was also consistent with a recovery in Tokyo stocks and US yields. Chinese Caixin Manufacturing PMI (May) 51.1 vs. Exp. 51.2 (Prev. 51.1). PBoC injected CNY 40bln via 7-day reverse repos, CNY 10bln via 14-day reverse repos and CNY 30bln via 28-day reverse repos, for a net weekly injection of CNY 410bln vs. last week’s CNY 30bln net drain.

Top Asian News

  • China’s Oceanwide Said to Explore Property Sales for Cash
  • Chinese Stocks Decline as MSCI Inclusion Fails to Lift Sentiment
  • Some Turks Fear Culture Clash With Erdogan Is About to Get Worse
  • SoftBank CEO Adds Driverless Tech to 300-Year Plan With GM Deal
  • Singapore’s Biggest Property Broker Is Said to Prepare IPO

European equities bounced back from yesterday’s losses (Eurostoxx 50 +1.1%) with all the major bourses firmly in the green. Italy’s FTSE MIB (+2.8%) is outperforming its counterparts amid a coalition deal revival by the Italian populist parties. As a result, Italian banks are leading the gains with the Italian Bank Index higher by over 5%. Across the continent, Spain’s IBEX (+1.7%) is showing a solid performance while the country’s PM Rajoy accepts his defeat and says opposition Sanchez is set to be the PM. Elsewhere, Deutsche Bank (+3.0%) tries to nurture yesterday’s wounds (shares dropped to record lows after US subsidiaries were added to a federal problem bank list) after ECB sources reassures investors that the bank now has a tighter management team, good liquidity and capital. Finally, Dialog Semiconductors (-14.9%) is the most noticeable mover in the Stoxx 600 after a revenue warning amid tech giant Apple building their own chips.

Top European News

  • U.K. Manufacturing Growth Picks Up in ‘Unconvincing’ Rebound
  • Italy Bonds Gain as Populists Take Power But Skepticism Lingers
  • A $2 Billion Setback Leaves Genmab CEO Undeterred on Pipeline
  • Euro-Area Manufacturing Growth Slows to 15-Month Low in May
  • World Cup Fever Is Coming as Traders Seek Market Mayhem Rescue

In FX, the DXY index is straddling 94.000 ahead of today’s US jobs data amidst relatively narrow bands for most  Dollar/G10 pairings, bar Usd/JPY that has broken above 109.00 and into a firmer trading range amidst a broad improvement in risk sentiment on Italian political grounds over heightened global trade tensions. However, Jpy bears and Greenback bulls may encounter more offers at 109.50 and some technical resistance ahead of the 30 DMA around 109.56. CAD A partial recovery for the Loonie after Thursday’s post-Canadian GDP data dive, with Usd/Cad retreating from circa 1.3000 to sub1.2950, and perhaps acknowledging retaliatory action against US steel and aluminium tariffs rather than dwelling on NAFTA deal prospects that look more remote. AUD Another relative underperformer despite exemptions from the aforementioned US import taxes, with 0.7600 still proving to be a formidable chart hurdle to overcome convincingly and a softer Caixin Chinese manufacturing PMI also undermining the Aud. TRY The Lira is lagging other EMs and not deriving any support from latest CBRT operations, as Usd/Try rebounds back above 4.6000
in wake of a further/faster contraction in Turkey’s manufacturing PMI.

In commodities, oil is up on the day heading into the weekend with both WTI and Brent up modestly on the day after touching lows in late US trade. This comes after bearish signals in products within the DoE data discounted a wider than expected crude draw. A broader risk averse tone spurred on by trade concerns is dampening prices slightly, however. Gold is lacklustre with the yellow metal essentially flat on the day with traders holding fire ahead of US jobs data. Steel has extended its climb to hit multi-month highs, with aluminium also rising slightly on the day amid the imposition and retaliation of tariffs, as well as continually declining steel stockpiles.

Looking at the day ahead, there will be the May employment report due in 1:30pm BST including nonfarm payrolls (190k expected), unemployment rate and the all important average hourly earnings (2.6% yoy expected). The final manufacturing PMI for May, April construction spending and May’s ISM manufacturing prints are also due in the US. Elsewhere, the US automakers’ May sales figures are also due. Finally, US Commerce Secretary Ross is travelling to China this weekend for another round of trade talks

US Event Calendar

  • 8:30am: Change in Nonfarm Payrolls, est. 190,000, prior 164,000
    • Unemployment Rate, est. 3.9%, prior 3.9%
    • Average Hourly Earnings MoM, est. 0.2%, prior 0.1%
    • Average Hourly Earnings YoY, est. 2.6%, prior 2.6%
    • Average Weekly Hours All Employees, est. 34.5, prior 34.5
    • Labor Force Participation Rate, prior 62.8%
  • 9:45am: Markit US Manufacturing PMI, est. 56.6, prior 56.6
  • 10am: Construction Spending MoM, est. 0.8%, prior -1.7%
  • 10am: ISM Manufacturing, est. 58.2, prior 57.3
  • Wards Total Vehicle Sales, est. 16.7m, prior 17.1m

 

 

 

via RSS https://ift.tt/2H7LyQ9 Tyler Durden

Spanish Prime Minister Rajoy Ousted From Power

As was widely expected, this morning Mariano Rajoy’s six year reign as Spain’s prime minister, ended when he become the first prime minister in Spain’s democratic history to be ousted by parliament after losing a vote of no-confidence amid a corruption scandal engulfing his Popular party. He will be replaced by the Socialist opposition leader Pedro Sánchez.

A small but sufficient majority of Spanish lawmakers was sufficient to end Rajoy’s career, voting 180 to 169 to remove the prime minister, cutting short the second term of one of Europe’s longest-serving leaders currently in power. The center-left Socialist Party had called the no-confidence vote last week and proposed its leader to replace Mr. Rajoy.

Rajoy takes his seat at Parliament before the vote of a no confidence motion in Madrid, June 1. Photo: Reuters

Quoted by the FT, in his brief final speech to parliament, Rajoy bade farewell to the country after seven years in power: “It has been an honour to leave Spain better than I found it. Thank you to all Spaniards and good luck.” The speech came after a last meal of sorts:

Mr Rajoy spent eight hours in a Madrid restaurant on Thursday afternoon instead of sitting through the first part of the parliamentary debate, but appeared composed on Friday during his resignation speech.

Socialist Party leader Pedro Sánchez, who becomes prime minister immediately, told lawmakers that his policy goals include bolstering social policies to address problems such as unemployment and poverty levels, both of which remain high despite Spain’s strong growth. Among Sanchez’ challenges will be managing the eurozone’s fourth-largest economy and dealing with internal problems such as the crisis in Catalonia.

The new socialist prime minister will lead a weak minority government with just 84 seats in parliament, part of a coalition that includes a “hodgepodge” of different political parties, including the far-left Podemos group and a string of regional national parties including the Basque Nationalist party and two Catalan nationalist parties; this suggests a tumultuous time is in store for Spain both before and after the upcoming elections.  Indeed, as the WSJ notes,  the new premier’s minority government will struggle to pass legislation and has already promised to call parliamentary elections ahead of the current 2020 deadline.

The leader of the liberal Ciudadanos party, Albert Rivera, labelled this a “Frankenstein government” due to its lack of unifying views. The Catalans want full independence from Spain, for instance.

* * *

Rajoy’s ouster comes just as an antiestablishment government comes to power in Italy, now home to Western Europe’s largest anti-establishment movement, after a three-month power vacuum.

Paradoxically, coming at a time when Europe is supposedly “growing” and following several years of ECB QE meant to stabilize Europe, the two high-profile political crises this week in southern Europe underscore the social and economic scars still borne by the region years after the eurozone’s 2011-12 crisis, damage that is feeding political discontent and stirring hunger for change.

Rajoy had seen his support steadily erode since he became prime minister in 2011 and began to enact a series of painful economic reforms during the eurozone crisis. He has shouldered much of the political blame for a recovery that has left millions of Spaniards behind. He is the first Spanish prime minister to be unseated in a vote of confidence.

That is not to say he didn’t bring it on himself: after numerous lawsuits and years of corruption allegations against Rajoy’s Popular Party came to a head last week when a top Spanish court ruled that his party financially benefited from an illegal kickback scheme. The party has said it would appeal the ruling.  Rajoy hasn’t been charged and denies knowledge of the scheme, however if recent events in other developing nations such as Malaysia are an indication, the public will demand a fall guy, and it may be only a matter of time before Rajoy finds himself behind bars.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2JmA7Jr Tyler Durden

S&P Downgrades Deutsche Bank To BBB+

Adding insult to ruinous injury, just hours after Deutsche Bank stock crashed to all time lows after it was revealed that it had been put on the Fed’s “secret” probation list one year ago, overnight S&P downgraded Deutsche Bank’s credit rating by one notch to BBB+ from A-, just three away from junk, citing “significant execution risks in the delivery of the updated strategy amid a continued unhelpful market backdrop” adding that “relative to peers, Deutsche Bank will remain a negative outlier for some time.”

S&P had initiated the credit review on April 12, shortly after the Christian Sewing was appointed new CEO, replacing John Cryan, saying repeated leadership changes pose questions over its long-term direction, against a background of chronically low profitability.

In its statement (see below), S&P said that “Deutsche Bank’s updated strategy envisages a deeper restructuring of the business model than we previously expected” and that while management is taking “tough actions to cut the cost base
and refocus the business in order to address the bank’s currently weak profitability” the bank “appears set for a period of sustained underperformance compared with peers, many of whom have now finished restructuring.”

The good news is that S&P said the rating outlook is stable, reflecting its view that management will “execute its strategy in earnest and, over time, will show progress against its 2019 financial objectives and so achieve its longer-term objective of a more stable and better-functioning business model.”

To be sure, the bank’s first sub-A rating will likely raise its cost of debt even further, adding to the pressure already suffered by its bonds in the recent selloff and increases the stakes for new CEO Christian Sewing, who replaced John Cryan in April with a mandate to accelerate the bank’s restructuring while refocusing on Deutsche Bank’s European home European market. S&P had initiated its review after Sewing’s appointment, saying repeated leadership changes pose questions over its long-term direction, against a background of chronically low profitability.

Forced to defend itself twice in two days, Sewing, in a letter to staff following the downgrade, said that the bank’s financial strength is “beyond doubt,” though it has to deliver on its strategy “speedily and rigorously.” In the Corporate & Investment Bank “we have a clear strategic direction and we’re well on the way to implementing what we recently announced.”  On Thursday, the bank sent out a similar statement after its stock crashed to all time lows, assuring investors that “Deutsche Bank AG, is very well capitalized and has significant liquidity reserves.

In a separate blow, Bloomberg reported that Deutsche Bank faces cartel charges over its role as underwriter for a A$2.5 billion ($1.9 billion) share sale by Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. in 2015. Citigroup Inc. also faces the same charges.

Meanwhile, also overnight Reuters reported that the ECB saw Deutsche Bank’s liquidity as being at a good level and the lender has made significant progress regarding its responses to any concerns of the ECB supervisors, Reuters reported, citing an unidentified person familiar with the ECB’s view.

“This is nothing that keeps us awake at night,” Deutsche Bank spokesman Joerg Eigendorf said about the ratings downgrade. “We have refinanced ourselves this year at quite or very good conditions, so that’s not a worry at all for us. And we are able to react if necessary.”

* * *

Looking at the stock reaction, it appears that the downgrade may have been priced in, as DB stock was 3.5% higher this morning trading a €9.48, and rebounding from an all time low hit on Thursday.

Credit traders were less convinced that the worst has passed, with DB CDS jumping as the cost of insuring against a default in Deutsche Bank’s senior debt, jumped to 179 basis points on Friday, from just above 70 at the beginning of the year. By comparison, the spreads for BNP Paribas and Barclays, two of its biggest regional rivals, were 53 and 104 basis points respectively.

The full flow-through of the downgrade remains to be seen, with Goldman arguing in a recent report that losing the A- rating at S&P could cost the bank dearly.

Further counterparty aversion could follow in the event of a downgrade, especially with those clients that have ‘automatic rating triggers’ within their risk policies,” Goldman’s Jernej Omahen wrote. That in turn may hurt Deutsche Bank’s market share further and weaken the company’s ability to generate revenue, the analysts argued according to Bloomberg.

S&P’s downgrade brings its rating more closely into line with that of rivals Moody’s Investor Service. Moody’s long-term senior unsecured debt rating for Deutsche Bank is Baa2. At the time of Sewing’s appointment, Moody’s had affirmed all of its ratings on Deutsche Bank’s debt, but had changed the rating on its A3 deposit and senior debt ratings to negative, from stable.

* * *

The full text of the S&P downgrade is below.

Deutsche Bank Long-Term Rating Lowered To ‘BBB+’ On Elevated Strategy Execution Risks; Outlook Stable

  • On May 24, Deutsche Bank announced further details of its planned multi-year restructuring, focusing notably on its U.S. equities sales and trading business.
  • We consider that management is taking tough actions to cut the cost base and refocus the business in order to address the bank’s currently weak profitability.
  • However, we see significant execution risks in the delivery of the updated strategy amid a continued unhelpful market backdrop, and we think that, relative to peers, Deutsche Bank will remain a negative outlier for some time.
  • We are lowering to ‘BBB+’ from ‘A-‘ our long-term issuer credit rating on Deutsche Bank and its core operating subsidiaries.
  • We are affirming our ratings on Deutsche Bank’s subordinated debt issues, including our ‘BBB-‘ rating on its senior subordinated (also known as senior non-preferred) instruments.
  • The stable outlook reflects our view that management will execute its strategy in earnest and, over time, will show progress against its 2019 financial objectives and so achieve its longer-term objective of a more stable and better-functioning business model. Our central scenario assumes that cost-cutting measures will be tailored and targeted  enough to preserve the bank’s capital markets franchise, in particular in Europe, and avoid substantial revenue loss.

LONDON (S&P Global Ratings) June 1, 2018–S&P Global Ratings today lowered its long-term issuer credit ratings (ICR) on Deutsche Bank AG and its core subsidiaries to ‘BBB+’ from ‘A-‘. The outlook is stable.

We removed the ratings from CreditWatch negative.

At the same time, we affirmed our ‘A-2’ short-term ICRs and our ‘trAAA/A-1’ Turkish national scale ratings on Deutsche Bank. We also affirmed our issue credit ratings on all the hybrid instruments issued or guaranteed by the bank, including our ‘BBB-‘ rating on the bank’s senior subordinated debt
instruments.

The lowering of our long-term issuer credit rating reflects that Deutsche Bank’s updated strategy envisages a deeper restructuring of the business model than we previously expected, with associated non-negligible execution risks. While we consider management is taking tough, although likely inevitable, actions and proposes a logical strategy to successfully restore the bank to more solid, sustainable profitability over the medium to long term, the bank appears set for a period of sustained underperformance compared with peers, many of whom have now finished restructuring. Over the coming 18 months, we will look in particular for robust delivery against 2019 objectives, such as the €22 billion cost target, and evidence that the bank retains the solid support of its clients, something that would help underpin the revenue base in the CIB division amid a period of downsizing. While we regard capital markets earnings as inherently more volatile than retail and commercial banking, we consider a well-balanced blend of profitable businesses to be supportive of the bank’s creditworthiness. Therefore the bank’s ability to preserve its global capital  markets franchise, focused in particular on Europe, underpins our stable outlook.

Our removal of the CreditWatch follows a three-month period during which Deutsche Bank has been under intense scrutiny, which culminated in it parting company with former CEO John Cryan (on April 8). Then, new CEO Christian Sewing delivered a high-level communication of the updated strategy on April 26, with further elaboration on May 24, and ultimately won shareholder support for that strategy at the annual general meeting the same day. This is the latest iteration in the bank’s longer-term restructuring story that started under John Cryan in 2015 and which has already yielded some key actions to strengthen the bank. This includes the rundown and divestment of noncore assets and businesses, a substantial capital raising, and an operational overhaul to reduce complexity and control risk and improve efficiency. The gradual resolution of outstanding litigations has reduced some earnings-event risk, but so far management has not delivered any marked upturn in financial performance, which remains burdened by a high cost base.

By 2021, the bank targets a sustainable revenue share of approximately 50% from the Private & Commercial Bank and the DWS asset management business. Adding the revenues of Global Transaction Banking, the share of more stable revenues would be around 65%, which we view positively, especially compared with Deutsche Bank’s historical earnings dependence on more volatile markets businesses. Likely coinciding with this, management targets a post-tax return on tangible equity (ROTE) of about 10% in a normalized operating environment–that is, assuming a modest rise in central bank base interest rates and moderately higher market volatility and activity after the nadir of 2017. Aside from one-off restructuring costs of up to €800 million in 2018, the Management Board has committed to keep the adjusted cost base at €23 billion for 2018 and bring it to €22 billion by 2019. The execution of the strategy notably includes:

In the Personal and Commercial Banking (PCB) division:

  • The delivery of the planned cost efficiency program following the May 25 legal merger of the group’s two principal domestic markets subsidiaries–Deutsche Postbank AG and Deutsche Bank Privat- und Geschäftskunden AG–into DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG, the largest private and commercial bank in Germany.
  • Seeking more revenue growth in Germany, something that depends in large part on eventual central bank interest rate rises, and in markets like Italy and Spain.
  • Ensuring that the above actions and investment in digital transformation bring the cost-to-income ratio of this business to 65% by 2022.

In the Corporate & Investment Bank (CIB) division:

  • A sharp focusing of activities and resources on its European and multinational clients and the products that are most relevant for them.
  • Refocusing cash equities on electronic trade execution solutions, growing structured product capabilities in equity derivatives, and refocusing resources on key clients in prime finance.
  • Scaling back other areas where Deutsche Bank no longer has a competitive advantage in the changed market environment, such as U.S. rates sales and trading.
  • Shrinking the balance sheet, notably via a €100 billion cut in leverage exposure (around 10% of the group’s exposure at March 2018).

We believe that management is taking decisive actions to address the fundamental cost issue the bank has, notably in some market segments. We expect management will also pursue broader efficiency measures to delayer management structures, to remove duplication and overlaps, and to increase the speed of decision making. The accelerated cost reduction that the steps above imply will see group headcount fall to well below 90,000 from 97,000.

Our use of the negative peer adjustment notch reflects our view that relativities with ‘A’ rated peers became too strained and are unlikely to move back into line quickly. Notably, while much of the heavy-lifting should be completed  in 2018, Deutsche Bank’s restructuring will likely only start bearing fruit in 2019, and only fully by 2021. By contrast, key peers such as Barclays, Commerzbank, Credit Suisse, and the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) have now worked through their restructuring and business model optimization and are already starting to see improved performance.

That said, we continue to be broadly supportive of the strategy. We expect the planned refinements to optimize the CIB division around its strongest franchises and anticipate that a well-performing, more efficient CIB division will  ultimately support Deutsche Bank’s creditworthiness. In PCB, the size of the domestic franchise is clear, but we consider it critical that these efficiencies deliver, with the Asset Management division, the solid base of predictable profitability that we observe among major European peers. The unchanged ‘bbb’ stand-alone credit profile (SACP) remains underpinned by the actions that management took in 2017 to strengthen the balance sheet (in terms of capitalization, liquidity, and asset quality). These actions gave the bank good solvency and liquidity buffers and restored investors’ confidence, which in our view helps the new management to deliver its strategy. While litigation risks remain–the main outstanding case, in our view, is a U.S. Department of Justice investigation into mirror trades in Russian equities–we see them as having reduced significantly and are no longer a material downside risk.

We anticipate that Deutsche Bank’s profitability in the second quarter of 2018 could be muted given flat period-to-date market conditions, with only a very low single-digit return on equity for the full year 2018. Depending in part on market conditions and activity, we expect that profitability will improve in 2019 as the benefits of strategic execution emerge, leading to a mid-single-digit ROTE. We assume that asset quality will remain robust, and liquidity buffers strong. We estimate the bank’s capitalization measured under our risk-adjusted capital (RAC) methodology to have been close to 10.0% at end-2017, but we expect this to decline to 9.0%-9.5% during 2018/2019. The bank reported a fully-loaded Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 13.4% at March 2018, down from 14.0% at end-2017.

On April 19, 2018, we published new criteria for assigning resolution counterparty ratings (RCRs) to certain financial institutions. We consider that there is an effective resolution regime in Germany, and that an RCR may be relevant to Deutsche Bank under these criteria. In coming weeks, we will review our analysis of the resolution regime across 26 countries, including Germany. This review will identify liability categories, if any, that are protected from default risk by structural or operational features of a given resolution framework. Upon completion of this review, we may assign  RCRs under our new criteria to banks located in Germany, including Deutsche Bank.

The stable outlook acknowledges the continued execution risks inherent in Deutsche Bank’s restructuring, but reflects our view that the refreshed management team has the backing of the Supervisory Board, is pressing ahead in earnest, and has taken decisive actions to help the bank deliver more solid and more sustainable returns. Still, we will continue to observe how the execution of this strategy unfolds and to what extent the franchise of Deutsche Bank, and its earning generation capacity, has been damaged or not by the management changes and restructuring. Over the coming 18 months, we will look in particular for robust delivery against 2019 objectives, such as the €22 billion cost target, a meaningful improvement in reported ROTE, and evidence the bank has retained the solid support of its clients, something that would help underpin the revenue base in the CIB division amid a period of substantial downsizing. 

We could lower our long-term issuer credit rating on the bank if we see setbacks in the delivery of the updated strategy or signs that 2019 financial objectives could materially slip, leading to a stalling of improving profitability. This would be consistent with a view that, notwithstanding Deutsche Bank’s position as a leading European bank, the business stability that comes with an end to restructuring and delivery of satisfactory financial performance is likely to remain elusive, and also that its franchise and competitive position have weakened. In this scenario, we would very likely revise down the ‘bbb’ SACP, and so lower our issue credit ratings on all rated debt, including the senior subordinated debt and regulatory capital instruments.

An upgrade is unlikely in the coming 18 months because we expect the financial benefits of strategic execution in 2018 to become more evident only in 2019 and to represent progress in the ongoing journey rather than its conclusion. Still, we could upgrade the bank once we gain greater confidence in Deutsche Bank’s execution such that it appears well set to achieve a more stable and predictable business model, thereby narrowing the gap with its global peers in terms of revenue generation and cost control. We would likely make this revision by removing the notch of adjustment to the issuer credit rating. It would therefore affect only the senior (preferred) debt, not our ratings on the senior subordinated debt and regulatory capital instruments.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2H9r6y4 Tyler Durden

After Italy… Spain Risk Soars

Authored by Daniel Lacalle via DLacalle.com,

Political risk in Europe was largely ignored in international markets because of the mirage of the so-called ‘Macron effect’, the ECB’s massive quantitative easing program, and a perception that everything was different this time in Europe added to the illusion of growth and stability.

However, a storm was brewing and the same old problems seen throughout the years in Europe were increasing.

In Italy, the shock came with an election that brought a coalition of extreme left and extreme right populists. Disillusion with the Euro was evident in Italy for years, as the economy continued to be in stagnation while debt soared. However, international bodies, mainstream analysts, and banks preferred to ignore the risk, instead continuing to announce impossible growth estimates for the following year and science-fiction banks’ profitability improvements.

Italy’s economic problems are self-inflicted, not due to the Euro. Governments of all ideologies have consistently promoted inefficient dinosaur “national champions” and state-owned semi-ministerial corporations at the expense of small and medium enterprises, competitiveness and growth, labor market rigidities created high unemployment, while banks were incentivized to lend to obsolete and indebted state-owned companies in their disastrous empire-building acquisitions, inefficient municipalities, as well as finance bloated local and national government spending. This led to the highest Non-Performing Loan figure in Europe.

Now, the new government wants to solve a problem of high government intervention with more government intervention. The measures outlined would imply an additional deficit of some €130bn by 2020 and shoot the 2020 Deficit/GDP to 8%, according to Fidentiis.

Italy’s large debt and non-performing loans can create a much bigger problem than Greece for the EU. Because this time, the ECB has no tools to manage it. With liquidity at all-time highs and bond yields at all-time lows, there is nothing that can be done from a monetary policy perspective to contain a political crisis.

In Spain, something similar happened.

The Spanish recovery from the worst crisis in decades was impressive and an example for other European countries, but weak and fragile. Spain recovered more than half of the jobs lost during a crisis and slashed deficit by half. Exports rose to 33% of GDP.

However, large imbalances continued to build.

Spain, like Italy, France and Portugal, saw a rising populist wave and, in typical European Union fashion, decided to combat populism by increasing spending and adding public sector imbalances. By doing so, Spain, like Italy, did not stop the populist demands.

However, growth was impressive. In 2018, despite an evident slowdown of the Eurozone, Spain showed a 3% annualized growth in the first quarter. The reason for the difference in performance of Spain relative to other neighboring countries was a very ambitious set of structural reforms. But they came at a cost, as we have seen in many other countries where tough decisions had to be made, and the government lost an absolute majority in the past elections. Now, internal forces put the recovery in danger and threaten the economy again.

The excuse for a vote of no-confidence came from recent corruption cases that have affected the Popular Party, mainly the so-called Gurtel scandal of illegal financing, but any discernable investor knows this is pure political tactic, because the alternative parties are also involved in very relevant corruption cases. All these cases come from the past. From the housing bubble at the beginning of the 2000s (PSOE has the unemployment fraud in Andalucia and the Catalan separatists the embezzlement scandal called “the 3%” because of the bribes requested for public contracts).

The main risk in Spain is very similar to Italy. A weak minority government led by parties that demand massive government spending and more entitlements with larger deficits, could be in power at a crucial time for Spain. When the tailwind of massive liquidity injections and low rates from the ECB ends, Spain will have refinancing requirements that exceed €300 billion per annum before 2022. In 2018, 41.2 billion euro, in 2019, 82.4, in 2020 83.9 and in 2021 58.5 billion euro, with 60.4 billion maturing in 2022.

Italy finds itself in a similar situation, with 84 billion euro maturities in 2018, 161 billion in 2019, 164 billion in 2020 and 172.5 billion euro in 2021.

It is not just a case of sovereign borrowing. The economies, like in 2010-2011, suffer dramatically when borrowing costs rise… And the Credit Default Swap of Italy and Spain have risen dramatically. Spain’s 10-year sovereign bond Credit Default Swap has almost doubled in the five days since the vote of no confidence was announced.

Spain needs to make an adjustment of 15 billion euro in 2018 to meet its commitments with Brussels, and the risk to the economy is that the budget bets the entire deficit reduction on higher tax revenues from stronger growth. That is why markets are so concerned. Spain is a very cyclical economy and the wrong policies can send the country to recession very quickly, as we saw in 2008-2010. However, in 2010 debt was much lower and rates were higher, so there was some fiscal space once the ECB started to lower interest rates… Unfortunately, like Italy, France and Portugal, Spain abandoned its reform agenda to bet it all on monetary policy when the conservative government lost absolute majority.

Now that the tide is turning and the placebo effect of the ECB’s quantitative easing is disappearing, we are seeing a very evident slowdown in the European economy, and Spain’s main trading partners are Eurozone countries, which could damage exports. But we are also witnessing the sudden stop in emerging markets like Brazil or Argentina, and the external sector also depends strongly on exports to these countries.

The likely coalition of Socialists, communists and separatists is aiming to unwind the labor market reform, which is likely to hurt job creation in a country with 15% unemployment where rigid labor laws have made it have an average of 17% unemployment since 1980. Additionally, as we have seen in so many European countries, they want to increase spending massively for entitlements and “relax” deficit targets, i.e. borrow more. The economic programs announced promise up to €60 billion more spending with €47 billion more revenues from raising taxes. The latter will not be achieved, and the former will be overspent, as always.

Like in Italy, the risk is that none of these parties talk of breaking the euro or defaulting now, but most of them have signed in Brussels requests for mechanisms for “orderly exit”. Obviously, with monster debt and massive imbalances, orderly exit is an oxymoron.

The risk of default is currently kept low by the massive quantitative easing of the ECB, but at some point Germany and other countries are going to say “enough is enough”.

Obviously, populists in Spain, like Italy, blame it all on “austerity”. With government spending 13% higher than in 2007, and public spending to GDP at almost 40%, calling the current situation austerity would be a joke if it was not so serious.

Why is there a risk on corporates and the overall economy? In Spain and Italy the real economy is extremely dependent on banks. While in the US banks finance less than 20% of the real economy, in the European Union it is more than 80%. Banks, at the same time, are extremely dependent on sovereign risk. Not just due to their holdings of sovereign bonds, but because of massive lending to local, regional and state administrations. This makes SMEs and families very exposed to sovereign risk.

The main German, French and Spanish banks hold very significant amounts of Italian debt.  Italian banks, €118.76 billion, French ones, €44.27 billion, Spanish financial entities, €28.75 billion and German ones, €24.06 billion.

The Financial systems of Italy, Spain, Portugal and Germany are the largest holders of their countries’ sovereign bonds, at 18%, 13%, 11% and 10% of total assets respectively. Many investors believe that the European Central Bank is going to solve this whole problem monetizing excess deficits and spending. The main problem is that this is the recipe for a Japan-style stagnation process. The central bank cannot print growth.

Analysts ignore the demographics risk in Europe, the excessive spending in entitlements and the constant crowding out of the public sector against the private sector.

The problem in Spain and Italy is not the Euro or the financial markets. It is the continuous, relentless policies of subsidizing the unproductive and the public sector at the expense of the high productivity sectors and taxpayers.

A coalition of socialists, populists and separatists in Spain would not only demolish the reforms that have helped the recovery, it would immediately destroy credit confidence by demanding more wasteful spend and more entitlements while promising a deficit improvement that never arrives through giant tax increases.  These parties want to “recover” the policies that existed before the crisis. The ones that destroyed 3.5 million jobs with the largest stimulus package ever applied in Spain (almost 30% of GDP deficit spending).

The risks in Europe are being underestimated, and the only thing I hear all the time as a bullish argument is “the ECB will monetize it”. Careful what you wish for. The best outcome is a Japan-style stagnation. The worst, back to 2011.

* * *

This was originally published as a Hedgeye Guest Contributor note.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2kEIAcV Tyler Durden

“Here To Stay” – Assad Declares It’s The Americans Who Must Leave Syria

Even the Washington Post now admits that Assad is “here to stay” —“The writing is now indisputably on the wall: The Syrian regime is going nowhere.”

In a newly published wide ranging sit-down interview with RT journalist Murad Gazdiev in Damascus, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad revealed his perspective of major recent events which have prolonged the war and taken it to new dangerous levels of escalation, including the Douma chemical attack claims in April and Russia’s thwarting the West’s objective of regime change.

“They told a story, they told a lie, and the public opinion around the world and in the West didn’t buy their story, but they couldn’t withdraw. So, they had to do something, even on a smaller scale,” Assad said of the April 14th massive airstrikes on Syria carried out by the US, UK, France, and Israel after videos purporting to show victims of a chlorine gas attack were released by the Saudi-financed Jaish al-Islam and the White Helmets.

The Washington Post featured the above image in an op-ed this week titled: “The world learns to live with Assad in Syria.”

Assad appeared to be indirectly referencing the stream of skeptical reporting which began emerging once Western correspondents physically entered the attack site for the first time, notably veteran Middle East reporter Robert Fisk among them, who stunned his British and world audience in concluding, “they were not gassed.” There were also skeptical television reports in American and European media by journalists walking around Douma.

Of Douma in particular, supposedly gassed by the Syrian Army in the very moments it stood poised to liberate the last 5% of East Ghouta, Assad questioned, “Is it in our interest? Why, and why now?” Assad noted that each time his forces were closest to achieving overwhelming battlefield victory, a major and inexplicable provocation happened to sway international opinion.

He said further that despite continued US interference, especially in Syria’s northeast, Damascus has nearly won the seven-year war with Russian military support, which thwarted Western attempts of an Iraq-style military intervention: “With every move forward for the Syrian Army, and for the political process, and for the whole situation, our enemies and our opponents, mainly the West led by the United States and their puppets in Europe and in our region, they try to make it farther – either by supporting more terrorism, bringing more terrorists to Syria, or by hindering the political process,” Assad told RT.

And of the April 14th US coalition attack, he explained that Russia’s presence kept it to a limited, largely symbolic strike on alleged weapons production facilities: “The Russians announced publicly that they are going to destroy the bases that are going to be used to launch missiles, and our information – we don’t have evidence, we only have information, and that information is credible information – that they were thinking about a comprehensive attack all over Syria [speaking of the Russian response], and that’s why the threat pushed the West to make it on a much smaller scale.”

Assad did not downplay the potential for the outbreak of wider regional war after multiple clashes with the West: “We were close to having direct conflict between the Russian forces and the American forces, and fortunately, it has been avoided, not by the wisdom of the American leadership, but by the wisdom of the Russian leadership,” he said, and added, “We need the Russian support, but we need at the same time to avoid the American foolishness in order to be able to stabilize our country.” Assad further thanked Russia for carefully avoiding unnecessary escalation with the “foolish” US.

While denouncing the US as supporting terrorists that war against the state, Assad refused to mount personal attacks against Trump or other Western leaders. Gazdiev asked him if he had an epithet for Trump in return while referencing the US president’s recent “animal Assad” comments: “This is not my language, so I cannot use similar language. This is his language; it represents him,” the Syrian president stated. “I think there is a very known principle that what you say is what you are. So, he wanted to represent what he is and that’s normal,” he added.

Assad showed himself willing to take a pragmatic approach in dealing with the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), supported by 2000 or more US troops currently occupying parts of northeast Syria. He said Washington has generally long be in the process of “losing its cards” in Syria and can be brought to the negotiating table. “Our challenge is how can we close this gap between their plans and our plans,” he said of Washington and its military advisers in Syria.

He explained further of the US trained and equipped SDF: “We’re going to deal with it by two options: the first one we started now opening doors for negotiations, because the majority of them [SDF] are Syrians. Supposedly they like their country, they don’t like to be puppets to any foreigners,” Assad said. “If not, we’re going to resort … to liberating those areas by force. It’s our land, it’s our right, and it’s our duty to liberate it, and the Americans should leave. Somehow they’re going to leave,” he added.

However, this explanation didn’t stop the Associated Press from immediately misrepresenting this portion of the interview, headlining its story “Syria’s Assad threatens force against US-backed Kurds.” RT interviewer Murad Gazdiev, who heard Assad’s words firsthand, said of the AP’s claim, “Misleading, if not outright fake news. Assad said he has begun negotiating with Kurds and prefers reuniting Syria peacefully. But if there are those who don’t want to negotiate, he will use force.”

Though he seems convinced that the great power confrontation over Syria is now winding down, the threat of terrorism will perpetuate, despite the ongoing Russia-Turkey-Iran brokered Astana talks which have sought to reach out to select anti-Assad groups.

Assad explained his goal is to expel all terrorists and restore order: “Factions like Al-Qaeda, like ISIS, like Al-Nusra, and the like-minded groups, they’re not ready for any dialogue, they don’t have any political plan; they only have this dark ideological plan, which is to be like any Al-Qaeda-controlled area anywhere in this world. So, the only option to deal with those factions is force.”

“The more escalation we have, the more determined we’ll be to solve the problem, because you don’t have any other choice; either you have a country or you don’t have a country,” the Syrian president told RT.

Ironically, prior US government official threat assessment studies seem to be in agreement that Damascus has fundamentally faced a largely al-Qaeda fueled foreign terrorist insurgency over these past years of war.

The US State Department’s own 2014 Country Report on Terrorism confirms that the rate of foreign terrorist entry into Syria over the past years has been unprecedented among any conflict in history:

“The rate of foreign terrorist fighter travel to Syria — totaling more than 16,000 foreign terrorist fighters from more than 90 countries as of late December — exceeded the rate of foreign terrorist fighters who traveled to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, or Somalia at any point in the last 20 years.

And these figures were merely from the 2014 report, and likely reflect lower estimated numbers than the reality.

But regardless of what some analysts have described as Syria’s “endless insurgency” problem, we actually find ourselves in rare agreement with the Washington Post, that Assad is most certainly “here to stay” (it must have pained WaPo greatly to have to write those words). He has clearly long outlasted nearly each and every political leader in the West who once called for his ouster.

via RSS https://ift.tt/2HadCCm Tyler Durden

Brickbat: Tennessee Two-Step

SWAT teamDrug Enforcement Administration agents and members of the Bradley County, Tennessee, SWAT team knocked down the door to Spencer Renck’s home and tossed several flash bang-bang grenades, including one thrown into the room his young son was in. They tackled Renck to the ground, handcuffed him and arrested him. Minutes later, they figured out they were in the wrong home. Renck says officers told him they made the mistake because he has a white car like the man they were looking for.

from Hit & Run https://ift.tt/2so61LQ
via IFTTT