Goldman Previews Japan's QE Moar: "BOJ Could Purchases Outright Equities"

Two days ago, when we posted “”Frustrated” Liquidity Addicts Demand Moar From BOJ As Nikkei Rally Stalls“, we suggested that more QE from the Bank of Japan is just around the corner (and likely to take place as early as April) as the only real “driver” behind Abenomics, the surge in the stock market had stalled for nearly 6 months. 48 hours later, and 700 points in the Nikkei higher, the realization that indeed more QE is coming has swept through the market like wildfire. So what will the Bank of Japan’s expansion of quantitative easing look like, when supposedly only $75 billion per month amounting to a whopping 70% of all new issuance, is not enough? According to Goldman “the BoJ could take the lead in this reallocation process by notably increasing its purchases of risky assets, such as ETFs and RIETS, or even outright equities – say purchasing a wide range of Japanese equities by index weight.” It may get even better: “the BoJ is likely to consider more unorthodox policy to push up inflation expectations” – like paradropping NGDP, better known as paradropping yen (a move Yellen herself is now contemplating as we previewed back in September).

The full Goldman note:

The first arrow –namely, bold monetary easing to dispel deflation – is likely to be loosed again in the April-June quarter 2014 (most likely April-end) for several reasons. First, to offset some of the negative impacts of the consumption tax hike to be implemented April 2014. Second, by next spring, inflationary pressures are likely to dissipate (due to base effects and more subdued commodity prices). Therefore, the BoJ is likely to feel compelled to act in order to reach the 2% inflation target that was adopted in January 2013. Judging by the survey of long-term inflation expectations for Japan as published by Consensus Economics, there is broad scepticism that the BoJ will hit its inflation target in 2015 as intended. Indeed, the survey does not envisage inflation anywhere near 2% even by 2023. Consequently, further easing is also likely to be required to lift inflation expectations and reinforce the BoJ’s commitment to reaching the target.

 

In our discussions with clients, many also expect the BoJ to ease next April, but there seems to be little agreement on what policies the BoJ will implement. The BoJ could buy more and longer dated JGBs, but given that the Bank already buys 70% of all new issuance, increasing such purchases may be met with scepticism and a concern that the BoJ is monetising government debt. However, such a move may stimulate quicker portfolio allocation into risky assets, which is only happening very slowly, as reported in the BoJ’s Financial System Report.

 

Alternatively, the BoJ could take the lead in this reallocation process by notably increasing its purchases of risky assets, such as ETFs and RIETS, or even outright equities – say purchasing a wide range of Japanese equities by index weight. We are also watching to see if the BoJ is likely to consider more unorthodox policy to push up inflation expectations. More conventionally, the Bank may confirm that QQE is to be open-ended.

And where the Japanese unprecedented monetary policy experiment boldly goes, the Fed is sure to follow.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/yjBiuHMMnS8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Goldman Previews Japan’s QE Moar: “BOJ Could Purchases Outright Equities”

Two days ago, when we posted “”Frustrated” Liquidity Addicts Demand Moar From BOJ As Nikkei Rally Stalls“, we suggested that more QE from the Bank of Japan is just around the corner (and likely to take place as early as April) as the only real “driver” behind Abenomics, the surge in the stock market had stalled for nearly 6 months. 48 hours later, and 700 points in the Nikkei higher, the realization that indeed more QE is coming has swept through the market like wildfire. So what will the Bank of Japan’s expansion of quantitative easing look like, when supposedly only $75 billion per month amounting to a whopping 70% of all new issuance, is not enough? According to Goldman “the BoJ could take the lead in this reallocation process by notably increasing its purchases of risky assets, such as ETFs and RIETS, or even outright equities – say purchasing a wide range of Japanese equities by index weight.” It may get even better: “the BoJ is likely to consider more unorthodox policy to push up inflation expectations” – like paradropping NGDP, better known as paradropping yen (a move Yellen herself is now contemplating as we previewed back in September).

The full Goldman note:

The first arrow –namely, bold monetary easing to dispel deflation – is likely to be loosed again in the April-June quarter 2014 (most likely April-end) for several reasons. First, to offset some of the negative impacts of the consumption tax hike to be implemented April 2014. Second, by next spring, inflationary pressures are likely to dissipate (due to base effects and more subdued commodity prices). Therefore, the BoJ is likely to feel compelled to act in order to reach the 2% inflation target that was adopted in January 2013. Judging by the survey of long-term inflation expectations for Japan as published by Consensus Economics, there is broad scepticism that the BoJ will hit its inflation target in 2015 as intended. Indeed, the survey does not envisage inflation anywhere near 2% even by 2023. Consequently, further easing is also likely to be required to lift inflation expectations and reinforce the BoJ’s commitment to reaching the target.

 

In our discussions with clients, many also expect the BoJ to ease next April, but there seems to be little agreement on what policies the BoJ will implement. The BoJ could buy more and longer dated JGBs, but given that the Bank already buys 70% of all new issuance, increasing such purchases may be met with scepticism and a concern that the BoJ is monetising government debt. However, such a move may stimulate quicker portfolio allocation into risky assets, which is only happening very slowly, as reported in the BoJ’s Financial System Report.

 

Alternatively, the BoJ could take the lead in this reallocation process by notably increasing its purchases of risky assets, such as ETFs and RIETS, or even outright equities – say purchasing a wide range of Japanese equities by index weight. We are also watching to see if the BoJ is likely to consider more unorthodox policy to push up inflation expectations. More conventionally, the Bank may confirm that QQE is to be open-ended.

And where the Japanese unprecedented monetary policy experiment boldly goes, the Fed is sure to follow.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/yjBiuHMMnS8/story01.htm Tyler Durden

ATF Tests 3D-Printed Guns, Finds They Go "Bang"

3D-printed Liberator handgunPerhaps a little late to the game, the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has joined its
counterparts in
Austria, Germany, and elsewhere
in purchasing 3D printers to
see what this fuss about what Reason’s Brian Doherty calls
the
unstoppable plastic gun
” is about. Like everybody else, the
folks at the all-you-need-is-a band-and-it’s-a-party agency
discovered that 3D-printed guns do, in fact, go bang, though
whether they do so in the intended way depends on the material you
use to build them.

The ATF chose the Liberator, the first successfully fired model,
to test. Innovators have since moved on to
rifles
,
pepperboxes
,
semiautomatics
, and even a
Model 1911 printed from stainless steel
.

Videos posted online on the ATF’s YouTube channel (yes, really)
show a Liberator built from ABS plastic firing without drama, while
a model printed in translucent VisiJet
shatters in spectacular fashion
. (Pro tip: Don’t use VisiJet
when printing your own gun.)

A helpful
fact sheet
posted online promises that “ATF makes every effort
to keep abreast of novel firearms technology and firearms
trafficking schemes.” It also outlines the strict regulations
governing firearms manufacture and sale and vows that “ATF
investigates any cases in which technological advances allow
individuals to avoid complying with these laws.”

Of course, the whole advantage of 3D printing technology, and
other innovations that enable DIY manufacture of restricted and
forbidden objects, is that they render the law largely
unenforceable, since the activity takes place away from officious
eyes. You can put any statute you want on the books, but there’s
not much you can do to regulate what goes on in home workshops.

Which is why the Department of Homeland Security has
pronounced 3D-printed guns “impossible” to control
.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/15/atf-tests-3d-printed-guns-finds-they-go
via IFTTT

ATF Tests 3D-Printed Guns, Finds They Go “Bang”

3D-printed Liberator handgunPerhaps a little late to the game, the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has joined its
counterparts in
Austria, Germany, and elsewhere
in purchasing 3D printers to
see what this fuss about what Reason’s Brian Doherty calls
the
unstoppable plastic gun
” is about. Like everybody else, the
folks at the all-you-need-is-a band-and-it’s-a-party agency
discovered that 3D-printed guns do, in fact, go bang, though
whether they do so in the intended way depends on the material you
use to build them.

The ATF chose the Liberator, the first successfully fired model,
to test. Innovators have since moved on to
rifles
,
pepperboxes
,
semiautomatics
, and even a
Model 1911 printed from stainless steel
.

Videos posted online on the ATF’s YouTube channel (yes, really)
show a Liberator built from ABS plastic firing without drama, while
a model printed in translucent VisiJet
shatters in spectacular fashion
. (Pro tip: Don’t use VisiJet
when printing your own gun.)

A helpful
fact sheet
posted online promises that “ATF makes every effort
to keep abreast of novel firearms technology and firearms
trafficking schemes.” It also outlines the strict regulations
governing firearms manufacture and sale and vows that “ATF
investigates any cases in which technological advances allow
individuals to avoid complying with these laws.”

Of course, the whole advantage of 3D printing technology, and
other innovations that enable DIY manufacture of restricted and
forbidden objects, is that they render the law largely
unenforceable, since the activity takes place away from officious
eyes. You can put any statute you want on the books, but there’s
not much you can do to regulate what goes on in home workshops.

Which is why the Department of Homeland Security has
pronounced 3D-printed guns “impossible” to control
.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/15/atf-tests-3d-printed-guns-finds-they-go
via IFTTT

Alec Baldwin Condemns "Libertarian Trash" Who Are "Defenders of Gay Rights"


The latest rampage by rageaholic – and ultra-talented, btw –
actor Alec Baldwin is on display at TMZ.com (click above to watch).
After winning a case against a stalker,
Baldwin saw fit to scream at and threaten a shutterbug on the
streets of New York.

During the episode, Baldwin refers to the photographer as a
“cocksucking fag,” an insult that calls to mind a previous incident
in which the 30 Rock alum and current MSNBC host
threatened to foot-fuck
a “toxic little queen” and “a toxic
little bitch” who had libeled his wife.

While giving no quarter to what he sees as invasive
photographers, Baldwin has checked in with advisers and
concludes

This tweet came just hours after Baldwin had tweeted
Anti-gay
slurs are wrong. They not only offend, but threaten hard fought
tolerance of LGBT rights
.”

And not long after Baldwin had tweeted (and duly deleted) this
slag on “libertarian trash” who defend gays:


I can’t speak for the Breitbart crowd (though Andrew Breitbart
was certainly a staunch supporter of gay
equality
) but the “libertarian trash” at Reason has been
defending gay rights since the magazine’s earliest days in the late
1960s. In fact, when mainstream liberal and conservative
publications were still arguing over whether homosexuality should
be decriminalized, we were already talking about marriage equality.
If the state is going to involve itself in marriage (and it
shouldn’t) among consenting adults, it should not draw invidious
distinctions and treat some people as second-class citizens.

I’d like to think that Alec Baldwin can understand that about
“libertarian trash.” But if his now-you-see-it, now-you-don’t
Twitter feed is any indication, he’s already on to more important
topics, such as conflating “single-bullet theorists” with
minimum-wage flat-earthers:

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/15/alec-baldwin-condemns-libertarian-trash
via IFTTT

Alec Baldwin Condemns “Libertarian Trash” Who Are “Defenders of Gay Rights”


The latest rampage by rageaholic – and ultra-talented, btw –
actor Alec Baldwin is on display at TMZ.com (click above to watch).
After winning a case against a stalker,
Baldwin saw fit to scream at and threaten a shutterbug on the
streets of New York.

During the episode, Baldwin refers to the photographer as a
“cocksucking fag,” an insult that calls to mind a previous incident
in which the 30 Rock alum and current MSNBC host
threatened to foot-fuck
a “toxic little queen” and “a toxic
little bitch” who had libeled his wife.

While giving no quarter to what he sees as invasive
photographers, Baldwin has checked in with advisers and
concludes

This tweet came just hours after Baldwin had tweeted
Anti-gay
slurs are wrong. They not only offend, but threaten hard fought
tolerance of LGBT rights
.”

And not long after Baldwin had tweeted (and duly deleted) this
slag on “libertarian trash” who defend gays:


I can’t speak for the Breitbart crowd (though Andrew Breitbart
was certainly a staunch supporter of gay
equality
) but the “libertarian trash” at Reason has been
defending gay rights since the magazine’s earliest days in the late
1960s. In fact, when mainstream liberal and conservative
publications were still arguing over whether homosexuality should
be decriminalized, we were already talking about marriage equality.
If the state is going to involve itself in marriage (and it
shouldn’t) among consenting adults, it should not draw invidious
distinctions and treat some people as second-class citizens.

I’d like to think that Alec Baldwin can understand that about
“libertarian trash.” But if his now-you-see-it, now-you-don’t
Twitter feed is any indication, he’s already on to more important
topics, such as conflating “single-bullet theorists” with
minimum-wage flat-earthers:

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/15/alec-baldwin-condemns-libertarian-trash
via IFTTT

A.M. Links: Republicans Introduce Resolution To Impeach Holder, FBI To Focus Less on Al Qaeda and More on Cyberterrorism, Michele Bachmann Claims She Lost Health Insurance Because of Obamacare

  • A group of House Republicans introduced a
    resolution to impeach
    Attorney General Eric Holder. They cited
    scandals such as the “Fast and Furious” gun running operation as
    proof of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
  • FBI Director Jim Comey testified yesterday that the US is
    more vulnerable
    to cyberattacks
     than terrorists groups like Al Qaeda.
    Don’t worry, though, he assured that law enforcement and national
    intelligence are shifting their focus to the web to keep us
    safe.
  • Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) says that she
    lost her health insurance
    because of Obamacare and that she
    refuses to use the exchange website until it’s fixed.
  • The House votes today on a GOP-backed bill to allow insurance
    companies to continue to
    offer their existing plans
    under Obamacare.
  • Alleged crack-smoking Toronto Mayor Rob Ford is apparently

    getting his own television show
  • Norway will
    promote new legislation
    to “regulate ritual circumcision,” the
    country’s health minister said.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7
content 
widgets for your
websites.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter,
and don’t forget to
 sign
up
 for Reason’s daily updates for more
content.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/15/am-links-republicans-introduce-resolutio
via IFTTT

Kurt Loder Reviews Nebraska and Charlie Countryman

Bruce Dern gives a brave and unfaltering
performance in Nebraska, the new movie by Alexander
Payne, according to Kurt Loder. Dern has already won the best-actor
award at this year’s Cannes Film Festival, and now his portrayal of
an old man sinking into the confusion of senile dementia is being
touted for an Oscar. This possibility has a sentimental attraction.
On the other hand, Charlie Countryman isn’t a bad
movie; in Loder’s opinion, it’s a movie of jaw-dropping
awfulness.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/15/kurt-loder-reviews-nebraska-and-charlie
via IFTTT

Empire Manufacturing Collapses To Lowest Since January

The headline Empire manufacturing data missed expectations by the most since January (the 4th month in a row) and plunged to its lowest since January. Across the board sub-indices collapsed (every one of them) into contraction with shipments down from over 13 to -0.5, and New Orders down from 7.75 to -5.5. “Hope” didn’t save it this time either as the outlook droped to 3 month lows. Labor market conditions were subdued. The index for number of employees drifted downward for a third consecutive month, coming in at 0.0 in November in a sign that employment levels were flat (falling at fastest rate in 2013). The average workweek index fell nine points to -5.3, pointing to a decline in hours worked. This can only be great news for the bulls and guarantees that the S&P 500 will hit 1800 today

 

 

Chart: Bloomberg


    

via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/0DaCIX5B0-g/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Sky-High Taxes and NIMBY Regulations: How Pot Legalization is Losing in Colorado and Washington

My latest column for
The Daily Beast
looks at pot legalization developments in
Colorado and Washington state. Voters in both places overwhelmingly
approved recreational use of marijuana last year. In January, both
states will implement insanely high taxes on weed and, in Colorado
at least, all manner of bans on which counties and cities can sell
pot.

The spirit behind the legalization efforts in both states was
that marijuana should be treated in a “manner similar
to alcohol.

Unfortunately, it’s starting to look like both states are going
to treat pot in a manner similar to alcohol during
Prohibition
. Not only are pot taxes likely to be sky high,
various sorts of restrictions on pot shops may well make it easier
to buy, sell, and use black-market marijuana rather than the legal
variety. That’s a bummer all around: States and municipalities will
collect less revenue than expected, law-abiding residents will
effectively be denied access to pot, and the crime, corruption, and
violence that inevitably surrounds black markets will continue
apace.


Read the whole thing
.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/15/sky-high-taxes-and-nimby-regulations-how
via IFTTT