Foreign Central Banks Are Quietly Scooping Up US Treasurys

Back in February, we wrote that over half a year after we first reported last August that foreign official institutions – central banks, sovereign wealth funds and reserve managers – are liquidating US Treasurys in record amounts, a process that only accelerated into year end when official entities sold a record $405 billion in US paper in the LTM period, Bloomberg decided to catch up to the topic with “America’s Biggest Creditors Dump Treasuries in Warning to Trump.”

However, by then Bloomberg’s report was no longer factual or accurate, because while the 2 month delayed TIC data still showed declines (mostly due to MTM changes in Treasurys amounts), the far more concurrent weekly report of Treasurys held in custody at the Fed showed a substantial rebound in foreign holdings of US Treasurys. And a quick look at the latest Fed data shows that the urgency by foreign central banks to snap up US paper has only grown in the past three months.

As the latest custody data from the Fed reveals, in 2017, debt held at the Fed on behalf of foreign central banks has jumped by $61.2 billion to $2.922 trillion, the highest level since June 2016.

One of the biggest buyers has, perhaps surprisingly, been China – the second largest foreign holder of US paper after Japan – which after selling $188 billion in Treasurys in 2016 has bought $29 billion YTD according to the latest TIC data. A main driver behind this mini buying spree is that the relentless Chinese reserve outflow, which started in late 2014 and continued for over 2 years, has moderated after the PBOC erected an unprecedented firewall to contain capital inside the country, and which has removed the pressure on the PBOC to liquidate US-denominated assets to offset the capital outflows.

As the WSJ observes, China’s foreign reserves slid more than $500 billion between August 2015—when China shocked the world with a one-time devaluation of the yuan—and December 2016. The reserves have since rebounded from $3.01 trillion in December to $3.03 trillion in April. The slowdown in reserve outflows has also afforded the Chinese Yuan with a period of surprising stability, which has been cited by some as the reason why emerging markets have remained very stable in light of the recent geopolitical and commodity volatility.

Another factor was the strength of the dollar. as the recent reversal in the greenback has helped fuel central-bank buying of Treasurys. The strengthening USD from mid-2014 until the end of 2016 created a “negative feedback loop in emerging markets, with capital leaving developing economies, which then caused local currencies to tumble.”

The weaker dollar in 2017 has also helped stabilize local EM currencies and reduced the need for central banks to sell Treasurys and use the open-market proceeds to intervene in the currency market.

Through Wednesday, the dollar had fallen 1.4% this year against the Chinese yuan freely traded in the offshore markets, after a 6% rally in 2016. And while the Yuan was barely changed the day of the Moody’s downgrade, on Thursday Yuan, both the onshore and offshore, surged by the most in 2 months after at least two Chinese banks sold dollars in the onshore market, in what traders dubbed was a direct manipulation of the currency by Beijing, as the PBOC’s daily fixings had “materially diverged” from the prescribed formula resulting in a gap between the reference rate and currency’s spot value. And according to Khoon Goh of Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, instead of sticking to fixing formula, the central bank opted for active intervention to narrow the difference.

But back to Treasury flows, where in addition to China other foreign central banks have been bidding up US paper as it continues to offer more attractive yields compared with peers in Germany, Japan and the U.K. During the first quarter, Saudi Arabia’s Treasury holdings rose $11.6 billion. Russia’s holdings rose $13.7 billion, South Korea’s was up $4.2 billion and Singapore’s was up $2.5 billion. Even Japan, which earlier this year dumped the most US Treasurys since May of 2013 is back in the fray, only this time it is no longer hedging its dollar exposure, a decision which may prove painful once currency volatility returns.

A further reason for the return of foreign buyers is that after dropping at the start of the year, the price of 10Y TSYs has rebounded sharply, making the purchase a safer proposition. Purchases from foreign central banks had contributed to declines in Treasury yields this year after a big rise in late 2016. That in turn has caused hedge funds and money managers to exit from or pare back bets that bond yields would extend a climb.

This  process is now in reverse, just as the Fed is warning of not only a June rate hike but potentially unwinding its balance sheet as soon as September.

“There are not a lot of options for foreign central banks’’ to diversify their portfolios away from the Treasury bond market, said Bill Northey, chief investment officer at the private client group of U.S. Bank.

Separately, as the WSJ adds, global foreign reserves excluding gold have stabilized. The amount was $10.9 trillion at the end of March, up from $10.8 trillion at the end of December, according to IMF data. Echoing what we said in February, analysts quoted by the WSJ said it was premature to worry about selling Treasurys by the central banks. But should the dollar resume its appreciation, or should Trump’s fiscal reform re-emerge, pressure may mount for central banks to sell Treasurys to defend local currencies.

There is also the question of China’s capital account firewall: “The wild card is the dollar,’’ said Alejandra Grindal, senior international economist at Ned Davis Research. “Whether the stabilization will continue depends on if the dollar strengthens significantly and how well China manages its outflows and its communication about yuan policy.”

To be sure, should enterprising Chinese oligarchs (i.e., buyers of Vancouver, Toronto and other assorted housing) find another way to bypass China’s draconian capital controls, we will revert right back to square one and the selling will resume.

via http://ift.tt/2r0Gdn4 Tyler Durden

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.