Is This Why The Fed Is Raising Rates???

Authored by Chris Hamilton via Econimica blog,

As the Fed is in the midst of a rate hike cycle, it seems important to remember why this cycle is like no previous rate hike cycle.  The mechanics of this hiking cycle are completely unique and experimental…thus the outcome is far more of an unknown than "normal".

Why?  In a typical cycle, the Fed would sell a relatively small portion of its assets…er, balance sheet (typically short duration bills and notes) to banks.  This would withdraw some of banks liquid funds (replacing them with less liquid assets) and create "tightness".  This tightness would push overnight lending rates higher and the daisy chain of rising rates would work its way through from the shortest eventually all the way to the 30yr Treasury bonds.

However, this time, nothing like that is happening.  This is because the Fed sold all its short term notes/bills (in Operation Twist) and bought longer duration MBS (mortgage backed securities) and longer duration Treasuries in Quantitative Easing to the tune of $4.5 trillion.  Further, since the Fed bought most of these assets from large banks, these banks held much of the proceeds from these sales at the FRB (Federal Reserve Bank).  For the Fed to perform typical rate hikes, it would need to remove most of the $2.1 trillion banks are now sitting on in excess reserves @ the FRB…likely creating a crisis in the process.  Conversely, if the Fed can't contain the $2.1 trillion at the FRB, and the reserves are leveraged into the market…stand back in awe of the mother of all bubbles. 

Thus, the Fed has instead determined to raise rates via paying banks interest on these excess reserves to  maintain the reserves at the Federal Reserve.  In short, pay banks not to lend money, not to invest the reserves.  This is just like Federal programs that paid farmers not to farm…IOER (interest on excess reserves) pays big bankers not to bank.

Since the end of QE in late 2014, the Federal Reserve has continued to buy bonds with the intent of maintaining a consistent quantity of assets on its balance sheet.  But interestingly, banks excess reserves have been declining, by as much as $800 billion since late 2014 (chart below).  Apparently, during this Fed balance sheet maintenance phase (as the Fed continues to buy assets from the banks to maintain its balance sheet) banks aren't doing their part and have been unwilling to retain these proceeds as excess reserves.

And a close up of the above chart from 2014 to present (chart below).  Since the end of QE, $800 billion previously held in excess reserves found its way into loans and/or markets!!!  Considering that much or even the majority of the excess reserves are held by foreign banks, it seems more likely the newly liberated cash would find its way into financial assets.  Even conservatively leveraged, that's an awful lot of money (not so conservatively leveraged, it's a big deal)!

Excess reserves held at the Fed declined by almost $800 billion from the end of QE until the Fed began it's more recent set of rate hikes (from 0.5% to 1.25%)…but behold, excess reserves have responded by increasing almost $200 billion (chart below) since the recent set of rate hikes.

Excess reserves held at the FRB appear to have responded to the ramping IOER…just as the Fed intended (chart below)!?!

And paying those banks not to lend or invest those trillions of dollars is about to get very expensive…the 2018 number simply assumes the Fed gets all the way to 3% (potentially choking real world economic activity in order to pay banks to not blow the greatest bubble of all time?!?).  That would be $64 billion annually paid to the largest (primarily foreign) banks for doing nothing, taking no risks, and lending no money.

Otherwise, as the Fed continues reinvesting its maturing balance sheet, banks will continue to pour liquidity into the real world (primarily financial assets) rather than holding the proceeds at the FRB…pushing assets further into orbit. 

With an asset bubble already of epic proportions (detailed HERE and HERE), the only means to corral the excess reserves appears to be continually raising the federal funds rate (absent impact on the long end of the curve???) and continually paying the biggest banks more IOER's not to lend money, paying the biggest banks billions more not to invest!?!

In a world where population and economic growth are slowing rapidly (detailed HERE and HERE and HERE), this appears to have been the Feds plan all along?!?

via http://ift.tt/2tu4CEV Tyler Durden

Trump Cannot Help Shooting Himself in the Foot

Could Donny Boo Boo possibly stick his head any farther up his own ass! The clown’s not a checker player playing against chess grandmasters, he’s a fool playing Russian Roulette with a semi-auto instead of a revolver.

Donny just had to watch Morning Joe today, and it got him to Tweeting yet again, like the impulsive child he is. Joe S detailed a story where Joe was informed by senior White House folks that the National Enquirer, the rag run by Donny Boo Boo’s good friend, was going to run a hit piece on Joe and Mika, but if Joe called Trump and apologized for criticizing him, Trump would have the story pulled. Also, Mika’s kids were being harassed by unknown individuals, and as soon as that started is when Joe got the first call from the White House.

Granted this is just alleged, but it will undoubtedly get the attention of Bob Mueller. Mueller can question both parties under oath and find out which one (no doubt Trump) is lying. Mueller has that right to broaden the investigation, just as Ken Starr broadened Whitewater to eventually include a blue dress. Also, though Tweet Boy denied Joe’s allegations, Joe said he has both texts from senior White House officials and phone records.

In addition, Joe detailed a call he got from ‘a long time senior House Republican Rep’ who was at the White House healthcare meeting a few weeks ago. In the meeting, according to this Rep, Trump went into a wild rant about Mika, using his now characteristic ‘blood pouring from everywhere’ meme. The Rep said that in all his time in DC he had never been so scared, as the POTUS was clearly mentally unstable.

The Dems have already introduced a Bill yesterday to invoke Article 4 of the 25th Amendment to remove Trump for reasons of insanity. Some Republicans are quietly joining the debate. Some other Repubs are trying to make a deal with Democrats, saying they will join the Trump removal group if Dems make concessions on the healthcare Bill. Now THAT is dealmaking!

There can be little doubt that Trump is on the edge of a total breakdown. Rats are beginning to desert the sinking ship of fools. Don’t be surprised if some very visible figures walk away over the 4th of July weekend, such as SecState Tillerson. Donny looks like a steaming pile of shit as the pressure is showing on his taut and wan face. If we wake up tomorrow and see Donny had a heart attack, it will not be surprising. It’s not like he’s in any sort of shape. It’s ironic that the bloated asshat is forever criticizing women on their looks, as if his 300 lbs of rancid blubber make him a looker.

Ninety-nine percent, perhaps 100%, of Donny’s woes are of his own making. He never grew up, and in his declining years he may well be losing whatever hold on reality he might have had—and that has always been in question on the best of days. The 140 characters are on the wall, when even his own Party is horsetrading behind his back to rid the United States of the disgrace and embarrassment that is Trump.

via http://ift.tt/2ttppZh chindit13

Bank of America’s Forecast Of When The Fed Will Crash The Market

Earlier today we reported that Bank of America’s chief strategist Michael Harnett made two stunning  (if perfectly obvious) revelations for a person, who stands to potentially lose his job if he dares to publicize the truth, which is precisely what he did when he said that i) “central banks have  exacerbated inequality via Wall St inflation & Main St deflation” and ii) it is “no longer politically acceptable to stoke Wall St bubble; two ways to cure inequality… you can make the poor richer…or you can make the rich poorer…they have failed to boost wage expectations,inflation expectation, “animal spirits” on Main St… so Fed/ECB now tightening to make Wall St poorer”

Some further observations from Harnett’s note “No market for Rich Men”:

Tightening by Fed, rhetorical tightening by ECB has succeeded in raising bond yields, volatility, reducing tech stocks (CCMP, QNET, SOX all at 1-month lows); flow data had indicated tech very overbought (Chart 2– flows into tech annualizing 22% AUM YTD)…

 

 

ripe for correction; EM debt & US/EU corporate bonds other crowded areas…look at surge in inflows to EU credit funds (Chart 3).

 

In other words, having failed at its task of “making the poor richer”, the Fed is now resigned to the upcoming market crash which will make the rich poorer instead.

And here is the clearest signal yet that central banks are about to pull the trapdoor: “central banks in aggregate still printing: bought $350bn in April, $300bn in May, <$100bn in June…big 5 central banks buying less but not yet selling.”

He continues:

Central banks want volatility to return, know financial conditions too easy (Chart 5); yields rise as they carry through on threat (or as ECB shows this week, lose credibility by lame flip-flop on policy intentions as Euro moved toward ECB “pain threshold” – Chart 7); ECB sets interest rate floor and floor now rising.

 

 

Central banks making mistake tightening policy as there is no inflation. Disruption, Demographics, Debt (IIF just announced global debt hit all-time high of $217tn = 327% of global GDP in Q1, up $50tn past decade)…all means normal business upturn cannot create inflation…oil prices poster child for this (we cut oil price forecasts today)…all means the big inflation rotation awaits radical fiscal stimulus, trade war, major increase in geopolitical risk, Occupy Silicon Valley policies (tech taxation, living wages…).

The question then, of course, is when will the Fed crash markets? Here is Hartnett’s take:

We don’t think this is “big top” in stocks;  greed harder to kill than fear; don’t think this “big top” in stocks, would be surprised if bull market which began with SPX 666 ends before 6666 on the Nasdaq… summer 2017 = significant inflection point in central bank liquidity trade…will likely lead to “Humpty-Dumpty” big fall in market in autumn, in our view.

 

But Big Top likely occurs when Peak Liquidity meets Peak Profits. We think that’s an autumn not summer story.

So roughly just under 500 more points on the Nasdaq before the “big fall.”

Finally, some ideas on how to trade it.

Asset allocators should nonetheless start buying vol, reducing exposure to credit, prepare for bout of higher yields

 

Summer trade arguably optionality in tech (uber growth), long banks/energy (uber value), lighten up in credit, EM, add to volatility.

 

Investors anticipating a full reversal of the QE trade would thus position as follows…

  • Long oil, short stocks
  • Long 2-year Treasuries, short EM debt
  • Long TIPS, short HY
  • Long resources, short tech
  • Long utilities/telco, short consumer discretionary
  • Long value, short growth
  • Long Japan & European periphery, short US
  • Long inflation, short deflation

via http://ift.tt/2ttzd5s Tyler Durden

Another CNN Producer Exposed By Project Veritas: American Voters “Are Stupid As Shit”

Content originally published at iBankCoin.com

Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe has just capped off a week of destroying CNN’s last shred of credibility with a Friday morning release of another undercover encounter with an employee of the beleaguered network. Jimmy Carr, a hate-filled Associate Producer, said that virtually everyone he knows at the network – surprise – absolutely hates President Trump.

Carr: “On the inside, we all recognize he is a clown, that he is hilariously unqualified for this, he’s really bad at this and that he does not have America’s best interests. We recognize he’s just f*cking crazy.”

 

“Here’s the deal, this is a man who’s not actually a Republican… He just adopted that because that was the party he thought he could win in. He doesn’t believe anything that these people believe.” 

Carr goes on to rattle off a laundry list of grievances against the President, stating that “90% of us are on board with just the fact that he’s crazy.”

Carr didn’t stop at the President. When asked about the election, the Associate Producer said American voters are “Stupid as shit,” before insulting Kellyanne Conway – a top Trump advisor and the first woman to run a successful Presidential campaign.

Ratings

Carr then echoed what another CNN producer admitted to a Project Veritas operative – it’s all about Ratings.

“It’s decisions made by people higher than me and if they go wow, your ratings are soaring right now, keep up what you’re doing. Well, what we’re doing is Russia, ISIS, London terror, shooting in Chicago, that’s it.

Fake News Bust

O’Keefe also caught CNN selectively editing out a Trump supporter’s answer during an election panel to make him appear stupid when giving an answer to the topic of illegal immigrants voting in the 2016 election.

Entire video:

  

 

Week of horror for CNN

Undercover footage released earlier in the week dealt devastating blows to the credibility-damaged network whose President, Jeff Zucker, may be on the chopping block if a merger between AT&T and CNN parent company Time Warner is approved.

On Monday, Project Veritas released undercover footage of a candid discussion with CNN producer John Bonifield, in which the “Very Fake News” network employee admitted that the whole Russia story against President Trump is a “Mostly B.S.” ratings grab by CNN’s CEO Jeff Zucker.

Bonifield also admitted that he hasn’t seen any evidence of President Trump committing a crime.

But all the nice cutesy little ethics that used to get talked about in journalism school, you’re just like, that’s adorable. That’s adorable. This is a business. –John Bonifield

Then on Wednesday O’Keefe captured footage of CNN host Van Jones saying that the Russia – Trump story is “a big nothing burger.”

 

Van Jones responded with a CNN op-ed, calling the video a hoax and “highly edited right wing propaganda” made by a “con man.”

[F]or those of you unfamiliar with James O’Keefe and his misnamed  “Project Veritas,” here’s a helpful recap: James O’Keefe is a notorious con man whose infamy arises from his addiction to pulling the same media stunts, over and over again. –Van Jones

(Perhaps the Project Veritas operative approached Van Jones off camera to role-play as a conservative for fun?)

White House Endorses

On Tuesday, White House Deputy Press Secretary Sarah H. Sanders encouraged people to watch the O’Keefe video of CNN Producer John Bonifield admitting the Russia story was “Mostly B.S.” pushed by CEO Jeff Zucker for ratings.

 “whether it’s accurate or not, I don’t know – I think if it is accurate, it is a disgrace to all of media, to all of journalism.” –Sarah H. Sanders

Huckabee’s endorsement drew the ire of the MSM, however instead of discussing the content of O’Keefe’s video – pundits like Chuck Todd did a full Exorcist head swivel over the fact that Huckabee hadn’t personally verified each claim in the undercover sting (which CNN confirmed the authenticity of).

Death knell?

Will a cleanout of CEO Jeff Zucker and perhaps a few other sacrificial wolves restore credibility to the news network that’s been faking it for years? I wouldn’t hold my breath as long as guys like James O’Keefe are around to expose the shills.

via http://ift.tt/2urwoPP Tyler Durden

Did Obamacare Really Save Lives?

Authored by Robert Murphy via The Mises Institute,

One of the popular objections to the GOP proposals to reform health insurance markets is that the Affordable Care Act (aka “ObamaCare”) saved thousands of lives per year, and hence that tinkering with ObamaCare will literally kill lots of people. For example, Hillary Clinton tweeted out:

hillarytweet.PNG

Now to be sure, even if the claim were true, it still wouldn’t follow that coercive redistribution of wealth was morally justified. However, as happens so often in political controversies, libertarians don’t have to choose between property rights and tolerating widespread suffering. Believe it or not, the data suggest that if anything, ObamaCare actually caused more Americans to die.

None of what I write in this piece should be construed as an endorsement of the GOP bills. But the claim that they would “kill lots of people” is not valid.

Oren Cass’s Amazing Takedown

The researcher who alerted me to these awkward facts was the Manhattan Institute’s Oren Cass. Cass makes three important points in his recent study:

#1. The various estimates of the alleged lives saved under ObamaCare were not based on actual mortality data. Rather, these pro-ObamaCare studies relied on previous episodes (such as the implementation of “RomneyCare” in Massachusetts) where the expansion of insurance coverage went hand-in-hand with improved health outcomes. Then, taking this correlation as a “fact,” the pro-ObamaCare researchers multiplied by the expansion of insurance under ObamaCare and came up with an estimate of how many Americans’ lives were saved.

Yet as Cass points out, this procedure is flawed. What the literature actually shows is that expansion of private health insurance coverage contributes to improved health outcomes. But under ObamaCare, the amount of private coverage went down relative to what we would have expected in the absence of the legislation. What really drove the increase in insurance coverage under ObamaCare was the expansion of Medicaid. And here, it is much less obvious that this is a boon for health outcomes, as the now infamous Oregon experiment shows.

Looking at the Aggregate Data

#2. Now that we’ve undercut the foundations of the pro-ObamaCare figures, we can turn to the actual mortality data from the U.S. After all, as Cass says, if ObamaCare really has been avoiding tens of thousands of deaths per year, we should see that in the data.

And yet, we see the opposite. Although the ACA passed in 2010, the full expansion of insurance coverage didn’t kick in until 2014. So the relevant metric is to see what happened to (age-adjusted) mortality rates before and after 2014. Lo and behold:

U.S. Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates per 100,000 (Annual, 2002–2015)

Source: CDC WONDER Database

2017.06.27 ACA and Mortality.png

As the figure shows, if we control for the aging of the population, the mortality rate tends to fall over time. However, for whatever reason, after falling in 2014, the mortality jumped back up in 2015, erasing all the gains since 2013.

To see that this isn’t some artifact of this data set, we can cross-reference this information with life expectancy. Some readers may have been aware that researchers were alarmed in late 2016 when the latest figures showed U.S. life expectancy falling “for the first time in decades.”

Looking at the State-Level Data

#3. But now we come to the third and most devastating component of the Cass study. He is intellectually honest and concedes that the uptick in mortality in 2015 could be a fluke, or it could be a genuine problem due to something other than ObamaCare. For example, there is a festering opioid epidemic in many parts of the US, so perhaps it was just bad luck (for Obama’s legacy) that this public health crisis happened to hit right when his signature legislature fully kicked in.

Yet Cass points out that we still have a pretty good control group to assess the specific impact of the Affordable Care Act’s boost to coverage. Specifically, only 31 states (plus DC) expanded Medicaid under the ACA, while the other 19 states rejected the offer. So if it’s true that the ACA really did “save lives” relative to what otherwise would have happened, but that the absolute mortality rate in the US went up because of some external problem (like the opioid crisis), then we should still expect see mortality rates jumping more in the “red” states that rejected Medicaid expansion.

And yet, as Cass points out in his study, we see the exact opposite. Namely, the states that took advantage of ObamaCare’s Medicaid expansion saw a worse impact on their mortality rates than the states that rejected the expansion.

Conclusion

Although I personally do not yet have a theory on the specific mechanism that may be responsible, I am confident in saying that the actual data do not support the breathless claims that rolling back ObamaCare will literally kill many thousands of Americans.

Fans of the Austrian school should not be shocked, though, to discover that having the federal government get more heavily involved in the health sector has apparently made things worse.

 

via http://ift.tt/2soFBMc Tyler Durden

Did Central Bankers Just Light the Fuse on the $217 TRILLION Debt Bomb?

As we noted yesterday, the world’s Central Banks have begun sending signals that the price of money in the financial system (bond yields) is going to be rising.

Why is this a big deal?

Because globally the world has packed on $68 TRILLION in debt since 2007. And ALL of this was issued based on the assumption that bond yields would be remaining at or near record lows.

The bad news?

They’re not. Already we’re beginning to see bond yields RISE.

The yield on the 10-Year Treasury erupted above its long-term trendline in mid-2016. It has since consolidated and is now about to break out of a bullish falling wedge to new highs.

It’s not the only one.

The yields on 10-German Bunds and 10-Year Japanese Government Bonds are ALSO breaking out to the upside in a big way.

Put simply, rising bond yields is a GLOBAL phenomenon. And it spells DOOM for the world’s $217 TRILLION debt bubble.

If you thought the 2007 Debt Bubble was bad… wait until you see what's coming.

Here's a hint…

A Crash is coming…

And smart investors will use it to make literal fortunes from it.

We offer a FREE investment report outlining when the market will collapse as well as what investments will pay out massive returns to investors when this happens. It's called Stock Market Crash Survival Guide.

We made 1,000 copies to the general public.

As we write this, only 47 are left.

To pick up one of the last remaining copies…

CLICK HERE!

Best Regards

Graham Summers

Chief Market Strategist

Phoenix Capital Research

via http://ift.tt/2sugjr1 Phoenix Capital Research

Blue Apron Turns Red; Tumbles Below IPO Price As Underwriters Give Up

So much for the long anticipated debut of the food delivery IPO, with the big customer churn problem and even bigger cash flow problem.

One day after the company IPOed at a downward revised price (seeing its market cap at $1.9 billion, below its last private round valuation of $2 billion) and broke for trading into the green, only to close at exactly $10.00, Red Blue Apron has now tumbled to $9.50, down 5% from its IPO price just yesterday as the underwriters have given up on protecting the $10 IPO price… and the company.

As a reminder, on Wednesday, Blue Apron sold 30 million shares for $10 each, raising less than two-thirds of the $510 million it had initially targeted. Hours before the pricing, the company lowered the IPO range to $10 to $11 a share, down from $15 to $17. The underwriters hoped the price cut would be sufficient to prevent immediate selling. They were wrong.

Sadly, for Blue Apron, there was good reason for the latest selling avalanche. As Bloomberg reported overnight, shortly after raising $300 million in IPO proceeds, Blue Apron will need much more cash, and soon.

The unprofitable meal kit-delivery company, which touted its growth prospects to potential investors on its IPO roadshow, has leaned on its marketing strategy to build a customer base. That outreach eats up a fifth of the company’s total spending.

 

Blue Apron believes its cash and borrowing capacity will be sufficient for at least a year, it said in its revised deal prospectus after lowering its IPO price range. The company added that its liquidity assumptions may prove to be incorrect, and it may increase the borrowing capacity under its revolving credit facility or raise additional funds through equity or debt financing arrangements.

Needless to say, the IPO downsizing was bad news for a company that had a free cash flow deficit of $74 million in the first quarter (multiply by four for the rough full year estimate), and only $61 million of cash on hand. The problem is that while Blue Apron saw a 133% increase in net revenue to $795 million last year, marketing expenses increased 180% to $144 million, according to its deal filing.

Blue Apron’s business is cost-intensive: It first sources ingredients, chops and packages them in fulfillment centers, before sending them for home delivery.

That’s reflected in its balance sheet: Blue Apron has relied on outside funds to fuel its growth. The company raised $195 million from investors including Fidelity Investments and Bessemer Venture Partners, according to its deal filing. The company also increased a revolving credit facility to $200 million. Now, it was lucky to find the greatest fools of all: those who bought its stock.

Alas, that story has now ended.

The story here is almost entirely one of expenses,” said James Gellert, chief executive officer of the financial health analytics firm RapidRatings. “People should be concerned that they say they’ve only got 12 months. If you’re IPO-ing and you’ve only got a 12-month runway, you’re going to be appealing to momentum players and not long-term holders of your stock.”

Worse, with its reduced IPO, Blue Apron no longer intends to pay down existing debt with the proceeds, according to its deal filing. Instead, the funds will all go toward working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes.  The problem: APRN will have to raise more equity in the next few months as its cash, even with the IPO proceeds, runs out.

Meanwhile, if the stock is already crashing to sub-IPO levels without underwriter support, long before shorting is even allowed, we dread to think just how fast this particular “tech startup” will last once the vulture start circling.

via http://ift.tt/2sufvCN Tyler Durden

A New Way to Support Liberty Blitzkrieg – Launching Patreon

Before I get started, I want to thank everyone who has donated to Liberty Blitzkrieg over the years. I’ve been very encouraged by the generosity and kindness of so many people from all over the world. I’ve received contributions from readers in many different countries, including the United States, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and more. I try to send a personal thank you note to everyone, but I’m definitely behind schedule and I apologize if I haven’t reached out to you recently. You are greatly appreciated.

There is absolutely nothing more gratifying and empowering than reader-supported work, which is why I want to move more and more in that direction. Those of you who have been reading me for years have probably noticed a bit of a change in the website over the course of 2017. That change has been intentional. Whereas I used to try to put up as much content as possible, I am now only publishing one post per day. By centering my focus in this manner, I’ve been able to publish far more proprietary and thoughtful content, while avoiding the temptations of clickbait chasing. I think this strategy has resulted in some of the best work I’ve ever created, and I would like to continue to focus my time and energy in this way.

Seeing so many of you make one-time donations freed me up and permitted me to stop obsessing about how many page views I was generating. These donations, in addition to the wonderful partnerships I have with several businesses/organizations, put me in a position where I could focus on quality over quantity and I think the results speak for themselves. To take things to the next level, I want to move further away from having third party corporate behemoth ad networks on my site, and Google Adsense is the really big one.

This desire has inspired me to launch a Patreon page, where readers can pledge a certain dollar donation per month and the site will take care of the rest. I know that some readers feel awkward about making a small one-time donation of only $5, but would gladly give $5 every month. Patreon is the perfect medium for this sort of donor, and has been recommended to me on several occasions.

My initial goal is to reach $1,000 per month, and I recognize this could take a while. To provide a bit of an incentive, I have pledged to remove all Google Adsense ads from my site once the $1,000 per month threshold is reached. I will not be offering any rewards to patrons at first, but if it proves successful, this is certainly something I will consider doing in the future.

If you have any interest in learning more about this new option to support my work, please check out my Patreon page.

When you go to support, you’ll see a default like this below. You can change the dollar value to whatever you want.

Meanwhile, absolutely nothing will change about the site. All content will remain free, and support will be completely voluntary. I am simply adding another option for those of you who are inclined to contribute.

If Patreon isn’t your thing, and you prefer to donate via Bitcoin, cash, check or PayPal, all of those options remain available. If you are interested in donating via another crypto coin, let me know and I will consider it.

Details are below:

1. Send cash or check (check payable to Liberty Blitzkrieg, LLC) to:

Michael Krieger
P.O. Box 21146
Boulder, CO 80308

2. Donate Via PayPal




3. Donate via Bitcoin

Thank you for your readership and your generosity,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 1ArSt9rxBCHgi9ddV3aJSK1dL97gRLimGS

Follow me on Twitter.

A New Way to Support Liberty Blitzkrieg – Launching Patreon originally appeared on Liberty Blitzkrieg on June 30, 2017.

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/2s9vuXp
via IFTTT

UMich Consumer Confidence Slips To 7-Month Lows As Hope Fades

Despite modestly beating expectations, UMich consumer sentiment for June dropped to 95.1 – the lowest since Nov 2016 – led by a collapse in 'hope' for the future.

Inflation expectations for the medium-term fell very modestly but both short- and medium-term remain near record lows.

Personal finance expectations improved in June as did the percentage of Americans expecting higher incomes. However, the percentage of Americans who expect a comfortable retirement dropped notably… and the percentage of Americans who expect the country to have contonuous good times for the next 12 months also tumbled.

The survey shows a widening divide between how Americans view the current state of the economy and prospects for a potential extra boost from Congress and the White House, as lawmakers wrangle over health care and taxes. While 51 percent of all consumers reported recent improvement in their finances — the highest share since 2000 — Republicans are becoming less sanguine about the situation in Washington, according to the report.

For the first time since the election, a bigger share of consumers expected a downturn in the next five years than an uninterrupted expansion. Even so, the average level of sentiment in the first half was the best in 16 years, which supports the household spending that accounts for 70 percent of the economy.

The partisan divide still meant that June's Sentiment Index of 95.1 was nearly equal to both the average (95.7) between the optimism of Republicans and the pessimism of Democrats and the value for Independents (94.6). Surprisingly, the optimism among Republicans and Independents has largely resisted declines in the past several months despite the decreased likelihood that Trump's agenda will be passed in 2017.

“Increasing uncertainty about future prospects for the economy has thus far been offset by the recent strength in jobs and incomes,” Richard Curtin, director of the University of Michigan consumer survey, said in a statement. “The data provide no indication of an imminent downturn nor do the data provide any indication of a resurgent boom in spending.”

via http://ift.tt/2u6vFny Tyler Durden