Female Rapper’s Wardrobe Malfunction At Saudi Concert Triggers Charges Of ‘Prostitution, Blasphemy’

Female Rapper’s Wardrobe Malfunction At Saudi Concert Triggers Charges Of ‘Prostitution, Blasphemy’

A popular Australian rapper, Iggy Azalea, is being accused by Saudi clerics and authorities of “blasphemy” for a concert she performed last Friday in the capital of Riyadh.

The occasion was the Gamers8 Esports tournament for which she was invited as a special performer. Controversial songs included Goddess, in which she asked the audience to “bow down to a goddess” – and also there was the moment she exclaimed “Ladies, make some noise, it’s a woman’s world!”

Getty Images

Of course, this is ultra-male dominated Saudi society, where women are told by Islamic law they must wear the full Muslim veil and that unmarried women shouldn’t go out without a male family escort—all of his enforced by Sharia law courts and ‘morality police’.

The whole performance is being accused of being anti-Islamic, especially for lines from her lyrics which seemed directed at Islam or monotheistic religions in general like “…preaching about prophets, it ain’t no one man can stop us, bow down to a goddess.”

But given these song lyrics, and the full set, was already known in advance – it’s a wonder that Iggy was invited to give a concert in the ultra-conservative kingdom in the first place. 

At one point, quite ironically, there was even a wardrobe malfunction wherein she exposed more flesh than what the kingdom allows. It was merely her pantleg that ripped, exposing her… (gasp!) leg, up to part of her thigh, during which time a staffer frantically tried to toss her a towel to cover it up.

Showing a little leg: watch the wardrobe malfunction which temporarily stopped the show…

As Middle East Eye points out, both the host country and performer should have understood the “risks” involved in Iggy performing in Riyad

On X, Azalea revealed that despite the fact she changed her outfit, Saudi authorities halted the concert due to her lyrics, which, she said, sent them “over the edge”.

Social media users were quick to criticise not just the organizers of the concert, but those attending too.

One user stated “this is kufr [unbelief], blatant shirk [idolatry] being said on stage, and the Muslims were repeating it in the audience”. 

Users also noted that Azalea and her team should have known the extent and danger of the repercussions of performing in Saudi Arabia.

Most of the hate directed at the rapper came from conservative Muslims and anonymous Saudi accounts online, which charged her with ‘prostitution’ and ‘blasphemy’. Another post said the following:

One wonders what would have happened if her relatively minor clothing mishap had been on the level of Janet Jackson’s during that infamous Super Bowl halftime performance.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/31/2023 – 20:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/T1SMNhr Tyler Durden

STVR/Airbnb Has Destroyed America’s Resort Towns

STVR/Airbnb Has Destroyed America’s Resort Towns

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

It turns out society isn’t just the sum total of the Fed goosing “maximizing shareholder value.” People actually have to live in the corrupt, bifurcated, distorted ghetto the Fed and “maximizing shareholder value” have created.

It’s an old story, manifesting now in new ways. The rich, buoyed by inherited wealth and access to credit, find a locale with the qualities they desire, and buy the choicest properties for their own use, and a surrounding band of nearby properties so they won’t be bothered by the bottom 99%.

This story has a new far more destructive chapter, generated by the boom in STVRs–short-term vacation rentals. The uber-wealthy don’t need more money but they’re trained, like hamsters in a lab, to seek ways to maximize their income and capital gains. STVRs–Airbnb et al.–are highly attractive investments to the wealthy and their money-managers–the hedge funds, private equity managers, family-wealth advisors, et al.

Residential real estate that can be converted to STVRs is well within reach of the top 10% households, who own between 80% and 90% of all income-producing assets such as housing rentals, stocks, bonds and business equity.

As the Federal Reserve has distorted credit markets with historically unprecedented low interest rates and “excess liquidity,” the resulting asset bubbles widened the income-wealth gap between the top 10% who already owned most of the assets soaring in value and the bottom 90% who at best owned a family home with a mortgage.

The top 10% saw super-low mortgage rates and the plump returns on STVRs and rushed to snap up any properties that could be converted from long-term rentals to short-term vacation rentals to get their share of the post-pandemic price-insensitive “revenge spending” we-need-a-vacation bonanza.

This mass conversion of long-term rentals for workers into vacation rentals has social and economic consequences. It’s bifurcated America’s desirable towns into luxe enclaves for the “haves” and ghettos for the working “have-nots.” It was all fun and games seeking to “maximize shareholder value” and ride the next bubble to ever greater wealth and income, but the consequence is the destruction of the nation’s social and economic fabric.

I asked longtime correspondent W.S., who has witnessed the transformation in Colorado over the decades, to describe the reality generated by the mass conversion of long-term rentals to STVRs. Here is his account:

“Airbnb has devastated Colorado’s resort towns.

It’s always been expensive to live in places that wealthy people decided they wanted to visit regularly.

Real estate speculators figure out where the money is quickly enough, buy up property, subdivide it and sell lots to their friends, who build second homes, like the single family castles in Beaver Creek and Vail. They build condos and duplexes and sell them to less wealthy folks who want to live in these places and to small investors who rent them to the people who do the actual work in these communities; our teachers, police and fire fighters, hotel and restaurant and small business operators and their staff, the ‘essential services’ folks that nobody thinks much about until one day, a pandemic comes along.

In Colorado, the attraction for the past 50 years has been downhill skiing and while rents always were higher than most places, the folks that moved up to the mountains and worked at the skico and surrounding small businesses generally skied for free – a season pass was a more common benefit than a healthcare plan – and the ‘locals’ lived to ride. Snowboards. Skis. It was a worthwhile trade off.

That era ended completely with AirBnb.

Over the past few years virtually all of the ‘locals’ housing in Vail, the duplexes in nearby Eagle Vail, the houses in Edwards – everything in the upper Eagle River Valley where locals lived – has been purchased – often sight unseen – by hedge funds, private capital and wealthy full and part time homeowners. It has all immediately been turned into short term rental properties (STVRs) – Airbnb, VRBO, etc.

Why rent a two bedroom apartment to a teacher for $1,500 a month when you can Airbnb the same 40 year old unit for $2,500 a week?

Except now, there are literally no housing units available.

Ok, a few pop up now and then but for $3,750 to $4,000 a month, since the work at home class has bid up the price of everything in resort towns with fast internet, and all of them have it. Even if they don’t, Starlink is $120 a month for 50-200 MBPS connectivity. (I have it, it’s flawless.)

Local teachers with masters degrees start at $45,000 a year, fresh out of school.

A $3,750 per month rental requires about $11,000 to move in, first and last plus the security deposit. The annual rent comes to $45,000. Thats the gross pay for new hires, which we need annually as our experienced educators retire, or sell their homes they bought a few years ago for huge gains and move elsewhere.

We can’t hire teachers.

We can’t hire snow plow operators, who are sort of essential in the high country.

Can’t hire substitute teachers at $100 a day.

Can’t hire bus drivers.

Nobody making under $250,000 can buy a house and live here anymore. Wendy’s pays $19 an hour to start – but you can’t work there unless you live with your folks or 4 roommates (maybe).

It’s so bad in Eagle County that the school district is bringing new teachers, fresh graduates from the Philippines. The district is building 37 apartments for them to live in, dorm style. Teaching has become a job only workers imported from other countries can afford to do here, like picking vegetables.

Sure, house prices have gone up a lot because of the influx of work at homers. They’ll probably stay, as heat refugees from the southwest begin to migrate to higher altitudes. But the 20-30 year old former rental units the locals started off in? Sorry. They’re Airbnb.

With no working people to staff the grocery stores, these mountain towns might not be the refuge the heat refugees seek.”

Thank you, W.S., for this insightful on-the-ground report. 

Is it really that surprising that those who still have to work for a living resent being crammed into ghettos while America’s elite class enjoys their Fed-bubble generated wealth and soaring income?

Is it really that surprising that towns swamped with an influx of visitors and wealthy owners are being fouled as their infrastructure is overwhelmed and their natural wealth exploited / stripmined to “maximize shareholder value”?

The Wealthy Are Not Like You and Me–Our Terminally Stratified Society (8/3/23)

Development In A Wealthy Montana Boom Town Is Fouling A World-Class Trout River

There’s Gonna be a War in Montana

It turns out society isn’t just the sum total of the Fed goosing “maximizing shareholder value.” People actually have to live in the corrupt, bifurcated, distorted ghetto the Fed and “maximizing shareholder value” have created.

*  *  *

My new book is now available at a 10% discount ($8.95 ebook, $18 print): Self-Reliance in the 21st CenturyRead the first chapter for free (PDF)

Become a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/31/2023 – 20:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/eAOvs12 Tyler Durden

Fox “Is Run By Small-Minded, Fearful Women”, Trump “Broke A Lot Of People’s Brains” – Tucker & Portnoy Talk Politics, PENN, & Pizza-Fights

Fox “Is Run By Small-Minded, Fearful Women”, Trump “Broke A Lot Of People’s Brains” – Tucker & Portnoy Talk Politics, PENN, & Pizza-Fights

Barstool Sports owner Dave Portnoy joined Tucker Carlson for a ‘Tucker On X’ discussion that ranged from “the greatest business deal in history” to the problems businesses have dealing with regulatory bureaucracy (once its clear they don’t like you) to a fight with a pizza store owner to media bias and finally, Tucker reflected on his exit from Fox.

Having sold Barstool Sports to PENN Entertainment, and pocketing $100 million, Portnoy recently took his company back for the princely sum of $1 and tries to explain what led PENN to make this decision.

“We underestimated the regulators… how difficult they could make this,” given that they did not like some of the things that Barstool was saying.

Everything we did was met with resistance so it made it really hard for this PENN-Barstool relationship to prosper and I think PENN got to the point where they said we are not getting the results we wanted,” he added

The powerful, appointed (not elected) regulators seemed to have a clear agenda against Barstool, perhaps, Portnoy says, because they did not know who we were.

“It’s very hard to get truthful information… everything’s so political, everything’s got an agenda.”

Portnoy, who interviewed President Trump during his term in office, said the liberal media makes him out to be “Hitler,” even more so after he strongly opposed the COVID lockdowns.

“The rise of Trump has exasperated how people think in this country, He’s broken a lot of people’s brains.”

“I was very pro-Trump when he started running because I thought he would break the political system,” and that was that, the media proclaimed “you’re pro-Trump, doesn’t matter what you say for the rest of your life.”

The media “crucified” him, he says, “you went on Tucker, you must be this… you interviewed Trump, you must be this… people don’t listen, they just make snap judgments… it’s a sad state of affairs.”

Portnoy brings up the issue when Business Insider tried to smear him, “they just made shit up about me, there’s zero truth about anything they said about me.” The reason was simple, he explained, “they were a sinking ship, run by a crook” – referring to Henry Blodgett (“the greatest scumbag of all time”) of dot-com-bubble-analyst-fraud infamy, “and they just needed subscriptions.”

Portnoy also shared a video of him getting into a fight with a pizza restaurant owner – over a bad review that the Barstool boss gave him (around 31: 30 in the clip)…

“This is my spot. I hope you enjoy your pizza. But I don’t appreciate what you do to small businesses,” the owner said.

“Fuck you,” Portnoy responded, raising his middle finger. “Fuck you.

Then the pair discussed Tucker’s exit from Fox, “I’m not exactly sure what I said that was bad… and one day for whatever reason they’d had enough.”

Carlson says the Murdochs “were always nice to me… they never got in my way” but noted that he “was not expecting it,” and added that “there were small minds… it’s a company run by fearful women… second-tier people who would hassle my producers.”

Carlson notes “my view on the war on Ukraine was really hated,” explaining that he was never pro-Russian, but took the view that “this is not our fight, this is not good for us… we should put an end to the war, because people die in war.”

That was considered “crazy pro-Kremlin propaganda, and they were very very mad about that.”

Finally, Portnoy brings up Mitch McConnell’s recent ‘glitch’, and asks “how are these people running our country?”

Watch the full interview below:

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/31/2023 – 20:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/2ijEdOk Tyler Durden

Sweetened Drinks Are Linked to Chronic Liver Disease And Liver Cancer

Sweetened Drinks Are Linked to Chronic Liver Disease And Liver Cancer

Authored by Flora Zhao via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Do you find yourself drinking a sweetened beverage every day? Be cautious, as this habit could increase the risk of chronic liver disease and even liver cancer.

It is widely known that consuming sweetened drinks can contribute to obesity and insulin resistance. A recent prospective cohort study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has further revealed detrimental health effects linked to sweetened drinks, particularly concerning liver disease. The study showed that individuals who regularly consume sweetened drinks face an astonishing 85 percent higher likelihood of developing liver cancer and a 68 percent higher risk of mortality from chronic liver disease than those who consume fewer sweetened drinks.

(successo images/Shutterstock)

Elevated Risks of Liver Cancer and Liver Disease

This study was led by scientists from Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and it drew data from a comprehensive prospective clinical database in the United States: the Women’s Health Initiative. The database has been gathering information from a cohort of over 160,000 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79. The information collection concluded in 2020, spanning a follow-up period of approximately 21 years.

Epidemiological studies on dietary factors and liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality are limited,” the researchers emphasized in the report. “To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and chronic liver disease mortality.”

Participants completed the survey questionnaire detailing their consumption of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened drinks, excluding fruit juices. These individuals were divided into three groups:

  • Women who consumed three servings or less per month.
  • Women who drank one to six servings per week.
  • Women who drank one or more servings per day (with one serving equivalent to 12 ounces or 355 milliliters, roughly the size of a standard beverage can).

The findings revealed that women who consumed one or more servings of sweetened drinks daily had an 85 percent higher risk of developing liver cancer than those who drank three servings or less per month. Additionally, their mortality rate due to chronic liver disease was 68 percent higher.

In the study, “chronic liver disease” refers to conditions like nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, liver fibrosis, alcoholic liver disease, and chronic hepatitis. During the calculation, potential factors that could influence liver disease, including age, ethnicity, education level, smoking and alcohol consumption habits, and body mass index, were taken into account.

Known risk factors for liver cancer include hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infections, metabolic disorders, excessive alcohol consumption, and foods contaminated with aflatoxins, such as peanuts and corn. “However, approximately 40% of patients with liver cancer do not have these risk factors. … Therefore, it is important to identify dietary risk factors for liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality,” the researchers stated in the report.

The Impact of Sweetened Drinks on the Liver

Other studies have also corroborated the damaging effects of sweetened drinks on the liver.

A prospective European cohort study revealed that individuals who consume over six servings of soft drinks per week face a notably higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (the most common form of liver cancer) by 83 percent compared to those who consume fewer than one serving. The risk increases by 6 percent for each additional serving per week. Another study conducted in the United States indicated that drinking sugar-sweetened soda is associated with an 18 percent increase in the risk of liver cancer.

Research has also demonstrated a link between sweetened drink consumption and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease onset. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the European Journal of Nutrition revealed that individuals who consumed the highest amounts of sugar-sweetened drinks had a 40 percent increased odds of developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease compared to those who consumed the least. Another study in 2022 proposed that individuals who frequently consume sugar-sweetened drinks have 2.53 times increased odds of developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease compared to those who rarely drink such beverages.

Read more here…

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/31/2023 – 19:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/xyWzVB7 Tyler Durden

Ukraine’s FM Tells Critics Of Counteroffensive To “Shut Up” After NYT Piece

Ukraine’s FM Tells Critics Of Counteroffensive To “Shut Up” After NYT Piece

In angry words which sound more like something one would hear on an elementary school playground, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba on Thursday lashed out at critics of Kiev’s failing counteroffensive by telling them to… “shut up”. Here’s Reuters reporting the unusual statement:

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba hit out on Thursday at critics of Kyiv’s tactics in its counter-offensive against Russia’s invasion, saying they were spitting in the faces of Ukrainian soldiers and should “shut up”.

“Criticizing the slow pace of (the) counter-offensive equals … spitting into the face of (the) Ukrainian soldier who sacrifices his life every day, moving forward and liberating one kilometeter of Ukrainian soil after another,” Kuleba told a press conference at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Toledo, Spain.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, Getty Images

He then sarcastically urged all critics to go to Ukraine themselves and fight if they think they can do it better. Standing alongside Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares at the Thursday presser, he said:

“I would recommend all critics to shut up, come to Ukraine and try to liberate one square centimeter by themselves.”

Ironically he appeared to be responding to his biggest backer – Washington, in a “bite the hand that feeds you” moment.

Last week, The New York Times published a scathing critique of Ukraine’s battlefield tactics and overall strategy. The report was based on anonymous US officials who complained that Ukraine’s leaders weren’t heeding the Pentagon’s advice.

“American strategists say Ukraine’s troops are too spread out and need to concentrate along the counteroffensive’s main front in the south,” the Times wrote, in what amounted to an explainer on why the counteroffensive is failing.

The report also complained that Ukraine (like Russia) fights “under old Soviet Communist war doctrine” in a clear swipe. The theme of the criticism centered on Kiev rejecting Pentagon guidance, hence a stalled and losing counteroffensive:

But some analysts say the progress may be too little too late. The fighting is taking place on mostly flat, unforgiving terrain, which favors the defenders. The Russians are battling from concealed positions that Ukrainian soldiers often see only when they are feet away. Hours after Ukrainians clear a field of mines, the Russians sometimes fire another rocket that disperses more of them at the same location.

Under American war doctrine, there is always a main effort to ensure that maximum resources go to a single front, even if supporting forces are fighting in other areas to hedge against failure or spread-out enemy defenses.

So clearly, based on this new outburst of Kuleba in telling external critics to “shut-up”, the Ukrainians were outraged upon seeing the Times article which highlighted the complaints of US officials. It also serves as confirmation that indeed the battlefield situation is quite dire for Ukraine.

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/31/2023 – 19:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/BARwLVX Tyler Durden

Don’t Look Up! ‘Orwellian’ AI Traffic Cameras Raise Privacy Concerns

Don’t Look Up! ‘Orwellian’ AI Traffic Cameras Raise Privacy Concerns

Authored by Matthew Lysiak via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Existing traffic cameras set up across America to find speeding and red light scofflaws are being replaced by smarter, artificial intelligence-fueled versions equipped with upgraded software that for the first time gives the government the ability to monitor behavior inside of private vehicles, raising the alarm of privacy advocates.

“The public should be rightly concerned,” Electronic Frontier Foundation Senior Policy Analyst Matthew Guariglia told The Epoch Times. “Congress has completely abdicated their responsibility to protect people’s privacy.”

Screens show the feeds from traffic cameras at the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada’s FAST traffic management center, on Dec. 6, 2016. (AP Photo/John Locher)

The Biden administration’s 2022 $2.2 trillion infrastructure legislation has led to a dramatic rise in new traffic cameras after federal guidance issued after the bill became law allowed many states to invest in surveillance equipment. Previously, transportation funds allocated to states were limited to fund infrastructure projects, such as repairing roadways and bridges, with the spending of federal funds for cameras only permitted for school zones. However, the Biden administration authorized states to utilize up to 10 percent of the bill’s $15.6 billion highway safety funds to purchase cameras and other “automated traffic enforcement” tools—and many did just that.

The most recent data compiled last year by Comparitech, a consumer advocacy group focused on cybersecurity, found that the number of cameras on American streets has exploded, with the average city having around six cameras per 1,000 people while the most-watched city, Atlanta, Georgia, has nearly 50 cameras per 1,000 people. Data revealing the current number of traffic cameras is unavailable, but is expected to be significantly larger.

The decision to open the infrastructure funding to traffic cameras came as an attempt to decrease traffic-related deaths, according to officials.

Almost 95 percent of our Nation’s transportation deaths occur on America’s streets, roads, and highways, and they are on the rise,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said in the National Roadway Safety Strategy release following passage of the legislation.

However, many see the increase in surveillance technology as a cash grab for cities trying to make up for post COVID budget shortfalls. In March, Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser proposed adding hundreds of new traffic cameras to city streets to compensate for a projected drop in revenue of nearly $400 million. Priya Sarathy Jones, deputy executive director of the Fines and Fees Justice Center, told Reuters that cameras monitoring traffic are “one of the easiest things for us to turn to and generate revenue quickly.”

Further, software upgrades that allow for the ability to analyze the inside of vehicles and the behaviors of the drivers and passengers have raised concerns among privacy advocates of an increasingly intrusive government that would have seemed straight out of a dystopian science fiction novel to past generations.

In the United Kingdom, authorities have already issued hundreds of fines to drivers after AI traffic cameras were used to detect violations such as not wearing a seatbelt.

United Kingdom Civil Liberties campaigner Jake Hurfurt, of Big Brother Watch, told the newspaper The Sun, “This kind of intrusive and creepy surveillance which treats every passer-by as a potential suspect is excessive and normalizing. It poses a threat to everyone’s privacy.”

People should be free to go about their lives without being analyzed by faceless AI systems.”

In July, local governments in Australia installed new phone-detection cameras along roads to spot drivers who are texting on their mobile devices.

In America, cities like Seattle, Tacoma, and San Francisco, and Reno have also adopted AI traffic cameras with the stated goal of improving the flow of traffic. Los Angeles and New York have also discussed utilizing the technology.

While the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution offers protection against video searches conducted by the police, there are currently no general, legally enforceable rules to limit privacy invasions.

Mr. Guariglia warns that the ethical lines between the need for public safety and an Orwelian police state can sometimes become blurred with advances in technology.

“I can definitely see it coming where cameras are doing analytics on passengers inside of a car,” said Mr. Guariglia. “This could make citizens susceptible to police surveillance in giving up the knowledge of where they worship, what lawyer they are going to see, or which reporters they are talking to.”

In at least one other country, residents have already begun fighting back against the technology.

After London rolled out an expansion of its Ultra Low Emission Zone program, which uses AI traffic cameras to identify and fine drivers of older vehicles who enter the city, many citizens showed their outrage through acts of vandalism. Police say this month hundreds of intelligent cameras have been damaged, disconnected, or stolen by a vigilante group who call themselves the Blade Runners.

The cameras are going to keep coming down,” Nick Arlett, an organizer of the protests, told CBS News. “People are angry.”

Tyler Durden
Thu, 08/31/2023 – 19:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/AStW56C Tyler Durden