Russian Oil Refinery Catches Fire Following Ukrainian Drone Attacks

Russian Oil Refinery Catches Fire Following Ukrainian Drone Attacks

By Tsvetana Paraskova of OilPrice.com

A Lukoil refinery in western Russia is on fire following a drone attack early on Tuesday local time in what appears to be several coordinated attacks by drones from Ukraine on Russian refinery and fuel facilities.   

A crude processing unit at the refinery in Nizhny Novgorod is on fire after a drone attack was carried out on Tuesday morning, Gleb Nikitin, governor of Nizhny Novgorod, wrote on his Telegram channel.

Investigators and fire brigades are working to contain the fire at one of the refinery’s units, Nikitin said, adding that preliminary reports say there have been no injuries.

Another energy facility in western Russia was also attacked by a drone overnight.

A drone attack was launched at a fuel and energy facility in the Oryol region, governor Andrey Klychkov said on Telegram. One of the fuel tanks caught fire as a result of the attack, a representative of the local authorities told Russian news agency TASS.

Local officials in the capital city Moscow, as well as in the regions of Kursk, Tula, Voronezh, and Belgorod also reported drone attacks, without giving more details. 

Ukraine hasn’t commented on the drone attacks.

Ukraine’s security services have been hitting with drones Russian refineries, especially those in southern Russia, in attacks that have intensified since the beginning of the year.

The Ukrainian attacks and the damage they caused to Russian refineries have reduced Russia’s capability to process crude. In mid-February, Russia’s refinery rates had slumped by 380,000 barrels per day (bpd) compared to December levels as several refineries were under repairs after being hit by Ukrainian drone attacks.

Lower refining capacity in the second quarter, due to refinery maintenance and emergency repairs following the attacks, could be one of the reasons why Russia said it would focus on cuts to oil production instead of exports in its voluntary supply reduction as part of OPEC+ in the second quarter.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 17:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/x4OqcNQ Tyler Durden

Biden Finds $300 Million In More Arms For Ukraine Even As Pentagon’s Own Stockpile Diminished 

Biden Finds $300 Million In More Arms For Ukraine Even As Pentagon’s Own Stockpile Diminished 

The US Department of Defense has admitted not only that it is out of money to procure replacement weapons after vast amounts of America’s weaponry were shipped to Ukraine over the past two years, but the US defense budget is vastly overdrawn, to the tune of $10 billion

In focus here are dwindling US stockpiles for America’s defense needs, and yet as The Associated Press reports Tuesday, the Biden administration has almost magically come up with hundreds of millions more (found some “cost savings” we are told)… for Ukraine:

The Pentagon will rush about $300 million in weapons to Ukraine after finding some cost savings in its contracts, even though the military remains deeply overdrawn and needs at least $10 billion to replenish all the weapons it has pulled from its stocks to help Kyiv in its desperate fight against Russia, the White House announced Tuesday.

It’s the Pentagon’s first announced security package for Ukraine since December, when it acknowledged it was out of replenishment funds. It wasn’t until recent days that officials publicly acknowledged they weren’t just out of money to buy replacement weapons, they are $10 billion overdrawn.

In announcing the new $300 million, national security adviser Jake Sullivan said, “When Russian troops advance and its guns fire, Ukraine does not have enough ammunition to fire back.”

In recent months, defense industry journals have run article after article warning of the dangers of the Pentagon’s currently depleted arms and ammunition stockpiles.

For example, last December RealClearDefense sounded the alarm over what it called “A Shrunken Arsenal: The Alarming Decline of U.S. Munitions”.

The publication imagined what would happen if the US military were to suddenly be drawn into a hot war with China, and concluded it might not last very long

In a U.S. fight with China, American forces will likely burn through munitions stocks within three weeks. Even with a surge of the U.S. industrial base, replenishing stocks will take more than six months. In the interim, the U.S. will be without sufficient bombs and bullets for its cutting-edge systems, such as fifth-generation fighter jets and High Mobility Rocket Launcher Systems, and anti-air missiles needed to protect our nuclear aircraft carriers and bases in the Pacific.

It should be recalled that last year Washington even took the unprecedented step of tapping into its stockpile of 155mm rounds held in Israel, to send hundreds of thousands to Ukraine forces.

And yet, none of this appears to have made a difference, given now the widespread acknowledgement that Kiev forces are losing ground, and simply desperately trying to hold front line positions, amid a dire shortage of manpower and ammo.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 17:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/RPv6cas Tyler Durden

Modern “Leadership”: A Perfect Blend Of Delusion, Dishonesty, & Distraction

Modern “Leadership”: A Perfect Blend Of Delusion, Dishonesty, & Distraction

Authored by Matthew Piepenburg via VonGreyerz.gold,

As is historically typical of all corrupted and objectively bankrupt nations, the truth is often as hard to find as an honest man in parliament.

Thus, if you want to see what’s most true, and embarrassing (and directly linked) to desperately cornered power-brokers increasingly enamored by the centralizing marriage of corporate influence and government opportunists (currently masquerading as “democracy”), the best evidence of genuine reality often lies in what is deliberately omitted from the headlines and public discussion.

Stated otherwise, the devil doesn’t just lie in the details, it lies in what is deliberately ignored, omitted or censored.

As any serious devotee of history (now increasingly cancelled as “elitist”) already knows, there’s no greater power than the power to control the two key levers of society, namely: 1) information and 2) money.

Unfortunately, even in the land of the free, neither of these forces (from genuine capitalism to the fourth estate) serve its deliberately “tribalized” citizenry. Our so-called free press (aka “legacy media”) is anything but free, and our “independent” Federal Reserve is anything but Federal, a reserve or independent.

The ironies just abound.

Between the corporate media and the central bank, it’s fairly clear that both of these time-honored institutions are now openly in bed with big government.

This is not fable, but fact. It’s also ominous.

How Information is Controlled

Note, for example, how the obvious blunders of the “safe and effective” COVID policies/failures of late (from hysterical and global mandates, lab-leak denials, and excess-death math to the global gaslighting of the un-vaxed) have been curiously absent from the headlines or public debate, when just over a year ago this “crisis” was the center of all our lives.

Attempts by the French legislature were even made to fine or jail those criticizing the vaccine. It seems, for some, at least, that Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité has become a convenient phrase rather than guiding ideal. C’est la vie…

More, however, can be said of the strangely silent headlines on the blatant (and finally confirmed) illegality of Trudeau’s invoking of emergency powers to criminalize truckers’ collective expression of free speech and dissent in Canada, or the demonizing of veterans who question the neocon’s US proxy war in the Ukraine as “unpatriotic” or a threat to “national security.”

In short, if you want to see the truth of what scares the power-brokers whose policies defy the open common sense of the common man (which Walt Whitman described as the true spirit of any nation), just look at what those clinging to power deny, hide from, cancel, censor, confuse or punish.

Or to paraphrase Shakespeare, they “doth protest too much,” for they know they are in the wrong.

How Money is Controlled

Turning from the centralization of information toward the centralization of money, the template is no different.

Obfuscation, devilish little details and outright absence of discussion and headlines are where you find the darker truths behind our entirely rigged-to-fail financial system, which as we’ve shouted from the rooftops with facts rather than fear, is little more than a modern feudalism of insider lords and public serfs.

As we’ve warned for years, solving a debt crisis with more debt, which is then paid for with money mouse-clicked out of thin air, is not policy—it’s fantasy.

We’ve also warned that at some point this fantasy (and debt addiction) will lead to not only more lies, more wars and more centralization by the state (as well as a pretextfor dystopian CBDC), but to an inflationary QE endgame/hangover of currency destruction interrupted by a conveniently deflationary (and openly denied) recession.

This is because a government $34T (and counting) out of debt control will have no choice but to take full control over our markets and money via capital controls, yield curve controls and more currency-killing QE to provide fake liquidity to a fake (Fed-driven/deficit-driven) market and economy.

Memories Are Short, Headlines Are Empty

Remember when Bernanke, for example, said QE would be “temporary”? What followed was QE 2,3,4, Operation Twist and then unlimited QE in 2020.

Remember when he also said such magical money would have no impact on the currency, which is the same thing Nixon said when he decoupled from gold in 1971?

What followed was a 98% decline in the USD’s purchasing power when measured against a milligram of gold.

And now, with Powell (who also said inflation was “transitory”) still toe-dipping into QT and hawkish rates, he seems to think no more QE will be needed, and that even the rate cuts he promised months backed are now being back-stepped.

Why?

Because Powell, like all political figures (and the FED IS POLITICAL) is pathologically incapable of admitting error or offering transparency or accountability for the debt hole his Fed has dug for us since its creepy inception in 1913.

After his “higher-for-longer” fight against inflation (a ruse to re-load his rate gun for the next recession) knee-capped the middle class, regional banks, and small businesses in an economy that is witnessing the highest level of corporate bankruptcies and layoffs in over a decade, Powell is still relying on words rather than math.

In this way, he has tempted an appallingly narrow S&P (which is nothing more than a tech ETF led by five names) to all time highs on just the suggestion (rather than act) of rate cuts.

But as I’ve argued elsewhere, this S&P bubble couldn’t come at a worse time nor in a worse national and global setting.

More Currency-Killing QE Will Come

Despite (and frankly, because of) all this embarrassing (and ignored) disfunction, the inflationary QE will come.

In fact, it has been hiding in plain sight.

Five times in the last four years, the two-heads (Yellen and Powell) of the two-headed financial snake in DC have been quietly providing trillions in back-door QE in various forms yet completely off the public headline/radar.

That is, via emptying of the Treasury General Account, issuing unloved IOUs from different extremes of the yield curve and sucking liquidity from the Reverse Repo Markets, DC has managed to buy more fantasy and time from “back-door” sources of liquidity which are now tapping out.

But math, as well looking beyond the headlines, teaches us that front-door (i.e., direct) QE is only a matter of time—i.e., just one popping and deflationary S&P bubble away.

For now, of course, Powell can’t say the quiet part out loud, and the vast majority of children playing within our Congress can’t even count out it loud.

How Dumb is the CBO?

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), for example, has already projected another $20T in US Federal Debt to be issued in the next 10 years.

If this number wasn’t so mind-numbingly shocking enough (yet largely ignored from the WSJ or NYT), what is even more comical (and mind-numbing) is that the same CBO also foresees NO recession in that 10-year projection.

Furthermore, the CBO is assuming that 10Y yields (i.e., interest rates) will be 40 basis points lower than they are today.

Wow.

The level of dishonesty, denial and/or outright stupidity in such a projection literally defies belief and hard reality.

Why?

First, the CBO is ignoring the recession we are already in.

Secondly, the only way for yields on the US 10Y to be lower than they are today is if someone (or some “thing”) actually buys Uncle Sam’s IOUs. (Yields move inversely to bond demand.)

Yet based on not only our last report on the most recent UST auction, and based far more importantly on the unspoken reality that global central banks have been net-sellers rather than buyers of USTs since 2014, one has to wonder from where those mathematical wonder kids at the CBO expect that bond demand to come?

The honest answer, of course, is that there are not enough natural buyers of our unloved IOUs.

This means the actual buying will come from a mouse-clicker at the Eccles Building, where zeros can be added to a balance sheet far easier than say…actual GDP.

Equally clear, is the fact that the trillions of such mouse-clicked dollars are fake dollars, and despite the ongoing debates between “base money” and “reserve notes,” QE IS inherently inflationary.

Powell, for all his faults, knows this.

But his political position (and hence proclivities) means he will continue to well… lie about the inevitability of more QE, more inflation and more currency debasement, which as we (and history) have also warned for years, is THE endgame.

New, Clever Little Lies and More Time-Buying at Your Expense

In the interim, the Fed and its sister little devil, the US Treasury Department, will come up with clever tricks to tell the surface truth while substantively (and simultaneously) lying.

In short, politics 101.

They do this via absolute confusion and brain-numbing details, acronyms and data hiding—i.e. “smoke and mirrors.”

For example, recently, the magicians in DC (namely, the ISDA, or “International Swaps & Derivatives Association) have asked the FED, the FDIC and the OCC (the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) to reinstitute the UST exclusion for Supplementary Leverage Ratios (SLRs) at Federal Reserve Banks.

Most of you, of course, are saying: “What in the he_ _ does that mean?”

Well, that’s the entire point: You’re not supposed to understand, and you’re not supposed to notice.

Like all other pre-QE and current “backdoor QE” tricks, DC doesn’t want to show its bad poker hand.

That is, it doesn’t want you to know how broke(n) our dollar thirsty (i.e., debt-soaked) nation truly is.

In simple English, by excluding SLRs from calculations at the Fed banks (which was last done when markets tanked in April of 2020), banks are allowed to buy USTs with no reserve requirements (which essentially allows for unlimited leverage).

Or in even simpler English, this is just QE without the Fed having to say the “QE” part out loud.

Shocker?

Hardly. Just more words replacing bad math, which in my opinion, is the perfect description of the current financial cycle (or fourth turning…)

Takeaways?

Given that extreme liquidity, as well as extreme leverage, is THE trigger for extreme debt and then extreme disaster in markets and economies (a theme repeated from David Hume to von Mises, or Reinhart & Rogoff to Jeremy Grantham), those investors playing the long-game (rather than a Taylor Swift S&P) are thinking preparation not FOMO.

Rather than chase tops, the smart money is looking at assets that cannot be “popped” when all that is rosy today turns to blood in the streets tomorrow.

Currencies–for all the myriad reasons discussed elsewhere, from De-dollarization to central bank debasement and petrodollar divergence–will be hit even harder, and yes, the USD too.

This explains the breakout in anti-fiat assets like BTC and gold.

We are not going to compare “digital” gold and real gold here, but have long argued that they are not the same assets, stores of value or mediums of exchange. Nor are we here to critique fans of the former to highlight investors of the latter.

I love gold. This doesn’t mean I hate BTC. But there’s a difference.

What we do know, and can say, however, is that the world’s central banks are stacking physical gold at unprecedented levels and that the COMEX and London exchanges are seeing historical (and one-way) out-flows from these exchanges for the simple reason that the world wants gold– a tier-1 asset—far more than it wants a UST.

In short, seismic shifts are not coming, they are already happening to the currencies of distrusted and debt-heavy sovereigns.

Many, however, will still try to understand gold’s price moves in connection with (i.e., as a “correlation” to) Fed policies as to rates (up or down), bond yields (up or down), the DXY/USD (up or down) or CPI inflation (up or down).

What we are seeing however, is that gold breaks away from all standard “correlations” when nations tip toward chaos, which is what always follows a debt crisis.

The fact that Germany, the UK, Japan, South Korea and China are technically in recession, while America denies recession at home, suggests to us (gee whiz) that such chaos (financial, military, social, currency and political) is already upon us.

And as trust falls in such a backdrop of objectively neutered currencies, gold simply rises, because it’s real rather than paper money.

The BIS knows this, the world’s central banks know this. Wall Street legends know this.

And yes, gold just reached all time highs in USD terms. We all know this.

But there is much, much, more to come for gold, and for no other reason, than that there is sadly much, much more disfunction ahead in the financially upside-down (and debt-trapped) world which our leaders have handed us.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 17:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/GmcXzN9 Tyler Durden

WTI Turns Green After API Reports Across-The-Board Inventory Draws

WTI Turns Green After API Reports Across-The-Board Inventory Draws

Oil prices slipped lower today after uglier than expected inflation sent yields higher (whipsawed wider markets) and perhaps more notably, OPEC said its latest supply cuts had stalled as Iraq and Libya producing more than their quota.

Slightly higher-than-expected CPI numbers are not likely to “rock the boat,” said Ole Hansen, a commodity strategist at Saxo Bank A/S, “overall a report that is unlikely to impact the thinking.”

Analysts expected a seventh straight weekly build in crude stocks…

API

  • Crude -5.52mm (+400k exp)

  • Cushing -998k

  • Gasoline -3.75mm

  • Distillates -1.16mm

After 6 straight weeks of builds, API surprised by reporting a large crude draw last week. In fact, stockpiles drew-down across the whole complex…

Source: Bloomberg

WTI was trading around $77.75 ahead of the print and rallied after…

And while crude prices declined, wholesale gasoline prices are soaring… and so are pump prices…

Source: Bloomberg

There’s a risk that premium gasoline prices could reach a multi-year high this year, said Mukesh Sahdev, head of oil trading and downstream research at Rystad Energy AS.

“There’s not a lot President Biden can do in time for the election, if this happens” he said.

“Strategic petroleum reserves are low, and there are few levers for the US government to pull to lower gasoline prices.”

Of course, we are sure Biden will blame gas stations if prices go up.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 16:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/LHhSuFl Tyler Durden

Mr. Garland, Can I Vote In France And Spain?

Mr. Garland, Can I Vote In France And Spain?

Authored by Roger Simon via The Epoch Times,

I would like to vote in France and Spain. And for that matter, I wouldn’t mind voting in Germany as well.

I have opinions about the government in all three countries and I can even speak their languages relatively well, well enough to read the newspapers anyway. (My German is a little shaky.)

Unfortunately, I don’t have identification in any of those countries in order to vote, but according to our Attorney General Merrick Garland, that’s not a problem, because IDs are somehow discriminatory and should not be required to vote.

Did you hear that, Monsieur Macron? Say the word and I’ll be on a plane to Charles de Gaulle within a day. But, alas, I know you still require a French National Identity Card or French Passport to vote. How old fashioned of your country!

In Spain, I can use a driver’s license, but regrettably that is also a form of photo ID.

Dang! Life is just unfair!

Thank goodness Mr. Garland feels differently, as reported by the Washington Times:

“Attorney General Merrick Garland said on the eve of the Super Tuesday primaries that states requiring voter ID at the polls and restricting drop boxes are suppressing Black voters, and the Justice Department has doubled the number of its lawyers to fight those laws.”

The man himself is quoted as adding the following at the Tabernacle Baptist Church in Selma, Alabama:

“That is why we are challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot, including those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements.”

With all due respect, Mr. Garland, that is not what you are doing. You are making it easier to stuff the ballot, through the mail, in those drop boxes, and now in-person for individuals sans ID, some of whom could easily be illegal immigrants.

Most people know this. A majority of Americans do not believe we have fair elections anymore. You are just adding to the perception.

This is true even in your own party.

A Rasmussen poll in early March found that 57 percent of Democrats would oppose certification of the forthcoming presidential election were Donald Trump to win.

We live in a country of mutual distrust fanned by years of prevarication, electoral and otherwise.

But it’s actually worse.

Behind this pandering to black and other minorities is the notion that they are incapable of obtaining IDs for themselves.

Were I one of these minorities, I would be insulted and appalled. This is racism at its purist.

In a world where black people have already been president of our country, CEOs of major corporations, and the first in history to surgically separate conjoined twins joined at the head, this kind of thinking seems both meretricious and bizarre.

Would Mr. Garland dare say that the same people not be required to have a legal ID to get on an airplane like the rest of us?

Not if he or one of his relatives or friends were on that plane, I would wager.

But to vote, that’s fine. It doesn’t matter who you are or where you came from. Zetas cartel? No problem. CCP? No problem.

In a recent appearance on Maria Bartiromo’s “Sunday Morning Futures,” the newly installed co-chair of the Republican National Committee, Lara Trump, named election integrity as the primary goal of her party’s new regime.

Amen to that. And high time, too, since the GOP has acquiesced to a tainted system for many years. The country had acquiesced to it as well, much of the public, until now, not realizing until recently how corrupt it had become.

Without election integrity, we do not have the semblance of a democratic country of any sort, specifically, in our case, a constitutional republic.

For some time, Donald Trump has adamantly supported the purity of same-day voting on paper ballots, though he has argued of late that his supporters must engage in early and mail-in voting for now to combat a situation that is radically unbalanced.

Lara Trump also emphasized on Maria Bartiromo’s show that an unprecedented effort was going to be made by the RNC in November via poll watchers and election observers of every sort to preserve integrity and prevent cheating.

For Mr. Garland’s part, to heighten the propaganda impact, because that was what he was engaged in, the attorney general made his arguments in favor of the unnecessary IDs in Selma, Alabama, where Dr. Martin Luther King and his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) began a then highly justifiable voting rights march in 1965.

I remember watching this historic event from afar as a young man in graduate school. It helped inspire my own small participation in the civil rights movement in South Carolina in the summer of 1966.

I made a mistake then that was to some extent similar, although in no way on as great a scale, to what Mr. Garland made in 2024. I was advised to go into the fields to register cotton pickers, who were largely women, to vote, generally a good thing. Most were illiterate in those days, so I would instruct them in writing an X on the line to formalize their registration.

Then I did something I now regret. On the lines below to register their party affiliations, I instructed them to place their Xs next to Democrat, and all of them did.

This was the wrong thing to do on many levels, the most obvious one being that I had no right, political or moral, to do it. But, smugly, in those days, I thought I was doing the right thing.

Over the years, I have corrected myself. At least I hope so. But I strongly suspect the same self-righteousness motivates Mr. Garland. A little self-inspection might be advisable, because what he is promoting is not the road to justice or equality in any form. It is a road to totalitarianism.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 16:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/SksDeFv Tyler Durden

Big-Tech Bounces But Hot Inflation Hits Bonds, Bullion, & Bitcoin

Big-Tech Bounces But Hot Inflation Hits Bonds, Bullion, & Bitcoin

It seems Breakevens were on to something

Source: Bloomberg

This morning’s CPI was not at all what the narrative-peddlers wanted to see and that sent rate-cut expectations tumbling…

Source: Bloomberg

…and the timing of the first cut extended (May is now off the table)….

Source: Bloomberg

Treasury yields were higher across the board with very little spread across the curve (up around 6bps on the day)

Source: Bloomberg

Of course, higher inflation, less dovishness in STIRs, higher bond yields are not a good sign for stocks… but that would be in a normal world. But as we highlighted overnight, this market was priced for worse... and so Nasdaq, S&P, and The Dow all surged higher along with bond yields…

Source: Bloomberg

…just like it has been for months…

Source: Bloomberg

Small Caps did suffer… but all the other US majors were up large with Nasdaq leading…

Mag7 stocks bounced strongly to pre-payrolls levels…

Source: Bloomberg

The pre-CPI anxiety priced into VIX was immediately eviscerated…

Source: Bloomberg

The dollar spiked higher on the CPI data but faded back some gains…

Source: Bloomberg

Bitcoin ended lower on the day, but well off its lows after puking down to yesterday’s lows and bouncing off $69,000…

Source: Bloomberg

But once again we saw huge net inflows yesterday (over $500mm)…

Source: Bloomberg

Gold was clubbed like a baby seal, also erasing yesterday’s gains…

Source: Bloomberg

Oil was marginally lower on the day, ahead of tonight’s API inventory data…

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, in case you were under any impression that The Fed is still apolitical…

Source: Bloomberg

Powell and his pals are ‘allowing’ financial conditions to be at their loosest/easiest since before The Fed began tightening… and doing very little, if anything to push back against that market-driven narrative. How do you think this ends?

And then there’s this… four years ago today, it all started to go pear-shaped…

 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 16:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/rbLg0SD Tyler Durden

Trump Did Propose 10,000 National Guard Troops On January 6th; Report

Trump Did Propose 10,000 National Guard Troops On January 6th; Report

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

One of the long-standing unanswered questions from the January 6th riot has been why the Capitol was so poorly prepared and defended on that day. A newly released transcript has caused a firestorm in Washington over allegations that the J6 Committee downplayed or even suppressed evidence that former President Donald Trump personally suggested the deployment of 10,000 national guard troops to prevent violence.

The transcript also includes contradictions of major allegations that ran wild in the media.

That includes the claim that Trump tried to physically grab the steering wheel of the presidential limo, “The Beast,” when Secret Service refused to take him to the Capitol. Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson was the source of the claim, which appeared in most of the media and was highlighted in her testimony. However, it appears that the J6 Committee had testimony of secret service agents directly contradicting that account, including the driver.

However, it is the National Guard question that is more weighty for historical purposes.

Trump has long claimed that he proposed the deployment of the National Guard troops (as was done previously at the White House during violent protests). The January 6th Committee said that was a lie.

The release of the transcript by Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R., Ga.) triggered attacks on the J6 Committee. The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway wrote a column titled “Former Rep. Liz Cheney’s January 6 Committee suppressed evidence.”

That triggered an angry response from former co-chair Liz Cheney which led to an even angrier reply from commentator Mark Levin.

The anger is nothing new in a J6 investigation that seemed to produce more heat than light. Cheney’s spokesperson called the Federalist report “flatly false” and added “no transcripts were destroyed” while acknowledging that some material was not published “to allow the Secret Service to protect sensitive security information for interviews of its agents before preserving that testimony in the archives.”

The issue of the suppression or destruction of the evidence has drawn a lot of attention, but the more troubling question is the fact that such an offer was made and declined.

The Committee found “no evidence” that the Trump administration called for 10,000 National Guard members to Washington, D.C., to protect the Capitol.

That now stands contradicted and the question is whether Cheney or other members knew the public was being misled on the question. For example, the Washington Post “debunked” Trump’s comments with an award of “Four Pinocchios.”

The Post’s Glenn Kessler admitted that Trump raised the issue but noted that he might have been suggesting the troops “not because he wanted to protect the Capitol,” but to suggest that he and his supporters were being threatened. He added that “Trump brought up the issue on at least three occasions but in such vague and obtuse ways that no senior official regarded his words as an order.”

However, the issue is not whether Trump issued “an order” but made an offer that was declined. For those of us who were covering the event on that day, the question has always been prominent in our minds. I was critical of Trump’s speech while he was still giving it. However, before the Capitol was breached, I also noted that I had never seen the Capitol so thinly protected in a major protest.

We had just seen violent protests outside of the White House with a large number of police officers injured and extensive property damage, including arson. President Trump and his family had to be moved to a secure location out of concern of an imminent breach of the White House. National Guard were deployed and fencing installed.

Even without an offer, it remains unclear why the violence around the White House did not prompt Congress to install the same barriers and deploy the same troops. (They ultimately took both steps but only after the rioters gained entry into the Capitol).

Moreover, if an offer was clearly made, it undermines the allegations that Trump was actively seeking an insurrection. While he has never been charged with an insurrection or even incitement, that allegation was used more recently to support his disqualification from the ballots in Colorado, Maine, and Illinois.

The transcript contains the testimony of former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s interview on January 2022 with Cheney present. Ornato states that he clearly recalled the offer of 10,000 troops being made by Trump in a conversation with D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser:

“I was there, and he was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed. Because I think it was the concern of anti and pro groups clashing is what I recall…I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, the President wants to make sure that you have enough. You know, he is willing to ask for 10,000. I remember that number.”

Ornato said that Browser said that they would not need the troops. (She ultimately asked for only 300 troops). There are also reports that then Speaker Nancy Pelosi was worried about the “optics” of military reinforcements at the Capitol.

Ornato also said that he recalled that, after Bowser refused additional National Guard members, the White House requested the Defense Department have a “quick reaction force” ready on that day. He gave details on meetings with the Defense Department and follow up from Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

Hemingway noted in her report that Ornato’s testimony was supported by former Trump administration aide Kash Patel. Cheney has attacked Patel as unreliable.

Ornato also testified that Meadows and others were frustrated by the delay in getting those troops to the Hill. The delay was blamed on the logistics, not some conspiracy to enable or facilitate an insurrection.

The Federalist article makes additional allegations, including that Cheney was behind an op-ed by her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, opposing any use of national guard troops on January 6th.

However, even proving such duplicity would hardly be news for Washington. Likewise, it does not negate criticism over Trump’s comments on that day or his delay in publicly calling for supporters to withdraw.

Yet, again, what is more important historically  is whether the J6 Committee had direct evidence that Trump made the offer of thousands of troops and that the White House pushed for rapid deployment troops on that day.

I have previously criticized the one-sided J6 Report and the biased framing of the hearings held by the members. The Committee could have been so much more than the echo chamber that it became.  However, this latest transcript adds questions over the perplexing failure of Congress to take obvious steps to prevent a riot.

Had Congress simply installed the same fencing previously used at the White House and deployed such troops, the J6 riot would likely have never occurred. Given the cost and trauma to our nation, we should want to know the full story of what occurred on January 6th.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 15:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/cYhwZP0 Tyler Durden

FBI Chief Tells Lawmakers ‘Don’t Panic’ As Terror Threat Soars Due To Border Invasion

FBI Chief Tells Lawmakers ‘Don’t Panic’ As Terror Threat Soars Due To Border Invasion

Before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, the Federal Bureau of Investigation issued warnings about an Iranian assassin preparing to kill former and current US government officials. At the same time, New York City deployed National Guard soldiers armed with machine guns across subway stations.

On Tuesday morning, the head of the FBI, Christopher Wray, told the Senate Intelligence Committee that terrorist threats against the US had reached a “whole other level,” according to Bloomberg. This comes as the migrant invasion, facilitated by the Biden administration, has flooded the nation with millions of unvetted folks from third-world countries, some of whom deeply hate America. 

“You’ve seen a veritable rogue’s gallery of foreign terrorist organizations calling for terrorist attacks against us in a way that we haven’t seen in a long, long time,” Wray warned lawmakers. 

Wray joined other intelligence community leaders in discussing the current security threats facing the US. 

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, reminded Wray that only a handful of terrorists were in the US before the 9/11 attacks that killed more than 3,000 people. 

“I worry that among the people that are coming across the border that are evading law enforcement, that there are some people among those that mean to do us harm. Do you share that concern?” Cornyn asked Wray.

Wray replied: “I do.” 

Wray told lawmakers now “is not the time to panic.” 

He said, “We’re very actively investigating working with DHS [Department of Homeland Security] on both people whose travel was facilitated but also members of the facilitation network in some other way overseas.”

Already, 17 individuals on the FBI’s terror watch list were captured on the border several months ago. The US recently caught a known member of the Somali terror group al-Shabaab

The threat stream that keeps DHS folks up at night emanates from Iran and or Iran-backed groups. Biden’s open border disaster has been an open ticket for terrorist cells to flood the nation.

Recall this US sheriff’s warning last month…

Open borders have compromised our national security. 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 15:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/MRPTrY5 Tyler Durden

OPEC’s Oil Production Rose In February Despite Cut Extension

OPEC’s Oil Production Rose In February Despite Cut Extension

By Charles Kennedy of OilPrice.com

Despite the voluntary production cuts of several major producers of the OPEC+ alliance, OPEC’s oil production rose in February by more than 200,000 barrels per day (bpd) compared to January, driven by higher production in Libya, which is exempted from the OPEC+ supply cuts.

Crude oil production from all OPEC members jumped by 203,000 bpd from January to 26.57 million bpd in February, OPEC’s Monthly Oil Market Report (MOMR) showed on Tuesday.  

The biggest increase in output came from Libya, which has been exempt from the OPEC+ cuts due to its unstable security situation, as well as from Nigeria, which has underperformed compared to its quotas in recent years, due to a lack of investments and frequent sabotages and theft on onshore pipelines.

Libya has restored oil production at its largest oilfield, Sharara, which was shut down for three weeks in January by protesters.

In February, Libya’s oil production rose by 144,000 bpd, while Nigeria’s output increased by 47,000 bpd compared to January.

OPEC’s top producer, Saudi Arabia, produced 8.98 million bpd last month, in line with its pledge to keep output at about 9 million bpd after promising a 1-million-bpd cut that has been in place since last summer.

But the second-biggest producer of the cartel, Iraq, pumped around 200,000 bpd more than its pledge to keep production at 4 million bpd, as it only reduced output by 14,000 bpd, according to the secondary sources in OPEC’s report. Iraq’s oil production averaged 4.2 million bpd last month, per the sources.  

Some OPEC+ producers, including Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Algeria, announced earlier this month they would roll over their production cuts – initially for the first quarter – into the second quarter, too. They are joined in this OPEC+ effort by non-OPEC producers Russia, Kazakhstan, and Oman.  

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 15:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/qHX2FQ4 Tyler Durden

Biden Says He’s “Counting On The Border Action Happening By Itself”

Biden Says He’s “Counting On The Border Action Happening By Itself”

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Joe Biden gave perhaps his most baffling comments on the border to date Monday when he told a reporter that he is “counting on” some action to fix the crisis at the border to “happen by itself.”

Following another disastrous appearance in New Hampshire, more to follow, Biden stopped on the tarmac before shuffling up the small steps into Air Force One.

“When is a border executive action coming?” a reporter asked Biden.

“I’m counting on the border action happening by itself,” Biden responded.

What?

Those 94 executive actions he took shutting down Trump era border policies are just going to reverse themselves are they?

The wide open border is apparently going to close itself if left alone.

In reality this translates as “I’m not going to do anything.”

Earlier, Biden said there just needs to be an “orderly process” at the border. Form an orderly queue and it’ll sort itself out.

At the end of this little meeting, Biden asked his handlers if he was “allowed to take questions.” The answer was no, the press were quickly ushered away and the feed cut.

Biden was busy Monday. During a speech at the National League of Cities at the Marriott Marquis Washington, he slurred his way through a snorefest speech and then was again cut off by his handlers before he had a chance to go off script.

He attempted a pathetic half jog off the stage as handlers frantically waved him in the right direction:

In New Hampshire, Biden’s brain malfunctioned and he rambled incoherently again:

He called John McCain his “predecessor.” We all must’ve missed when McCain was president.

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 14:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/FoBzhTU Tyler Durden