Another Il-76 Military Transport Plane Goes Down In Russia

Another Il-76 Military Transport Plane Goes Down In Russia

Russia’s Defense Ministry has confirmed that one of its Ilyushin Il-76 military transport planes has crashed in Russia on Tuesday, citing engine failure as the reason which occurred shortly after take-off.

The 15 total people that were on board, including eight crew members and seven passengers, are feared dead amid emergency efforts to reach and assess the crash site. Initial local reports said there were no survivors.

Screengrab of social media footage showing the apparent engine failure.

“An Il-76 military transport aviation plane crashed in the Ivanovo region while taking off to perform a scheduled flight. On board were eight crew members and seven passengers,” the defense ministry statement said.

Russian authorities have been further cited as saying that “the cause of the disaster was a fire in one of the engines during take-off.”

It happened over the Ivanovo region, which lies some 125 miles east of Moscow. Shocking video of the large transport plane flying low with one of its engines shooting flames out of it has widely circulated on social media.

Russia’s state-backed RT has written, “According to media reports, the plane’s pilot was trying to return to the Ivanovo Severny air base but was unable to do so.” That’s when the pilot “apparently diverted the doomed aircraft away from a village, crashing it near a cemetery.”

Video which has been authenticated by state media of the large military transport plane going down:

The Il-76 has been in operation since 1971 when it was produced as the Soviet air force’s main heavy transport plane. It is capable of taking some 140 paratroopers into battle.

Russia is believed to have well over 100 Ilyushin Il-76 military transport planes in service by aerial forces, and they also have civilian use. They’ve been heavily relied upon to transport troops and equipment to and from the Ukraine battlefield over the last two years of war.

Another angle which appears to show parts falling from one of the engines:

Back in January, a major disaster unfolded when an Il-76 went down in the the Belgorod region near the border with Ukraine. Russian authorities said Ukraine forces shot the aircraft down, and 65 Ukrainian POWs who were being transported at the time died.

There were also six crew members and three Russian servicemen who perished, and it resulted also in Moscow accusations that a Western-supplied missile had hit the plane.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 14:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/EXLCup7 Tyler Durden

Buried Project Veritas Recording Shows Top Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech

Buried Project Veritas Recording Shows Top Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech

Submitted by Liam Cosgrove

Former Project Veritas & O’Keefe Media Group operative and Pfizer formulation analyst scientist Justin Leslie revealed previously unpublished recordings showing Pfizer’s top vaccine researchers discussing major concerns surrounding COVID-19 vaccines. Leslie delivered these recordings to Veritas in late 2021, but they were never published:

Featured in Leslie’s footage is Kanwal Gill, a principal scientist at Pfizer. Gill was weary of MRNA technology given its long research history yet lack of approved commercial products. She called the vaccines “sneaky,” suggesting latent side effects could emerge in time.

Gill goes on to illustrate how the vaccine formulation process was dramatically rushed under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization and adds that profit incentives likely played a role:

“It’s going to affect my heart, and I’m going to die. And nobody’s talking about that.”

Leslie recorded another colleague, Pfizer’s pharmaceutical formulation scientist Ramin Darvari, who raised the since-validated concern that repeat booster intake could damage the cardiovascular system:

None of these claims will be shocking to hear in 2024, but it is telling that high-level Pfizer researchers were discussing these topics in private while the company assured the public of “no serious safety concerns” upon the jab’s release:

Vaccine for Children is a Different Formulation

Leslie sent me a little-known FDA-Pfizer conference — a 7-hour Zoom meeting published in tandem with the approval of the vaccine for 5 – 11 year-olds — during which Pfizer’s vice presidents of vaccine research and development, Nicholas Warne and William Gruber, discussed a last-minute change to the vaccine’s “buffer” — from “PBS” to “Tris” — to improve its shelf life. For about 30 seconds of these 7 hours, Gruber acknowledged that the new formula was NOT the one used in clinical trials (emphasis mine):

“The studies were done using the same volume… but contained the PBS buffer. We obviously had extensive consultations with the FDA and it was determined that the clinical studies were not required because, again, the LNP and the MRNA are the same and the behavior — in terms of reactogenicity and efficacy — are expected to be the same.

According to Leslie, the tweaked “buffer” dramatically changed the temperature needed for storage: “Before they changed this last step of the formulation, the formula was to be kept at -80 degrees Celsius. After they changed the last step, we kept them at 2 to 8 degrees celsius,” Leslie told me.

The claims are backed up in the referenced video presentation:

I’m no vaccinologist but an 80-degree temperature delta — and a 5x shelf-life in a warmer climate — seems like a significant change that might warrant clinical trials before commercial release.

Despite this information technically being public, there has been virtually no media scrutiny or even coverage — and in fact, most were told the vaccine for children was the same formula but just a smaller dose — which is perhaps due to a combination of the information being buried within a 7-hour jargon-filled presentation and our media being totally dysfunctional.

Bohemian Grove?

Leslie’s 2-hour long documentary on his experience at both Pfizer and O’Keefe’s companies concludes on an interesting note: James O’Keefe attended an outing at the Bohemian Grove.

Leslie offers this photo of James’ Bohemian Grove “GATE” slip as evidence, left on his work desk atop a copy of his book, “American Muckraker”:

My thoughts on the Bohemian Grove: my good friend’s dad was its general manager for several decades. From what I have gathered through that connection, the Bohemian Grove is not some version of the Illuminati, at least not in the institutional sense.

Do powerful elites hangout there? Absolutely. Do they discuss their plans for the world while hanging out there? I’m sure it has happened. Do they have a weird ritual with a giant owl? Yep, Alex Jones showed that to the world.

My perspective is based on conversations with my friend and my belief that his father is not lying to him. I could be wrong and am open to evidence — like if boxer Ryan Garcia decides to produce evidence regarding his rape claims — and I do find it a bit strange the club would invite O’Keefe who is notorious for covertly filming, but Occam’s razor would lead me to believe the club is — as it was under my friend’s dad — run by boomer conservatives the extent of whose politics include disliking wokeness, immigration, and Biden (common subjects of O’Keefe’s work).

Therefore, I don’t find O’Keefe’s visit to the club indicative that he is some sort of Operation Mockingbird asset as Leslie tries to depict (however Mockingbird is a 100% legitimate conspiracy). I have also met James several times and even came close to joining OMG. While I disagreed with James on the significance of many of his stories — finding some to be overhyped and showy — I never doubted his conviction in them.

As for why Leslie’s story was squashed… all my sources told me it was to avoid jail time for Veritas executives.

Feel free to watch Leslie’s full documentary here and decide for yourself.

Fun fact — Justin Leslie was also the operative behind this mega-viral Project Veritas story where Pfizer’s director of R&D claimed the company was privately mutating COVID-19 behind closed doors:

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 13:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/hdRlui6 Tyler Durden

Ugly, Tailing 10Y Auction Sees Lowest Foreign Demand Of 2024

Ugly, Tailing 10Y Auction Sees Lowest Foreign Demand Of 2024

After yesterday’s stellar, stopping through 3Y auction, moments ago the Treasury completed its 10Y reopening of 9-year, 11-month Cusip JZ5, in an auction that was mediocre at best.

The high yield of 4.166% was above last month’s 4.093% (in fact it was the highest 10Y auction stop of 2024), and also tailed the When Issued 4.157% by 0.9bps, the biggest tail since December 2023.

The bid to cover was 2.51, a drop from last month’s 2.56 and the lowest since November 2023; it was also below the six-auction average of 2.52.

The internals were also subpar with foreign buyers less excited as Indirects took down just 64.3%, down from 71.0% last month and the lowest since December, not to mention below the 66.2% recent average. And with Directs awarded 18.6%, up from 16.1% last month, Dealers were left holding just 17.1%, up notably from last month’s 13.0%

Overall, this was an ugly, tailing auction despite the generous concession which saw 10Y yields move almost 10bps higher on the day after the hotter than expected CPI print, which while slamming bonds did just the opposite for stocks where both good news and bad news just serves to drive equities higher.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 13:27

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/p0C3Z9T Tyler Durden

‘Weekend In Ohio’: Two Women Charged With “Gross Abuse Of A Corpse” After Driving Dead Man To Bank To Make Withdrawal

‘Weekend In Ohio’: Two Women Charged With “Gross Abuse Of A Corpse” After Driving Dead Man To Bank To Make Withdrawal

The plot to ‘Weekend at Bernie’s’ playout this past week in Ohio when two women reportedly “propped up a dead man in their car to withdraw hundreds of dollars from his bank account”, according to a report from the NY Post and the Star Beacon

When they were done with the dead man, they dropped his corpse off at a local hospital, the report says. 

Ashtabula Police Chief Robert Stell told the Star Beacon: “Before dropping him off they went through a bank drive-thru with him propped up in the passenger seat so that the teller could see him. … They tried to withdraw money from his account. The bank had allowed this previously as long as they were accompanied by him.”

The women managed to withdraw “about $900”, according to the Post. 

When the women brought the dead man, 80 year old Douglas Layman to the emergency room, the medical staff were initially unaware of his identity.

However, authorities later managed to track down Loreen Bea Feralo, 55, and Karen Casbohm, 63, who dropped the body off and were able to identify him. They reported that he had passed away at his residence in Ashtabula, as per the police records.

Feralo was “convicted of reckless assault, possession of drug paraphernalia, criminal trespass, driving under the influence, theft and attempted possession of drugs,” the NY Post wrote. The women were also charged with theft and gross abuse of a corpse, the report says. 

Ashtabula Prosecuting Attorney Cecilia Cooper commented: “We filed charges against two women. Karen Casbohm and Loreen Bea Feralo were charged with gross abuse of a corpse and theft.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 13:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/sVLwHm7 Tyler Durden

US Gasoline Prices Rise For The Second Consecutive Week

US Gasoline Prices Rise For The Second Consecutive Week

By Charles Kennedy of OilPrice.com

U.S. gasoline prices rose for a second week in a row, to average $3.40 per gallon on Monday, up by 6.2 cents from a week ago, amid rising demand, ongoing refinery maintenance, and the switch to summer gasoline, GasBuddy said today.

Still, the national average price of regular gasoline is 4.5 cents per gallon lower than a year ago, said GasBuddy, which has compiled price data from more than 12 million individual price reports covering over 150,000 gas stations.

The national average price of diesel, on the other hand, has fallen by 1.3 cents in the past week and stands at $4.02 per gallon on Monday, which is 30 cents lower than this time last year, according to GasBuddy’s data.

American drivers could be in for some relief in the coming weeks, due to a rise in U.S. refinery utilization in the most recent week, and a possible earlier end to refinery maintenance, said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy.

“The national average price of gasoline has seen a continued but measured rise compared to last week, but the pace of increases has slowed slightly in the last few days. With government data showing a rise in refinery utilization last week, there may be some good news on the horizon for drivers,” De Haan said.

“Much of the seasonal rise that happens this time of year is a culmination of refinery maintenance, the switch to summer gasoline, and rising demand,” the expert noted.

The changeover is still ongoing so the upward trend is likely to persist, but higher refinery output could ease some of the upward pressure on gasoline prices, according to De Haan.

More expensive international crude prices are also to blame for the rise in U.S. gasoline prices, AAA said last week.

“Spring is nearly here, with longer days, better weather, and more opportunities to hit the road,” AAA spokesperson Andrew Gross said.

“And we are seeing this reflected in rising gasoline demand. But remember, we see this trend every year.”    

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 13:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/4XfuBae Tyler Durden

Biden’s Budget Is Unmitigated Bull**it

Biden’s Budget Is Unmitigated Bull**it

Following yesterday’s release of Biden’s $7.3 trillion budget, the Biden administration bragged about lowering the deficit by $3 trillion over the next decade – an average of 0.8% of GDP over that period. 

This would consist of roughly $2.6 trillion over 10 years in additional spending programs, offset by around $4.8 trillion in tax increases over the same period. Most of the tax and spending proposals have been included in prior budget proposals from the White House, according to Goldman’s Alec Phillips, however there are several new items.

The budget would increase the corporate alternative minimum tax on book income from 15% to 21%, raising $137 billion over the next decade. It also limits a corporation’s ability to deduct employee pay exceeding $1mm/year, raising $272 billion over 10 years. The largest proposed tax increases include; raising the corporate minimum tax from 21% to 28%, as well as a series of tax increases on high-income earners, including new Medicare taxes, and a new 25% minimum tax on incomes over $100 million, raising $500 billion over the next decade.

Of course, it has zero chance of passing under the current Congress – but that’s not the point.

As one DC strategist wrote in a morning email noted by CNBC‘s Brian Sullivan, the budget deficit will still grow by another $16 trillion over the next decadeand that’s with aforementioned tax hikes.

Without them, the deficit grows to $19 trillion.

In short, talk of ‘$3 trillion saved’ is total bullshit in the grand scheme of things, given how much the national debt will grow in the best case scenario.

“No family budget or business could exist with this kind of math,” says Sullivan.

Sullivan noted earlier that our incompetent, spendthrift government has added 60% to the national debt since 2018 alone.

This is fine…

 

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 12:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/alcrvtO Tyler Durden

One Career Economist Exposes The Lies Of Modern Economics

One Career Economist Exposes The Lies Of Modern Economics

By Michael Every of Rabobank

Damascene Conversion

Today is all about US CPI. I’m not sure why given markets, and President Biden(!), believe G7 central banks –except Japan– are going to cut rates soon, despite: sticky services inflation; the Red Sea crisis not being ‘In Deep Blip’; other brewing geopolitical crises, from fears of Iranian nukes to Armenia asking to join the EU(!); our base case of a Trump election victory, with inflationary higher tariffs forcing the Fed to stop cuts; and what’s trying to play out in the global financial architecture, which gold and Bitcoin point to.

Nonetheless, when you get messages like this:

  • *ECB’S KAZIMIR: UPSIDE RISKS TO INFLATION ARE “ALIVE AND KICKING.”

  • *ECB’S KAZIMIR: DISCUSSIONS ON EASING SHOULD ALREADY START, THE ECB WILL USE THE WEEKS AHEAD FOR THAT.

… it’s clear what the direction of travel is, regardless of how logical that is.

Pre-CPI, there are things to think about. Like the Boeing whistleblower who apparently decided to shoot himself dead in-between damaging testimony underlining why their planes keep falling apart. Or former US Attorney General Lynch allegedly lobbying the Pentagon on behalf of a Chinese drone maker. Or former senior Trump aide Conway lobbying Congress on behalf of TikTok. Or Peter Turchin, of Cliodynamics fame, telling the Financial Times that the US is in a much more “perilous state” than Russia.

Bridging the thrust of those stories and CPI itself, allow me to share news of a Damascene conversion from Angus Deaton, Emeritus Professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton. Writing on the IMF website, he argues ‘Questioning one’s views as circumstances evolve can be a good thing.’ As Keynes put it, by contrast, “what do you do?” (‘Become a lobbyist’ appears one answer.)

Specifically, Deaton notes, “The [economics] profession knows and understands many things. Yet today we are in some disarray. We did not collectively predict the financial crisis and, worse still, we may have contributed to it… Recent macroeconomic events… have seen quarrelling experts whose main point of agreement is the incorrectness of others. Economics Nobel Prize winners have been known to denounce each other’s work at the ceremonies in Stockholm.” Yes, and some of us laugh at the Stockholm Syndrome process. As a result, he adds, “I have recently found myself changing my mind, a discomfiting process for someone who has been a practicing economist for more than half a century.”

Notably, he does not include “the corruption allegations that have become common… Even so, economists, who have prospered mightily over the past half century, might fairly be accused of having a vested interest in capitalism as it currently operates.” Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely: who knew?

Yet Deaton notes economics is clearly wrong on:

  • Power: “Our emphasis on the virtues of free, competitive markets and exogenous technical change can distract us from the importance of power in setting prices and wages, in choosing the direction of technical change, and in influencing politics to change the rules of the game. Without an analysis of power, it is hard to understand inequality or much else in modern capitalism.” 100% true. 100% ignored.

  • Philosophy and ethics: “In contrast to economists from Smith and Marx through Keynes, Hayek, and even Friedman, we have largely stopped thinking about ethics and about what constitutes human well-being. We are technocrats who focus on efficiency. We get little training about the ends of economics…. When pressed, we usually fall back on an income-based utilitarianism. We often equate well-being with money or consumption, missing much of what matters to people… when efficiency comes with upward redistribution…our recommendations become little more than a license for plunder.” I’m shocked there is gambling in Casablanca!

  • Empirical methods: “Historians, who understand about contingency and about multiple and multidirectional causality, often do a better job than economists of identifying important mechanisms that are plausible, interesting, and worth thinking about, even if they do not meet the inferential standards of contemporary applied economics.” It depends on the historian, but absolutely.

  • Humility: “We are often too sure that we are right. Economics has powerful tools that can provide clear-cut answers, but that require assumptions that are not valid under all circumstances. It would be good to recognize that there are almost always competing accounts and learn how to choose between them.” Wouldn’t it!

So, Deaton is having second thoughts.

He’s now pro-, not anti-union, and notes they “need to be at the table for decisions about AI. Economists’ enthusiasm for technical change as the instrument of universal enrichment is no longer tenable (if it ever was).”

He’s sceptical of the benefits of free trade to US workers and “the claim… that globalization was responsible for the vast reduction in global poverty over the past 30 years. I also no longer defend the idea that the harm done to working Americans by globalization was a reasonable price to pay for global poverty reduction because workers in America are so much better off than the global poor. I believe that the reduction in poverty in India had little to do with world trade. And poverty reduction in China could have happened with less damage to workers in rich countries if Chinese policies caused it to save less of its national income… I had also seriously underthought my ethical judgments about trade-offs between domestic and foreign workers. We certainly have a duty to aid those in distress, but we have additional obligations to our fellow citizens that we do not have to others.”

Deaton is also rethinking immigration. “I used to subscribe to the near consensus among economists that immigration to the US was a good thing, with great benefits to the migrants and little or no cost to domestic low-skilled workers. I no longer think so. Economists’ beliefs… are shaped by econometric designs that may be credible but often rest on short-term outcomes. Longer-term analysis over the past century and a half tells a different story. Inequality was high when America was open, was much lower when the borders were closed, and rose again post…1965 as the fraction of foreign-born people rose back to its levels in the Gilded Age.”

He then concludes that “Economists could benefit by greater engagement with the ideas of philosophers, historians, and sociologists, just as Smith once did.” Except Smith was a moral philosopher we paint as an economist. There’s a big difference. Deaton adds, “The philosophers, historians, and sociologists would likely benefit too.” But only if economists think in the broader terms the authors of the Classical period did – or like Turchin does today.

As an example of how this isn’t the case –on top of the downsizing > outsourcing > “Oops, no national security!”, or “Oops, my products fall apart!” news around us– a leading UK university just shut down an associate professor for asking questions with an internal email rejecting her appeal to freedom of speech that read: “Note that I am an economist and modeller and have no idea who John Stuart Mill is”(!) Indeed, how many working economists today know Mill, Marx, Smith, or any of the classical economists?

Keeping it neoclassical instead, could we draw a correlation between those who don’t read the classics and how inaccurate their long-run economic forecasts keep proving to be? I know what the R2 there is. But no time to do it, of course. We have CPI to wait for.

That’s as Portugal shifts to the right, with one in five voting for the far right; The Economist runs an op-ed from Trump’s former USTR Lighthizer arguing in favour of US tariffs, pointing out the faulty mainstream economic assumptions saying they don’t work; China ups the ante on its own mercantilism further, to G7 pushback and Global South applause; and Australians are spending half their income on their mortgages, yet rate cuts will likely see house prices rise to offset (someone needs to read Henry George).

Yes, ‘Questioning one’s views as circumstances evolve can be a good thing‘. And what do you do?

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 12:20

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/m9WG63C Tyler Durden

The Purge: Election Year – Team Trump Axes 60+ RNC Staffers

The Purge: Election Year – Team Trump Axes 60+ RNC Staffers

On its very first day in control of the Republican National Committee following last week’s takeover, Team Trump wasted no time as it ventures to reshape the RNC in Trump’s image — immediately bringing the axe down on more than 60 of the organization’s 200-some staffers. Vendors are also bracing for possible terminations of their RNC relationships. 

“[The new leadership is] in the process of evaluating the organization and staff to ensure the building is aligned” with its vision, said new RNC chief operating officer Sean Cairncross in an email to staff. 

Among those whose career blood is splattered on the walls of RNC headquarters are five senior staffersincluding the leaders of the political, communications and data teams. Some employees are being asked to resign but with an opportunity to reapply for their jobs. “If you choose to not reapply, your last day of employment will be March 31,” wrote Cairncross. In a possible indication of the new leadership’s urgency to reorganize the party, Cairncross’s own name was misspelled on his email.  

Last week, RNC members voted to put Trump’s endorsed candidates in command. North Carolina GOP chair Michael Whatley is now the RNC chairman, Trump daughter-in-law Lara Trump is co-chair and Trump senior campaign adviser Chris LaCivita is the chief operations officer.  

New RNC chair Michael Whatley and co-chair Lara Trump (Michael Wyke/Associated Press)

The RNC renovation isn’t just about achieving Trumpist purity — it’s also aimed at cost-cutting: 

Trump advisers have described the RNC’s structure as overly bloated and bureaucratic, which they believe has contributed to the party’s cash woes. The RNC had about $8 million at the end of December, only about one-third as much as the Democratic National Committee. – Politico

The new organization will consolidate some functions — such as fundraising, communications and data — into a single department. The finance and digital teams are likely to move to Palm Beach, where Trump’s reelection campaign is headquartered, an insider tells the New York Times

Lara Trump told Fox News the RNC will focus on three pillars to ensure a winning November: “Turn out the vote, protect the vote, and raise money, but I would argue that maybe the most important of those three is protecting the vote; election integrity.” 

The RNC has already established an election integrity division, she said, and will augment it with a nationwide network of volunteers, to include poll-watchers, poll-workers and lawyers, adding, “We can never allow what happened in 2020 and the questions surrounding that election to ever happen again.”

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 12:00

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/ugnSlTA Tyler Durden

Uranium hasn’t been this critical since the days of Oppenheimer

If you saw Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster Oppenheimer, you might remember the scene in which Dr. Oppenheimer travels to Chicago to meet with physicist Enrico Fermi, who had just achieved the world’s first ever self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction.

This really happened– it was December 2, 1942, and Enrico Fermi’s experiment was a massive scientific breakthrough.

Fermi and his team proved that a fission reaction could be controlled… and therefore the vast amount of energy inside of an atom’s nucleus could be harnessed for other purposes.

Obviously, the US government was singularly focused on turning that immense nuclear energy into the biggest bomb the world had ever seen. But Fermi’s discovery also paved the way for nuclear power.

Proponents envisioned a world powered by nuclear energy where the cost of electricity would be practically free… and the benefits to mankind incalculable.

It all came down to efficiency; the amount of nuclear power that could be generated from a single rock of uranium was equivalent to thousands of tons of coal in a conventional power plant.

The cost of electricity would plummet. And that cheap energy would mean that consumers would pay far less for utilities, saving plenty of money that could be put to other uses.

Cheap energy also means that the production costs of just about everything would fall; cars, houses, food, etc. all become cheaper.

Cheap energy also helps countries develop more rapidly and increase economic growth, resulting in greater national prosperity and more tax revenue for the government.

The promise of nuclear energy was extraordinary– it was a win/win/win. So naturally when other nations began to develop the technology on their own, it set off an arms race to stockpile as much uranium as possible– mostly to ensure that no one else could make weapons.

The United States government bought up entire warehouses full of it and made an exclusive deal with the Belgian Congo (which had the world’s largest uranium reserves), simply to make sure that other countries couldn’t get their hands on any nuclear fuel.

Then, over the years, the US government slowly sold down its uranium inventory, little by little.

Mining companies also added new supply to the uranium market, ensuring there was plenty of uranium to meet growing demand.

But then a series of infamous accidents took place– Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, etc. The public freaked out, and the entire nuclear power industry nearly vanished.

Now, an objective analysis shows that, any way you slice it, far more people have died from accidents related to coal, oil, natural gas, and other forms of electricity production than have ever died from nuclear power accidents.

In fact, more people have died from accidents related to wind power than have died from nuclear.

But nuclear power still suffered a terrible blow to its reputation, and it remained that way for a very, very long time.

Power companies scrapped their plans for new nuclear power plants, and the demand for uranium collapsed, prompting many mining companies to shut down their operations.

The existing nuclear power plants that remained in business, however, continued buying uranium from the government… so those stockpiles from the 1950s continued to dwindle.

And that takes us to today: nuclear is finally making a comeback.

Unfortunately, most of the West (as usual) is missing the boat; the vast majority of new reactors will be in China, India, and other rapidly growing nations who understand that no other energy technology offers the same advantages as nuclear.

Western politicians are still stuck in their idiotic, Dark Age beliefs that wind and solar are the way to go. But these are both completely inefficient and extremely expensive technologies.

The amount of energy it takes to produce solar panels relative to the electricity that solar panels actually generate is a laughable pittance; this is known as ‘Energy Return on Energy Invested’, or EROEI… and with nuclear power, it’s off the charts.

Plus, nuclear power also has one of the lowest levels of CO2 emissions of any energy source.

(It’s also worth noting that emerging nuclear reactor technology promises to slash costs even further of establishing a new nuclear plant and increase safety even more.)

This means that nuclear has the potential to provide massive economic AND environmental benefits. Virtually no other technology has that capability… which is why it’s only a matter of time before the world ‘rediscovers’ nuclear.

Again, it’s already happening in Asia. In fact, it’s possible to literally count all the planned / in-progress nuclear power plants that will be coming on line in the next few years, and then estimate the annual uranium demand.

One of the best researchers in this field, by far, is my colleague Adam Rozencwajg, who has spoken at a few of our Total Access events; Adam has gone through the trouble to count up all the new reactors and their projected uranium needs, and the answer is very clear:

Bottom line, uranium demand is set to skyrocket. Yet supply isn’t going anywhere, not for a while.

It takes many years to get a new uranium mine up and running– sometimes even longer than it takes to build a new nuclear power plant.

So, you can see how there’s likely going to be a massive imbalance in uranium supply and demand.

I first started talking about uranium in September of 2022 when spot prices hovered around $40 per pound.

Today, uranium trades for more than $90 per pound. But I think it could go much, much higher from here.

In fact, global uranium demand already exceeds new mining production. In the past, whenever this happened, there were always vast government stockpiles to keep the power plants supplied.

But now the government stockpiles have dwindled. So, we could easily see a major uranium shortage… and prices go through the roof.

Source

from Schiff Sovereign https://ift.tt/U46bAR7
via IFTTT

Peter Schiff: Gold Is The Canary In The Economic Coal-Mine

Peter Schiff: Gold Is The Canary In The Economic Coal-Mine

Via SchiffGold.com,

This weekend, Todd Sachs interviewed Peter on the state of the economy. They discuss the parallels between now and the 2007-2008 housing crisis, the role of economic sentiment in voters’ opinions, and why foreign central banks are losing faith in the dollar.

Peter opens with the fact that the United States is probably in a recession already, even though the government statistics say otherwise:

“We’re in a recession. I don’t care what the statistics are showing, and they’re very likely to be revised in the future to confirm that we’re in a recession right now. I mean that’s what happened with the Great Recession, which started in December of ‘07. But for a year the government gave out fake economic data, and then in December of ‘08, they came back and said, ‘Oh, by the way, we’ve been in a recession for an entire year. You can throw away all the data we gave you because it was wrong.’”

American voters are not swayed by government reports, and they blame the current administration for the state of the economy:

“When they poll the voters, where Biden scores lowest is on the economy! … The voters are saying this despite— as you said— being inundated every day with regurgitated propaganda from the mainstream media about how great the economy is. So imagine if the media told the truth!

…You’ve got to trust your eyes, not the government. I’m not going to walk outside in the rain when I know it’s raining just because some government weatherman is trying to convince me it’s sunny.”

America isn’t alone. Other countries around the world are already reaping the consequences of poor policy exercised for the last decade:

“All the countries are experiencing the negative consequences of the same monetary and fiscal policy mistakes. We all made them, especially during COVID. But everybody had interest rates too low. I mean, in Europe and Japan they were negative! .. They didn’t even stop at zero, they went negative! And all these governments ran large deficits, so everybody is paying the price.”

Furthermore, the United States’ use of the dollar as a strategic weapon in foreign policy is leading to greater instability as foreign countries lose trust in their main reserve currency:

“There’s an old expression: you don’t bite the hand that feeds you. We were being fed by nations that were holding onto dollars as their reserves, and then we punished Russia for doing what we wanted them to do, which was hold large US dollar reserves instead of spending those dollars and having them bid up US prices. And they invested those dollars in US treasuries. … We punished the Russians for doing that, and when we did that we sent a clear signal to the rest of the world: ‘You could be next. If you do anything that the United States does not like, this is what’s going to happen to you.’”

This is exactly why gold’s price has risen recently. Foreign central banks losing faith in the dollar are buying more and more gold, and the retail sector is unwittingly dumping their gold when they should be buying more:

People are dumping gold stocks while gold prices are soaring! That’s how clueless people are. They’ve been so dumbed-down by the mainstream media that they don’t know what’s happening, and they’re not doing the proper things financially. … The gold price is not just some other commodity. If gold is really going up, that is the canary in the coal mine. You better get the hell out of that mine, because something bad is going to happen! And the Fed is— of course— ignoring most of these warning signs, and most investors are too.

Peter wraps up the interview with a warning:

If the Fed goes back to buying mortgages, then inflation is going to go even higher. … The credit is going to dry up if rates aren’t allowed to rise to a level that would compensate the lender for what they’re losing to inflation. But look, this is a disaster that the government has created, and it will blame it on everybody else and not accept responsibility. … It’s going to be worse than anything we’ve lived through in either the Great Recession or the COVID times.”

Even Jerome Powell recognizes that American economic policy is unsustainable. When trillions in debt and mistaken foreign policy finally catches up to Uncle Sam, the economy is sure to suffer and may even take the dollar with it.

Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/12/2024 – 11:40

via ZeroHedge News https://ift.tt/d7lzL1g Tyler Durden