People argue about whether the “consensus” of
scientists is that we face disaster because of global warming.
Instead of debating whether man’s greenhouse gasses will raise
temperatures, we should argue about how we gauge disasters, argues
John Stossel. And instead of talking about “climate change”—of
which there will always be some, with or without human influence—we
should focus on “climate catastrophe,” weather that actually kills
people. Those catastrophes, measured in lost lives, are getting
rarer.
from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1IAT5U4
via IFTTT