An Establishment In Panic

Submitted by Patrick Buchanan via Buchanan.org,

Donald Trump “appeals to racism.”

 

“[F]rom the beginning … his campaign has profited from voter prejudice and hatred” and represents an “authoritarian assault upon democracy.”

 

If Speaker Paul Ryan wishes to be “on the right side of history … he must condemn Mr. Trump clearly and comprehensively. The same goes for every other Republican leader.”

 

“Maybe that would split the (Republican) party,” but, “No job is worth the moral stain that would come from embracing (Trump). No party is worth saving at the expense of the country.”

 

If Republican leaders wish to be regarded as moral, every one of them must renounce Trump, even if it means destroying their party.

Who has laid down this moral mandate? The Holy Father in Rome?

No. The voice posturing as the conscience of America is the Washington Post, which champions abortion on demand and has not, in the memory of this writer, endorsed any Republican for president – though it did endorse Marion Barry three times for mayor of D.C.

Anticipating the Post’s orders, Sen. Marco Rubio has been painting Trump as a “scam artist” and “con artist,” with an “orange” complexion, a “spray tan” and “tiny hands,” who is “unfit to lead the party of Lincoln and Reagan.”

The establishment is loving Rubio, and the networks are giving him more airtime. And Rubio is reciprocating, promising that, even if defeated in his home state of Florida on March 15, he will drive his pickup across the country warning against the menace of Trump.

Rubio, however, seems not to have detected the moral threat of Trump, until polls showed Rubio being wiped out on Super Tuesday and in real danger of losing Florida.

Mitt Romney has also suddenly discovered what a fraud and phony is the businessman-builder whose endorsement he so avidly sought and so oleaginously accepted in Las Vegas in 2012.

Before other Republicans submit to the ultimatum of the Post, and of the columnists and commentators pushing a “Never Trump” strategy at the Cleveland convention, they should ask themselves: For whom is it that they will be bringing about party suicide?

That the Beltway elites, whose voice is the Post, hate and fear Trump is not only undeniable, it is understandable.

The Post beat the drums for the endless Mideast wars that bled and near bankrupted the country. Trump will not start another.

The Post welcomes open borders that bring in millions to continue the endless expansion of the welfare state and to change the character of the country we grew up in. Trump will build the wall and repatriate those here illegally.

Trump threatens the trade treaties that enable amoral transnational corporations to ship factories and jobs overseas to produce cheaply abroad and be rid of American employees who are ever demanding better wages and working conditions.

What does the Post care about trade deals that deindustrialize America when the advertising dollars of the big conglomerates are what make Big Media fat and happy?

The political establishment in Washington depends on Wall Street and K Street for PAC money and campaign contributions. Wall Street and K Street depend on the political establishment to protect their right to abandon America for the greener pastures abroad.

Before March 15, when Florida and Ohio vote and the fates of Rubio and Gov. John Kasich are decided, nothing is likely to stop the ferocious infighting of the primaries.

But after March 15, the smoke will have cleared.

If Trump has fallen short of a glide path to the nomination, the war goes on. But if Trump seems to be the near-certain nominee, it will be a time for acceptance, a time for a cease-fire in this bloodiest of civil wars in the GOP.

Otherwise, the party will kick away any chance of keeping Hillary Clinton out of the White House, and perhaps kick away its future as well.

While the depth and rancor of the divisions in the party are apparent, so also is the opportunity. For the turnout in the Republican primaries and caucuses has not only exceeded expectations, it has astonished and awed political observers.

A new “New Majority” has been marching to the polls and voting Republican, a majority unlike any seen since the 49-state landslides of the Nixon and Reagan eras.

If this energy can be maintained, if those throngs of Republican voters can be united in the fall, then the party can hold Congress, capture the While House and reconstitute the Supreme Court.

Come the ides of March, the GOP is going to be in need of its uniters and its statesmen. But today, all Republicans should ask themselves:

Are these folks coming out in droves to vote Republican really the bigoted, hateful and authoritarian people of the Post’s depiction?

 

Or is this not the same old Post that has poured bile on conservatives for generations now in a panic that America’s destiny may be torn away from it and restored to its rightful owners?


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1TZLNiJ Tyler Durden

Liberty Links 3/4/16

Below are links to some of the more interesting and important reads I came across today, but will not be publishing on in detail.

Hillary Clinton Turned $1,000 Into $99,540, White House Says (1994 article…some things never change, New York Times)

The Growing Risk of Civil War in Turkey (This country is a total basket case, Washington Post)

Donald Trump’s Policies Are Not Anathema to U.S. Mainstream but an Uncomfortable Reflection of It (Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept)

Susan Sarandon Says Bernie Sanders’ Hollywood Backers Are “Afraid” to Be More Vocal (Total cowards, Hollywood Reporter)

If It Comes Down to Trump or Clinton, Is It Unpatriotic to Abstain? Ralph Nader Has a Better Idea (Huffington Post)

See More Links »

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1Rtv6Yr
via IFTTT

Gallup: “The Amount Of Debt Americans Carry Is Staggering And Grows Every Day”

And the revelations just keep on coming.

One day after the St. Louis Fed spent thousands in taxpayer funds to “discover” that, gasp, “consumers across the country are borrowing more to buy cars and go to school“, yes really…

… today it’s Gallup’s turn to point out what has been abundantly clear to all non-economist types, and is the reason why the so-called recovery remains nothing but a myth, namely that “Americans Are Buried Under a Mountain of Debt.”

More from John Gleming:

  • Americans who don’t have enough to live comfortably carry higher credit card balances
  • Those who enjoy spending money more than saving money carry more credit card debt
  • Student loan debt associated with highest level of indebtedness

The amount of debt Americans carry is staggering and grows every day.

A prior article explored the kinds and amounts of consumer debt that Americans carry, other than mortgages. Gallup found that only a subset of Americans carries the bulk of consumer debt. This article examines how consumer debt affects different groups of Americans, especially millennials.

Those Without Enough to Live Comfortably Are Using Credit Cards to Supplement Their Resources

Two-thirds of Americans say they have enough money to live comfortably, with more traditionalists (76%) and baby boomers (67%) saying they do than millennials (62%) and Gen Xers (61%).

1_Resources

Those who say they don’t have enough money to live comfortably appear to be using their credit cards to supplement their available resources with high-interest credit. It seems that though their total consumer debt balances are 17% lower than those of Americans who say that they do have enough money to live comfortably, across all generations except traditionalists, Americans who say that they don’t have enough money to live comfortably carry 36% larger credit card balances than those who say that they do have enough money.

The difference is particularly acute among millennials, where those who say that they don’t have enough money to live comfortably carry three times more credit card debt than those who say they do have enough money. Millennials who say they don’t have enough money to live comfortably also carry more auto loan debt and personal loan debt than millennials who say they do have enough money. Millennials are the only generation where those who say that they don’t have enough money to live comfortably carry 8% more total consumer debt than those who say they do have enough money.

Do Americans Enjoy Saving Money or Spending Money More?

Gallup has been tracking whether Americans enjoy saving money or spending money more since 2001. In 2001, 48% of Americans enjoyed spending money more than saving it. The preference for spending money remained at 48% in 2005 and then began a decline, which accelerated during the Great Recession.

At the height of the Great Recession in 2009, just 39% of Americans enjoyed spending money more than saving it. The low point for a preference to spend came in 2014, when just 35% said they enjoyed spending money more than saving it. In 2015, the spending preference crept back up to 37%. In the current research, 39% of Americans said they enjoy spending money more than saving it, while the remaining 61% enjoy saving money more. Neither of these percentages differs appreciably by generation.

2_Save_spend

Those who say they enjoy spending money more tend to earn more but also carry more debt.

Among the generations, those who enjoy spending money more includes a higher proportion of those making $48,000 per year or more than does the group of those who prefer saving money, who include a larger share of those making less than $48,000. The average annual income for spenders is just over $78,500, 9% higher than it is for savers at just over $72,000.

The exception is millennials, where the pattern is reversed. Among millennials, savers have a higher proportion of those making $48,000 per year or more than spenders, who have a larger share of those making less than $48,000. Even with this annual income pattern, however, the average annual income of millennial savers is 5% lower than that of millennial spenders.

3_Annual_income

In general, those who enjoy spending money more carry more credit card debt (81% more), more student loan debt (4% more), more auto loan debt (6% more) and more personal loan debt (37% more) than those who prefer saving it.

Generationally, the only exceptions to this pattern are among Gen Xers and baby boomers. Gen Xers who enjoy spending money more carry less student loan (24% less) and less auto loan debt (11% less) but double the credit card debt (102% more) and significantly more personal loan debt (75% more) than savers. And baby boomers who enjoy spending money more carry significantly less personal debt (23% less) than those who prefer saving it.

Among millennials, those who enjoy spending money more carry more credit card debt (58% more), more student loan debt (23% more), more auto loan debt (26% more) and more personal loan debt (18% more) than millennials who prefer saving.

When Gallup compares the differences in income and total consumer debt between those who enjoy spending money more and those who prefer saving it, Gen Xers, baby boomers and traditionalists who enjoy spending money more carry their income difference in additional consumer debt. In other words, the ratio of the difference in total consumer debt divided by the difference in annual income between these two groups is approximately 1.1-to-1 for members of these generations who enjoy spending money more.

For millennial spenders, however, the ratio is 2.5-to-1. In other words, millennial spenders carry 2.5 times more consumer debt than the difference in their annual income compared with savers.

4_Additional_debt_vs_income

Student Loan Debt Associated With Highest Level of Indebtedness

Almost four in 10 Americans enjoy spending money more than saving it, and they carry a larger debt load across the board though their annual income is higher than those who enjoy saving more. And even among individuals who say that they do not have enough money to live comfortably, almost one-third (32%) still enjoy spending money more than saving it, even if it means piling on more debt, especially credit card debt. This group has among the highest levels of credit card debt — 60% higher than everyone else.

Student loan debt — though not extremely widespread — is associated with the highest levels of indebtedness for all generations, but especially for millennials. And as the data illustrate, those with student loan debt are also more likely to take out a car loan, adding to their already-large debt burden.

For those with student loans, that debt accounts for an average of 36% of the person’s annual income, the largest percentage among all types of consumer debt. On average, total consumer debt accounts for 37% of annual income — but it accounts for 57% of annual income among those with student loans. This is a staggering percentage when considered against all other personal financial demands, such as mortgage or rent, food, telecommunications (including Internet and cable), insurance, savings and investments, and fuel and auto maintenance, among other expenses. Precious little is left over for discretionary spending, and until only recently, discretionary spending in America had been shrinking.

Except for millennials, those who enjoy spending money more than saving match the difference in their annual income (over savers) with the additional consumer debt they carry (over savers). Millennial spenders, though, carry 2.5 times more debt than their income difference over savers.

These data suggest that a significant portion of every generation is buried under a mountain of several different kinds of consumer debt. Though sizable slices of each generation carry no debt, the sheer magnitude of how much Americans with debt do owe is a cause for concern.


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1QSOeyu Tyler Durden

Weekend Reading: Is The Bear Market Over Already?

Submitted by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

“The Bear Market Is Dead, Long Live The Bull.” 

You could almost hear the chants from the always bullish biased media this week as the markets ripped higher on “first day of the month” portfolio rebalancing and short-covering by fund managers.

The rally, as discussed this past weekend, was not unexpected:

“The good news is that the market was able to break above 1940, and the 50-dma, which now clears the way for a push to the 1970-1990 where the next levels of resistance will be found.

 

The bad news is that the markets are once again extremely overbought and still confined inside of an overall downtrend.”

(Chart updated through Thursday close)

SP500-MarketUpdate-030416-2

Is this rally, which looks a whole lot like other rallies we have seen repeatedly in recent months, a true return to a bull market? Or is this another trap being set by the bears?

While it is too early to know for sure, with risks still mounted to the downside a little extra caution might not be a bad idea.

This week’s reading list takes a look at various views on the market, economy and what to expect next. What is interesting is that being overly bullish at the moment carries more portfolio risk (loss of capital if you wrong) than being bearish (missing out on early gains).


1) This Is A Suckers Rally by Michael Kahn via Barron’s

“Chip Anderson, president of StockCharts.com, wrote in a recent newsletter to users that current “emotional short-term reactions are really just part of a larger pattern.” According to his analysis, “The market has topped and is generally moving lower based on a rounding top pattern and the downward movement of the 40-week (200-day) moving average.

Michael-Kahn-030316

But Also Read: Bears Have Their Backs Against The Wall by Avi Gilburt via MarketWatch

And Read: Top 10 Reasons Investors Should Sell Now by Doug Kass via Real Clear Markets

2)  March Is Best Chance For Market Rally by Sue Chang via MarketWatch

“March may be the best chance yet for an S&P 500 rally if you ask Jeffrey Saut, chief investment strategist at Raymond James. History and an energy shift at the market’s gut level could be the triggers.

 

Saut believes the stock market bottomed in February. ‘The first week of March should see the market’s ‘internal energy’ rebuilt for another try on the upside,’ he said in a report.”

But Also Read: March Madness by Lance Roberts via RIA

SP500-Best-WorthMonth-Analysis-030116

3) Weak Economic Data Aligns With Market by Chris Ciovacco via Ciovacco Capital

“The shorter-term data tracked by our market model has seen noticeable improvement over the past two weeks. The longer-term picture, looking out weeks and months, continues to be concerning. Therefore, until more meaningful improvement starts to surface, our allocations will continue to have a defensive slant.”

Also Read: Two Reasons Stocks Are Headed Higher by Anthony Mirhaydari via Fiscal Times

But Don’t Miss: 2008 Revisited by Nouriel Roubini via Project Syndicate

4) Three Weeks Later, Gundlach Cashes Out Of Rally by Tyler Durden via Zero Hedge

“In an interview with Reuters Jennifer Ablan after DoubleLine Capital’s February flow figures were released (it was a $2.2 billion inflow) , Gundlach said the firm is now considering closing out some of its long positions in the stocks that they purchased three weeks ago.

 

Is the bond trader now just a closet equities daytrader? We wond’t know, but since the S&P 500 has jumped 8% in that period, why not takes some profits.

 

“That’s what we’re talking about,” Gundlach said about booking some gains after their short-term rally.

 

Gundlach still maintains that the U.S. stock market is in a bear market but had made those equity purchases because the conditions in the second week of February with “wickedly negative equity sentiment were such that risk/reward favored a potential tradable rally and also made such a low allocation less advisable.”

 

The time to buy the dip, however, has passed: “I am bearish. There are just wiggles and jiggles in the markets.

Also Read: The Best Offense Is A Good Defense by Adam Koos via MarketWatch


CHART OF THE DAY: McCellan Oscillator Over 90 by Northman Trader

Northman-McClellan-Oscillator-030316


5) Sunshine, Lollipops And… by Bill Gross via Janus Capital

If negative interest rates fail to generate acceptable nominal growth, then the Milton Friedman/Ben Bernanke concept of helicopter money may be employed. How that could equitably be distributed nationally or worldwide I have no idea, but the opinion columns are mentioning it more and more often, and on Twitter, the “Likes” are increasing in numbers. Can any/all of these policy alternatives save the “system”? We shall find out, but current evidence of the past 7 years’ experience would support only a D+ report card grade. Barely passing. As an investor though – and as a citizen in this election year – you should be aware that our finance based economic system which like the Sun has provided life and productive growth for a long, long time – is running out of fuel and that its remaining time span is something less than 5 billion years.

 

Investment implications? Do not reach for the tantalizing apple of high yield or the low price/ book ratio of bank stocks. Those prices are where they are because of low/negative interest rates. And too, do not reach for the seemingly momentum driven higher prices of Bunds and Treasuries that negative yields have produced. A 30 year Treasury at 2.5% can wipe out your annual income in one day with a 10 basis point increase. And no, you can’t go to a bank and demand your cash for a fear of being labeled a terrorist. Seems like you’re cornered, doesn’t it?

Also Read: This Is Nuts, When’s The Crash by David Keohane via FT Alphaville


OTHER GOOD READS


“Bull markets die with a whimper, not a bang.” – Anonymous


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1X0rhhv Tyler Durden

Stocks Surge On Biggest Bear Market Short-Squeeze Since Nov 2008

They are pulling out all the stops on this one…

 

Another chaotically wild week…

  • Small Caps (Russell 2000) up 4.65% – biggest week since Oct 2014

  • S&P 500 up 3% – best week in 3 months
  • Dow Transports up 3.7% – best week since Dec 2015
  • "Most Shorted" stocks up 8.8% – biggest short squeeze since Nov 2008 (and in 3 weeks "Most Shorted" are up 19.8% – the most ever)

  • HYG (high yield bond ETF) up 2.3% – best week in 5 months (best 3 weeks since Dec 2011)
  • 2Y, 5Y, 10Y, 30Y biggest weekly surge in yields in 4 months
  • 7Y biggest weekly surge in yields in 9 months
  • Aussie Dollar soared 4.25%  – the biggest week since Dec 2011
  • Oil up 9.6% this week – 2nd biggest week since August
  • Oil up 21.2% in 2 weeks – biggest 2 weeks since Jan 2009
  • Copper up 7.2% – biggest week since Dec 2011
  • Gold up 3.5% to 13 month highs
  • Silver up 5.8% – biggest week since May 2015

 

Ahead of China's National People's Congress, Chinese stocks were 'lifted', but as is clear, the intervention was aimed at mega caps and not the tech-heavy small caps of ChiNext and Shenzhen…

 

Which lifted stocks into the payrolls print…and then the chaos began

 

After the initial weakness, stock were panic-bought only to snap at 2pmET on possible Fed limits on banks…Dow tops 17000 at the close, but S&P lost 2000 right at the bell.

 

Still a crazy week… with Trannies and Small Caps dramatically outperforming…

 

Dow 17000

S&P 2000

 

As Most Shorted soared again…

 

Energy & Financials outperformed… but note that when The Fed headlines hit, things stalled…

 

The reaction to payrolls was all over the place…

 

For the first time in 2 months, XIV (inverse VIX ETF) is trading below VXX (VIX ETF)…

 

Treasury yields spiked after the "better-than-expected" jobs data with the belly underperforming in the week (and 2s adn 30s outperforming – though still out 10bps)…

 

5Y yields touched the 50DMA back within their 4 year range…

 

The USD Index dropped (led by strength in EUR and cable, but Aussie Dollar was the big mover)

 

In fact Aussie Dollar was the biggest gainer of all major FX this week – up a shocking 4.25% – the most since Dec 2011, to 8 month highs…

 

Commodities were all on fire this week…But crude just melted up…

 

Gold closed at its highest in 13 months…

 

Finally, we note several risk assets at or near their 200 Day Moving Average: Credit Suisse comments on the slightly uncanny fact that so many risk assets now at their 200DMA (just highlights further the high level of correlation between asset classes).  Brazil is now +26% from its lows and sitting right on its 200d. Glencore +104% from its lows, and on its 200d. Kumba Iron Ore +225% from its lows and on its 200d. Turkish equities +14% from their lows and on the 200d. Copper is only 2% below its 230 level. S&P500 only 1% below its 200d, so perhaps more interesting are two assets that stick out as still having significant upside: OIL 200d is at $43 and finally the ESTOXX AT 3300

 

Charts: Bloomberg


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/21cjEFG Tyler Durden

HY Credit Spreads Have Never Been This High Outside Of A Recession

Today marked the 13th consecutive day of positive HY fund flows (bringing total to $8.6bn)…

 

But as Credit Suisse explains, the nature of this demand is 'different'…

Investors likely using the ETFs as a placeholder for cash in the absence of new supply, with HY issuance down ~74% year on year.

 

With ballooning ETF inflows the past few weeks, the liquid sector has become increasingly vulnerable to ETF cash rotating out upon the availability of new supply.

 

This is particularly a concern now as the visible issuance calendar for the next few months has grown sizeably (~$35bn)

So put another way – given that the calendar is set to pickup, this huge inflow of 'placeholder' cash will flow out of high yield ETFs (pushing prices lower) and into the new issuance.

But, as Edward Altman warns Goldman Sachs, however, that we are already at the end of the benign cycle or nearing it.

We are in the bottom of the 8th or 9th inning, and unless the Fed steps in to add liquidity to the market, which seems unlikely, I don’t expect extra innings.

 

I define a benign cycle as having four ingredients:

  1. default rates below their historical average,
  2. relatively high recovery rates in the event of defaults, making the loss given default low,
  3. low yields, giving borrowers incentives to utilize debt financing, and
  4. ample liquidity. Liquidity is difficult to measure, but in benign cycles, firms of almost any credit quality are able to borrow easily.

Looking at those four factors, three are pointing toward the end of the benign cycle. Recovery rates are below their historical average, mainly driven by the oil and gas sector. Spreads are above their historical average—currently around 750bps in high yield vs. a historical median of about 520bps—meaning that investors are no longer providing capital at cheap rates; and liquidity is much more restricted than even a few months ago, with the marginal company having all sorts of problems raising capital at low interest rates. The only indicator that isn’t implying a complete end of the cycle is the default rate on high-yield bonds or leveraged loans, which remains below the historical average. However, it is climbing and—according to my forecast and most economists and market observers—likely to rise above the historical average this year for the first time since 2010.

 

Therefore, by just about any metric, the benign cycle seems to be over, so we are entering more of a stressed cycle. We are not yet at point of crisis or distress, though, and it remains to be seen whether we will get there.

And the bubble has plenty of room to burst…

To some extent, this bubble reached a high point in the third quarter of 2015. Starting in the fourth quarter, new issuance dropped and very risky companies, B- and CCC companies with very low Z-scores and very high yield spreads, were no longer able to raise money at almost any rate. As a result, new issues since then have not been as poor in credit quality. But the bubble is still sitting there—even if it isn’t getting bigger—and is pretty inflated, though not necessarily ready to burst unless we have a recession. People say that as long as the economy remains relatively robust, we don’t have to worry about a bubble. I am not quite as confident. But if we do have a recession in the US or a very major downturn in China in the next 12-18 months, there is no question that the bubble will burst, resulting in a mini or not-so-mini credit crisis.

And the corporate bond market is not small…

Recent improvement notwithstanding, IG and HY net leverage ratios remain above the medians of the last three decades… and high yield bond spreads have not traded at these levels outside of a US recession…
 

 

And even with recent strength, levels remain extreme…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1SoIAJG Tyler Durden

The Last Time The Market Was This Overbought, This Happened

The last 3 weeks have been a near unprecedented rip higher in stocks… as markets anticipated G-20 cooperative actions (and then BoJ and ECB follow-through) creating a vicious short-squeeze bounce..

 

This has sent The McClellan Oscillator to its most overbought since January 2009…

 

What happened then?

The Group of 20 leaders from major developed and emerging economies had pledged on their meeting on Saturday short-term measures such as fiscal stimulus in order to try to keep the global economy from falling into a deep slump and promised to look at ways to tighten regulations to prevent future crisis.

Which sent stocks soaring in another major short-squeeze hope bounce

 

That did not end well!


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1LFoARG Tyler Durden

Stocks Tumble After Fed Plans Too-Big-To-Fail Bank Counterparty Risk Cap

US financials are tumbling after The Fed proposed a rule that would limit banks with $500 bln or more of assets from having net credit exposure to a “major counterparty” in excess of 15% of the lender’s tier 1 capital. Bloomberg reports that The Fed's governors plan to vote today on the proposal. The implications of this are significant in that it will force some banks to unwind exposures and delever against one another (most notably with potential affect the repo market which governs much of the liquidity transmission mechanisms). Guggenheim's Jaret Seiberg warns the proposal is likely to be "stringent," though less onerous than the Dec 2011 proposal.

  • *FED ISSUES PROPOSAL ON BANK INTERCONNECTEDNESS IN STATEMENT
  • *FED TO PROPOSE BIG BANKS CAP CREDIT RISK TO EACHOTHER AT 15%
  • *BANKS WITH $500 BLN OF ASSETS WOULD FACE 15% LIMIT UNDER RULE

JPMorgan is tumbling…

 

As Bloomberg reports,

Wall Street giants such as JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. would face new limits on credit exposure to any other large financial company under a Federal Reserve proposal set for a vote Friday.

 

The rules, which would limit such exposures to 15 percent of a lender’s Tier 1 capital, are meant to ensure megabanks won’t take others with them if they fail. The Fed is making a second effort after abandoning a 2011 proposal that called for a cap at 10 percent. Even so, the central bank estimates the largest institutions would have to dial back their exposures by almost $100 billion to get below the 15 percent mark.

 

“The credit limit sets a bright line on total credit exposures between one large bank holding company and another large bank or major counterparty,” Fed Chair Janet Yellen said in a statement. The proposal targets the problem of big-bank connectedness that magnified the 2008 financial crisis, she said.

 

The earlier proposal was shelved after the Fed received strong criticism from the banking industry, and the new version more closely matches an international agreement on a 15 percent cap for the biggest institutions. The strictest limits affect only the U.S. banks deemed systemically important and foreign banks with more than $500 billion in the U.S. Two lower tiers of banks would face lesser limits, with lenders between $50 billion and $250 billion in assets facing the 25 percent cap outlined in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act.

 

 

“While regulatory reform and better risk management practices have reduced interconnections among the largest financial firms by roughly half from pre-crisis days, it is important to put safeguards in place to help prevent a return to those prior practices,” said Daniel Tarullo, the Fed governor in charge of regulation.

 

JPMorgan, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley argued that the earlier proposal overstated risk and would hold back the economy. Goldman Sachs more specifically warned that it could destroy 300,000 jobs. The Bank of Japan said a similar rule affecting foreign firms could hurt liquidity of high-quality sovereign debt.

The Federal proposal on single-counter-party credit limits for SIFI banks, due later, likely to be “stringent,” though may be less onerous than Dec. 2011 proposal, Guggenheim’s Jaret Seiberg writes in note.

The Fed is holding an open board meeting to discuss the proposal:


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1Yc57Kf Tyler Durden

The Only Chart That Matters For The Fed In March

"Uncertainty" exploded in January for The Fed, and after today's "great" (surging job gains) and "terrible" (plunging wages) jobs data (as well as surging current inflation and plunging inflation expectations), we can only imagine Yellen will be even more confused at March's meeting.

 

Source: @Not_Jim_Cramer

Time for a stock market selloff to force The Fed to back off its tightening bias once again…

 

With Dec rate hike odds now above 70%…


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1UFJqCk Tyler Durden

NATO Accuses Russia Of “Weaponizing Refugees” To “Break Europe”

“Do not come to Europe. “Do not believe the smugglers. Do not risk your lives and your money. It is all for nothing.”

That’s from Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, and as you can see, one Eurocrat after the other is now set to go full Viktor Orban in an effort to prove, once and for all that Berlin’s grand effort to construct Angela Merkel’s Multicultural utopia has failed. Miserably.

In some areas, ashes of the bloc’s once beloved Schengen lay littered with the bodies of the cold, the hungry, and in far too many cases, the dead. That’s thanks in part to the bloc’s miserably uncoordinated effort to craft a coherent response to the region’s most horrific refugee crisis World War III. With each country along the route seeking to protect its own interests, values, and most importantly, borders, migrants are pushed and pulled in all directions with no place go.

“Tusk’s comments came as a top U.N. official also warned Thursday that as many as 70,000 people could be “trapped” in Greece in the coming weeks because Macedonia and other European countries are shutting their borders, transforming Greece into a holding pen for migrants desperate to leave, The Washington Post notes.

The Maceonia -Turkey border

Essentially Tusk – and just about everyone else for that matter – is now pointing the finger at Athens and Ankara to decide how to manage a reduction in refugee numbers besieging Europe’s external border (maybe they could build a wall and make Syria pay for it). 

 

Meanwhile, Gen Philip Breedlove, the Supreme Allied Commander Europe and the head of the US European Command, is out accusing the Moscow of attempting to bring the bloc to its knees by “weaponizing migration.” 

“President Putin and Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad had ‘weaponised’ migration through a campaign of bombardment against civilian centers.” he said. Presumably, the civilians then flee into Europe, making the situation that much worse than it already was. 

Of course President Obama can say the exact same for his “highly” successful adventures in the Mid-East.

For those who missed it, here’s the scene at what has become of the the chokepoints:


via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1LYOcnw Tyler Durden