Why A French Triple-Dip Recession Is A Bull's Dream Come True

The possibility of a French recession is not exactly new: even the venerable Economist penned an an extensive article – with a humorous cover – over a year ago describing just such a possibility (the French were unamused). Yet to this date, not only has France managed to avoid the dreaded “Triple Dip” but its bonds continue to be well-bid, with the yield on the 10 Year well inside the US, at only 2.53%, nearly 1% below the wides seen in 2011. However, and especially now that Hollande’s 75% millionaire tax has finally been enacted, the fuse on the baguette time bomb is getting shorter.

As GaveKal’s Francois Chauchat rhetorically asks, “Is every country in Europe recovering, but France? This is the question raised by a third consecutive month of disappointing French manufacturing Purchasing Managers Indices (PMIs), which plunged to 47 in December even as the eurozone-wide PMI expanded to 52.7, a 31-month high. Such a large divergence is peculiar, since France and eurozone PMIs have historically been aligned. It could be that

France’s recovery is just a bit more painful and taking that much longer—but what if the real story is that the country is slipping back into recession?

 

Judged by the PMI surveys alone, and the economy indeed looks to be contracting, a pretty worrying development since the rest of the advanced economies are firmly in growth territory. Another recession would suggest that socialist President Francois Hollande’s targeted high tax agenda has hit a wall, and that a messy revision in economic policy, possibly preceded by financial market pressure, could be in store.

The divergence between France and the rest of Europe can be seen vividly on the European PMI chart below:

So a French recession would be a bad thing, right? Well, yes – for the French population, and certainly whatever is left of its middle class. However, as has been made clear repeatedly, in the New Normal in which only the trickle down effects from the wealth effect of the 1% matters, what the broader population wants and needs is hardly high on the list of priorities of the central planners. What does matter are stocks. And it is the wealthiest 1% and the stock market which, in keeping up with the old bad news is good news maxim, that may be the biggest beneficiary of a French triple dip.

The reason, at least according to GaveKal and increasingly others, is that a French re-re-recession would be precisely the catalyst that forces the ECB out of its inaction slumber and pushes it to engage in what every other “self-respecting” bank has been doing for the past five years – unsterilized quantitative easing: an event which the soaring European stocks have largely been expecting in recent weeks and months.

Quote GaveKal:

But even if the country is slipping back into recession, it is not clear that the “French tail risk” would reignite a broader euro financial crisis — a fear that has been raised repeatedly in the past few years. Would not a shockingly weak French GDP number rather increase pressure on the European Central Bank to act, weaken the euro and push Hollande to deliver more quickly and efficiently on his new pledge to regain business confidence? If this is what a still very hypothetical new French recession produces, not much lasting damage would be done to eurozone financial markets. Rather the opposite.

And there you have it: spinning bad economic news as more hopium for market bulls, and in fact setting the stage when the latest surge in risk assets just happens to coincide with that negative French GDP print, an outcome predicted by BNP two months ago, and an outcome which Draghi and the other ECB doves and which the Hawks on the ECB will theatrically complain about, but in the end, do nothing as usual. And with Merkel incapacitated, well: vive la recession!


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/IFugeERlgYg/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Why A French Triple-Dip Recession Is A Bull’s Dream Come True

The possibility of a French recession is not exactly new: even the venerable Economist penned an an extensive article – with a humorous cover – over a year ago describing just such a possibility (the French were unamused). Yet to this date, not only has France managed to avoid the dreaded “Triple Dip” but its bonds continue to be well-bid, with the yield on the 10 Year well inside the US, at only 2.53%, nearly 1% below the wides seen in 2011. However, and especially now that Hollande’s 75% millionaire tax has finally been enacted, the fuse on the baguette time bomb is getting shorter.

As GaveKal’s Francois Chauchat rhetorically asks, “Is every country in Europe recovering, but France? This is the question raised by a third consecutive month of disappointing French manufacturing Purchasing Managers Indices (PMIs), which plunged to 47 in December even as the eurozone-wide PMI expanded to 52.7, a 31-month high. Such a large divergence is peculiar, since France and eurozone PMIs have historically been aligned. It could be that

France’s recovery is just a bit more painful and taking that much longer—but what if the real story is that the country is slipping back into recession?

 

Judged by the PMI surveys alone, and the economy indeed looks to be contracting, a pretty worrying development since the rest of the advanced economies are firmly in growth territory. Another recession would suggest that socialist President Francois Hollande’s targeted high tax agenda has hit a wall, and that a messy revision in economic policy, possibly preceded by financial market pressure, could be in store.

The divergence between France and the rest of Europe can be seen vividly on the European PMI chart below:

So a French recession would be a bad thing, right? Well, yes – for the French population, and certainly whatever is left of its middle class. However, as has been made clear repeatedly, in the New Normal in which only the trickle down effects from the wealth effect of the 1% matters, what the broader population wants and needs is hardly high on the list of priorities of the central planners. What does matter are stocks. And it is the wealthiest 1% and the stock market which, in keeping up with the old bad news is good news maxim, that may be the biggest beneficiary of a French triple dip.

The reason, at least according to GaveKal and increasingly others, is that a French re-re-recession would be precisely the catalyst that forces the ECB out of its inaction slumber and pushes it to engage in what every other “self-respecting” bank has been doing for the past five years – unsterilized quantitative easing: an event which the soaring European stocks have largely been expecting in recent weeks and months.

Quote GaveKal:

But even if the country is slipping back into recession, it is not clear that the “French tail risk” would reignite a broader euro financial crisis — a fear that has been raised repeatedly in the past few years. Would not a shockingly weak French GDP number rather increase pressure on the European Central Bank to act, weaken the euro and push Hollande to deliver more quickly and efficiently on his new pledge to regain business confidence? If this is what a still very hypothetical new French recession produces, not much lasting damage would be done to eurozone financial markets. Rather the opposite.

And there you have it: spinning bad economic news as more hopium for market bulls, and in fact setting the stage when the latest surge in risk assets just happens to coincide with that negative French GDP print, an outcome predicted by BNP two months ago, and an outcome which Draghi and the other ECB doves and which the Hawks on the ECB will theatrically complain about, but in the end, do nothing as usual. And with Merkel incapacitated, well: vive la recession!


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/IFugeERlgYg/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Want Jobs? Abolish Corporate Income Tax, Says New York Times Op-Ed

Tax cuts and jobsBoston
University economist Laurence Kotlikoff has a
terrific op-ed
today in the New York Times cogently
arguing that abolishing the corporate income tax is the equivalent
of unleashing a jobs creation machine. Kotlikoff accurately notes
that capital goes to where it’s wanted and low taxes are a great
signal that it’s welcome. Kotlikoff and his colleagues have
developed a econometric model to see what effect various corporate
tax rates have on job creation and wages. Kotlikoff reports:

In the model, eliminating the United States’ corporate income
tax produces rapid and dramatic increases in American investment,
output and real wages, making the tax cut self-financing to a
significant extent. Somewhat smaller gains arise from
revenue-neutral corporate tax base broadening, specifically cutting
the corporate tax rate to 9 percent and eliminating all corporate
tax loopholes. Both policies generate welfare gains for all
generations in the United States, but particularly for young and
future workers. Moreover, all Americans can benefit, though by
less, if foreign countries also cut their corporate tax rates.

The size of the potential economic and welfare gains are
stunningly large and don’t reflect any extreme supply-side (a k a,
voodoo economics) assumptions. Fully eliminating the corporate
income tax and replacing any loss in revenues with somewhat higher
personal income tax rates leads to a huge short-run inflow of
capital, raising the United States’ capital stock (machines and
buildings) by 23 percent, output by 8 percent and the real wages of
unskilled and skilled workers by 12 percent. Lowering the corporate
rate tax to 9 percent while also closing loopholes is roughly
revenue neutral and also produces very rapid increases in capital
(by 17 percent), output (by 6 percent) and real wages (by 8
percent).

Before the 2012 election, even
President Obama said
that he wanted to cut corporate income
taxes from 35 percent to 28 percent.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/06/want-jobs-abolish-corporate-income-tax-s
via IFTTT

Read Reason’s Complete January 2014 Issue

Reason January 2014 issueOur entire January
issue is now available online. Don’t miss: Cathy Young on campus
kangaroo courts for (alleged) sex crimes; Wes Kimbell on America’s
internal checkpoints; William D. Eggers on using distributed
technology to tackle society’s most intractable challenges; Greg
Beato on the benfits of unregulated pot; plus our complete Citings
and Briefly Noted sections, the Artifact, and much more.

Click here to
read Reason’s complete January 2014 issue.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/06/read-reasons-complete-january-2014-issue
via IFTTT

Guest Post: Debunking Real Estate Myths – Part 2: Overly Stringent Underwriting

Submitted by Ramsey Su via Acting Man blog,

I remember Ben Bernanke saying that lenders are overly stringent on underwriting, unnecessarily so. I assume Ms. Yellen is parroting the same message, and so are all those in the business, hoping for a return of no-qualification-needed financing.

Are current underwriting practices overly stringent? Yes and no. With the exception of the sub-prime era, underwriting has never been easier (read on before you start calling me names). At the same time, it has never been more difficult for many qualified borrowers to get a loan. This strange phenomenon is among the unintended consequences of ill-guided public policies.

Round peg/round hole, that is the best description current underwriting guidelines. It started with the conservatorship of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Combined with VA and FHA, these agencies have taken over the mortgage finance business with a 90% market share. In the meantime, Bernanke has purchased $788 billion of securities backed by agency loans in 2013.  The Treasury/Fed monopoly has been born. This combination of the Treasury guaranteeing and the Fed buying at manipulated rates made it impossible for any private label mortgage backed securities to compete against the GSEs. The private sector is left with a sliver of the business, mainly in the jumbo and oddball products.

With the dominance of the agencies,  agency guidelines became the law of the land. These guidelines are even more restrictive with the introduction of the CFPB's QM (qualified mortgage) guidelines.

 

Once upon a time there was an occupation known as loan officers. They evaluated a borrower's credit history, ability to pay, collateral and other factors in order to make lending decisions. Today, the title of loan officer may still exist but they are nothing more than children playing with a toy, the one that inserts pegs of different shapes into holes of the same shape. The mortgage version of this toy has only round holes. Round pegs will fit into this hole with ease. Good luck if your pegs are not round. A round peg borrower is a W-2 household, or one with a few years of steady tax returns. A so-so credit score in the low 700s is more than adequate. Even a 580 score is enough to get you an FHA loan. Do you have any idea how irresponsible you have to be in order to have a credit score that low? Speaking of the FHA, borrowers now may become eligible for an FHA loan just one year after a short sale, foreclosure or bankruptcy as long as they can show they experienced financial hardship due to extenuating circumstances, such as unemployment. You have to read this HUD instruction to believe it. FHA also allows co-signers, including blending the family members' income credit to arrive at an acceptable ratio and to cover the down payment as a gift. How much easier can it get?

Do not confuse cumbersome documentation with easy underwriting. Do not confuse easy qualifying with deteriorating qualification of borrowers. Just imagine how many borrowers have been knocked out of the market during 2013 with mortgage rates rising about 1% and double digit house price appreciation.

The mortgage industry is flawed. Underwriting guidelines are flawed. The secondary market is flawed. Policies are heading in the wrong direction. Any system, even sub-prime loans and sub-prime MBS, will work as long as property values appreciate enough to offset the flaws. It is when less than optimal economic conditions occur that the weaknesses surface. I could write a book on this subject but I will only use one simple illustration.

Here are two loan applications, from Joe Sr. and Joe Jr., both plumbers. They have an identical credit score, income, the minimal required down payment and are perfect round pegs at just under the 43% overall debt ratio. The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau has determined that these are Qualified Mortgages. The borrowers are well protected and have the ability to repay.

As it turns out, Joe Sr. is 60 with not many years left that he can bend under the sink. Joe Jr. is only 30 with a full career ahead. Both have no retirement savings (not required). Joe Sr. is going to be living off social security as soon as his back gives out. It is obvious that while these loans are both round pegs, one of them has a high probability of default. In reality, both loans are not likely to survive an economic downturn if the income of both borrowers declines. Both are hand to mouth borrowers with no ability to survive a few missed paychecks. Would you call these underwriting guidelines too stringent?

Anyway, I digressed. My point is underwriting today is not about sound lending practices. It is about how policy makers want to manipulate the market.

A truly healthy mortgage system requires the breakup of the Treasury/Fed monopoly and the return of portfolio lending by community banks. Neither are possible at this time. Therefore, it is useless to analyze the logic behind sound underwriting. It is far more important to anticipate what policy makers are going to do. We know the FHA is already the sub-prime lender of today. We know that with Mel Watt, the probability of more accommodation from Freddie and Fannie is likely. The easiest route is to quietly pass the cost of default insurance to the government, which would only be discovered when we have another down cycle. The Treasury would have to pick up the guarantees but let's not worry about that until we have to. Right?

Mortgage applications have been declining. The mini housing bubble is deflating. Borrower qualifications are not keeping pace with rising rates. What will Ms. Yellen do? Whether it is $40 billion or the tapered $35 billion per month, the Fed is already buying all agency purchase mortgage originations.

In conclusion, I eagerly await some clarification of policies from the new people at the helm of the Treasury/Fed mortgage monopoly, the Watt/Yellen combo. We shall see in the next few weeks.


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/SLOmkYIsVgc/story01.htm Tyler Durden

JPY Surge Sends Japanese Stocks Reeling

The volatility in JPY crosses has been considerable since the start of the new year – likely sending many carry-trade-driven risk manager’s to the trading floors. USDJPY just broke back below 104.00 for the first time since 12/23, dragging the Nikkei 225 to its lowest level since the Taper. Notably, the Nikkei – having almost caught back up to the Dow on Boxing Day – is now at its cheapest in a month. The Nikkei is down 300 points from tofsay’s highs (tripe that of the Dow).

USDJPY at its lowest since 12/23 (i.e. JPY at its strongest)

 

For now, US equities are holding up post the EU close (as carry gets sold)…

 

Which has slammed the Japanese stocks back to their cheapest relative to the Dow in a month…(and eradicated all the post-Taper gains)…

 

Charts: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/fiURpfH4NHU/story01.htm Tyler Durden

North Korea, Gullible Reporters, and a General Theory of Rumors

Not a real person.Last
week yet another strange story from North Korea
shot across the media
: Dictator Kim Jong-Un had allegedly
executed his uncle by feeding him alive to 120 fierce dogs. The
story was quickly debunked—while Kim had undeniably had his uncle
purged and killed, the dogs had been the invention of a
Chinese satirist
. Even before the story’s origins had been
uncovered, skeptics were pointing out
reasons to think
the tale was
probably untrue
.

All of which raises the question: Why did so many outlets run
with such a thinly sourced and dubious story in the first place?
Max Fisher
offers some ideas
:

A friend who’s covered North Korea for several years
and has visited the country, Isaac Stone Fish, now of Foreign
Policy, once joked to me that as an American journalist you can
write almost anything you want about North Korea and people will
just accept it. Call it the Stone Fish Theory of North Korea
coverage. We know so little about what really happens inside the
country, and especially inside the leader’s head, that very little
is disprovable. But the things we do know are often so bizarre that
just about anything can seem possible….

As I wrote in 2012 when the U.S. media were
briefly aflame with nonsensical rumors
that Kim had been
assassinated in Beijing, the images out of the country are so
bizarre and hard information so scant that there’s little to
prevent our imaginations from running wild. We are ready to believe
anything.

Special Pyongyang edition.Add the sort of cultural barriers at work when
Westerners do not recognize the fingerprints of a Chinese satirist
— the flipside of those Chinese journalists who
unwittingly repeat spoofs
 from The Onion — and I
think Fisher has a pretty compelling theory. Indeed, I think you
can extend this past the Korean example to a general thesis about
rumors:

1. The less transparent a society, subculture, institution, or
individual is, the more people will believe weird stories about
it.

2. The more strange things about a society, subculture,
institution, or individual are already known to be true, the more
people will believe still weirder stories about it.

3. If you combine secrecy with strangeness, the weird tales will
multiply.

If you plotted that as a chart, Kim’s kingdom would occupy the
point in the upper right-hand corner, where both secrecy and
strangeness max out. When reading reports about North Korea, you
should adjust your BS detector accordingly.

from Hit & Run http://reason.com/blog/2014/01/06/north-korea-gullible-reporters-and-a-gen
via IFTTT

Revolving Door 2014: Former Head of the Federal Communications Commission Joins Carlyle

What better way to kick off 2014 than with the first (and most certainly not last) egregious example of USA banana republic revolving door crony capitalism. In this case, the crony in question is former head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Julius Genachowski, who was earlier today named Managing Director and partner in the U.S. Buyout team for private equity giant Carlyle Group. Carlyle is so giddy about its latest example of regulatory capture, they issued a glowing press release on the matter. Here are some excerpts:

Tech & Media Business Executive and Former Head of U.S. Federal Communications Commission Will Focus on Global Technology, Media and Telecom Investments

Will Help Carlyle Further Capitalize on Internet and Mobile Revolution

Washington, DC – Global alternative asset manager The Carlyle Group (NASDAQ: CG) today named Julius Genachowski a Managing Director and partner in the U.S. Buyout team. He will focus on investments in global technology, media and telecom, including Internet and mobile. Mr. Genachowski is returning to the private sector after serving as Chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission for four years, departing last May. He is an accomplished leader and expert in technology, media and telecom and brings to Carlyle almost 20 years of experience in the space. Mr. Genachowski joins Carlyle today and will be based in Washington, DC.

Since leaving the FCC, Mr. Genachowski has taught a joint class at Harvard’s Business and Law Schools, and served as a Senior Fellow at the Aspen Institute, the non-partisan education and policy organization. Over the course of his career, he has been a Special Adviser at General Atlantic, a board member and advisor to several public and private companies, and a law clerk to United States Supreme Court Justice David Souter.

Since inception, Carlyle has deployed on a global basis more than $18 billion in equity in investments in the technology, media and telecom sectors. Investments include Syniverse Technologies, Nielsen, Dex Media, AMC Entertainment, Insight Communications, CommScope and SS&C Technologies.

Congrats Mr. Genachowski, this is your big payday. There is no quicker route to success in the USSA than to go into “public service” regulating a massive industry and then flip back over to engage in M&A in the exact industry you were in charge of regulating. Congrats on the several months in which you pretended to be a professor.

In the past couple of years I have highlighted several instances of revolving door cronyism including:

In Journalism.
In Defense.
In Law Enforcement.
In Finance here,herehere and here.

Thanks for playing serfs.

Full press release here.

In Liberty,
Mike

 Follow me on Twitter.

Revolving Door 2014: Former Head of the Federal Communications Commission Joins Carlyle originally appeared on A Lightning War for Liberty on January 6, 2014.

continue reading

from A Lightning War for Liberty http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2014/01/06/revolving-door-2014-former-head-of-the-federal-communications-commission-joins-carlyle/
via IFTTT

Meanwhile, In The Non "Polar Vortex" World…

While America is preparing to usher in the coldest days of the 21st century, some other places around the globe are hardly as worried. Below is a photo from Rio’s Ipanema beach over the weekend, where temperatures hit 51 degrees. Celsius.

Maybe the global warming experts (and their rescuers) currently stuck in the Antarctic ice, should plan accordingly: plus the sights in Rio are certainly more enjoyable than in a barren ice wasteland…

Source: @pdacosta


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/RvyUSDVbEfg/story01.htm Tyler Durden

Meanwhile, In The Non “Polar Vortex” World…

While America is preparing to usher in the coldest days of the 21st century, some other places around the globe are hardly as worried. Below is a photo from Rio’s Ipanema beach over the weekend, where temperatures hit 51 degrees. Celsius.

Maybe the global warming experts (and their rescuers) currently stuck in the Antarctic ice, should plan accordingly: plus the sights in Rio are certainly more enjoyable than in a barren ice wasteland…

Source: @pdacosta


    



via Zero Hedge http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/RvyUSDVbEfg/story01.htm Tyler Durden