With Average House Prices At $6.8 Million In Central London, Is A Property Bubble Set To Burst!

Today’s AM fix was USD 1,348.25 EUR 971.22 and GBP 805.16 per ounce. Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,334.25, EUR 971.57 and GBP 798.00 per ounce.

Gold rose $12.90 or 0.96% to $1,350.30/oz. Silver also rose $0.30 or 1.42% to $21.47/oz.

Gold has continued to edge higher and should achieve a fifth consecutive weekly higher close. This continued rise in gold’s price is bullish from a technical and momentum perspective.

Is London’s Property Bubble Set To Burst?

There are increasing signs that the London residential property market is displaying bubble like qualities.

Authorities such as the Bank of England have denied that a house price “bubble” is developing due to ultra-loose monetary policies.

However, if present trends continue, national house price inflation may rise above 10% within a few months, far higher than the current rate of CPI inflation, which stood at 1.9% in January.

UK Department for Communities and Local Government House Prices London – UK ONS via Bloomberg

Although it’s often argued that London is a unique property market fuelled by a buoyant London economy and continued international interest from overseas buyers, recent price appreciation has taken on a distinct frothy appearance.

This is not to say that London property prices may not keep rising in the short term – momentum is a powerful force. However, investors should tread carefully and evaluate evidence of a bubble.

“This time is different.”

These are the four most expensive words in financial history. Yet, this is the mantra regarding London property prices.

The same thing was said about Dublin property prices in 2006. Dublin? But Dublin is not a financial capital. That is correct, however it is worth remembering that the same things were said about Zurich and Tokyo before the property bubbles in these two financial capitals burst.

Evidence Of A Property Bubble

Official house price reports from organisations such as the Land Registry for England and Wales and the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the Halifax House Price Index and from the Nationwide all show that property prices in most parts of the UK are rising. All these surveys are pointing in the same direction and show that London property prices have risen and are rising at a particularly fast rate.

Halifax House Price Index

According to the widely used Halifax house price index, annual house price inflation is currently running at 7.5% for the UK, but at 15.4% for Greater London, where the average house price has now reached £310,000.

House prices are continuing to accelerate across the UK, according to the latest snapshot from the Halifax mortgage lender.

HBOS UK Property Prices (Bloomberg)

Its latest survey, for February, shows that prices rose by 2.4% last month, leaving them 7.9% higher than a year ago. That was the fastest annual pace of increase since October 2007 and means the average UK home now costs £179,872.

However, record levels of debt and continuing pressures on household finances, as earnings fail to keep pace with consumer price inflation, are expected to remain a constraint on the rate of growth of house prices in the UK.

Sales have been picking up strongly too in the past year. In January, house sales in the UK had risen for the ninth month in a row. The number of mortgages approved for home buyers, but not yet lent, was 42% higher than a year ago, suggesting a further rise in sales is still to come.

At the top end, or prime, segment of the London market, which generally means the top 5-10% of properties, the average price of a property is now £4 million in central London, £1.8 million in Greater London and £1 million in the surrounding Home Counties. While overseas buyers investing in central London have long been credited to have pushed out the majority of other buyers, their impact is now starting to boost prices in the prime segments of Greater London and surrounding areas, as rich domestic buyers are also forced to buy further afield.

That overseas rich cash buyers are primarily responsible for driving up central London prime residential prices is not just hearsay. It is well documented. London’s Evening Standard recently highlighted at least 740 ‘ghost mansions’ worth £3 billion in total that are currently sitting empty and unused around central west London and a number of other enclaves. Even the current uncertainty in the Ukraine is adding to the mix, with London’s prime estate agents having noticed an increase in enquiries from rich Ukrainian and Russian clients over the last few weeks.

Knight Frank

According to Knight Frank, the reputable London estate agent, house prices in the prime central London segment rose for the 40th consecutive month in February, the longest consecutive rise since the firm began producing its London prime index in 2004. They note that 12 month price appreciation to February 2014 was 12.8% in the sub-£2 million category and 3.4% in the £10 million plus bracket. Knight Frank notes that the rate of increase at the very top end £10 million plus has slowed compared to the previous year, when it reached 6.1%, and the year prior to that, when it touched 10.7%. With central London so expensive, the ripple effect is going ever outwards.

Savills

Savills, a similar firm to Knight Frank, forecasts that London prices over the next five years to 2018 will still rise strongly with the larger gains outside the very centre. Savills predicts a 23.1% gain in central London over the five years to 2018, a 22% gain in ‘other London’, and a 25% gain in inner commuting belts. However there is evidence that these forward looking rosy forecasts by industry agents need to be tempered with the consideration of additional evidence.

Shiller

U.S. economist Robert Shiller recently warned that London property prices could be in a bubble. Shiller, the Yale based economist who shared last year’s Nobel Prize in economics, is notably for his work on demonstrating that asset prices can become irrational and out of step with economic fundamentals. He is co-creator of the widely followed Case-Shiller Home Price Indices in the US. Last October, Shiller commented that the rapid price rises in London property looks like a bubble that is being fuelled by easy credit availability.

RICS

In its latest monthly survey of the UK residential market, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) confirms an overheating London market, finding that price rises are by far the strongest in London and the South East relative to the rest of the country. Every month RICs collates market feedback from its’ members into a blended net balance indicator of sentiment using factors such as house prices, new buyer enquiries, agreed sales, and new vendor instructions.

The overall net balance figure for the UK is now at +50 and has been so for five consecutive months. The last time this occurred was in mid-2002. Most strikingly though, the net balance figure is now +87 for London and +80 for the South East region. As a comparison, the same figure is +21 in Wales and +12 for the North of England.

Feedback from RICs members in London is nearly unanimous in highlighting “a lack of supply pushing prices higher”, “a dire shortage of new sales”, “most properties going under offer as soon as they hit the market”, and “international buyers still showing a good interest, particularly in new builds”. Commenting on the February report, RICs director Peter Bolton-King said that London prices may become unstable.

EY

Adding to the evidence of a London bubble, EY Item Club, the independent economic forecast group sponsored by Ernst Young, released its own report last month, aptly titled “UK housing: no bubble to burst…except in London”. The EY report warns that housing bubble conditions are emerging in Greater London with the acceleration of prices now extending beyond the prime properties of central London and out to the broader London residential market.

EY notes that policy makers and regulators could attempt to cool demand by enforcing London specific lending limits on borrowers based on mortgage to income multiples, but the authors concede that without any real changes in government policy or market dynamics, London’s unique factors of a) super-rich cash buyers in the prime market and b) well paid London professionals in much of the rest of the market, appear to indicate that price appreciation is not going to cool off anytime soon.

Civitas

Independent social policy think-tank Civitas also released a property study last month and called for the imposition of controls on wealthy overseas buyers in the London property market. The authors refer to the “rampant house price inflation” in London, where the “global super-rich” are using London property as an investment vehicle and a safe haven shield from more volatile countries, while younger and less well-off London residents are being squeezed out of the market.

The report highlights that while the ratio of average income to average property prices across the UK has risen from 2.3 in 1980 to 4.6 in 2013, the same ratio for London hit 6.1 in 2013. As a supply boosting measure, Civitas calls for regulations that would only allow overseas investment buyers to acquire existing properties in London if they proved this would add to the available housing stock. Similar rules already exist in economies such as Australia, Switzerland and Singapore.

OECD

The most recent OECD semi-annual economic outlook warned that UK house prices might be experiencing a potential bubble since economic policy and supply constraints are causing an overheating market.

Government Policy

UK residential market prices are currently being supported by various favourable economic factors and government led schemes. The government’s ‘help to buy scheme’, supposedly structured for those who otherwise could not afford a property, offers an interest free loan of 20% of the purchase price of a house up to £600,000, with a 15% lender loan guarantee by the government. This scheme is helping to drive mortgage applications and has been criticised by the IMF and others for potentially stoking a property bubble, and for having specified an upper house price that, while realistic for London, is very generous for other parts of the country.

Historically low official Bank of England rates are feeding into relatively favourable mortgage rates. The official stance of the UK Treasury and Bank of England is not expected to change anytime soon since they require low interest rates to support an economic recovery. However external economic shocks are not unknown and can come when least expected.

Affordability of property in relation to earnings is an issue and is becoming a bigger issue as prices continue to rise, not just in London, but across the UK. There are also signs that various parts of the market are becoming choked as those who would otherwise move up can’t and so this impacts younger potential buyers who can’t get on the property ladder.

Asset bubbles don’t always announce themselves and can sometimes be violent when they begin. This then can create liquidity issues on the sell side as many participants rush to sell simultaneously.

Interest Rates

Interest rates are at historic lows. Given the precarious financial position of the UK it is highly likely that interest rates will only go higher in medium and long term. The ramifications for property markets and especially the residential sector should not be ignored.

Conclusion

London is a truly global city, as such its fortunes rise and fall on the tide of the global international marketplace.

Evidence clearly suggests the London property market is attracting safe haven funds from global investors seeking reprieve from a post financial-crisis world where the competitive devaluation of currencies, prolonged low interest rates, unorthodox monetary policy such as QE have all combined to make London an attractive haven for investment monies.

As monetary officials the world over wrestle with deep systemic imbalances, geopolitical uncertainties and the looming threat of bail-ins, investors will continue to seek shelter in assets that operate as a safe haven such as property but also more conventional safe haven assets such as gold.

We believe that ultimately these elevated asset price levels in London property are unsustainable and will be subject to violent correction. Given that interest rates are at historical lows, the London property prices will become increasingly sensitive to any upward movement in interest rates.

This Market Update is reprinted in full in Issue 7 of GoldCore’s Insight Series. Download your copy here: Is London’s Property Bubble Set To Burst?


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jZx5p9 GoldCore

Stocks Jump And Bonds Dump As Unemployment Rate Rises

The knee-jerk reaction to a better-than-expected (and entirely noise-driven) payroll number (with a rise in the unemployment rate) is a rip higher in stocks and collapse in bonds and precious metals. The USD is surging as USDJPY instantly hit 103.50 (breaking through its 50DMA) providing all the juice stocks need to test that critical Goldman 1,900 year-end target for the S&P 500. It seems, just as we warned earlier, "whatever the number, the algos will send stocks higher – that much is given in a blow off top bubble market in which any news is an excuse to buy more."

 

 

Of course there's only one real reason why stocks surged…

 

 

Charts: Bloomberg


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jZx58v Tyler Durden

February Payrolls 175K, Beat Expectations Of 149K, Unemployment Rate Rises To 6.7%

So much for the weather. As we warned earlier today, when we said that with everyone expecting a miserable print the only possible result would be a large “beat”, sure enough that’s precisely what happened. Breaking it down:

  • February payrolls: +175K, Exp. 149K, Last revised from 113K to 129K).
  • Household survey jobs added: 42K, far less than the Household survey.
  • Unemployment rate: 6.7%, Exp. 6.6%, Last 6.6%.
  • Labor participation rate: 63.0%, Last 63.0%
  • Private payrolls: 162K, Exp. 145K, Last 145K
  • Manufacturing payrolls: 6K, Exp. 5K, Previous revised from 21K to 6K

Visually:

 

From the report:

Both the number of unemployed persons (10.5 million) and the unemployment rate (6.7 percent) changed little in February. The jobless rate has shown  little movement since December. Over the year, the number of unemployed persons and the unemployment rate were down by 1.6 million and 1.0 percentage point, respectively. (See table A-1.)

Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult men (6.4 percent), adult women (5.9 percent), teenagers (21.4 percent), whites (5.8 percent), blacks (12.0 percent), and Hispanics (8.1 percent) showed little or no change in February. The jobless rate for Asians was 6.0 percent (not seasonally adjusted), about unchanged over the year. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.)

The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) increased by 203,000 in February to 3.8 million; these individuals accounted for 37.0 percent of the unemployed. The number of long-term unemployed was down by 901,000 over the year. (See table A-12.)

Both the civilian labor force participation rate (63.0 percent) and the employment-population ratio (58.8 percent) were unchanged in February. The labor force participation rate was down 0.5 percentage point from a year ago, while the employment-population ratio was little changed over the year. (See table A-1.)

The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) was little changed at 7.2 million in February. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find full-time work. (See table A-8.)

In February, 2.3 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force, a decline of 285,000 over the year. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. (See table A-16.)

Among the marginally attached, there were 755,000 discouraged workers in February, down by 130,000 from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.5 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in February had not searched for work for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities. (See table A-16.)


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1fP1XTX Tyler Durden

Previewing Today’s 1.5 Million Payrolls Seasonal Adjustment

Today’s consensus estimate for the non-farm payroll is for a 149K increase broken down as follows among some select banks:

  • Bank of America 115K
  • Deutsche Bank 120K
  • Goldman Sachs 125K
  • Citigroup 135K
  • JP Morgan 140K
  • Barclays 150K
  • UBS 165K
  • HSBC 167K

Why is the expectation so low? Why cold weather of course – the same cold weather that supposedly impacted December and January data. Then again, one wonders just what is the seasonal adjustment factor for if not to adjust for the, gasp, seasons.

So when one puts the February actual number in the context of its average adjustment over the past decade, what does one get? Simple – a boost of 1.5 million “jobs” which exsit nowhere in the real world but in some Arima-X-13 spreadsheet.

The chart below shows what the average seasonal factor by month has been in the past 10 years.

In other words, today’s entire pick up in jobs is one tenth of the overall seasonal adjustment factor, which as we know by now is woefully broken since it is so incapable of grasping the simple concept of cold and snow in the winter.

And now you know why today’s number is once again meaningless and only there to stimulate HFT algos into buying whether the news is good or bad.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1cB2GOm Tyler Durden

Some Cities with High Income Inequality Also See High Income Mobility

The Brookings Institute is out
with a new
report
identifying America’s most unequal cities.
Interestingly, many of these happen to be the same cities Harvard
economists
identified
as having the highest income mobility.
Surprised?

For instance, among Brooking’s
top ten unequal cities
, half of them were also on Harvard’s
list of top 10 cities for highest income
mobility
: San Francisco, Washington DC, New York, Los Angeles,
and Boston. [1]

This raises the question for whether income inequality signals
something completely and unequivocally nefarious is afoot. Without
question there are unfair and unjust practices artificially
inflating income inequality that we must address (crony capitalism,
racism, excessive regulation, among others). However, these data
also prompt us to consider if the drivers of income mobility may
also contribute to income inequality.

Perhaps more incredible is that despite rising income inequality
in the United States, income mobility has remained constant since
the post-war era (read more
here
and here).
What this means is that despite the rungs on the economic ladder
moving further apart, people are still grasping the next (even
higher) rung at the same rate as before. This means higher lifetime
incomes; this means a higher standard of living.

Credit: Keppler, Joseph Ferdinand, artist.'"Mark Twain," America's best humorist.' Keppler & Schwarzmann, 1885. Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress. What might surprise some is
that during the 19th century’s so-called Gilded Age, the
era of robber barons, economic mobility was even higher than it is
today. Economist Joseph Ferrie has
found
that in the 19th century “the United States
was in fact more mobile both socially and physically than other
places, and this remarkable fluidly persisted at least through the
1920s.” While correlation is not causation, it is remarkable that
income mobility declined after the New Deal was
implemented and during the post-war boom. Some point to the
1950s-1960s as exemplary because the bottom quintile’s income

grew
at 2.5% a year; however, if Ferrie’s analysis is correct
then the rate of economic mobility for individuals declined also
during this time period. In other words, as a group the lower
income quintile’s income grew, but the individual people in that
group were less likely to break out of that group.

These data suggest that economic mobility is often a more
important consideration than income inequality. As it turns out
Paul Krugman partly
agrees
, and has said “there are some risks in drawing too many
conclusions about the distribution of economic welfare from … the
distribution of income.” Moreover, he’s pointed out that economic
mobility can make the distribution of lifetime income more
equal if it’s high enough.

There are two ways one can look at income mobility. First is
relative income mobility—how did an individual move
relative to others along the income ladder. For instance, using
that measure, the Treasury
found
that about 50-60% of Americans in the bottom quintile in
1995 had moved to a higher quintile by 2005. However, this measure
assumes that if the tide lifts all boats an individual’s “rank”
along the income ladder stays the same.

Perhaps more illuminating is absolute income mobility,
which measures how much each individual’s wealth changed in real
absolute dollars, regardless of everyone else. The Treasury

found
that households in the bottom quintile in 1995
experienced on average a 91% increase in real income. Breaking
these numbers down: half experienced a doubling of their actual
real incomes, another 15% experienced a 50-100% increase, and
another 17% had up to a 50% increase, while 18 percent had their
incomes go down. (I’ve pasted the charts below)

The persistent and often myopic focus on income inequality
instead of income mobility has, perhaps unintentionally, misled
people into believing that regular Americans’ wealth has not
improved since the “good years” of the 1950s-1970s. But for most
Americans, this simply isn’t true.

Relative Income Mobility

Absolute Income Mobility

[1] To be clear, not all highly mobile cities also had high
income inequality and visa versa. For instance, Salt Lake City,
Seattle, and San Diego were also in the top eight for income
mobility but were not ranked as high on income inequality.
Similarly, Atlanta and Chicago were also in the top most unequal
cities and had some of the
lowest rates
of income mobility as well.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1nn5Cz5
via IFTTT

A.M. Links: Issa Apologizes to Cummings, Obama Calls Putin, NSA Apparently Cares About Civil Liberties

  • Chairman of the House Oversight Committee Rep. Darrell
    Issa (R-Calif)
    has apologized
    to Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) for his behavior
    at a recent hearing on alleged IRS abuses. Issa cut off Cummings’
    mic while the Maryland lawmaker tried to make a statement.
  • President Obama has urged Russian President Vladimir Putin to
    seek a
    diplomatic solution
    to the Crimea crisis.
  • The Massachusetts Legislature passed a bill banning
    “upskirting”
    shortly after the state’s Supreme Judicial Court
    ruled that an anti-criminal voyeurism law does not apply to
    snapping photos up women’s skirts.
  • Secretary of Defense
    Chuck Hagel
    has said that legally required cuts to the defense
    budget pose “tough, tough choices.”
  • The NSA’s privacy and civil liberties officer said that civil
    liberties are a top concern for the intelligence agency. No,

    she really did
    .
  • Turkey’s prime minister has threatened to
    ban Facebook and Youtube
    in order to stop political opponents
    from posting audio recordings that expose corruption in his inner
    circle.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on
Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You
can also get the top stories mailed to you–sign up
here

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1fP1VeN
via IFTTT

Kurt Loder Reviews The Grand Budapest Hotel and 300: Rise of an Empire

Wes Anderson’s eighth feature is a clockwork
wedding cake, an eccentric caper movie sprinkled with pixie dust, a
picture that sends you scrambling for clever metaphors and failing
to find them. It’s a movie of enormous charm, thanks to its many
fine actors, and it has a serene formal beauty (cinematographer
Robert D. Yeoman, production designer Adam Stockhausen and composer
Alexandre Desplat are all veteran Anderson collaborators). If it
were a wedding cake, writes Kurt Loder, it might be found
to consist mostly of icing. But the icing is very tasty.

By contrast, after an hour or so of walloping carnage in
300: Rise of an Empire, you may feel as if you were being
hammered into submission. Some viewers may take that as a
recommendation.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1fP1UYx
via IFTTT

TRIPLE UPDATED! Double Updated! Updated! Bitcoin’s Creator Revealed! Actually is a Guy Named Satoshi Nakamoto! And Yes, a Libertarian (Naturally)!


UPDATED, Friday, March 7, 8:20 AM
ET:
 Indications that the Satoshi Nakamoto identified
yesterday by Newsweek as the creator of Bitcoin is not the
real Nakamoto continue to build. Among the most
interesting bits? The profile page at P2P
Foundation
on which Nakamoto announced Bitcoin has been updated
saying simply, “I am not Dorian Nakamoto” (the legal name used by
Newsweek‘s catch). The AP reports out the California-based
Nakamoto’s
denial here as well
.


Here’s a piece
on Buzzfeed that discusses the practice of
“doxxing,” or tracking people down via online trails and publicly
accessible documents, which is how Newsweek‘s Leah McGrath
Goodman found who she continues to insist is the right man.
Newsweek has been heavily criticized for publishing
pictures of Nakamoto’s home and address, license plate, and
more.

Something to think about as the story proceeds: While uncovering
the identity of who created Bitcoin (whether it’s a single person
or a group) is undeniably interesting and juicy, it has not effect
on the currency’s utility or continued functioning. Indeed, the
reports over Nakamoto’s identity have in many ways blotted out the
apocalyptic warnings that Bitcoin was done after the implosion of
the Mt. Gox exchange last week and the
apparent suicide
just days ago of a 28-year-old American,
Autumn Radtke, who ran a Singapore-based exchange.

Related: Last week, I explained why I didn’t
think Bitcoin was finished in the wake of Mt. Gox.
Read that piece here.

Even More Updated, 5:30 PM ET: Hit
“More” or scroll down for latest, including Instagram video in
which Nakamoto denies involvement in Bitcoin.

Updated, 11:32 AM ET: Over at Reddit’s
Bitcoin sub, there’s a lively thread suggesting that Newsweek has
got the wrong Nakamoto. Among the evidence? Past suggestions that
the real Nakamoto’s age is much younger than the one pictured above
and that his written English (based on various online postings and
letters to the editor) isn’t particularly good.
Read the whole thing
. Hat Tip: Naomi Brockwell, Reason TV
contributor and proprietor of Bitcoin Girl.

The man pictured above is, says
Newsweek
, the creator of bitcoin, Satoshi
Nakamoto:

Far from leading to a Tokyo-based whiz kid using the name
“Satoshi Nakamoto” as a cipher or pseudonym (a story repeated by
everyone from Bitcoin’s rabid fans to The New
Yorker
), the trail followed by Newsweek led
to a 64-year-old Japanese-American man whose name really is Satoshi
Nakamoto. He is someone with a penchant for collecting model trains
and a career shrouded in secrecy, having done classified work for
major corporations and the U.S. military.

Nakamoto was hiding in the same way the author Thomas Pynchon
was “hiding” – in plain sight. He used a slightly different name in
his work life, but Nakamoto wasn’t in deep cover. Kudos to
Newsweek‘s Leah McGrath Goodwin for doing the work to find
him. He lives in Temple City, California and came to the U.S. as a
child:

Descended from Samurai and the son of a Buddhist priest,
Nakamoto was born in July 1949 in the city of Beppu, Japan, where
he was brought up poor in the Buddhist tradition by his mother,
Akiko. In 1959, after a divorce and remarriage, she immigrated to
California, taking her three sons with her. Now age 93, she lives
with Nakamoto in Temple City.

Like all great Americans, he lived for a while in New Jersey,
where he worked for RCA in Camden. He also worked for the FAA,
Hughes Aircraft, and a bunch of other firms. He also did defense
contract work.

And yes,  he is a libertarian whose own family didn’t
suspect him of being the inventor of the world’s leading
alt-currency.

A libertarian, Nakamoto encouraged his daughter to be
independent, start her own business and “not be under the
government’s thumb,” she says. “He was very wary of the government,
taxes and people in charge.”…

Calling the possibility her father could also be the father of
Bitcoin “flabbergasting,” Ilene Mitchell says she isn’t surprised
her father would choose to stay under cover if he was the man
behind this venture, especially as he is currently concerned about
his health.

“He is very wary of government interference in general,” she
says. “When I was little, there was a game we used to play. He
would say, ‘Pretend the government agencies are coming after you.’
And I would hide in the closet.”

Whole
thing here.

Updated 5:30 PM ET: Via the Twitter feed of Declan McCullagh
comes this image comparing a letter written by Dorian Nakamoto (the
legal name of the man named above as the creator of Bitcoin) and an
announcement of Bitcoin’s founding theoretical document, as
compiled by crytography@metzdowd.com mailing
list
. Right-click on image below and choose “open image in new
tab” to read full text or go here.


Nakamoto,
reports The Los Angeles Times
, says, “I’m not involved
in Bitcoin.”

Here’s an Instagram of him saying that:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1iiWdd4
via IFTTT

Russia Threatens Retaliation To Sanctions, Announces Support For Crimean Referendum

It appears Obama’s latest “one hour” conversation with Putin has just made things downshift from bad to worse.

Moments ago Russia accused the European Union of taking an “extremely unconstructive position” by freezing talks on easing visa barriers that complicate travel between Russia and the EU over Ukraine.

Russia will not accept the language of sanctions and threats” and will retaliate if sanctions are imposed, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement about agreements reached at an emergency EU summit on Thursday.

And assuring that the imminent Crimean referendum due in just over a week will rapidly deteriorate the current detente was overnight news that Russia’s upper house of parliament will support Crimea in its bid to join the Russian Federation, the speaker of the upper house of parliament said Friday. “If the people of Crimea decide to join Russia in the referendum, we, as the upper house, will certainly support this decision,” Valentina Matvienko said at a meeting with Vladimir Konstantinov, his counterpart in the Crimean parliament.

WSJ reports that a delegation from the Crimean peninsula were in Moscow to meet parliamentarians who warmly welcomed the guests and signaled their willingness to support the neighboring region.

Shortly thereafter, the western inspectors learned they are not exactly welcome in the Crimea later on Friday when a group of military and civilian personnel from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe will be making another attempt to enter the Crimean peninsula, after being stopped at two border checkpoints the day before, a spokesman for the organization said.

“The group is on their way from Kherson, where they spent the night, and is heading to a checkpoint in the area of a village called Chungar,” Shiv Sharma said, adding that the group of about 40 people is scheduled to arrive around 1330 local time (1130 GMT).

But while the OSCE inspectors will hardly receive a warm welcome anywhere in the pro-Russian parts of the Ukraine, one thing is certain: while for the next week the world is stuck listening to more hollow rhetoric, once the Crimea formally splits from the Ukraine and joins Russia as per the will of the parliament and the people, that’s when things get rough, as that will be the formal expansion of Russia into a region of the Ukraine which everyone in the west has called an unconstitutional process, while Russia itself calls the coup that overthrew Yanukovich just as unconstitutional.

So enjoy the downtime: in mid-March things get hot again. Or, if you live in the Ukraine, quite cold:

  • GAZPROM SAYS TODAY IS DEADLINE FOR NAFTOGAZ TO PAY FOR FEB. GAS
  • NAFTOGAZ OVERDUE PAYMENTS AT $1.89B FOR GAS SUPPLIES

Leverage.


    



via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jZj1vX Tyler Durden

As Drug War Dissent Mounts, U.N. Agency Rails Against Reforms It Cannot Stop

I’ve got a new column at
Forbes that details the Internation Narcotics Control
Board’s futile resistance against drug policy reform. Here is how
it starts:

Although marijuana remains illegal in the Netherlands, in 1976
the Dutch government began tolerating retail sales of
small amounts by so-called coffee shops. Thirty-eight years later,
the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), a U.N. agency
that describes its mission as “monitoring and supporting
Governments’ compliance with the international drug control
treaties,” is still complaining about that policy. In its
latest annual report, issued this week, the INCB notes that
the Dutch “tolerance policy” (gedoogbeleid) “allows small
amounts of cannabis to be sold and abused.” (INCB officials, like
hardline drug warriors everywhere, define all recreational
consumption of marijuana as abuse.) According to the INCB, such
tolerance is intolerable: “The Board reiterates its position that
such ‘coffee shops’ are in contravention of the provisions of the
international drug control conventions.”

If the INCB does not like Amsterdam’s cannabis cafés, which are
technically illegal, you can imagine how it feels about Denver’s
state-licensed pot shops. Actually, you don’t have to imagine. INCB
President Raymond Yans, never one to hold back criticism of
governments he deems insufficiently zealous in suppressing the
consumption of arbitrarily proscribed intoxicants, spells it out in
black and white. “We deeply regret the developments at the state
level in Colorado and Washington, in the United States, regarding
the legalization of the recreational use of cannabis,”
he writes. “INCB reiterates that these developments contravene
the provisions of the drug control conventions, which limit the use
of cannabis to medical and scientific use only.”


Read the whole thing
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1f68xKv
via IFTTT