Sheriff in Burned Baby Raid Wants Your Prayers; Target of Warrant Could Be Charged For Injuries to Toddler

prayers!

CNN has
updates
on the story of the Georgia SWAT team that
threw a flash bang
while executing a no-knock warrant that
severely burned a nineteen-month-old baby. Habersham County Sheriff
Joey Terrell says the deputies involved are “devastated” and that
they’ve been called “baby killers” and received threats. “All I can
say is pray for the baby, his family and for us,” the sheriff told
CNN.

Terrell has insisted his officers and those of the local police
department did nothing wrong and
blamed the target of the warrant
(not found at the house that
was invaded) on the attack on the toddler. A chief assistant
district attorney for the county, J. Edward Staples, says the
target of the warrant could in fact be charged for the injuries the
sheriff’s deputies caused the toddler. In an obvious attempt to
immunize himself and his office from liability, the sheriff has
claimed the situation was unavoidable even as he attempted to offer
reassurances that his SWAT team would be more diligent in the
future. He told CNN that his officers “obviously would have done
things different” (IF they knew there was a child in the home),
like go in through a side door or not use a flash bang. Until using
violence to crack down on non-violent “crimes” becomes politically
untenable for “public servants,” it won’t matter how much
ass-covering law enforcement does after the fact, these kinds of
incidents will continue to happen.

The toddler’s family, who was staying with a relative at the
home that was attacked after their own home in Wisconsin was burned
down, says they don’t have insurance and have set up a website for donations.

A circuit district attorney is conducting a “review” of the
incident, which should be done next week according to the chief
assistant district attorney. Terrell had previously said neither
the district attorney’s office nor the Georgia Bureau of
Investigation was investigating the incident.

Habersham County Chief Assistant District Attorney J. Edward
Staples said Thonetheva could also be charged in connection with
the baby’s injuries.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1mSSySm
via IFTTT

U.S. Sentencing Commission Pinpoints Billions in Savings in Retroactive Mercy to Those in Prison for Mandatory Minimum Drug Crimes

Via Families Against Mandatory
Minimums
 (FAMM), an interesting
memo from the U.S. Sentencing Commission
, trying to calculate
how much the government would save if it let people out of
prison for having spent the amount of time there that newer and
more sensible federal sentencing guidelines would normally impose
for drug crimes.

Key excerpts:

If the courts were to grant the full reduction possible in
each case [of applying newer standard sentences retroactively], the
projected new average sentence for these offenders would be
102 months, a reduction of 23 months (or 18.4%). Based on this
reduction, the estimated total savings to the Federal Bureau
of Prisons (BOP) from the retroactive application of the 2014
drug guidelines amendment would be 83,525 bed years….

While the memo itself didn’t translate that figure into cold
hard cash money, the folks at Vox
in writing about this memo
concluded:

A “bed year” is the cost of incarcerating one prisoner for one
year — which came out to a little
under $29,000
 during fiscal year 2011.

So that’s a total savings of about $2.4 billion (albeit spread
out over many years).

75 percent of those eligible for such sentence reduction are
black or hispanic, by the way.

Jacob Sullum from earlier this month on “Why
America Leads the World at Putting People in Cages
.”

Some disclosure: FAMM’s founder Julie Stewart used to be my boss
23 years ago, and former Reason champ Mike Riggs now works
for them.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1wCkf72
via IFTTT

Even The Fed Admits The “Natural” Rate Of Interest Is Lower Than Markets Are Pricing

One of the most important, but difficult to measure, concepts in macroeconomics is the natural or equilibrium real interest rate. This is the rate of interest consistent with full employment and stable inflation. The last few weeks have seen bond yields tumble and a rising cacophony of market participants questioning both the Fed's central tendency of terminal or natural rates (around 4%) and the market's perception of how fast we get there. SF Fed Williams models see a 1.8% natural rate, BofA also believes it is between 1.5 and 2%; and now Citi admits, "fair value of long-term rates may be lower than we and other market participants judged them to be."

As BofA explains,

The natural rate is unobservable and varies considerably over time. In particular, it tends to be low during recessions and high during recoveries. However, over the long term, it tends to gravitate toward a slowly evolving normal level. Thus, it is useful to think of both a shortterm natural rate—the level needed to counter short term shocks — and the longterm natural rate—the level once the economy settles down. Pin-pointing the natural rate is important because it helps us gauge how stimulative current monetary policy is, and it helps forecast how far the Fed will eventually hike rates.

Recently, a number of analysts have suggested that the natural rate is much lower today. They point to the low average rates of the last decade. They note that the current period may be similar to the pre-Volcker years of low real rates. They also argue that the drop in trend growth in the economy may mean a lower natural rate. According to our rates team, this talk of a lower natural rate has helped push long-run market expectations for the nominal funds rate down to just 3%. Assuming the Fed hits its 2% inflation target, this implies just a 1% real rate. Here, we take a close look at the natural real rate in both theory and practice and argue that the market has probably overshot a bit. Our tentative bottom-line: the real natural rate has dropped from an historic average of about 2% to 1 ½%.

A common view among analysts is that “according to growth theory, in the longrun, the real rate of interest should equal trend growth in GDP.”

….

So much for the theory, what about practice? The simplest way to measure the natural rate is to average interest rates over long periods of time, smoothing out short-term swings related to recessions and other shocks. While we can get data on short-term interest rates going back into the 1800s, we focus our analysis on the period since 1960. Capital markets are very different today than in the pre-war period, and the earlier periods featured some huge swings in real short-term interest rates (Chart 7). Real rates surged in the Depression when inflation went deeply negative and then collapsed during and after World War II when inflation spiked but interest rates were fixed by the US Treasury. These extended outlier periods tell us little about the natural rate.

Chart 8 shows “ex post” real rates over the last 55 years.


 
Finally, there is also an active academic literature on the natural rate. In the most commonly cited paper, Laubach and Williams (L&W) have estimated the natural funds rate in a simple macro model. The model includes three equations and two “gap variables”: (1) GDP growth depends on its own lags and the deviation of the real funds rate from its natural level; (2) inflation is determined by the gap between actual and potential GDP (i.e. the output gap); and (3) potential GDP growth and the natural real funds rate both depend on growth in productivity.

In the original paper-back in 2003, L&W found that the natural rate varied from a high of about 4.5% in the mid-1960’s to a low of 1.25% in the early 1990s, but had rebounded to about 3% at the time of the writing. They also found the natural rate did vary roughly one-for-one with potential growth, but that most of the variation in the natural rate came from other factors in their model.

More recently, L&W have updated their estimates, and the results are eyepopping: the natural rate has tumbled to -0.2% in 4Q of last year (Chart 9). If true, this has big implications for the economy and bond markets.

Before investors pour all of their money into the bond market, however, it is important to take these results with a grain of salt. As the authors admit, the uncertainty around their estimates is “sizable”.

FOMC members are in the process of revising their own views of the natural rate. Four times a year, each member submits funds rate forecasts for the next few years and for the “longer run”. Presumably the “longer run” corresponds to their estimate of the nominal natural rate—the sum of the real natural rate and the Fed’s 2% inflation target. This “dot plot” has been drifting lower since it was introduced in January 2012 (Chart 10).
 

The debate at the Fed has shifted lower with “hawks” abandoning the 4.5% projection and “doves” moving down to 3.5%. Recall that one of those dots is San Francisco Fed President John Williams—he’s the “W” in “L&W”. His model suggests a 1.8% nominal natural rate. And yet the lowest “dot” is 3.5%, and he has not offered an estimate in his public speeches.

BofA's ominous conclusion…

Unless the US is going down the “Japan path” of chronic malaise, higher rates are just a matter of time.

That could never happen here.. right? Of course none of this should a surprise after Ben Bernanke himself said interest rates would not normalize to those historicl levels in his lifetime…




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1gLsFo5 Tyler Durden

Yes, Government Law Enforcement Keeps Screwing the Poor

Jesse Walker wisely wrote here the other day that “A
Serious Anti-Poverty Agenda Has to Include Criminal Justice
Reform
.” I reported in January on various instances in which
the enforcement of petty laws involving the way we move ourselves
and our vehicles through the world—and where we deposit them—can
ruin the less-well-offs lives for very little good reason in my
article “Petty
Law Enforcement vs. the Poor
.”

One thing I learned in my research for that article from
academics and workers in the field of poverty aid was that there
was very little accumulated sociological knowledge about the true
extent of this problem. Last week, the sometimes-good folk at NPR
did an
interestingly thorough journalistic look
at one aspect of this
whole issue: court costs.

While not revealing all the facts with social science precision,
helps remind anyone who cares that if the government wants to make
the lives of the poor less harsh, it can profitably check itself
and do some things differently.

It relates sad anecdotes about how very minor infractions can
lead to jail time if you don’t pay the fines you were first hit
with. And it stressed how in most states the government—despite all
those taxes we pay—basically wants each offender to cover the costs
of their own prosecution, including public defenders,
incarcaration, parole supervison, even sometimes jury trials.

The nub of the problem:

The people most likely to face arrest and go through the courts
are poor, says sociologist Alexes Harris, at the University of
Washington. She’s writing a book on these fees and the people who
struggle to pay them.

“They tend to be people of color, African-Americans and
Latinos,” Harris says. “They tend to be high school dropouts, they
tend to be people with mental illness, with substance abuse. So
these are already very poor and marginalized people in our society,
and then we impose these fiscal penalties to them and expect that
they make regular payments, when in fact the vast majority are
unable to do so.”

Many fees can be waived for indigent defendants, but judges are
more likely to put the poor on a more manageable payment plan.

Courts, however, will then sometimes tack on extra fees,
penalties for missed payments and may even charge interest.

In Washington state, for example, there’s 12 percent interest on
costs in felony cases that accrues from the moment of judgment
until all fines, fees, restitution and interest are paid off in
full. As a result, it can be hard for someone who’s poor to make
that debt ever go away. One state commission found that the average
amount in felony cases adds up to $2,500. If someone paid a typical
amount — $10 a month — and never missed a payment, his debt would
keep growing. After four years of faithful payments, the person
would now owe $3,000.

Once you get trapped, often for the stupidest reasons, in this
roundrobin of fines and rights and privileges being taken away with
the failure to promptly pay them,

“There are a lot of things you can’t do. A lot of jobs you can’t
apply for,” says Todd Clear, who studies crime policy and is
provost of Rutgers University, Newark. “Lots of benefits you can’t
apply for. If you have a license, a driver’s license that needs to
be renewed, you can’t renew it. So what it means is you live your
entire life under a cloud. In a very real sense, they drop out of
the real society.”

In one county, NPR found “about a quarter of the people who were
in jail for misdemeanor offenses were there because they had failed
to pay their court fines and fees.”

Some macro-data on the problem:

The number of Americans with unpaid fines and fees is massive.
In 2011, in Philadelphia alone, courts sent bills on unpaid debts
dating back to the 1970s to more than 320,000 people — roughly 1 in
5 city residents. The median debt was around $4,500. And in New
York City, there are 1.2 million outstanding warrants, many for
unpaid court fines and fees.

The growth in the number of people who owe court-imposed
monetary sanctions shows up in surveys by the U.S. Department of
Justice, too: In 1991, 25 percent of prison inmates said they owed
court-imposed costs, restitution, fines and fees. By 2004, the last
time the Justice Department did the survey, that number climbed to
about 66 percent.

Many of these are not statutory punishments for the
crime but just fees charged as a matter of court and city and
county government policy–because they think they need the money.
It can be a substantial cash cow for them.

It again reminded me of my last day in court, for a traffic
offense. (I was guilty as hell!) Every single other person
there—every one!—was in court facing fines over a thousand and
possible jail time over things that started with “minor” fines in
the less than a hundred to few hundred level—fines that because of
their wealth level they were unwilling, or because of lack of
general shit-togetherness didn’t manage, to pay on time. It’s a
crummy situation.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1wCcoXf
via IFTTT

That Time Tom Friedman Said the Iraq War Was All About Telling Muslims “To Suck. On. This.”

You know what happened 11 years ago, almost to the day (May 29,
2003)? Tom Friedman appeared on a very special episode of The
Charlie Rose Show
taped in Silicon Valley and delivered the
most batshit-stupid-crazy peroration EVER on why America was right
to invade Iraq. Short verson: BECAUSE 9/11.

Slightly longer version:

What they [Islamic extremists] needed to see was
American boys and girls going house to house—from Basra to
Baghdad—and basically saying:

Which part of this sentence don’t you understand?: You don’t
think we care about our open society? You think this [terrorism]
fantasy [you have]—we’re just gonna let it grow? Well, suck. on.
this. That, Charlie, was what this war was about. We coulda hit
Saudi Arabia….We coulda hit Pakistan. We hit Iraq because we
could.

How do people say this kind of stuff not just in public
but ON PBS and still have jobs?

Hat tip: Glenn Greenwald and Atrios.

Must-read: Matt Welch on “The
Simpletons: David Brooks, Thomas L. Friedman, and the banal
authoritarianism of do-something punditry
.”

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1o8BoPY
via IFTTT

U.S. Gasoline Consumption Plummets By Nearly 75%

Submitted by Jeff Nielsen via BullionBullsCanada blog,

Regular readers are familiar with my narratives on the U.S. Greater Depression, and (in particular) some of the government’s own charts which depict this economic meltdown most vividly. The collapse in the “civilian participation rate” (the number of people working in the economy) and the “velocity of money” (the heartbeat of the economy) indicate an economy which is not merely in decline, but rather is being sucked downward in a terminal (and accelerating) death-spiral.

However, even that previously published data, and the grim analyses which accompanied it could not prepare me for the horror story contained in data passed along by an alert reader. U.S. “gasoline consumption” – as measured by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) itself – has plummeted by nearly 75%, from its all-time peak in July of 1998. A near-75% collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption has occurred in little more than 15 years.

Before getting into an analysis of the repercussions of this data, however, it’s necessary to properly qualify the data. Obviously, even in the most-nightmarish economic Armageddon, a (relatively short-term) 75% collapse in gasoline consumption is simply not possible. Unless we were dealing with a nation whose economy had been suddenly ripped apart by civil war, or some small nation devastated by a massive earthquake or tsunami; it’s simply not possible for any economy to just disintegrate that rapidly, without there being some ultra-powerful exogenous force also at work.

So how can this raw data, produced by the government itself, be explained? To begin with; the government chooses to measure U.S. gasoline consumption in a very odd manner: by measuring the amount of gasoline entering the domestic supply-chain rather than by measuring actual consumption at the other end of the supply-chain – i.e. “at the pump”.

Why does the U.S. government, which (among other things) leads the world in the manufacture of statistics not produce any simple/direct measurement of gasoline consumption? How can the St. Louis Fed produce nearly 100 different charts on gasoline and diesel prices (for any/every price-category which can be imagined by these statistics geeks), but not a single chart on gasoline supply/demand?

There are several reasons for this unbalanced, anomalous, and simply absurd statistical methodology. First of all; the reason why the U.S. government produces a near-infinite number of charts on prices is because prices are what the Gamblers (i.e. bankers) use as the basis for their $100’s of trillions in gambling in the rigged casinos which the bankers call “markets”.

While supply/demand data is of utmost importance in the real world; the banker-gamblers don’t dwell in the real world. As regular readers already know; their derivatives casino, alone, is roughly twenty times as large as the entire global economy. To the bankers; the “real world” is nothing but fodder for their insane gambling.

Why use this data, at all, since it is such an inferior/distorted means of measuring U.S. gasoline consumption? Because the EIA uses exactly the same data to publish its own “estimates” of U.S. gasoline consumption:

Note: Product supplied measures the amount of gasoline that went into the supply chain and is used as a proxy for gasoline consumption. [emphasis mine]

The other half of this ridiculous statistical hodge-podge, where endless quantities of trivial/irrelevant price data are trumpeted, while any/all data which actually measures the (real) economy is suppressed (if not buried entirely) displays a government desperately trying to hide this massive economic collapse.

 

If you choose to measure the amount of gasoline leaving U.S. refineries and entering domestic inventories and call this “gasoline consumption”; you can hide the actual collapse in gasoline consumption – until those retail inventories are overflowing, and there is simply no more room in the storage tanks.

This is what we see today in the U.S.: a gasoline market which had been deliberately-and-dramatically over-supplied with gasoline at the wholesale end of the supply-chain (the refineries) has now practically ground to a halt. The same nation which previously amazed the world as it accumulated more automobiles and more miles of highways per capita than any nation on Earth (and by a huge margin) now has such an insane glut of gasoline that it’s massive chain of refineries have had to simply turn off the taps – until this pathetically anemic economy manages to burn-off some of that glut.

This conclusion becomes even more visible/obvious when we view the gasoline data just from the start of the mythical “U.S. economic recovery” to the present. At the start of the “U.S. recovery”; U.S. gasoline consumption was at a rate of 52 million gallons per day (already more than 20% below the 1998 all-time peak). In the five years since the start of this pretend-recovery; U.S. gasoline consumption has fallen all the way to 18 million gallons per day.

Since the beginning of “the U.S. economic recovery”; U.S. gasoline consumption has plummeted by nearly 2/3. As the pseudo-recovery began, and supposedly “strengthened”; U.S. refineries were ordered to fill up the inventories of their dealer network, in anticipation of the increased gasoline consumption which would have occurred in any real “recovery”.

But there never was an increase in U.S. gasoline consumption, because there never was a U.S. economic recovery. Rather, the Greater Depression has simply (and relentlessly) continued to pulverize the U.S. economy like a meat-grinder. To hide this devastation (as well as is possible), the government produces a wide array of its pseudo-statistics, that all contain myriad “adjustments” – which make it possible for these liars-with-numbers to distort the statistical picture of the U.S. economy beyond recognition.

Meanwhile, any/all statistics which measure raw data (and thus cannot be perverted with “adjustments”) are either suppressed (like the civilian participation rate), or not even measured, at all – as is the case with U.S. gasoline consumption. At the retail end; none of the “sales” statistics are adjusted for inflation, not even with the absurdly-fraudulent “CPI” numbers.

By not deflating sales data (at all) the collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption “at the pump” is hidden within all this unreported inflation. As explained in previous commentaries; it is this same, unreported inflation which allows the U.S. to convert its large, negative, GDP readings (which would otherwise reveal the Greater Depression) into “economic growth”. It is this same, unreported inflation which allows the government (and employers) to hide the fact that U.S. wages have collapsed by more than 50%.

But what the liars-with-numbers cannot hide (any longer) is the collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption which has accompanied the continued, downward spiral of the Greater Depression. The storage tanks are now all full. The only way to (temporarily) hide the collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption any further would be to construct even more storage facilities. However, there is no possible economic justification for increasing storage capacity in a market of steadily/relentlessly declining demand.

Indeed, the exact opposite is true. The U.S. economy of the 21st century (a mere hollowed-out husk of what it was only 20 years earlier) will require less and less gasoline storage facilities over time, reflecting a supply network for a steadily shrinking market. As the One Bank completes its plundering of the U.S. economy, and completes its transformation of the U.S. Middle Class into the Working Poor, it is also simply using up more and more of its economic lies.

The Great Inflation Lie will continue to allow the U.S. government (and other Western governments) to crank-out absurd/imaginary positive numbers for GDP. It will continue to allow the U.S. government to crank-out absurd/imaginary numbers for retail sales (and hide the ongoing collapse of the entire U.S. retail sector).

But it can’t hide the fact that U.S. refineries have nearly stopped producing gasoline for the most-motorized society/economy the world has ever seen. It can’t hide the fact that there haven’t been so few people working in the U.S. economy (on a percentage basis) in 35 years.

Readers who are stubbornly faithful to the plethora of pseudo-statistics which the U.S. government uses to hide this collapse may have been skeptical of my original denunciation of the “U.S. economic recovery”. They may have been more skeptical with assertions that this Wonderland Matrix of lies is being used to hide a Greater Depression.

However, there is no further room for skepticism when official, government numbers indicate a near-75% collapse in U.S. gasoline consumption over a mere 15 years, and a 65% collapse in consumption since the start of the (supposed) Recovery. Numbers such as this can only be encapsulated with acronyms like “DOA”.

When we look at the EIA’s “gasoline consumption” numbers, and when we see the St. Louis Fed’s chart of the U.S. velocity of money (heartbeat of the U.S. economy); we don’t see an economy which is dying. We see an economy which is already dead.

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1wC7nhp Tyler Durden

Why There’s Still Hope: Reporters Openly Laugh at State Dept. Flack

Via Hot Air‘s
Erika Johnsen
comes this clip of reporters laughing at State
Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki’s attempt to valorize President
Barack Obama’s foreign policy record.

A partial transcript:

JEN PSAKI: I would argue the president doesn’t give himself
enough credit for what he’s done around the world, and that’s
how the secretary feels too. We would not be engaged in
comprehensive negotiations with Iran, which is where the
program is stalled and is rolling back, if it were not for the
role of the United States, along with the P-5 plus one
partners, certainly. Ukraine, we’ve been engaged more or as
much as any other country in the world in supporting the
elections process and supporting the government and supporting
their efforts moving forward. Yes, there’s more work that
needs to be done. The point is, we need to continue to stay at
it. …

REPORTER: Credit for what? I’m sorry, credit for what?


More here.

Bonus clip (via Free Beacon
via Hot Air again): NBC’s Richard Engel being whether there are any
countries with whom relations have improved under President
Obama.

“I think you would be hard pressed to find that,” Engel
said….”I think the reason is our allies have become
confused.”

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1rqGvko
via IFTTT

Home Equity Loans Jump 8% as Broke American Serfs Scramble for Cash

Screen Shot 2014-05-30 at 3.15.18 PM With real incomes stagnant and the cost of everything from food, school tuition and healthcare premiums skyrocketing for millions of Americans, it appears that borrowing against one’s home is once again a key source for consumption, if not survival, for the nearly extinct socio-economic demographic known as the middle-class.

The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that home-equity lines of credit (Helocs) had increased at a 8% rate year-over-year in 1Q14. Some banks are more aggressive than others, and perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised to see TBTF government welfare baby Bank of America leading the charge, with $1.98 billion in Helocs in the first quarter, up 77% versus 1Q13.

From the WSJ:

A rebound in house prices and near-record-low interest rates are prompting homeowners to borrow against their properties, marking the return of a practice that was all the rage before the financial crisis.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/1o8oe5x
via IFTTT

Colorado Orders Baker to Make Gay Wedding Cakes; Also Ordered to File Reports and Reveal Customer Names

Nobody should have a right to this cake. A baker in Colorado who became
a center of controversy over his refusal (on religious grounds) to
bake a cake for a gay couple’s wedding has been told he may not
engage in such discrimination. This decision from the state’s civil
rights panel today affirms a ruling from a judge, so it’s not
actually a new thing. However, what is new is the rather insulting
and problematic additional demands from the panel. From
The Denver Post
:

In its decision, the panel required [baker Jack] Phillips to
submit quarterly reports for two years that show how he has worked
to change discriminatory practices by altering company policies and
training employees. Phillips also must disclose the names of any
clients who are turned away.

By what legal authority does the panel make these demands of
Phillips? I’m not even speaking philosophically. I disagree with
Colorado’s public accommodation discrimination laws, but at least
they are actual laws. The Colorado
Civil Rights Commission
is a made of unelected appointees from
the governor. I looked through the commission’s
list of rules
(pdf), and while the 56-page document is full of
all sorts of guidelines on how discrimination hearings should take
place and pages upon pages of rules regarding employment
discrimination, it doesn’t actually have a lot to say about what
sort of remedies the commission is able to enforce, other than
giving plaintiffs clearance to sue. But I am not a lawyer and could
have missed all sorts of stuff in my skimming. (Also of note: It is
against the law in Colorado to put up a sign in a business that
says anything similar to “We reserve the right to refuse service to
anyone”). By what right does Colorado claim to be able to demand
the names of Phillips’ non-clients? Doesn’t that violate the
privacy of a third party completely unconnected to this case?

Also of note: The Civil Rights Division offers the kind of

training
they’re trying to force Phillips to provide (even
though employee training had nothing to do with this case), so
that’s a nice bit of potential make-work for themselves.

We’ve written extensively about the how these public
accommodation laws violate the freedom of association rights of
businesses and the religious freedoms of their owners.
Jacob Sullum wrote most recently
in our June issue about how
such laws (and laws mandating businesses pay for birth control for
their employees) are essentially a form of conscripted private
service.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1mSs6rY
via IFTTT