Lawsuit Accuses Cops of Rape, Florida Police Department of Habitually Ignoring Complaints

alleged rapistsTwo women are suing the city of Lauderhill,
Florida and two police officers, Franklin Hartley
and Thomas Merenda for an alleged rape for
which the two cops, on unpaid administrative leave, are already
facing criminal charges. They allege in their lawsuit that the
police department “hires violent and dangerous individuals as
police officers” and regularly fails to investigative complaints
about cops.

What’s being alleged,
via The Sun Sentinel
:

According to the lawsuit, the women had drinks at the Vegas
Cabaret strip club on University Drive in Lauderhill and left when
it closed at 4 a.m. Within minutes, Hartley pulled them over in a
Taco Bell drive-through in Tamarac.

After taking the driver’s vehicle registration and insurance
documents, the lawsuit says Hartley ordered the women to follow him
and led them to the back of a closed tire shop at 7300 West
Commercial Blvd. Moments later, Merenda showed up in his patrol
car.

Hartley took Jane Doe 1 to the front of his vehicle and under
threat of arrest ordered her to perform oral sex and then raped
her, the lawsuit says.

Merenda, according to the suit, remained with the driver at the
rear of his vehicle and “engaged her in [bizarre] conversations
about his family, wife and marital problems.”

After the rape, the suit alleges that the officers swapped women
and fondled their breasts and genitalia.

GPS data shows that both patrol cars remained at the location
for more than 90 minutes, according to the suit.

According to the lawsuit, the two officers were the target of
another suit in 2012 over an alleged false arrest which was settled
for $75,000 and never led to any disciplinary actions. The lawsuit
also lists four other cops lawyers accuse the department of not
disciplining appropriately in their attempt to show the
department’s pattern of not holding officers accountable for their
actions.

Hartley and Merenda face felony charges of unlawful compensation
and a misdemeanor charge of battery—the officers are also accused
in the criminal complaint of coercing one of the women to punch
Merenda in the genitals, because apparently he liked nut
punches.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1qR7zrR
via IFTTT

Obama Says Boehner Lawsuit Is a ‘Stunt,’ Tea Party Leader Dead, Mexican Chopper Fires on Border Patrol: P.M. Links

  • President Obama
    says
    that House Majority Leader John Boehner’s threat of a
    lawsuit against him is just a “stunt.”
  • Mississippi Tea Party leader Mark Mayfield was found
    dead of a gunshot wound
    today. The activist, who was recently
    arrested on conspiracy charges for allegedly photographing the
    bedridden wife of Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), likely committed
    suicide according to police.
  • A Mexican military helicopter apparently flew into the U.S. and

    fired on border patrol agents
    in the early hours of
    Thursday.
  • The New York Supreme Court wants the data of 400 Facebook
    users
    , an “unprecedented request [that] is by far the largest
    we’ve ever received … and we have argued that it was
    unconstitutional from the start,” according to a
    representative from the social media site.
  • $76 million in federal, state, and bridge toll money will fund
    a
    suicide net
    for the Golden Gate Bridge.
  • Ukraine’s new president signed a
    trade liberalization deal the E.U.
    The previous administration
    nixed the agreement last November, lighting the fuse for much of
    the current mess that the nation is in. 

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter,
and don’t forget to
 sign
up
 for Reason’s daily updates for more
content.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1nQeNpO
via IFTTT

David Harsanyi Toasts Tom Tancredo’s Loss

On Tuesday night, former Rep. Bob Beauprez beat a
slate of Colorado Republicans—including, most notably, former
presidential candidate Tom Tancredo—in the GOP primary for
governor. Mitt Romney and other hated/beloved GOP establishment
types had endorsed Beauprez, who was clearly the most electable
candidate available to face current Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper
in November.

But more importantly, the state GOP did not want Tancredo’s
tedious one-note campaign dragging down its entire ticket, writes
David Harsanyi. Because of his propensity for self-promotion and
the media’s propensity to blow out every uncompromising statement
he makes, the support Tancredo enjoyed among Colorado Republicans
and Tea Partiers has always been overestimated. 

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1nQeLOy
via IFTTT

Panic-Buying Melt-Up Rescues Stocks From Red Close

Before 330ET, the Nasdaq was the lone survivor in the green this week despite every effort to spark short squeezes and ramps day after day – but that all changed as the ubiquitous late-Friday buying panic occurred of course – lifting stock green for the day (and desperately searching for green on the week). There was a sudden heavy volume dump at 1315ET with no news catalyst amking many wonder if a dark pool puked its orders? A glance at the week's market moves would suggest 'volatility' is anything but low – yet we always manage to close day-to-day calmly. Wondering what provides the ammo for Nasdaq's rise? "Most shorted" stocks are up for the 7th week in a row. Despite all that idiocy, bond yields tumbled the most in 6 weeks and USDJPY fell the most in 14 weeks. Oil slipped on the week but copper, gold, and silver all gained. With the Rusell rebalance, volume was extreme today (but only at the close and that 1315ET dump).

 

Despite the idiocy on Friday afternoons – yet another epic buying panic in the last 30 minutes… Is this what humans do?

 

h/t arbitrage41

 

It was a busy week… Shittiest GDP print in 5 years, dismal consumption data, and European confidence and PMIs plunge (and Japanese macro data just collapsed)

  • JPY's biggest gain in 14 weeks
  • 10Y Yield's biggest drop in 6 weeks
  • USD Index worst week in 14 weeks
  • European stock's worst week in 14 weeks

"Most Shorted" stocks continue to surge back to what looks like a great double top forming (7th week in a row)…

 

On the day we saw three selling dumps (two of which were very odd)…

 

The sudden heavy volume dump at 1315 was odd – and no news catalyst appeared… one wonders if a dark pool puked its orders?

 

One glance at the week's action and it's clear something is not right…

 

But June has been a banner month for squeeze-driven rallies in high beta momo…

 

Stocks continue to ignore JPY carry and Bonds… for now…

 

 

Charts: Bloomberg

Bonus Chart: Unless the index falls 5% on Monday, the S&P 500 will close higher for six consecutive quarters – that is the first time since 1998.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jWfaOl Tyler Durden

Fact Or Fiction: Humanity Still Surprised That ‘Megalomaniacal Pricks’ Decide Everything

Fact or Fiction…

Noting that it has had thousands of years to develop a more agreeable option, humankind expressed bewilderment this week that it has yet to devise a better alternative to governing itself than always letting power-hungry assholes run everything, sources worldwide reported.

Individuals in every country on earth voiced their frustration that, in spite of generations of mistreatment, neglect, and abuse they have suffered at the hands of those in positions of authority, they continue to allow control over the world’s governments, businesses, and virtually every other type of organization and social group to fall to the most megalomaniacal pricks among them.

“We’ve all seen what this system leads to, so you’d think that by now, someone, somewhere would have sat down and thought up another way to keep our societies functioning without giving all the power to arrogant, amoral dicks whose only concern is improving their own status,” said Mumbai software designer Ankan Rao, one of 7.1 billion humans who conveyed continued surprise that their species has so far proven incapable of formulating a method of governance that was even slightly more tolerable. “Everybody dislikes the people in charge and everybody knows they’re only serving their own personal agendas at the expense of everyone else, but we just keep allowing these jerks to make our decisions time and time again. And it’s not just here—it’s everywhere in the world.”

“Boy, maybe we shouldn’t do that anymore,” Rao added. “Anyone have any better ideas?”

Speaking with reporters, citizens across the planet unanimously expressed their bafflement at the consistency with which they either formally or informally select corrupt and self-obsessed sacks of shit for leadership roles in all facets of life, including positions atop corporate boards, judicial and legislative bodies, religious institutions, parent-teacher associations, the military, intramural softball teams, and international and national professional associations, as well as groups of friends deciding where to eat.

In addition, sources offered countless examples of the counterproductive and perplexing practice of entrusting power to the world’s least scrupulous individuals, ranging in scale from a domineering dictator who plunges his country into civil war in order to consolidate his power, to a Foot Locker shift manager who forces his subordinates to close up without him so that he can go home early.

Moreover, everyone across the planet acknowledged that the tradition of allowing an exploitative asshole to take charge of a given situation has been the principal system for group decision-making from the earliest formation of tribal societies to the present day, an admission that caused each member of the human race to either emit an exasperated sigh, shake his or her head, or mutter a profanity.

“My old boss, my sorority president, my congressional representative, my current boss—they’ve all been soulless, backstabbing dickheads whose only concern is getting what they want,” said administrative assistant Sheryl Gittens of Fort Worth, TX, who went on to list the bully back in her seventh grade class, her homeowners association president, and the coordinator of her Bible study group among the legions of selfish jagoffs who have inexplicably been granted commanding roles by the acquiescent masses. “What’s even more annoying is that we essentially reward these people for only thinking of themselves and repeatedly screwing us over. If you stop and think about it, that’s pretty messed up.”

“Jesus,” she continued. “What the hell’s wrong with us?”

Given the prevalence throughout history of compassionless, two-faced leaders whose lust for control and inflated self-importance have led to disastrous results for society at large, many individuals questioned if, going forward, they should instead try giving power to someone other than a greedy, self-serving bastard.

“Maybe we should try letting a kind, responsible person run things for a change,” Cairo resident Nathifa Bakhoum told reporters. “I, for one, don’t want to be told what to do by another narcissist who’s drunk on power and who has absolutely no regard for my well-being. It’s just a thought, but perhaps we could go with a good, decent human next time, or at least someone who’s not a completely egotistical pile of dogshit. That seems like a good thing to try at least once, right? Could we even do that? It’s probably worth a shot.”

When pressed for further comment, however, every member of humanity agreed that the current system, though deeply flawed, remains far better than one in which they actually have to make decisions for themselves.

Source: The Onion




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/URp2TV Tyler Durden

Cops Shot at Retreating Arthritic Dog Toward House Filled with Children: Business as Usual

More in contemporary policing practice keeping you and yours
safe and sound, out of Mason County, West Virginia,
reported in the Charleston Daily Mail:

It starts with a bunch of police cars chasing a suspect in a car
down a not-much-traveled rural road. A family dog goes to
investigate when eight police officers and their dog in tactical
gear emerge from the woods near the Sweat family home. 

Then:

[Ginger Sweat’s] 6-year-old Basset hound/beagle mix, Willy Pete,
left the porch and made his way toward the troopers. The dog, she
said, suffered from arthritis in his back legs and was not
aggressive…

Sweat said she was still inside when she saw the trooper raise a
weapon at her dog.

“I ran out my door, jumping up and down screaming ‘don’t shoot
my dog, he won’t bite, just let me get him in the house,’” she
said.

She said the officer fired one shot toward the dog but missed.
She said Willy Pete turned tail and was running back toward
her.

“He ran towards me with desperation in his eyes,” she said.
“They fired again in my direction. In the direction of my home
where my kids were.”

She said three more shots were fired, a total of four shots.
Willy Pete, she said, was hit three times. The dog went to the back
of the mobile home. Sweat said she found the dog near the air
conditioning unit.

“I watched my dog struggle and then die,” she said. “I collapsed
in a puddle in the floor, screaming and crying.”

The police would rather not talk about this, and would you all
just calm the hell down, huh? We only shot a dog, for crying out
loud!

Lt. Michael Baylous, State Police spokesman, said troopers
sometimes will inform the public in similar situations with a media
burst or by going door to door, but that it was his understanding
there was no time for that in Tuesday’s case.

Baylous said officers still are searching for [Jonathan] Jeffers
[the suspect they were pursuing]. He declined comment on the
shooting of the dog.

“It’s counterproductive and it’s only serving to fan the
tension,” Baylous said. “We have had several people responding to
us in a very irrational way and we feel that it’s counterproductive
to comment further.”

Hat tip: reader Matthew Thomas

Reason on
cops shooting dogs
.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1pXIKbV
via IFTTT

Shutting Off Water To 150k Residents – Ukraine? No, Detroit!

The news that hundreds of thousands of people will lose water supplies is not a stunning headline anymore – poor old Ukraine… or Iraq. However, this time, the ‘it couldn’t happen here’ crowd might be stunned to hear that The Motor City is playing serious hardball with residents who have fallen behind on paying their water bills. Detroit’s Water and Sewerage Department has begun turning off the taps of 150,000 residents who are at least two months behind on payments. As one advocate notes, sick people have been left without running water and working toilets. People recovering from surgery cannot wash and change bandages. Children cannot bathe, and parents cannot cook.” Of course, given that these are generally voting members of the US public, we would be stunned if the Federal government did not create a new fund to ‘help’ them out of this ‘unfairness’.

 

As Yahoo reports, The Motor City is playing serious hardball with residents who have fallen behind on paying their water bills.

Detroit’s Water and Sewerage Department has begun turning off the taps of 150,000 residents who are at least two months behind on payments. People are being left without a drop to drink and no ability to bathe or use the toilet. Now a coalition of water and human rights activists has banded together to ask the United Nations to step in and end the disconnections.

 

Last week, advocates from the Detroit People’s Water Board, Food and Water Watch, Blue Planet Project, and Michigan Welfare Rights Organization submitted a comprehensive report to the U.N.’s special rapporteur that details the dire situation facing folks whose water has been cut off.

 

“Sick people have been left without running water and working toilets. People recovering from surgery cannot wash and change bandages. Children cannot bathe, and parents cannot cook,” write the report’s authors. And “families concerned about children being taken away by authorities due to lack of water and sanitation services in the home have been sending their children to live with relatives and friends, which has an impact on school attendance and related activities.”

In 2013, Detroit declared bankruptcy—it’s $18 billion in the hole. Half of the 323,000 customers served by the city’s Department of Water and Sanitation have either paid their bills late or simply can’t afford service, to the tune of $175 million.

Back in March, the department announced that it would be cutting service to residents who hadn’t paid up. Although the city claims that it started sending out notices about the disconnections in March, the report’s authors write that they heard “directly from people impacted by the water cutoffs who say they were given no warning and had no time to fill buckets, sinks, and tubs before losing access to water.”

 

“We really don’t want to shut off anyone’s water, but it’s really our duty to go after those who don’t pay, because if they don’t pay, then our other customers pay for them,” department spokesperson Curtrise Garner told Al Jazeera America. “That’s not fair to our other customers.”

However, activists claim the city has been unfairly overcharging Detroit residents for water to compensate for its significant financial woes.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 38.1 percent of Detroit residents are living below the poverty line. Despite the tough times many people are facing, they’ve been paying an average of $64.99 a month, significantly higher than the national average of about $40, and rates are only going up. The Detroit City Council just approved a nearly 9 percent rate increase for water.

“What we see is a violation of the human right to water,” Meera Karunananthan, an international campaigner with Blue Planet Project, told Al Jazeera America. “The U.S. has international obligations in terms of people’s right to water, and this is a blatant violation of that right. We’re hoping the U.N. will put pressure on the federal government and the state of Michigan to do something about it.”

Three U.N. human rights experts issued a statement on Wednesday, declaring that “disconnection of water services because of failure to pay due to lack of means constitutes a violation of the human right to water and other international human rights.”

“When I conducted an official country mission to the U.S. in 2011, I encouraged the U.S. government to adopt a federal minimum standard on affordability for water and sanitation and a standard to provide protection against disconnections for vulnerable groups and people living in poverty,” said Catarina de Albuquerque, who is the U.N.’s special rapporteur on the right to safe drinking water and sanitation. “I also urged the government to ensure due process guarantees in relation to water disconnection.”

 

One of the experts, Leilani Farha, who focuses on the right to adequate housing, also pointed out the racial implications of shutting off water to the nearly 83 percent black population. “If these water disconnections disproportionately affect African Americans, they may be discriminatory, in violation of treaties the U.S. has ratified,” said Farha.

Although the experts declared that “households [that] suffered unjustified disconnections must be immediately reconnected,” when was the last time the U.N. issued sanctions against an American municipality for human rights violations? In the meantime, 3,000 residents have lost their water, and Detroit plans to turn off the service of thousands more every week.

*  *  *

So people didnt pay their bills… advocates claim demanding payment for services rendered is capitalist exploitation (and racist)… and now the UN explains how that doesn’t matter, water is a right? Tell that to Cambodians?

Welcome to the free market America




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1veGpJ7 Tyler Durden

At the Core of the IRS Saga: Tax Collectors as Political Hitmen

Lois LernerIt’s all good fun to mock the Internal Revenue
Service’s plausibility-challenged explanations for just how
potentially embarrassing (to the IRS)  emails were
lost and why they can’t be recovered
, but let’s not forget
what’s at the core of the story: the tax collection agency’s

long and storied history as a political hitman
. IRS audits have
been targeted at political opponents of incumbent presidents, tax
information has been leaked about enemies of powerful members of
Congress, and the agency’s own employees have abused their power
for
personal reasons
.

We got a reminder of the IRS’s history earier this week when the
National Organization for Marriage, a socially conservative group,
announced the settlement of its lawsuit against the tax agency for
leaking information about donors, including 2012 Republican
presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

On Tuesday, the group announced:

In response to a lawsuit brought by the National Organization
for Marriage (NOM), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has admitted
wrongdoing in releasing the organization’s confidential tax return
and donor list which was obtained by the Human Rights Campaign
(HRC), NOM’s chief political rival. The IRS has agreed to pay NOM
$50,000 to settle the lawsuit.

Specifically, NOM’s 2008 tax return and donor list was turned
over to activist Matthew Meisel, who then gave it to the Human
Rights Campaign which distributed it to the media.

Not surprisingly, since the leaked information was used against
their last presidential candidate, Republicans on the House Ways
and Means Committee took an interest in the case. Congressional
pressure may well have induced the IRS to surrender, admit error,
and turn over a little cash it mugged from other taxpayers to make
nice with NOM, but it couldn’t get the Department of Justice to
take an interest in the case. Shocker.

“The DOJ’s refusal to take any action to protect taxpayers
demonstrates why this Committee, and the American people, cannot
trust their supposed investigation into the IRS targeting, let
alone the protection of the constitutional rights of
conservatives,”
complained House Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Dave Camp

(R-Mich.) the day the settlement was announced.

Well, same as it ever was. The IRS has never been a safe tool in
any administration’s hands. It never will be, so long as it remains
such a tempting weapon for whoever wields its excessive power.

Camp wants a special prosecutor to look into the IRS’s behavior.
But that behavior is inevitable, so long as anything as dangerous
as the IRS is allowed to exist.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1jW7RGq
via IFTTT

Common Core Tests: So Difficult, Bureaucrats Had to Implement a Curve Under Which Kids Can Guess Randomly and Still Pass

ClassroomWhat happens when bureaucrats
make eighth and ninth graders take standardized exams that test
them in accordance with trendy, horridly implemented standards?
Almost all of them fail, of course.

Knowing that this is precisely what would happen when New York
students took their Common Core–aligned math and English tests,
administrators introduced an incredibly generous curve so that
three-qurters of students would pass, regardless of their actual
scores.

In practice, this meant that students could score 5 out of 24 on
the multiple choice portion of the reading
comprehension section
and still pass the exam. That’s about the
score you would expect to get from randomly filling in bubbles,
write New York educators Carol Burris and John Murphy in

The Washington Post
:

After a poem by Langston Hughes, which is followed by five
questions, the student encounters a difficult passage from Carl
Sagan’s Broca’s Brain. The piece is abstract and
esoteric, asking the reader to shrink into a crystalline world of a
microgram of salt in order to see “rank upon rank of an ordered
array.” This may be an interesting piece on an AP exam, or an SAT
II in reading or science, but on a timed test that determines high
school graduation it is over the top.   English Language
Learners’ and weak readers’ eyes will glaze over before
encountering the 10 questions.

So what do the Common Core English Regents cut scores look
like?  Like the Common Core Algebra exam, the state wanted the
passing rate to stay the same (about 77 percent). The writing
section was weighed so heavily on this new exam, that the first
three readings and their 24 multiple choice questions were moot, at
least for passing. If a student earns a 4 out 6 on the written
argument, and a 2 out of 4 on the short responses, a student passes
the exam if she answers a mere 5 out of 24 questions correctly.
Five out of 24 is in the realm of pure chance. On the January
Regents —  the one that is being phased out — if a student
earned the same scores on the writing portion, they needed to
answer 20 out of 24 multiple-choice questions correctly in order to
receive a passing grade.  A more reasonable test can have
higher expectations for student performance.

Burris and Murphy were also critical of the math
test
, which utilizes confusing phrasing to create the illusion
of rigor, they argue:

Here is one example. Question 12 asks students to identify an
equation, written as a function, given two roots.  In the
past, the question would have been phrased:  “Given the roots
-6 and 5, which of the following would be the correct equation?”
Students are then given four choices.

Here is the Common Core phrasing: “Keith determines the
zeros of the function f(x) to be -6 and 5. What could be Keith’s
function?”

This is but one example of a question that was made
unnecessarily complicated and wordy in order to give the illusion
of a ‘real world’ problem that requires deep thinking. And then
there are the questions designed to give a window into the
student’s problem solving skills, such as question 34, which
includes, “Describe how your equation models the situation.”
 The “situation” refers to dimensions of a garden.  How
does an English language learner, with good math skills, begin to
understand what that question is asking?

Standardized testing, if used at all, should offer evidence that
a given set of educational standards is worthwhile. With the curve
in place, the test is pointless.

Of course, if the curve were removed, then thousands of students
would simply fail and be judged unfit for the next grade level or
employment (the point of Common Core–aligned testing is to render a
verdict of “college and career ready”).

One gets the impression that public education bureaucrats don’t
have their new system totally figured out, which is a shame for the
kids
bearing the brunt
of their experimentation.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1iCODuJ
via IFTTT

The Pentagon Has A Problem: “Vetting Moderate Al Qaeda Rebels Can Be Tough” – So Here Is A Simple Solution…

When we reported yesterday that Obama had submitted yet another $500 million funding request to arm “moderate” Syrian rebels as opposed to extreme al-Qaeda cannibals and other ISIS faithful, we noted the glaring oversight at the heart of this plan when we asked “how will Obama make the distinction? Well, that’s what polling is all about. To wit: “Excuse me, would you describe yourself as a moderate or extreme al-Qaeda jihadist. Answering affirmatively to the former assures you your own US-made Humvee and a few thousand bullets to shoot at US soldiers across the border in Iraq.” Today, none other than the Pentagon’s rear admiral John Kirby confirmed precisely these worries when he said, via Bloomberg:

  • KIRBY SAYS A LOT OF WORK NEEDED TO VET MODERATE SYRIAN REBELS
  • KIRBY SAYS CONCERNED ABOUT AID `ENDING UP IN THE WRONG HANDS’

While we share his sentiment (which we doubt is much of a concern to the US MIC as it will merely provide one set of US-made weapons to destroy another set of US-made weapons) we repeat that there is a very simple solution. It comes from Andy Borowitz, who appears to have read our mind, and is breathtakingly simple.

Presenting: The Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form

After announcing, on Thursday, that it would seek $500 million to help “train and equip appropriately vetted elements of the moderate Syrian armed opposition,” the White House today posted the following Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form:

Welcome to the United States’ Moderate Syrian Rebel Vetting Process. To see if you qualify for $500 million in American weapons, please choose an answer to the following questions:

As a Syrian rebel, I think the word or phrase that best describes me is:

A) Moderate
B) Very moderate
C) Crazy moderate
D) Other

I became a Syrian rebel because I believe in:

A) Truth
B) Justice
C) The American Way
D) Creating an Islamic caliphate

If I were given a highly lethal automatic weapon by the United States, I would:

A) Only kill exactly the people that the United States wanted me to kill
B) Try to kill the right people, with the caveat that I have never used an automatic weapon before
C) Kill people only after submitting them to a rigorous vetting process
D) Immediately let the weapon fall into the wrong hands

I have previously received weapons from:

A) Al Qaeda
B) The Taliban
C) North Korea
D) I did not receive weapons from any of them because after they vetted me I was deemed way too moderate

I consider ISIS:

A) An existential threat to Iraq
B) An existential threat to Syria
C) An existential threat to Iraq and Syria
D) The people who will pick up my American weapon after I drop it and run away

Complete the following sentence. “American weapons are…”

A) Always a good thing to randomly add to any international hot spot
B) Exactly what this raging civil war has been missing for the past three years
C) Best when used moderately
D) Super easy to resell online

Thank you for completing the Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form. We will process your application in the next one to two business days. Please indicate a current mailing address where you would like your weapons to be sent. If there is no one to sign for them we will leave them outside the front door.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1lxgmfC Tyler Durden