Month: July 2014

Meet XKeyscore – "a computer network exploitation system", as described in an NSA presentation, devoted to gathering "nearly everything a user does on the internet." The German site Das Erste has exposed the shocking truth about the rules used by the NSA to decide who is a "target" for surveillance. While the NSA claims to only "target" a small fraction of internet users, the perhaps unsurprising truth is very different. As Boing Boing concludes, one expert suggested that the NSA's intention here was to separate the sheep from the goats — to split the entire population of the Internet into "people who have the technical know-how to be private" and "people who don't" and then capture all the communications from the first group.

As Das Erste describes it,

The NSA program XKeyscore is a collection and analysis tool and "a computer network exploitation system", as described in an NSA presentation. It is one of the agency’s most ambitious programs devoted to gathering "nearly everything a user does on the internet." The source code contains several rules that enable agents using XKeyscore to surveil privacy-conscious internet users around the world. The rules published here are specifically directed at the infrastructure and the users of the Tor Network, the Tails operating system, and other privacy-related software.

And Cory Doctorow of Boing Boing summarizes,

In a shocking story on the German site Tagesschau (Google translate), Lena Kampf, Jacob Appelbaum and John Goetz report on the rules used by the NSA to decide who is a "target" for surveillance.

 

Since the start of the Snowden story in 2013, the NSA has stressed that while it may intercept nearly every Internet user's communications, it only "targets" a small fraction of those, whose traffic patterns reveal some basis for suspicion. Targets of NSA surveillance don't have their data flushed from the NSA's databases on a rolling 48-hour or 30-day basis, but are instead retained indefinitely.

The authors of the Tagesschau story have seen the "deep packet inspection" rules used to determine who is considered to be a legitimate target for deep surveillance, and the results are bizarre.

 

According to the story, the NSA targets anyone who searches for online articles about Tails — like this one that we published in April, or this article for teens that I wrote in May — or Tor (The Onion Router, which we've been posted about since 2004). Anyone who is determined to be using Tor is also targeted for long-term surveillance and retention.

 

Tor and Tails have been part of the mainstream discussion of online security, surveillance and privacy for years. It's nothing short of bizarre to place people under suspicion for searching for these terms.

More importantly, this shows that the NSA uses "targeted surveillance" in a way that beggars common sense. It's a dead certainty that people who heard the NSA's reassurances about "targeting" its surveillance on people who were doing something suspicious didn't understand that the NSA meant people who'd looked up technical details about systems that are routinely discussed on the front page of every newspaper in the world.

 

But it's not the first time the NSA has deployed specialized, highly counterintuitive wordsmithing to play games with the public, the law and its oversight. From James Clapper's insistence that he didn't lie to Congress about spying on Americans because he was only intercepting all their data, but not looking at it all; to the internal wordgames on evidence in the original Prism leak in which the NSA claimed to have "direct access" to servers from Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Apple, etc, even though this "direct access" was a process by which the FBI would use secret warrants to request information from Internet giants without revealing that the data was destined for the NSA.

I have known that this story was coming for some time now, having learned about its broad contours under embargo from a trusted source. Since then, I've discussed it in confidence with some of the technical experts who have worked on the full set of Snowden docs, and they were as shocked as I was.

One expert suggested that the NSA's intention here was to separate the sheep from the goats — to split the entire population of the Internet into "people who have the technical know-how to be private" and "people who don't" and then capture all the communications from the first group.

Another expert said that s/he believed that this leak may come from a second source, not Edward Snowden, as s/he had not seen this in the original Snowden docs; and had seen other revelations that also appeared independent of the Snowden materials. If that's true, it's big news, as Snowden was the first person to ever leak docs from the NSA. The existence of a potential second source means that Snowden may have inspired some of his former colleagues to take a long, hard look at the agency's cavalier attitude to the law and decency.

*  *  *

And just this week it was all found perfectly legal… But it appears the US continues to make friends wherever it goes…

The German attorney Thomas Stadler, who specializes in IT law, commented: "The fact that a German citizen is specifically traced by the NSA, in my opinion, justifies the reasonable suspicion of the NSA carrying out secret service activities in Germany.

 

For this reason, the German Federal Public Prosecutor should look into this matter and initiate preliminary proceedings."

So now you know – you are all being watched…

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1mcGmMS Tyler Durden

2014 has not been kind to Barclays: first, the UK bank proved countless goldbugs right when it was first caught rigging the gold market (the first documented case, not the last) and a few short weeks later, the New York Attorney General crucified the bank for misleading its Dark Pool clients, and letting their order flow be, quite lucratively, front run by “aggressive” predatory algos – something it explicitly had stated it won’t allow. So with one after another revenue stream crashing before its eyes, what is the Chairman of the scrambling bank to do? Why beg to at least keep the FX manipulation going.

What follows is not from The Onion. It is from FT:

The foreign exchange market needs “fine tuning” rather than heavy handed reform, the chairman of Barclays argued on Thursday, as he unveiled a new compliance academy aimed at raising standards within the bank.

 

Sir David Walker said that while the forex market was “vulnerable to taint” it had worked well for a very long time and that the focus now should be on ensuring better conduct by traders.

Translation: it may be rigged, but it’s rigged in a way that makes the riggers money. As for everyone else, if only the regulators had kept their mouth shut, nobody would have been the wiser and we could just blame those fringe blogs accusing banks of manipulating various assets of being “conspriacy theorists.” Which reminds us: we need to send some more Christmas stocking “stuffers” to the FSA…

“There is some very intelligent, sensitive fine-tuning needed, but we should be wary of throwing the baby out with the bathwater,” he said.

Translation: let’s pretend to “fix” the rigging, slap the banks with a few thousand pound fine, and we can all go back to normal. After all, with all our HFT frontrunning revenue and kickbacks about to go down the drain, we need to make money somehow! Because if we go down… well, as Hank Paulson explained so clearly, the entire nation will follow.

Sir David said he wanted it to become a “world centre in excellence”, acting as a benchmark for compliance and leading to the creation of a new certificate in compliance.  Training of Barclays’ 2,100 compliance officers would take them beyond the job of policing fellow employees and encourage them to “mentor” colleagues on their behaviour. Barclays spends £300m a year on its compliance function.

Translation: now that all our market manipulation has been revealed for the whole world to see, it probably is a good idea to at least give lip service to complying with the laws and regulations. So we will just hire a few thousands chimps, dress them in business suits, and give them a banana: that way they can pass for “compliance” officers.

Sir David said it was “wholly appropriate” that regulators now look at the forex market and that some oversight may be needed, but that it was important not to “spoil” a market that worked effectively for most clients. George Osborne, the UK Chancellor, last month announced powers to regulate Libor would be extended to other benchmarks including forex.

Translation: those clients who were part of the rigging were very happy, and they also made tons of money, just like us, by taking advantage of everyone else who thought it was a fair, efficient and regulated market. If you continue pursuing this line of inquiry we will have to spill the beans about them too, and you don’t want to see the names we will be forced to reveal. Who knows, it may go all the way up to Threadneedle Streeet.

And the conclusion:

[Sir David] acknowledged that the “animus” against banks was not going to go away soon, arguing that the current environment meant that banks were being treated as guilty until they proved themselves innocent. “I’m sorry to say that there will be accidents from time to time,” Sir David said at an event to announce the compliance academy. “They are not evidence of the failure of what we are rolling out. They are indicative that it takes time. We always have been very clear some of this stuff will take 5-10 years.”

Translation: Sir David, whose bank was just busted in the two biggest market manipulation scandals since the Libor scandal, where, oh snap, Barclays was one of the most guilty parties too, is confused why banks are treated as “guilty until proven innocent.” And yes: when you are manipulating every single market you participate in, well, you will get caught now and then and yes “accidents will happen.“

But so much for that: let’s all just sit back, take a third mortgage on the house, use the proceeds to buy GoPro, and look forward to Monday and the regularly scheduled upward melting market diversion produced and directed to make everyone forget just how rigged everything truly is.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vCs0GX Tyler Durden

By: Miha Zupan at: http://ift.tt/146186R

Over the past few years, Vietnam has suffered an economic downturn. In 2007/2008 the local economy started loosing steam and eventually crashed. Fast forward 6 years, things seem to be shaping up again and foreign investors are increasingly returning to the country they once fled. This is also due to the fact that the Vietnamese economy is in the process of bottoming out while other regional (and global) markets are reaching new all time highs.

I have spent the last few weeks in Vietnam and the consensus among the people I spoke to on the ground is optimistic. Having last visited the country in 2011, I was astonished by the development that the country has undergone in the past 3 years. And this is despite the bad economy!

There is a surprisingly dynamic start-up community on the ground, particularly in the e-commerce space. This is indeed fascinating when considering the fact that the internet is literally making its way into the country just now (interestingly, Vietnam is the fastest growing market for Facebook). Combine this with the young local population and you get a very exciting trend that many entrepreneurs are seeking to capitalize on.

One of those entrepreneurs is Don Phan. Don is an e-commerce entrepreneur and founder of taembe.vn, an online baby products store and Vietnamese adaptation of diapers.com.

A bit of a background about Don is in order. Don worked for Rocket Internet as a co-founder for Zalora Vietnam and director of foodpanda Vietnam. He previously held positions at Roubini Global Economics, Goldman Sachs, and Leopard Capital, and holds a bachelor’s degree from Yale University.

I met Don at a start-up weekend in Saigon and was impressed with his knowledge and obvious passion for business. More recently we caught up to discuss taembe and how his venture fits into the story of growing the local start-up community.

—————

Miha: Don, you come from a very diverse background. Could you give our readers an insight into your “previous life”?

Don: I worked as an analyst at a macroeconomic research firm and then at a regional private equity firm before joining Rocket Internet. This is where I got my first taste of start-up life. I helped build the fashion company Zalora and then managed the online food ordering company, foodpanda, both in Vietnam. I am now the founder of a diapers.com adaptation, taembe.vn. “tã em bé” is the Vietnamese word for “diaper”.

I have experience selling clothes, food, and now, baby products, all online.

Miha: You worked for all these institutions before joining Rocket Internet. How have you found the transition from institutional type companies to a far more entrepreneurial role?

Don: Being an entrepreneur is much more rewarding and stimulating. Rocket Internet removed the mystery of what an entrepreneur goes through. The process of setting up a company, doing the legal paperwork, and hiring staff was already something I was familiar with by the time we decided to start taembe.vn.

Miha: Rocket Internet has had some amazing home runs by using a model of copying. There are those who disparage them but the truth is that the model is very successful. What do you see as opportunist areas to target in this respect?

Don: Vietnam is a developing market, so I think it is important to import models that have already worked elsewhere. As an entrepreneur, there is no point in taking on business model risk AND market risk. I am happy to take someone else’s successful blueprint and execute it in Vietnam.

What other opportunities do I see? An Alibaba model in Vietnam is the biggest opportunity I see. The original Alibaba business model provides a link between Chinese manufacturers and overseas buyers. Since so much manufacturing has moved to Vietnam because of rising labor costs in China, I see a large opportunity. Any online business is trying to get a sizable chunk of a much larger analog market, whether it’s fashion retail, food delivery, or baby products. An Alibaba adaptation for Vietnam would be trying to capture a chunk of Vietnam’s international trade. That is a great opportunity.

I think Alibaba will struggle here because it is the most famous Chinese e-commerce company in the world. Vietnamese folks tend to reject things associated with the Chinese, so there is an opportunity for someone else to come in if they are quick.

Also, GlassDoor, the job reviews site, would work really well here. A Glassdoor adaption recently launched in Korea: jobplanet.co.kr.

I loved GlassDoor when I was applying for jobs, because I could read negative reviews about companies from insiders. This is invaluable to job seekers. There are some very successful job sites in Vietnam, but there are reasons they won’t go into this business. The incumbent job sites rely on revenue from corporate clients who would likely be the ones getting negative reviews.

Miha: I think you’ve made a great point on reducing uncertainty as an entrepreneur. I’m curious, what made you venture into the baby products niche? I would imagine that a sizable young population of Vietnam had something to with it.

Don: Right, the macro opportunity was the most striking thing. The demographics in Vietnam are great. Over 60% of the population is under the age of 35, more than half under 30. There are 1.5 million babies born each year. I constantly see babies.

As our company name implies, we spend a lot of our time focusing on the diapers category because it is deceptively large. Huggies, Pampers, and Bobby are all very big brands backed by billion dollar companies, (Kimberly-Clark, Procter & Gamble, and Unicharm respectively). The large diaper companies see the opportunity in Vietnam, so they are investing heavily in order to win the market share. At the same time they are competing fiercely with higher-end Japanese brands that are rapidly gaining market share. We are working with them to help them gain market share among tech savvy mothers.

We are also benefiting from the large number of women entering the workforce who find themselves with much less time available to focus on their careers and care for their families. This is why our company motto is “làm m? d? dàng h?n”, or “Making Mom’s Life Easier”.

Other than the e-commerce part, we are a pretty boring business. We are a fast-moving goods retailer that happens to do a large portion of our transactions online. Once the novelty of e-commerce wears off in Vietnam, I think people will realize just how boring we are.

Miha: I think taembe is a great example of how one can hit two birds with one stone, with two birds being young demographics and emerging e-commerce industry. Could you give us an insight into the general state of e-commerce in Vietnam?

Don: Vietnam’s e-commerce industry is growing rapidly since Rocket Internet arrived in 2012. According to government statistics, e-commerce revenue was $700 million in 2012 and then grew to $2.2 billion in 2013.

Miha: Indeed, e-commerce in Vietnam is experiencing astonishing growth and I was surprised about how vibrant the local e-commerce industry is. What are, in your opinion, the main drivers for that?

Don: Youthful demographics and the fast adaptation of mobile phones and tablets are driving growth here. Vietnam is Apple’s fastest growing market. We are already experiencing considerable growth on the mobile side and have had to adjust accordingly. The other big driver I should mention is that there are a lot of e-commerce entrepreneurs working to make this happen.

Miha: What are some specifics of doing e-commerce in a developing country like Vietnam?

Don: Online payment has not caught on yet in a big way, but I am guessing Vietnam may skip to mobile payment like it has in Kenya. We primarily deal with cash on delivery and bank transfers. Online bank transfer is actually very convenient in Vietnam.

Miha: Speaking of delivery, could you shed some light on how does delivery work?

Don: In Vietnam, the delivery infrastructure is not very good. It has been more cost-effective for us to build delivery in-house. We have a team of drivers who handle deliveries. Customers buying from us have already run out of diapers, so speed is a necessity.

The operations of our company are closer to a pizza delivery company. Domino’s and Pizza Hut also take payment through cash-on-delivery (COD).

Miha: As you said, speed is a necessity, so this definitely makes sense. Where do you see the local e-commerce market headed?

Don: Since I moved to Vietnam, the older and wiser e-commerce veterans all told me to look to China instead of the U.S. to understand where the market is headed. Alibaba founder Jack Ma says “E-commerce in the States is a dessert, but in China it has become the main course”.

Jack Ma believes that because infrastructure is so good in the United States, this tends to benefit retail over e-commerce. Jack Ma’s narrative for e-commerce and economic development makes sense to me. We both believe technological adaptation will progress faster than infrastructure development in many developing markets, allowing e-commerce to grab larger market share than it would in developed countries. None of the retailers in Vietnam are nearly as good as Target or Wal-Mart in the US.

In the US, e-commerce was only 6.2% of retail last quarter. E-commerce can be a much larger share of retail in China, Vietnam, and other developing markets. Ten years from now, do I think e-commerce will make up more than 6.2% of overall Vietnamese retail volume? Yes, definitely.

China is currently going through an e-commerce frenzy right now, with private equity firms giving e-commerce companies very high valuations. I expect to see something similar in Vietnam and Southeast Asia within the next five years, possibly with some of the biggest Chinese companies attempting to make strategic acquisitions. Some questionable ventures will get eye-popping valuations, and then some strong ones will emerge. I hope we continue building a strong company that will outlast us.

—————

We are closely tracking multiple early stage private equity deals with our Seraph syndicate, and are looking to actively get involved in the Vietnamese start-up community. We will discuss this more in details at our upcoming Meet Up in Aspen in August. You can get more information about Seraph and the Meet Up here.

– Miha

 

“The difference between China e-commerce and US e-commerce is that e-commerce in the USA is what I call the dessert – it’s supplementary to their main business, because the USA’s infrastructure of doing business is so good. So it is very difficult for e-commerce in the USA to grow, to develop, to surpass the traditional business. But in China, because the infrastructure of commerce is too bad, then e-commerce becomes the main course.” – Jack Ma, founder of Alibaba

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jO5qFW Capitalist Exploits

Tomorrow, Americans will celebrate their independence from an over-taxing tyrant by eating and drinking to excess – and rightly so. However, what many will find as they pile into their friendly local grocer (Costco), is that the price of the July 4th smorgasbord has never (ever) been higher (as perhaps, just perhaps, another tyrannical entity – the Fed – has taxed them in a much more pernicious manner). Ground beef burgers have never been more expensive (+16.5% from last year)… and nor has white bread, American cheese, iceberg lettuce, tomatoes, ice cream, and chips…

 

Your July 4th Burger has never been more expensive… (up 16.5% from last year!!)

(wondering what the asterisks are – at significant inflection points in the price? Blue is Greenspan unleashing his dot-com bubble rescue plan and Red is Bernanke beginning his save-the-rich printing press plan to rescue Main Street from the banking crisis)

 

But it’s not just Burgers… Bloomberg has compiled an index of the seven staples of July 4th…The barbecue index tracks ground beef, white bread, American cheese, iceberg lettuce, tomatoes, ice cream and potato chips… and that has never been higher…

 

Happy 4th!

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1jO5qpB Tyler Durden

The last six months have not run according to anyone’s plan.  Who would have thought that equity market structure would yield a best-selling book, after all?  As ConvergEx’s Nick Colas notes, on the fundamental side of things, interest rates across the developed world are lower, not higher – counter to the consensus view just 180 days ago. Mutual fund investors first bought U.S. equities earlier in the year, then in the last 6 weeks have begun to liquidate in earnest. Exchange Traded Fund investors are buying more fixed income products than those dedicated to U.S. stocks. Large cap stocks are trouncing small caps in terms of performance. And as for volatility – well, Elvis has clearly left the building on that one. So which of these surprises has staying power into the back half of 2014?

Expect the market structure debate to continue, and look for higher interest rates and more of the same slow churn higher for stocks.  And that long awaited 10% correction?  Probably not until 2015 – which is only 189 days away…

Via ConvergEx’s Nick Colas,

What a year the first half of 2014 has been – one to humble the savviest prognosticator, really.  As the ball dropped in Times Square 176 days ago, the narrative for capital markets was blissfully simple:

Economic growth would accelerate in the US, stocks would do well, bonds would retreat, and investors would grow bolder in their equity allocations.

 

Small cap stocks would outperform large caps, if only because they had the wind at their sails as we exited 2013.

 

Equity markets had a good chance to see a 10% correction, probably early in the year.

We got exactly none of those outcomes, proving the old adage that “If you are going to predict the future, do it often.”  With that in mind, today we offer up a list of ‘Top Five Surprises of 2014’ and some comments about which of them has the staying power to make it to 2015.

Surprise #1: Market Structure Can Be Interesting.  The biggest surprise of the year is actually not from the world of economics or asset prices.  It is that, with a clever enough narrative, people outside the financial profession will care about the world of maker-taker pricing, high frequency trading, and how the plumbing of the U.S. equity markets actually works.  Michael Lewis’ “Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt” may no longer be on the Amazon best sellers list, but it’s still inside the top 150 and has over 1,500 customer reviews and a 4.5 star rating. Predictably, you can buy it as a bundle with Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the Twenty-First Century” if you click the “We’re All Doomed” package offer.

 

Easy prediction here: this issue isn’t going away.  SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White’s recent speech on market structure points to a lasting interest in the topic on the part of the Commission. No doubt the eventual alterations won’t be enough for some market watchers, but the Street is abuzz with chatter of the changes many traders expect to come in the next 6 months.

 

Surprise #2: Interest Rates Are Never, Ever Going Up Again – Or So It Feels, Anyway.  This was supposed to be the year where the U.S. Treasury curve steepened to reflect accelerating economic growth and the chance for greater inflation.  It was the “No Brainer” trade of the first half.  Turns out that the zombie-like move lower for rates explains the lack of brains.  Momentum, disappointing economic growth during a tough winter, a still sluggish labor market with few signs of wage inflation, a Europe on the brink of deflation – the list of reasons for a bond market rally this year are long and distinguished.

 

So where do we go from here?  It is hard to imagine a world where both 10-Year Treasury yields at 2.56% and the S&P 500 at 1960 are sustainable levels.  Either bonds are right and U.S. economic growth will remain moribund, or equity prices correctly reflect a better second half.  Yes, bond investors tend to get these calls right more often than their equity brothers and sisters, but we are going to side with stocks here.  Bond yields should back up in the second half, to the 3% on 10-year levels we had at the beginning of 2013.  The reasons – slightly better economic growth (2.0-2.5% GDP for 2H 2014) and the end of the Federal Reserve’s bond buying program.  A little more inflation – visible, CPI headline and core inflation – would be helpful too.

 

Surprise #3 – Retail Investors Are Back!  Well, they were for a while.  According to the Investment Company Institute, mutual fund investors in the U.S. finally started to buy domestic equity funds from January to April 2014, to the tune of $18 billion. The bad news?  Since the first week of May, they have redeemed $15 billion. The trend is not U.S. stock’s friend here.  Looking at Exchange Traded Fund money flows, courtesy of our friends at www.xtf.com, and the data is modestly more positive. Total ETF money flows into U.S. listed products totals $69 billion year to date. Of that, $19 billion went to U.S. equity products. Not bad, until you consider that ETF investors added $22 billion to fixed income funds over the same period.

 

Calling money flows over the back half of 2014 into ETF products is pretty simple – it will likely run about $150 billion, or just over double the first half run rate.  December is usually a big month for ETFs with tax loss selling, so that’s the reason for the slightly better whole-year numbers.

 

As for retail investors into mutual funds, that’s a tougher call.  Keep in mind that from the March 2009 lows, mutual fund investors have redeemed just over $350 billion of assets from U.S. stocks funds.  Yes, into the teeth of a massive bull market, mutual fund holders have sold their positions all the way up.  Seasonally, the balance of the year is not generally good for mutual fund money flows, as higher income earners usually hit their contribution limits with the Q1 bonus payments.

 

So who is left to buy?  We can think of three constituents.  First are public companies themselves through their buyback programs.  Second are hedge funds chasing performance.  Lastly are individual investors buying single names.  We tend to believe that ETFs have replaced a lot of single-stock asset allocation decisions for this group, even if active traders still focus on individual names.

 

Surprise #4 – Small Caps RULE!…  Until they don’t. The Russell 2000, one of the most widely followed small cap indices out there, has been a major disappointment this year to date – up only 2.0%.   By contrast, the S&P 500 is up 6.0% and the CRSP Total Market Index (a market cap weighted index of the 1475 largest names by that measure) is up 5.8%. Now, taken over the last year, the performance numbers are very close – Russell up 23.1%, S&P 500 up 23.4%, and Total Market up 24.2%.

 

So will small caps start to outperform large caps now that their performance has reset to the market averages?  I tend to doubt it, for two reasons.  First, with the European Central Bank’s aggressive monetary policies – current and future – will create hope for a better 2015 on the continent.  Larger companies tend to have more overseas operations than smaller ones, so they stand to benefit from those moves. Second, the economic picture in the U.S. is likely going to remain tenuous for much of the third quarter and perhaps into the fourth. That pesky 2.56% yield on the 10-Year Treasury tells you all you need to know there.  Larger companies tend to be more defensive than higher-beta small caps, and investors looking for equity exposure will likely dust off the late-cycle playbook and move upstream just in case the hoped-for acceleration does not come to fruition.

 

Surprise #5: Elvis – and Volatility – Has Left the Building.   Aside from the surprising fact that Michael Lewis could get people interested in how stocks trade, the biggest surprise in 2014 thus far is that no one seems to care how stocks trade.  If they did, there would be more investors expressing divergent viewpoints and pushing volatility higher.  Instead, actual volatility remains low and options prices indicate that few people think that will change materially any time soon. The long run average of the CBOE VIX Index is 20; it currently sits at 11.6, or more than one standard deviation from the mean.

 

What will drive volatility back into the markets?  Yes, a large geopolitical shock is always good for jolting investors back to reality. So that could happen. But aside from that, it seems we are in for a long slow summer and early fall for 2014.  I was writing about the VIX back in 2007, the last time it got here.  And if you want to say “Aha! – that reversion in volatility averages will happen again!”, let me remind you that the VIX was also here in 2005.  And 2006.  Volatility, or the lack of, can linger far longer than you think possible. And one last word on the topic – the VIX tends to bottom for the year in December.  Not the summer.

In the end, it seems that the first half of 2014 is largely a prologue for the second half. Would it be nice to get more volatility (better opportunities to find mispriced securities) and see rates back up (pushing money into stocks)?  Yes on both counts. And we should get some movement on rates. But as for stocks, volatility seems to be more of a 2015 game.  But don’t feel bad – that is only 189 days away.

via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1lCS0w4 Tyler Durden