GOP Senate Pickups: 3 and Counting

At the begining of election night, the Republican Party needed
to pick up six seats in the United States Senate in order to take
control of the body from Democrats and turf out Harry Reid as
majority leader. With a Republican trend assumed from the
beginning, GOP gains so far are:

West Virginia

Shelley Moore CapitoShelley Moore Capito (R, pictured at right)
defeats Natalie Tennant (D) to turn this open West Virginia Senate
seat from blue to red. A member of the U.S. House of
Representativesince 2001, she was the first candidate of the
evening to bring the GOP’s goal a little closer.

Arkansas

Tom Cotton (R) takes the seat from Mark Pryor (D), the incumbent
since 2003 in this Senate seat. Pryor was the first incumbent
senator of the evening to be knocked off.

South Dakota

Mike Rounds becomes the third Republican pickup of the evening,
defeating two major candidates, Rick Weiland (D), and Larry
Pressler (I), a former Republican Senator running this year without
a party affiliation.

Seats still needed to gain control of the Senate: 3.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1uth8Qb
via IFTTT

Is 2014 About Racism? Pa. Elects Candidate Who Once Chaired Campaign Committee of Ex-Cop Who Shot a Black Woman During Race Riots

Lot of bullshit
flying around
about how Republicans winning elections in a
country that voted for a multiracial candidate for president twice
means America’s full of racists. Maybe Republicans, who have had
little of a national theme outside of “Obama is a horrible
president” are winning tonight because, well, Obama is a horrible
president with horrible policies.

Nevertheless, race was an issue in races across the country, but
didn’t always get the attention you’d expect. In Pennsylvania, the

winning
gubernatorial candidate, Tom Wolf,
chaired
a campaign committee of a former cop, Charlie
Robertson, who shot a black woman during race riots in 1969.
Robertson was charged with murder but acquitted. Wolf’s a Democrat
so the story got little airplay in Pennsylvania. Wolf refused to
apologize for supporting Robertson, who served as mayor of York,
Pennsylvania, or to try to distance himself from him, claiming he’s
friends, too, with the current mayor of York, an
African-American.

Tom Corbett, meanwhile, loses despite a
last minute
push for the pro-cop vote in the form of a law
meant to keep convicts from speaking out if it hurts victims’
families’ feelings.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1x4uzVh
via IFTTT

Medical Marijuana Initiative Falling Short in Florida

As
expected
, it looks like Amendment 2, which would have
made Florida the first Southern state to approve medical use of
marijuana, is falling short of the 60 percent support it needs to
pass. With 69 percent of precincts reporting, the
results
are 57 percent in favor and 43 percent
against. John Morgan, leader of the Amendment 2 campaign,

said
he would try again in 2016 if the vote was close to the 60
percent threshold for constitutional amendments.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia
recognize
marijuana as a medicine, with rules ranging from
strict (e.g., New Jersey) to loose (e.g., California). Amendment 2
would have moved Florida toward the California end of that range,
allowing
marijuana use by patients suffering from nine specific conditions,
plus “other conditions for which a physician believes that the
medical use of marijuana would likely outweigh the potential health
risks for a patient.” 

Support for Amendment 2
plummeted
 between July, when a Quinnipiac University
poll found that 88 percent of voters favored the measure, and
October, when a Gravis
Marketing poll
 found that just 50 percent did. Opponents,
aided by $5 million in donations from Republican casino tycoon
Sheldon Adelson, argued that the regime established by the
initiative would be tantamount to general legalization, which they
said would lead to horrors such as
date rape
facilitated by pot cookies. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/10stLhj
via IFTTT

Maddow Calls Marijuana Legalization a ‘Clear Partisan Issue’

MaddowMSNBC talking head and relentless Democratic
partisan Rachel Maddow just suggested marijuana legalization as one
issue with a clear partisan breakdown. Did you know Democrats are
pro-pot and would surely legalize it if only those pesky
Republicans would let them?

To be fair,
it is true
that more Democrats support marijuana legalization
than Republicans. But long-time readers of Reason know
that it’s quite a bit more complicated than that. Younger voters
by-and-large support legal weed, regardles of their party
affiliation. Medical marijuana is increasingly supported by
Republicans; those in the conservative fold are also more and more
likely to favor
letting states set their own drug policies
rather than be bound
by federal government mandates. And while rank-and-file Democrats
are indeed more enlightened on pot than their Republican
counterparts, national Democratic leaders—including the one
currently occupying the White House—have done very little to honor
their base’s desire for less restrictive drug laws.

In fact, there is little doubt that Sen. Rand Paul, a
frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016,
supports a more sane approach to drug policy than does Hillary
Clinton, the likely Democratic presidential nominee. Just today,
Paul said that if D.C. voters wanted to legalize marijuana
they were welcome to do so
.

Bottom line: Support for drug decriminalization is rising on the
right, and some Republican leaders are taking initiative on the
issue. To be sure, many Republicans remain hopeless drug warriors,
but so do many Democrats. If Maddow wants to recast the
growing left-right consensus
on the insanity of marijuana
prohibition as some kind of partisan thing… well, maybe her
viewers like that sort of analysis, but it’s cynical and
dubious.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/10stMSc
via IFTTT

America Votes: The Midterm Elections

“Politics is the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds from the rich, by promising to protect each from the other” – Oscar Ameringer

And so it begins…

The key states:

State of Play:

House: 435 Seats, 400 Undecided, Results: Republicans 25 – 10 Democrats (1 Incumbents Lost)

Senate: 100 Seats, 32 Undecided, Results: Republicans 34 – 34 Democrats/Independents (0 Incumbents Lost)

*  *  *

Details:

As WSJ reports,

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky won a sixth term Tuesday as his party eyes its best chance in eight years to take control of both houses of Congress.

 

Mr. McConnell’s win against a strong Democratic challenger marks the first big election result of the night and positions the 72-year-old as the Senate’s next majority leader if Republicans manage to wrest the chamber from the Democrats in Tuesday’s midterm elections.

 

Hoping to capitalize on an unpopular president and a favorable political map, the GOP needs a net addition of six seats to gain sway over the Senate.

 

“Victory is in the air, we’re going to bring it home tomorrow night,” Mr. McConnell said at a closing rally Monday in Louisville. “After six years of borrowing and taxing and spending and regulation, these people need to be stopped, and it starts tomorrow night.”

*  *  *

Republicans have their first pick up of the evening:

Rep. Shelley Moore Capito defeats Democrat Natalie Tennant in race to succeed 5-term Democrat Jay Rockefeller, who is retiring.

 

Republicans need net gain of 6 seats to take control of Senate; analysts long had seen W. Va. pick-up likely for Republicans

 

Capito in 2000 became the first woman Republican to represent W.Va. in Congress; she is daughter of state’s former gov., Arch Moore

*  *  *

 

 

 

h/t @LibertyBlitz




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1qohZLs Tyler Durden

Anatomy Of A Failing State: Japan’s Budgetary Nightmare

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

Once the global economy rolls over into contraction, the tide will recede and Japan's fiscal and monetary bankruptcy will become painfully apparent.

What do you get after 25 years of stagnation and Keynesian Cargo Cult monetary stimulus? A failing state, that's what. The intellectually bankrupt ruling Elites of Japan have no solution for Japan's slow stagnation, as real reform would diminish their wealth and power.
 

So their only "solution" is to double-down on monetary stimulus: flood the enfeebled Japanese economy with more credit and fiscal stimulus, a.k.a. building bridges to nowhere: Japan's Monetary Pearl Harbor.

But reality isn't as immobile as failed policies. While Japan's ruling Elites fiddled away the past 25 years propping up sclerotic cartels and phantom loans, Japan's population has aged and its primary sources of wealth creation have atrophied.
 
We can see these trends in Japan's national budget. Before we dig into the numbers, we need to note that Japan's Ministry of Finance routinely announces an austerity budget for the next fiscal year around 92-95 trillion yen (TY), and then supplemental spending during the fiscal year pushes actual expenditures up to 100 TY.
 
According to Highlights of the Budget for FY2013/2014, the initial 2013 budget was 92 trillion yen, while the actual 2013 spending came in 10 trillion yen higher, at 102 trillion yen.
 
According to Japan's government looks to trim budget deficit, the national budget has hovered around 100 trillion yen for years.
 
So we have to take these 2013 spending estimates as lowball estimates that are 5%-10% below actual spending.
 
REVENUES: 92.6 trillion yen
Tax revenues: 43.0 TY
Other revenues: 4.0 TY
Government Bond Issues (borrowing): 42.8 TY
 
EXPENDITURES: 92.6 TY
National Debt Service (interest & bond redemptions): 22.2 TY
Social Security: 29.1 TY
Other: 41.2 TY
 
Debt service and Social Security are 120% of tax revenues. In other words, tax revenues don't even cover debt service and Social Security.
 
An astonishing 46% of the governments budget is borrowed money. Even with near-zero yields on Japanese government bonds (about 1%), 51% of tax revenues in 2013 were spent on national debt service.
 
The 2014 increase in the national consumption tax rate from 5% to 8% is expected to raise an additional 6 trillion yen of revenue in 2014, but that remains to be confirmed. If history is any guide, increases in national consumption taxes (a.k.a. value-added taxes or VAT) fail to generate the expected windfall of additional revenue, as consumers spend less.
 
Since Japan's GDP fell an astounding 6.8% after the tax increase took effect in April, it seems likely the revenues will disappoint official expectations.
 
Even if this new revenue comes in as expected, the amount being borrowed to fund government spending will only drop a modest amount, from 42.8 trillion yen to 41.2 trillion yen. Yee-haw.
Meanwhile, national debt service is expected to rise from 22.2 trillion yen to 23.2 TY.
 
It's difficult to see the tax increase as a panacea, as borrowing barely declines and debt service costs actually increase.
 
For context, we need to look at Japan's tax revenues, borrowing and spending over the past decade. Only then can we see why Japan is a failing state: tax revenues are as stagnant as the real economy, while spending rises as Japan's population of retirees soars.
 
In the decade since 2005, tax revenues actually declined slightly while annual borrowing increased by 8 trillion yen and expenditures rose by 10 TY. Virtually all of this increased spending comes from higher Social Security costs, which rose from 20 TY to 30 TY as the demographics of Japan's aging population inexorably pushes retirement and healthcare costs up.
 
You see what's happening: tax revenues are unchanged while interest and Social Security costs keep rising. A relatively modest increase in the consumption tax triggered a major meltdown in Japan's gross domestic product, and the planned increases in this tax from 8% to 10% are attracting criticism: Next consumption tax raise painting Abe into a corner.
 
If it turns out that the tax hike generates little additional revenue, Japan's path to failed-state will be set: a stagnant economy generating stagnant tax revenues, a central state that funds half its spending with new debt, and rapidly rising social welfare and debt service costs that are already consuming all the tax revenue and then some.
 
Can Japan continue down this path indefinitely? Many believe the answer is "yes," but we cannot base the next 10 years on the previous 25 years. Since Japan's financial bubble popped in 1989, the Internet and China greatly boosted global growth, enabling Japan to live off its well-oiled export and debt machinery.
 
But the engines of global growth have reached diminishing returns, and a prolonged global recession looms just ahead. Playing games such as devaluing Japan's currency and monetizing Japan's ballooning debts with freshly issued money does nothing to fix the rot beneath the bright neon lights of superficial wealth.
 

Once the global economy rolls over into contraction, the tide will recede and Japan's fiscal and monetary bankruptcy will become painfully apparent.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1s1jL4M Tyler Durden

McConnell Holds on in Kentucky, Other 7:00p.m. Results

Senate
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) holds
on to his seat
against Democratic challenger Alison Lundergan
Grimes. The Libertarian candidate, David Patterson, currently has
2.35 percent. (Results
here
).

In South Carolina, Republican Nikki Haley was elected to a
second term as
governor
.

Get results all night at Reason 24/7 and at the 24/7 Twitter feed.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1vFvloj
via IFTTT

Goldman Shows “Equity Bust” Risk Highest Since 2008

With the equity market back to near-historical highs, Goldman Sachs' Jan Hatzius revisits his analysis of the predictability of asset price busts. The main predictors of busts are past asset price appreciation and past credit growth, followed by a rising investment/GDP ratio. Hatzius warns that their model says that the further US equity price gains of 2014 have pushed the risk of an equity bust back up – as the chart below shows to levels not seen since 2008/9.

Goldman's "equity bust" model is back at levels last seen in 2008/9 – though obviously well off the peak levels, as the main factor holding down the risk of another bust, especially in the housing market, is the weakness of credit growth since the crisis.

 

The Goldman "Bust" Model

Earlier this year, we presented an analysis of the predictability of equity and housing market busts in advanced economies, focusing particularly on asset price downturns that are associated with a recession. With stocks back to near-record levels, it may be a good time to revisit that analysis.

 

To recap, our analysis uses quarterly data for 20 advanced economies on house prices, equity prices, and a set of economic and financial variables that have been found to correlate with the risk of future busts. We define an equity bust as a year-to-year decline in the quarterly average of real equity prices of at least 20%, and a housing bust as a decline of at least 5%. If the condition for an equity or housing bust is met in quarter t, we date the crisis as having started in quarter t-3. A recessionary bust is defined as a bust that involves a year-to-year decline in real GDP either in the same quarter or up to four quarters later. A deeply recessionary bust additionally requires that the year-to-year decline in real GDP exceed 2%. Our empirical analysis then tries to identify economic and financial variables that predict–or generate and "alarm"–for a bust 5-9 quarters later.

 

 

Exhibit 1 shows our estimation results. In order to facilitate interpretation, all coefficients are expressed in terms of the impact of a 1-standard-deviation increase in an explanatory variable on the probability of a bust, relative to a starting point at which the probability is at its average level. The size of a coefficient is therefore a reasonable proxy for its economic significance in predicting busts, while the z-statistic (in brackets) is a measure of the statistical significance.

 

Exhibit 1 shows that the single most important predictor is past equity price appreciation, followed by a rising investment/GDP ratio and high equity volatility. Our interpretation is that many equity busts are simply the counterpart of prior periods of strong price appreciation, and in this context it is not surprising that big moves downward are more likely when volatility is high. The sizable effect of a rising investment/GDP ratio may reflect a negative impact from excessive capital spending on corporate profitability or the broader dangers posed by an unsustainable homebuilding boom.

*  *  *

Jan Hatzius is careful end with somewhat of a silver lining though…

The expansion has already lasted longer than the median expansion historically, but we still seem to be quite far from the overheating or financial imbalances that historically precede most US recessions.

 

Thus, we expect the current expansion to last longer than average and view the risk of recession over the next few years as fairly modest.

*  *  *
So the model says "worry" but Goldman "thinks" everything's fine.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vFqXpt Tyler Durden

Desperate Pols and Pundits Play the Election 2014 Race Card

Last night on
The Independents
, the co-hosts had the kind of discussion
about race and Election 2014 that you just won’t see anywhere else
on cable news. Includes bashing of Ben Stein, Woodrow Wilson, and
Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-Lousiana), among others:

Tonight there will be no Independents, as Scott
Shackford
mentioned earlier
, though you can see Kennedy in the same time
slot being called upon during election coverage from Fox Business
host Neil Cavuto.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/13FbqPO
via IFTTT