About Those Eyeball-Based Valuations: “Half Of Twitter Accounts Created In 2013 Have Already Been Deleted”

Still paying a #Div/0 valuation for Facebook or Twitter based on expectations of exponential growth in eyeballs, or rather “eyeballs“? Then perhaps read this first.

… many of the “users” on social media sites aren’t real people at all – they’re celebrity staff tweeting on behalf of their employer, or PRs promoting a company, or even fake accounts for people that don’t exist at all. In fact, half of all Twitter accounts created in 2013 have already been deleted.

 

These fake accounts are often created by unscrupulous firms that will beef up your follower count in return for cold hard cash.

 

“Twitter is in the centre of public interest and politicians or companies are often ranked by number of followers or re-tweets or the like – so, there is a whole “web optimisation” industry offering services to make you look better on Twitter – everybody can buy 10,000 followers for $5,” Pfeffer said.

Source: Forbes




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1vVxtyp Tyler Durden

This Sunday may mark the end of Western monetary dominance

Dollar Washington Tears This Sunday may mark the end of Western monetary dominance

November 28, 2014
Santiago, Chile

Walking down the streets of Constantinople in the early Middle Ages, you would have immediately felt the energy and prosperity.

Constantinople was one of the wealthiest, most advanced cities in the world, and some historians estimate its population could have been as high as 500,000 people.

Byzantine architecture in Constantinople was world famous, and local artists were producing mosaics that are still regarded as some of the finest ever made.

At this point in history, wealth and power in the world was clearly concentrated in the East.

Europe was nothing more than a plague-infested backwater. Constantinople flourished. And even further to the east, China was sporting some of the most advanced technology in the world.

But times changed.

By the 13th century, the Byzantine Empire was in clear decline. Its borders were shrinking and the empire was at the center of almost constant warfare.

And more importantly, they had begun to debase their currency. Again.

For centuries, the Byzantine gold solidus had acted as sort of de-facto international reserve currency. It contained roughly 4.5 grams of pure gold and was used in trade and commerce around the world for nearly seven centuries.

(Modern archaeologists have unearthed medieval gold solidus coins as far east as Inner Mongolia!)

Problem is– war is terribly expensive. And they paid for it by debasing by their currency. By the 11th century, the gold content in the solidus had been debased to the point that it was no longer worth anything.

So they gave it another try. Fool me once. Shame on you.

The successor to the solidus was called the hyperon; it was initially struck at 20.5 carats of gold (roughly 85% purity). But this was quickly reduced to 18 carats, then 15, then 12.

Fool me twice. Shame on me.

Enough was enough, and the rising powers in Europe demanded an alternative.

It was the Italians (the most advanced power in Europe at the time) who solved the problem.

Florence, Genoa, and Venice were all minting their own gold coins by the 13th century, and the 3.5g Florentine florin soon became the new international reserve standard used across Europe.

In many ways, this marks the beginning of the West’s rise to dominance: it all started with declaring their monetary independence from a declining power and a currency they could no longer trust.

Fast forward several centuries and we can see that the tables have clearly turned.

The West has been the dominant superpower for centuries. Yet like the Byzantines before, the West is in obvious decline.

At this point insurmountable debts and deficits plague nearly all Western governments. And they make up the difference by debasing their currencies.

This has created massive distrust, especially in the world’s most dominant reserve currency today, the US dollar.

Like the Venetians and Florentines before them, rising powers in Asia are starting to take matters into their own hands.

The Chinese renminbi (though surely not a one-way bet) is rising in international prominence. And China is at the center of a new emerging global financial system being set up in partnership with Russia, India, Brazil, etc.

Western dominance was born from a distrust in the dominant reserve currency at the time. Its decline will be because they followed the same route.

And the canary in the coal mine is what’s happening in Switzerland this weekend.

On Sunday, the people of Switzerland are going to the polls to vote on a return to the gold standard.

It was only 14 years ago that the Swiss franc, traditionally seen as a safe haven currency due to Switzerland’s reputation for stability, was still on a gold standard.

In fact, of all the major currencies, the Swiss franc was the last to abandon prudent monetary standards.

Ever since then, the Swiss National Bank’s balance sheet has absolutely exploded.

Now there’s a national election to return to a gold standard and conservative monetary policy.

Right now the polls suggest that the Swiss are leaning towards ‘NO’, i.e. they want to continue to abandon prudent practices and hand over total control of the money supply to unelected central bankers.

And if the country that has the world’s strongest traditions for financial stability chooses to turn its back on sound money, what hope is there for the rest of the West?

If the Swiss vote NO this weekend, I view that as a major watershed moment in signaling the beginning of the end of Western monetary dominance.

We can already see the signs everywhere.

Across Europe, government bond yields are NEGATIVE, i.e. you have to PAY these bankrupt governments for the privilege of loaning them money.

And as IMF director Christine Lagarde said last week that a diet of high debt, low growth and high unemployment may yet become “the new normal in Europe”.

Each of these data points signals an obvious long-term trend. We can see where this is going.

But here’s the good news: none of this need affect you. The power is in your hands.

Even if the Swiss divorce themselves from prudent policy, and even if your government refuses to maintain sound money, you still have options.

You can choose to maintain a portion of your savings at a well-capitalized bank abroad in stronger currencies.

You can choose to hold some physical precious metals (or even cryptocurrency) overseas at a secure location where it can’t be confiscated by a bankrupt government.

You can choose to own productive assets abroad or collectibles that cannot be conjured out of thin air by central bankers.

All of these tools and resources already exist today. And for now, they’re available for anyone to take advantage of.

from SOVEREIGN MAN http://ift.tt/1ty7aXJ
via IFTTT

Can QE Prop Up Asset Prices Forever?

Submitted by Chris Hunter via Acting man blog,

Popular Myths and a Shrinking Work Force

It’s not just voters who buy into popular myths. Many investors do too. Few have wider appeal than the myth that central banks can create economic growth via the printing press.

What central bankers and their supporters seem to forget is that growth comes from living, breathing human beings.

It often sounds a lot more complicated than it really is. But genuine economic growth comes from two things: the number of workers in the labor force and the productivity of those workers.

 

1124-MI-blog

 

That’s a problem for the US. Because according to a recent report in The Economist, its potential labor force is set to grow at less than one-third the 0.9% rate we saw between 2003 and 2013.

Making things worse, many of America’s boomers – the first of whom qualified for Social Security in 2008 – are opting out of the labor force. Instead of looking for jobs, they are choosing to live on benefits.

This helps explain why the percentage of working-age adults looking for jobs in the US has fallen to below 63% from about 66% when the global financial crisis struck.

And it’s not just Americans who are getting older on average.

From The Economist:

“[T]he ratio of workers to retirees is now plunging in most developed countries and soon will in many emerging markets. Japan is already liquidating the foreign assets its people acquired during their high-saving years; China and South Korea are starting to do so and Germany will soon.”

Fewer workers in the labor force. More retirees to support for those with jobs. Foreign retirees cashing out of their US stocks and bonds. Janet Yellen et al. better hope investors are gullible enough to believe the magic of QE can continue to levitate financial assets forever.

Otherwise, stock and bond investors will start to reconsider the prices they’re willing to pay to own their pieces of paper.

workers per retiree

Past and projected workers per retiree of selected countries – via macrobusiness.com.au.

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/12aR7s4 Tyler Durden

Netherlands, Germany Have Euro Disaster Plan – Possible Return to Guilder and Mark

Netherlands, Germany Have Euro Disaster Plan – Possible Return to Guilder and Mark

The Dutch and German governments were preparing emergency plans for a return to their national currencies at the height of the euro crisis it has emerged. These plans remain in place.


German Gold Deutsche Mark – (Special Edition)

The Dutch finance ministry prepared for a scenario in which the Netherlands could return to its former currency – the guilder. They hosted meetings with a team of legal, economic and foreign affairs experts to discuss the possibility of returning to the Dutch guilder in early 2012. 

The Dutch finance minister during the period has confirmed that Germany also discussed such scenarios.

At the time the Euro was in crisis, Greece was on the verge of leaving or being pushed out of the Euro and the debt crisis was hitting Spain and Italy hard. The Greek prime minister Georgios Papandreou and his Italian counterpart Silvio Berlusconi had resigned and there were concerns that the eurozone debt crisis was spinning out of control – leading to contagion and the risk of a systemic collapse.

A TV documentary broke the story last Tuesday. The rumours were confirmed on Thursday by the current Dutch minister of finance, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, and the current President of the Eurogroup of finance ministers in a television interview which was covered by EU Observer and Bloomberg.

“It is true that [the ministry of] finance and the then government had also prepared themselves for the worst scenario”, said Dijsselbloem.

“Government leaders, including the Dutch government, have always said: we want to keep that eurozone together. But [the Dutch government] also looked at: what if that fails. And it prepared for that.”

While Dijsselbloem said there was no need to be “secretive” about the plans now, such discussions were shrouded in secrecy at the time to avoid spreading panic on the financial markets.

When asked about Germany, Dijsselbloem said he couldn’t say whether that country’s government had made similar preparations.

German Silver Deutsche Mark – (1951-1974)

However, Jan Kees de Jager, finance minister from February 2010 to November 2012, acknowledged that a team of legal experts, economists and foreign affairs specialists often met at his ministry on Fridays to discuss possible scenarios.

“The fact that in Europe multiple scenarios were discussed was something some countries found rather scary. They did not do that at all, strikingly enough”, said De Jager in the TV documentary.

“We were one of the few countries, together with Germany. We even had a team together that discussed scenarios, Germany-Netherlands.”

When the EU Observer requested confirmation from Germany, the German ministry of finance did not officially deny that it had drawn up similar plans, stating simply:
“We and our partners in the euro zone, including the Netherlands, were and still are determined to do everything possible to prevent a breakup of the eurozone.” 

This is quite a revelation. At that time the German finance minister Wolfgang Schauble had said that the Euro could survive without Greece. Whether it could survive without the Dutch is another matter entirely.

A Euro without Holland and especially Germany is currently inconceivable. De Jager also states that other countries found the prospect of a Euro break-up frightening. 
So much so that they buried their heads in the sand rather than deal with the situation facing them. It appears that no emergency contingency plans were made in the unfortunately named PIIGS nations – Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain.

One has to wonder if the plans would have been made public had a TV documentary not forced the Dutch government to confirm the claim.

It is interesting to note that it is these two countries, Germany and Netherlands, whose citizens have also been at the forefront of the gold repatriation movement currently sweeping across Europe – France’s second largest party entered the fray this week.

In a climate with a lack of faith in fiat currencies, any return to a purely fiat guilder or mark would be risky in the absence of the confidence that gold backing provides.
Despite the implication that secrecy is no longer necessary because Europe is over the worst we believe the Dutch repatriation of 20% of it’s sovereign gold from the U.S. indicates that the Dutch are still, wisely, preparing for the worst – whether that be a euro crisis or indeed a dollar crisis and an international monetary crisis.

Their stated reason for returning their 122 tonnes of gold to Netherland’s soil was to instil public confidence in the Dutch central bank.

The prospect of a Euro-break up is a frightening one. It would appear that most Eurozone nations are ill-prepared and indeed unprepared for. 

As always we recommend investors act as their own central bank by taking delivery of bullion or keeping gold and silver in secure, allocated and segregated vaults in safer jurisdictions such as Switzerland and Singapore.

For investors and savers currently using the euro, it begs the important question do you have a euro failure contingency plan? 

Indeed, for investors and savers internationally using other fiat currencies, it begs the important question do you have a currency failure contingency plan? 

While the risks in peripheral European nations of reversion to their national currencies and currency devaluations have diminished – some risks still remain.

The risk is that individual national governments may elect to take this route rather than suffer deflationary economic collapse and Depressions. Alternatively, it could happen through contagion or a systemic event like the collapse of a large European bank, a la Lehman Brothers, that leads to a domino effect jettisoning a member state out of the monetary union.

It could also come about should the German people and politicians decide that the European monetary project is not worth saving or they decide that it cannot be saved and elect to return to the Deutsche mark.
All significantly indebted nations, so called PIIGS and non PIIGS such as Japan, the UK and the U.S. are at risk of currency devaluations.

Competitive currency devaluations or the debasement of currencies for competitive advantage and currency wars poses real risks to the long term stability and prosperity of all democracies in the world and to the finances and savings of people in all countries.

Get Breaking News and Updates On Gold Markets Here

www.GoldCore.com




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/12aR7bE GoldCore

Copper & Crude Crash To 4 Year Lows

With all eyes focused on the malls around America, we thought a glimpse at two of the most important commodities to the world economy would provide food for thought…

 

Copper…

 

And Crude…

 

are at 4-year lows…

But you can still get a bargain stock at record highs…

 

 




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1FAUMhS Tyler Durden

As It Turns Out Deflation Is Good After All

Earlier today, in typical German fashion, the chief of the Bundesbank poured cold water on Europe’s latest round of demands that Germany carry the weight of the rebound from the triple-dip on its shoulders, as usual, when Buba President Jens Weidmann Friday rejected calls for a German stimulus plan, saying only structural reforms and more competitiveness would kick-start eurozone economies. “Calls for a public fiscal stimulus plan in Germany to boost the Eurozone economy are amiss,” said Mr. Weidmann in a speech for an economic summit hosted by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. He is, of course, right: the longer Europe’s insolvent, uncompetitive governments kick the can and force Germany to do all the hard work, the longer Europe will be unable to get out of a hole that gets deeper with every passing day. In short: Mr. Weidmann refuses to “get to work” for a bunch of corrupt, clueless politicians.

He then proceeded to do something shocking: he was logical. Quoted by the WSJ, he said: “Investment rates that are above the growth potential of a developed economy aren’t likely to boost prosperity—this applies to both public and private investments.”

More:

The German government shares Mr. Weidmann’s view. It says public investment can’t solve the eurozone’s growth problem as structural reforms are needed. The International Monetary Fund and neighboring countries France and Italy have called on Germany to boost public investment. But Berlin has pledged only €10 billion ($12.5 billion) in additional public investment over three years starting in 2016, hoping this would spur private investment worth €50 billion.

 

Mr. Weidmann stressed that it is also wrong to believe central bank monetary policy would be able to solve the bloc’s economic problems.

 

“It is an illusion to believe that monetary policy means can raise economies’ growth potential permanently, or create lasting jobs,” Mr. Weidmann said. “In the end, this can only be achieved by structural reforms, because growth and employment occur in innovative companies and competitive products, and well-educated and highly motivated employees.”

Therein lies the rub: Europe is allergic to structural reforms, and as we have shown in the past, it blames its woeful fate on evil, evil “austerity” (somewhat paradoxical for a continent where record debt gets recorder with every passing quarter), when in reality what is causing the ongoing European depression is crime, corruption, cronyism and capital misallocation.

But none of that is news. What was news, and what was truly notable in Weidmann’s statement is his open jab at the stupidity of Keynesian economics itself. To wit from Bloomberg: ECB Governing Council member Jens Weidmann says at event in Berlin that consumer prices in euro area “are strongly influenced by the energy prices, which are at the moment experiencing a positive supply shock.”

The punchline:  “There’s a stimulant effect coming from the energy prices – it’s like a mini stimulus package.”

But wait a minute, isn’t deflation under Keynesian voodoonomics, the biggest bogeyman imaginable?

It turns out deflation is only bad when it impacts… the S&P 500. Otherwise deflation for such things as energy prices and other input costs is suddenly bullish? So, by that logic, Japan with its soaring energy costs as a result of its currency devastation must be smack in the middle of the biggest depression ever. Which, of course, it is, as we warned would happen in early 2013.

For now, however, we are more focused on the official transformation of the German Central Bank into the central bank of “Austrian” economics.




via Zero Hedge http://ift.tt/1FB9xPT Tyler Durden

If the Grand Jurors Had Indicted Darren Wilson, Would Prosecutors Have Been Obligated to Ignore Them?

The other day I
argued
that the grand jurors who rejected criminal charges
against Darren Wilson in the death of Michael Brown misconstrued
their task. They were not supposed to decide whether Wilson should
be convicted; they were supposed to decide whether there was
probable cause to believe he broke the law. Sheila Whirley, one of
the assistant county prosecutors guiding the process,
put it this way
on November 21:

Your standard of proof is still probable cause. You’re not here
to determine guilt or not guilty. It is probable cause: Is it
enough to go to trial?

Whirley’s colleague Kathi Alizadeh elaborated on this point:

You must find probable cause to believe that [Wilson] committed
the offense that you’re considering, and you must find probable
cause to believe that he did not act in lawful self-defense [and]
that he did not use lawful force in making the arrest.

With several eyewitnesses testifying that Brown did not pose a
threat and appeared to be surrendering when Wilson shot him to
death in the street, it seems to me there is enough evidence for
probable cause on all these points, although that does not
necessarily mean there is enough evidence to prove Wilson’s guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt. The latter judgment is reserved for a
trial jury.

If the extensive testimony the grand jurors heard had been
presented in a trial, advocates on both sides would have had an
opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses, which might have given
us a clearer idea of what actually happened. I am still
skeptical
that the state would be able to meet its burden of
proof, but that does not mean it should not have tried.

St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch clearly
did not want to prosecute Wilson, but neither did he want to take
responsibility for that decision. So instead he left it to the
grand jurors, guiding them toward the correct conclusion by
reinforcing Wilson’s self-defense claim. Powerline blogger
Paul Mirengoff, who defends McCulloch’s approach,
describes
it this way:

Normally, prosecutors try to guide a grand jury towards an
indictment. Almost invariably, prosecutors succeed. Hence the
cliche that a prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham
sandwich.

In this case, though, the prosecutor did not get an indictment.
Nor, from all that appears, did he attempt to get one. If anything,
he may have steered the grand jury away from indicting
Wilson….

Prosecutors push through indictments when they believe a party
has committed a crime and that they have a decent shot of proving
so in court. If they believe a party is innocent of criminal
wrongdoing and/or that they will lose at trial, prosecutors
typically don’t initiate criminal proceedings before a grand jury.
Why would they?

In Wilson’s case, the prosecutor obviously believed that Wilson
should not be prosecuted. Normally, then, he would not have
initiated criminal proceedings at all or, at most, he would have
held a perfunctory hearing that resulted in no indictment.

Instead, the prosecutor held an elaborate grand jury
proceeding.

The problem is that, as Georgetown law professor Randy Barnett
noted
on Twitter in response to my blog post, “Prosecutors have an
ethical obligation not to prosecute those they think are innocent.”
If McCulloch believed Wilson was innocent, why would he let the
grand jurors decide whether charges should be brought? And if they
did approve charges, wouldn’t he be ethically obligated to
disregard their determination?

“Whatever [your] decision is, it will be the correct decision
and we will stand by that 100 percent,” Alizadeh told the grand
jurors. “Our opinions don’t matter. It is up to you and what you
guys think.” Yet this seems like a situation where only one outcome
was acceptable, which renders the whole process suspect.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1FATSSP
via IFTTT

How to profit from a decline in the renminbi

shutterstock 154194383 How to profit from a decline in the renminbi

November 28, 2014
Bali, Indonesia

[Editor’s Note: This missive was penned by Sovereign Man’s Chief Investment Strategist Tim Staermose]

I spent two days in China earlier this week. Among other things, I wanted to get a feel for where people on the ground see the currency heading.

My personal view is that, as the US dollar keeps strengthening against the euro, yen, etc. China will find it increasingly difficult to bear the burden of having the only major alternative currency that’s appreciating versus the US dollar.

It’s killing China’s price competitiveness in export markets and contributing to the slowdown in the Chinese economy.

At some point, I believe the pain will become too much to bear, and the Chinese government will devalue. Remember, their hold on power depends almost entirely on keeping people working, and increasing living standards in China.

Indeed, after a surprise interest rate cut by the Chinese authorities last Friday afternoon, word on the street was that the Chinese government may be trying to encourage a weaker RMB.

Speaking with one Zhuhai-based friend who’s in the shoe export business, he confirmed that many Chinese manufacturers are currently surviving as best they can on wafer-thin profit margins.

Personally he was keeping his fingers crossed that the line of $19.95-a-pair high heeled winter boots for women that he had supplied to US retailers for the Black Friday retail sales were going to fly off the shelves.

Talking to the black market foreign exchange dealers near the border crossing from Shenzhen to Hong Kong, the consensus was also that the RMB may have seen its highs in the near term.

If you ask me, it makes perfect sense for the Chinese to let the currency depreciate. By doing so:

  1. They’d boost the export price competitiveness of Chinese exports, especially in Europe and Japan where the local currencies have fallen off a cliff. But, also in the US.
  2. The value of the Chinese government’s vast hoard of foreign exchange reserves would appreciate measurably in RMB terms, giving them more fire power to launch further economic stimulus.
  3. They’d smoke the “carry trade” speculators currently pouring hot money into China — often using illegal workarounds — to benefit from the interest rate spreads available between Chinese yuan deposits or bonds, and near-free US dollar, Hong Kong dollar, or yen funding costs.

However, the consensus view among most non-Chinese investors still appears to be that the RMB is a sure thing to keep gradually appreciating.

This bias is so heavy that a unique contrarian opportunity has presented itself.

Because the USDRMB exchange rate has been trending down in a steady, predictable, un-volatile pattern for most of the year, many people have been lulled into a false sense of security.

With such limited volatility, options prices for trades which short the renminbi are super cheap.

I’ve just put a trade on for an investment management client, using call options on the USDCNY exchange rate.

We are risking RMB70,000 for a chance to make RMB2.5 million or more, on a 20% +/- depreciation in the RMB sometime over the next 12 months.

It’s an aggressive trade. But with 3,400%+ profit potential, we like the risk/reward ratio.

Even if speculating is not your thing, if you currently hold any RMB-denominated deposits or investments, at the very least I recommend you buy some “insurance” against a sudden RMB devaluation.

This is something that is entirely possible within the next 12 months.

From China’s point of view, joining the currency war that’s raging around the world, to stem the pain from a strong currency that’s choking off its competiveness, and stoking unwanted hot money inflows, might just be a temptation that’s too great to resist.

from SOVEREIGN MAN http://ift.tt/1AZ8bRk
via IFTTT

Pakistani Actress Veena Malik Sentenced to 26 Years in Prison for “Malicious Acts of Blasphemy”

Veena MalikActress Veena Malik was
sentenced
this week to 26 years in prison by a Pakistani court
for reenacting her wedding with her husband on a morning TV show.
Her husband, Asad Khattak, as well as Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman, the
owner of Geo TV, which aired the program, and Shaista Whidi, who
hosted it, all received 26 year sentences as well.

The program caused controversy when it first aired several
months ago,
leading
the TV station to run apologies in Pakistani
newspapers. The court primarily objected to the use of religious
music in the mock wedding. “The malicious acts of the proclaimed
offenders ignited the sentiments of all the Muslims of the country
and hurt the feelings, which cannot be taken lightly and there is
need to strictly curb such tendency,” the court ruling said.

Malik does not currently reside in Pakistan and neither,
reportedly, do the other three people given sentences. The actress
says she will return to Pakistan next month to appeal the sentence
and that she has faith in the Pakistani court system.

Watch the allegedly blasphemous TV segment below:

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1ykC5vJ
via IFTTT