Hillary Will Be The Least Of Your Worries – America Has Economic Diarrhea

Submitted by Eugen von Bohm-Bawerk via Bawerk.net,

According to the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the official recession arbiter, the US economy is currently at its fourth longest expansion in history. By the sheer nature of a capitalistic society with its inherent cyclicality it is a safe bet that a new economic recession will hit in the not too distant future. We have argued since June last year that the next recession is imminent and we now feel increasingly confident that our prediction will come true before November’s Presidential Election. Even mainstream forecasters seem to jump on the increasingly likely recession-bandwagon.

 Economic Expansions and Depressions since 1900Since recessions are measured by the change in a highly flawed GDP concept, where money outlays on final consumption account for about two thirds of overall flow it is natural to start our analysis with retail spending. According to latest Census Bureau data total retail sales fell 0.2 per cent in March following a slight contraction in both February and January. In other words, retail sales fell over the entire first quarter as once surging motor vehicle sales (on back of lowered credit standards) reached its apex in Q4’2015.

Total Retail Sales - March

Issuance of auto loans have been running at an annualized rate of USD80bn pushing up the share of auto loans to disposable income. Debt funded consumption is not a viable long term growth strategy and as usual the American economy pulled future demand into the present by issuing ever more lax car loans. We have seen the story before and we know how it ends. 

Auto Loans

As the consumer reaches a breaking point in terms of how much new credit that can be piled on top of legacy debt, even at rock bottom interest rates (NIRP anyone?), inventories of cars are growing faster than sales and auto assemblies seem to have peaked for now. At 12 million units annual rate we are certain there is not much growth potential going forward

Auto Assemblies

Looking at retail sales over a longer horizon we find that every time the yearly rate of growth fell below three per cent the US economy went into recession.

 Retail Sales since 1968 w recession threshold

Inventory to sales are obviously moving higher. However, due to increased efficiency enabled by more sophisticated computers and software the ratio has been structurally trending down for decades. In other words, we need to look at the difference from trend to get a complete understanding of current retail sales to retail inventories; levels are now on par with the worst of the GFC.

Retail to Sales - trend

Wholesale sales are in even worse shape with inventories still growing on a year on year basis while sales have contracted for the last 14 months. The inventory to sales ratio need to trend adjustment to show what is glaringly obvious to us all – the US wholesale industry is in recession!

Wholesale sales, inventory and ratio

Total business sales have rolled over, falling for the last seven months and thus substantiate our argument of a materially weaker US economy.

Total Bus Sales

Moving into industrial production we find further evidence of a weak economy. Industrial production has been falling on a year-on-year basis for eight months now, and it is not just due the oil sector, but far more broad based.

IP by category

It is interesting to note that the US economy has never experienced more than eight months of month on month contractions over the last 12 months without entering a recession. That level has been breached a long time ago.

IP Cumulative - recession signal

Factory orders, a leading indicator for industrial production suggest industrial production will remain weak for the foreseeable future. Factory New Orders

 

Exports and imports are both falling on a year on year basis. While this time series is more volatile (value based) we know that the US economy has never experienced the current level of export contraction without being in a recession. Some would counter that this is mainly due to lower prices on refined oil products, which the US has become a net exporter in, but adjusted for this exports are actually contracting even more.

US export and imports

With falling sales, exports and imports, rising inventories and lower output it is no coincidence that corporate profits are falling. Historically falling profits are one of the best recession indicators we have with only one false signal since the 1950s. In the fourth quarter of last year non-financial profits were down more than 14 per cent on the previous year, the second consecutive quarter of falling profits.

Corporate Profits

 

Per the above argument it’s safe to say large parts of the US economy is already in a recession, but one last piece of the puzzle remains to be solved. How come the labour market performs so well despite all the gloom and doom we witness in the overall economy? According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) the US economy created 2.8 million jobs over the last 12 months; that is almost on par with the booming economy of the 1990s. Despite this, we do not see pressure on employees to work more hours, nor do we see employers bidding up wages. Something does not add up. Some could even say BLS is actually just BS

First of all, note that the establishment survey is model based and hence lagging in nature. You will never spot a trend break in real time by looking at the monthly BLS numbers. We looked at the unrevised payroll data going into previous recessions and we find that original data are always revised down after the recession fact. As the recessions gain momentum the trend becomes negative and subsequent revisions out of the recessions tend to be upwards, as we would expect from a lagging indicator.

In other words, if the US is in fact slowing down and heading into a recession it is highly likely that the current strong payroll data will be revised down.

NFP Revisions 2007 & 2000NFP Revisions 1990 & 1981NFP Revisions 1980 & 1973NFP Revisions 1969 & 1960

 

Secondly, the BLS added on average more than 70k jobs per month over the last 12 months from its so-called Birth/Death adjustments. These are fictional jobs based on the assumption that businesses are created every month and thus employs people that are not captured in the BLS estimates. As always, these adjustments are based on historical data. However, as the chart below shows, new business entries have been declining since the late 1970s while business exits have remained stable. After the crisis more businesses exited than entered rendering the BLS birth/death adjustments useless. In 2013, the latest year with data, business entry and exit rates were more or less identical. Over the last 12 months the US economy added almost 900k fewer jobs than the official estimate if we disregard birth/death adjustments.

Firm Entry and Exit Rates

 

US retail sector added almost 400k jobs last 12 months, which is strange given the fact that retail sales performed poorly throughout the year.

Retail Payroll vs Sales

 

We have also seen a decoupling of paid in withholding taxes on income and employment versus annual payroll growth. Lower growth rates in real withholding taxes suggest 1) Americans are hired in either part-time and/or lower paid jobs (which we know is true) or 2) the current pace of employment growth is not reflecting the real state of the labour market. The truth is probably somewhere in between the two.

With Tax vs NFP

As companies and household are under increasing stress a feedback loop starts to emerge in financial markets. Financial stress indicators, such as the one provided by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, are at high and rising levels.

Cleveland Fed Stress Indexd

Later today (April 28 2016) the Bureau of Economic Analysis will release their advance estimate of first quarter GDP. Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta and New York have released their “nowcast” and both point to somewhere between 0.5 and 1 per cent annual rate. However, that could easily be tilted, in both directions, by changes in bloated inventory levels. As our cumulative inventory / sales chart show the absolute difference between sales and inventories have never been larger, even beating the level prior to the GFC. Remember, these things always take the escalator up and elevator down. When inventory liquidation starts in earnest we will see materially lower growth and then suddenly contraction.

GDP with cumulative inventory

To conclude our very chart heavy update we would like to point our readers to the time series that will eventually make the most bullish sell-side analyst throw in the towel; weekly initial jobless claims.

Initial Jobless Claims

When this series break trend and move higher we know with full certainty the US is in a full blown recession.

via http://ift.tt/1WtxMep Tyler Durden

Amazon Soars After Smashing Expectations On Surge In Cloud Profits

Amazon has done it again. Moments ago Jeff Bezos’ company reported Q1 earnings that blew away expectations, when it printed revenues of $29.13 billion, well above the expected $28 billion, generating EPS of $1.07 almost double the expected $0.57.

However, it is what drove this surge in profitability because while AMZN reported a respectable jump in its North American retail operating incomem which rose from $254MM a year ago to $588MM in the current quarter, or a 3.4% profit margin, it was Amazon’s cloud service, the AWS that was the standout with a whopping 604MM in profit, a massive 23.5% margin on $2.37 billion in AWS sales, which also beat expectations. The AWS profit was also higher than the profit reported by any other part of the company.

This is what Jeff Bezos said about the quarter:

“Amazon devices are the top selling products on Amazon, and customers purchased more than twice as many Fire tablets than first quarter last year,” said Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon.com. “Earlier this week, the $39 Fire TV Stick became the first product ever — from any manufacturer — to pass 100,000 customer reviews, including over 62,000 5 star reviews, also more than any other product ever sold on Amazon. Echo too is off to an incredible start, and we can’t yet manage to keep it in stock despite all efforts. We’re building premium products at non-premium prices, and we’re thrilled so many customers are responding to our approach.”

Amazon also laid out the following guidance:

  • Net sales are expected to be between $28.0 billion and $30.5 billion, or to grow between 21% and 32% compared with second quarter 2015. Wall Street expected $28.3 billion
  • Operating income is expected to be between $375 million and $975 million, compared with $464 million in second quarter 2015.

Overall sales growth also picked up to 29% from 26% last quarter as the company boosted its total headcount to a record 245,200 (mostly part-time) employees.

 

More importantly, consolidated operating margin has now certainly turned the corner, rising from 3.1% to 3.7% courtesy of AWS, the highest margin since 2010.

 

Finally, amazon’s Free Cash Flow, long time a big concern to shareholders, is soaring and in the current quarter Amazon reported $6.4 billion in Free Cash Flow.

 

The stock is loving the results, and just like Facebook yesterday, the stock has soared 12% in the after hours and is now at $675 after closing just north of $600.

via http://ift.tt/1WtxOD3 Tyler Durden

Speaker Disinvited from College Event after ‘Disrespecting’ Obama

Boris JohnsonIt is no longer okay for politicians to be disrespectful toward President Obama—if they wish to speak on campuses, that is. 

Students at King’s College in London no-platformed Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, after he criticized Obama’s decision to remove a bust of former Prime Minister Winston Churchill from the White House. Johnson had been scheduled to participate in a debate on the merits of the European Union, according to The Telegraph. 

Johnson accused Obama of having an “ancestral dislike of the British Empire” because of his Kenyan heritage. The event’s organizers deemed Johnson’s remarks unacceptable. 

“Given your inappropriate comments and inferences towards President Obama’s Kenyan heritage, of which he is rightly proud, and your general tone of disrespect over the past few days in relation to the President of the United States of America, we are now formally withdrawing your invitation at Kings College London,” wrote the students. 

Students are under no obligation to give a platform to Johnson, of course. But it seems absurd to punish one politician for harshly criticizing another. If Johnson is wrong, why not bring him to campus so that people can argue against him? 

If British students seem themselves as protectors of President Obama’s feelings, campus radicalism may have entered its most bizarrely reactionary phase yet. 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1qZeba4
via IFTTT

Kamikaze-Kuroda & Carl Icahn Crush Facebook-Driven Stock-Feeding Frenzy

There is only one clip for this…

 

It started in Japan…when Kuroda let the world down… 1500 NKY points down!!

 

And then China stomped on its latest bubble…

 

But then US GDP printed its worst level in 2 years… and stocks took off!! soaring all the way to the edge of Kuorda's Kamikaze moment before Carl Icahn upset everyone…

 

Stops run to Kuroda's cliff and then icah npushed the market over the edge…

 

Of course, Nasdaq was outperforming thanks to Facebook out of the gate but once the selling started everything collapsed…

 

Dow futures swung around 1000 points in the last 24 hours…

 

"Most Shorted" stocks plunged…

 

AAPL tanked again after carl Icahn said he was out…

 

VIX was smashed early on in another desperate bid for 2100 in the S&P 50).. but failed… (VIX >15.5 at the close…)

 

Financials began to rollover…

 

Stocks decoupled higher from bonds once again before catching back down…

 

Treasury yields roller-coastered lower…(but notably 2Y and 30Y held as the belly slumped)…

 

Yen's surge weighed on The USD Index – biggest drop in a month – down 4 days in a row…

 

 

USD weakness helped most commdoties (but industrials fell as China collapsed)

 

WTI Crude is now up 18% off the post-Doha lows – from $39 to $46…

 

Crude's rip leads the way post-Fed, with stocks red…

 

But Gold (and Silver) are the best performers since Kuroda's Kamikaze-move…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

Bonus Chart: Do you feel lucky?

via http://ift.tt/1T8695e Tyler Durden

Earnings “Beats” & The Warning In Today’s GDP Data

Submitted by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Earnings Are Beating Estimates Like Crazy

In a not so surprising outcome, the number of companies beating earnings estimates currently is above the 12-quarter average. Via Zacks Research:

While growth remains problematic, actual results are turning out to be less bad relative to the low levels to which estimates had fallen ahead of this reporting cycle. More companies are coming out with positive surprises for both earnings as well as revenues.”

Zacks-Earnings-Update-042816

“Total earnings for the 209 S&P 500 members that have reported results are down -5.5% from the same period last year on -1.6% lower revenues, with 75.6% beating EPS estimates and 56% coming ahead of top-line expectations.”

So, this is all good news and a reason to buy stocks, right? Not so fast.

The problem, as shown in the chart above, is that the pace of growth in earnings is far weaker than previous averages. Furthermore, while Wall Street will point to the “beat rate” as a reason why the current “bull market” is still intact, it has been a function of excessively low expectations.

The problem is that expectations for the second half of the year are still overly optimistic.

Zacks-Earnings-Update-042816-2

“Many see the Q1 earnings season as the inflection point for corporate earnings, with the growth picture starting to improve from Q2 onwards and turning positive in the back half of the year. The relative more numerous positive surprises and the fewer negative revisions to current-period estimates would support that view.”

For profits to improve to such a degree in the second half of the year, such would suggest a resumption of economic growth both domestically and internationally. However, there is scant evidence currently that such is going to be the case given the ongoing drive to suppress interest rates and flood the financial system with liquidity. 

As shown by the Economic Output Composite Index (EOCI – click here for composition), economic growth is currently at levels more normally associated with recessions. The only previous anomaly was in 2012 as the combination of Central Bank interventions, a Japanese earthquake/tsunami, a warm winter and falling energy prices all collided to drag forward consumption.

(The indicator uses a 6-month average to smooth out the month-to-month volatility caused by seasonal adjustment anomalies as we are currently witnessing.)

EOCI-Index-Indicator-042816

Will the recent exceptionally warm winter, low energy prices, and Central Bank interventions once again be enough to stave off further economic weakness? We will have to wait and see.

Secondly, stock buybacks have been a major support of earnings reports over the last several quarters.

As top line revenue growth has remained mired in a slow growth state, along with the economy, bottom line earnings per share have skyrocketed due to ongoing cost-cutting, wage suppression and share buybacks. Q1 is currently estimated to show the largest differential in Operating EPS, as compared non-buyback adjusted Operating EPS, of $1.08.

Earnings-Buybacks-042816

What is interesting is when we take a look at the estimated Operating EPS for Q1 currently and compare that to the estimates for Q1 of 2016 in January of this year. Currently, Operating EPS for Q1 is expected to be $25.35 when in January it was estimated to be $28.05. If we back out $2.70 over-estimation error, the current beat rate for earnings is actually ZERO.

But, of course, that takes all the fun out of the “beat the earnings estimates” game, doesn’t it?

 

Warning In Today’s GDP

Contributing Editor Michael Lebowitz, via 720 Global Research, penned the following this morning:

“In today’s GDP release the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reported  0.50 % annualized economic growth, a sharp departure from the 1.40% annualized growth of the prior quarter.

Economic growth is now running below a 1.00% annualized rate for the last two-quarters and has been by and large trending lower for the last two years as graphed below.”

720Global-GDP-1

Economists consider this quarter an anomaly as judged by their forecasts for a rebound in the second quarter. The current consensus projection for the second quarter ending June 30, 2016, is 2.50%. Despite a secular trend of slowing domestic economic growth and global economic weakness, few economists are predicting a recession this year. Then again, few have ever correctly forecast a recession.
 
The graph below highlights the slowing secular trend in GDP growth and the series of cycles through which the U.S. economy tends to move. Note that five of the last seven economic cycles have progressively peaked at lower levels. If the current cycle peaked in mid-2015 (labeled “peak?”), a multi-year decline in GDP growth is likely. The average decline in economic growth from peak to trough for the seven cycles has been -4.3%, with -3.0% being the smallest decline. A 3.0% decrease from the current level of 2.3%, implies that the U.S. economy will have a three-year period averaging -0.7% growth.”

720Global-GDP-2

If economists are correct and economic growth in the second quarter remains true to forecasts, the economy will avoid a recession in the first half of the year. That said, we must consider that while economists foresee a pickup in economic activity, relying on their forecasts is dangerous.
 
On February 14, 2016, the Atlanta Federal Reserve was forecasting first-quarter economic growth of 2.7%, and a consensus of economists expected 2.1% growth. Based on today’s GDP data, those forecasts were grossly off the mark, leaving one to question the integrity of second-quarter forecasts.”
Michael is correct. Importantly, however, will be the annual backward revisions to the data which will likely show that 2015 and 2016 economic growth was substantially weaker than current reports currently suggest. This was what was seen when 2012 growth rates were marked sharply downward as well.
Of course, there is one main driver of recessions that we must now review.
 

Recessions Are Driven By The Market

As I penned previously: 

“Recessions don’t cause bear markets, bear markets cause recessions.”

George Soros once discussed the idea of “reflexivity” suggesting that:

Reflexivity sets up a feedback loop between market valuations and the so-called fundamentals which are being valued. The feedback can be either positive or negative. Negative feedback brings market prices and the underlying reality closer together. In other words, negative feedback is self-correcting. It can go on forever, and if the underlying reality remains unchanged, it may eventually lead to an equilibrium in which market prices accurately reflect the fundamentals.

 

By contrast, a positive feedback is self-reinforcing. It cannot go on forever because eventually, market prices would become so far removed from reality that market participants would have to recognize them as unrealistic.When that tipping point is reached, the process becomes self-reinforcing in the opposite direction. That is how financial markets produce boom-bust phenomena or bubbles. Bubbles are not the only manifestations of reflexivity, but they are the most spectacular.”

This idea of reflexivity is important in understanding the relationship between market psychology and the ultimate outcome of the markets themselves. While the vast majority of the media and analysts continue to assert the markets are fine because there is currently “no signs of recession,” it ignores the impact of the psychology of the participants.

Bear markets are a result of the switch of market psychology from “greed” to “fear” driven by an event that leads to a broad market “selling panic” that triggers a negative feedback loop in the market. (reflexivity)

Recessions are coincident with market declines ONLY IN HINDSIGHT. The reason is due to the annual revisions to past economic data that only reveal the start and end of the recession after the fact. (The chart below shows this effect.)

SP500-NBER-RecessionDating-040416

Jeffrey Gundlach, head of Doubleline, recently made the same observation stating:

“We will be on watch for that [a recession] in the coming months. But it doesn’t really matter. Recessions don’t drive financial markets. It’s the other way around. People are so focused on this «recession-yes-or-no-question». What really matters is that we are in a low nominal growth environment and global growth keeps getting marked down. It is going to be slower in 2016 than in 2015.”

Here is the important point.

“In a number of cases over the past century, a bear market in U.S. stocks was well underway long before a recession had taken hold of the U.S. economy. If you are waiting for the confirmation of a recession before taking actions to protect your investment portfolio, it will likely be far too late.”

With valuations pushing extreme levels, economic growth extremely weak and markets now grossly exuberant based solely on “future hopes,” such has been a toxic brew that has left investors wondering what went wrong.

As Gundlach summed up:

“In the financial markets, 80% of the time it’s a coin flip. But the other 20% of the time you have very high confidence and it’s not a coin flip. For instance, I don’t think the stock market is a coin flip. Especially in the United States stocks are very expensive, particularly low volatility stocks.

 

The riskiest things are now stocks and other investments perceived to be safe. One of the most popular categories in US investing are low volatility stock funds. But there is no such thing! If you think that a stock like Johnson & Johnson can’t go down, you’re wrong. And if people own funds that invest in stocks which they think are immune from decline and they start to decline, all hell breaks loose.

Just some things to think about.

 

via http://ift.tt/24nbbTI Tyler Durden

Seattle Citizens’ Trash Now Safe From Unwarranted Government Snooping

BinsA judge has ruled that snooping trash collectors in Seattle cannot simply go through garbage bins without any sort of warrant to determine whether its citizens are putting food in the wrong place. It’s a win for the property-rights-focused lawyers of the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF).

The Foundation brought suit last year on behalf of a Seattle citizen over a law that mandated that no more than 10 percent of a resident’s “regular” trash bin contain food waste. The food was supposed to go into the yard waste bin so that it could be composted.

Rather than simply asking residents to do this, the city decided to make it a law and mandate fines. The fines were minor—$1 per container violation—but nevertheless enforcement required permitting the guys picking up trash to snoop through containers to look for compliance.

The PLF sued to stop the unwarranted searches, and a judge yesterday ruled that they were in the right. While the Supreme Court’s precedents on trash searches have stated citizens don’t have a Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy, Washington State’s constitution has its own privacy protections. It’s under Washington’s rules that PLF won. The PLF notes in a celebratory blog post that “if Seattle wants to rifle through your trash, it’ll now need a warrant.”

But they probably won’t even need to bother searching. One of the sillier parts of this fight was that the mayor, after realizing that the very progressive citizens of Seattle were voluntarily doing as asked, had already suspended the implementation of the fines. The searches and privacy violations weren’t even needed.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1Tz27pM
via IFTTT

Obama Admits Couldn’t “Convince Americans Of ‘Recovery'”, Bashes ‘The Big Short’

Despite his proclamation that he "saved the world from a Great Depression," the fact is that Obama will be the first President ever to not see a single year of 3% GDP growth – but only cynical fiction-peddlers would mention facts at a time like this. In yet more legacy-defending narrative, Obama told The NYTimes today that his biggest failure was being unable to sell his success in putting the American economy back on track to the American people (no matter the actual realities) careful to blame Republicans for slowing growth "by a percentage point or two." And then in a final affront to fact, Obama dismisses the conclusion of "The Big Short" proclaiming that he reined in Wall Street, overhauled the banking system, and made water from wine "the financial system substantially more stable."

With regard his presidential legacy, Obama recently said he was proud of the healthcare reforms, and added that:

"saving the world from a Great Depression – that was quite good."

Defending the sheer arrogance (and ignorance) of such a statement, he added, "I'm proud; I think I've been true to myself during this process." Truth must have a different meaning where he comes from, but of course, anyone doubting the truthiness of such a statement was hacked down to size with the now ubiquitous "Don't give up and succumb to cynics."

And now, as The Independent notes,

The interview, with the paper’s Sunday Magazine, was part an exercise in patting himself on his own back for lifting the US out of the economic morass he inherited from President George W. Bush and part remorse.

 

“I actually compare our economic performance to how, historically, countries that have wrenching financial crises perform,” he said of the early days of his presidency. “By that measure, we probably managed this better than any large economy on Earth in modern history.”

However, in fact, some might way his economic performance was simply the worst…

Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth

 

According to Louis Woodhill, if the economy continues to perform below 2.67% GDP growth rate this year, President Barack Obama will leave office with the fourth worst economic record in US history.

 

Assuming 2.67% RGDP growth for 2016, Obama will leave office having produced an average of 1.55% growth. This would place his presidency fourth from the bottom of the list of 39, above only those of Herbert Hoover (-5.65%), Andrew Johnson (-0.70%) and Theodore Roosevelt (1.41%)

Still, Obama went on with the self-congratulatry tone – this time however admitting that it was all a snow-job…

“I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he told the interviewer, Andrew Ross Sorkin, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

While not quite making excuses, Mr Obama suggests that his failure better to communicate was in part due to being overwhelmed at the time.

We were moving so fast early on that we couldn’t take victory laps. We couldn’t explain everything we were doing. I mean, one day we’re saving the banks; the next day we’re saving the auto industry; the next day we’re trying to see whether we can have some impact on the housing market.”

Saying he was sometimes kept “up at night” because of his failure to do more to fuel the recovery, Mr Obama focused especially on the missed opportunity of “a massive infrastructure project”, noting that 2012-2014, “was the perfect time to do it; low interest rates, construction industry is still on its heels, massive need – the fact that we failed to do that, for example, cost us time…It meant that there were folks who we could have helped and put back to work and entire communities that could have prospered that ended up taking a lot longer to recover.”

Perhaps the following nine charts will provide a little more color as just what "saving the world" looks like for President Obama (red shaded section is his 'reign') and why the American public just would not fall for his now-admitted bullshit…

 

But that's not all, in his New York Times' diatribe, President Obama takes further aim at more fiction-peddlers – those of "The Big Short"…as Bloomberg reports,

Reflecting on his economic legacy, President Barack Obama disputes the conclusion in “The Big Short” movie that nothing changed on Wall Street after the 2008 economic meltdown, and maintains that his policies have helped stabilize the financial sector.

 

…Obama bemoaned his fractious relationship with Wall Street, said finance is absorbing more science and engineering talent than it should, and speculated he might have gone into business if not politics. But he has little patience for criticism from business leaders.

 

“One of the constants that I’ve had to deal with over the last few years is folks on Wall Street complaining, even as the stock market went from in the 6,000s to 16,000 or 17,000,” he said, referring to the rise in the Dow Jones Industrial Average during his administration.

 

“They’d be constantly complaining about our economic policies. That’s not rooted in anything they’re experiencing; it has to do with ideology and their aggravations about higher taxes.”

 

In the Dodd-Frank legislation to overhaul the financial system, Obama sees a major shift in how Wall Street is regulated. He takes issue with Hollywood’s version, reflected in the 2015 film “The Big Short,” which suggested that little has changed on Wall Street. The movie was based on the 2010 best-seller of the same name by Michael Lewis.

 

“There is no doubt that the financial system is substantially more stable,” Obama said, adding, “It is true that we have not dismantled the financial system, and in that sense, Bernie Sanders’s critique is correct.”

Yeah looks like you really showed them!!

 

We leave it to Obama to summarize from last week:

"Reject pessimism, cynicism and know that progress is possible. Progress is not inevitable, it requires struggle, discipline and faith.”

And question nothing, and reject reality in favor of Obama's propaganda, of course… if you had believed him, we would all being do so much better now!!

via http://ift.tt/23az3az Tyler Durden

Focused On The Wrong End Of Oil

Submitted by Jeffrey Snider via Alhambra Investment Partners,

The front end of the oil price complex continues to get all the attention because it seems to further the more optimistic narrative. It is the back end, however, that is most significant. The nearer maturities of the futures curve reflect more the funding environment than the fundamental view of oil and the economy. The lack of continued liquidation has “allowed” investors (and speculators who are no longer, apparently, deserving of mainstream scorn) to bid up the front, but the outer years remain flat and unimpressed.

SABOOK Apr 2016 WTI Curves

The entire curve has moved higher, to be sure, but the $6 or so in 2018 maturities and out isn’t nearly as impressive as the $18 at the front. Viewing the curve as it is now compared to what it was entering the last liquidation wave, however, reveals the changed disposition especially upon more macroeconomic considerations.

SABOOK Apr 2016 WTI Curve In and Out

The steepness is almost gone with the flattening centered around $50. At one time not all that long ago, such a low level was unthinkable. A year ago, the curve was settling more toward $65 to $70. The difference is reality, where the gravity of desperate funding “pulled” on the front end leading in anticipation of what we see now, where the back end followed to confirm the depressing “dollar” instincts. The crude or energy imbalance is widespread now, historic in its level, and, more importantly, continuing to get worse. Thus, the flatter curve at $50 is, in view of the past few months, maybe as optimistic as it can be.

Production levels in the US have started to decline and steadily at that.

SABOOK Apr 2016 WTI Crude Production

No matter the shrinking supply (or even normal seasonal patterns), however, the total inventory of crude oil continues to set new records. Since the end of September 2015, the US EIA reports that total inventory (not including the SPR) has ballooned by a further 86.6 million barrels.

SABOOK Apr 2016 WTI Crude Inventory

Over those 31 weeks, inventories have been drawn down in only five of them, meaning a steady and consistent buildup no matter the usual historic pattern. It hasn’t been just crude oil, either, as gasoline inventories likewise build though more so along with regular seasonality only adjusting upward compared to the past several years.

SABOOK Apr 2016 WTI Gasoline Inventory

Gasoline inventory in the latest week is 7% more than the same week in 2015, and 15% above the same week in 2014.

These are all very pessimistic fundamental balances that negatively reflect on the actual economic circumstances. The flat and low WTI futures curve further confirms that the overall slowdown (since 2012) amplified into steady if so far nominal economic contraction during this period. It has taken a little longer to see it in Apple’s revenue or in FOMC statements, but it has been working and widespread for more than a year and a half already. With curve as it is, there isn’t much expectation for that to change.

via http://ift.tt/1SvRTHL Tyler Durden

Tulsa Deputy Who Fatally Shot Eric Harris Found Guilty, Sentenced to Four Years in Prison

Robert Bates, a Tulsa County reserve deputy who fatally shot Eric Harris and claimed he thought he had reached for his taser, was found guilty of second-degree manslaughter and given the maximum sentence of four years in prison.

The 73-year-old Bates shot Harris after he and other deputies were pursuing Harris over allegedly selling a gun to an undercover cop. Bates was heard saying, “oh, I shot him, I’m sorry” on sunglass cam footage that captured portions of the incident. “Fuck your breath,” one deputy tells Harris after he’s been shot. When he complained that he’d done nothing to deserve to be shot, a deputy told him to shut up. “You fucking ran.” Harris died in the hospital later that day.

Witnesses at the trial testified Bates shot Harris seconds after selling the gun and being brought to the ground and restrained, according to the Tulsa World. Prosecutors also argued Bates showed a lack of “reasonable” care by volunteering for the sting the night before. Other deputies testified they saw Bates sleeping in his car before the operation against Harris, who the deputies testified they told Bates was dangerous and likely armed.

Bates’ attorney told the World that the “massive amount” of negative attention drawn to the case “created a climate in which it was virtually impossible to defend” him, and said they would consider appeals when they “understand more about our options going forward.”

Bates was allegedly given credit by the Tulsa County Sheriff’s Office for field training he didn’t receive, and Sheriff Stanley Glanz resigned in the wake of the growing scandal around the Harris shooting.

Glanz was eventually indicted on two misdemeanors, in relation to repeatedly denying the release of a 2009 internal investigation into Bates, a friend of Glanz’s, as well as using a county-owned and –fueled SUV while taking a $600 a month stipend for using his own car for official business.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1QDpc5Q
via IFTTT

Teen Pregnancy Rate Has Fallen by More Than Half

16andPregnantThe pregnancy rate among American women aged 15 through 19 has fallen by more than half from its peak of 61.8 births per 1,000 teen women in the 1990s to 24.2 in 2014. Still nearly 250,000 babies were born to women in this age group. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes, “This is another historic low, and a drop of 9% from 2013. Birth rates fell 11% for women aged 15–17 years, and 7% for women aged 18–19 years.”

Although births among Hispanic and black teens have dropped by almost half since 2006, the CDC reports that black and Hispanic teens are still about twice as likely to become pregnant than are white teen women. These ethnic differences in pregancy rates are associated with higher rates of youth unemployment and lower educational achievement often found in minority communities. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unwanted Pregnancy calculates that teen childbearing in the United States cost taxpayers (federal, state, and local) at least $9.4 billion annually.

Why are teen women having fewer babies? First, more teens appear to be taking advantage of effective contraceptive methods. Second, they also are having less sex than earlier generations did. In an earlier report on adolescent sex the CDC noted that since 1988 the rate of teen sexual activity had fallen by 22 percent for teen males and 14 percent for teen females. Interestingly, a 2014 study found that births to teens dropped by nearly 6 percent 18 months after the preimiere of the MTV reality show, 16 and Pregnant.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1T7XrnG
via IFTTT