Dallas Fed Tumbles (Again) – 17th Consecutive Month Of Contraction

This is the 17th month in a row of contraction for Dallas Fed’s manufacturing survey as the headline print plunged to -20.8 from -13.9 (missing expectations of a hopeful bounce to -8.0 by 6 standard deviations). Despite the unequivocally good rebound in oil prices, sentiment in Dallas remains dismal with new orders crashing as even ‘hope’ has now given way to realism as the 6-month outlook tumbles back into negative territory.

 

 

This is a 6 standard deviation miss…

 

It appears higher oil prices are not helping…

 

As The Dallas Fed reports,

Texas factory activity declined in May after two months of increases, according to business executives responding to the Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey. The production index, a key measure of state manufacturing conditions, fell from 5.8 to -13.1, hitting its lowest reading in a year.

 

Other measures of current manufacturing activity also reflected contraction this month. The new orders index fell more than 20 points to -14.9 after pushing into positive territory last month. The growth rate of orders index has been negative since late 2014 and fell to -14.7 in May after climbing to near zero in April. The capacity utilization and shipments indexes returned to negative territory after two months of positive readings, coming in at yearlong lows of -11.0 and -11.5, respectively.

 

Perceptions of broader business conditions were more pessimistic this month. The general business activity index declined from -13.9 to -20.8, and the company outlook index fell 10 points to -16.1.

 

Latest readings on employment and workweek length indicated a fifth consecutive month of contraction in May. The employment index moved down three points to -6.7. Sixteen percent of firms noted net hiring, and 22 percent noted net layoffs in May. The hours worked index posted a double-digit decline from its April reading, coming in at -11.8.

Charts: Bloomberg

via http://ift.tt/1Uru17j Tyler Durden

Here’s proof that the US dollar is insanely overvalued

Shocking. Astonishing. Jaw dropping.

There’s just no other way to describe how cheap South Africa is right now.

Between the worldwide decline in commodities prices, and a major crisis of confidence in the national government here, the local currency (South African rand) remains at the lowest level it’s been… ever.

And that’s made nearly EVERYTHING here dirt cheap if you’re spending foreign currency… especially US dollars.

Just doing something simple like eating out at a restaurant or going to the grocery store can be startling.

Once you do the math and convert the prices back to US dollars, it almost seems like you’re missing a zero.

This also carries over into many asset prices, including certain areas in the property market.

Here in Johannesburg, I saw an amazing home for sale in one of the nicest, upscale neighborhoods with an asking price of about $515,000 US dollars.

Now, half a million bucks might not sound terribly cheap– until you find out what you’re getting for the money.

The house is an enormous seven-bedroom compound of nearly 13,000 square feet.

Pool. Courtyard. Fountains. Private chef’s kitchen. Parking for eight. Separate home for live-in staff. Wonderful neighborhood with top schools, shops, and restaurants.

Something like this would go for at least 20 times that price in Los Angeles, and 40 times the price in London.

Much of this price mismatch is due to the currency anomaly– that the South African rand is so undervalued, AND that the US dollar is so overvalued.

Perhaps this is most obvious when looking at the travel package I just bought.

Longtime readers know that I’m a big fan of special “round the world” fares that major airline alliances offer.

I’ve written about this before– all three of the major global airline alliances offer special fares for passengers when you travel completely around the world.

A typical journey might be, for example, Los Angeles to London to Singapore to Sydney and back to Los Angeles again.

That itinerary takes you all the way around the world, and you’ll pay one simple fare that’s usually quite attractive.

Typically the round-the-world fare is calculated based on the country where you depart.

So if your journey starts and stops from London, your fare will be quoted and priced in British pounds.

But if your journey starts and stops in Los Angeles, your fare will be quoted and priced in US dollars.

The strange thing is that when you convert the currencies, the amounts won’t match even though the journey is essentially the same.

In other words, LA-London-Singapore-Sydney-LA costs $11,400, while Sydney-LA-London-Singapore-Sydney costs AUD 13,600, or about $9,875 USD.

That’s more than a $1500 difference.

This doesn’t make any sense since both itineraries are comprised of the exact same flights, i.e. Sydney to LA, LA to London, London to Singapore, Singapore to Sydney.

The flights are simply in a different order. That’s all. The price should be more or less the same.

And yet, due to these major anomalies in the currency markets, there are major differences in the fares.

Here in South Africa, I’ve just booked a business class ticket that goes from Johannesburg to Asia, then the US, Chile, Madrid, London, and back to Johannesburg.

The price I paid was 70,000 South African rand.

But due to the rand being near it’s all-time low, that’s the equivalent of just $4,500.

To put this in perspective, the same itinerary starting and stopping in the US costs about $12,500 in business, and over $6,600 in economy class.

Crazy. I paid 30% less to fly in business class for the exact same flights that someone would pay in US dollars to fly in economy class.

Clearly this makes no sense (but I’m happy to take the deal).

The reason is obvious: the rand is undervalued relative to the US dollar.

Ten years ago it was the opposite: the US dollar was deeply undervalued relative to other currencies.

Oil was expensive, and major commodities exporters from Brazil to Australia, and even here in South Africa, had overvalued currencies.

Now the pendulum has swung in the other direction.

Commodities prices have plunged, and those same exporters are experiencing major economic slowdowns. Their currencies have all been punished.

Undoubtedly the right equilibrium is somewhere in the middle.

But markets rarely find the equilibrium. They almost always overcorrect.

So now the rand has plummeted and become absurdly weak, while it’s the US dollar that has become extremely expensive.

Sure, it’s possible that the dollar becomes even stronger (and the rand weaker).

But these things routinely go in cycles, and there will be a correction. There always is.

So anyone who owns US dollars has an opportunity right now to trade overvalued pieces of paper for undervalued real assets… as long as you look abroad.

Part of being a Sovereign Man is having a global view– expanding one’s thinking to the entire world.

I’ve written before about how our company is acquiring or has already purchased productive farmland in central Chile, deeply undervalued, profitable businesses in Australia, and real estate in Colombia.

These are all REAL assets. And as long as central bankers continue to print paper money without restraint or regard for the consequences, it’s critical to own something real.

Gold and silver are also real assets, and both are historically inexpensive relative to the US dollar.

Bottom line: take advantage of this opportunity to trade your paper for something of value. It won’t last.

from Sovereign Man http://ift.tt/1WuQ9kU
via IFTTT

Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Microsoft Agree to Hate Speech Code of Conduct

Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Microsoft have agreed to the European Union’s Code of Conduct on “illegal hate speech,” designed to ensure “that online platforms do not offer opportunities for illegal online hate speech to spread virally.” The code, while legally non-binding, commits these tech companies to extensive review and remove requirements for any online content reported as hate speech. It stems from the March 24 terrorist attacks in Brussels, after which the E.U. Justice and Home Affairs Council declared that it would work with tech companies “to counter terrorist propaganda” and develop a “code of conduct against hate speech online” by June. 

The document defines hate speech broadly: “all conduct publicly inciting to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin.” Under the code, “online intermediaries and social media platforms” must have in place “clear and effective processes to review notifications regarding illegal hate speech on their services,” review “the majority” of notifications within 24 hours, and remove or disable access to any content determined to be illegal hate speech.

The companies also agree to post community rules or guidelines “clarifying that they prohibit the promotion of incitement to violence and hateful conduct,” have regular powwows with officials and law enforcement in E.U. member states, and report on the impact of their efforts “to the High Level Group on Combating Racism, Xenophobia and all forms of intolerance by the end of 2016.”

Google’s Public Policy and Government Relations Director, Lie Junius, said the company is “pleased to work with the [European Commission] to develop co- and self-regulatory approaches to fighting hate speech online.”

And that is the silver lining here, from a libertarian perspective: at least Facebook, Google, et al. entered into this regulatory scheme semi-voluntarily, although voluntary is always a blurry concept when it comes to agreements with governing bodies. Maybe the whole code is just good PR for these companies, maybe it’s a step toward a social-media-to-police pipeline for all manner of unpopular speech. We’ll see. 

In addition to simply agreeing to remove threatening or violence-inciting speech, the code stipulates that tech companies, “recognizing the value of independent counter speech against hateful rhetoric and prejudice,” will also “aim to continue their work in identifying and promoting independent counter-narratives, new ideas and initiatives and supporting educational programs that encourage critical thinking.” 

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1sYTNHO
via IFTTT

“I’m That Libertarian”: Presidential Candidate Marc Allan Feldman’s Rap at the L.P. Convention

I’ve had people ask about what I referred to in my reporting on the intrigue and politicking between the ballots of the Libertarian Party convention over the weekend as presidential candidate Marc Allan Feldman’s “remarkably impassioned and strangely quite good rap about the other candidates and libertarian activists in general.” 

Here it is:

More reporting from the L.P. Convention floor later today.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/25yrelJ
via IFTTT

Oil Spikes Near $50 On Libya Turmoil Despite Highest OPEC Production Since 2008

In its ubiquitous manner, crude futures decided to try and run the stops at the US equity open but were unable to get to $50 (49.984 in July WTI) before fading back a little. Ths driver – according to the narrative-du-jour – is turmoil in Libya and ongoing Nigeria and France disruptions, which are both offsetting a surge in OPEC production to its highest level since 2008 in the minds of the machines. "The market is pretty much on hold until we get all this information," says Deutsche Bank's Jens Pedersen of the data dump and OPEC meetings this week. "We need to get that out of the way to see if there is a reason for oil to go higher."

OPEC production rose to 32.575m bbl/day – its highest since 2008…

 

And the result – a machine-driven meltup, which however failed to tag $50 stops for now…

 

As Bloomberg reporets, key stories shaping mkt today: Libya guards take control of town linked to 2 oil ports from Islamic State militants. French refinery strikes continue; potential for strike action seen in Norway, Brazil

Libya’s Petroleum Facilities Guard captures town of Bin Jawad after clashes w/ Islamic State: spokesman

  • Bin Jawad is a crossing point to oil ports of Es Sider and Ras Lanuf, which have been closed since Dec. 2014
  • Petroleum Guards seize Nofaliyeh town from IS

French Refinery Strike…

  • Exxon’s Gravenchon, Fos Refineries in France operating normally: spokeswoman
  • Total says 216 French gas stations completely out of stock, another 337 stations partially out of gasoline out of a total of 2,200
  • La Mede refinery operating at 75% of capacity while 4 others are halted; Total operates 5 of France’s 8 refineries

Potential Strike Action…

  • Norway oil industry faces risk of strikes after talks between oil cos., Industry Energy union broke down in less than a minute
  • “The differences were so obvious so early on that it was just as well to make an appointment with the National Mediator right away rather than sit here for two days,” says union leader Leif Sande
  • Brazil FUP oil union plans 1-day national strike on June 10 to protest against acting president Michel Temer
  • Says workers will lose benefits under new administration, Petrobras could be privatized

Other Headlines…

  • Russia said to export 28 cargoes of ESPO crude for July, up from 23 in June: 4 people w/ knowledge
  • Japan crude imports rise 3.4% y/y to 16.54m kls in April: METI
  • Oman crude official price for July set at $44.31, highest this yr; up from $39.40 in June: DME
     

via http://ift.tt/1TI0XGG Tyler Durden

Consumer Confidence Plunges To 10-Month Lows As Job ‘Hope’ Fades

The Conference Board's consumer confidence measure has hovered around the 95 level for the last 6 months (as gas prices dipped and ripped, as stock prices dipped and ripped, and as political chaos reigned). This 'stability' is in stark contrast to other surveys of confidence such as Bloomberg's and Gallup's which are both at multi-month lows… until today. Consumer Confidence plunged to 92.6 (missing expectations of 96.1 by the most since November). May's dismal print (a 3 sigma miss) is below the lowest of 68 economist estimates as expectations slipped modestly but Present Situation tumbled with optimism on jobs sliding to 6-month lows.

Finally, government confidence data declines to other survey's realities…

Consumers’ assessment of current conditions weakened in May. The percentage stating business conditions are “good” improved from 24.2 percent to 25.9 percent. However, those saying business conditions are “bad” also increased, from 18.2 percent to 21.6 percent. Consumers’ appraisal of the labor market was less favorable. The proportion claiming jobs are “plentiful” was virtually unchanged at 24.3 percent, however those claiming jobs are “hard to get” increased from 22.8 percent to 24.4 percent.

Consumers were less optimistic about the short-term outlook than last month. Those expecting business conditions to improve over the next six months increased from 13.8 percent to 15.1 percent, but those expecting business conditions to worsen also rose, from 10.8 percent to 11.6 percent.

Consumers’ outlook for the labor market was less favorable. Those anticipating more jobs in the months ahead was virtually unchanged at 12.8 percent, but those anticipating fewer jobs increased from 16.7 percent to 18.1 percent.

“Consumer confidence declined slightly in May, primarily due to consumers rating current conditions less favorably than in April,” said Lynn Franco, Director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board.

 

Expectations declined further, as consumers remain cautious about the outlook for business and labor market conditions. Thus, they continue to expect little change in economic activity in the months ahead.”

via http://ift.tt/1VsyYiD Tyler Durden

Huffington Post Removes Article Claiming Hillary Will Be Indicted On Federal Racketeering Charges

The Huffington Post has removed an article on its website Sunday, claiming that the FBI plans to indict Hillary Clinton on federal racketeering charges.

As Breitbart first reported, HuffPo freelance contributor Frank Huguenard, a scientist and public speaker, posted an article on the site’s blog entitled “Hillary Clinton to be Indicted on Federal Racketeering Charges.” Huguenard wrote:

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime.  RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.

 

Activity considered to be racketeering may include bribery, counterfeiting, money laundering, embezzlement, illegal gambling, kidnapping, murder, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other nefarious business practices.

 

James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.

If accurate, this could be a terminal hit to Hillary’s presidential chances, and it is obvious why a left-leaning medium, and audience, would be disturbed by its content.

The piece was publicized on Twitter by conservatives including Clinton critic Jared Wyand:

It is unclear at this time whether the article was taken down due to editorial intervention happened to the article, or a technical glitch, although the article link now directs to a page that says “404” with a frownie face and the message “This is so embarrassing” after Huffington Post took the piece down Sunday.

A note at the bottom of the original article explains that “This post
is hosted on the Huffington Post’s Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.”

It appears that many HuffPo readers found the article precisely that.

via http://ift.tt/25wRucK Tyler Durden

Chicago PMI Slumps Back Into Contraction; Election Blamed

Having wavered around the magical '50' level for much of the last year, bouncing off December plunge lows, Chicago PMI printed below expectations of 50.5 at a contractionary 49.3 – the 6th month of contraction in the last 12 months. With weakness in new orders (lowest since Dec 2015) and production (both back into contraction), MNI notes that on the heels of April's decline, the latest results show activity stumbling in the second quarter, following only moderate growth in Q1.

The 8th month of contraction in th elast 14..

As MNI reports, barring a solid revival in June, Q2 could be the weakest outturn since the fourth quarter of 2015 as the April-May Barometer average stood at just 49.9.

Stocks of finished goods fell deeper into contraction to the lowest since November 2009, and the seventh consecutive month in contraction. While a rebuilding over the coming months could support output, the underlying message appears to be that businesses are not confident about the outlook for growth, which makes some averse to stock building.

This lack of confidence was underlined by the answer to this month's special question which showed that 68.7% of panellists did not plan to increase business investment over the next six months.

The persistence of weak business conditions was blamed partly on efforts to keep businesses lean headed into the November US Presidential election. Others cited slowing in China and India and a reluctance to build inventories. Moreover, a mismatch between sales and operational planning was reported at some companies.

Charts: Bloomberg

via http://ift.tt/25ylWXo Tyler Durden

Lawsuit Says Detroit Cops Shot Confined Dog Through Bathroom Door

A federal lawsuit filed last week says Detroit police officers serving a drug warrant gratuitously shot three dogs that were not threatening them in any way, including one that was confined in a bathroom, which they shot through the door. The lawsuit, first reported by the New York Daily News, says the cops “acted as [a] dog death squad and stormed through the house, executing Plaintiffs’ dogs as they went.”

In their complaint, Nikita Smith and Kevin Thomas, who share a house on Sussex Street, say “a large number” of cops arrived there about 12:30 p.m. on January 14, demanding entry. Smith, who was home alone at the time, called out, “Let me put my dogs down in the basement.” She put her two pit bulls, a male named Debo and a pregnant female named Mama, in the basement and blocked the door leading from it. She put the third dog, a female Rottweiler named Smoke, in a bathroom and closed the door.

After police “entered the residence without permission,” Debo managed to get past the barrier across the doorway to the basement and sat down next to Smith. As she reached out to him, police opened fire and shot him several times, even though Smith was nearby. “You could have been killed,” one officer later said, according to the lawsuit. After killing Debo, the cops then went down into the basement and shot Mama, who “was not barking or attacking the police at any time.”

Next an officer opened the bathroom door, saw Smoke, and closed the door. “Should we do that one, too?” a cop asked. “Yes,” another answered. Two cops “then fired multiple shots through the closed bathroom door, which killed Smoke.” One of them reportedly exclaimed, “Did you see that? I got that one good!” The evidence introduced by Smith and Thomas includes pictures of the bloody aftermath and bullet holes in the bathroom door.

According to The Detroit News, a police report obtained by Chris Olson, the lawyer representing Smith and Thomas, claims the dogs were aggressive. The report says one officer “encountered a vicious gray pit bull at the front door, at which time he fired his department issued shotgun, striking the dog.” But the lawsuit says “none of Plaintiffs’ dogs attacked or threatened [any] Defendant in any way,” and it is hard to see how a dog shut in a bathroom could have posed an imminent threat. Photography Is Not a Crime reports that “police claimed they had no audio or video of the incident.”

The version of events described in the lawsuit is sadly plausible, given the past behavior of cops confronting dogs in Detroit and elsewhere. A month after police killed Debo, Mama, and Smoke, the Detroit City Council approved a $100,000 settlement with the owner of a chained Dogue de Bordeaux shot by police looking for a suspect who was not there. In that case the officer who killed the dog also claimed it posed a threat, saying “a brown dog charged towards me, attempting to bite me.” But according to the owner’s lawsuit, dashcam video of the incident shows the officer “walk towards Babycakes in her driveway to a position just beyond the reach of Babycakes’ steel cable leash, pause, aim and shoot her twice with his department issued M&P 40 caliber handgun.”

After the settlement, Olson, who also represented the dog owner in that case, expressed the hope that “police officers in Detroit will hear this story and be much more mindful of the magnitude of the rights that are involved here.” The unnecessary killing of a dog can qualify as an unconsitutional seizure of property under the Fourth Amendment. Olson cites a 2005 decision in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held that “defendant police’s shooting of plaintiff’s dogs was an unreasonable seizure in particular where defendant police officers had notice of the dog’s presence and were not surprised by them and had no plan to deal with the dog other than by shooting it.”

Smith says one of the officers who raided her home told her, “I should have killed you, too.”  Olson told The Daily News “she’s terrified,” since “those same cops drive through her neighborhood every day.” Smith was initially charged with marijuana possession, but the case was dismissed after the cops failed to appear in court.

“They had a warrant to search the house,” Olson said. “That we don’t really quarrel with. But when you search the house, you can’t go in the house and kill all the dogs.”

Since the justification for the search was something (drug possession) that shouldn’t be treated as a crime, and the resulting charge was so trivial that the cops could not be bothered to show up in court, we really should quarrel with the idea that police had a right to be in the house. Every confrontation prompted by the morally atrocious war on drugs is an invitation to violence, and all too frequently it’s human blood that ends up on the floor.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/1PfFTL0
via IFTTT

Allergan Stock Surges After Carl Icahn Announces “Large Position” In The Company

Carl Icahn appears to be a big fan of Brent Saunders. After Icahn was instrumental in placing his favorite CEO at the top of Forest Labs before it was acquired by Actavis several years ago – a deal which made then Forest Labs investor Carl Icahn hundreds of millions in profit – the billionaire investor is now doubling down on Saunders, and moments ago the billionaire investor announced that he has acquired a “large position” in Allergan, and confirms he is “very supportive of CEO Brent Saunders.”

Does this mean that Allergan, whose stock recently tumbled after the Pfizer deal was terminated due to Congressional intervention, is once again back in play?

From the release:

May 31, 2016

 

We have recently acquired a large position in Allergan and are very supportive of CEO Brent Saunders. We were instrumental in bringing Brent on board as the new CEO of Forest Labs a few years ago and worked cooperatively and constructively with him to help increase value for all Forest shareholders. Less than a year later Forest was acquired by Actavis (which subsequently merged with Allergan) resulting in massive gains for Forest shareholders. While we at that time disposed of our position in Forest, we still have always maintained great respect for Brent. We have every confidence in Brent’s ability to enhance value for all Allergan shareholders.

AGN stock is loving it.

via http://ift.tt/1O1FOdt Tyler Durden