Does Political Extremism Pay or Penalize Presidential Candidates? New at Reason

ClintonTrumpChineNouvelleSIPANewscomHow does political extremism play out in American politics? Two new political science studies perhaps provide some insight into how public policy might evolve after the presidential election on November 8. One study shows that extremist arguments can be effective in shifting public policy debates. Another reports that since 1948 American voters have not penalized more ideologically extreme presidential candidates. The upshot is that if the predictive models are working, then Hillary Clinton should be losing due to weariness with the incumbent party and a relatively lousy economy. On the other hand, Donald Trump’s extremist ideology—if you can call the mish-mash of his often contradictory diatribes an ideology—may undermine the claim that ideology plays essentially no role in determining the winners of American presidential elections. We’ll see soon if these theories pan out.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2eDWI4B
via IFTTT

FBI Said To Reopen Probe Into Hillary Clinton Emails

In a stunning development moments ago Jason Chaffetz tweeted that the FBI’s probe into Hillary Clinton emails has been reopened: saying that “The FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation.”

According to additional reports, the FBI is said to have learned of the existence of additional material, although FBI Direct Comey adds that it is unclear if the material is significant.

Moments later, NBC News reported that the agency was reopening the investigation and shared a letter from FBI director James Comey informing key lawmakers of the investigation.. .

“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation,” Comey wrote.

 

“I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information,” Comey wrote

While we seek more information, the Mexian Peso has just crashed in reaction to the news.

 

And stocks have erased any gains for the day.

 

And Bonds & Bullion safe havens are bid for now.

 

Charts: Bloomberg

via http://ift.tt/2dU1o2j Tyler Durden

US Oil Rig Count Declines For First Time In 4 Months

For the first time in 4 months, the US Oil Rig Count declined last week (down 2 to 441) as the total rig count rose 4 to 557 (gas rigs up 6). Oil remains above the $49.00 level for now.

 

 

While US Crude Production has stagnated around 8.5mm barrels/day, the lagged pick up in the oil rig count suggests production is set to rise notably soon…

 

Charts: Bloomberg

via http://ift.tt/2fnHCBr Tyler Durden

John Podesta’s Sister-in-Law Lobbied For Raytheon While Hillary Was Secretary of State

screen-shot-2016-10-28-at-10-36-40-am

The Podesta family seems particularly adept at earning extraordinary sums of money via selling out the American public. Earlier this year, I highlighted how John Podesta’s brother Tony was paid $140,000 per month by the medieval monarchy of Saudi Arabia. After all, who cares about women’s rights when the pay is good?

Here’s a excerpt from the post, “Getting Things Done” – The Brother of Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Chair is a Major Lobbyist for Saudi Arabia:

The kingdom employs a total of eight American firms that perform lobbying, consulting, public relations and legal work.

Five of the firms work for the Saudi Arabia Embassy, while another two — Podesta Group and BGR Group — have registered to represent the Center for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court, an arm of the government. PR giant Edelman, meanwhile, is working for the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority to encourage international investment.

The Podesta Group is billing Saudi Arabia $140,000 a month for its public relations services. During the last few months of 2015, it sent 27 emails, had two phone calls and one meeting with lawmakers and staffers, journalists, and organizations including Human Rights Watch and the Center for American Progress, disclosure forms show.

DLA Piper receives $50,000 a month from the kingdom and sent hundreds of emails to top congressional staffers between September and the end of February regarding meeting requests and, more generally, “issues affecting U.S.-Saudi Arabia national security interests.” 

Notice the firm DLA Piper mentioned above. You’ll want to remember that for later.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/2fnHBNW
via IFTTT

In Latest Blow To US, Malaysia Will Buy Navy Vessels From China

Having largely lost long-time ally Philippines as an anchor to US foreign policy in the Pacific rim, a loss which comes at a critical time for the US just as China is aggressively expanding its territorial ambitions in the South China Sea, Washington is set to lose another key ally, and a critical one at that: as Reuters reports, in a “blow to the US“, Malaysia’s corrupt Prime Minister Najib Razak, whose involvement in the 1MBD scandal has been extensively reported by the WSJ for over a year now, will sign a contract to purchase Littoral Mission Ships from China when he visits Beijing next week, according to a Facebook posting by the country’s Ministry of Defense.

The text of a speech to be delivered by Malaysian defense minister Hishammuddin Hussein appears to have been accidentally posted on Facebook on Tuesday, but was later removed after Reuters asked a defence ministry spokesman for comment.

The purchase of the patrol vessels, if it proceeds, would be Malaysia’s first significant defence deal with China and comes amid rising tensions in the South China Sea and as the United States and China compete for influence in the region. It would also be the latest, if far more nuanced, pivot away from a US sphere of inluence in the region since Philippines’ Duterte said he was severing ties with the US last week.

China’s foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang said on Friday he was “unclear on the specifics of the situation”. But responding to a Reuters question at the daily ministry briefing he noted China and Malaysia “continue to cooperate and communicate regularly across all spheres”.

Why the diplomatic fallout between the US and Malaysia?

One reason, as we noted last weekend, is that thanks to the Podesta leaks, we got a glimpse into the real reason for the TPP, which was to appease countries such as Malaysia and prevent them from shifting to a pro-Chinese trade sphere. As a Soros memo revealed, “Malaysia received more TPP carve-outs than any other TPP member country.” However, now that the TPP appears to be in jeopardy, any leverage the US may have had with Razak has been put on hiatus and gives Kuala Lumpur a green light to pursue Beijing and see just what they have to counteroffer.

A more acute reason is that Malaysia’s ties with the US were substantially strained after the Department of Justice filed lawsuits linked to a money-laundering investigation at state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), which Najib founded and had overseen as chairman of its advisory council.

So, feeling betrayed by his former close golfing buddy, Barack Obama, Najib is traveling to China on Sunday for a week-long visit to see just what Beijing’s proposal is.

“On November 5, 2016, the Defence Ministry will sign a contract for the procurement of Littoral Mission Ships (LMS) with SASTIND (the State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense), which is an important part of the schedule during the Prime Minister’s official visit to China,” the Facebook post quotes Hishammuddin saying.

As Reuters adds, a defence ministry spokesman declined to comment and the prime minister’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

What Malaysia will allegely purchase from China are Littoral Mission Ships, fast patrol vessels that can be equipped with a helicopter flight deck and carry missiles. They are primarily used for coastal security, maritime patrol and surveillance, but can also be deployed for disaster relief and search and rescue operations.

Malaysia could buy up to 10 of the littoral mission ships at a cost of approximately 300 million ringgit ($71.43 million) each, said Lam Choong Wah, senior fellow at REFSA, a Malaysia research institute. He is also the author of a book on Malaysian military capability. It is very possible that China will provide the loans for the purchase, serving as a regional Ex-Im bank.

China claims most of the South China Sea as its territory. But Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam also have rival claims to parts of the waterway, which commands strategic sea lanes which carry some $5 trillion worth of trade a year. Of course, providing both Philippines and Malaysia with military equipment will assure their continued compliance with any territorial expansions by China, despite Washington’s loud protests.

Meanwhile, as relations between the US and Malaysia have deteriorated, ties between Malaysia and China reached a new peak in December when China came to Najib’s rescue with a $2.3 billion deal to buy assets of scandal-hit state fund 1MDB, helping ease Najib’s concern over the firm’s mounting debt. Najib is traveling with dozens of government leaders and business people to China. In a statement on Wednesday, he said Malaysia was committed to strengthening friendship with China and pushing ties to “new highs”.

Najib’s visit follows that of the Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte, who announced the country’s “separation” from the United States and signed a raft of memoranda of understanding for Chinese investment in the country.

And as Malaysia joins the new Asian axis, which involves China and the Philippines, and perhaps Russia, the US is finding itself with increasingly fewer allies: “the push to strengthen China ties come after July lawsuits filed by the U.S. Justice Department implicating Najib in a money-laundering scandal”, Reuters notes. The lawsuits allege over $3.5 billion was misappropriated from 1MDB, some of which ended up with a ‘Malaysian Official 1,’ identified later by U.S. and Malaysian authorities as Najib.

Confirming the strategic rationale behind the move, Lam Choong Wah added that “the truth is we could have bought these from a number of countries. But China is the only country that has provided political support for Malaysia during the 1MDB scandal. This is payback for that political support.

It appears that Joe Biden, Clinton’s Secretary of State will be very busy undoing what is rapidly becoming the worst Asian “balance of power” strategic mess in decades, assuming of course that Hillary gets elected.

via http://ift.tt/2fnATHr Tyler Durden

Conservatarian Novelist Brad Thor: ISIS Exemplifies Islam, Trump and Clinton are Terrible (New at Reason)

In an unbroken chain of best-selling and page-turning thrillers featuring special-ops agent Scot Harvath, Brad Thor has created a fictional universe that reflects our chaotic contemporary world.

Thor’s latest book, Foreign Agent, engages the threat of extremist Islam and provocatively argues (amidst the action scenes and plot twists) that the truest form of the faith isn’t practiced by contemporary reformers but by fundamentalist Muslims and the terrorists in ISIS and Al Qaeda.

Click below for full text, links, and downloadable versions.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Like us on Facebook.

Follow us on Twitter.

Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2eN2MoW
via IFTTT

Volcker the Vulture Points to U.S. ‘Debt Problem’

 

Hold your real assets outside of the banking system in one of many private international facilities  –>    http://ift.tt/2cyFwvQ;

 

 

 

Volcker the Vulture Points to U.S. ‘Debt Problem’



 

Paul Volcker has coasted through his life being revered by most pundits. However, previous commentaries have not been so kind in evaluating this infamous central banker. Volcker recently penned a piece for the New York Times titled “Ignoring the Debt Problem”. In writing this piece; Volcker has demonstrated at the
least that he is severely irony-impaired. At worst, Volcker has shown the world that he is a shameless hypocrite. As an aside, he is also apparently incapable of performing simple arithmetic.

 

Insults, invective and pandering have been poor substitutes for serious debate about the direction in which this country is going — or should be going. And a sound and sustainable fiscal structure is a key ingredient of any viable economic policy


Yes, this country can handle the nearly $600 billion federal deficit estimated for 2016. But the deficit has grown sharply this year, and will keep the national debt at about 75 percent of the gross domestic product, a ratio not seen since 1950, after the budget ballooned during World War II.


The picture Volcker paints is relatively clear. The infantile politicians of the U.S.’s Two-Party Dictatorship spend their time engaging in pointless grandstanding and/or juvenile mud-slinging at their supposed opponents rather than focusing on prudent fiscal management of the nation. Meanwhile, the United States is developing a severe debt problem. Unfortunately, Volcker’s self-serving description of the state of the U.S. economy and the (lack of) fiscal responsibility of the U.S. government bears little resemblance to the real world.

 

The U.S. national debt is about 75% of GDP? What year was that, Paul?

 

Anyone capable of Googling the U.S. “debt clock” will already know that the current, U.S. national mega-debt totals $19.7 trillion – and is rising rapidly. U.S. GDP for 2015 was reported at just under $18 trillion. Even if we back up the U.S. debt clock to the beginning of this year, we see that the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio is well over 100%, and has been at that level for many years.

 

However, for those living in the real world, even a debt-to-GDP ratio for the U.S. of slightly more than 100% is a ridiculous understatement. U.S. GDP is systematically padded with more than $2 trillion/year of imaginary economic activity, thus real U.S. GDP is at an annual level somewhere below $16 trillion.

 

Then we have the U.S. “national debt”. The only U.S. statistical measurements which have been more heavily and systematically falsified than this number are U.S. inflation and job-creation mythology. To begin with, several $trillions of this debt have been fraudulently altered into “liabilities” instead of official debt, in order to pretend that the U.S.’s national debt is much lower than it is in reality.

 

This budget-fraud has been accomplished primarily via the U.S. government ransacking what it calls its government “trust funds”. Normally, a trust fund is a sacrosanct pool of wealth, with a legal firewall which prevents any encroachment on those funds. With the U.S. government, it treats its so-called trust funds the same way that a child treats his/her piggy-bank: it raids the funds any/every time it’s looking for some spending money.

 

This accounting fraud is illegal. If the U.S.’s suit-stuffers in Congress ever attempted such accounting chicanery in the real world, they would be immediately prosecuted for fraud. Beyond this, the U.S. government is carrying somewhere in the vicinity of $200 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities. In the real world, corporations are also required to account for their liabilities on their balance sheets. In the fantasy-world of the U.S. government, this $200 trillion is completely ignored in calculating its fiscal status.

 

The real U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio is somewhere around 150% (even without the $200 trillion in unfunded liabilities), making the United States one of the Western world’s worst deadbeat debtors. The U.S. is well past merely having a “debt problem”, it is hopelessly insolvent. However, let’s put aside the phony numbers on U.S. GDP and the fraudulent numbers on U.S. debt. The real, salient point here as Paul Volcker accuses American politicians of ignoring the U.S.’s obvious insolvency is that Volcker himself was the original architect of that insolvency.

 

Volcker continues spewing fiction:

 

Our current debt may be manageable at a time of unprecedentedly low interest rates. But if we let our debt grow, and interest rates normalize, the interest burden alone would choke our budget and squeeze out other essential spending. There would be no room for the infrastructure programs and the defense rebuilding that today have wide support.


Manageable? What Volcker conveniently leaves out of his fairy-tale is that there is no one buying any of the fraud-bonds of Western governments except other Western governments – a daisy-chain of debt. It’s only through conjuring near-infinite quantities of (worthless) funny-money to buy each other’s bonds that these deadbeat regimes are paying the lowest interest rates in history at a time of mass insolvency. See what sort of interest rate your banker offers you, when you’re so broke you have to borrow money to pay the interest on your debts.

 

If Western interest rates were normalized today, virtually every Western government would be bankrupt within a year. Here it must be understood that “normal” interest rates for regimes which are carrying the highest debts in history mean interest rates which are above average, not far, far, far below average.

 

To suggest that essential spending would be “squeezed out” by normalized interest rates is absurd understatement. Normal interest rates would mean at least a quintupling of U.S. interest payments, to more than $1 trillion per year (and rising). As for infrastructure, there is hardly any (non-military) infrastructure being built in the West today – even with our fraudulent interest rates. Only the Western war machines remain fully funded.

 

Laughably, Volcker is celebrated as the central banker who supposedly vanquished inflation. Anyone comparing consumer prices in the 1980’s with consumer prices today knows that Volcker never accomplished anything more than a brief pause in the inflation rate — inflation created by central bank money-printing from people such as himself.

 

The Volcker policy which briefly blunted inflation was the most-draconian interest rate policy ever seen in the modern history of the global economy. Volcker drove up the U.S. benchmark interest rate as high as 20%, with interest rates around the world driven to similar levels. While Volcker was driving up interest rates to several multiples of the norm, he was simultaneously doing something else: driving up interest payments on sovereign debts, all over the world.

 

Paul Volcker is the Father of Global Insolvency. This one economic criminal did more to drown the world in debt than every other central banker he preceded. During the “Reagan era” (i.e. the Volcker era), the U.S. national debt tripled – in a mere eight years. However, this is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of Volcker’s economic crimes against humanity.

 

Retrospectively, Volcker now claims personal credit for being the single figure most responsible for assassinating the gold standard. Among the virtues of the gold standard is that it made it impossible for central banks to engage in the sort of reckless money-printing which is now standard across the Western world. It also made it impossible for governments to run large operating deficits, since the gold standard enforces a balance of payments.

 

It is these attributes of the gold standard which caused gold-hater, John Keynes, to derisively christen the gold standard “the Golden Handcuffs”. According to Keynes, the two greatest virtues of the gold standard are supposedly its two greatest flaws. We thus have the following chronology. Paul Volcker drowned the world in debt as a response to Paul Volcker drowning the world in inflation – the near-instantaneous consequence of Paul Volcker abolishing the gold standard.

 

Volcker the Vulture now sheds crocodile tears over U.S. indebtedness. Totally absent from his Revisionist fiction is that no one is more responsible for the current fiscal status of the U.S. economy than Volcker himself.

 

Seeing Paul Volcker “warn” the U.S. government about debt is much like seeing his successor, Alan Greenspan warning people about asset bubbles. Both of these former central bankers are shameless hypocrites, warning us about sins for which they were the worst perpetrators. The global economy was solvent before Paul Volcker. It has never been the same since.

 

 

 

Please email with any questions about this article or precious metals HERE

 

 

 



via http://ift.tt/2e4Xk2s Sprott Money

5 Things You Need To Know About The Dakota Access Pipeline Protests

Submitted by Nick Bernabe via TheAntiMedia.org,

A small Standing Rock Sioux site in North Dakota called the Sacred Stone Camp has been propelled into the national news narrative following their stand against the Dakota Access Pipeline. Due in part to independent media coverage of the ongoing standoff, the Sacred Stone camp has grown into a formidable opposition against the $3.8 billion, 1,200-mile long pipeline.

Due to misinformation coming from law-enforcement, political favoritism toward the pipeline builders, and the media’s blatant reluctance to report on the pipeline, it’s hard to tell truth from fiction. Anti-Media, along with our partners in the independent media and our embedded journalist at the opposition encampment, have been covering the unfolding standoff continuously. Here are five things you need to know.

1. Who is opposing the pipeline — and why

Dakota Access Pipeline

The Standing Rock Sioux tribe is leading the opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline. They have been joined by the largest tribal coalition in over 100 years in their stand against the pipeline. The coalition is also comprised of activists, allies, and environmentalists, collectively known as “water protectors,” at the Sacred Stone Camp, an encampment close to the location where the pipeline is planned to cross the Missouri River in North Dakota. According to the Sacred Stone camp website, they are opposing the pipeline because “[t]he Dakota Access threatens everything from farming and drinking water to entire ecosystems, wildlife and food sources surrounding the Missouri.”

The Standing Rock Sioux also say the pipeline is violating treaty land, Sioux territory that was established many years ago by the federal government. “We will not allow Dakota Access to trespass on our treaty territory and destroy our medicines and our culture.”

The opposition to the pipeline spreads across several states and is not opposed solely by Native Americans. Farmers, ranchers, and landowners are also opposed to the pipeline. Many of them have had their land taken from them against their will and given to the pipeline via eminent domain.

2. The U.S. government and the pipeline corporation are continuing a long tradition of disrespecting Native Americans

dakota access pipeline

The United States has a very bad reputation for treating Native Americans, the original inhabitants of this land, as less than human. In many instances in the past, the land where Native Americans lived was deemed to be of higher value than the Natives’ lives.

Such has been the case in North Dakota — not only now, but in the past as well. According to The Atlantic:

“The land beneath the pipeline was accorded to Sioux peoples by the Treaty of Fort Laramie in 1868. Eleven years later, the U.S. government incited and won the Great Sioux War, and ‘renegotiated’ a new treaty with the Sioux under threat of starvation. In that document, the tribe ceded much of the Laramie land, including the Black Hills of South Dakota, where many whites believed there to be gold.”

After the federal government relegated the Sioux people to the “Great Sioux Reservation” in 1851, the treaty was re-written and “renegotiated” by force whenever resources were discovered or when the U.S. government wanted land. Essentially, the Sioux people were victims of U.S.-sanctioned murder, and their land was stolen because gold was discovered on it.

Fast forward to 2016 and the Sioux people are once again making a stand on land that was once — and still is, according to the tribe — theirs. How is the government reacting to this stand? By brutally arresting the Native American water protectors for trespassing. If that is not a miscarriage of justice, I don’t know what is.

Further, Energy Transfer Partners, the company pulling the strings behind the DAPL, has deep pockets, and its lobbyists have cozied up to federal, state, and local governments with jurisdiction over the pipeline route. This could explain why the company began its construction of the pipeline on Army Corps of Engineers land without even securing an easement, which is required by law. Dakota Access LLC, a subsidiary of Energy Transfer Partners, has also used the strong-arm of government to force farmers and landowners to hand over their land to the pipeline against their will.

3. Violent acts are being carried out in North Dakota, but not by the water protectors

dakota access pipeline

Violence is breaking out at the Dakota Access Protest site, but the protesters have nothing to do with it. Pipeline police, bolstered by the North Dakota National Guard and sheriffs imported from around the country, have turned the standoff into a war zone. Water protectors are regularly pepper sprayed, tear gassed, and violently arrested. Over the weekend, 127 people were detained in the biggest mass arrest to date.

Militarized police at the Dakota Access Pipeline site are decked out in riot gear, armed with military grade weapons, use armored cars or MRAPs with snipers on top of them, and have regularly used LRADs, a type of mass crowd dispersal weapon that uses a high pitched noise to hurt people’s ears —sometimes permanently.

Early reports of protesters being armed and violent have proven to be instances of misinformation spread by law enforcement apparently seeking to demonize the opposition. No credible reports of violence by the protesters have been confirmed or prosecuted. Nearly all arrests stem from trespassing charges or crimes of journalism.

When protesters initially began using civil disobedience to physically shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline site, they were confronted violently by security guards from British mercenary firm G4S. The mercs sicced dogs and used pepper spray on the protesters in an assault that went viral and helped catalyze even more support for the water protectors.

4. Independent media is under attack at the Dakota Access Pipeline — and the corporate media is ignoring it

North-Dakota-DAPL

Independent media’s broadcasts over the Internet are basically the only reason people around the country and the world now know about the struggle at Standing Rock. Unfortunately, journalists are not immune to the police crackdowns in North Dakota. Dozens of journalists have now been arrested, and an arrest warrant was issued for high-profile journalist Amy Goodman. One independent media outlet, Unicorn Riot, saw four of their journalists arrested in one day in North Dakota. One filmmaker is facing up to 45 years in prison for filming acts of civil disobedience against the pipeline.

Anti-Media’s journalist on the ground, Derrick Broze, was tased by law enforcement while covering the protests on Thursday as this article was being written.

Meanwhile, the national corporate media ignored the battle against the Dakota Access Pipeline as long as they could. For months, despite the DAPL emergence into the national narrative, ABC and NBC refused to air any coverage about it. A woman was arrested for protesting the pipeline on her own farm after Dakota Access LLC gained access to it against her will via eminent domain — yet there was still no corporate media coverage on the incident.

5. How you can help the opposition

Now that you see what water protectors are up against in North Dakota, here’s what you can do to help.

  • Get yourself to the Sacred Stone Camp. The water protectors need reinforcements as people are regularly arrested. The bigger the stand, the more likely the pipeline’s construction will be halted. Here’s how to get there.
  • Send supplies or donations. Water protectors need your help with supplies and funding. Go to this link to send supplies. Go to this link to donate to the cause.
  • Support independent journalists that risk arrest to bring you the news from the front lines. Follow Sacred Stone Camp on Facebook. Share this article.
  • For 10 more ways to get involved, click here.

via http://ift.tt/2e4THJK Tyler Durden

Brexit Blowback Begins: UK Home Electronics Prices Spike As Currency Crashes

The Brexit blowback on British consumers tightened today as Apple and Electrolux responded to the collapsing pound by charging dramatically more for their products in the UK. As Bloomberg reports, Apple quietly raised the cost of some of its machines including the “Mac Pro” by 20% overnight, while Sweden’s Electrolux said it’s boosting the prices of its home appliances by 10%.

With inflation already accelerating at the fastest in two years, Bloomberg notes that price pressures are likely to mount as the weakest pound in three decades forces up the cost of imports just weeks before Christmas.

The price hikes came days after “Marmitegate” saw supermarket Tesco Plc battle with supplier Unilever over the cost of goods and Microsoft Corp. began charging Britons more for some of its software.

 

“We will see more price increases, possibly more at the higher end of the market, and we’ll see a significant squeeze on real incomes and then we’ll see how it plays out,” said Kit Juckes, a London-based strategist at Societe Generale SA.

 

Apple began charging 2,999 pounds ($3,650) for its “Mac Pro” desktop machine, up from 2,499 pounds earlier in the week. The “Mac Mini” now retails at 479 pounds compared to 399 pounds. The U.S. prices for the Mac Mini and Mac Pro haven’t been changed.

 

 

“Apple suggests product prices internationally on the basis of several factors, including currency exchange rates, local import laws, business practices, taxes, and the cost of doing business,” an Apple spokesman said in a statement. “These factors vary from region to region and over time, such that international prices are not always comparable to U.S. suggested retail prices.”

 

Electrolux CEO Jonas Samuelson says main effect of Brexit is that GBP has devalued sharply against EUR, adding that "we need to compensate by raising prices,” in the U.K. Samuelson raised prices in U.K. by up to 10% and notes "we’ve seen clear cautiousness from retail and construction, which has put slight pressure on demand, but we haven’t seen any larger effects on consumer demand”

One government official this week told British consumers to brace for higher prices.

“We have had Marmageddon,” Mark Garnier, the U.K.’s trade minister, said in an interview.

 

Consumers are going to start to see rising prices and there’s nothing we can do about that. That was a well-predicted effect of Brexit. The point was very clearly made by everybody: Brexit could easily result in a slump in the value of sterling. That has transpired.”

With the pound continuing to collapse this morning following the Brexit suit outcome, and Goldman's estimates of considerably more pain to come, inflationary pressures may just be too much for Carney to overlook as transitory this time.

via http://ift.tt/2e4Mycy Tyler Durden