Mattress Girl Lives On: New at Reason

Cathy Young’s reporting more than two years ago blew huge holes in the story of “mattress girl” Emma Sulkowicz, whose story of rape at Columbia University drew national attention. The media, Young writes, is still buying her story in spite of a recent settlement that all but exonerates her supposed attacker.

When a disciplinary hearing in late 2013 cleared Paul Nungesser of charges that he raped Sulkowicz, she refused to accept the outcome. Her protest—which included carrying a mattress on campus for most of her senior year to represent the “weight” of her victimization—made her the heroine of a new feminist revolution. It also made him the campus pariah after she outed him as her alleged rapist.

While the terms of the settlement are unknown, Columbia issued a statement effectively reaffirming Nungesser’s exoneration. This was an important victory not just for Nungesser and his family, but for those who have argued the war on campus rape, however worthy its goals, has often trampled on the innocent.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2u68p8d
via IFTTT

Latest North Korean ICBM Can Reach Los Angeles, Denver, Chicago

While North Korea has fired numerous test missiles (mostly intermediate-range) in the past, and as such today’s launch was largely seen as merely the latest political “dare” to Trump by a seemingly oblivious Kim John-Un, there was one notable difference in the launch post-mortem: according to press and Pentagon reports, the maximum altitude attained by the ICBM was 3,700 km (2,300 miles) with a flight time of about 47 minutes. This is material because according to All Things Nuclear, based on the latest information, today’s missile test by North Korea could easily reach not only the US West Coast, but also a number of major US cities.

As reported earlier, North Korea launched its missile on a very highly lofted trajectory, which allowed the missile to fall in the Sea of Japan rather than overflying Japan. It appears the ground range of the test was around 1,000 km (600 miles), which put it in or close to Japanese territorial waters.

According to physicist and co-director of the UCS Global Security Program, David Wright, if those numbers are correct, then the missile flown on a standard trajectory would have a range 10,400 km (6,500 miles), not taking into account the Earth’s rotation. Adding the rotation of the Earth increases the range of missiles fired eastward, depending on their direction. Calculating the range of the missile in the direction of some major US cities gives the approximate results in Table 1.

Table 1 shows that Los Angeles, Denver, and Chicago appear to be well within range of this missile, and that Boston and New York may be just within range. Washington, D.C. may be just out of range.

Wright caveats his calculations saying that “it is important to keep in mind that we do not know the mass of the payload the missile carried on this test. If it was lighter than the actual warhead the missile would carry, the ranges would be shorter than those estimated above.”

While the above calculation has yet to be confirmed by third parties, the US is not taking any chances. According to Reuters, top U.S. and South Korean military officials “discussed military options after North Korea launched an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on Friday.”

Marine General Joseph Dunford was joined by the Commander of U.S. Pacific Command, Admiral Harry Harris, when they called General Lee Sun-jin, chairman of the South Korean Joint Chief of Staff. “During the call Dunford and Harris expressed the ironclad commitment to the U.S.-Republic of Korea alliance. The three leaders also discussed military response options,” said Captain Greg Hicks, a spokesman for Dunford.

In light of North Korea’s reportedly expanded offensive capabilities, now that the US has an justification to launch a preemptive “defensive” attack on Pyongyang, a US military operation in North Korea now appears to be only a matter of time.

via http://ift.tt/2v7iwxK Tyler Durden

Democrats Try to Attract White Workers, North Korea Improves on its Missiles, and Pakistan’s Prime Minister Steps Down: P.M. Links

  • U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton with former Prime Minister of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif at his residence in Lahore, Pakistan.Democrats are strategizing on how to reingratiate themselves with working class whites. Let’s hope they come up with some better ideas this time around.
  • North Korea conducts a new missile test, which apparently went pretty well. Some experts are saying that the missile would have the capability to reach the United States’ west coast.
  • Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, has resigned from office, after the country’s Supreme Court ordered him removed over accusations of corruption.
  • Charlie Gard, the terminally ill infant who sparked international controversy over end-of-life issues, died today. A British court had ruled he be removed from the ventilator allowing him to breath yesterday.
  • In the wake of Obamacare repeal’s failure, Vice has compiled a very helpful photo gallery of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell looking sad.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2v7I2Tm
via IFTTT

Trump Encourages Police to Brutalize Suspects

President Trump encouraged police to rough up arrested suspects in a speech in Long Island, New York, Friday afternoon, prompting cheers and applause from the audience of cops.

“When you see these towns, and when you see these thugs being thrown into the back of a paddy wagon, you just see them thrown in, rough,” Trump said. “And I said, ‘Please don’t be too nice.'”

“Like when you guys put somebody in the car and you’re protecting their head,” Trump continued. “You know, the way you put their hand over, like, don’t hit their head, and they’ve just killed somebody. Don’t hit their head. I said, ‘You can take the hand away, OK?'”

This usually doesn’t bear clarification, but since the president of the United States said it during a nationally televised speech: It is illegal for law enforcement to beat or otherwise use excessive force on suspects, who are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

For example, in Suffolk County, New York, where Trump was speaking, a police chief was sentenced last year to four years in prison for orchestrating the cover-up of the beating of a handcuffed heroin addict who had stolen several items from the chief’s SUV, including a bag full of sex toys and pornography.

The Huffington Post also reported that Trump said current laws “totally protect the criminal, not the officers.”

“We’re changing those laws,” Trump said.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2uGytdD
via IFTTT

Turmoil In Tech, Trannies, & Tobacco As Dollar Dumps To 2-Year Lows On Dismal Data

Some folks' stocks turmoiled but the message is clear…

 

Mixed bag on the week with Trannies tumbling most since Brexit, Dow outperforming on earnings beats, and tech weighing on Nasdaq and S&P…

 

Today's goal was to get the S&P green on the week and the instrument of choice was monkeyhammering the VIX again…BUT it failed!

 

Retailers and Energy stocks were best on the week and Utes worst…

 

Despite equity gains today, protection remained bid as VIX had its biggest weekly gain in 2 months…

 

Tobacco stocks got smoked…

 

FANG Stocks had their first down week in the last 4…

 

Jeff Bezos had an eventful week…

 

Treasuries ended the week higher (despite weak data, a dovish Fed) as we suspect the yuge ATT issuance and Risk-Parity deleveraging had an impact…

 

However, 30Y rallied back lower in yield today after GDP's miss…

 

The Dollar Index tumbled back towards the post-Fed lows today after bouncing yesterday… This was the lowest weekly close for the dollar since May 2015

 

WTI had its best week since the first week of Dec 2016, soaring almost 9% on the week…ending the week above its 200DMA just shy of $50…

 

Gold rose for the 3rd straight week –  breaking through its 50-, 100-, and 200-DMA and back to pre-Fed Rate-Hike levels…

 

Once again 'hard' data is plumbing new lows as 'soft' survey data limps higher on a magic carpet ride of hope…

 

This is probably nothing…

 

Finally, this… blow-off top next week?

via http://ift.tt/2eUXDzH Tyler Durden

Markets, Regulators Ignore Ticking Time Bomb Of Shadow Margin Loans

Authored by Wolf Richter via WolfStreet.com, 

Magnitude unknown but huge. Brokerages push it to new heights.

Stock and bond market leverage is everywhere. Some of it is transparent, such as NYSE margin debt which was $539 billion as of the June report. But the hottest form of stock and bond market leverage is opaque, offered by financial firms that usually don’t disclose the totals: securities-based loans (SBLs) — or “shadow margin” because no one knows how much of it there is. But it’s a lot. And it’s booming.

These loans can be used for anything – pay for tuition, fix up that kitchen, or fund a vacation. The money is spent, the loan remains. When security prices fall, the problems begin.

Finra, the regulator for brokerages, doesn’t track this shadow margin, nor does the SEC. Both, however, have been warning about the risks. No one knows the overall amount of this shadow margin, but some details have been reported:

  • Morgan Stanley had $36 billion of these loans on its balance sheet as of the end of 2016, up 26% from 2016, and more than twice the amount in 2013.
  • Bank of America Merrill Lynch had $40 billion in SBLs on the balance sheet at the end of 2016, up 140% from 2010;
  • UBS and Wells Fargo “also have made billions in such loans, people familiar with those banks” told the Wall Street Journal. Raymond James, Stifel Nicolaus… they’re all doing it.
  • Fidelity used to fund its own SBLs for its clients, but three years ago partnered with US Bancorp.
  • Even the little ones are trying to get their slice of the pie: In April, robo-advisory startup Wealthfront, with less than $6 billion, announced that it would offer SBLs to its clients.

And now Goldman Sachs, which has been offering SBLs to its 12,000 super-wealthy clients through its Private Banking unit — accounting “for more than half of the unit’s $29 billion in loans outstanding,” according to the Wall Street Journal — announced on Thursday that this wasn’t enough and that it is partnering with Fidelity Investments to spread these loans far and wide.

This effort to lever up investors’ portfolios occurs after an eight-year bull run, with stock indices hopping from one all-time high to the next even as the economy has been growing at a dreadfully slow pace and even as corporate earnings have mostly gone nowhere for years.

Since July 2012, the trailing 12-month “adjusted” earnings-per-share of the companies in the S&P 500 rose just 12% in total. Over the same period, the S&P 500 Index itself soared 80%.

These adjusted earnings are now back where they’d been on March 2014. Three years of earnings stagnation. However, over the same three-plus years, the S&P 500 index has soared 33%.

As earnings have stagnated while stock prices have jumped, the P/E ratio for the S&P 500 companies has soared from 14.8 at the beginning of 2012 to 24.8 now. And bonds have seen an enormous bull run too.

It is at these precariously high levels of the markets that brokerages go into hyper-drive to push “shadow margin” on their clients, using inflated securities as collateral. If markets decline, brokerages start making margin calls, and investors will be forced to sell securities into a falling market at the worst possible time, or else the brokerage will liquidate their portfolios. Investors could lose every dime in their accounts and might be personally responsible for the remainder of the debt.

After eight years of bull market, no one is thinking about risk anymore.

Goldman Sachs will offer these SBLs to about six million accounts managed by 3,850 brokers and wealth managers that use Fidelity’s technology, though they will not be available to Fidelity’s own retail brokerage or wealth-management clients. The Journal:

The centerpiece of the action is a new online platform, called GS Select, that will offer loans of between $75,000 and $25 million, with borrowers’ portfolios of stocks and bonds serving as collateral, the companies said Thursday. Goldman’s software can analyze the holdings and make a decision within a day about how much to lend and on what terms.

Andrew Kaiser, head of Goldman Sachs Private Banking, told The Journal that this partnership with Fidelity is just the first of several:

Small wealth advisers and independent broker-dealers are good fits because they aren’t already connected to a bank, he said.

What’s in it for brokerages?

SBLs are a source of revenue that replaces some of the revenue brokerages lost as they’re moving away from charging commission on trades to charging fees on assets under management. When clients need money, they’d normally sell some securities and withdraw the proceeds from the account. This would lower the asset balance of the account, and therefore the fees for the broker. So brokerages encourage clients to leave their assets intact and add a big loan to the account. This keeps the asset-based fee intact, and the brokerage also earns interest income on the loans.

Everyone at the brokerage benefits from the deal. The Wall Street Journal:

Several Merrill Lynch brokers said they have asked longstanding clients to open securities-backed lines of credit to help them hit bonus hurdles, assuring that clients wouldn’t need to use it or pay any fees for opening it. Merrill brokers receive ongoing payments for getting clients to tap credit lines, and those loan balances contribute to year-end bonus calculations, people familiar with matter said.

 

Brokerage executives have said the longer a client has one of these loans tied to their account, the more likely they are to use it.

 

“We were dramatically pushed to put these on all of our client accounts,” said Steven Dudash, a former Merrill Lynch broker who has been managing his own investment-advisory firm since 2014. “Whenever you’re product-pushing, it’s not in the client’s best interest.”

What’s in it for their clients?

Clients get to pile on low-interest-rate debt and huge risks, including the chance of losing more than all the assets in the account if push comes to shove in the markets and their collateral value gets crushed. They will have to sell into a crash at the worst possible time, and even after they sold all their assets, they might still owe the broker, and the broker will go after them for the remaining debt. The Journal explains:

These arrangements are structured to benefit the brokerage, with the client shouldering virtually all the risk, critics say. And these loan products are often pushed without regard to whether clients even need them, they add.

There is another side effect to this margin debt, whether it is out in the open, like NYSE margin debt, or the shadow margin of those SBLs: When markets decline and forced selling kicks in, it causes a further decline in the market, which causes even more forced selling.

Leverage has been the great accelerator on the way up over the past eight years. And it’s also the great accelerator on the way down.

via http://ift.tt/2uKbsVH Tyler Durden

TIGER, Pork Included in the Senate’s Transportation Sausage

The other kind of tigerThe Senate Committee on Appropriations passed a transportation budget Thursday that includes $550 million in funding for the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant program.

Reason has covered TIGER on multiple occasions, pointing out how the supposedly temporary economic recovery measure quickly morphed into a permanent, maladministered and heavily politicized program, which has sent a total of $5.1 billion to everything from a disastrous streetcar project in Atlanta, to decidedly non-mobile trees and street murals in Los Angeles.

The problems were so widespread and apparent both the House and the Trump Administration made a real effort to kill the program. Trump has called for it to be eliminated in both his budget proposals, something the House agreed to in their 2018 appropriations bill.

However Senate budget writers are proving less willing to part with the pork barrel spending that comes with TIGER.

Baruch Feigenbaum, a transportation policy analyst for the Reason Foundation (which publishes this website) says he’s not surprised by the move.

“In general, most folks like to get free stuff, and most senators like to please their constituents,” he tells Reason, adding that if Senators “have a program they can kind of game and make it as beneficial to themselves as possible, they’re going to stick it in the budget.”

One thing senators have certainly excelled at—particularly those on the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee for Transportation—is gaming TIGER grants for their own benefit.

The chair of the Transportation subcommittee, Sen. Susan Collins (R – Maine) brought home $10 million in TIGER grants last year for a bridge project that will connect the coastal Maine town of Jonesport (pop. 1,370) to Beals Island (pop. 507). Collins’ website proudly boasts that Maine has received $120 million in grants since TIGER began.

Ditto for Sen. Jack Reed (D – RD), the ranking Democrat on that subcommittee, whose home state was awarded $14 million in 2016 for a commuter rail station.

This ability to funnel federal dollars to decidedly local projects is certainly good politics. A small number of constituents get the benefits, the Senators get the votes, and the taxpayers get the bill.

This splurging on hyper-local projects is precisely why Feigenbaum thinks TIGER must end.

“We have a principle of federalism in this county,” he says. “We should abide by those principles and spend federal funding on federal priorities period.”

That means directing federal transportation dollars toward infrastructure that is truly interstate. Highways and freight rail for instance. Not “complete street” projects in downtown Mobile, Alabama.

Feigenbaum holds out hope that TIGER will still go down this year. The full Senate, not just the Appropriations Committee still has to vote on a transportation package, and then reconcile that with a House bill that has already calls for TIGER to be zeroed out.

Whatever ends up happening with the program, the lesson from TIGER is that bad policy is often good politics, allowing flawed spending programs to stick around well past their shelf life.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2w74CZx
via IFTTT

A Minneapolis Mayoral Candidate Wants To Strip The Police Of Their Guns

Authored by Carey Wedler via TheAntiMedia.org,

Amid several high profile police brutality cases in Minneapolis, a mayoral candidate in the twin cities is advocating stripping the majority of police officers of guns in their routine patrols.

Local Fox affiliate KMSP reports that Raymond Dehn, currently a state representative, does not want to completely disarm the police, but rather, limit their free access to guns at all times.

"I’m not saying they don’t have access to that, just like they have access to more lethal weapons in their cars, I would believe they would still have access to their guns in their cars,” said Dehn. He still advocates the use of night sticks and pepper spray.

Dehn’s position follows the recent acquittal of former St. Anthony, Minneapolis officer Jeronimo Yanez, who shot and killed Philando Castile last year and was paid $48,000 to leave the force. Just this month, an Australian woman was shot and killed by a Minneapolis officer after calling the police to report a potential sexual assault nearby. Both cases have drawn substantial scrutiny and outrage across the country.

Cases like these are also costly. The city of Minneapolis, like many other cities, has spent millions of dollars compensating victims of police brutality over the years.

His idea parallels other countries, like the U.K., where police officers do not carry guns and are still able to disarm assailants carrying deadly weapons (though, admittedly, guns are not as common in the U.K).

Dehn’s suggestion sticks out among a slew of candidates who refuse to go as far as him.

 As current Mayor Betsy Hodges said, “And if we are going to talk about changes in gun policy, we shouldn’t start with police officers who are going to be operating in a world with people who have guns.

But Dehn’s proposal isn’t simply a gun grab. Rather, he sees fundamental issues with how Minneapolis police are doing their jobs.

I think as we look at how to change policing and how we get officers to not react to use their gun in situations, but learning skills around de-escalation training I think are important,” he said.

De-escalation tactics have proven effective elsewhere. In Salt Lake City, Utah, police chief Mike Brown has started training officers in de-escalation to minimize the use of deadly force. As local Fox affiliate KSTU reported in May:

Newer techniques involve more voice commands from the officer, and the slight giving and taking ground with a suspect to buy time. This allows the suspect an opportunity to calm down, as well as giving the officer an opportunity to rethink his approach, possibly using non-lethal force like a taser to subdue a suspect.”

There hasn’t been a fatal encounter in Salt Lake City since September of 2015.

In Minneapolis, Dehn is the only mayoral candidate to take such an ‘extreme’ stance, and for now, it’s unlikely it will garner much support.

As head of the Minneapolis Police Union Lt. Bob Kroll said,

I don’t think the people in Minneapolis are logically ready for anything like this. Who would ever do the job of policing again? It’s absolutely an absurd thought.”

But Dehn still wants to sit down with police to discuss the possibilities, and his position alone is indicative of the current climate, where some citizens are increasingly concerned about the ease with which officers commit violence against those they are tasked with protecting.

via http://ift.tt/2uG0bXL Tyler Durden

Goodyear Having A Bad Year: GT Stock Deflates Following Abysmal Outlook For New Car Volumes

For those among our reader base holding out hope that recent weakness in new car volumes was nothing more than a temporary blip in an otherwise healthy auto market, you may want to promptly ignore the awful earnings reported by Goodyear Tire and Rubber this morning, a key supplier to the auto OEMs and a critical leading indicator for overall industry volumes.

As Goodyear CEO Richard Kramer pointed out this morning, the company’s 2Q earnings “played out much differently than we had expected” driven by weak OEM volumes, primarily in the U.S. and China, on the back of those inflated inventory levels that we’ve been harping on for so long (see “GM Reports Record “Channel Stuffing”: Dealer Auto Inventory Highest Since June 2007“).  Here is the CEO on this morning’s call:

But the second quarter played out much differently than we had expected. We saw incremental weakness in the OE market, especially in North America and China. During the second quarter, auto manufacturing inventories remained well above normal levels in the US and China due to softer demand than underlying production.

 

We also saw incremental challenges in replacement, which I’ll address in a moment. As a result, we reduced our full year US consumer OE industry outlook from about flat at the time of our first quarter call to down 4% to 5%. We continue to closely watch OE industry trends, particularly in China.

 

And third, the OE industry has weakened throughout the year, which added incremental pressure in the replacement market, particularly in the US. As I mentioned earlier, the industry is feeling the impact from a lower SAR this year and from the OE’s planned inventory reductions in 2017. The combination of these three factors has led to a first half environment unlike anything that I have ever seen given the favorable trends and miles-driven gasoline prices and employment, which are trends generally supportive of our industry.

So what went wrong in Q2?  Well, volumes crashed in the U.S. for new vehicles and, to a lesser extent, for replacement tires as well…which is ironic given that miles driven continue to increase and, if we’re to believe what we’re repeatedly told, the consumer is in great condition.

 

But it wasn’t just the U.S., European volumes were even worse in 2Q.

 

But don’t worry too much, Q2 volumes were just an ephemeral issues and Goodyear management would like to assure you that they’ll return to ‘normal’ double-digit growth next quarter and remain there through 2018….seems like a very reasonable forecast.

 

Of course, that seems somewhat inconsistent with revised guidance calling for U.S. Consumer OE volumes to now be down 4-5% in 2017 and replacement volumes flattish…

 

But that’s just the U.S., right?  Oh wait, global volume guidance was slashed too.

 

All of which prompted our favorite question from this morning’s conference call courtesy of Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas:

“So just another way of, I guess, asking what the hell happened in the second quarter.”

Apparently a lot of GT investors are wondering the same thing…unfortunately, they’re not hanging out in the stock long enough to figure it out.

via http://ift.tt/2tQwPr6 Tyler Durden

Foreigners Scramble To Buy US Debt Every Time Rates Rise

One of the persistent questions in 2017, has been how – with equities at all time highs – are Treasurys and other corporate bonds so strongly bid, and why is the 10Y still trading at a level that is more suggestive of a deflationary slump than an economic rebound.

The answer it turns out, is to be found offshore, and was especially visible the day before the Fed’s unexpectedly dovish Wednesday statement, when yields and spreads blew out.

As Bank of America’s credit strategist Hans Mikkelsen wrote in a Thursday note, when he observed the sharp move higher in yields and subsequent collapse at 2pm on Wednesday, “note the big rebound in net dealer-to-affiliate volumes following the recent notable increase in interest rates (Figure 3) – especially in the back end (Figure 4).” What the charts below show is the relative interest by offshore traders to buy (negative number) or sell (positive) US debt. What is most notable is that on the day yields and spreads spiked, so do foreign buying. In fact, in the total debt bucket, foreigners bought the most debt in the past year.

Some additional info on the charts above: Figure 3 shows the overall daily dealer-to-affiliate volumes while Figure 4 show a subset of this data. In particular Figure 4 shows net dealer-to-affiliate volumes for longer maturity (12+ years) bonds.

A note also also on Thursday by UBS confirms as much. According to UBS’ Matthew Mish, “the critical marginal source of demand for US corporate debt has been non-US investors, primarily out of Japan, Asia as well as Europe. As we outlined previously they have accounted for nearly 40% of total investor flows into US corporate credit since 2014.”

So what can put an end to its relentless demand by foreigners for US paper? Here’s UBS:

For now, these flows are likely to weaken but not exit – likely pressured by less attractive relative value, rising hedging costs and rising supply of alternative fixed income investments. However, a scenario involving a material risk in credit risk and dollar weakness (vs. the yen specifically) are key risks to monitor, in our view. While today’s ownership structure is not as fragile as the financial crisis (i.e. banks/dealers with significant financial leverage), our prior analysis suggests that the accumulation of debt this cycle has been concentrated in hands that sold more materially during the financial crisis (i.e., rest of world, funds, ETFs, Figure 10).

 

Meanwhile, as UBS adds, purely on fundamentals some demand signals “are flashing yellow,” but are not red just yet.

US credit remains fundamentally expensive with HY and IG spreads roughly 1.1 and 1.3 standard deviations rich. But managers are long credit as growth is deemed reasonable enough to keep default rates below average and industry pressures from low interest rates, QE and passive vehicles is forcing many managers into the market. Some of our key signals are flashing yellow, but fall short of red flags. Our forecasts call for normalization in spreads towards fair value, with weak corporate earnings, policy uncertainty, waning foreign demand and lower oil prices as key downside risks; conversely, tax reform and oil prices into the $50s are upside risks. In the US our core positioning view favors intermediate US high grade bonds, particularly bank bonds as well as floating rate loans (relative to high yield), acknowledging expensive valuations.

Finally, looking at just the Treasury market using the most up to date proxy available, the Fed’s Custody Account, the selloff observed in 2016 is now clearly over, and as of the week of July 26, foreign holdings of US paper parked at the Fed were back over $3 trillion, and just why of all time highs. So much for that great foreign dumping of US Treasurys.

via http://ift.tt/2u5r6Zu Tyler Durden