James Mattis in Afghanistan, Peyton Manning for Senate Talk, Rick Pitino Out at Louisville: P.M. Links

  • President Trump and Republican leaders in Congress unveiled the most detailed look at their tax cut plan yet.
  • The Taliban claimed responsibility for a failed mortar attack on the airport in Kabul while Secretary of Defense James Mattis was making an unannounced visit to Afghanistan.
  • Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who announced he would not be seeking re-election in 2018, said Peyton Manning could run to succeed him.
  • The head of the state police in Michigan apologized for calling NFL players taking a knee during the national anthem “a bunch of rich, entitled, arrogant, ungrateful, anti-American degenerates” on her Facebook page.
  • The government in Iraq has suspended international flights into Kurdistan and is urging foreign countries to close their embassies in the province after its residents overwhelmingly voted in favor of independence.
  • Some women in Saudi Arabia have gotten behind the wheel after the kingdom lifted a ban on women driving, even though it will not issue licenses for another nine months.
  • Rick Pitino is out at Louisville amid an investigation into college basketball corruption.
  • Believing conspiracy theories makes people feel special.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2yHW51d
via IFTTT

Small Caps Surge Most Since Election As Bonds Suffer Worst Rut In Over 50 Years

Today in Small Caps…

Small Caps exploded over 2% higher – the biggest gain since the election – on Trump Tax hype… (we note that marketd di roll over a little once Trump began speaking)

(NOTE – today was the biggest short-squeeze in 2 months)

VIX was monkeyhammered back to a 9 handle… because why not…2500 was rescued once again…

 

Interestingly, while Russell 2000 melted up insanely, its VIX also rose notably…

 

Quite a decoupling…

 

In an ironic move, The Fed's Bullard warned that "equity valuations may be stretched" and the S&P ripped to a new record high above 2510…

 

While the market seemed to sell off on the leaked tax plan details, we note that 'high tax' corporations extended their recent gains relative to the market…

 

The last 6 days have seen the biggest spike in 'high-tax corps relative to the market' since the election… (NOTE – the last surge was in June as Mnuchin shared his one-pager and once again we are back at the election level that stalled hope before)

 

Notably the initial spike faded quickly then accelerated but once the Republicans began their press conference, high-tax stocks underperformed the market, but that did not last long…

 

FANG Stocks were bid with both hands and feet…

 

Ugly day in bond-land as Treasury yields surged extending losses after yesterday's hawkish Yellen comments…

 

This was the 30Y Yield's biggest spike since the election…back to the same level as at the June Fed rate-hike…

 

The yield curve steepened massively… as bank stocks underperformed the market

 

Will Gundlach be right after all?

 

But, as Bloomberg notes, the world’s most important bond market is stuck in its worst rut in more than half a century. Ten-year U.S. Treasury yields have been locked between 2.01 percent and 2.63 percent in 2017 — a measly 62 basis points. That’s the tightest trading range since 1965 and analysts see little capacity for a breakout going forward: The median year-end estimate of 62 analysts and strategists surveyed by Bloomberg is for 2.48 percent.

 

The Dollar Index rallied to its highest in over 6 weeks (since Aug 16th when the FOMC Minutes were released)…

 

The Loonie was the big mover after Poloz backed away from continued rate hikes…

 

FX Volatility is trading at the upper end of its multi-year range relative to stock vol…

 

WTI rebounced but RBOB did not after DOE inventory/production data…

 

Copper, Gold, and Silver are all down on the week…

 

Gold tumbled to a $1280 handle (one-month lows) as the dollar surged and Bitcoin spiked towards $4200…

 

Erasing Bitcoin's post-Dimon drop after Gorman's comments…

 

Bitcoin also pushed back well ahead of The Swiss National Bank…

 

Finally, there is this…hope is a strategy after all…

via http://ift.tt/2wWiD1d Tyler Durden

NFL Viewership Is Down 11% This Season As Fans “Take A Knee”

In the latest sign that viewers are turning out in droves over the politicization of professional sports, the Associated Press reports that through the first three weeks of the NFL season, viewership for national telecasts of NFL games is down 11% compared with 2016, Nielsen company said on Tuesday. While games had averaged 17.63 million viewers during the first three weeks of last season, that number has dipped to just 15.65 million so far this year. 

The Nielsen figures don’t include many of the Sunday afternoon games that are shown to a regional audience, but not a national one.

The report is the latest sign that NFL ratings are, in fact, sliding, as President Donald Trump has claimed. Earlier this week, NBC reported a week-over-week, and year-over-year, drop in ratings for “Sunday Night Football” as the primetime match-up between the 27-10 winning Washington Redskins and the Oakland Raiders snared an 11.6/20. That’s the worst rating for SNF this season.

During the game, the Redskins linked arms last night, while nearly every single Raiders player sat on the bench during the anthem.

However, not every network saw a ratings dip. Bloomberg reports that CBS, whose Sunday night games included a closely fought matchup between the Green Bay Packers and the Cincinnati Bengals, experienced a small ratings bump, probably because the close score drew in more viewers.

President Trump has notably called for fans to boycott the NFL until owners adopt rules firing or sanctioning players who refuse to stand for the National Anthem. The feud between Trump and the league started Friday night when the president said any player who would kneel is a “son of a b***h” who deserves to be fired, adding that any owner who cracks down on  protests would be "the most popular person in the country – for a week at least." NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Patriots owner Robert Kraft both said they were disappointed that Trump had "disrespected" the league in such a way.

Earlier today, Trump tweeted that he had spoken with Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, who earlier this week linked arms and kneeled with his team after the Anthem finished playing, drawing a chorus of boos. The President suggested that the owner had promised him that players would stand for the anthem in the future.

And as the AP notes, next week’s ratings will be even more closely watched, since conservative groups and Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity have joined in Trump’s calls for fans to boycott games.

So, the question for NFL franchise owners remains – if players continue to take a knee, will viewers join them?


 

via http://ift.tt/2wX7dp3 Tyler Durden

Don’t Become a Right-Wing Snowflake

But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg…Reason and free inquiry are the only effectual agents against error. Give a loose rein to them, they will support the true religion by bringing every false one to their tribunal, to the test of their investigation.

– Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia

Here’s a prediction. Right-wing snowflake culture will expand exponentially in the coming years, and its rise will be cynically and intentionally fueled by Donald Trump himself. Having proved himself a fake populist on most issues that actually matter, Trump has no choice but to move more enthusiastically into the culture war to deflect away from his obvious betrayal on economic populism and keep his diehard supporters in heat. In other words, he’ll do exactly what mainstream Democrats and Republicans have been doing for decades, which is distract the public and keep it fighting while oligarchs grab what little is left. This works out just fine for billionaire Trump and the Goldman Sachs guys running his administration.

If I’m correct, how should we respond? How do those of us who see a creeping right-wing snowflake culture emerging push back? Rule number one is don’t act like a snowflake in response. Exposing hypocrisy with incisive rational arguments and humor is the best way to push back against right-wing authoritarianism, just like it’s the best way to push back against left-wing authoritarianism. The authoritarian mindset is the enemy of freedom loving people everywhere irrespective of your specific views on health care, taxes, etc. There are far bigger things at risk to us as a people if we allow ourselves to be divided into two separate authoritarian gangs fighting for power.

Unfortunately, this is exactly what seems to be happening with far too many people, and I ask that you not play this dangerous game. People are vulnerable to autocratic cults when they lack real principles based on freedom; when they know what they’re against, but don’t really know what they’re for. Standing for something as empowering and ethical as liberty is what keeps you grounded and sane in the midst of a society-wide mental breakdown.

continue reading

from Liberty Blitzkrieg http://ift.tt/2fsVsQJ
via IFTTT

Teachers Demand $3,200 From Each Kentucky Household To Fund Pension Ponzi For 2 Years

We have written frequently over the past couple of weeks about the disastrous public pension funds in Kentucky that are anywhere from $42 – $84 billion underfunded, depending on which discount rate you feel inclined to use. As we’ve argued before, these pensions, like the ones in Illinois and other states, are so hopelessly underfunded that they haven’t a prayer of ever again being made whole.

That said, logic and math have never before stopped pissed off teachers and/or clueless legislators from throwing good money after bad in an effort to ‘kick the can down the road’ on their pension crises. As such, it should come as no surprise at all that the Lexington Herald Leader reported today that Kentucky’s 365,000 teachers and other public employees are now demanding that taxpayers contribute a staggering $5.4 billion to their insolvent ponzi schemes over the next two years alone. To put that number in perspective, $5.4 billion is roughly $3,200 for each household in the state of Kentucky and 25% of the state’s entire budget over a two-year period. 

Kentucky’s General Assembly will need to find an estimated $5.4 billion to fund the pension systems for state workers and school teachers in the next two-year state budget, officials told the Public Pension Oversight Board on Monday.

 

That amount would be a hefty funding increase and a painful squeeze for a state General Fund that — at about $20 billion over two years — also is expected to pay for education, prisons, social services and other state programs.

 

“We realize this challenge is in front of us. That’s obviously part of the need for us to address pension reform,” said state Sen. Joe Bowen, R-Owensboro, co-chairman of the oversight board.

 

“In the short-term, yeah, we’re obligated to find this money,” Bowen said. “And everybody is committed to do that. We have revealed this great challenge. We have embraced this great challenge, as opposed to previous members of the legislature, perhaps.”

 

In presentations on Monday, the pension oversight board was told that total employer contributions for KRS in Fiscal Years 2019 and 2020 would be an estimated $2.47 billion each year, up from $1.52 billion in the current fiscal year. Nearly $995 million of that would be owed by local governments. The remaining $1.48 billion is what the state would owe.

 

The Teachers’ Retirement System estimated that it would need a total of $1.22 billion in Fiscal Year 2019 and $1.22 billion in Fiscal Year 2020. That would include not only an additional $1 billion to pay down the system’s unfunded liabilities but also $139 million to continue paying the debt service on a pension bond that won’t be paid off until the year 2024.

Of course, the $5.4 billion will do absolutely nothing to avoid an inevitable failure of Kentucky’s pension system but what the hell…

Pension

As we’ve said before, the problem is that the aggregate underfunded liability of pensions in states like Kentucky have become so incredibly large that massive increases in annual contributions, courtesy of taxpayers, can’t possibly offset liability growth and annual payouts.  All the while, the funding for these ever increasing annual contributions comes out of budgets for things like public schools even though the incremental funding has no shot of fixing a system that is hopelessly “too big to bail.”

KY

So what can Kentucky do to solve their pension crisis?  Well, as it turns out they hired a pension consultant, PFM Group, in May of last year to answer that exact question.  Unfortunately, we suspect that PFM’s conclusions, which include freezing current pension plans, slashing benefit payments for current retirees and converting future employees to a 401(k), are somewhat less than palatable for both pensioners and elected officials who depend upon votes from public employee unions in order to keep their jobs…it’s a nice little circular ref that ensures that taxpayers will always lose in the fight to fix America’s broken pension system.

Be that as it may, here is a recap of PFM’s suggestions to Kentucky’s Public Pension Oversight Board courtesy of the Lexington Herald Leader:

An independent consultant recommended sweeping changes Monday to the pension systems that cover most of Kentucky’s public workers, creating the possibility that lawmakers will cut payments to existing retirees and force most current and future hires into 401(k)-style retirement plans.

 

If the legislature accepts the recommendations, it would effectively end the promise of a pension check for most of Kentucky’s future state and local government workers and freeze the pension benefits of most current state and local workers. All of those workers would then be shifted to a 401(k)-style investment plan that offers defined employer contributions rather than a defined retirement benefit.

 

PFM also recommended increasing the retirement age to 65 for most workers.

 

The 401 (k)-style plans would require a mandatory employee contribution of 3 percent of their salary and a guaranteed employer contribution of 2 percent of their salary. The state also would provide a 50 percent match on the next 6 percent of income contributed by the employee, bringing the state’s maximum contribution to 5 percent. The maximum total contribution from the employer and the employee would be 14 percent.

 

For those already retired, the consultant recommended taking away all cost of living benefits that state and local government retirees received between 1996 and 2012, a move that could significantly reduce the monthly checks that many retirees receive. For example, a government worker who retired in 2001 or before could see their benefit rolled back by 25 percent or more, PFM calculated.

 

The consultant also recommended eliminating the use of unused sick days and compensatory leave to increase pension benefits.

Meanwhile, PFM warned that the typical “kick the can down the road approach” would not work in Kentucky and that current retiree benefits would have to be cut.

“This is the time to act,” said Michael Nadol of PFM. “This is not the time to craft a solution that kicks the can down the road.”

 

“All of the unfunded liability that the commonwealth now faces is associated with folks that are already on board or already retired,” he said. “Modifying benefits for future hires only helps you stop the hole from getting deeper, it doesn’t help you climb up and out on to more solid footing going forward.”

Of course, no amount of math and logic will ever be sufficient to convince a bunch of retired public employees that they have been sold a lie that will inevitably fail now or fail later (take your pick) if drastic measures aren’t taken in the very near future. 

via http://ift.tt/2fq2uWo Tyler Durden

Harvard Crimson: University Is Right to Ban Fraternities, Wrong to Ban Sororities

HarvardHarvard University has plans to purge all single-sex social organizations from campus. The editors of the Harvard Crimson are perfectly okay with that—with the exception of sororities.

All-male clubs are bad, all-female clubs are good, runs the simple logic of the student-run newspaper. Which is funny, given that one of the justifications for getting rid of those clubs is that they are discriminatory.

The editorial dropped a few weeks after a committee recommended that Harvard’s administration upgrade to a full-on ban its previous policy of imposing sanctions on students who join finals clubs. “The discriminatory practices of these organizations undermine our educational mission and the principles espoused by this Faculty and distance their members from their College experience,” wrote the committee.

The Crimson agrees:

We support this recommendation, and we urge University President Drew G. Faust to do so as well. It importantly expands the discourse beyond issues of gender inequality and sexual assault to the role exclusionary social organizations play in perpetuating outdated notions of elitism, classism, and exclusivity on campus. The report rightfully highlights how these organizations impact students’ sense of belonging at Harvard, especially those who come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Given the serious influence of final clubs on the daily social life of Harvard undergraduates, we see this recommendation as necessary.

But:

Our support does not come without reservations about the process. The composition of the committee is primarily faculty members, and they may not be close enough to student life. Although their input is welcome, the weight of the decision should rest with deans and administrators who are trained to have student social life under their purview. Moreover, as we have opined in the past, we wish it was possible for administrators to better distinguish male final clubs and sororities. If the committee seeks to combat exclusivity and foster belonging, arguably sororities can provide a supportive role by giving women a social space on campus.

The university should combat exclusivity by excluding students who do not identify as female from forming exclusive clubs? At least the more comprehensive ban is even handed.

Harvard is a private institution, so it can implement whatever policy it wants: a ban on only finals clubs and fraternities, a ban on all single-sex groups, whatever. Whether such a course of action is wise is another matter.

The policy appears to punish students for political reasons—a consistent refrain has been that the finals clubs are not “progressive” enough. And since these groups were never officially recognized by Harvard in the first place, it puts the university in the strange position of trying to prevent students from freely associating with each other in an unofficial capacity. Will the administration employ spies to make sure too many students of same sex aren’t hanging out together in a club-esque way?

Steven Pinker, a professor of psychology at Harvard, has criticized the university for trying to eliminate single-sex clubs:

A university is an institution with circumscribed responsibilities which engages in a contract with its students. Its main responsibility is to provide them with an education. It is not an arbiter over their lives, 24/7. What they do on their own time is none of the university’s business.

One of the essential values in higher education is that people can differ in their values, and that these differences can be constructively discussed. Harvard has a right to value mixed-sex venues everywhere, all the time, with no exceptions. If some of its students find value in private, single-sex associations, some of the time, a university is free to argue against, discourage, or even ridicule those choices. But it is not a part of the mandate of a university to impose these values on its students over their objections.

Universities ought to be places where issues are analyzed, distinctions are made, evidence is evaluated, and policies crafted to attain clearly stated goals. This recommendation is a sledgehammer which doesn’t distinguish between single-sex and other private clubs. It doesn’t target illegal or objectionable behavior such as drunkenness or public disturbances. Nor by any stretch of the imagination could it be seen as an effective, rationally justified, evidence-based policy tailored to reduce sexual assault.

This illiberal policy can only contribute to the impression in the country at large that elite universities are not dispassionate forums for clarifying values, analyzing problems, and proposing evidence-based solutions, but are institutions determined to impose their ideology and values on a diverse population by brute force.

Pinker is right. Harvard—and The Crimson—deserve all the opprobrium they’re likely to receive.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2xxU7Tp
via IFTTT

Andrew Puzder on Minimum Wage, Automation, and Withdrawing as Trump’s Labor Secretary Nominee: New at Reason

When the minimum wage goes to $15 an hour “you kill jobs,” says Andrew Puzder—”businesses close, businesses reduce staff and automate, and businesses reduce the hours of the employees they have.”

But “what you can’t measure, which is really what hurts economic growth…is the number of restaurants that don’t open.”

Puzder is best known as the former head of CKE Restaurants, the parent company of fast fast-food chains Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. When he was named CEO in 2000, the company was on the verge of bankruptcy. Puzder focused his attention on improving the customer experience, improving the food quality, simplifying the menu, and emphasizing good service. Ten years later, CKE had quadrupled in value.

Reason’s Nick Gillespie sat down with Puzder at FreedomFest 2017, the annual libertarian conference in Las Vegas.

Click below for full text, links, and downloadable versions.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Like us on Facebook.

Follow us on Twitter.

Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes.

View this article.

from Hit & Run http://ift.tt/2hy92a7
via IFTTT

Watch Live: President Trump Unveils His Already-Widely-Leaked Tax Plan

Moments from now President Trump is expected to the take the stage at the Indiana State Fair to ‘unveil’ a tax plan that was leaked by someone in or around his administration hours ago…which we suspect is somewhat more anticlimactic than he might have hoped.  In any event, earlier this morning we covered the details of Trump’s plan to ‘make taxes great again’ in a post entitled “Here Is The Leaked Trump Tax Plan.”

Of course, even though 9 pages worth of “details” were leaked, there are still gaping holes in Trump’s tax reform package which has so far failed to define personal income cutoffs for the various tax brackets, whether a new top bracket will be implemented on the highest earners, how carried interest will be treated for hedge fund and private equity managers, etc.

Tune in below to see if any new tax details are revealed:

via http://ift.tt/2xxwRoP Tyler Durden

Iraq Deploys Troops To Kirkuk After Kurdistan “Yes” Vote; Turkey Threatens Blockade

Immediately on the heels of the Iraqi Kurdistan "yes" vote, the Iraqi parliament approved sending troops to the disputed Kirkuk region to prevent the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) from taking full control of the oil-rich area. Preliminary official results out Wednesday indicate a 92% vote in favor of Kurdish independence. A written statement produced by Baghdad said the decision aims to protect Iraqi citizens residing in the contested area between Baghdad and Erbil. But the decision is also no doubt motivated by protection of Kirkuk's multiple oil and gas fields, which Baghdad has now ordered the KRG to hand over, including all other oil facilities throughout northern Iraq.

The KRG held its deeply controversial referendum on Kurdish independence Monday, which as expected resulted in a "yes" vote to declare the autonomous Iraqi region a new state. Kurdish leader Masoud Barzani announced the results of the referendum on live TV Tuesday, while attempting to ease tensions by urging "serious dialogue" with the Baghdad government instead of threats of sanctions and troop presence. Barzani further warned Iraqi Kurds of "facing hardships" while also pleading with world powers to “to respect the will of millions of people”.

Currently, Israel is the only country which has voiced public support for Kurdish independence – something which has earned the condemnation of Turkey, Iran, and others in the region. Israel stands accused of using the Kurds of to Balkanize Iraq and the broader Arab region. 

Turkey for its part has come close to warning Israel that it could cut diplomatic ties should Israel continue in its public support of an independent Kurdistan. This week Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned, “If they do not review, we cannot take a lot of steps that we were about to take with Israel” – to which Israeli lawmakers responded that such threats were "empty". 

Kurdish-Iraqi disputed regions of Iraq. The tan areas are disputed but are officially under the control of the Iraqi government. The pink sections are disputed but part of the KRG since 1991. Map source: Wiki Commons

But Erdogan had more direct and harsher words for Kurdish leadership, saying in a televised speech Tuesday that, "If Barzani and the Kurdish Regional Government do not go back on this mistake as soon as possible, they will go down in history with the shame of having dragged the region into an ethnic and sectarian war." While referencing what appears to be an emerging Israeli-Kurdistan open alliance and mutual support, Erdogan further stated, “Who will recognize your independence? Israel. The world is not about Israel. You should know that the waving of Israeli flags there will not save you.” 

Both Iran and Turkey have amassed troops and significant military hardware along their borders with Kurdistan, including tanks which are participating in war games as a show of force. Iraqi troops have reportedly joined Turkish troops in conducting joint military exercises in the region. As we previously reported, Iran immediately closed its airspace to the two international airports located in territory administered by the KRG, and Baghdad has demanded that these be handed over as well. 

The Baghdad government has further declared closure of airspace over Kurdish northern Iraq, prompting some regional carriers to indefinitely suspend flights into Erbil. Lebanon's Middle East Airlines (MEA) was the first to announce it would be suspending flights "until they solve the issue." And Royal Jordanian, FlyDubai, Turkish Airlines and EgyptAir are among the latest to join the growing list. Iraqi PM Abadi has given the KRG three days to surrender not only the airports, but all land crossings as well. Border crossings into Syrian Kurdis areas of Syria have reportedly been kept open by the KRG and/or Kurdish militias administering the crossings.


Image source: Iraq Energy Institute

But more significant is Turkey's threat of blockade on the region. Kurdistan's Ministry of Trade and Industry estimates business exchanges with Turkey and Iran exceed $10 billion per year. Kurdistan imports 95% of its agriculture needs from Turkey and Iran and depends on Turkey to export its oil. Turkey has long been a key economic and trade lifeline to landlocked Iraqi Kurdistan. By the numbers, the KRG controls over 20% of Iraqi oil  (Iraq produces around 4.35 million barrels per day and Kurdistan 900,000 b/d), its energy reserves are estimated around 45 billion barrels of oil and 150 trillion cubic meter of gas, and it exports around 600.000 b/d via Turkey. Oil has long been the source of dispute between Baghdad and Erbil, and is especially contested when it comes to fields along the conventional disputed "borders" of Kurdish Iraq, of which Kirkuk is part. 

Kirkuk fell under the control of Kurdish forces in 2014 after ISIS took control of large swathes of the country. As ISIS was defeated and retreated from some areas, Kurdish Peshmerga fighters moved in. On Wednesday Abadi told Iraqi lawmakers that that he will “enforce the rule of the federal authority in the Kurdish region with the power of the constitution,” while adding that he doesn't want “a fight between the Iraqi citizens.”

Though Baghdad has signaled on multiple occasions that it will avoid military confrontation and has "ruled out use of force" while seeking dialogue, it is unclear what will actually happen once Iraqi and Kurdish forces attempt to maintain control of the same disputed city. In the meantime Baghdad has formally requested that the KRG rescind the referendum – something unlikely to happen – and has warned that meaningful dialogue would not be possible until such a step be taken.

via http://ift.tt/2xLWiT8 Tyler Durden

Stocks Hit New All Time High Just After Bullard Says “Valuations Are Stretched”

With the Fed finally admitting it is confused by the “mystery” of inflation, it has also become painfully clear how perplexed it is by the biggest asset bubble in history that the Fed and its central bank peers have blown. But don’t call it a humorless bubble.

Case in point, on Wednesday afternoon, St. Louis Fed president James Bullard, who is best known for i) flipflopping from the Fed’s biggest hawk to its most wimpish dove and ii) invoking QE4 any time the S&P has even a 3% correction,  said that while “bubble is a strong word”, admitted that “equity valuations may be stretched.”

Then, demonstrating phenomenal observations skills, the chief bubble blower said that ”certainly the whole market is up. A lot of it is associated with a few stocks” that are “tech stocks with exceptional valuations.” And just in case there was any confusion why said tech stocks have exception valuations, Bullard then clarified “I am the most dovish member of the FOMC. I used to worry about inflation pressure.”

Ah yes, yet another “economist” who doesn’t realize that inflation comes in two places: real economy prices, where the Fed’s policies have been a complete disaster, and asset prices, where they have succeeded in unleashing hyperinflation.

And just to confirm that while he is lamenting the bubble the Fed has created, he wants even more of it, Bullard then said “we do not need to be preemptive in trying to get ahead of inflation developments.”

Yes, #Ref!

And while Bullard then went on to cement just how clueless he truly is, claiming that “low productivity has been the key culprit in low GDP growth”, and apparently not 350% debt/GDP, and saying that “you probably won’t see in the U.S. a better labor market than we have today. This is probably as good as it gets” referring to an economic “recovery” built on the backs of several million waiter and bartenders, just after Bullard’s warning that “equity valuations may be stretched”, the S&P went on and hit a new all time high for one simple reason: the algos know that should the market fall, it will be hacks like Bullard who will come screaming for QE4, 5, and so on, as they watch their precious centrally-planned experiment in “wealth effect” creation on the verge of collapse.

via http://ift.tt/2xC6zPO Tyler Durden